首页 > 最新文献

Problems of Legality最新文献

英文 中文
Online Platforms and New Challenges for Modern Law on E-Commerce 网络平台与现代电子商务法律的新挑战
Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.162.284666
Nataliia Filatova-Bilous
This article provides a legal analysis of the nature of online platforms. The subject of the article is widely discussed among modern legal scholars since the legal nature of online platforms is very controversial: it is hard to determine the very essence of services provided by platform operators as well as to ensure fair balance of interests between platform operators and their users. The aim of the article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationships emerging between platforms and their users and to show the main challenges brought about by online platforms for the legal regulation and for legal practice. The author starts with analyzing the notion of online platforms and their role in the transformation of modern economy. A special attention is paid on the essence of sharing economy which is considered as a product of platforms’ activity. Then the legal nature of relationships between platforms and their users is explored, i.e. operator-supplier and operator-customer relationships. In this regard, various cases concerning these relationships as well as the most recent European legal acts regulating platforms are analyzed. The main problems arising in practice of platforms’ activities are discussed and the need to provide an appropriate regulation to address them is explained.
本文对网络平台的性质进行了法律分析。由于网络平台的法律性质存在很大争议,很难确定平台经营者提供的服务的本质,也很难保证平台经营者与用户之间的利益平衡,因此本文的主题在现代法律学者中被广泛讨论。本文的目的是全面分析平台与用户之间的关系,并展示网络平台对法律监管和法律实践带来的主要挑战。本文首先分析了网络平台的概念及其在现代经济转型中的作用。特别关注的是共享经济的本质,它被认为是平台活动的产物。然后探讨了平台与用户之间关系的法律性质,即运营商-供应商关系和运营商-客户关系。在这方面,分析了有关这些关系的各种案例以及最近欧洲监管平台的法律行为。讨论了平台活动在实践中出现的主要问题,并解释了提供适当法规来解决这些问题的必要性。
{"title":"Online Platforms and New Challenges for Modern Law on E-Commerce","authors":"Nataliia Filatova-Bilous","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.284666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.284666","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a legal analysis of the nature of online platforms. The subject of the article is widely discussed among modern legal scholars since the legal nature of online platforms is very controversial: it is hard to determine the very essence of services provided by platform operators as well as to ensure fair balance of interests between platform operators and their users. The aim of the article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationships emerging between platforms and their users and to show the main challenges brought about by online platforms for the legal regulation and for legal practice. The author starts with analyzing the notion of online platforms and their role in the transformation of modern economy. A special attention is paid on the essence of sharing economy which is considered as a product of platforms’ activity. Then the legal nature of relationships between platforms and their users is explored, i.e. operator-supplier and operator-customer relationships. In this regard, various cases concerning these relationships as well as the most recent European legal acts regulating platforms are analyzed. The main problems arising in practice of platforms’ activities are discussed and the need to provide an appropriate regulation to address them is explained.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135296569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Classification of Electronic (Digital) Traces of Criminal Offenses 刑事犯罪电子(数字)痕迹分类
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.278117
A. Kovalenko
With the further development of science and technology, the ways in which offenders use electronic computing devices while committing criminal acts are also changing. Each new method, each manifestation of illegal technology leaves behind specific traces, which in most cases are new for both theorists and practitioners. Identification, extraction and examination of each type of such traces requires unique approaches. Therefore, the task of forensic scientists is to divide the mentioned traces into varieties based on their essential and forensically significant features in order to further develop practical recommendations for working with them. Therefore, the purpose of this article is the formation of a forensic classification of electronic (digital) traces of a criminal offense. To achieve the goal, the methods of generalization, linguistic analysis, formal-legal, formal-logical, comparison, forecasting, analysis and synthesis methods, as well as activity and praxeological approaches in forensic science were used. The author singled out forensically significant features of electronic (digital) traces of a criminal offense and selected three groups of criteria for their classification: according to the features of the trace-forming object, according to the features of computer data as a trace, and according to the features of the carrier (media) of such data (trace-receiving object). Based on the first group of criteria electronic (digital) traces of a criminal offense are divided into varieties according to the trace-forming object; based on the second group of criteria – according to data formatting, according to data content, according to the method of information perception, according to data authenticity, according to the possibility of access; based on the third group – according to the location of the computer data carrier (media), according to the purpose and type of installation of the carrier and by the energy dependence of the storage device of the data carrier. In the author's opinion, scientific research on the further distribution of electronic (digital) traces of criminal offenses into subtypes and the formulation of practically oriented recommendations regarding their detection, collection, examination and use in criminal proceedings are promising.
