首页 > 最新文献

Rural policy brief最新文献

英文 中文
Demographic and economic characteristics associated with sole county pharmacy closures, 2006-2010. 2006-2010年单个县药房关闭相关的人口和经济特征。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-11-01
Paula Weigel, Fred Ullrich, Keith Mueller

Key Findings. Twenty-five counties lost their sole community pharmacy between May 2006 and December 2010. Among these: (1) The average population density is 10.4 persons per square mile, compared to 87.4 for the United States. (2) The average population decreased by 1.6% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the average decrease was 2.4%. (3) The population age 65 years and older increased 5.4% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the 65-and-older population increased 2.1%. (4) The average change in the percentage of persons in poverty increased by 0.6 points between 2000 and 2010, from 15.5% to 16.1%, compared to a 4.0 point increase (11.3% to 15.3%) for the United States. (5) The average percentage of people younger than 65 years without health insurance was 24.6% in 2010, compared to 16.2% for the United States. (6) Nineteen of the 25 counties were designated "whole county" Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), meaning there was a shortage of primary medical care physicians across the entire county. (7) The average number of active doctors per 1,000 persons was 0.44, compared to 2.86 for the United States. Six of the 25 counties (24%) had no active MDs or DOs in 2010.

关键的发现。从2006年5月到2010年12月,25个县失去了他们唯一的社区药房。其中包括:(1)平均人口密度为每平方英里10.4人,而美国为87.4人。(2) 2000 - 2010年平均人口减少1.6%。除去最大的县,平均下降2.4%。(3) 2000 - 2010年,65岁及以上人口增长5.4%。除去最大的县,65岁及以上的人口增长了2.1%。(4) 2000年至2010年间,贫困人口百分比的平均变化增加了0.6个百分点,从15.5%增加到16.1%,而美国增加了4.0个百分点(从11.3%增加到15.3%)。(5) 2010年,中国65岁以下无医疗保险人口的平均比例为24.6%,而美国为16.2%。(6) 25个县中有19个县被指定为“全县”卫生专业人员短缺地区(hpsa),这意味着整个县都缺乏初级医疗保健医生。(7)平均每千名在职医生人数为0.44人,而美国为2.86人。2010年,25个县中有6个县(24%)没有活跃的临床医生或临床医生。
{"title":"Demographic and economic characteristics associated with sole county pharmacy closures, 2006-2010.","authors":"Paula Weigel,&nbsp;Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Findings. Twenty-five counties lost their sole community pharmacy between May 2006 and December 2010. Among these: (1) The average population density is 10.4 persons per square mile, compared to 87.4 for the United States. (2) The average population decreased by 1.6% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the average decrease was 2.4%. (3) The population age 65 years and older increased 5.4% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the 65-and-older population increased 2.1%. (4) The average change in the percentage of persons in poverty increased by 0.6 points between 2000 and 2010, from 15.5% to 16.1%, compared to a 4.0 point increase (11.3% to 15.3%) for the United States. (5) The average percentage of people younger than 65 years without health insurance was 24.6% in 2010, compared to 16.2% for the United States. (6) Nineteen of the 25 counties were designated \"whole county\" Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), meaning there was a shortage of primary medical care physicians across the entire county. (7) The average number of active doctors per 1,000 persons was 0.44, compared to 2.86 for the United States. Six of the 25 counties (24%) had no active MDs or DOs in 2010.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 15","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
March 2013: Medicare Advantage update. 2013年3月:医疗保险优势更新。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-09-01
Sarah Sayavong, Leah Kemper, Abigail Barker, Timothy McBride

Key Data Findings. (1) From March 2012 to March 2013, rural enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) and other prepaid plans increased by over 200,000 enrollees, to more than 1.9 million. (2) Preferred provider organization (PPO) plan enrollment increased to nearly one million enrollees, accounting for more than 51% of the rural MA market (up from 48% in March 2012). (3) Health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment continued to grow in 2013, with over 31% of the rural MA market, while private fee-for-service (PFFS) plan enrollment decreased to less than 10% of market share. (4) Despite recent changes to MA payment, rural MA enrollment continues to increase.

