首页 > 最新文献

Review of Contemporary Philosophy最新文献

英文 中文
COVID-19 Threat Perceptions and Willingness to Get Vaccinated: Efficacy, Safety, and Trust Concerns COVID-19威胁认知和接种疫苗意愿:有效性、安全性和信任问题
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp2020215
K. Mitchell
The purpose of this study was to empirically examine COVID-19 threat perceptions and willingness to get vaccinated in relation to efficacy, safety, and trust concerns. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from ASPE, CBS, Hertfordshire County Council, KFF, OECD, Pew Research Center, Purpose, UN, and University of Florida/CPIC, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding attitudes and intentions toward COVID-19 vaccination during such a public health crisis. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
本研究的目的是实证研究COVID-19威胁的认知和接种疫苗的意愿与有效性、安全性和信任问题的关系。我利用从ASPE、哥伦比亚广播公司、赫特福德郡议会、KFF、经合组织、皮尤研究中心、Purpose、联合国和佛罗里达大学/CPIC收集的数据来建立我的论点，并对在这种公共卫生危机期间对COVID-19疫苗接种的态度和意图进行了分析和估计。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"COVID-19 Threat Perceptions and Willingness to Get Vaccinated: Efficacy, Safety, and Trust Concerns","authors":"K. Mitchell","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020215","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to empirically examine COVID-19 threat perceptions and willingness to get vaccinated in relation to efficacy, safety, and trust concerns. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from ASPE, CBS, Hertfordshire County Council, KFF, OECD, Pew Research Center, Purpose, UN, and University of Florida/CPIC, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding attitudes and intentions toward COVID-19 vaccination during such a public health crisis. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68376601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Misperception, Distress, and Skepticism COVID-19疫苗犹豫:误解、困扰和怀疑
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp2020216
K. C. Morris
This paper analyzes the outcomes of an exploratory review of the current research on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in relation to misperception, distress, and skepticism. The data used for this study was obtained and replicated from previous research conducted by ASPE, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, Pew Research Center, and WHO. I performed analyses and made estimates regarding drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reluctance, and refusal. Data collected from 6,600 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
本文分析了当前关于COVID-19疫苗犹豫与误解、困扰和怀疑有关的研究的探索性综述结果。本研究使用的数据是从ASPE、Healthwatch Bexley、KFF、皮尤研究中心和世卫组织先前进行的研究中获得和复制的。我对COVID-19疫苗犹豫、不情愿和拒绝的驱动因素进行了分析和估计。从6600名受访者中收集的数据根据研究模型进行了测试。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Misperception, Distress, and Skepticism","authors":"K. C. Morris","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020216","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the outcomes of an exploratory review of the current research on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in relation to misperception, distress, and skepticism. The data used for this study was obtained and replicated from previous research conducted by ASPE, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, Pew Research Center, and WHO. I performed analyses and made estimates regarding drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reluctance, and refusal. Data collected from 6,600 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68376323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Leveraging Green Finance for Low-Carbon Energy, Sustainable Economic Development, and Climate Change Mitigation during the COVID-19 Pandemic 在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间利用绿色金融促进低碳能源、可持续经济发展和减缓气候变化
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp20202112
L. Ionescu
This article presents an empirical study carried out to evaluate and analyze green finance for low-carbon energy, sustainable economic development, and climate change mitigation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from NGFS and UN, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding the transition to a low-carbon/sustainable economy. Data collected from 6,500 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
本文以新冠肺炎疫情为背景，对绿色金融在低碳能源、经济可持续发展和减缓气候变化方面的作用进行了实证评估和分析。根据NGFS和联合国收集的数据，我对向低碳/可持续经济转型进行了分析和估计。从6500名受访者中收集的数据根据研究模型进行了测试。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"Leveraging Green Finance for Low-Carbon Energy, Sustainable Economic Development, and Climate Change Mitigation during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"L. Ionescu","doi":"10.22381/rcp20202112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp20202112","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an empirical study carried out to evaluate and analyze green finance for low-carbon energy, sustainable economic development, and climate change mitigation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from NGFS and UN, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding the transition to a low-carbon/sustainable economy. Data collected from 6,500 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68375701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