随着科学技术的进一步发展,罪犯在实施犯罪行为时使用电子计算设备的方式也在发生变化。每一种新方法,每一种非法技术的表现都会留下特定的痕迹,在大多数情况下,这些痕迹对理论家和实践者来说都是新的。识别、提取和检查每一种这样的痕迹都需要独特的方法。因此,法医科学家的任务是根据所提到的痕迹的基本特征和具有法医意义的特征将其划分为不同的种类,以便进一步制定与它们一起工作的实际建议。因此,本文的目的是形成一种刑事犯罪电子(数字)痕迹的法医分类。为实现这一目标,运用了法医学的概括方法、语言分析方法、形式-法律方法、形式-逻辑方法、比较方法、预测方法、分析方法和综合方法以及活动学和行动学方法。笔者挑出刑事犯罪电子(数字)痕迹的法医学显著特征,选取了三组分类标准:根据痕迹形成对象的特征,根据计算机数据作为痕迹的特征,根据该数据的载体(媒介)(痕迹接收对象)的特征。在第一组标准的基础上,将犯罪电子(数字)痕迹按照痕迹形成对象划分为不同的品种;基于第二组标准——根据数据格式,根据数据内容,根据信息感知的方法,根据数据真实性,根据访问的可能性;基于第三组——根据计算机数据载体(介质)的位置,根据载体的安装目的和类型以及对数据载体的存储装置的能量依赖性。作者认为,对刑事犯罪电子(数字)痕迹的进一步分类进行科学研究,并就刑事诉讼中电子(数字)痕迹的侦查、收集、审查和使用提出切合实际的建议是有希望的。
{"title":"Classification of Electronic (Digital) Traces of Criminal Offenses","authors":"A. Kovalenko","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.278117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.278117","url":null,"abstract":"With the further development of science and technology, the ways in which offenders use electronic computing devices while committing criminal acts are also changing. Each new method, each manifestation of illegal technology leaves behind specific traces, which in most cases are new for both theorists and practitioners. Identification, extraction and examination of each type of such traces requires unique approaches. Therefore, the task of forensic scientists is to divide the mentioned traces into varieties based on their essential and forensically significant features in order to further develop practical recommendations for working with them. Therefore, the purpose of this article is the formation of a forensic classification of electronic (digital) traces of a criminal offense. To achieve the goal, the methods of generalization, linguistic analysis, formal-legal, formal-logical, comparison, forecasting, analysis and synthesis methods, as well as activity and praxeological approaches in forensic science were used. The author singled out forensically significant features of electronic (digital) traces of a criminal offense and selected three groups of criteria for their classification: according to the features of the trace-forming object, according to the features of computer data as a trace, and according to the features of the carrier (media) of such data (trace-receiving object). Based on the first group of criteria electronic (digital) traces of a criminal offense are divided into varieties according to the trace-forming object; based on the second group of criteria – according to data formatting, according to data content, according to the method of information perception, according to data authenticity, according to the possibility of access; based on the third group – according to the location of the computer data carrier (media), according to the purpose and type of installation of the carrier and by the energy dependence of the storage device of the data carrier. In the author's opinion, scientific research on the further distribution of electronic (digital) traces of criminal offenses into subtypes and the formulation of practically oriented recommendations regarding their detection, collection, examination and use in criminal proceedings are promising.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128955621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Institute for Exemplary Cases as a Procedural Tool to Ensure the Unity of Judicial Practice 作为程序工具的示范案例研究会确保司法实践的统一
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.273925
O. Popov
The presented research is devoted to the theoretically and practically relevant issue of consideration of exemplary cases by the Supreme Court as a separate procedural tool for ensuring the unity of judicial practice. The purpose of the article is to develop the existing doctrinal views on the problems of functioning of the outlined institute and search for ways to improve the relevant procedures within the national procedural system. Achieving the set goal became possible thanks to the use of a complex of scientific research methods, in particular, dialectical, analysis and synthesis, structural-functional, formal-legal, formal-logical, comparative-legal, etc. Along with the analysis of the legislative categories "typical case" and "exemplary case", the features of such cases, a thorough description of the procedure for consideration of exemplary cases within the special administrative proceedings. The following stages of exemplary proceedings are distinguished as: submission of the case as exemplary; opening proceedings in a exemplary case and publication of a relevant announcement; consideration of the case and adoption of a exemplary decision; review of a exemplary decision. It is argued that the Supreme Court's decision in an exemplary case is the primary goal of ensuring predictability, consistency and uniformity of judicial enforcement in disputes of the same type. In addition, the need to distinguish between the legal opinions of the Supreme Court, formulated in the exemplary decisions and the legal opinions of the Supreme Court, formulated in the decisions on the results of cassation review of court cases, as having a different nature. Special attention is paid to the discussion of the possibility of implementing the institution of exemplary cases in other procedural orders, in particular, civil and economic proceedings. Based on the results of the research, the opinion is supported that despite the existing skepticism among scientists and the fundamental differences in the mechanism of legal regulation of public and private relations, the specificity of some types of private relations, which are characterized by mass, and disputes within the boundaries of which become the subject of judicial proceedings, allows to single out specific typological features of the relevant cases, and therefore, there is a possibility of their exemplary consideration according to the rules of civil procedure. This primarily concerns disputes in the field of consumer protection and tort disputes. In the aspect of the latter, as one of the catalysts for the introduction of the institute under study in civil proceedings, it may be necessary to address the issue of operational protection of civil rights of victims of Russian armed aggression against Ukraine.
所提出的研究致力于理论和实践相关的问题,即最高法院将模范案件作为确保司法实践统一的单独程序工具进行审议。这篇文章的目的是发展关于所概述的研究所运作问题的现有理论观点,并寻求在国家程序制度内改进有关程序的方法。由于运用了一系列科学研究方法,特别是辩证、分析和综合、结构-功能、形式-法律、形式-逻辑、比较-法律等,既定目标的实现成为可能。同时分析了“典型案例”和“示范案例”的立法范畴,分析了这类案例的特点,对特别行政诉讼中典型案例的审议程序进行了深入的阐述。惩戒性诉讼的以下阶段分为:作为惩戒性案件提交;启动示范诉讼并发表有关公告;审议案件并作出惩戒性决定;对一个示范决定的审查。有人认为,最高法院在示范案件中的裁决是确保同类纠纷中司法执行的可预测性、一致性和统一性的主要目标。此外,需要区分最高法院的法律意见,在示范决定中制定的法律意见和最高法院的法律意见,在法院案件的上诉复审结果的决定中制定的法律意见,因为它们具有不同的性质。特别注意讨论在其他程序命令,特别是民事和经济诉讼程序中实施示范案件制度的可能性。研究结果表明,尽管学界存在怀疑,公私关系的法律规制机制也存在根本差异,但由于某些类型的私人关系具有群众性,其边界内的纠纷成为司法程序的主体,因此可以从相关案件中挑选出特定的类型学特征。根据民事诉讼规则,有可能对其进行惩戒性审议。这主要涉及消费者保护领域的纠纷和侵权纠纷。在后一方面,作为在民事诉讼中引入正在研究的研究所的催化剂之一,可能有必要处理对俄罗斯武装侵略乌克兰受害者的公民权利的实际保护问题。
