首页 > 最新文献

Problems of Legality最新文献

英文 中文
Legal Strength of Peace Deeds Made by Notary in Efforts to Settle Civil Law Conflict in Indonesia 公证和平契约在解决印尼民事法律冲突中的法律效力
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.283091
Aulia Wibowo, Siti Kunarti, Rahadi Bintoro
The peace that has been made by the disputing parties, in the presence of a notary with a notarial deed, is expected to end the dispute, provide legal certainty between those who are in dispute. The peace deed is also expected to provide legal certainty, benefit and provide justice between those who are in dispute and for their future descendants. Thus it will create a calm life, peace and harmony between those who are at odds. However, if the peace deed that has been made between them, especially what has been made before a notary with a notarized peace deed, can then be disputed again, the problem raised in this study is the legal force of the peace deed made by a notary in an effort to resolve civil law conflicts in Indonesia. In the example case of the Gianyar District Court decision No. 54/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Gir. To answer these problems, normative juridical legal research methods are used with prescriptive research methods. The results of the analysis and research are that the binding power of a notarial peace deed in proof is a deed that has the power of a judge's decision at the final level. The peace deed that was made was also useless and violated the sense of justice of the parties who made it in good faith. Of course this will also cause doubts both among the parties and in society. Therefore, understanding and clarity are needed regarding the nature of the peace itself and the binding power of the notarized peace deed in proof in court. Extensive knowledge so that the word published does not cause problems in the future for the parties involved.
在公证人的见证下,由争议各方达成的和解有望结束争议,为争议各方提供法律确定性。和平契约还有望在有争议的人之间及其未来的后代之间提供法律上的确定性、利益和正义。因此,它将创造一个平静的生活,和平与和谐的人之间的分歧。然而,如果他们之间达成的和平协议,特别是在公证人与公证的和平协议之前达成的和平协议,那么可以再次争议,本研究中提出的问题是公证人为解决印度尼西亚民法冲突而做出的和平协议的法律效力。在Gianyar地区法院第54/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Gir。为了回答这些问题,规范性法律研究方法与规定性研究方法相结合。分析研究的结果表明,证明公证契据的约束力是一种具有终审裁量权的契据。所达成的和平协议也是无用的,违背了真诚达成和平协议各方的正义感。当然,这也会引起党内和社会的怀疑。因此,需要对和解协议本身的性质以及公证后的和解协议在法庭上的证明约束力进行理解和明确。广博的知识,使字出版以后不会给当事人造成问题。
{"title":"Legal Strength of Peace Deeds Made by Notary in Efforts to Settle Civil Law Conflict in Indonesia","authors":"Aulia Wibowo, Siti Kunarti, Rahadi Bintoro","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.283091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.283091","url":null,"abstract":"The peace that has been made by the disputing parties, in the presence of a notary with a notarial deed, is expected to end the dispute, provide legal certainty between those who are in dispute. The peace deed is also expected to provide legal certainty, benefit and provide justice between those who are in dispute and for their future descendants. Thus it will create a calm life, peace and harmony between those who are at odds. However, if the peace deed that has been made between them, especially what has been made before a notary with a notarized peace deed, can then be disputed again, the problem raised in this study is the legal force of the peace deed made by a notary in an effort to resolve civil law conflicts in Indonesia. In the example case of the Gianyar District Court decision No. 54/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Gir. To answer these problems, normative juridical legal research methods are used with prescriptive research methods. The results of the analysis and research are that the binding power of a notarial peace deed in proof is a deed that has the power of a judge's decision at the final level. The peace deed that was made was also useless and violated the sense of justice of the parties who made it in good faith. Of course this will also cause doubts both among the parties and in society. Therefore, understanding and clarity are needed regarding the nature of the peace itself and the binding power of the notarized peace deed in proof in court. Extensive knowledge so that the word published does not cause problems in the future for the parties involved.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Personality in International Migration: the Personological Aspect 国际移民中的法律人格:人格学的视角
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.287143
Oleh Tarasov
The article examines the legal nature and content of legal subjectivity of international migrants using the cutting-edge methodology of international legal personology. The relevance of the research topic is the need to apply the personology methodology to the study of the personal component of the international legal system, especially in the context of Russian aggression which poses a threat to the lives of Ukrainian refugees. The purpose of the article is to determine the legal nature and content of international migration legal personality of a person using the latest methodology of international legal personology. The methodological basis of the study is an interdisciplinary and comprehensive approach which made it possible to formulate the conceptual framework of international migration legal personality of a person with due regard for the modern doctrine and practice of international law. The work uses a number of general theoretical and special scientific methods: objectivity; dialectical; historical and legal; formal and logical; special legal; systemic and structural; comparative legal; sociological; the person-centered method was developed by the author specifically for the study of the problems of the subject of law in general and the subject of international law in particular. It posits that the 1948 mistranslation of the traditional legal concept of “legal personality” (person before the law) as “legal subjectivity” in Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has had negative methodological consequences for domestic studies of personative legal reality. In their research, the scholars typically focused on the legal status, rights and duties of the legal subject rather than legal personality per se. The study of specific qualitative traits of legal personality (such as personative capacity, under the umbrella term of “legal capacity”, or negative capacity, in the narrow framework of criminal capacity) has been fragmentary, sporadic, and categorically vague. Only when legal personology cohered as an academic approach did it became possible to use an adequate person-centric methodology to study the personative element of any legal system. A personological analysis of the traditional concept of “legal capacity” identified three aspects: 1) normative: the capacity of a social actor to bear a legal status, possess rights and duties (normative capacity before the law); 2) personative: the capacity of a social actor to be a subject of law, a legal personality, a bearer of a personative legal form of a physical, legal or sovereign person (personative capacity before the law); 3) communicative: the capacity of a social actor to take part in legal communications, to be a party of legal relations (communicative capacity before the law). Further personological study of international migration law found that a person bears all the features of an international legal personality that possesses the corresponding sectoral personative ca
