首页 > 最新文献

Journal of International Education in Business最新文献

英文 中文
High-impact practices (HIPs) benefits from study abroad country agent: a multi-method multi-perspective approach 高影响力实践(HIPs)受益于出国留学国家代理:一个多方法多视角的方法
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-01-2023-0003
M. Rickard, Doreen E. Sams, Jeniffer Sams
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to extend the Blevins et al. (2020) study by empirically examining the benefits of using a customized study abroad host-country provider (hereafter referred to as “SAA”) of logistical and other services that support non-native host country (hereafter referred to as non-indigenous) college of business study abroad educators. This study also makes a significant contribution by extending Strange and Gibson’s (2017) call by examining transformative learning experiences (TLEs), a high-impact practice, from educators’ and students’ perspectives of two types of study abroad experiences (i.e. one with and one without an SAA).Design/methodology/approachA mixed methods and multiple perspectives triangulation of the three studies (i.e. student survey, student-produced artifacts data and faculty interviews conducted in Canada, Spain and the UK) was used for this study to increase confidence in the findings by providing a comprehensive picture of the results. A mixed methodology provides rich, in-depth data for analysis as to how study abroad experience [hereafter referred to as experience(s) abroad] benefits from contracting with an SAA to work with a non-indigenous business course educator.FindingsThis study's findings demonstrate the positive impact of transformative learning from a short-term study abroad experience from contracting with an SAA.Practical implicationsBenefits of contracting with a host-country SAA are increased time and a reduction in the emotional toll on educators. Educators are free to provide memorable international business educational experiences abroad, resulting in student satisfaction and transformative learning.Originality/valueThe originality of this study is the mixed methods and multiple perspectives approach to the topic.
本研究的目的是扩展Blevins等人(2020)的研究,通过实证检验使用定制留学东道国供应商(以下简称“SAA”)的后勤和其他服务的好处,以支持非本地东道国(以下简称“非本地”)商学院留学教育工作者。本研究还扩展了Strange和Gibson(2017)的呼吁,从教育工作者和学生的角度对两种类型的留学经历(即一种有SAA,一种没有SAA)进行了研究,研究了变革性学习经验(TLEs),这是一种高影响力的实践。设计/方法学/方法本研究采用了混合方法和对三项研究(即在加拿大、西班牙和英国进行的学生调查、学生制作的文物数据和教师访谈)的多角度三角测量,通过提供结果的全面图片来增加对研究结果的信心。一种混合的方法提供了丰富而深入的数据,用于分析留学经历(以下简称海外经历)如何受益于与SAA签订合同,与非本土商业课程教育者合作。研究结果本研究的结果证明了与SAA签约的短期海外学习经历对变革性学习的积极影响。实际意义与东道国SAA签订合同的好处是增加了时间,减少了教育工作者的情感损失。教育工作者可以自由地在国外提供令人难忘的国际商业教育经验,从而提高学生的满意度和变革性学习。独创性/价值本研究的独创性在于混合方法和多角度的研究方法。
{"title":"High-impact practices (HIPs) benefits from study abroad country agent: a multi-method multi-perspective approach","authors":"M. Rickard, Doreen E. Sams, Jeniffer Sams","doi":"10.1108/jieb-01-2023-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-01-2023-0003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this study is to extend the Blevins et al. (2020) study by empirically examining the benefits of using a customized study abroad host-country provider (hereafter referred to as “SAA”) of logistical and other services that support non-native host country (hereafter referred to as non-indigenous) college of business study abroad educators. This study also makes a significant contribution by extending Strange and Gibson’s (2017) call by examining transformative learning experiences (TLEs), a high-impact practice, from educators’ and students’ perspectives of two types of study abroad experiences (i.e. one with and one without an SAA).\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A mixed methods and multiple perspectives triangulation of the three studies (i.e. student survey, student-produced artifacts data and faculty interviews conducted in Canada, Spain and the UK) was used for this study to increase confidence in the findings by providing a comprehensive picture of the results. A mixed methodology provides rich, in-depth data for analysis as to how study abroad experience [hereafter referred to as experience(s) abroad] benefits from contracting with an SAA to work with a non-indigenous business course educator.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This study's findings demonstrate the positive impact of transformative learning from a short-term study abroad experience from contracting with an SAA.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000Benefits of contracting with a host-country SAA are increased time and a reduction in the emotional toll on educators. Educators are free to provide memorable international business educational experiences abroad, resulting in student satisfaction and transformative learning.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The originality of this study is the mixed methods and multiple perspectives approach to the topic.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82187490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How do business educators prepare students better about ethical decision-making? 商业教育工作者如何让学生更好地做好道德决策的准备?