{"title":"The Institute for Exemplary Cases as a Procedural Tool to Ensure the Unity of Judicial Practice","authors":"O. Popov","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.273925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.273925","url":null,"abstract":"The presented research is devoted to the theoretically and practically relevant issue of consideration of exemplary cases by the Supreme Court as a separate procedural tool for ensuring the unity of judicial practice. The purpose of the article is to develop the existing doctrinal views on the problems of functioning of the outlined institute and search for ways to improve the relevant procedures within the national procedural system. Achieving the set goal became possible thanks to the use of a complex of scientific research methods, in particular, dialectical, analysis and synthesis, structural-functional, formal-legal, formal-logical, comparative-legal, etc. Along with the analysis of the legislative categories \"typical case\" and \"exemplary case\", the features of such cases, a thorough description of the procedure for consideration of exemplary cases within the special administrative proceedings. The following stages of exemplary proceedings are distinguished as: submission of the case as exemplary; opening proceedings in a exemplary case and publication of a relevant announcement; consideration of the case and adoption of a exemplary decision; review of a exemplary decision. It is argued that the Supreme Court's decision in an exemplary case is the primary goal of ensuring predictability, consistency and uniformity of judicial enforcement in disputes of the same type. In addition, the need to distinguish between the legal opinions of the Supreme Court, formulated in the exemplary decisions and the legal opinions of the Supreme Court, formulated in the decisions on the results of cassation review of court cases, as having a different nature. Special attention is paid to the discussion of the possibility of implementing the institution of exemplary cases in other procedural orders, in particular, civil and economic proceedings. Based on the results of the research, the opinion is supported that despite the existing skepticism among scientists and the fundamental differences in the mechanism of legal regulation of public and private relations, the specificity of some types of private relations, which are characterized by mass, and disputes within the boundaries of which become the subject of judicial proceedings, allows to single out specific typological features of the relevant cases, and therefore, there is a possibility of their exemplary consideration according to the rules of civil procedure. This primarily concerns disputes in the field of consumer protection and tort disputes. In the aspect of the latter, as one of the catalysts for the introduction of the institute under study in civil proceedings, it may be necessary to address the issue of operational protection of civil rights of victims of Russian armed aggression against Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133785425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Neutral Status to a Course Towards Collective Security: Evolution of Ukraine's Approaches to Ensuring National Security 从中立地位到走向集体安全:乌克兰确保国家安全方法的演变
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.280117
Maksym Romchuk
Permanent neutrality and the organization of collective security is a complex and ambiguous choice that Ukraine has faced since gaining independence. The purpose of the article is to study the evolution of the security policy of independent Ukraine, which has gone a long way from the proclamation of the status of a permanently neutral and non-aligned state to the constitutionally enshrined foreign policy course towards Euro-Atlantic integration. The work uses historical, dogmatic and comparative legal methods in the course of studying the historical aspect of the genesis of national security policy. The author uses the dialectical method to study various ways of ensuring national security, which made it possible to distinguish two ways: the declaration of the status of a permanently neutral state or participation in a collective security organization. The chronological boundaries of the study are defined from the moment of proclamation of Ukraine’s state sovereignty. The article proves that political and scientific debates on the benefits of neutrality or participation in a collective security organization for ensuring the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state, as well as its national security of European countries, are related to the bipolar model of international relations that emerged during the Cold War era. Under these conditions, some European states (Austria, Ireland, Finland, Sweden), despite the negative outcome of World War II, when the status of neutral states was grossly violated, still wanted to stay outside the confrontation between the two military and political blocs. To this end, they declared themselves permanently neutral and participated in the non-aligned movement. The article notes that the departure from the bipolar model has temporarily dampened the debate. However, the policy of revanchism and neo-imperial ideology adopted by the Russian leadership forced European states to rethink the feasibility of maintaining permanent neutrality in the context of the current geopolitical situation. The author reveals that at the time of the creation of the Ukrainian state, the preference for the status of a permanently neutral and non-aligned state as a guarantee of Ukraine’s national security was conditioned by the presence of nuclear weapons on its territory, which made it impossible to participate in the collective security organization (NATO). Ukraine’s nuclear disarmament, which was carried out under pressure from Russia and the United States, opened the way for normalization of relations with the European Union and NATO. At the same time, having chosen NATO membership as a guarantee of successful security, Ukraine in the twenty-first century demonstrated ineffectiveness in realizing its intention due to fluctuations in the foreign policy course of Ukrainian presidents. The aggression against Ukraine launched by Russia in 2014 made participation in the collective security organization (NATO) a matter of time. The app
永久中立和组织集体安全是乌克兰自获得独立以来面临的一个复杂而模糊的选择。本文的目的是研究独立的乌克兰安全政策的演变,从宣布永久中立和不结盟国家的地位到宪法规定的欧洲-大西洋一体化的外交政策路线,乌克兰已经走过了很长的路。在研究国家安全政策起源的历史方面的过程中,使用了历史、教条和比较法的方法。笔者运用辩证的方法对保障国家安全的各种方式进行了研究,从而有可能区分出两种方式:宣布永久中立国地位或参加集体安全组织。研究的时间边界是从乌克兰宣布国家主权的那一刻开始定义的。文章证明,欧洲国家在政治上和科学上对中立或参加集体安全组织对确保国家主权和领土完整以及国家安全的好处的争论,与冷战时期出现的两极国际关系模式有关。在这种情况下,一些欧洲国家(奥地利、爱尔兰、芬兰、瑞典)尽管在第二次世界大战的负面结果中,中立国的地位受到严重侵犯,但仍然希望置身于两个军事和政治集团的对抗之外。为此目的,它们宣布自己永久中立,并参加不结盟运动。文章指出,对两极模式的背离暂时抑制了辩论。然而,俄罗斯领导层采取的复仇主义政策和新帝国主义意识形态迫使欧洲国家重新思考在当前地缘政治形势下保持永久中立的可行性。提交人透露,在乌克兰建国时,作为乌克兰国家安全保障的永久中立和不结盟国家地位的优先考虑受到其领土上存在核武器的限制,这使得它不可能参加集体安全组织(北约)。乌克兰的核裁军是在俄罗斯和美国的压力下进行的,它为与欧盟和北约的关系正常化开辟了道路。与此同时,乌克兰选择加入北约作为成功安全的保证,但由于乌克兰总统外交政策路线的波动,21世纪的乌克兰在实现其意图方面表现出无能。2014年俄罗斯对乌克兰的侵略使得加入集体安全组织(北约)成为一个时间问题。使乌克兰武装部队接近北约的标准在击退俄罗斯的武装侵略方面产生了积极的结果。乌克兰武装部队可以被认为是当今欧洲最有经验的军队,使乌克兰在战后成为令人向往的北约成员国。
{"title":"From Neutral Status to a Course Towards Collective Security: Evolution of Ukraine's Approaches to Ensuring National Security","authors":"Maksym Romchuk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.280117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.280117","url":null,"abstract":"Permanent neutrality and the organization of collective security is a complex and ambiguous choice that Ukraine has faced since gaining independence. The purpose of the article is to study the evolution of the security policy of independent Ukraine, which has gone a long way from the proclamation of the status of a permanently neutral and non-aligned state to the constitutionally enshrined foreign policy course towards Euro-Atlantic integration. The work uses historical, dogmatic and comparative legal methods in the course of studying the historical aspect of the genesis of national security policy. The author uses the dialectical method to study various ways of ensuring national security, which made it possible to distinguish two ways: the declaration of the status of a permanently neutral state or participation in a collective security organization. The chronological boundaries of the study are defined from the moment of proclamation of Ukraine’s state sovereignty. The article proves that political and scientific debates on the benefits of neutrality or participation in a collective security organization for ensuring the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state, as well as its national security of European countries, are related to the bipolar model of international relations that emerged during the Cold War era. Under these conditions, some European states (Austria, Ireland, Finland, Sweden), despite the negative outcome of World War II, when the status of neutral states was grossly violated, still