本文运用国际法律人格学的前沿方法论,考察国际移民法律主体性的法律性质和内容。研究课题的相关性是需要将人格学方法应用于国际法律体系的个人组成部分的研究,特别是在俄罗斯侵略对乌克兰难民的生命构成威胁的背景下。本文旨在运用国际法律人格学的最新方法论,确定国际移民法律人格的法律性质和内容。这项研究的方法论基础是一种跨学科和全面的方法,它使我们能够在适当考虑到现代国际法理论和实践的情况下,制订一个人的国际移徙法律人格的概念框架。本工作采用了若干一般理论和特殊科学方法:客观性;辩证;历史和法律;形式的和逻辑的;特殊的法律;系统性和结构性;比较法律;社会学;以人为本的方法是作者专门为研究一般法律主体问题,特别是国际法主体问题而发展起来的。它认为,1948年《世界人权宣言》第6条将“法律人格”(法律面前的人)这一传统法律概念误译为“法律主体性”,对国内研究人格法律现实产生了消极的方法后果。在他们的研究中,学者们通常关注法律主体的法律地位、权利和义务,而不是法律人格本身。对法律人格的具体定性特征(如在“法律行为能力”的总称下的人称行为能力,或在狭义的刑事行为能力框架下的消极行为能力)的研究一直是零碎的、零星的和绝对模糊的。只有当法律人格学成为一种学术方法时,才有可能使用一种适当的以人为中心的方法来研究任何法律制度的人格要素。对传统“法律行为能力”概念的人格学分析确定了三个方面:1)规范性:社会行为人承担法律地位、拥有权利和义务的能力(法律面前的规范性能力);2)人格:社会行为者成为法律主体、法律人格、自然人、法人或主权人的人格法律形式的持有者的能力(法律面前的人格能力);交际能力:社会行为人参与法律交际,成为法律关系当事人的能力(法律面前的交际能力)。对国际移徙法的进一步人格学研究发现,一个人具有国际法律人格的所有特征,在普遍、区域和特定各级具有相应的部门人格能力和积极能力。与此同时,相当数量的环境(气候)、人为和政治移徙者仍然在普遍一级的国际法律管制范围之外,他们通常被称为相当限制性的“难民”。在区域层面,特别是在双边层面,有一种风险是,在加速重新接纳的过程中,被迫移民普遍承认的权利和基本自由,这强调了对这一相对较新的国际移民法机构进行学术审查的必要性。
{"title":"Legal Personality in International Migration: the Personological Aspect","authors":"Oleh Tarasov","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.287143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.287143","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the legal nature and content of legal subjectivity of international migrants using the cutting-edge methodology of international legal personology. The relevance of the research topic is the need to apply the personology methodology to the study of the personal component of the international legal system, especially in the context of Russian aggression which poses a threat to the lives of Ukrainian refugees. The purpose of the article is to determine the legal nature and content of international migration legal personality of a person using the latest methodology of international legal personology. The methodological basis of the study is an interdisciplinary and comprehensive approach which made it possible to formulate the conceptual framework of international migration legal personality of a person with due regard for the modern doctrine and practice of international law. The work uses a number of general theoretical and special scientific methods: objectivity; dialectical; historical and legal; formal and logical; special legal; systemic and structural; comparative legal; sociological; the person-centered method was developed by the author specifically for the study of the problems of the subject of law in general and the subject of international law in particular. It posits that the 1948 mistranslation of the traditional legal concept of “legal personality” (person before the law) as “legal subjectivity” in Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has had negative methodological consequences for domestic studies of personative legal reality. In their research, the scholars typically focused on the legal status, rights and duties of the legal subject rather than legal personality per se. The study of specific qualitative traits of legal personality (such as personative capacity, under the umbrella term of “legal capacity”, or negative capacity, in the narrow framework of criminal capacity) has been fragmentary, sporadic, and categorically vague. Only when legal personology cohered as an academic approach did it became possible to use an adequate person-centric methodology to study the personative element of any legal system. A personological analysis of the traditional concept of “legal capacity” identified three aspects: 1) normative: the capacity of a social actor to bear a legal status, possess rights and duties (normative capacity before the law); 2) personative: the capacity of a social actor to be a subject of law, a legal personality, a bearer of a personative legal form of a physical, legal or sovereign person (personative capacity before the law); 3) communicative: the capacity of a social actor to take part in legal communications, to be a party of legal relations (communicative capacity before the law). Further personological study of international migration law found that a person bears all the features of an international legal personality that possesses the corresponding sectoral personative ca","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contribution of Hersch Lauterpacht to the Development of International Protection of Human Rights 劳特帕赫特对国际人权保护发展的贡献
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.285449
Vitalii Gutnyk
The article is devoted to Hersch Lauterpacht's contribution to the development of the concept of international protection of human rights and international human rights law in general. The study analyzes relevant norms of international law and scientific works of Hersch Lauterpacht; considerable attention is paid to the reviews of leading scientists on Hersch Lauterpacht's books "An International Bill of the Rights of Man" published in 1945 and "International Law and Human Rights" in 1950. The purpose of the article is to, based on the analysis of Hersch Lauterpacht's scientific works, investigate his contribution to the development of the concept of international protection of human rights. Both general (dialectical and systemic-structural) and special (historical-legal, comparative-legal and formal-dogmatic) scientific methods were used in the research. The article defines the prerequisites for Hersch Lauterpacht's choice of international human rights protection as his scientific interest, explores the peculiarities of the scientific environment within which Hersch Lauterpacht developed the concept of international human rights protection, outlines the main doctrinal approaches to the control mechanism of human rights protection. Particular attention is paid to the progressiveness of Hersch Lauterpacht's concept of international control over the observance of human rights and obstacles to its establishment at the universal level. On the basis of the conducted research, the conclusion was formulated that Hersch Lauterpacht, among a number of scientists of the middle of the 20th century who developed the concepts of international legal regulations of human rights, most thoroughly, after investigating the genesis of the formation of human rights and using natural law approaches, proposed a model of effective international protection of human rights. Hersch Lauterpacht's views on the need for real guarantees of human rights at the universal level, rather than a simple declaration, were quite advanced and far ahead of their time. To a certain extent, they can be perceived as idealistic since even today, the achievement of the same universal international standard of guaranteeing human rights (especially economic, social and cultural) is improbable.