The Rehabilitation of the Concept of Public Good: Reappraising the Attacks from Liberalism and Neo-Liberalism from a Poststructuralist Perspective 公共产品概念的复兴:后结构主义视角下对自由主义与新自由主义攻击的再评价
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp2020211
{"title":"The Rehabilitation of the Concept of Public Good: Reappraising the Attacks from Liberalism and Neo-Liberalism from a Poststructuralist Perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020211","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68375784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
COVID-19 Vaccine Risk Beliefs, Perceptions, Attitudes, and Intentions COVID-19疫苗风险信念、认知、态度和意图
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp2020214
L. Bailey, M. Grupač, J. Sosedova
Empirical evidence on COVID-19 vaccine risk beliefs, perceptions, attitudes, and intentions has been scarcely documented in the literature. Using and replicating data from CBS, CEAL, KFF, McKinsey, MSDH/OPHHE, OCHCA, and WHO, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding hesitancy in getting a COVID-19 vaccine. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
关于COVID-19疫苗风险信念、观念、态度和意图的经验证据在文献中几乎没有记录。我们使用并复制了CBS、CEAL、KFF、麦肯锡、MSDH/OPHHE、OCHCA和世卫组织的数据，对接种COVID-19疫苗的犹豫进行了分析和估计。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Risk Beliefs, Perceptions, Attitudes, and Intentions","authors":"L. Bailey, M. Grupač, J. Sosedova","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020214","url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evidence on COVID-19 vaccine risk beliefs, perceptions, attitudes, and intentions has been scarcely documented in the literature. Using and replicating data from CBS, CEAL, KFF, McKinsey, MSDH/OPHHE, OCHCA, and WHO, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding hesitancy in getting a COVID-19 vaccine. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68376475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Pervasive Misinformation, COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, and Lack of Trust in Science 普遍存在的错误信息、COVID-19疫苗犹豫以及对科学缺乏信任
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp2020218
V. Morgan, A. Zaušková, K. Janoskova
Employing recent research results covering pervasive misinformation, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and lack of trust in science, and building our argument by drawing on data collected from Horizon Research, KFF, OECD, and RSC, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and behaviors. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
利用最近的研究成果，包括普遍存在的错误信息、COVID-19疫苗犹豫和对科学缺乏信任，并通过借鉴地平线研究、KFF、经合组织和RSC收集的数据来构建我们的论点，我们对COVID-19疫苗的态度和行为进行了分析和估计。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"Pervasive Misinformation, COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, and Lack of Trust in Science","authors":"V. Morgan, A. Zaušková, K. Janoskova","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020218","url":null,"abstract":"Employing recent research results covering pervasive misinformation, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and lack of trust in science, and building our argument by drawing on data collected from Horizon Research, KFF, OECD, and RSC, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and behaviors. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68376732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
COVID-19 Vaccine Education: Behavioral and Socio-Demographic Factors Related to Vaccine Uptake and Hesitancy COVID-19疫苗教育:与疫苗接种和犹豫相关的行为和社会人口因素
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp20202110
R. Balica
Based on an in-depth survey of the literature, the purpose of the paper is to explore COVID-19 vaccine education as regards behavioral and socio-demographic factors related to vaccine uptake and hesitancy. Using and replicating data from Horizon Research, Jones et al. (2021), KFF, and WHO, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding perceptual barriers to widespread COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
在深入查阅文献的基础上，本研究旨在探讨COVID-19疫苗教育中与疫苗接种和犹豫相关的行为和社会人口因素。我使用并复制了Horizon Research、Jones等人(2021年)、KFF和世卫组织的数据，对广泛接种COVID-19疫苗的感知障碍进行了分析和估计。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Education: Behavioral and Socio-Demographic Factors Related to Vaccine Uptake and Hesitancy","authors":"R. Balica","doi":"10.22381/rcp20202110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp20202110","url":null,"abstract":"Based on an in-depth survey of the literature, the purpose of the paper is to explore COVID-19 vaccine education as regards behavioral and socio-demographic factors related to vaccine uptake and hesitancy. Using and replicating data from Horizon Research, Jones et al. (2021), KFF, and WHO, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding perceptual barriers to widespread COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68375871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Hesitancy towards Receiving a COVID-19 Vaccine: Concerns about Side Effects and Safety, Mistrust in Government and Health Authorities, and Perceived Susceptibility and Severity of the Virus 对接种COVID-19疫苗的犹豫:对副作用和安全性的担忧，对政府和卫生当局的不信任，以及对病毒易感性和严重性的感知