wanted to stay outside the confrontation between the two military and political blocs. To this end, they declared themselves permanently neutral and participated in the non-aligned movement. The article notes that the departure from the bipolar model has temporarily dampened the debate. However, the policy of revanchism and neo-imperial ideology adopted by the Russian leadership forced European states to rethink the feasibility of maintaining permanent neutrality in the context of the current geopolitical situation. The author reveals that at the time of the creation of the Ukrainian state, the preference for the status of a permanently neutral and non-aligned state as a guarantee of Ukraine’s national security was conditioned by the presence of nuclear weapons on its territory, which made it impossible to participate in the collective security organization (NATO). Ukraine’s nuclear disarmament, which was carried out under pressure from Russia and the United States, opened the way for normalization of relations with the European Union and NATO. At the same time, having chosen NATO membership as a guarantee of successful security, Ukraine in the twenty-first century demonstrated ineffectiveness in realizing its intention due to fluctuations in the foreign policy course of Ukrainian presidents. The aggression against Ukraine launched by Russia in 2014 made participation in the collective security organization (NATO) a matter of time. The app","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127198402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Looting: Criminal Law Characteristic 抢劫:刑法特征
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.278849
S. Kharytonov
The article is devoted to the disclosure of the concept of “looting” and the description of the characteristic criminal law elements and signs of this military offense. The relevance of the presented material lies in the fact that there are not enough highly qualified specialists in the field of military-criminal and military-administrative legislation in Ukraine, that has a negative effect on the correct qualification of military offenses, the level of which has significantly increased against the background of full-scale military aggression by the Russian Federation. The aim of the article lies in formulation and suggestions regarding a decision on peculiarities of the criminal law characteristics of looting and distinguishing this offense from the related offenses against property. The research is based on the use of scientific methods of general scientific and special-legal levels. The obtained results allow to claim that looting is a crime of war or local armed conflict, committed by violent or non-violent means of misappropriation of personal belongings of the killed or wounded. The place of commission of this war crime can only be a battlefield or rear areas which are subjected to artillery, mortar, and rocket fire.
本文对“抢劫”的概念进行了揭示,并对这一军事犯罪的特征刑法要素和特征进行了描述。所提材料的相关性在于,乌克兰在军事刑事和军事行政立法领域没有足够的高素质专家,这对军事犯罪的正确定性产生了消极影响,而在俄罗斯联邦全面军事侵略的背景下,军事犯罪的水平已大大提高。本文的目的在于对抢劫犯罪的刑法特征特点的界定以及与相关的财产犯罪的区别提出建议。研究的基础是运用一般科学和特殊法律层面的科学方法。所取得的结果使人可以声称抢劫是一种战争罪或地方武装冲突罪,是通过暴力或非暴力手段侵吞被杀或受伤者的个人物品而犯下的。犯下这一战争罪行的地点只能是遭受炮火、迫击炮和火箭弹袭击的战场或后方地区。
{"title":"Looting: Criminal Law Characteristic","authors":"S. Kharytonov","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.278849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.278849","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the disclosure of the concept of “looting” and the description of the characteristic criminal law elements and signs of this military offense. The relevance of the presented material lies in the fact that there are not enough highly qualified specialists in the field of military-criminal and military-administrative legislation in Ukraine, that has a negative effect on the correct qualification of military offenses, the level of which has significantly increased against the background of full-scale military aggression by the Russian Federation. The aim of the article lies in formulation and suggestions regarding a decision on peculiarities of the criminal law characteristics of looting and distinguishing this offense from the related offenses against property. The research is based on the use of scientific methods of general scientific and special-legal levels. The obtained results allow to claim that looting is a crime of war or local armed conflict, committed by violent or non-violent means of misappropriation of personal belongings of the killed or wounded. The place of commission of this war crime can only be a battlefield or rear areas which are subjected to artillery, mortar, and rocket fire.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116553052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Challenges as a Driving Force for the Modernization of Social Statehood in Europe 挑战作为欧洲社会国家现代化的推动力
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.281091
A. Fedorova, Olha Holovashchenko
One of the most significant social achievements of the twentieth century was the development and implementation of the welfare state concept within the framework of the theory of a democratic, rule-of-law state which ensures the best option for social and economic development, as well as political stability in society. It is proved that although, since the 1970s, some economists, political scientists and lawyers have periodically sharply criticized the concept of the welfare State, predicting its decline, the positive results of its transformation in European countries, as well as the development of the European Social Community within the European Union, show that the welfare State has a chance not only to survive, but also to remain one of the fundamental principles of statehood in democratic countries, and an element of the supranational organization of power embodied in the European Union.The purpose of the article is to analyze the traditional and new challenges to the welfare state which determine the change of approaches to its functioning and priorities at the current stage of development of state-legal and interstate (integration) relations.The key idea that structures the study is the thesis that European states that form a united Europe or aspire to join it, such as Ukraine, despite belonging to the same civilizational community, retain the right to choose how to respond to the economic, social, demographic, migration, environmental and climate challenges of our time. This choice determines the future of national welfare state models. In accordance with the stated goal, the article identifies two groups of major challenges: established (demographic changes, in particular, population aging; changes in the position of women in society and in the labor market; changes in the labor market; poverty and social exclusion) and new (rapid growth of emigration of Ukrainian doctors and nurses; introduction of artificial intelligence technologies; uncontrolled mass immigration; rapid growth of disability in society) faced by the welfare state and, mainly, the social security system, which is its foundation. While the established challenges require adjustments to the priorities and tasks of the welfare state, the newest ones require a significant modernization of the welfare state, adapting it to the new political, economic and social conditions of society.Further research on the selected issues should be conducted taking into account the existence of certain models of the welfare state that unite European states either by geographical (Scandinavian, continental, Anglo-Saxon, Southern European) or ideological (liberal, conservative, social democratic, corporate, solidarity) criteria.The problem of the welfare state's response to the challenges of environmental and climate crises deserves separate development, and in the context of this consideration, the correlation between the social and environmental (“green”) state.
