Pub Date : 2018-08-10DOI: 10.14195/2182-8830_6-2_2
M. Kirschenbaum
Roughly a decade after having cycled off the board of the Electronic Literature Organization, Kirschenbaum returned to deliver, at the 2017 ELO meeting in Oporto, an eerily accurate juxtaposition of the Organization’s affinities with the short-lived era of progressive rock. The result is an imaginative excess whose only precursor (in print scholarship) might be Mark Weingarten’s and Tyson Correl’s Yes in the Answer (2013), featuring acclaimed novelists of the 1980s such as Rick Moody and Joe Meno, musicians such as Nathan Larson, and Peter Case, and the music historian, Jim DeRogatis, cited here. This text is a lightly revised transcript of the talk. Not reproducible, in print, is the solid wall of sound that accompanied Kirschenbaum’s presentation.
离开电子文学组织(Electronic Literature Organization)董事会大约十年后，基尔申鲍姆又回来了，在波尔图举行的2017年电子文学组织会议上，他将该组织与短暂的进步摇滚时代的关系精确地并列在一起，令人惊讶。其结果是一种想象力的过度，其唯一的先驱(在印刷学术上)可能是马克·温加滕和泰森·科雷尔的《答案是肯定》(2013)，其中包括20世纪80年代著名小说家里克·穆迪和乔·梅诺，音乐家内森·拉尔森和彼得·凯斯，以及音乐历史学家吉姆·罗加蒂斯(这里引用)。这篇课文是那次谈话的略加修改的文字记录。Kirschenbaum的演讲伴随着坚实的声音墙，在印刷中是不可复制的。
{"title":"ELO and the Electric Light Orchestra: Electronic Literature Lessons from Prog Rock","authors":"M. Kirschenbaum","doi":"10.14195/2182-8830_6-2_2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_6-2_2","url":null,"abstract":"Roughly a decade after having cycled off the board of the Electronic Literature Organization, Kirschenbaum returned to deliver, at the 2017 ELO meeting in Oporto, an eerily accurate juxtaposition of the Organization’s affinities with the short-lived era of progressive rock. The result is an imaginative excess whose only precursor (in print scholarship) might be Mark Weingarten’s and Tyson Correl’s Yes in the Answer (2013), featuring acclaimed novelists of the 1980s such as Rick Moody and Joe Meno, musicians such as Nathan Larson, and Peter Case, and the music historian, Jim DeRogatis, cited here. This text is a lightly revised transcript of the talk. Not reproducible, in print, is the solid wall of sound that accompanied Kirschenbaum’s presentation.","PeriodicalId":381583,"journal":{"name":"Post-Digital","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114176314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-08-10DOI: 10.14195/2182-8830_6-1_1
F. W. Block
The following discussion aims to reflect on how electronic literature and affiliated or related fields describe themselves paratextually. I will argue that the social construction of ‘electronic literature’ is dominated by its systemic self-description. The paratextual construction basically works with the ascription of the genre name ‘electronic literature’ and discursive descriptions or reflections to phenomena of artistic practice and has been institutionalized in no small part by the Electronic Literature Organization. The argument is developed by observing paratextual practices in founding narratives, archives and collections related to the ELO. This perspective is contextualized by looking at self-descriptions in the pre-history of e-lit within the artistic program of poietic experimentation.
{"title":"Electronic Literature as Paratextual Construction","authors":"F. W. Block","doi":"10.14195/2182-8830_6-1_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_6-1_1","url":null,"abstract":"The following discussion aims to reflect on how electronic literature and affiliated or related fields describe themselves paratextually. I will argue that the social construction of ‘electronic literature’ is dominated by its systemic self-description. The paratextual construction basically works with the ascription of the genre name ‘electronic literature’ and discursive descriptions or reflections to phenomena of artistic practice and has been institutionalized in no small part by the Electronic Literature Organization. The argument is developed by observing paratextual practices in founding narratives, archives and collections related to the ELO. This perspective is contextualized by looking at self-descriptions in the pre-history of e-lit within the artistic program of poietic experimentation.","PeriodicalId":381583,"journal":{"name":"Post-Digital","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132903403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-08-10DOI: 10.14195/2182-8830_6-2_1
E. Tisselli
This text explores the material implications of electronic reading and writing in the Anthropocene. It does so by briefly examining the consequences that the production and usage of electronic devices has on ecosystems and social contexts. Different perspectives on how a reader or writer may deal with the negative effects of sociotechnical systems are offered: restraint, pharmacological awareness and togetherness. Such perspectives can be transformed into reading and writing tools for the Anthropocene that may allow readers and writers of electronic literature to integrate the notion of an extended community, that is, an intimate and paradoxical complicity with nearby and remote humans and non-humans, and invite them into the digital text.
{"title":"The Heaviness of Light","authors":"E. Tisselli","doi":"10.14195/2182-8830_6-2_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_6-2_1","url":null,"abstract":"This text explores the material implications of electronic reading and writing in the Anthropocene. It does so by briefly examining the consequences that the production and usage of electronic devices has on ecosystems and social contexts. Different perspectives on how a reader or writer may deal with the negative effects of sociotechnical systems are offered: restraint, pharmacological awareness and togetherness. Such perspectives can be transformed into reading and writing tools for the Anthropocene that may allow readers and writers of electronic literature to integrate the notion of an extended community, that is, an intimate and paradoxical complicity with nearby and remote humans and non-humans, and invite them into the digital text.","PeriodicalId":381583,"journal":{"name":"Post-Digital","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131257716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5040/9781474286787-063
Stuart Moulthrop
{"title":"Just Not the Future: Electronic Literature after the Fall","authors":"Stuart Moulthrop","doi":"10.5040/9781474286787-063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474286787-063","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":381583,"journal":{"name":"Post-Digital","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116308432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5040/9781474286787-021
{"title":"ebr news—ghouls’ night out edition","authors":"","doi":"10.5040/9781474286787-021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474286787-021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":381583,"journal":{"name":"Post-Digital","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125254615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：