Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00001
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"Front matter","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"28 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120901309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00005
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"List of abbreviations","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133613037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00002
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"Dedication","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134007547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00011
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
In February 2000, yet another IGC, the fourth since the entry into force of the SEA in 1987, inaugurated its workings with the explicit objective to arrive at a resolution on the so-called ‘Amsterdam leftovers’. That is to say, on those decisions that should have been decided upon during the June 1997 Amsterdam Summit, where a pronouncement had not proved possible. This was no easy task given the animosity of the deliberations during the Amsterdam process and the high stakes drawn in case of breakdown and, by extension, a likely collapse of the integration process: the next round of enlargement involving up to twelve new member states from Central and Eastern Europe, Malta and Cyprus. A special Protocol attached to the AMT on ‘the enlargement and the institutions of the Union’ stated thus:
{"title":"The Treaty of Nice and its critics","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00011","url":null,"abstract":"In February 2000, yet another IGC, the fourth since the entry into force of the SEA in 1987, inaugurated its workings with the explicit objective to arrive at a resolution on the so-called ‘Amsterdam leftovers’. That is to say, on those decisions that should have been decided upon during the June 1997 Amsterdam Summit, where a pronouncement had not proved possible. This was no easy task given the animosity of the deliberations during the Amsterdam process and the high stakes drawn in case of breakdown and, by extension, a likely collapse of the integration process: the next round of enlargement involving up to twelve new member states from Central and Eastern Europe, Malta and Cyprus. A special Protocol attached to the AMT on ‘the enlargement and the institutions of the Union’ stated thus:","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122459336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00009
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
The SEA and beyond In the mid-1980s, the whole scene became dominated by claims of a ‘neofunctionalist comeback’ – modified in nature, yet easily discernible in scope. Processes of negative integration primarily at the market level were linked with the development of a wide range of policies covering almost all spheres of regional co-operation. Neofunctionalist ‘spillovers’ were envisaged for the transformation of a ‘Business Europe’ to a ‘People’s Europe’: the functions of the larger management system seemed to have produced not only new expectations but also new pressures for further integration. But the institutional evolution of the Community was lagging behind its (re)emerging neofunctionalist ambitions. The SEA did not represent a qualitative leap towards a ‘self-regulating pluralist society’ at the regional level, or even towards high levels of political autonomy on the part of supranational institutions. Although it needs to be pointed out that the Delors Commission did try to develop an independent strategy for managing the ‘1992 process’ and to exploit its enormous publicity – a project supported at the time by even the most ‘reluctant’ Europeans including British Prime Minister Thatcher – the states once again found ways of resisting any substantive movement towards a profound transformation of the Community system: supranationalism championed in areas where the states wanted to see progress, such as the implementation of the single market programme (and even here there was to be a target date rather than a legally binding date for its completion). In those areas where national interests were, or appeared to be, at stake, such as European Political Co-operation (EPC) that was merely codified in a legal text, intergovernmentalism effectively prevailed as the dominant mode of decision-taking. Moreover, no subsequent alteration of the locus of sovereignty emerged as a result of 2
{"title":"New directions in theory-building","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00009","url":null,"abstract":"The SEA and beyond In the mid-1980s, the whole scene became dominated by claims of a ‘neofunctionalist comeback’ – modified in nature, yet easily discernible in scope. Processes of negative integration primarily at the market level were linked with the development of a wide range of policies covering almost all spheres of regional co-operation. Neofunctionalist ‘spillovers’ were envisaged for the transformation of a ‘Business Europe’ to a ‘People’s Europe’: the functions of the larger management system seemed to have produced not only new expectations but also new pressures for further integration. But the institutional evolution of the Community was lagging behind its (re)emerging neofunctionalist ambitions. The SEA did not represent a qualitative leap towards a ‘self-regulating pluralist society’ at the regional level, or even towards high levels of political autonomy on the part of supranational institutions. Although it needs to be pointed out that the Delors Commission did try to develop an independent strategy for managing the ‘1992 process’ and to exploit its enormous publicity – a project supported at the time by even the most ‘reluctant’ Europeans including British Prime Minister Thatcher – the states once again found ways of resisting any substantive movement towards a profound transformation of the Community system: supranationalism championed in areas where the states wanted to see progress, such as the implementation of the single market programme (and even here there was to be a target date rather than a legally binding date for its completion). In those areas where national interests were, or appeared to be, at stake, such as European Political Co-operation (EPC) that was merely codified in a legal text, intergovernmentalism effectively prevailed as the dominant mode of decision-taking. Moreover, no subsequent alteration of the locus of sovereignty emerged as a result of 2","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115231089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00016
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"Index","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117041079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-30DOI: 10.7765/9781526137920.00004
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"List of tables","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7765/9781526137920.00004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137920.00004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115681526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-04-22DOI: 10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0003
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"The Amsterdam reforms","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121635763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-04-22DOI: 10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0007
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"Debating the future of Europe","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122192637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-04-22DOI: 10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0005
Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis
{"title":"Geopolitical imperatives of system change","authors":"Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, Michael J. Tsinisizelis, S. Stavridis, Kostas Ifantis","doi":"10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719049910.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436916,"journal":{"name":"Theory and reform in the European Union","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130766968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：