20世纪最重要的社会成就之一是在民主法治国家理论框架内发展和实施福利国家概念,以确保社会和经济发展的最佳选择,以及社会的政治稳定。事实证明,尽管自20世纪70年代以来,一些经济学家、政治学家和律师定期尖锐地批评福利国家的概念,预测其衰落,但福利国家在欧洲国家转型的积极成果以及欧盟内部欧洲社会共同体的发展表明,福利国家不仅有机会生存下去,而且仍然是民主国家国家地位的基本原则之一。以及欧盟所体现的超国家权力组织的一个要素。本文的目的是分析福利国家面临的传统挑战和新挑战,这些挑战决定了福利国家在国家法律和州际(一体化)关系发展的当前阶段,其运作方式和优先事项的变化。构成这项研究的关键思想是这样一种论点,即组成一个统一的欧洲或渴望加入欧洲的欧洲国家,如乌克兰,尽管属于同一个文明共同体,但仍有权选择如何应对我们这个时代的经济、社会、人口、移民、环境和气候挑战。这一选择决定了国家福利国家模式的未来。根据既定目标,文章确定了两组主要挑战:既定(人口变化,特别是人口老龄化;妇女在社会和劳动力市场上地位的变化;劳动力市场的变化;贫困和社会排斥)和新的(乌克兰医生和护士移民的快速增长;引入人工智能技术;不受控制的大规模移民;残疾人在社会中的快速增长)所面临的福利国家,主要是社会保障制度,这是它的基础。虽然既定的挑战需要调整福利国家的优先事项和任务,但最新的挑战需要福利国家的重大现代化,使其适应社会的新的政治、经济和社会条件。对所选问题的进一步研究应考虑到某些福利国家模式的存在,这些模式以地理(斯堪的纳维亚、大陆、盎格鲁-撒克逊、南欧)或意识形态(自由主义、保守主义、社会民主主义、企业、团结)标准将欧洲国家联合起来。福利国家应对环境和气候危机挑战的问题值得单独发展,在这种考虑的背景下,社会和环境(“绿色”)国家之间的相关性。
{"title":"Challenges as a Driving Force for the Modernization of Social Statehood in Europe","authors":"A. Fedorova, Olha Holovashchenko","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.281091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.281091","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most significant social achievements of the twentieth century was the development and implementation of the welfare state concept within the framework of the theory of a democratic, rule-of-law state which ensures the best option for social and economic development, as well as political stability in society. It is proved that although, since the 1970s, some economists, political scientists and lawyers have periodically sharply criticized the concept of the welfare State, predicting its decline, the positive results of its transformation in European countries, as well as the development of the European Social Community within the European Union, show that the welfare State has a chance not only to survive, but also to remain one of the fundamental principles of statehood in democratic countries, and an element of the supranational organization of power embodied in the European Union.The purpose of the article is to analyze the traditional and new challenges to the welfare state which determine the change of approaches to its functioning and priorities at the current stage of development of state-legal and interstate (integration) relations.The key idea that structures the study is the thesis that European states that form a united Europe or aspire to join it, such as Ukraine, despite belonging to the same civilizational community, retain the right to choose how to respond to the economic, social, demographic, migration, environmental and climate challenges of our time. This choice determines the future of national welfare state models. In accordance with the stated goal, the article identifies two groups of major challenges: established (demographic changes, in particular, population aging; changes in the position of women in society and in the labor market; changes in the labor market; poverty and social exclusion) and new (rapid growth of emigration of Ukrainian doctors and nurses; introduction of artificial intelligence technologies; uncontrolled mass immigration; rapid growth of disability in society) faced by the welfare state and, mainly, the social security system, which is its foundation. While the established challenges require adjustments to the priorities and tasks of the welfare state, the newest ones require a significant modernization of the welfare state, adapting it to the new political, economic and social conditions of society.Further research on the selected issues should be conducted taking into account the existence of certain models of the welfare state that unite European states either by geographical (Scandinavian, continental, Anglo-Saxon, Southern European) or ideological (liberal, conservative, social democratic, corporate, solidarity) criteria.The problem of the welfare state's response to the challenges of environmental and climate crises deserves separate development, and in the context of this consideration, the correlation between the social and environmental (“green”) state.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116012842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Updated Grounds for Filing a Cassation Appeal: Constitutional Limitation or Constitutional Violation? 提出上诉的最新理由:宪法限制还是违反宪法?
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.274470
Kira Shestopal
The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that the latest judicial reform has provoked a considerable influence on procedural relations and caused a number of problems for legal practitioners. The development of the main theoretical provisions took place since the 70s of the last century. In these studies, considerable attention was always paid to the procedural possibilities of applying to the court of first instance. At the same time, since the restoration of Ukrainian statehood, scientists have researched the value, limits of powers and, in general, the status of the Supreme Court in Ukraine. Ukraine has gone through many judicial reforms, most of which related to the courts of first instance and appeals. The main novelty, of the latest judicial reform, to which attention is paid in the article, is the updated grounds for filing a cassation appeal. Ukraine has declared a European course and adds all efforts to become part of the European family. That is why the latest judicial reform, which introduced these novellas, was carried out in the context of the European course. At the same time, the legal regulation of the possibility of applying to the court of cassation, actually restrict the constitutional rights and freedoms of a citizen, does not meet the standards announced in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and in the European standards, which became the main problem. The purpose of the article is to study the working documents that accompanied the relevant bills on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine on justice, decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, the Supreme Court, as well as decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the ECHR). The achievement of the outlined goal became possible due to the use of a set of methods of information analysis and synthesis. The article highlights and analyzes the working documents that accompanied the constitutional amendments on justice, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the Supreme Court, the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, with the aim of identifying substantive disagreements and shortcomings. It is emphasized that the changes (at the constitutional and legislative level) actually restrict the content and scope of rights and freedoms, regarding the possibility of cassation appeal of court decisions, which were guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine and do not meet the principle of legal certainty. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were formulated and recommendations were made on the implementation of the right to appeal to the court of cassation.
