IJC Heart and Vasculature最新文献

Background

Left ventricular (LV) overload is a frequent complication during VA-ECMO associated with poor outcomes. Many strategies of LV unloading have been documented but lack of evidence shows which is better. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare different LV unloading strategies.

Methods

We searched databases for all published studies on LV unloading strategies during VA-ECMO. The pre-defined primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

Results

45 observational studies (34235 patients) were included. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking values (SUCRA) demonstrated that compared to no unloading strategy (15.4 %), IABP (73.8 %), pLVAD (60.8 %), atrial septostomy (51.2 %), catheter venting (48.8 %) were all associated with decreased all-cause mortality, in which IABP and pLVAD existed statistical significance. For secondary outcomes, no unloading group had the shortest VA-ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, and the lower risk of complications compared with unloading strategies. IABP was associated with reducing VA-ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, and the risk of complications (except for hemolysis as the second best) compared with other unloading strategies.

Conclusions

LV unloading strategies during VA-ECMO were associated with improved survival compared to no unloading, but the tendency to increase the risk of various complications deserves more consideration.

Objects

To evaluate the association of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin with dementia incidence in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

Methods

Relevant studies were retrieved in databases including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Meta-analysis was then conducted using Stata 12.0 software.

Results

A total of 9 studies involving 447,644 AF patients were included. The results indicated that AF patients treated with DOACs had a lower incidence of dementia compared to those treated with warfarin (RR: 0.692, 95 % CI: 0.603–0.793, P = 0.000), This trend was observed in both age groups, <75 years old (RR: 0.770, 95 % CI: 0.639–0.929, P = 0.006) and ≥75 years old (RR: 0.858, 95 % CI: 0.756–0.973, P = 0.017), particularly in cases of Alzheimer's disease (RR: 0.798, 95 % CI: 0.684–0.932, P = 0.004) rather than vascular dementia (RR: 0.841, 95 % CI: 0.61–0.143, P = 0.269). Furthermore, patients taking rivaroxaban (RR: 0.680, 95 % CI: 0.624–0.741, P = 0.000) and apixaban (RR: 0.598, 95 % CI: 0.528–0.676, P = 0.000) instead of dabigatran (RR: 0.941, 95 % CI: 0.862–1.027, p = 0.17) exhibited a lower incidence of dementia than those took warfarin. Notably, AF patients taking rivaroxaban (RR: 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.67–0.84, P = 0.000) and apixaban (RR: 0.758, 95 % CI: 0.647–0.889, P = 0.001) had a lower incidence of dementia than those taking dabigatran, although the difference between trivaroxaban and apixaban was not statistically significant (RR:1.161, 95 % CI: 0.934–1.443, P = 0.018).

Conclusions

AF patients treated with DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban and apixaban, showed a lower incidence of dementia compared to those treated with warfarin, with a notable disparity observed when compared to dabigatran.

Background

Heart failure (HF) and inflammation have a bidirectional relation leading to activation and adaptation of multiple cellular lines, including leucocyte subtypes and platelets. We aimed to assess and compare the predictive value of the neutrophil–lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte-lymphocyte (MLR) and platelet-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios for all-cause long-term mortality in HF.

Methods

This is an observational retrospective cohort study that included patients from the HI-HF cohort that survived the initial hospitalization. Vital status and survival time were assessed in June 2020.

Results

We analyzed 1018 HF patients with a mean age of 72.32 ± 10.29 years and 53.54 % women. All-cause long-term mortality was 38.21 % after a median follow-up time of 68 [38 – 82] months. NLR (AUC 0.667, 95 %CI 0.637 – 0.697), MLR (AUC 0.670, 95 %CI 0.640 – 0.700) and PLR (AUC 0.606, 95 %CI 0.574 – 0.636) were predictors of all-cause mortality. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, NLR≥3.56 was the only hematological index independent predictor of fatality (HR 1.36, 95 %CI 1.05 – 1.76).

Conclusions

Of the three hematological indices, NLR was the only independent predictor of all-cause long-term mortality of HF patients. We suggest NLR≥3.56 as an auxiliary prognostic biomarker for the evaluation of HF patients.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are characterized by permanent dilatation of the abdominal aorta, which is accompanied by inflammation, degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and disruption of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) homeostasis. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is involved in the regulation of inflammation, oxidative stress and VSMC apoptosis, all of which are critical factors in AAA development. Although several studies have revealed the occurrence of ER stress in AAA development, the specific biological functions of ER stress in AAA development remain largely unknown. Given that targeting ER stress is a promising strategy for treating AAAs, further investigation of the physiological and pathological roles of ER stress in AAA development is warranted.

Backgrounds

It is well known that epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to investigate whether EAT density (EAT-d) is associated with the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) after aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods

We retrospectively studied 143 patients who underwent simple AVR at Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command between June 2020 to August 2023. All patients received cardiac coronary artery computed tomography (CT) before surgery. EAT-d, EAT volume and EAT volume index (EATVI) were quantitatively measured and analysed using EAT analysis software (TIMESlicePro). POAF was detected by 7-day Holter monitoring.

