Cuadernos de Bioetica最新文献

n recent decades there has been an undeniable inflationary process of human rights that has contributed to their trivialization and consequent discrediting. It is not surprising that after the third generation of rights there is no longer agreement on the content and scope of the following generations, which include rights whose subject is not the human being (but nature, the environment or animals) or, if it is, the individual claims from the State his right to satisfy a desire that he feels is necessary for his personal development. The emergence of ″desire-rights″ is the clearest proof of this inflationary and arbitrary process of human rights, radically transforming the entire human rights system. This article studies the emergence of these desire-rights, showing their historical origins and main philosophical presuppositions, as well as their most common characteristic features.

This paper analyses the prenatal representations on motherhood of 15 Spanish primiparous women who were in the dilemma of whether or not to continue with their pregnancies. Based on a qualitative methodological approach, semi-structured interviews were carried out which included in their design theoretical approaches of the so-called Maternal Constellation of Daniel Stern (1997). Through a content analysis of the interviews, an absence of mental representations of the baby in terms of both physical and characterological appearance was found in the sample, possibly due to the emotional impact generated by the news of the pregnancy. This absence of representations of the baby would reveal the importance of support and/or accompaniment by social and health care providers. It would also reveal the importance of the law in force maintaining the time for reflection, which, implemented with personalised, face-to-face and verbal counselling, would allow women who find themselves in this situation to choose freely, by providing them with all the information on alternatives for continuing their pregnancy with support and accompaniment.

Health care for trans people has not been among the priorities of Bioethics, so that in most of the manuals of this discipline there is no reference to this issue, or it is covered in a rather simple or measured way. However, it is necessary to note that in the last decade the bioethical debate, on gender issues in general and on transsexualism in particular, has increased significantly. This work seeks to offer the transsexual person, the health professional or the student on the trans topic tools to articulate their particular bioethical reflection. It has two clearly differentiated parts. In the first, the aspects that are considered necessary to consider when assessing the ethics of a gender change intervention are presented. In the second part, a reflection is offered on the lines of argument that support the different bioethical currents..

It is common base the teaching of bioethics on the learning of the principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, widely used today. In terms of ethical practice, these principles suffer from a notable inadequacy, leaving aside their ambiguity and other problems. Nevertheless, as a teaching method, they show a special incongruity, for several reasons: a) little adequacy of the terms to the concepts that want to be expressed, b) formalism that hinders the approach to reality, c) little adaptation to the needs of the student and d) be specialized terms in a field that should be fundamentally informative. These four limitations, which advise another approach in the teaching of bioethics, are examined in detail; a final reflection is provided on the difference between the principles of bioethics and ethics.

The so-called ″eugenic″ abortion has an extraordinary differential nuance compared to the other legally established modalities of abortion, which is specified in the way the woman's decision is formed, which is not prior, but a consequence of medical information received about the foetus; a decision, moreover, in which there is a clear ″discriminatory″ component, since the abortion is produced exclusively because of the disability of the foetus. This uniqueness requires attention to the context in which eugenic decisions are made, because they involve three fundamental elements which, depending on how they are made, may or may not lead to abortion: firstly, the opportunity to carry out certain prenatal tests in the absence of risk factors. Secondly, the enormous responsibility of health professionals in informing parents about the results of a prenatal test. Thirdly, the point of view of future parents, who should avoid a eugenic conception of parenthood, being aware that what is developing in the woman's womb is their son or daughter, not a generic embryo affected by anomalies; and that a son or daughter is a personal reality,beyond his o her capabilities. The paper addresses these three issues, which make eugenic abortion a discriminatory and avoidable practice, since the aim is not to prevent the woman's decision to abort, but to endorse her primary decision to continue with the pregnancy on the basis of a positive, non-eugenic view of disability.

Twenty-five years ago, in 1998, the Italian Parliament approved to implement clinical trials in patients with advanced cancer to know the efficacy of an alternative cancer treatment that associated hormones, vitamins and, occasionally, chemotherapy proposed by Professor Luigi Di Bella. It was the answer to people demanding Public Health assume the cost of this therapy. Although parallel phase II trials in various tumors demonstrated the lack of activity, some professionals have continued to use this method since then and have published apparently promising results a few various scientific journals. This real example raises three interesting ethical scenarios. The first one is the ethics of alternative treatments proposed by medical professionals or from the academic field. In these cases, the difficulty in differentiating between hypothesis and real efficacy. This problem impacts on patients and relatives' expectations who must face a potentially fatal disease with little or no hope of a cure with traditional treatments. The second scenario is the design and good practice in the development of clinical trials, which was also the subject of debate in relation to the Di Bella method. And the last one, the ethics of scientific publications. Di Bella's followers published since 2000 12 papers with limited quality on series of patients treated with his method, the majority in a pay-per-publication journal of which Giuseppe Di Bella, son of Professor Di Bella, is included in the board of editors.

Organic Law 3/2021, of March 24, regulating euthanasia, has intensified a harsh debate. A priori, it is a conflict of bioethical values and a different anthropological vision between the different parties, however, we must not forget that perhaps before considering any debate, it is necessary to correctly interpret what the patient really wants when he states that he wants to die. In our health system and in our society, there are certain traits and needs of the person that are ignored, and that urgently require attention for the patient. Discovering the meaning of one's life, considering human transcendence, finding personal order and being able to experience love are vital elements of life, which at such a critical moment as high-grade suffering or imminent death, require all the attention of the health personnel. All this can contrast sharply with the values of our society, not dedicating adequate attention to it, among other reasons, due to the effort involved in carrying out comprehensive care of this type, thus making it much easier to carry out the procedures required by law regulation of euthanasia than addressing such intimate deficiencies of the being, despite the fact that these may be the real problem of the patient, who in his dramatic experience asks for help.

This article describes the elaboration process of the new Spanish Code of Medical Deontology ap- proved by the General Assembly of the General Council of Medical Colleges of Spain in December 2022. The reasons for updating the deontological rules, the works carried out, the principles followed in the development of the Code and the most relevant new rules are described.

Medical practice has two main dimensions, one scientific and the other human, and in both, the commitment of the doctor is essential. Medical deontology, as a branch of ethics that deals with the duties and obligations of doctors, embodies in the codes of deontology the ethical principles and standards of mandatory compliance. From this point, medical practice should guarantee that patients receive an quality medical care, and to be treated with dignity and respect. In December 2022, the General Council of Official Medical Associations of Spain published a new version of the Spanish Code of Medical Ethics that aims, among other purposes, to standardize medical care of scientific and human quality. Medical practice supported by scientifically-based medicine, lex artis medica, patient safety, professional responsibility, honesty and integrity are some of the aspects that in this updated document of medical ethics frame and define the work of the doctor for a performance of medicine with quality.