这一专题之所以具有相关性,是因为最近的司法改革对程序关系产生了相当大的影响,并给法律从业人员带来了一些问题。主要理论规定的发展始于上世纪70年代。在这些研究中,总是相当注意向初审法院提出申请的程序可能性。与此同时,自乌克兰恢复国家地位以来,科学家们对乌克兰最高法院的价值、权力限制以及总体地位进行了研究。乌克兰经历了许多司法改革,其中大多数涉及初审法院和上诉法院。本文所关注的最新司法改革的主要新颖之处是更新了提起上诉的理由。乌克兰已宣布走欧洲路线,并尽一切努力成为欧洲大家庭的一部分。这就是为什么引入这些中篇小说的最新司法改革是在欧洲课程的背景下进行的。同时,对上诉法院适用可能性的法律规定,实际上限制了公民的宪法权利和自由,不符合乌克兰宪法法院判决和欧洲标准中宣布的标准,这成为主要问题。本文的目的是研究有关乌克兰宪法司法修正案的相关法案、乌克兰宪法法院、最高法院的决定以及欧洲人权法院(以下简称欧洲人权法院)的决定所附带的工作文件。由于使用了一套资料分析和综合的方法,所概述的目标得以实现。本文强调并分析了有关司法的宪法修正案所附带的工作文件、乌克兰宪法法院和最高法院的裁决、欧洲人权法院的做法,目的是找出实质性的分歧和缺点。强调指出,这些变化(在宪法和立法一级)实际上限制了权利和自由的内容和范围,涉及法院判决的撤销上诉的可能性,这些权利和自由受到乌克兰宪法的保障,不符合法律确定性原则。根据这项研究的结果,就执行向最高法院上诉的权利拟订了结论并提出了建议。
{"title":"Updated Grounds for Filing a Cassation Appeal: Constitutional Limitation or Constitutional Violation?","authors":"Kira Shestopal","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.274470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.274470","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that the latest judicial reform has provoked a considerable influence on procedural relations and caused a number of problems for legal practitioners. The development of the main theoretical provisions took place since the 70s of the last century. In these studies, considerable attention was always paid to the procedural possibilities of applying to the court of first instance. At the same time, since the restoration of Ukrainian statehood, scientists have researched the value, limits of powers and, in general, the status of the Supreme Court in Ukraine. Ukraine has gone through many judicial reforms, most of which related to the courts of first instance and appeals. The main novelty, of the latest judicial reform, to which attention is paid in the article, is the updated grounds for filing a cassation appeal. Ukraine has declared a European course and adds all efforts to become part of the European family. That is why the latest judicial reform, which introduced these novellas, was carried out in the context of the European course. At the same time, the legal regulation of the possibility of applying to the court of cassation, actually restrict the constitutional rights and freedoms of a citizen, does not meet the standards announced in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and in the European standards, which became the main problem. The purpose of the article is to study the working documents that accompanied the relevant bills on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine on justice, decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, the Supreme Court, as well as decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the ECHR). The achievement of the outlined goal became possible due to the use of a set of methods of information analysis and synthesis. The article highlights and analyzes the working documents that accompanied the constitutional amendments on justice, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the Supreme Court, the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, with the aim of identifying substantive disagreements and shortcomings. It is emphasized that the changes (at the constitutional and legislative level) actually restrict the content and scope of rights and freedoms, regarding the possibility of cassation appeal of court decisions, which were guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine and do not meet the principle of legal certainty. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were formulated and recommendations were made on the implementation of the right to appeal to the court of cassation.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134345947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of Judges' Legal Considerations Against the Sale of Joint Assets Without the Wife's Agreement in the Study of Positive Law in Indonesia 印尼成文法研究中法官对无妻子同意出售共同财产的法律考量分析
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.272475
Galang Lazuardi, S. ., S. Kunarti
The sale and purchase of land rights is usually carried out by means of an agreement or what is known as a land rights sale and purchase agreement. In the case of the transfer of land rights, the formal conditions for the sale and purchase of land rights must be proven by a deed of sale and purchase drawn up by and before an authorized official. Before the sale and purchase agreement is carried out, it is usually done with the initial agreement which the deed is drawn up by a notary. The responsibilities of a notary as a public official include the responsibilities of the notary profession itself which are related to the deed, including, the responsibility of a notary in civil terms for the deed he makes relates to the material truth of the deed. Then regarding joint assets that are sold without the consent of the husband and/or wife, is it possible, and does the notary have any responsibility for that. Then there is a court decision regarding joint assets which legalizes the sale and purchase deed because of the good faith buyer's consideration as stipulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter No.  7 of 2012. The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of a Notary related to the sale and purchase of joint assets and the legal considerations of judges who decide cases based on a circular letter which is not a general rule but an internal one that is not well known to the public. The research method used is normative, using secondary data obtained from library research including primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The responsibility of the notary, namely in making the deed of sale and purchase of joint property, is a civil responsibility, that is, all the regulations regulated in the UUJN only provide sanctions for violations of a formal notary, for example the rules for issuing deed and others. Judges should in deciding a case use general rules that are understood and understood by the community instead of using internal rules from the court itself which are not understood by the community, especially regarding buyers with good intentions. 