关键数据发现。(1) 2012年3月至2013年3月,农村医保优势(MA)和其他预付费计划参保人数增加了20多万,达到190多万。(2)首选提供者组织(PPO)计划参保人数增加到近100万,占农村MA市场的51%以上(2012年3月为48%)。(3) 2013年,健康维护组织(HMO)参保人数持续增长,占农村MA市场的31%以上,而私人付费服务计划(PFFS)参保人数下降至不足10%的市场份额。(4)尽管最近MA支付方式发生了变化,但农村MA入学人数仍在继续增加。
{"title":"March 2013: Medicare Advantage update.","authors":"Sarah Sayavong,&nbsp;Leah Kemper,&nbsp;Abigail Barker,&nbsp;Timothy McBride","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Data Findings. (1) From March 2012 to March 2013, rural enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) and other prepaid plans increased by over 200,000 enrollees, to more than 1.9 million. (2) Preferred provider organization (PPO) plan enrollment increased to nearly one million enrollees, accounting for more than 51% of the rural MA market (up from 48% in March 2012). (3) Health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment continued to grow in 2013, with over 31% of the rural MA market, while private fee-for-service (PFFS) plan enrollment decreased to less than 10% of market share. (4) Despite recent changes to MA payment, rural MA enrollment continues to increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 14","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Frontier Extended Stay Clinic model: a potential health care delivery alternative for small rural communities. 边境延长住院诊所模式:一个潜在的卫生保健提供替代小农村社区。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-08-01
A Clinton MacKinney, Fred Ullrich, Keith J Mueller

Key Findings. (1) The Frontier Extended Stay Clinic (FESC) demonstration project provided expanded emergency services and extended clinic stays to remote rural communities. (2) Although the FESC demonstration ended this year, the FESC model may be appropriate in rural communities other than the five original demonstration sites. (3) FESCs may also be alternatives to very low-volume rural hospitals.

关键的发现。(1)边境延长门诊示范项目为偏远农村社区提供了扩大的急诊服务和延长的门诊时间。(2)尽管FESC示范点于今年结束,但FESC模式可能适用于五个原始示范点以外的农村社区。(3) fesc也可以替代容量非常小的农村医院。
{"title":"The Frontier Extended Stay Clinic model: a potential health care delivery alternative for small rural communities.","authors":"A Clinton MacKinney,&nbsp;Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Keith J Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Findings. (1) The Frontier Extended Stay Clinic (FESC) demonstration project provided expanded emergency services and extended clinic stays to remote rural communities. (2) Although the FESC demonstration ended this year, the FESC model may be appropriate in rural communities other than the five original demonstration sites. (3) FESCs may also be alternatives to very low-volume rural hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 9","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Causes and consequences of rural pharmacy closures: a multi-case study. 农村药房关闭的原因和后果:一个多案例研究。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-08-01
Kelli Todd, Katie Westfall, Bill Doucette, Fred Ullrich, Keith Mueller

Local rural pharmacies provide essential pharmacy and clinical services to their communities. Pharmacists play a critical role in the continuum of care for rural residents, and the loss of a local pharmacy may impact access to prescription drugs and clinical care. This policy brief identifies factors that contributed to the closing of six pharmacies and describes how the affected communities adapted to losing locally based services. Key Findings. (1) Five out of the six pharmacies studied closed due to retirement and/or difficulties in recruiting a successor. (2) In five of the six communities, residents now either drive to the nearest pharmacy or use mail-order to receive their prescriptions and, in some instances, receive their prescriptions through a courier service from a pharmacy in a nearby town. (3) Access to pharmacy services in these communities is of most concern for individuals with limited mobility and those who lack a support system that can pick up and deliver their prescriptions (e.g., the elderly and people with acute conditions).