这篇文章专门讨论赫施·劳特帕赫特对国际人权保护概念和一般国际人权法的发展所作的贡献。本研究分析了国际法的相关规范和赫施·劳特帕赫特的科学著作;著名科学家对赫希·劳特帕赫特1945年出版的《国际人权法案》和1950年出版的《国际法与人权》的评论受到了相当大的关注。本文的目的是在分析赫施·劳特帕赫特的科学著作的基础上,探讨他对国际人权保护概念发展的贡献。一般科学方法(辩证法和系统结构法)和特殊科学方法(历史法、比较法和形式教条法)在研究中都有运用。本文界定了赫施·劳特帕赫特选择国际人权保护作为其科学兴趣的先决条件,探讨了赫施·劳特帕赫特发展国际人权保护概念的科学环境的特殊性,概述了人权保护控制机制的主要理论途径。委员会特别注意到赫施·劳特帕赫特关于对人权的遵守进行国际管制的概念的先进性以及在普遍一级建立这种管制的障碍。在研究的基础上,得出的结论是,Hersch Lauterpacht是20世纪中叶发展人权国际法律规制概念最彻底的一批科学家之一,他在考察了人权形成的起源并运用自然法方法后,提出了一种有效的国际人权保护模式。赫尔施·劳特帕赫特关于需要在普遍一级真正保障人权,而不是一项简单的宣言的观点是相当先进的,远远领先于他们的时代。在某种程度上,它们可以被认为是理想主义的,因为即使在今天,实现同样的保障人权(特别是经济、社会和文化)的普遍国际标准是不可能的。
{"title":"Contribution of Hersch Lauterpacht to the Development of International Protection of Human Rights","authors":"Vitalii Gutnyk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.285449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.285449","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to Hersch Lauterpacht's contribution to the development of the concept of international protection of human rights and international human rights law in general. The study analyzes relevant norms of international law and scientific works of Hersch Lauterpacht; considerable attention is paid to the reviews of leading scientists on Hersch Lauterpacht's books \"An International Bill of the Rights of Man\" published in 1945 and \"International Law and Human Rights\" in 1950. The purpose of the article is to, based on the analysis of Hersch Lauterpacht's scientific works, investigate his contribution to the development of the concept of international protection of human rights. Both general (dialectical and systemic-structural) and special (historical-legal, comparative-legal and formal-dogmatic) scientific methods were used in the research. The article defines the prerequisites for Hersch Lauterpacht's choice of international human rights protection as his scientific interest, explores the peculiarities of the scientific environment within which Hersch Lauterpacht developed the concept of international human rights protection, outlines the main doctrinal approaches to the control mechanism of human rights protection. Particular attention is paid to the progressiveness of Hersch Lauterpacht's concept of international control over the observance of human rights and obstacles to its establishment at the universal level. On the basis of the conducted research, the conclusion was formulated that Hersch Lauterpacht, among a number of scientists of the middle of the 20th century who developed the concepts of international legal regulations of human rights, most thoroughly, after investigating the genesis of the formation of human rights and using natural law approaches, proposed a model of effective international protection of human rights. Hersch Lauterpacht's views on the need for real guarantees of human rights at the universal level, rather than a simple declaration, were quite advanced and far ahead of their time. To a certain extent, they can be perceived as idealistic since even today, the achievement of the same universal international standard of guaranteeing human rights (especially economic, social and cultural) is improbable.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135295740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Local Working of Patents: a Comparative Study of Europe and Indonesia 专利的地方运作:欧洲与印尼的比较研究
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.285119
Ika Dewi, Harits Nu’man, Neni Ruhaeni, Dini Heniarti
This study analyzes the implementation mechanism of local working patents from both European and Indonesian perspectives, using normative research methods and secondary data obtained from library research. The implementation of Patent Act Number 13 of 2016 has faced criticism from various parties, including patent holders who find it complicated and difficult to comply with the local working patent provisions. The Ministry of Law and Human Rights has issued regulations to facilitate patent holders who are unable to implement Article 20 by allowing them to request patent postponement. However, the Job Creation Act No. 11 of 2022 has made it easier for patent holders to fulfill their obligations regarding local working patents. The Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) is responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and reporting on intellectual property protection. However, rules and procedures related to monitoring mechanisms, especially those related to implementing local working patents, have not been fully regulated by the DGIP Office.
本研究采用规范的研究方法和从图书馆研究中获得的二手数据,从欧洲和印度尼西亚的角度分析了地方有效专利的实施机制。2016年第13号专利法的实施受到了各方的批评,其中包括专利持有人,他们认为遵守当地有效的专利规定非常复杂和困难。法律人权部为方便不能履行《专利法》第20条的专利权人,制定了允许他们申请专利延期的规定。但是,随着2022年第11号《创造就业机会法》的实施,专利持有人更容易履行有关当地有效专利的义务。知识产权总局(DGIP)负责监测、评估和报告知识产权保护情况。但是,与监测机制有关的规则和程序,特别是与实施地方有效专利有关的规则和程序,还没有得到知识产权局的充分规范。
{"title":"Local Working of Patents: a Comparative Study of Europe and Indonesia","authors":"Ika Dewi, Harits Nu’man, Neni Ruhaeni, Dini Heniarti","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.285119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.285119","url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the implementation mechanism of local working patents from both European and Indonesian perspectives, using normative research methods and secondary data obtained from library research. The implementation of Patent Act Number 13 of 2016 has faced criticism from various parties, including patent holders who find it complicated and difficult to comply with the local working patent provisions. The Ministry of Law and Human Rights has issued regulations to facilitate patent holders who are unable to implement Article 20 by allowing them to request patent postponement. However, the Job Creation Act No. 11 of 2022 has made it easier for patent holders to fulfill their obligations regarding local working patents. The Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) is responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and reporting on intellectual property protection. However, rules and procedures related to monitoring mechanisms, especially those related to implementing local working patents, have not been fully regulated by the DGIP Office.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electronic Technologies in Elections and Referendums: Theory and Practice 电子技术在选举和公民投票:理论与实践
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.286065
Kateryna Pavshuk