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-02-2022-0013
Hauthikim Do
PurposeThis paper aims to identify predictors that affect business student perceptions on ethical decision-making. This paper also investigates how those predictors impact the decision-making related to ethical matters among Vietnamese business students.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted to collect data for testing the hypotheses. Questionnaires were administered to 500 Vietnamese business students from four public and private universities. The independent t-test was applied to the usable sample to analyze and derive relationships.FindingsThe empirical results showed that idealism and relativism significantly predict the perception of ethical decision-making. Idealism and relativism were found to influence high ethical decision-making significantly.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the literature on ethical decision-making in a transitional economy. New findings and insights from the research serve as a foundation for future research with ethics and decision-making topics. The results offer some insights to business schools in improving their ethical teaching courses and to businesses in their recruitment.
目的本研究旨在找出影响商科学生伦理决策认知的预测因子。本文也调查了这些预测因素如何影响越南商科学生有关伦理问题的决策。设计/方法/方法进行了一项调查以收集数据以检验假设。对来自四所公立和私立大学的500名越南商科学生进行了问卷调查。使用独立t检验对可用样本进行分析和推导关系。实证结果表明,理想主义和相对主义对伦理决策感知有显著的预测作用。理想主义和相对主义对高道德决策有显著影响。原创性/价值本研究对转型经济中伦理决策的文献研究有所贡献。研究的新发现和见解为未来的伦理和决策主题研究奠定了基础。研究结果为商学院改善道德教学课程和企业招聘提供了一些启示。
{"title":"How do business educators prepare students better about ethical decision-making?","authors":"Hauthikim Do","doi":"10.1108/jieb-02-2022-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-02-2022-0013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to identify predictors that affect business student perceptions on ethical decision-making. This paper also investigates how those predictors impact the decision-making related to ethical matters among Vietnamese business students.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A survey was conducted to collect data for testing the hypotheses. Questionnaires were administered to 500 Vietnamese business students from four public and private universities. The independent t-test was applied to the usable sample to analyze and derive relationships.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The empirical results showed that idealism and relativism significantly predict the perception of ethical decision-making. Idealism and relativism were found to influence high ethical decision-making significantly.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The study contributes to the literature on ethical decision-making in a transitional economy. New findings and insights from the research serve as a foundation for future research with ethics and decision-making topics. The results offer some insights to business schools in improving their ethical teaching courses and to businesses in their recruitment.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88351580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Juxtaposing the “shareholder” and “stakeholder” views of corporate governance: a pedagogical structure for classroom discussion 并列公司治理的“股东”和“利益相关者”观点:课堂讨论的教学结构
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-11-2022-0078
G. Callanan, Sandra M. Tomkowicz, Megan V. Teague, David F. Perri
PurposeThis study aims to present a pedagogical approach that allows students to discuss and debate the differences between two competing models of corporate governance – the shareholder primacy philosophy and the stakeholder value viewpoint.Design/methodology/approachThis study first presents the conceptual bases for each framework, noting that while shareholder primacy is the historically dominant approach to corporate governance that guide strategic business actions in the USA, pressures from investor and societal groups and government agencies have forced publicly traded companies to recognize the need to take stakeholder interests into account in strategic decision-making, as is the dominant model in Europe and other parts of the world. This study then provides a pedagogical structure on how these opposing perspectives can be used to foster discussion, debate and reflection within the classroom.FindingsThis paper presents a pedagogical structure that allows students to recognize the competing pressures that businesses face of maximizing profits versus concerns over social causes. There are a number of positive pedagogical outcomes that can be realized from a classroom discourse on the differing perspectives on strategic management, corporate governance and social responsibility.Practical implicationsThis pedagogical structure should help future business leaders throughout the world understand the differences between the two models of corporate governance. This study offers suggestions on how this pedagogical structure can be used in the student assessment process.Originality/valueThis study fills a gap in the literature by providing a pedagogical structure to guide discussion and debate on the competing theories of corporate governance and how organizational decision-makers can devise strategies to manage the potential competing demands that can arise from the shareholder versus stakeholder models. It is highly relevant and well-suited for courses such as Business Law, Business Policy, Business and Society and Ethics.