当地农村药房为其社区提供基本的药房和临床服务。药剂师在农村居民的连续护理中起着至关重要的作用,失去当地药房可能会影响获得处方药和临床护理。本政策简报确定了导致六家药店关闭的因素,并描述了受影响社区如何适应失去当地服务的情况。关键的发现。(1)研究的6家药店中有5家因退休和/或难以招募继任者而关闭。(2)在6个社区中,有5个社区的居民现在要么开车去最近的药房,要么用邮购的方式领取处方,在某些情况下,他们通过快递服务从附近城镇的药房领取处方。(3)在这些社区中,行动不便的个人和缺乏支持系统的人(如老年人和急性病患者)最关心的是获得药房服务的问题。
{"title":"Causes and consequences of rural pharmacy closures: a multi-case study.","authors":"Kelli Todd,&nbsp;Katie Westfall,&nbsp;Bill Doucette,&nbsp;Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Local rural pharmacies provide essential pharmacy and clinical services to their communities. Pharmacists play a critical role in the continuum of care for rural residents, and the loss of a local pharmacy may impact access to prescription drugs and clinical care. This policy brief identifies factors that contributed to the closing of six pharmacies and describes how the affected communities adapted to losing locally based services. Key Findings. (1) Five out of the six pharmacies studied closed due to retirement and/or difficulties in recruiting a successor. (2) In five of the six communities, residents now either drive to the nearest pharmacy or use mail-order to receive their prescriptions and, in some instances, receive their prescriptions through a courier service from a pharmacy in a nearby town. (3) Access to pharmacy services in these communities is of most concern for individuals with limited mobility and those who lack a support system that can pick up and deliver their prescriptions (e.g., the elderly and people with acute conditions).</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 11","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accountable care organizations in rural America. 负责任的医疗机构在美国农村。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-07-01
A Clinton MacKinney, Thomas Vaughn, Xi Zhu, Keith J Mueller

Key Findings. (1) Medicare Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) operate in non-metropolitan counties in every U.S. Census Region. (2) 79 Medicare ACOs operate in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties. (3) Medicare ACOs operate in 16.7% of non-metropolitan counties. (4) 9 ACOs operate exclusively in non-metropolitan counties, including at least 1 in every U.S. Census Region.

关键的发现。(1)医疗保险责任医疗组织(ACOs)在美国每个人口普查区的非大都市县开展业务。(2) 79家医疗保险ACOs在大都市县和非大都市县均有运营。(3) 16.7%的非大都市县有医疗保险ACOs。(4) 9个aco专门在非大都市县运营,其中每个美国人口普查区至少有1个aco。
{"title":"Accountable care organizations in rural America.","authors":"A Clinton MacKinney,&nbsp;Thomas Vaughn,&nbsp;Xi Zhu,&nbsp;Keith J Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Findings. (1) Medicare Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) operate in non-metropolitan counties in every U.S. Census Region. (2) 79 Medicare ACOs operate in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties. (3) Medicare ACOs operate in 16.7% of non-metropolitan counties. (4) 9 ACOs operate exclusively in non-metropolitan counties, including at least 1 in every U.S. Census Region.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 7","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The uninsured: an analysis by income and geography. 未参保人群:基于收入和地域的分析。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-06-01
Abigail R Barker, Jessica K Londeree, Timothy D McBride, Leah M Kemper, Keith Mueller

Key Findings. (1) A larger proportion of the rural population than the urban population is uninsured and low income (living at or below 138% of the federal poverty line [FPL]) (9.9% as compared to 8.5%) and a larger proportion of the rural population than the urban population will be eligible for subsidized Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) coverage due to income levels and current lack of insurance (10.7% as compared to 9.6%). (2) Assuming full Medicaid expansion, a larger proportion of the rural uninsured than the urban uninsured would be eligible for Medicaid (43.5% as compared to 38.5%). (3) A smaller proportion of the rural uninsured than the urban uninsured has income above 400% FPL and thus will not qualify for either Medicaid or HIM subsidies (10% as compared to 14.1%). (4) The proportion of the uninsured population potentially eligible for Medicaid expansion is highest in the rural South (47.5%) and lowest in the urban Northeast (32.5%) and the rural Northeast (35.8%).

