Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.53106/172635812022060041006
林怡潔 林怡潔, 林璟筠 Yi-Chieh Jessica Lin
為探討我國報紙媒體新聞在對長者相關報導中，呈現何種形象以及報導框架趨勢，本研究以《蘋果新聞網》2015年6月1日至2017年5月31日老人相關新聞為研究樣本，將老人相關新聞分為四大類框架進行分析:時勢所趨框架、社會問題框架、轉機或契機框架以及醫療框架，其中社會問題框架再進一步區分出兩個子框架，含一般社會問題，以及「老人為弱勢族群」之框架。研究發現，《蘋果新聞 網》以社會問題框架報導老人為最多數，報導中以負面形象呈現較多，對於不同性別之描述亦有差異，且占一成的老人新聞為置入性行銷內容，建議新聞媒體應更重視老人相關新聞之資訊品質。 This study analyzed news coverage of older adults in The Apple Daily from June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2017 to elucidate how newspapers represent older adults in Taiwan. The study divided the subject of news articles into four categories: trends, social problems, health, and new opportunities. The results indicate that numerous articles related to older adults are framed as negative and highlight social problems. The articles also represent older men and women differently. Approximately one-tenth of the articles are native advertising. This study also provided suggestions for news media to improve the quality of their information regarding older adults.
为探讨我国报纸媒体新闻在对长者相关报导中，呈现何种形象以及报导框架趋势，本研究以《苹果新闻网》2015年6月1日至2017年5月31日老人相关新闻为研究样本，将老人相关新闻分为四大类框架进行分析:时势所趋框架、社会问题框架、转机或契机框架以及医疗框架，其中社会问题框架再进一步区分出两个子框架，含一般社会问题，以及「老人为弱势族群」之框架。研究发现，《苹果新闻 网》以社会问题框架报导老人为最多数，报导中以负面形象呈现较多，对于不同性别之描述亦有差异，且占一成的老人新闻为置入性行销内容，建议新闻媒体应更重视老人相关新闻之资讯品质。 This study analyzed news coverage of older adults in The Apple Daily from June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2017 to elucidate how newspapers represent older adults in Taiwan. The study divided the subject of news articles into four categories: trends, social problems, health, and new opportunities. The results indicate that numerous articles related to older adults are framed as negative and highlight social problems. The articles also represent older men and women differently. Approximately one-tenth of the articles are native advertising. This study also provided suggestions for news media to improve the quality of their information regarding older adults.
{"title":"新聞如何再現老人:以臺灣《蘋果新聞網》之框架與內容分析為例","authors":"林怡潔 林怡潔, 林璟筠 Yi-Chieh Jessica Lin","doi":"10.53106/172635812022060041006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 為探討我國報紙媒體新聞在對長者相關報導中，呈現何種形象以及報導框架趨勢，本研究以《蘋果新聞網》2015年6月1日至2017年5月31日老人相關新聞為研究樣本，將老人相關新聞分為四大類框架進行分析:時勢所趨框架、社會問題框架、轉機或契機框架以及醫療框架，其中社會問題框架再進一步區分出兩個子框架，含一般社會問題，以及「老人為弱勢族群」之框架。研究發現，《蘋果新聞 網》以社會問題框架報導老人為最多數，報導中以負面形象呈現較多，對於不同性別之描述亦有差異，且占一成的老人新聞為置入性行銷內容，建議新聞媒體應更重視老人相關新聞之資訊品質。\u0000 This study analyzed news coverage of older adults in The Apple Daily from June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2017 to elucidate how newspapers represent older adults in Taiwan. The study divided the subject of news articles into four categories: trends, social problems, health, and new opportunities. The results indicate that numerous articles related to older adults are framed as negative and highlight social problems. The articles also represent older men and women differently. Approximately one-tenth of the articles are native advertising. This study also provided suggestions for news media to improve the quality of their information regarding older adults.\u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":377163,"journal":{"name":"中華傳播學刊","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124199398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.53106/172635812022060041008
陳佳琦 陳佳琦
本文評論張世倫所著之《現實的探求——臺灣攝影史形構考》一書。本書具備臺灣攝影史的批判性歷史綱要之雛型，但在臺灣攝影史研究積累仍不夠成熟的現況之下，抗拒了整體歷史書寫的使命，卻也同時打開了檔案研究的可能性。本文首先就臺灣攝影史架構的反省與研究進路，衡量本書在攝影史研究進路上的角色意義與推進。其次，之於歷來攝影史的史料發掘、繼承與再考工作，觀察《形構考》展示了怎樣的研究實踐、意義與價值。最後，本書強調將影像與檔案予以「問題意識化」，而其對國族攝影史的抵抗之外，進行了怎樣的實踐及其可能產生的正面意義。 This article reviews Shih-Lun Chang’s book titled Reclaiming Reality: On the Historical Formation of Taiwanese Photography, which has been concluded to be a prototype of a critical historical outline of the history of Taiwanese photography. Research on the history of photography in Taiwan remains insufficient, and this book resists the mission of overall historical writing as well as opens up possibilities for archival research. This review firstly, based on the reflections on the study frame of Taiwan photography history, evaluates the significance and advancement of this book. Secondly, regarding the excavation, inheritance, and archaeology of historical photographic materials, this article uncovers the meaning and values of the type of research discussed in this book. Finally, this article emphasizes that the “problem-consciousness” of the book creates practical and positive meaning that goes beyond the resistance to the history of national photography.
