Der Nervenarzt最新文献

Objective: The intention to minimize coercive measures requires a comprehensive understanding of the influencing factors. The aim of the present work was to examine the association between substance use and the use of coercive measures.

Methods: All coercive measures carried out on acute psychiatric wards of the Charité Campus Mitte in 2019 were examined, with a particular focus on the association with substance use disorders.

Results: In 106 cases (92 patients) out of a total of 1232 cases (1131 patients), coercive measures were used, mainly admissions according to PsychKG (94) and BGB (21), more rarely isolation (23) or mechanical restraint (18). Acute intoxication was present in approximately one third of cases with coercive measures and a history of substance use disorder in two thirds, most often with alcohol and/or cannabis. In contrast, 9% of 1232 treatment cases presented with acute intoxication and 36% with substance use disorders in general.

Conclusion: The present work delivers empirical data confirming the clinically known association between intoxication and the use of coercive measures.

Background: Due to high levels of stress, a practical course on stress management in medical school was offered to preclinical medical students at the Justus-Liebig University in Giessen up to 2019. In addition to autogenic training with specific resolution formulas, learning strategies, examination anxiety, and stress management were taught.

Objective: The aim was to determine the factors influencing the efficacy of the course as well as predictive factors favoring the success of preventive strategies for medical students.

Methods: A total of 81 medical students with an average age of M = 25.4 years participated in this study, with 32.1% being male. The pre-post surveys were conducted anonymously with PSQ, BDI, PHQ‑9, HADS, SF-12 and the STQL‑S.

Results: With respect to satisfaction, stress, anxiety, and depression, a significant improvement was achieved at high effect levels (Cohen's d > 1). Initially, 35% of the students suffered from clinically relevant depression; these also showed a significantly higher stress level at the end of the course. This also applies to students with low study or life satisfaction. There were significant interactions of stress reduction depending on the existence of adequate learning techniques as well as anxiety symptoms but less often due to the existence of adequate stress management strategies.

Conclusion: As predictive factors against a high stress level in medical students, a high study satisfaction and a high life satisfaction as well as low depression values could be confirmed. Relevant factors contributing to the efficacy of the course are learning strategies and coping with examination phobia. Theoretical information concerning stress management was found to be less helpful.

Background: Based on international randomized controlled trials (RCT) the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) recommends acute treatment in the domestic environment (AHU) and intensive outreach treatment (IAB) with the highest level of evidence; however, due to large differences in national healthcare systems the transference of results from international studies to the healthcare systems in Germany, Austria and Switzerland could be limited.

Objective: Evaluation of studies on outreach psychiatric treatment forms in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and discussion of the results in the light of international evidence.

Material and methods: A systematic literature search for clinical trials on outreach community treatment from Germany, Austria and Switzerland was conducted in the PubMed database.

Results: A total of 19 publications were identified which could be assigned to 5 publications on 4 studies with 2857 patients on AHU and 14 publications on 10 studies with 3207 patients on IAB. The studies on AHU showed this treatment form to be superior regarding the duration of inpatient stay and healthcare costs. The studies on IAB showed more positive outcomes in comparison to controls regarding symptoms, severity of illness, substance abuse, functioning level, remission, satisfaction with treatment, quality of life, healthcare costs, work and housing situations.

Conclusion: The studies from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland suggest that outreach community treatment is superior regarding several outcome parameters. Thus, there are no indications suggesting that international evidence could not be valid for these countries. Additionally, with one RCT for AHU and one for IAB the requirements for an evidence level of 1b for outreach community treatment in the healthcare systems in question are fulfilled.