关键的发现。(1)农村人口中没有保险和收入较低(生活在联邦贫困线(FPL)的138%以下)的比例高于城市人口(前者为9.9%,后者为8.5%),由于收入水平和目前缺乏保险,有资格获得医疗保险市场(HIM)补贴的农村人口比例高于城市人口(前者为10.7%,后者为9.6%)。(2)假设医疗补助计划全面扩张,农村未参保人口比例将高于城市未参保人口比例(43.5%比38.5%)。(3)收入超过400% FPL的农村未参保人口比例低于城市未参保人口比例(10%比14.1%),因此无法获得医疗补助或HIM补贴。(4)有资格扩大医疗补助的未参保人口比例在南部农村最高(47.5%),东北城市最低(32.5%),东北农村最低(35.8%)。
{"title":"The uninsured: an analysis by income and geography.","authors":"Abigail R Barker,&nbsp;Jessica K Londeree,&nbsp;Timothy D McBride,&nbsp;Leah M Kemper,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Findings. (1) A larger proportion of the rural population than the urban population is uninsured and low income (living at or below 138% of the federal poverty line [FPL]) (9.9% as compared to 8.5%) and a larger proportion of the rural population than the urban population will be eligible for subsidized Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM) coverage due to income levels and current lack of insurance (10.7% as compared to 9.6%). (2) Assuming full Medicaid expansion, a larger proportion of the rural uninsured than the urban uninsured would be eligible for Medicaid (43.5% as compared to 38.5%). (3) A smaller proportion of the rural uninsured than the urban uninsured has income above 400% FPL and thus will not qualify for either Medicaid or HIM subsidies (10% as compared to 14.1%). (4) The proportion of the uninsured population potentially eligible for Medicaid expansion is highest in the rural South (47.5%) and lowest in the urban Northeast (32.5%) and the rural Northeast (35.8%).</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 6","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural implications of the Primary Care incentive Payment Program. 初级保健激励支付计划对农村的影响。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-06-01
Fred Ullrich, A Clinton MacKinney, Keith Mueller

Key Findings. (1) Both the number and proportion of providers eligible to receive Primary Care Incentive Payments in 2011, 2012, and 2013 increased during the years used to determine eligibility (2009, 2010, and 2011). (2) For most practice types, rural providers were more likely to be eligible for Primary Care Incentive Payments. However, rates of eligibility varied between provider types. (3) Rural Family Practice physicians were less likely to be eligible for Primary Care Incentive Payments than their urban counterparts.

关键的发现。(1)在确定资格的年份(2009年、2010年和2011年)中,2011年、2012年和2013年有资格获得初级保健激励付款的提供者的数量和比例都有所增加。(2)对于大多数实践类型,农村提供者更有可能有资格获得初级保健激励付款。然而,不同提供者类型的合格率各不相同。(3)农村家庭医生比城市家庭医生更不可能有资格获得初级保健激励支付。
{"title":"Rural implications of the Primary Care incentive Payment Program.","authors":"Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;A Clinton MacKinney,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Findings. (1) Both the number and proportion of providers eligible to receive Primary Care Incentive Payments in 2011, 2012, and 2013 increased during the years used to determine eligibility (2009, 2010, and 2011). (2) For most practice types, rural providers were more likely to be eligible for Primary Care Incentive Payments. However, rates of eligibility varied between provider types. (3) Rural Family Practice physicians were less likely to be eligible for Primary Care Incentive Payments than their urban counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 5","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32820445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
June 2012: rural MA enrollment and premium update. 2012年6月:农村MA招生和保费更新。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-02-01
Leah Kemper, Abigail Barker, Timothy D McBride, Keith Mueller

Key Data Findings. (1) Rural Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment grew to over 1.7 million in June 2012 (17% of eligible beneficiaries), while total MA enrollment grew to nearly 13.4 million (27% of eligible beneficiaries). (2) Rural preferred provider organization (PPO) and health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment grew to over 840 thousand (48% of the market) and 532 thousand (31% of the market), respectively, while private fee-for-service (PFFS) enrollment fell to 230 thousand in rural areas (13% of the market). (3) Rural MA enrollment varies across the country with concentrations of enrollment on the West Coast, the Great Lakes, and the Northeast regions of the United States. (4) The average monthly weighted premium for rural MA plans with prescription drugs fell in 2012 to $48 from $52 in 2011, but it remains significantly higher than the urban average which also fell during the same time from $38 to $34. (5) Zero premium plans are available to 73% of rural MA beneficiaries and to 95% of urban beneficiaries; however, only 48% of rural beneficiaries that have this option choose these plans compared to 63% of urban beneficiaries. The resulting average non-zero premium was $72 in rural areas in 2012, while the average non-zero premium in urban areas was $81. (6) Roughly a third (35%) of rural MA beneficiaries receive their MA coverage including prescription drugs without having to pay a premium, however this is significantly lower than 60% of urban beneficiaries that do not have to pay a premium.