土地权利的买卖通常是通过协议或所谓的土地权利买卖协议来进行的。在土地权利转让的情况下,土地权利买卖的正式条件必须由经授权的官员起草的买卖契约证明。在签订买卖协议之前,通常会先签订由公证人起草的初始协议。公证员作为公职人员的责任包括公证职业本身与契约有关的责任,包括公证员对其所作契约的民事责任与契约的实质真实性有关。那么对于未经丈夫和/或妻子同意而出售的共同资产,是否有可能,公证员对此是否负有责任。然后,根据最高法院2012年第7号通函的规定,法院就共同资产作出裁决,根据善意买方的对价,使买卖契约合法化。本研究的目的是分析公证人与共同资产买卖有关的责任,以及根据传函判决案件的法官的法律考虑,传函不是一般规则,而是不为公众所熟知的内部规则。使用的研究方法是规范的,使用从图书馆研究中获得的二手数据,包括一级,二级和三级法律来源。公证人的责任,即签发共同财产买卖契约的责任,是一种民事责任,也就是说,欧盟规定的所有条例只规定对违反正式公证的行为的制裁,例如签发契约的规则和其他规定。法官在裁决案件时应使用社会理解和理解的一般规则,而不是使用社会不理解的法院本身的内部规则,特别是对于有良好意图的买家。
{"title":"Analysis of Judges' Legal Considerations Against the Sale of Joint Assets Without the Wife's Agreement in the Study of Positive Law in Indonesia","authors":"Galang Lazuardi, S. ., S. Kunarti","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.272475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.272475","url":null,"abstract":"The sale and purchase of land rights is usually carried out by means of an agreement or what is known as a land rights sale and purchase agreement. In the case of the transfer of land rights, the formal conditions for the sale and purchase of land rights must be proven by a deed of sale and purchase drawn up by and before an authorized official. Before the sale and purchase agreement is carried out, it is usually done with the initial agreement which the deed is drawn up by a notary. The responsibilities of a notary as a public official include the responsibilities of the notary profession itself which are related to the deed, including, the responsibility of a notary in civil terms for the deed he makes relates to the material truth of the deed. Then regarding joint assets that are sold without the consent of the husband and/or wife, is it possible, and does the notary have any responsibility for that. Then there is a court decision regarding joint assets which legalizes the sale and purchase deed because of the good faith buyer's consideration as stipulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter No.  7 of 2012. The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of a Notary related to the sale and purchase of joint assets and the legal considerations of judges who decide cases based on a circular letter which is not a general rule but an internal one that is not well known to the public. The research method used is normative, using secondary data obtained from library research including primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The responsibility of the notary, namely in making the deed of sale and purchase of joint property, is a civil responsibility, that is, all the regulations regulated in the UUJN only provide sanctions for violations of a formal notary, for example the rules for issuing deed and others. Judges should in deciding a case use general rules that are understood and understood by the community instead of using internal rules from the court itself which are not understood by the community, especially regarding buyers with good intentions.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134432050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Influence of Martial Law on the Activities of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and Military Administrations 戒严法对乌克兰内阁部长和军事行政当局活动的影响
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.283096
Valeriia Korelova, Ya. Ryabchenko, Anna Solodka
The relevance of this topic is determined to the fact that during the introduction of the legal regime of martial law, the activities of public authorities, in particular the executive, have certain peculiarities/ On February 24, 2022, the President of Ukraine, based on the proposal of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, in accordance with clause 20, part 1 of Article 106 of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine "On Legal Martial Law" introduced the martial law regime in connection with the invasion of the Russian Federation in Ukraine, which stipulate for changes in the work of executive authorities, in particular the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, and cause to the formation of military administrations. The purpose of the article is to study of the legal nature of the martial law regime and the procedure for its introduction, to reveal the main peculiarities of the activities of the executive authorities, in particular the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and military administrations, during the introduction of the martial law regime, as well as the study of their interaction with each other. Achieving the outlined purpose became possible for the application of the used complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular, the dialectical method (for comprehensive knowledge of the nature of the legal regime of martial law and its conduct, determination of the order of formation and functions of military administrations, analysis of the peculiarities of the activity of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine), the formal-legal method (for establishing the content of legal norms), the formal-logical method (to identify deficiencies in national legal regulation), the comparative-legal method (to study the experience of other countries and determine the procedures for introducing the legal regime of martial law), communicative method (to determine the influence of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on military administrations and to analyze the directions of their interaction). The review of the current legislation of Ukraine and the legislative acts of other countries regarding the procedure for conducting and legal regulation of the martial law regime are analyzed. The nature of the emergence of military administrations has been analyzed, and it has been found that they are temporary bodies of executive power for the period of martial law. It is noted that is placed on their powers to ensure law and order and support the country's defense capability in the settlements under their control. The peculiarities of the activity of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine during the period of martial law were studied. The directions of interaction between the military administrations and the Cabinet of Ministers to ensure the functioning of all areas of the country's life have been clarified. According to the results of the study on avoiding any divergence in law enforcement approaches in the future, separate proposals were m
本专题之所以与此相关,是因为在实行戒严法的法律制度期间,公共当局,特别是行政当局的活动具有某些特点/ 2022年2月24日,乌克兰总统根据乌克兰国家安全和国防委员会的建议,根据第20条,乌克兰宪法第106条第1部分和乌克兰法律“关于合法戒严法”介绍了与俄罗斯联邦入侵乌克兰有关的戒严法制度,其中规定改变行政当局,特别是乌克兰部长内阁的工作,并导致组建军事行政当局。本文的目的是研究戒严制度的法律性质及其实施程序,揭示行政当局,特别是乌克兰内阁部长和军事行政当局在实施戒严制度期间活动的主要特点,以及研究它们之间的相互作用。通过运用科学知识方法,特别是辩证方法(全面了解戒严法法律制度的性质及其行为,确定军事行政当局的组建顺序和职能,分析乌克兰内阁部长活动的特点),正式法律方法(建立法律规范的内容),可以实现概述的目的,形式逻辑方法(找出国家法律规定的不足之处)、比较法律方法(研究其他国家的经验并确定引入戒严法律制度的程序)、交流方法(确定乌克兰内阁对军事行政的影响并分析其相互作用的方向)。对乌克兰现行立法和其他国家关于实施戒严制度的程序和法律规制的立法行为的审查进行了分析。对军事行政当局出现的性质进行了分析,认为军事行政当局是在戒严时期临时行使行政权力的机构。委员会指出,在其控制下的定居点,他们被赋予确保法律和秩序并支持该国国防能力的权力。研究了戒严令期间乌克兰内阁部长活动的特点。军事行政当局和部长内阁之间为确保国家生活所有领域的运作而相互作用的方向已得到澄清。根据关于避免今后在执法方法上出现任何分歧的研究结果,提出了单独的建议,以加强乌克兰部长内阁军事行政当局的问责制。