Results

Of 143 patients undergoing AVR, 55 patients (38.46 %) developed POAF after surgery. Male patients and patients who had elder age or smoking history were more likely to develop POAF. On univariable analysis, patients developed POAF had significantly more EAT-d (−79.19(−83.91, −74.69) vs. −81.54(−87.16, −76.76); P = 0.043) and EATVI (4.14(3.32,5.03) vs. 3.90(2.70,4.51); P = 0.043) than patients without POAF. On multivariable analysis, EAT-d and age were independent risk factors for POAF (odds ratio (OR): 1.186, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.062–1.324, P = 0.002; OR: 1.119, 95 %CI: 1.055–1.187, P < 0.001). Furthermore, EAT-d was significantly associated with age. Furthermore, EAT-d was associated with cardiac structure changes, such as cardiac left ventricular end-diastolic, left ventricular end-systolic volumes and NT-proBNP before surgery.

Conclusion

EAT-d and age are independent predictors of POAF after simple AVR. EAT-d was related with age.

Background

Concerns have been raised about cardiac inflammation in patients with long COVID-19, particularly those with myocardial injury during the acute phase of the disease. This study was conducted to examine myopericardial involvement, detected by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Methods

Adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who presented myocardial injury or increased D-dimers were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were invited to undergo CMR imaging examination after discharge. During follow-up, patients with nonischemic myocardial or pericardial involvement detected on the first CMR imaging examination underwent second examinations. CMR imaging findings were compared with those of a control group of healthy patients with no comorbidity.

Results

Of 180 included patients, 53 underwent CMR imaging examination. The mean age was 58.4 ± 18.3 years, and 73.6 % were male. Myocardial and pericardial LGE was reported in 43.4 % and 35.8 % of patients, respectively. Nonischemic myocardial or pericardial involvement was reported in 26 (49.1 %) patients. The prevalence of pericardial LGE was associated inversely with the interval between hospital discharge and CMR. COVID-19 survivors had higher end-systolic volume indices (ESVis) and lower left-ventricular ejection fractions than did healthy controls. Seventeen patients underwent follow-up CMR imaging; the end-diastolic volume index, ESVi, and prevalence of pericardial LGE, but not that of nonischemic LGE, were reduced.

Conclusion

Among COVID-19 survivors with myocardial injury during the acute phase of the disease, the incidences of nonischemic myocardial and pericardial LGE and CMR imaging–detected signs of cardiac remodeling, partially reversed during follow-up, were high.

Introduction

Data on treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has evolved with guidance from national societies beginning around 2018. Given emerging guidance and relatively uncommon presentation of SCAD, we hypothesized that a specialized SCAD clinic would improve guidance-based care.

Methods

We utilized a system-wide electronic medical record search to identify individuals with SCAD diagnosis from 2018 to 2023. All diagnostic angiograms were reviewed to verify diagnosis. We analyzed frequency of guidance-based care since 2018 system-wide. We also compared guidance-based care for individuals with index visits to the SCAD outpatient clinic as compared to non-SCAD clinic providers from initiation of specialty clinic in 2021.

Results

Differences were observed in pregnancy and contraception discussions (88 % vs 0 %, p < 0.001) among pre-menopausal individuals in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics. Safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women was addressed more by SCAD clinic providers (85 % vs 7 %, p < 0.001). There was more fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) screening in SCAD clinic (100 % vs 30 %, p < 0.001). Among individuals with migraines, there was more discussion of triggering medications (triptans) in SCAD clinic (80 % vs 14 %, p = 0.008). In individuals prescribed statins not by primary prevention guidelines and without atherosclerosis, there was a trend toward more discussion of statin use in SCAD clinic follow up vs non-SCAD clinic providers (63 % vs 17 %, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Individuals with follow up in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics were more likely to have future pregnancy and contraception counseling, discussion of HRT safety, and FMD screening following index outpatient visit. Future quality improvement initiatives will target these aspects of guidance-based care among non-SCAD clinic providers with integration into cardiology fellow training.

Background

Conventional stented, rapid deployment and new-generation stented valves are now available for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). New-generation devices feature advanced tissue treatment for theoretical prolonged durability and a new stent design able to expand in case of future transcatheter Valve-in-Valve. Aim of this retrospective, multicenter, propensity-weighted study was to compare early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of these three different bioprostheses.

Methods

We analyzed data of 2589 patients from two national multicenter registries and one Institutional database. Study devices were Magna Ease, Intuity/Intuity Elite and Inspiris Resilia (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and were implanted in 296 (11.4 %), 1688 (65.2 %) and 605 (23.4 %) patients, respectively. A propensity score weighting approach was employed.

Results

In isolated SAVR, aortic cross clamp (ACC) time was shorter for Intuity (Magna Ease: 87, Intuity: 55, Inspiris: 70 min; Magna Ease vs. Intuity: p < 0.001; Inspiris vs. Intuity: p < 0.001). Overall mortality was 2 %, 1.7 % and 0.5 % in Magna Ease, Intuity and Inspiris groups, respectively (Magna Ease vs. Intuity: p = 0.476; Inspiris vs. Intuity: p = 0.395); permanent pace-maker implantation rate was lower for Inspiris (Magna Ease: 6 %, Intuity: 6 %, Inspiris: 2 %; Magna Ease vs. Intuity: p = 0.679; Inspiris vs. Intuity: p < 0.001). Median mean gradients were 13, 10 and 10 mmHg for Magna Ease, Intuity and Inspiris, respectively (Magna Ease vs. Intuity: p < 0.001; Inspiris vs. Intuity: p = 0.13).

Conclusions

All study devices provide excellent early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Inspiris shows low rates of permanent pace-maker implantation and its transaortic gradients are similar to rapid-deployment valves and lower than Magna Ease.