The article is devoted to the study of the theory and practice of using electronic technologies in elections and referendums in the context of guaranteeing the established international principles of electoral law. The relevance of the topic is related to the adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On the All-Ukrainian Referendum", which allows the use of information and telecommunication technologies during its organization and conduct. The subject of the study is the theory and practice of using electronic technologies in elections and referendums in Ukraine and abroad. The purpose of the article is to analyze the use of electronic technologies in the process of administration, preparation and conduct of elections, which can be similarly used in the all-Ukrainian referendum in the context of ensuring the principles of electoral law, and also to clarify the technical side of their implementation. The study applies the method of analysis and synthesis of scientific information, comparative legal and dialectical methods of scientific cognition. The norms of domestic legislation on holding elections and the all-Ukrainian referendum on the use of electronic technologies have been studied. International standards of the implementation of e-voting technology, as well as the main recommendations of the Venice Commission and the Committee of Ministers on preventing violations of the principle of fair and free elections during the use of information technologies, were analyzed. Special attention was paid to the study of legal opinions of courts of foreign countries regarding problematic aspects and possible violation of voting principles when using e-voting technology (USA, Germany, India, Albania). It was concluded that the international community does not distinguish between using of electronic voting programs in elections and referendums, applying the same approaches to the implementation of electoral principles. Recommendations for domestic legislative activity and the practice of election administration are outlined. The possible use of such leading information and telecommunication technologies as biometric identification, online registration of political parties and candidates, electronic voting, optical scanning of paper ballots, recording of a paper trail, cryptography, etc. has been revealed. The analysis of judicial practice made it possible to conclude that in order to comply with the public nature of the election process it is important to guarantee cybersecurity, protection of personal data and the results of will detection by recording a paper trail. Finally, attention was drawn to the problem of legislative regulation of electronic procedures during the all-Ukrainian referendum without their consistency and harmonization with the provisions of the Election Code of Ukraine. The obsolescence of the procedure for initiating a national referendum enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and detailed in the law, which needs to be modernized, is emphas
这篇文章专门研究在保证既定的国际选举法原则的范围内,在选举和公民投票中使用电子技术的理论和实践。本专题的相关性与乌克兰通过了《关于全民公决》的法律有关,该法律允许在组织和进行全民公决期间使用信息和电信技术。该研究的主题是在乌克兰和国外的选举和公民投票中使用电子技术的理论和实践。这篇文章的目的是分析电子技术在选举的管理、筹备和进行过程中的使用,在确保选举法原则的范围内,电子技术同样可以用于全乌克兰公民投票,并澄清其执行的技术方面。本研究运用了科学信息分析综合的方法、比较法学的方法和科学认知的辩证方法。已经研究了关于举行选举的国内立法规范和关于使用电子技术的全乌克兰公民投票。分析了实施电子投票技术的国际标准,以及威尼斯委员会和部长委员会关于在使用信息技术期间防止违反公平和自由选举原则的主要建议。特别注意研究外国法院在使用电子投票技术时关于有问题的方面和可能违反投票原则的法律意见(美国、德国、印度、阿尔巴尼亚)。结论是,国际社会不区分在选举中使用电子投票方案和在公民投票中使用电子投票方案,对执行选举原则采用同样的方法。概述了对国内立法活动和选举管理实践的建议。生物识别、政党和候选人在线登记、电子投票、纸质选票的光学扫描、记录纸质记录、密码等尖端信息通信技术的应用前景已经被揭露。通过对司法实践的分析,可以得出这样的结论:为了遵守选举过程的公共性,必须保证网络安全,保护个人数据,并通过记录书面记录来检测意志的结果。最后,有人提请注意在全乌克兰全民投票期间对电子程序进行立法管制的问题,这些程序不符合乌克兰《选举法》的规定。他强调指出,乌克兰宪法所载并详列于法律中的发起全国公民投票的程序已经过时,需要使之现代化。
{"title":"Electronic Technologies in Elections and Referendums: Theory and Practice","authors":"Kateryna Pavshuk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.286065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.286065","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the theory and practice of using electronic technologies in elections and referendums in the context of guaranteeing the established international principles of electoral law. The relevance of the topic is related to the adoption of the Law of Ukraine \"On the All-Ukrainian Referendum\", which allows the use of information and telecommunication technologies during its organization and conduct. The subject of the study is the theory and practice of using electronic technologies in elections and referendums in Ukraine and abroad. The purpose of the article is to analyze the use of electronic technologies in the process of administration, preparation and conduct of elections, which can be similarly used in the all-Ukrainian referendum in the context of ensuring the principles of electoral law, and also to clarify the technical side of their implementation. The study applies the method of analysis and synthesis of scientific information, comparative legal and dialectical methods of scientific cognition. The norms of domestic legislation on holding elections and the all-Ukrainian referendum on the use of electronic technologies have been studied. International standards of the implementation of e-voting technology, as well as the main recommendations of the Venice Commission and the Committee of Ministers on preventing violations of the principle of fair and free elections during the use of information technologies, were analyzed. Special attention was paid to the study of legal opinions of courts of foreign countries regarding problematic aspects and possible violation of voting principles when using e-voting technology (USA, Germany, India, Albania). It was concluded that the international community does not distinguish between using of electronic voting programs in elections and referendums, applying the same approaches to the implementation of electoral principles. Recommendations for domestic legislative activity and the practice of election administration are outlined. The possible use of such leading information and telecommunication technologies as biometric identification, online registration of political parties and candidates, electronic voting, optical scanning of paper ballots, recording of a paper trail, cryptography, etc. has been revealed. The analysis of judicial practice made it possible to conclude that in order to comply with the public nature of the election process it is important to guarantee cybersecurity, protection of personal data and the results of will detection by recording a paper trail. Finally, attention was drawn to the problem of legislative regulation of electronic procedures during the all-Ukrainian referendum without their consistency and harmonization with the provisions of the Election Code of Ukraine. The obsolescence of the procedure for initiating a national referendum enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and detailed in the law, which needs to be modernized, is emphas","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Procedural Obstacles in Cases of Appealing Decisions, Actions, Inaction of the National Agency for on Corruption Prevention 国家预防腐败机构的上诉决定、行动和不作为案件中的程序障碍
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.284307
Yana Zelinska, Viktoriia Spasenko
The relevance of the article lies in the fact that fair and correct resolution of administrative cases involving appeals against decisions, actions and omissions of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption is possible only if all the principles of administrative justice are observed. Good faith in the exercise of procedural rights and strict observance of obligations by all participants to administrative proceedings is defined as one of the principles of administrative justice, and its observance plays a key role in achieving the objective of administrative justice. The purpose of the article is to analyze procedural obstacles, in particular, abuse of procedural rights, in the course of consideration of cases involving appeals against decisions, actions and inactions of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. The study applies dialectical, formal legal, comparative legal, logical and semantic, statistical methods of scientific knowledge, as well as methods of observation, forecasting, classification and grouping, and prediction. The author examines certain aspects of the organization and activities of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. It is proved that the most common administrative cases involving appeals against decisions, actions or omissions of the NAPC are the recognition as