Pub Date : 2014-09-24DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.960316
{"title":"Index & List of Reporters","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.960316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.960316","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"145 1","pages":"26 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78585281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-09-05DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.960311
B. Grumbles
Abstract Believe it or not, an outbreak of bipartisanship and constructive legislating on Capitol Hill actually occurred this past May: Congress successfully passed the bipartisan, $12.3 billion Water Resources Reform and Development Act (WRRDA), which contains important projects, programs, and provisions involving the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
{"title":"Congressional Water Work: Water Resources Reform and Development Act 2014","authors":"B. Grumbles","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.960311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.960311","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Believe it or not, an outbreak of bipartisanship and constructive legislating on Capitol Hill actually occurred this past May: Congress successfully passed the bipartisan, $12.3 billion Water Resources Reform and Development Act (WRRDA), which contains important projects, programs, and provisions involving the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"50 1","pages":"4 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88185590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-09-05DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.960312
Carolyn McAndrews, J. Marcus
Abstract With improved participation requirements and feedback methods, the doors to discussion have opened significantly over the decades to invite participation by those most affected by planning decisions. But the effectiveness of our outreach—and ultimate incorporation of local concerns into our planning—can be limited by the ways in which we define a project or problem and by our own blind spots. In working with an exceptionally organized and engaged community, the authors have identified these missed opportunities and suggest an increased role for planners in ensuring policy makers and decision makers understand local ideas and concerns as not merely opposition, but opportunity.
{"title":"Reducing the Negative Effects of Traffic on Communities: Public Engagement, Planners’ Engagement, and Policy Change","authors":"Carolyn McAndrews, J. Marcus","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.960312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.960312","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With improved participation requirements and feedback methods, the doors to discussion have opened significantly over the decades to invite participation by those most affected by planning decisions. But the effectiveness of our outreach—and ultimate incorporation of local concerns into our planning—can be limited by the ways in which we define a project or problem and by our own blind spots. In working with an exceptionally organized and engaged community, the authors have identified these missed opportunities and suggest an increased role for planners in ensuring policy makers and decision makers understand local ideas and concerns as not merely opposition, but opportunity.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"56 1","pages":"10 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87081994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-09-05DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.960313
B. Connolly
Abstract Based upon its finding that greenhouse gases (GHGs) were air pollutants subject to regulation under Title II of the Clean Air Act, which governs motor vehicle emissions, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that emissions of GHGs from stationary sources of pollution, such as power plants, regulated under Titles I and V of the act, should be subject to similar GHG regulation. Because GHGs are emitted from stationary pollution sources at much higher rates than other air pollutants regulated by the act, and because precise application of the act’s provisions against GHG‐emitting stationary sources would have a profoundly short‐term effect on the U.S. economy and administrative agencies, the EPA created a “Tailoring Rule” to phase in the regulation of GHGs under the act.
{"title":"Decision to Know: Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency","authors":"B. Connolly","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.960313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.960313","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Based upon its finding that greenhouse gases (GHGs) were air pollutants subject to regulation under Title II of the Clean Air Act, which governs motor vehicle emissions, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that emissions of GHGs from stationary sources of pollution, such as power plants, regulated under Titles I and V of the act, should be subject to similar GHG regulation. Because GHGs are emitted from stationary pollution sources at much higher rates than other air pollutants regulated by the act, and because precise application of the act’s provisions against GHG‐emitting stationary sources would have a profoundly short‐term effect on the U.S. economy and administrative agencies, the EPA created a “Tailoring Rule” to phase in the regulation of GHGs under the act.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"69 1","pages":"10 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85527891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-22DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.949107
Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.949107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.949107","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"4 1","pages":"12 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74915460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-22DOI: 10.1080/15480755.2014.949112
{"title":"Index & List of Reporters","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.949112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.949112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"45 1","pages":"25 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2014-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79281385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：