关键数据发现。(1) 2012年6月,农村医疗保险优势(MA)注册人数增长到170多万(占合格受益人的17%),而MA总注册人数增长到近1340万(占合格受益人的27%)。(2)农村首选提供者组织(PPO)和健康维护组织(HMO)的注册人数分别增长到84万(市场份额的48%)和53.2万(市场份额的31%),而农村地区私人付费服务(PFFS)的注册人数下降到23万(市场份额的13%)。(3)全国农村MA招生情况各不相同,招生集中在西海岸、五大湖和美国东北部地区。(4)含处方药的农村MA计划的月平均加权保费从2011年的52美元下降到2012年的48美元,但仍显著高于城市平均水平,城市平均保费同期也从38美元下降到34美元。(5) 73%的农村MA受益人和95%的城市MA受益人可享受零保费计划;然而,只有48%的农村受益人选择了这些计划,而城市受益人的这一比例为63%。2012年,农村地区的平均非零保费为72美元,而城市地区的平均非零保费为81美元。(6)大约三分之一(35%)的农村综合医疗保险受益人无需支付保费即可获得包括处方药在内的综合医疗保险,但这一比例明显低于60%的无需支付保费的城市受益人。
{"title":"June 2012: rural MA enrollment and premium update.","authors":"Leah Kemper,&nbsp;Abigail Barker,&nbsp;Timothy D McBride,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Data Findings. (1) Rural Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment grew to over 1.7 million in June 2012 (17% of eligible beneficiaries), while total MA enrollment grew to nearly 13.4 million (27% of eligible beneficiaries). (2) Rural preferred provider organization (PPO) and health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment grew to over 840 thousand (48% of the market) and 532 thousand (31% of the market), respectively, while private fee-for-service (PFFS) enrollment fell to 230 thousand in rural areas (13% of the market). (3) Rural MA enrollment varies across the country with concentrations of enrollment on the West Coast, the Great Lakes, and the Northeast regions of the United States. (4) The average monthly weighted premium for rural MA plans with prescription drugs fell in 2012 to $48 from $52 in 2011, but it remains significantly higher than the urban average which also fell during the same time from $38 to $34. (5) Zero premium plans are available to 73% of rural MA beneficiaries and to 95% of urban beneficiaries; however, only 48% of rural beneficiaries that have this option choose these plans compared to 63% of urban beneficiaries. The resulting average non-zero premium was $72 in rural areas in 2012, while the average non-zero premium in urban areas was $81. (6) Roughly a third (35%) of rural MA beneficiaries receive their MA coverage including prescription drugs without having to pay a premium, however this is significantly lower than 60% of urban beneficiaries that do not have to pay a premium.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2013 2","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32815711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural pharmacy closures: implications for rural communities. 农村药房关闭:对农村社区的影响。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Kelli Todd, Fred Ullrich, Keith Mueller

Retail pharmacies provide essential services to residents of rural areas and serve many communities as the sole provider of pharmacist services. Losing the only retail pharmacy within a rural community (census designated city), and within a 10 mile radius based on driving distance ("sole community pharmacy"), may affect access to prescription and over-the-counter drugs and, in some cases, leave the community without proximate access to any clinical provider. This policy brief documents the closure of local retail pharmacies in which the pharmacist was the only clinical provider available in the community at the time the pharmacy closed. Characteristics of the community and the retail pharmacy are described. The findings may suggest future policy actions to minimize the risk or mitigate the negative consequences of pharmacy closures. Key Findings. (1) Between May 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010, 119 sole community pharmacies closed. (2) Of those 119 pharmacies, 31 were located in rural communities with no other health professionals or clinical providers. (3) In 16 states, at least 1 community lost a sole community retail pharmacy, and there was no other pharmacy within 10 miles (actual driving distance). (4) Of the 31 pharmacy closures in communities with no other providers, 17% were located in remote rural areas designated with a Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) score of 10 or higher. Such a score means that, on average, 60 minutes of travel time is required to reach an urbanized area, and 40 minutes is required to reach a large urban cluster of 20,000 population or more.

