Ablart, Damien [Vi et al. 2017] Abler, Craig Abou Khaled, Omar [Angelini et al. 2018a, 2018b, 2018c] Abowd, Gregory D Ackerman, J. [Ackerman et al. 2000] Ackermann, Edith ADA [of Digital Art ADA] Adams, Matt Adelson, Edward [Follmer et al. 2011] Aedo, Ignacio Agarwala, Aseem [Anderson et al. 2000] Aguilar, P. V. Ahmet, Zeynep [Ahmet et al. 2011] Aigner, Roland Aish, Robert [Aish 1979, Aish and Noakes 1984, Noakes and Aish 1984] Akaoka, Eric Al-Haddad, Tristan [Mazalek et al. 2009] [Jensen and Aagaard 2018] [Verhaegh et al. 2013]
Ablart，Damien [Vi et al. 2017] Abler，Craig Abou Khaled，Omar [Angelini et al. 2018a，2018b，2018c] Abowd，Gregory D Ackerman，J. [Ackerman et al. 2000] Ackermann，Edith ADA [of Digital Art ADA] Adams，Matt Adelson，Edward [Follmer et al. 2011] Aedo，Ignacio Agarwala，Aseem [Anderson et al. 2000] Aguilar，P.V.Ahmet, Zeynep [Ahmet 等人，2011] Aigner, Roland Aish, Robert [Aish 1979, Aish and Noakes 1984, Noakes and Aish 1984] Akaoka, Eric Al-Haddad，Tristan [Mazalek 等人，2009] [Jensen and Aagaard 2018] [Verhaegh 等人，2013] [Mazalek 等人，2009] [Jensen and Aagaard 2018] [Verhaegh et al.
{"title":"Authors Cited","authors":"Richard, Arets, Saeed, Arif, Carrie, Arthur, Jessica, Astrahan","doi":"10.1145/3544564.3544580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544564.3544580","url":null,"abstract":"Ablart, Damien [Vi et al. 2017] Abler, Craig Abou Khaled, Omar [Angelini et al. 2018a, 2018b, 2018c] Abowd, Gregory D Ackerman, J. [Ackerman et al. 2000] Ackermann, Edith ADA [of Digital Art ADA] Adams, Matt Adelson, Edward [Follmer et al. 2011] Aedo, Ignacio Agarwala, Aseem [Anderson et al. 2000] Aguilar, P. V. Ahmet, Zeynep [Ahmet et al. 2011] Aigner, Roland Aish, Robert [Aish 1979, Aish and Noakes 1984, Noakes and Aish 1984] Akaoka, Eric Al-Haddad, Tristan [Mazalek et al. 2009] [Jensen and Aagaard 2018] [Verhaegh et al. 2013]","PeriodicalId":378123,"journal":{"name":"Weaving Fire into Form","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126030836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TEI—richer forms of human–computer interaction (HCI) that interlink the physical and digital worlds. For example, the vision of ubiquitous computing—profound interconnected technologies that disappear by “weaving themselves into the fabric of everyday life,” introduced by Weiser [1991] at Xerox PARC in 1991—has inspired numer ous researchers and practitioners. In a 2004 paper titled “Bottles: A Transparent Interface as a Tribute to Mark Weiser,” Hiroshi Ishii addressed a misinterpreta tion of the concept of ubiquitous computing, which focused on the “anything and anyplace computing” rather than on the transparency of technology and the user interface, and shared an inspiring personal communication with Mark Weiser that highlights a fruitful exchange of ideas. Weiser and Brown’s [1996] concept of calm technology was developed in parallel with the Tangible Bits vision [Ishii and Ullmer 1997] during the ’90s, emphasizing the engagement of both the center and the periphery of our attention and inspiring research on ambient displays. Another influential area is that of tangible augmented reality [Kato et al. 2001], particu larly Wellner’s [1993] DigitalDesk, which used projection to augment tangible paper objects on a desk. These ideas have also inspired the research area of Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, which combines novel interaction techniques and emerging technologies. We begin this chapter by surveying these research areas and their shared aspira tions. We also consider theoretical frameworks that view TEI as part of an emerging generation of HCI or of a larger interaction paradigm. Framing TEI