unlawful and the reversal of the decision of this public administration entity on the results of a full verification of the declaration of a person authorized to perform the functions of the State or local self-government. It is emphasized that procedural obstacles may arise during consideration of cases involving appeals against decisions, actions, and inactions of a public authority. The author examines such a procedural obstacle as abuse of procedural rights. The author analyzes the dual aspect of abuse of procedural rights, in particular, the substantive and procedural aspects. The author establishes that abuse of procedural rights which have a substantive legal aspect may arise when applying to an administrative court. It is noted that the procedural and legal aspect is related to the abuse of procedural rights at various procedural stages of administrative proceedings to appeal against decisions, actions and inactions of the NAPC, in particular: 1) opening of proceedings; 2) preparatory proceedings; 3) consideration of the case on the merits; 4) adoption and adoption of a court decision. The author provides the stages at which abuse of procedural rights may occur, given that the case is considered in the form of general action proceedings by the court of first instance. Based on the study, the author formulates conclusions and provides recommendations that abuse of procedural rights as a procedural obstacle in administrative cases concerning appeals against decisions, actions, and inactions of the NAPC may have a dual purpose: to create procedural obstacles and to delay the consideration of a case. The application of pr
该条的相关性在于,只有在遵守所有行政司法原则的情况下,才有可能公正和正确地解决涉及对国家防止腐败署的决定、行动和不作为提出上诉的行政案件。诚信行使程序性权利和严格履行行政诉讼参与人的义务是行政司法的原则之一,遵守这一原则对实现行政司法目标起着关键作用。该条的目的是分析在审议涉及对国家防止腐败机构的决定、行动和不作为提出上诉的案件过程中的程序性障碍,特别是程序性权利的滥用。运用科学知识的辩证方法、形式法学方法、比较法学方法、逻辑语义学方法、统计学方法,以及观察法、预测法、分类分组法、预测法。作者审查了国家防止腐败机构的组织和活动的某些方面。事实证明,最常见的行政案件涉及对国家行政委员会的决定、行动或不作为提出上诉,即承认该公共行政实体的决定是非法的,并在对被授权履行国家或地方自治政府职能的人的声明进行全面核查的结果上撤销该决定。它强调,在审议涉及对公共当局的决定、行动和不作为提出上诉的案件时,可能会出现程序障碍。笔者对程序性权利滥用这一程序性障碍进行了探讨。笔者分析了程序权利滥用的两个方面,即实体和程序两个方面。作者认为,在向行政法院提出申请时,可能会出现具有实体法方面的程序性权利的滥用。值得注意的是,程序和法律方面涉及在行政诉讼的各个程序阶段滥用程序权利,对国家行政委员会的决定、行动和不作为提出上诉,特别是:1)启动程序;(二)准备程序;(三)根据案情审理案件;(四)收养和接受法院判决。鉴于案件是由初审法院以一般诉讼程序的形式审议,发件人提供了可能发生滥用程序权利的阶段。在研究的基础上,作者得出结论并提出建议,认为滥用程序性权利作为对国家行政委员会的决定、行动和不作为提出上诉的行政案件中的程序性障碍可能具有双重目的:制造程序性障碍和拖延对案件的审议。法院对程序后果的适用取决于在诉讼的某一特定阶段所犯的滥用程序权利的类型。
{"title":"Procedural Obstacles in Cases of Appealing Decisions, Actions, Inaction of the National Agency for on Corruption Prevention","authors":"Yana Zelinska, Viktoriia Spasenko","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.284307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.284307","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the article lies in the fact that fair and correct resolution of administrative cases involving appeals against decisions, actions and omissions of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption is possible only if all the principles of administrative justice are observed. Good faith in the exercise of procedural rights and strict observance of obligations by all participants to administrative proceedings is defined as one of the principles of administrative justice, and its observance plays a key role in achieving the objective of administrative justice. The purpose of the article is to analyze procedural obstacles, in particular, abuse of procedural rights, in the course of consideration of cases involving appeals against decisions, actions and inactions of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. The study applies dialectical, formal legal, comparative legal, logical and semantic, statistical methods of scientific knowledge, as well as methods of observation, forecasting, classification and grouping, and prediction. The author examines certain aspects of the organization and activities of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. It is proved that the most common administrative cases involving appeals against decisions, actions or omissions of the NAPC are the recognition as unlawful and the reversal of the decision of this public administration entity on the results of a full verification of the declaration of a person authorized to perform the functions of the State or local self-government. It is emphasized that procedural obstacles may arise during consideration of cases involving appeals against decisions, actions, and inactions of a public authority. The author examines such a procedural obstacle as abuse of procedural rights. The author analyzes the dual aspect of abuse of procedural rights, in particular, the substantive and procedural aspects. The author establishes that abuse of procedural rights which have a substantive legal aspect may arise when applying to an administrative court. It is noted that the procedural and legal aspect is related to the abuse of procedural rights at various procedural stages of administrative proceedings to appeal against decisions, actions and inactions of the NAPC, in particular: 1) opening of proceedings; 2) preparatory proceedings; 3) consideration of the case on the merits; 4) adoption and adoption of a court decision. The author provides the stages at which abuse of procedural rights may occur, given that the case is considered in the form of general action proceedings by the court of first instance. Based on the study, the author formulates conclusions and provides recommendations that abuse of procedural rights as a procedural obstacle in administrative cases concerning appeals against decisions, actions, and inactions of the NAPC may have a dual purpose: to create procedural obstacles and to delay the consideration of a case. The application of pr","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constitutive Features of Administrative Acts: Criticism and Analysis 行政行为的构成特征:批判与分析
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.286411
Roman Melnyk
The relevance of the topic has been determined by the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». The article is aimed at analyzing the approaches on understanding the features of an administrative act existing in Ukrainian legal doctrine and formulating recommendations oriented on building their universal system. Various methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural, analysis, synthesis, and others constitute the research methodology. It makes it possible to systematically and consistently solve scientific problems, to study and compare the standpoints of scholars, the provisions of legal acts of the relevant countries, caselaw and to formulate the author’s conclusions. A number of systematic problems related to the incorrect understanding of the essence and features of administrative acts has been revealed in the research process. This situation, according to the author’s opinion, is largely related to the imperfection of legal definition of an administrative act, which was enshrined in the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». Further analysis of the works of Ukrainian authors has demonstrated that in order to formulate relevant scientific provisions they in the vast majority use the results of Soviet authors. According to the author, such an approach is wrong; it blocks the development of modern, practically oriented concepts and conclusions. The author of the article has separately emphasized the fact that the features of an administrative act perform very important practical function. They help to solve comprehensive objectives primarily arising at the legal enforcement level. The author provides relevant detailed explanations on this matter. The article’s center of attention is the detailed presentation of the features of an administrative act. While performing this objective, the author has widely used the achievements of Western European authors, as well as refers to certain decisions of the judicial power to demonstrate the validity of the formulated conclusions and recommendations. