Pub Date : 2014-11-29DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.991227
S. Lewis
{"title":"A Note to PEL Readers","authors":"S. Lewis","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.991227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.991227","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"2 1","pages":"3 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82335086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-11-29DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.991232
{"title":"Index & List of Reporters","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.991232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.991232","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"26 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73631949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-27DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.981140
Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981140","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"12 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76054391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-27DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.981139
S. Villavaso
Abstract Stephen Myers was leasing a single‐family residential property in an area zoned A‐1 within the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to four unrelated persons. Per Baton Rouge’s Unified Development Code (UDC) a “family” is defined as “an individual or two (2) or more persons who are related by blood, marriage or legal adoption living together . . . or not more than two (2) persons, or not more than four (4) persons (provided the owner lives on the premises rpar; living together by joint agreement. . . . ” (Myers at 9). In response, the city brought the action seeking to compel Myers to cease his alleged violation of the UDC, and Myers made a reconventional demand alleging the UDC’s definition of family was unconstitutional.
Stephen Myers在路易斯安那州巴吞鲁日市a‐1区租给了四个不相关的人一套独户住宅。根据巴吞鲁日的统一发展法典(UDC)，“家庭”被定义为“通过血缘、婚姻或合法收养生活在一起的个人或两(2)个或更多的人……”或不超过两(2)人，或不超过四(4)人(如果业主住在该处所);通过共同协议住在一起. . . .(Myers at 9)作为回应，市政府采取行动，试图迫使Myers停止他所谓的违反UDC的行为，Myers再次提出要求，称UDC对家庭的定义违宪。
{"title":"Decision to Know: City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Stephen C. Myers","authors":"S. Villavaso","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981139","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stephen Myers was leasing a single‐family residential property in an area zoned A‐1 within the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to four unrelated persons. Per Baton Rouge’s Unified Development Code (UDC) a “family” is defined as “an individual or two (2) or more persons who are related by blood, marriage or legal adoption living together . . . or not more than two (2) persons, or not more than four (4) persons (provided the owner lives on the premises rpar; living together by joint agreement. . . . ” (Myers at 9). In response, the city brought the action seeking to compel Myers to cease his alleged violation of the UDC, and Myers made a reconventional demand alleging the UDC’s definition of family was unconstitutional.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"60 1","pages":"10 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78132072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-27DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.981142
{"title":"Index & List of Reporters","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981142","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"359 7-8","pages":"26 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15480755.2014.981142","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72448527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-27DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.981138
Gregory M. Lipper
Abstract “No holiday season is complete . . . without one or more First Amendment challenges to public holiday displays.” While Santa, Rudolph, and Frosty typically appear at city hall without controversy, government holiday displays that include religious symbols—such as a Christian creche, a Jewish menorah, or a Muslim star and crescent—are more likely to attract legal scrutiny under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For governments that sponsor holiday displays with religious symbols, the resulting litigation can be costly. If the court concludes that the challenged display violates the Constitution, the government must pay the plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees. And even longstanding displays can be challenged—mere tradition is not a defense.
{"title":"First Amendment Limits on Government Holiday Displays","authors":"Gregory M. Lipper","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.981138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.981138","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “No holiday season is complete . . . without one or more First Amendment challenges to public holiday displays.” While Santa, Rudolph, and Frosty typically appear at city hall without controversy, government holiday displays that include religious symbols—such as a Christian creche, a Jewish menorah, or a Muslim star and crescent—are more likely to attract legal scrutiny under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For governments that sponsor holiday displays with religious symbols, the resulting litigation can be costly. If the court concludes that the challenged display violates the Constitution, the government must pay the plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees. And even longstanding displays can be challenged—mere tradition is not a defense.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"110 1","pages":"4 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76445455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-09-24DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.960314
Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.960314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.960314","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"12 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83471959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：