{"title":"The Influence of Martial Law on the Activities of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and Military Administrations","authors":"Valeriia Korelova, Ya. Ryabchenko, Anna Solodka","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.283096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.283096","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of this topic is determined to the fact that during the introduction of the legal regime of martial law, the activities of public authorities, in particular the executive, have certain peculiarities/ On February 24, 2022, the President of Ukraine, based on the proposal of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, in accordance with clause 20, part 1 of Article 106 of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine \"On Legal Martial Law\" introduced the martial law regime in connection with the invasion of the Russian Federation in Ukraine, which stipulate for changes in the work of executive authorities, in particular the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, and cause to the formation of military administrations. The purpose of the article is to study of the legal nature of the martial law regime and the procedure for its introduction, to reveal the main peculiarities of the activities of the executive authorities, in particular the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and military administrations, during the introduction of the martial law regime, as well as the study of their interaction with each other. Achieving the outlined purpose became possible for the application of the used complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular, the dialectical method (for comprehensive knowledge of the nature of the legal regime of martial law and its conduct, determination of the order of formation and functions of military administrations, analysis of the peculiarities of the activity of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine), the formal-legal method (for establishing the content of legal norms), the formal-logical method (to identify deficiencies in national legal regulation), the comparative-legal method (to study the experience of other countries and determine the procedures for introducing the legal regime of martial law), communicative method (to determine the influence of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on military administrations and to analyze the directions of their interaction). The review of the current legislation of Ukraine and the legislative acts of other countries regarding the procedure for conducting and legal regulation of the martial law regime are analyzed. The nature of the emergence of military administrations has been analyzed, and it has been found that they are temporary bodies of executive power for the period of martial law. It is noted that is placed on their powers to ensure law and order and support the country's defense capability in the settlements under their control. The peculiarities of the activity of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine during the period of martial law were studied. The directions of interaction between the military administrations and the Cabinet of Ministers to ensure the functioning of all areas of the country's life have been clarified. According to the results of the study on avoiding any divergence in law enforcement approaches in the future, separate proposals were m","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"254 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114292656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Responsibility of Notary in Making Nominee Agreements for Foreign Citizens in Indonesia 公证员在印尼为外国公民制定指定协议中的责任
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.21564/2414-990x.161.278003
Ali Masum, S. ., Tri Prihatinah
Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles in Article 2 states that every Indonesian citizen has full rights over land, water, and airspace located in Indonesia, so only Indonesian citizens are entitled to have ownership rights over land in Indonesia. This is a principle of nationalism in agrarian law. Foreigners who are in Indonesia are only entitled to land use rights in Indonesia. This regulation sometimes poses difficulties for foreign nationals who want to invest in Indonesia, due to the requirement of land ownership in Indonesia not being fulfilled. This obstacle causes some parties to take illegal actions in land ownership in Indonesia, one of which is by making a nominee agreement. However, nominee agreements in Indonesia have not been clearly regulated in legislation. The issues raised in this research are the validity of nominee agreements according to the Civil Code and Basic Agrarian Law, as well as the role and responsibility of notaries in making nominee agreements, using the case study of the verdict of the Denpasar District Court Number 426/Pdt.G/2020/PN Dps. To answer these issues, normative juridical research method with prescriptive research method is used. The result of the analysis and research is to analyze the nominee agreement and its validity from the perspective of the Civil Code and Basic Agrarian Law. In addition, it analyzes the role and responsibility of notaries in nominee agreements with a case study in the verdict of the Denpasar District Court Number 426/Pdt.G/2020/PN Dps. The suggestion given is that notaries in making a legal product should pay attention to the applicable legal foundations in Indonesia so that the resulting deed is in accordance with the legislation in Indonesia
1960年关于基本土地原则的第5号法律第2条规定,每个印度尼西亚公民对印度尼西亚境内的土地、水和领空享有充分权利,因此只有印度尼西亚公民才有权对印度尼西亚境内的土地拥有所有权。这是土地法中的民族主义原则。在印尼的外国人只享有在印尼的土地使用权。这一规定有时会给想要在印度尼西亚投资的外国人带来困难,因为没有满足在印度尼西亚拥有土地的要求。这一障碍导致一些当事方在印度尼西亚土地所有权问题上采取非法行动,其中之一就是签订代持协议。然而,印度尼西亚的代持协议尚未在立法中得到明确规定。本文以登巴萨地区法院第426/Pdt号判决书为案例,探讨了《民法典》和《农业基本法》中代持协议的效力问题,以及公证人在代持协议中的作用和责任。G / 2020 / PN Dps。为了回答这些问题,运用规范性研究方法和规定性研究方法。分析研究的结果是从民法典和《基本土法》的角度来分析代持协议及其效力。此外,本文还以登巴萨地区法院第426/Pdt号判决书为例,分析了公证人在代理协议中的作用和责任。G / 2020 / PN Dps。建议公证员在制作法律产品时,应注意印尼适用的法律基础,使所产生的契约符合印尼的立法
{"title":"The Responsibility of Notary in Making Nominee Agreements for Foreign Citizens in Indonesia","authors":"Ali Masum, S. ., Tri Prihatinah","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.278003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.278003","url":null,"abstract":"Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles in Article 2 states that every Indonesian citizen has full rights over land, water, and airspace located in Indonesia, so only Indonesian citizens are entitled to have ownership rights over land in Indonesia. This is a principle of nationalism in agrarian law. Foreigners who are in Indonesia are only entitled to land use rights in Indonesia. This regulation sometimes poses difficulties for foreign nationals who want to invest in Indonesia, due to the requirement of land ownership in Indonesia not being fulfilled. This obstacle causes some parties to take illegal actions in land ownership in Indonesia, one of which is by making a nominee agreement. However, nominee agreements in Indonesia have not been clearly regulated in legislation. The issues raised in this research are the validity of nominee agreements according to the Civil Code and Basic Agrarian Law, as well as the role and responsibility of notaries in making nominee agreements, using the case study of the verdict of the Denpasar District Court Number 426/Pdt.G/2020/PN Dps. To answer these issues, normative juridical research method with prescriptive research method is used. The result of the analysis and research is to analyze the nominee agreement and its validity from the perspective of the Civil Code and Basic Agrarian Law. In addition, it analyzes the role and responsibility of notaries in nominee agreements with a case study in the verdict of the Denpasar District Court Number 426/Pdt.G/2020/PN Dps. The suggestion given is that notaries in making a legal product should pay attention to the applicable legal foundations in Indonesia so that the resulting deed is in accordance with the legislation in Indonesia","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132001736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Problems of Legality
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1