{"title":"Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengedar Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Kota Tanjung Balai","authors":"","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.149","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127960456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hidayat Bastanta Sitepu, Syafruddin Kalo, Edi Yunara, Marlina
The purpose of law in general to bring about or create harmony in society is clearly a noble goal as the implementation of the correctional system which is imbued with the spirit of protection which became the forerunner to the formation of a distinctive Indonesian strafrechtstheorien. We want a criminal theory that is built in addition to paying attention to developments in the international/global order, the growth of legislation (top down) but also maintaining legal values that live and are maintained in people's lives. Withdrawal of a complaint is a process in which one of the litigants wants to settle/resolve the problem in good faith because he feels that the case has been resolved by means of a family mechanism. This often happens, especially in cases of a complaint offense, the regulation on the revocation of complaints has been regulated in the provisions of Article 75 of the Criminal Code regarding the period of revocation of complaints within 3 months. In practice, there are several cases that have expired/expired in withdrawing a complaint, it is allowed to be revoked by the panel of judges. It is interesting why, because on the one hand, de jure revocation of complaints over time cannot be withdrawn and must be carried out by law, on the other hand the judge as a mouthpiece of justice overrides this provision with the consideration that "the balance is disturbed if peace and harmony are hindered by regulations". The approach method in this research is the statutory approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. By researching primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. the technique used is by means of library research. The results of the study explain that the regulation regarding the revocation of complaints that have expired has no provisions that regulate it, only limited to the revocation of complaints with a period of 3 months, namely in Article 75 of the Criminal Code. And the current legal developments, especially the judiciary, there are things that are becoming increasingly legal breakthroughs through the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court no. 1600 K/Pid/2009 which decides may withdraw the complaint even though the time has passed/expired. Of course, this must be considered in order to form rules that specifically regulate the expiration of a complaint revocation process.
{"title":"Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Pencabutan Pengaduan Yang Melewati Batas Waktu Dengan Menerapkan Pendekatan Restorative Justice (Analisis Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung No. 1600 K/Pid/2009 dan Putusan No. 2238 K/Pid.Sus/2013)","authors":"Hidayat Bastanta Sitepu, Syafruddin Kalo, Edi Yunara, Marlina","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.101","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of law in general to bring about or create harmony in society is clearly a noble goal as the implementation of the correctional system which is imbued with the spirit of protection which became the forerunner to the formation of a distinctive Indonesian strafrechtstheorien. We want a criminal theory that is built in addition to paying attention to developments in the international/global order, the growth of legislation (top down) but also maintaining legal values that live and are maintained in people's lives. Withdrawal of a complaint is a process in which one of the litigants wants to settle/resolve the problem in good faith because he feels that the case has been resolved by means of a family mechanism. This often happens, especially in cases of a complaint offense, the regulation on the revocation of complaints has been regulated in the provisions of Article 75 of the Criminal Code regarding the period of revocation of complaints within 3 months. In practice, there are several cases that have expired/expired in withdrawing a complaint, it is allowed to be revoked by the panel of judges. It is interesting why, because on the one hand, de jure revocation of complaints over time cannot be withdrawn and must be carried out by law, on the other hand the judge as a mouthpiece of justice overrides this provision with the consideration that \"the balance is disturbed if peace and harmony are hindered by regulations\". The approach method in this research is the statutory approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. By researching primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. the technique used is by means of library research. The results of the study explain that the regulation regarding the revocation of complaints that have expired has no provisions that regulate it, only limited to the revocation of complaints with a period of 3 months, namely in Article 75 of the Criminal Code. And the current legal developments, especially the judiciary, there are things that are becoming increasingly legal breakthroughs through the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court no. 1600 K/Pid/2009 which decides may withdraw the complaint even though the time has passed/expired. Of course, this must be considered in order to form rules that specifically regulate the expiration of a complaint revocation process.","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126330376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hendi Setiawan, Syafruddin Kalo, M. Ekaputra, Edi Yunara
Criminalism emphasizes preventive functions aimed at preventing the community from committing a crime. The idea of a criminal proportionality was more related to the objectives of criminal plots by the judge who was contained in his decision, as the defendant had to be sentenced to be convicted with his actions. One example of occurs in cases of perpetrators who circulated narcotics contained in Decision No. 669 / PID.SUS / 2018 / PN.BTM. Based on the background description, the problems studied, namely: how to arrange criminal plotting law against criminal acts, how the philosophy of criminal plotting against the perpetrators of criminal circulation of narcotics, and how to apply the principle of proportionality of criminal law in criminal aride against narcotics circulation perpetrators in the decision no . 669 / PID.SUS / 2018 / PN.BTM. The research method used in this study is a type of normative legal research, which is supported by primary and secondary data sources, and qualitative analysis is carried out. The results of the study, namely the regulation of criminal plotting law on the perpetrators of the crime in Article 54 of the Criminal Code Bill said that in the possession must be considered a form of error of the perpetrators, motives and the purpose of committing a criminal act, and / or the value of law and justice that lived in society. The philosophy of criminal plotting against the perpetrators of criminal circulation of narcotics as a judge in deciding a case must have consideration according to the principle of justice. Application of Proportional Propheorality of Criminal Law in Decision No. 669 / PID.SUS / 2018 / PN.BTM that it is still less proportional between criminalizations with the actions he has done, because the actions taken by the perpetrators are not due to the basis of intention and the intention arranged, but the act of the perpetrators only as people who happen to be invited without knowing what he will do