{"title":"Framing TEI","authors":"","doi":"10.1145/3544564.3544572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544564.3544572","url":null,"abstract":"TEI—richer forms of human–computer interaction (HCI) that interlink the physical and digital worlds. For example, the vision of ubiquitous computing—profound interconnected technologies that disappear by “weaving themselves into the fabric of everyday life,” introduced by Weiser [1991] at Xerox PARC in 1991—has inspired numer ous researchers and practitioners. In a 2004 paper titled “Bottles: A Transparent Interface as a Tribute to Mark Weiser,” Hiroshi Ishii addressed a misinterpreta tion of the concept of ubiquitous computing, which focused on the “anything and anyplace computing” rather than on the transparency of technology and the user interface, and shared an inspiring personal communication with Mark Weiser that highlights a fruitful exchange of ideas. Weiser and Brown’s [1996] concept of calm technology was developed in parallel with the Tangible Bits vision [Ishii and Ullmer 1997] during the ’90s, emphasizing the engagement of both the center and the periphery of our attention and inspiring research on ambient displays. Another influential area is that of tangible augmented reality [Kato et al. 2001], particu larly Wellner’s [1993] DigitalDesk, which used projection to augment tangible paper objects on a desk. These ideas have also inspired the research area of Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, which combines novel interaction techniques and emerging technologies. We begin this chapter by surveying these research areas and their shared aspira tions. We also consider theoretical frameworks that view TEI as part of an emerging generation of HCI or of a larger interaction paradigm. Framing TEI","PeriodicalId":378123,"journal":{"name":"Weaving Fire into Form","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123768699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
this may seem obvious and relates to longstanding ideas that are at the core of the philosophical movement of phenomenology [Moran 2000], the broad shift from a centralist (brain-centric) view of cognition to what Killeen and Glenberg [2010] call an “exocentric paradigm” represents a “sea change” that is still rolling out in the cognitive sciences [Hostetter and Alibali 2008]. We draw on this evolving view here, understanding cognition as a process that happens not in the brain alone (with perceptual and motor systems acting as mere inputs and outputs for thoughts happening in the head) but rather as a process that engages the brain, the body, and the physical and social environment together. This paradigm is sup ported by a wide array of empirical evidence as well as differing but related research approaches that have been characterized broadly by terms like “embodied cogni tion,” “situated cognition,” and “distributed cognition” [Hutchins 1996, Kirshner and Whitson 1997, Shapiro 2011], and will be discussed in some more detail in this chapter. Theories of Embodiment
这似乎是显而易见的，并且与现象学哲学运动核心的长期观点有关[Moran 2000]，从中心主义(大脑中心)认知观到Killeen和Glenberg[2010]所说的“外中心范式”的广泛转变代表了认知科学中仍在展开的“巨大变化”[Hostetter和Alibali 2008]。我们在这里借鉴了这一不断发展的观点，将认知理解为一个不仅仅发生在大脑中的过程(感知和运动系统仅仅作为大脑中发生的思想的输入和输出)，而是一个涉及大脑、身体、物理和社会环境的过程。这一范式得到了广泛的经验证据的支持，也得到了不同但相关的研究方法的支持，这些研究方法被广泛地描述为“具身认知”、“情境认知”和“分布式认知”[Hutchins 1996, Kirshner and Whitson 1997, Shapiro 2011]，并将在本章中进行更详细的讨论。化身理论
{"title":"Theories of Embodiment","authors":"","doi":"10.1145/3544564.3544573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544564.3544573","url":null,"abstract":"this may seem obvious and relates to longstanding ideas that are at the core of the philosophical movement of phenomenology [Moran 2000], the broad shift from a centralist (brain-centric) view of cognition to what Killeen and Glenberg [2010] call an “exocentric paradigm” represents a “sea change” that is still rolling out in the cognitive sciences [Hostetter and Alibali 2008]. We draw on this evolving view here, understanding cognition as a process that happens not in the brain alone (with perceptual and motor systems acting as mere inputs and outputs for thoughts happening in the head) but rather as a process that engages the brain, the body, and the physical and social environment together. This paradigm is sup ported by a wide array of empirical evidence as well as differing but related research approaches that have been characterized broadly by terms like “embodied cogni tion,” “situated cognition,” and “distributed cognition” [Hutchins 1996, Kirshner and Whitson 1997, Shapiro 2011], and will be discussed in some more detail in this chapter. Theories of Embodiment","PeriodicalId":378123,"journal":{"name":"Weaving Fire into Form","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116982336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：