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to a sound conclusion that an administrative act should be characterized by the following features: 1) it represents a decision; 2) it is taken by an administrative agency; 3) it is oriented on the application / implementation of the norms of public (administrative) law; 4) it causes legal consequences in the form of establishing the rights or obligations for its addressee (regulatory nature); 5) it has a concrete and individual character; 6) it is characterized by an external orientation of the action. The conducted research allowed to draw the following conclusion:the features of an administrative act play a constitutive role by helping to solve various theoretical and practical problems. The features of an administrative act are universal in nature. It means that they do not depend (should not depend) on the national pecu
《乌克兰行政程序法》的生效确定了本专题的相关性。本文旨在分析乌克兰法律学说中存在的理解行政行为特征的方法,并针对建立其普遍制度提出建议。科学认知的各种方法,包括比较与法律、系统与结构、分析、综合等,构成了研究方法论。它可以系统地、连贯地解决科学问题,研究和比较学者的观点、有关国家法律行为的规定、判例法,并形成作者的结论。在研究过程中,暴露出对行政行为的本质和特征认识不正确的一系列制度问题。提交人认为,这种情况在很大程度上与乌克兰《行政程序法》所规定的行政行为的法律定义不完善有关。对乌克兰作者作品的进一步分析表明,为了制定有关的科学规定,他们绝大多数都使用了苏联作者的成果。在作者看来,这种做法是错误的;它阻碍了现代的、面向实践的概念和结论的发展。本文作者分别强调了行政行为的特征具有非常重要的实践功能。它们有助于解决主要在执法层面产生的综合目标。作者对这一问题进行了相关的详细说明。本文的重点是详细介绍行政行为的特征。在实现这一目标的同时,作者广泛引用了西欧作者的成就,并引用了司法权的某些决定来证明所制定的结论和建议的有效性。通过对行政行为的研究,笔者得出了行政行为应当具有以下特征的结论:1)行政行为是一种决定;(二)行政机关采取的;3)以公共(行政)法规范的适用/实施为导向;4)以确立收件人权利或义务的形式造成法律后果(监管性质);(5)具体的、个别的;6)它的特点是动作的外部定向。通过研究可以得出以下结论:行政行为的特征通过帮助解决各种理论和实践问题来发挥构成作用。行政行为的特征具有普遍性。这意味着它们不依赖于(不应该依赖于)各国法律规定的特殊性和有关法律规定的观念。乌克兰作者在就这些具有超国家性质的类别和规定作出自己的结论时必须极为负责。
{"title":"Constitutive Features of Administrative Acts: Criticism and Analysis","authors":"Roman Melnyk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.286411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.286411","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the topic has been determined by the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». The article is aimed at analyzing the approaches on understanding the features of an administrative act existing in Ukrainian legal doctrine and formulating recommendations oriented on building their universal system. Various methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural, analysis, synthesis, and others constitute the research methodology. It makes it possible to systematically and consistently solve scientific problems, to study and compare the standpoints of scholars, the provisions of legal acts of the relevant countries, caselaw and to formulate the author’s conclusions. A number of systematic problems related to the incorrect understanding of the essence and features of administrative acts has been revealed in the research process. This situation, according to the author’s opinion, is largely related to the imperfection of legal definition of an administrative act, which was enshrined in the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». Further analysis of the works of Ukrainian authors has demonstrated that in order to formulate relevant scientific provisions they in the vast majority use the results of Soviet authors. According to the author, such an approach is wrong; it blocks the development of modern, practically oriented concepts and conclusions. The author of the article has separately emphasized the fact that the features of an administrative act perform very important practical function. They help to solve comprehensive objectives primarily arising at the legal enforcement level. The author provides relevant detailed explanations on this matter. The article’s center of attention is the detailed presentation of the features of an administrative act. While performing this objective, the author has widely used the achievements of Western European authors, as well as refers to certain decisions of the judicial power to demonstrate the validity of the formulated conclusions and recommendations. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to a sound conclusion that an administrative act should be characterized by the following features: 1) it represents a decision; 2) it is taken by an administrative agency; 3) it is oriented on the application / implementation of the norms of public (administrative) law; 4) it causes legal consequences in the form of establishing the rights or obligations for its addressee (regulatory nature); 5) it has a concrete and individual character; 6) it is characterized by an external orientation of the action. The conducted research allowed to draw the following conclusion:the features of an administrative act play a constitutive role by helping to solve various theoretical and practical problems. The features of an administrative act are universal in nature. It means that they do not depend (should not depend) on the national pecu","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strengthening the Institutional Independence of the Court in the System of European Integration Steps of Ukraine 加强乌克兰欧洲一体化步骤体系中法院的机构独立性
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.284111
Lidiia Moskvych
The article is devoted to the study of European standards of judicial independence. The subject of the study is the institution of court independence and specific measures to improve its legal support in Ukraine in accordance with European standards. The purpose of the article is to determine the following judicial reform measures aimed at institutional and legal harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with the standards of the European Union. The research uses dialectical, systematic analysis and synthesis, comparison and legal modeling methods of scientific knowledge. Acquiring the status of a candidate country in the EU obliges Ukraine to carry out a number of transformations of social and political institutions, and judicial reform is one of them. This will require systemic measures, and not just amendments to legislation aimed at harmonizing national legal norms with European standards. It is emphasized that despite the ongoing judicial reform, the goal of an effective court has not been achieved: the level of public trust in the court is still low. The author predicts that if only point changes in judicial legislation are started now, the result will be the same as during the previous steps of judicial reform. It is necessary to start with the construction of the foundation for an effective judicial system, which is the independence of the court. Analyzing the European standards of an independent court and the practices of the EU institutions regarding the assessment of the impact of various indicators on the general assessment of the assurance of court independence, taking into account the current and urgent problems of the judicial system of Ukraine, the author makes a number of proposals for improving domestic legislation and practice aimed at strengthening the independence of the court, which the author calls fundamental the value of a democratic state, a prerequisite for an effective judicial protection system.