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp20202111
R. Wells, M. Vochozka, V. Stehel
We draw on a substantial body of theoretical and empirical research on hesitancy towards receiving a COVID-19 vaccine in terms of concerns about side effects and safety, mistrust in government and health authorities, and perceived susceptibility and severity of the virus, and to explore this, we inspected, used, and replicated survey data from The British Academy, CEAL, de Beaumont, Jones et al. (2021), KFF, Medscape, MSDH/OPHHE, The Royal Society, Tegan and Sara Foun-dation, and W2O, performing analyses and making estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, attitudes and behaviors. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
我们借鉴了大量关于对接种COVID-19疫苗的犹豫的理论和实证研究，包括对副作用和安全性的担忧，对政府和卫生当局的不信任，以及对病毒的易感性和严重性的感知，为了探索这一点，我们检查、使用和复制了来自英国科学院、CEAL、de Beaumont、Jones等人(2021)、KFF、Medscape、MSDH/OPHHE、皇家学会、Tegan和Sara基金会以及W2O的调查数据。对COVID-19疫苗的认知、态度和行为进行分析和估计。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"Hesitancy towards Receiving a COVID-19 Vaccine: Concerns about Side Effects and Safety, Mistrust in Government and Health Authorities, and Perceived Susceptibility and Severity of the Virus","authors":"R. Wells, M. Vochozka, V. Stehel","doi":"10.22381/rcp20202111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp20202111","url":null,"abstract":"We draw on a substantial body of theoretical and empirical research on hesitancy towards receiving a COVID-19 vaccine in terms of concerns about side effects and safety, mistrust in government and health authorities, and perceived susceptibility and severity of the virus, and to explore this, we inspected, used, and replicated survey data from The British Academy, CEAL, de Beaumont, Jones et al. (2021), KFF, Medscape, MSDH/OPHHE, The Royal Society, Tegan and Sara Foun-dation, and W2O, performing analyses and making estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, attitudes and behaviors. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68375958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Language of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Public Health Misinformation: Distrust, Unwillingness, and Uncertainty COVID-19疫苗犹豫和公共卫生错误信息的语言:不信任，不愿意和不确定性
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp2020217
G. Lăzăroiu, R. Mihăilă, L. Braniște
The aim of this paper is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the language of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and public health misinformation in relation to distrust, unwillingness, and uncertainty. Using and replicating data from CEAL, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, MissionSquare Research Institute, MSDH/ OPHHE, OECD, Pandemic Action Network, and WHO, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistance. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
本文的目的是综合和分析COVID-19疫苗犹豫和公共卫生错误信息与不信任，不愿意和不确定性相关的语言的现有证据。我们使用并复制了来自CEAL、Healthwatch Bexley、KFF、MissionSquare研究所、MSDH/ OPHHE、经合组织、大流行行动网络和世卫组织的数据，对COVID-19疫苗接受度、犹豫度和耐药性进行了分析和估计。在适当情况下，对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
{"title":"The Language of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Public Health Misinformation: Distrust, Unwillingness, and Uncertainty","authors":"G. Lăzăroiu, R. Mihăilă, L. Braniște","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020217","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the language of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and public health misinformation in relation to distrust, unwillingness, and uncertainty. Using and replicating data from CEAL, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, MissionSquare Research Institute, MSDH/ OPHHE, OECD, Pandemic Action Network, and WHO, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistance. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68376724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Smartphone Addiction Risk, Anxiety Symptom Severity, and Depression Psychopathology 智能手机成瘾风险、焦虑症状严重程度和抑郁精神病理学
Q1 Arts and Humanities
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.22381/rcp1920205
{"title":"Smartphone Addiction Risk, Anxiety Symptom Severity, and Depression Psychopathology","authors":"","doi":"10.22381/rcp1920205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp1920205","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68376008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
类型
全部 化学•材料 生命科学 医学 物理 工程技术 环境•农林 材料科学 地球科学 法学 管理学 化学 环境科学与生态学 计算机科学 教育学 经济学 农林科学 人文科学 生物学 数学 物理与天体物理 心理学 综合性期刊 其他 工业工程 理学 历史学 农学 文学 信息工程
数据库
全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley
期刊
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
﹀
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们：info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1