零售药店为农村居民提供基本服务,并作为药剂师服务的唯一提供者为许多社区提供服务。失去农村社区(人口普查指定的城市)内唯一的零售药店,并且基于开车距离在10英里半径内(“唯一的社区药房”),可能会影响处方药和非处方药的获取,并且在某些情况下,使社区无法就近获得任何临床提供者。本政策概要记录了当地零售药店的关闭情况,其中药剂师是药店关闭时社区中唯一可用的临床提供者。描述了社区药房和零售药房的特点。研究结果可能建议未来采取政策行动,以尽量减少风险或减轻药房关闭的负面后果。关键的发现。(1) 2006年5月1日至2010年10月31日期间,有119家社区药店关闭。(2)在这119家药房中,31家位于农村社区,没有其他卫生专业人员或临床服务提供者。(3)在16个州中,至少有1个社区失去了唯一的社区零售药店,并且在10英里(实际驾驶距离)内没有其他药店。(4)在31家没有其他提供者的社区关闭的药店中,17%位于城乡通勤区(RUCA)得分为10分或更高的偏远农村地区。这样的分数意味着,到达一个城市化地区平均需要60分钟的旅行时间,到达2万人口以上的大型城市群平均需要40分钟的旅行时间。
{"title":"Rural pharmacy closures: implications for rural communities.","authors":"Kelli Todd,&nbsp;Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retail pharmacies provide essential services to residents of rural areas and serve many communities as the sole provider of pharmacist services. Losing the only retail pharmacy within a rural community (census designated city), and within a 10 mile radius based on driving distance (\"sole community pharmacy\"), may affect access to prescription and over-the-counter drugs and, in some cases, leave the community without proximate access to any clinical provider. This policy brief documents the closure of local retail pharmacies in which the pharmacist was the only clinical provider available in the community at the time the pharmacy closed. Characteristics of the community and the retail pharmacy are described. The findings may suggest future policy actions to minimize the risk or mitigate the negative consequences of pharmacy closures. Key Findings. (1) Between May 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010, 119 sole community pharmacies closed. (2) Of those 119 pharmacies, 31 were located in rural communities with no other health professionals or clinical providers. (3) In 16 states, at least 1 community lost a sole community retail pharmacy, and there was no other pharmacy within 10 miles (actual driving distance). (4) Of the 31 pharmacy closures in communities with no other providers, 17% were located in remote rural areas designated with a Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) score of 10 or higher. Such a score means that, on average, 60 minutes of travel time is required to reach an urbanized area, and 40 minutes is required to reach a large urban cluster of 20,000 population or more.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2012 5","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32817301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Independently owned pharmacy closures in rural America. 美国农村的独立药店倒闭。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2012-07-01
Kaitlin Boyle, Fred Ullrich, Keith Mueller

The closure of rural independently owned pharmacies, including pharmacies that are the sole source of access to local pharmacy services, from 2003 through 2011 coincides with the implementation of two major policies related to payment for prescription medications: (1) Medicare prescription drug discount cards were introduced on January 1, 2004; and (2) the Medicare prescription drug benefit (Part D) began on January 1, 2006. In this brief, we focus on rural pharmacy closure because of the potential threat such closures present to access to any local pharmacy services in a community. Services include providing medications from local stock without delay or travel, overseeing administration of medications to nursing homes and hospitals, and patient consultation.

从2003年到2011年,农村独立药店(包括获得当地药房服务的唯一来源的药店)的关闭,与处方药支付相关的两项主要政策的实施相吻合:(1)2004年1月1日开始实行医疗保险处方药折扣卡;(2)医疗保险处方药福利(D部分)于2006年1月1日开始实施。在本简报中,我们将重点放在农村药房关闭上,因为此类关闭存在对社区中任何当地药房服务的访问的潜在威胁。服务包括不延误或不旅行地从当地库存提供药物,监督向养老院和医院提供药物的管理以及患者咨询。
{"title":"Independently owned pharmacy closures in rural America.","authors":"Kaitlin Boyle,&nbsp;Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The closure of rural independently owned pharmacies, including pharmacies that are the sole source of access to local pharmacy services, from 2003 through 2011 coincides with the implementation of two major policies related to payment for prescription medications: (1) Medicare prescription drug discount cards were introduced on January 1, 2004; and (2) the Medicare prescription drug benefit (Part D) began on January 1, 2006. In this brief, we focus on rural pharmacy closure because of the potential threat such closures present to access to any local pharmacy services in a community. Services include providing medications from local stock without delay or travel, overseeing administration of medications to nursing homes and hospitals, and patient consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2012 4","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30787679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Rural policy brief
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1