本文致力于对欧洲司法独立标准的研究。该研究的主题是法院独立的制度以及根据欧洲标准改善其在乌克兰的法律支持的具体措施。该条的目的是确定下列司法改革措施,旨在使乌克兰立法在体制和法律上与欧洲联盟的标准相协调。本研究采用科学知识的辨证法、系统分析综合法、比较法和法律建模法。乌克兰要获得欧盟候选国的地位,就必须对社会和政治机构进行一系列改革,司法改革就是其中之一。这将需要系统性的措施,而不仅仅是修改旨在使国家法律规范与欧洲标准协调一致的立法。有人强调,尽管正在进行司法改革,但建立有效法院的目标尚未实现:公众对法院的信任程度仍然很低。笔者预测,如果现在仅仅在司法立法上进行点的变革,其结果将与以往司法改革的结果相同。必须从构建有效司法制度的基础开始,即法院的独立性。作者分析了独立法院的欧洲标准和欧盟机构在评估各种指标对保证法院独立性的一般评估的影响方面的做法,并考虑到乌克兰司法系统当前和紧迫的问题,提出了一些旨在加强法院独立性的改进国内立法和实践的建议。这是民主国家的根本价值,是有效的司法保护制度的前提。
{"title":"Strengthening the Institutional Independence of the Court in the System of European Integration Steps of Ukraine","authors":"Lidiia Moskvych","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.284111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.284111","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of European standards of judicial independence. The subject of the study is the institution of court independence and specific measures to improve its legal support in Ukraine in accordance with European standards. The purpose of the article is to determine the following judicial reform measures aimed at institutional and legal harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with the standards of the European Union. The research uses dialectical, systematic analysis and synthesis, comparison and legal modeling methods of scientific knowledge. Acquiring the status of a candidate country in the EU obliges Ukraine to carry out a number of transformations of social and political institutions, and judicial reform is one of them. This will require systemic measures, and not just amendments to legislation aimed at harmonizing national legal norms with European standards. It is emphasized that despite the ongoing judicial reform, the goal of an effective court has not been achieved: the level of public trust in the court is still low. The author predicts that if only point changes in judicial legislation are started now, the result will be the same as during the previous steps of judicial reform. It is necessary to start with the construction of the foundation for an effective judicial system, which is the independence of the court. Analyzing the European standards of an independent court and the practices of the EU institutions regarding the assessment of the impact of various indicators on the general assessment of the assurance of court independence, taking into account the current and urgent problems of the judicial system of Ukraine, the author makes a number of proposals for improving domestic legislation and practice aimed at strengthening the independence of the court, which the author calls fundamental the value of a democratic state, a prerequisite for an effective judicial protection system.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Problems of Normative Regulation of Investigative (Search) Actions Aimed at Verifying and Specifying Information Obtained During the Pre-Judicial Investigation 对法前侦查中获取的信息进行核实和说明的侦查(检索)行为的规范规制问题
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.285224
Oksana Kaplina, Halyna Hetman
The article raises questions related to the definition of the system of investigative (search) actions relevant to modern law enforcement practice and the doctrine of the criminal procedure. Namely, for a long time the 1960 CPC in art. 194 provided for an investigative action such as reconstructing situation and circumstances of a certain event. The lack of legal certainty of this article logically led to a discussion about its legal content, which led scholars to form an opinion regarding the coverage of its normative content by two independent investigative actions – an investigative experiment and verification of testimony on the site. However, such a conclusion was only a doctrinal approach. The legal content of art. 194 of the 1960 CPC of Ukraine remained not clearly defined, which led to a lack of unity in approaches to its understanding until the very adoption in 2012 of the new CPC of Ukraine. Such a defect in the norm of criminal procedural law did not meet the requirements of the rule-making technique, and even less the needs of law enforcement practice. With the adoption of the 2012 CPC and enshrined in art. 240 as a separate investigative (search) activity of an investigative experiment, the discussion regarding the necessity of adopting an additional investigative activity such as verification of testimony on the site has appeared. The aim of the article is to interpret the Art. 240 of the 2012 Criminal Procedure Code to understand its legal content for clarifying the essence of such an investigative action as an "investigative experiment", to establish the types of experimental actions, to distinguish them from similar investigative actions, to resolve the issue of the feasibility of enshrining in the current Criminal Procedure Code such an investigative action as checking testimony on the scene. In this article, the authors express an opinion about the inexpediency of transferring this Soviet-era debate, which has been going for almost 50 years, to the modern times. The author's position is determined by the conceptual provisions laid down in the 2012 CPC, the essence of which is that testimony is information provided during an interrogation. The CPC of 2012 contains a procedural mechanism by which an investigator, inquirer, and prosecutor can verify previously submitted statements. Such proper legal procedure is an interrogation, which, in accordance with the requirements of the CPC, can be conducted both at the place of the pre-trial investigation and at another place, which determines the inexpediency of unnecessary legislative duplication.
本文提出了与现代执法实践和刑事诉讼理论相关的侦查(搜查)行为制度的定义问题。也就是在很长一段时间里,1960年代的中国共产党在艺术上。第194条规定了诸如重建某一事件的情况和环境等调查行动。由于这篇文章缺乏法律确定性,在逻辑上引发了对其法律内容的讨论,从而导致学者们对其规范性内容的覆盖形成了一种观点,即通过两种独立的调查行动——调查实验和现场证词核实。然而,这样的结论只是一种理论方法。艺术的法律内容。1960年乌克兰共产党第194号党纲仍然没有明确界定,这导致对其理解的方法缺乏统一,直到2012年通过了新的乌克兰共产党。刑事诉讼法规范的这种缺陷既不符合规则制定技术的要求,更不符合执法实践的需要。随着2012年中国共产党的通过,并被载入艺术。作为调查实验的一项单独的调查(搜索)活动,出现了关于是否需要采取诸如现场证词验证等额外调查活动的讨论。本文旨在通过对2012年《刑事诉讼法》第240条的解读,理解其法律内容,明确此类侦查行为作为“侦查实验”的本质,确立实验行为的类型,区分实验行为与同类侦查行为,解决现行《刑事诉讼法》将现场核查证言等侦查行为纳入法条的可行性问题。在这篇文章中,作者表达了一种观点,即把这种已经进行了近50年的苏联时代的辩论转移到现代是不合适的。作者的立场是由2012年中国共产党的概念性规定决定的,其实质是证词是在审讯过程中提供的信息。2012年的CPC包含一个程序机制,通过该机制,调查人员、询问者和检察官可以核实先前提交的陈述。这种正当的法律程序是一种讯问,按照刑事检控委员会的要求,讯问既可以在预审侦查地进行,也可以在另一处进行,这就决定了不必要的立法重复是不合适的。