{"title":"Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Peredaran Narkotika (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 669/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Btm)","authors":"Hendi Setiawan, Syafruddin Kalo, M. Ekaputra, Edi Yunara","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.132","url":null,"abstract":"Criminalism emphasizes preventive functions aimed at preventing the community from committing a crime. The idea of a criminal proportionality was more related to the objectives of criminal plots by the judge who was contained in his decision, as the defendant had to be sentenced to be convicted with his actions. One example of occurs in cases of perpetrators who circulated narcotics contained in Decision No. 669 / PID.SUS / 2018 / PN.BTM. Based on the background description, the problems studied, namely: how to arrange criminal plotting law against criminal acts, how the philosophy of criminal plotting against the perpetrators of criminal circulation of narcotics, and how to apply the principle of proportionality of criminal law in criminal aride against narcotics circulation perpetrators in the decision no . 669 / PID.SUS / 2018 / PN.BTM. The research method used in this study is a type of normative legal research, which is supported by primary and secondary data sources, and qualitative analysis is carried out. The results of the study, namely the regulation of criminal plotting law on the perpetrators of the crime in Article 54 of the Criminal Code Bill said that in the possession must be considered a form of error of the perpetrators, motives and the purpose of committing a criminal act, and / or the value of law and justice that lived in society. The philosophy of criminal plotting against the perpetrators of criminal circulation of narcotics as a judge in deciding a case must have consideration according to the principle of justice. Application of Proportional Propheorality of Criminal Law in Decision No. 669 / PID.SUS / 2018 / PN.BTM that it is still less proportional between criminalizations with the actions he has done, because the actions taken by the perpetrators are not due to the basis of intention and the intention arranged, but the act of the perpetrators only as people who happen to be invited without knowing what he will do","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134392476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Studi Komparatif Terhadap Kepailitan Perusahaan Asuransi Syariah Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU)","authors":"","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.131","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132189300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As a condition for the crime of treason, the initial element of attempted treason itself, so that it can be said that the fundamental error lies in the prosecutor's error in prosecuting the actions of the defendants, so the legal analysis states that the prosecutor's demands in this case are what make the application of the law imposed incompatible with panel of judges .
{"title":"Analisis Unsur Permulaan Pelaksanaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Makar","authors":"Farizky Siregar, Alvi Syahrin, M. Ekaputra","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.133","url":null,"abstract":"As a condition for the crime of treason, the initial element of attempted treason itself, so that it can be said that the fundamental error lies in the prosecutor's error in prosecuting the actions of the defendants, so the legal analysis states that the prosecutor's demands in this case are what make the application of the law imposed incompatible with panel of judges .","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115280187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Analisis Akta Wasiat Atas Harta Bersama Yang Dilaksanakan Setelah Suami Meninggal Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Agama No: 2304/Pdt.G/2017/PA Medan","authors":"","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.147","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133009923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fungsi Pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah Yang Bersih Dan Bebas Korupsi (Studi Kasus Di DPRK Aceh Timur)","authors":"","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.134","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124223434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Seseorang Yang Mengetahui Di Sekitar Lingkungannya Terdapat Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sibolga No: 17/Pid.B/2014/PN.Sbg)","authors":"","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121664578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The sovereignty of a country in the sea is very dependent on the ability of the state to physically prevent the sea area it controls. The wider the sea area controlled by a country, the greater the responsibility of the state to oversee it. Indonesia has stated that it will assume responsibility for the prevention of this vast sea area, which has an area of 5.8 million square kilometers, of which 60% of the area is a marine area under the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesian territorial waters, especially border areas, need to be managed properly for the utilization of natural resources in the vicinity so that they can be used for the welfare of the people. There are many problems faced by the Indonesian government in managing the territorial waters of the country, one of which is Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing (IUU Fishing) or what we usually know as illegal fishing. Illegal fishing has caused multidimensional impacts related to economic, social, cultural and environmental aspects. This is a logical consequence of the function of the sea as an ecosystem in which it contains three basic functions, namely yield (production), environmental and social. This type of research is a normative juridical research. How are the legal provisions governing the criminal act of illegal fishing, how is the law enforcement process against illegal fishing, and what are the obstacles in the law enforcement process and what are the solutions or efforts that should be made so that the law enforcement process against illegal crimes fishing can be carried out properly. The legal provisions regarding the criminal act of illegal fishing are contained in Article 1 point 5 of Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries, fishing is an activity that obtains fish in waters that are not in a state of being cultivated with tools or equipment. in any way, including activities that use ships to load, transport, store, cool, handle, process, and/or preserve them. Law enforcement is an effort made so that the law can function and run properly and is obeyed by everyone. Law enforcement in a narrow sense is carried out by the Police, Prosecutors, Courts and Correctional Institutions