本文评论张世伦所著之《现实的探求——台湾摄影史形构考》一书。本书具备台湾摄影史的批判性历史纲要之雏型，但在台湾摄影史研究积累仍不够成熟的现况之下，抗拒了整体历史书写的使命，却也同时打开了档案研究的可能性。本文首先就台湾摄影史架构的反省与研究进路，衡量本书在摄影史研究进路上的角色意义与推进。其次，之于历来摄影史的史料发掘、继承与再考工作，观察《形构考》展示了怎样的研究实践、意义与价值。最后，本书强调将影像与档案予以「问题意识化」，而其对国族摄影史的抵抗之外，进行了怎样的实践及其可能产生的正面意义。 This article reviews Shih-Lun Chang’s book titled Reclaiming Reality: On the Historical Formation of Taiwanese Photography, which has been concluded to be a prototype of a critical historical outline of the history of Taiwanese photography. Research on the history of photography in Taiwan remains insufficient, and this book resists the mission of overall historical writing as well as opens up possibilities for archival research. This review firstly, based on the reflections on the study frame of Taiwan photography history, evaluates the significance and advancement of this book. Secondly, regarding the excavation, inheritance, and archaeology of historical photographic materials, this article uncovers the meaning and values of the type of research discussed in this book. Finally, this article emphasizes that the “problem-consciousness” of the book creates practical and positive meaning that goes beyond the resistance to the history of national photography.
{"title":"照見攝影史的陰影與暗角: 評介《現實的探求——臺灣攝影史形構考》","authors":"陳佳琦 陳佳琦","doi":"10.53106/172635812022060041008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041008","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 本文評論張世倫所著之《現實的探求——臺灣攝影史形構考》一書。本書具備臺灣攝影史的批判性歷史綱要之雛型，但在臺灣攝影史研究積累仍不夠成熟的現況之下，抗拒了整體歷史書寫的使命，卻也同時打開了檔案研究的可能性。本文首先就臺灣攝影史架構的反省與研究進路，衡量本書在攝影史研究進路上的角色意義與推進。其次，之於歷來攝影史的史料發掘、繼承與再考工作，觀察《形構考》展示了怎樣的研究實踐、意義與價值。最後，本書強調將影像與檔案予以「問題意識化」，而其對國族攝影史的抵抗之外，進行了怎樣的實踐及其可能產生的正面意義。\u0000 This article reviews Shih-Lun Chang’s book titled Reclaiming Reality: On the Historical Formation of Taiwanese Photography, which has been concluded to be a prototype of a critical historical outline of the history of Taiwanese photography. Research on the history of photography in Taiwan remains insufficient, and this book resists the mission of overall historical writing as well as opens up possibilities for archival research. This review firstly, based on the reflections on the study frame of Taiwan photography history, evaluates the significance and advancement of this book. Secondly, regarding the excavation, inheritance, and archaeology of historical photographic materials, this article uncovers the meaning and values of the type of research discussed in this book. Finally, this article emphasizes that the “problem-consciousness” of the book creates practical and positive meaning that goes beyond the resistance to the history of national photography.\u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":377163,"journal":{"name":"中華傳播學刊","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116615672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.53106/172635812022060041010
羅世宏 羅世宏
合而觀之，朱莉亞.卡熱和瑪莎.米諾的這兩本書都值得細讀，分別從經濟學和法學的角度論證了媒體政策變革的必要性與迫切性，也都不約而同地在書名中強調了「拯救」(saving)一詞，不只論證 新聞業值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒體(media)與救新聞(news)的具體建議。從她們的書中，新聞業政策思辨逐漸清晰，典範轉移呼之欲出，代表著歐陸與北美學術界關於新聞業前途的重要立論，非常值得台灣本地關心新聞與民主前景的人參考，並且用以思考綢繆本地新聞業危機的改革策略與主張。 These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.
合而观之，朱莉亚.卡热和玛莎.米诺的这两本书都值得细读，分别从经济学和法学的角度论证了媒体政策变革的必要性与迫切性，也都不约而同地在书名中强调了「拯救」(saving)一词，不只论证 新闻业值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒体(media)与救新闻(news)的具体建议。从她们的书中，新闻业政策思辨逐渐清晰，典范转移呼之欲出，代表著欧陆与北美学术界关于新闻业前途的重要立论，非常值得台湾本地关心新闻与民主前景的人参考，并且用以思考绸缪本地新闻业危机的改革策略与主张。 These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.
{"title":"新聞業的政策思辨與典範轉移:新聞業危機該救嗎?怎麼救?","authors":"羅世宏 羅世宏","doi":"10.53106/172635812022060041010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041010","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 合而觀之，朱莉亞.卡熱和瑪莎.米諾的這兩本書都值得細讀，分別從經濟學和法學的角度論證了媒體政策變革的必要性與迫切性，也都不約而同地在書名中強調了「拯救」(saving)一詞，不只論證 新聞業值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒體(media)與救新聞(news)的具體建議。從她們的書中，新聞業政策思辨逐漸清晰，典範轉移呼之欲出，代表著歐陸與北美學術界關於新聞業前途的重要立論，非常值得台灣本地關心新聞與民主前景的人參考，並且用以思考綢繆本地新聞業危機的改革策略與主張。\u0000 These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.\u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":377163,"journal":{"name":"中華傳播學刊","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125511068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：