{"title":"Problems of Normative Regulation of Investigative (Search) Actions Aimed at Verifying and Specifying Information Obtained During the Pre-Judicial Investigation","authors":"Oksana Kaplina, Halyna Hetman","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.285224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.285224","url":null,"abstract":"The article raises questions related to the definition of the system of investigative (search) actions relevant to modern law enforcement practice and the doctrine of the criminal procedure. Namely, for a long time the 1960 CPC in art. 194 provided for an investigative action such as reconstructing situation and circumstances of a certain event. The lack of legal certainty of this article logically led to a discussion about its legal content, which led scholars to form an opinion regarding the coverage of its normative content by two independent investigative actions – an investigative experiment and verification of testimony on the site. However, such a conclusion was only a doctrinal approach. The legal content of art. 194 of the 1960 CPC of Ukraine remained not clearly defined, which led to a lack of unity in approaches to its understanding until the very adoption in 2012 of the new CPC of Ukraine. Such a defect in the norm of criminal procedural law did not meet the requirements of the rule-making technique, and even less the needs of law enforcement practice. With the adoption of the 2012 CPC and enshrined in art. 240 as a separate investigative (search) activity of an investigative experiment, the discussion regarding the necessity of adopting an additional investigative activity such as verification of testimony on the site has appeared. The aim of the article is to interpret the Art. 240 of the 2012 Criminal Procedure Code to understand its legal content for clarifying the essence of such an investigative action as an \"investigative experiment\", to establish the types of experimental actions, to distinguish them from similar investigative actions, to resolve the issue of the feasibility of enshrining in the current Criminal Procedure Code such an investigative action as checking testimony on the scene. In this article, the authors express an opinion about the inexpediency of transferring this Soviet-era debate, which has been going for almost 50 years, to the modern times. The author's position is determined by the conceptual provisions laid down in the 2012 CPC, the essence of which is that testimony is information provided during an interrogation. The CPC of 2012 contains a procedural mechanism by which an investigator, inquirer, and prosecutor can verify previously submitted statements. Such proper legal procedure is an interrogation, which, in accordance with the requirements of the CPC, can be conducted both at the place of the pre-trial investigation and at another place, which determines the inexpediency of unnecessary legislative duplication.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Problems of Introducing a Differentiated Approach to "Old" and "New" Minorities in Ukraine 对乌克兰“老”和“新”少数民族实行区别对待的问题
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.284895
Oleksii Husiev
The relevance of the article is due to the reform of the legislative framework on national minorities in Ukraine, which is conditioned by European integration. The purpose of the article is to reveal the problems of identifying persons belonging to "old" minorities in Ukraine and discrimination against "new" minorities. In the course of the research, the author used the dialectical method, logical methods of analysis, synthesis, abstraction, comparative research method, forecasting method, and formal legal method. The author analyzes the provisions of the old inclusive Law of Ukraine "On National Minorities in Ukraine", the new exclusive Law of Ukraine "On National Minorities (Communities) of Ukraine", and some international treaties of Ukraine. The author identifies the problems related to the consolidation of the feature of traditional residence on the territory of Ukraine. The author analyzes the legal status of "new" minorities. It is concluded that the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine "On National Minorities (Communities) of Ukraine" has led to the introduction of a differentiated approach to "old" and "new" minorities in Ukraine, but the shortcomings of this Law make it impossible to determine which national minorities belong to the "old" ones. It is emphasized that the "new" minorities have been discriminated against due to the deprivation of their legal status as national minorities (communities) of Ukraine and equalization with the majority. Recommendations are made to address the identified shortcomings by removing from the concept of "national minority (community) of Ukraine" the feature of traditional residence on the territory of Ukraine and defining precise and clear features of settlements where persons belonging to national minorities (communities) traditionally reside or where they constitute a significant part of the population.
该条的相关性是由于乌克兰少数民族立法框架的改革,这是以欧洲一体化为条件的。这篇文章的目的是揭示在乌克兰识别属于“老”少数民族的人和歧视“新”少数民族的问题。在研究过程中,笔者运用了辩证法、逻辑分析法、综合法、抽象法、比较研究法、预测法、形式法等。分析了乌克兰旧的包容性法《关于乌克兰境内的少数民族》、新乌克兰的排他性法《关于乌克兰境内的少数民族(社区)》以及乌克兰的一些国际条约的规定。作者指出了与乌克兰领土上传统住宅特征的巩固有关的问题。作者分析了“新”少数民族的法律地位。结论是,通过新的乌克兰“乌克兰少数民族(社区)法”导致对乌克兰的“旧”和“新”少数民族采取区别对待的办法,但这项法律的缺点使得无法确定哪些少数民族属于“旧”少数民族。强调指出,“新”少数民族由于被剥夺了作为乌克兰少数民族(社区)的法律地位和与多数民族平等而受到歧视。为了解决已查明的缺点,提出了建议,从“乌克兰少数民族(社区)”的概念中删除乌克兰领土上传统居住的特征,并明确界定少数民族(社区)的人传统居住或他们占人口很大一部分的定居点的特征。
{"title":"Problems of Introducing a Differentiated Approach to \"Old\" and \"New\" Minorities in Ukraine","authors":"Oleksii Husiev","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.284895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.284895","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the article is due to the reform of the legislative framework on national minorities in Ukraine, which is conditioned by European integration. The purpose of the article is to reveal the problems of identifying persons belonging to \"old\" minorities in Ukraine and discrimination against \"new\" minorities. In the course of the research, the author used the dialectical method, logical methods of analysis, synthesis, abstraction, comparative research method, forecasting method, and formal legal method. The author analyzes the provisions of the old inclusive Law of Ukraine \"On National Minorities in Ukraine\", the new exclusive Law of Ukraine \"On National Minorities (Communities) of Ukraine\", and some international treaties of Ukraine. The author identifies the problems related to the consolidation of the feature of traditional residence on the territory of Ukraine. The author analyzes the legal status of \"new\" minorities. It is concluded that the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine \"On National Minorities (Communities) of Ukraine\" has led to the introduction of a differentiated approach to \"old\" and \"new\" minorities in Ukraine, but the shortcomings of this Law make it impossible to determine which national minorities belong to the \"old\" ones. It is emphasized that the \"new\" minorities have been discriminated against due to the deprivation of their legal status as national minorities (communities) of Ukraine and equalization with the majority. Recommendations are made to address the identified shortcomings by removing from the concept of \"national minority (community) of Ukraine\" the feature of traditional residence on the territory of Ukraine and defining precise and clear features of settlements where persons belonging to national minorities (communities) traditionally reside or where they constitute a significant part of the population.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Problems of Legality
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1