{"title":"Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing Di Wilayah Kerja Kejaksaan Negeri Serdang Bedagai","authors":"F. Hasibuan","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.105","url":null,"abstract":"The sovereignty of a country in the sea is very dependent on the ability of the state to physically prevent the sea area it controls. The wider the sea area controlled by a country, the greater the responsibility of the state to oversee it. Indonesia has stated that it will assume responsibility for the prevention of this vast sea area, which has an area of 5.8 million square kilometers, of which 60% of the area is a marine area under the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesian territorial waters, especially border areas, need to be managed properly for the utilization of natural resources in the vicinity so that they can be used for the welfare of the people. There are many problems faced by the Indonesian government in managing the territorial waters of the country, one of which is Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing (IUU Fishing) or what we usually know as illegal fishing. Illegal fishing has caused multidimensional impacts related to economic, social, cultural and environmental aspects. This is a logical consequence of the function of the sea as an ecosystem in which it contains three basic functions, namely yield (production), environmental and social. This type of research is a normative juridical research. How are the legal provisions governing the criminal act of illegal fishing, how is the law enforcement process against illegal fishing, and what are the obstacles in the law enforcement process and what are the solutions or efforts that should be made so that the law enforcement process against illegal crimes fishing can be carried out properly. The legal provisions regarding the criminal act of illegal fishing are contained in Article 1 point 5 of Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries, fishing is an activity that obtains fish in waters that are not in a state of being cultivated with tools or equipment. in any way, including activities that use ships to load, transport, store, cool, handle, process, and/or preserve them. Law enforcement is an effort made so that the law can function and run properly and is obeyed by everyone. Law enforcement in a narrow sense is carried out by the Police, Prosecutors, Courts and Correctional Institutions","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114382956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There are many facts that occur that the perpetrators of money laundering crimes commit money laundering crimes from the proceeds of their crimes and most are obtained from criminal acts of corruption. Money laundering actors carry out various modes to eliminate traces of their actions. Money Laundering (Money Laudring) as a crime has a characteristic that this crime is not a single crime but a double crime. The point is that the crime of Money Laundering is a form of crime committed by either a person or a corporation, although the prosecutor has the authority to combine corruption and money laundering cases, we rarely see the merger between these two crimes. This type of research is a normative juridical research. With the main problem in the form of How is the relationship between corruption as a Predicate Crime in Money Laundering? How is the prosecutor in carrying out his authority to combine Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? What are the Prosecutor's Barriers in Merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? In every anti-money laundering provision there must be an element called a predicate offence, which means that from the results of any crime that can be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Crimes Money laundering. The crime of Corruption and Money Laundering has a very fundamental relationship or relationship. If there is a merger of investigations into cases of corruption and money laundering, the Prosecutor must make a description of the two crimes in one indictment so that the indictment is in the form of an alternative and the Prosecutor must prove the two crimes before the trial. Based on Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP), it is stated that the Public Prosecutor can combine cases and make them into one indictment, if at the same time or almost simultaneously they receive several case files. The prosecutor's obstacle in merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes is that it requires a long investigation time, because investigators must always coordinate with PPATK (Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center) to track money and assets of the suspect and coordinate with related parties, in court against the trial process, namely the course of the trial process will take a long time
{"title":"Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penggabungan Perkara Korupsi Dan Money Laundering (Studi Kejaksaan Tinggi Sumatera Utara)","authors":"Ismail Koto","doi":"10.55357/is.v2i2.103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.103","url":null,"abstract":"There are many facts that occur that the perpetrators of money laundering crimes commit money laundering crimes from the proceeds of their crimes and most are obtained from criminal acts of corruption. Money laundering actors carry out various modes to eliminate traces of their actions. Money Laundering (Money Laudring) as a crime has a characteristic that this crime is not a single crime but a double crime. The point is that the crime of Money Laundering is a form of crime committed by either a person or a corporation, although the prosecutor has the authority to combine corruption and money laundering cases, we rarely see the merger between these two crimes. This type of research is a normative juridical research. With the main problem in the form of How is the relationship between corruption as a Predicate Crime in Money Laundering? How is the prosecutor in carrying out his authority to combine Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? What are the Prosecutor's Barriers in Merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes? In every anti-money laundering provision there must be an element called a predicate offence, which means that from the results of any crime that can be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Article 4 and Article 5 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Crimes Money laundering. The crime of Corruption and Money Laundering has a very fundamental relationship or relationship. If there is a merger of investigations into cases of corruption and money laundering, the Prosecutor must make a description of the two crimes in one indictment so that the indictment is in the form of an alternative and the Prosecutor must prove the two crimes before the trial. Based on Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP), it is stated that the Public Prosecutor can combine cases and make them into one indictment, if at the same time or almost simultaneously they receive several case files. The prosecutor's obstacle in merging Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering Crimes is that it requires a long investigation time, because investigators must always coordinate with PPATK (Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center) to track money and assets of the suspect and coordinate with related parties, in court against the trial process, namely the course of the trial process will take a long time","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131405166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：