本研究旨在提供一种教学方法,让学生讨论和辩论两种相互竞争的公司治理模式-股东至上哲学和利益相关者价值观之间的差异。本研究首先提出了每个框架的概念基础,并指出虽然股东至上是历史上主导公司治理的方法,指导美国的战略商业行动,但来自投资者、社会团体和政府机构的压力迫使上市公司认识到在战略决策中考虑利益相关者利益的必要性。这是欧洲和世界其他地区的主导模式。然后,这项研究提供了一个教学结构,说明如何利用这些对立的观点来促进课堂上的讨论、辩论和反思。本文提出了一种教学结构,使学生能够认识到企业面临的利润最大化与对社会原因的关注的竞争压力。通过对战略管理、公司治理和社会责任的不同观点的课堂讨论,可以实现许多积极的教学成果。实践意义这种教学结构应该有助于世界各地未来的商业领袖理解这两种公司治理模式之间的差异。本研究就如何在学生评估过程中使用这种教学结构提出了建议。原创性/价值本研究通过提供教学结构来指导讨论和辩论公司治理的竞争理论,以及组织决策者如何设计策略来管理股东与利益相关者模型可能产生的潜在竞争需求,从而填补了文献中的空白。它与商业法、商业政策、商业与社会与道德等课程高度相关,非常适合。
{"title":"Juxtaposing the “shareholder” and “stakeholder” views of corporate governance: a pedagogical structure for classroom discussion","authors":"G. Callanan, Sandra M. Tomkowicz, Megan V. Teague, David F. Perri","doi":"10.1108/jieb-11-2022-0078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-11-2022-0078","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims to present a pedagogical approach that allows students to discuss and debate the differences between two competing models of corporate governance – the shareholder primacy philosophy and the stakeholder value viewpoint.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This study first presents the conceptual bases for each framework, noting that while shareholder primacy is the historically dominant approach to corporate governance that guide strategic business actions in the USA, pressures from investor and societal groups and government agencies have forced publicly traded companies to recognize the need to take stakeholder interests into account in strategic decision-making, as is the dominant model in Europe and other parts of the world. This study then provides a pedagogical structure on how these opposing perspectives can be used to foster discussion, debate and reflection within the classroom.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This paper presents a pedagogical structure that allows students to recognize the competing pressures that businesses face of maximizing profits versus concerns over social causes. There are a number of positive pedagogical outcomes that can be realized from a classroom discourse on the differing perspectives on strategic management, corporate governance and social responsibility.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000This pedagogical structure should help future business leaders throughout the world understand the differences between the two models of corporate governance. This study offers suggestions on how this pedagogical structure can be used in the student assessment process.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This study fills a gap in the literature by providing a pedagogical structure to guide discussion and debate on the competing theories of corporate governance and how organizational decision-makers can devise strategies to manage the potential competing demands that can arise from the shareholder versus stakeholder models. It is highly relevant and well-suited for courses such as Business Law, Business Policy, Business and Society and Ethics.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79748215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiential learning during lockdown: a teaching case describing intercultural competency development through the mechanism of reflection using different digital teaching methods 封锁期间的体验式学习:一个通过不同数字教学方法的反思机制来描述跨文化能力发展的教学案例
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-06-2022-0044
Friederike Kittelmann, Patricia Kraft, E. Schmid
PurposeBased on the necessity for universities through the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic to switch to online teaching from one day to the other, this study aims to show how a combination of different online teaching approaches makes it possible to activate reflection as an enabler of intercultural competency development even though real experience, interaction and exchange elements could not be implemented as usual.Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on insights on experiential learning using intercultural competence development through the mechanism of reflection in combination with findings from on- and offline learning settings and informal learning processes. Adapting Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning cycle, this study presents an online course design for an undergraduate course in intercultural competencies. This study delineates an assessment of the course based on student evaluation results and excerpts of student essays.FindingsThis study demonstrates how the acquisition of important future skills such as reflection skills can be successfully mastered by combining different online teaching approaches. This study also shows that Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning cycle continues to yield critical benefits when adapted it to the “new reality.”Originality/valueThis study provides a case study on how business schools can deal with special challenges in courses where competencies are taught, which are usually developed through real experiences or informal learning. An application to other types of experiential learning activities is considered valuable. It is useful to further adopt elements in a post-COVID-19 teaching environment. Especially using apps as described can contribute to make learning more tailored to each student. As such, this paper contributes to the body of research on the importance of reflection skills in an educational and virtual context.
基于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间大学需要从一天到另一天切换到在线教学的必要性,本研究旨在展示不同在线教学方法的组合如何能够激活反思,从而促进跨文化能力的发展,即使真实的经验、互动和交流元素无法像往常一样实施。设计/方法/方法本研究基于通过反思机制结合线上和线下学习环境和非正式学习过程的发现,利用跨文化能力发展的体验式学习的见解。根据Kolb(1984)的体验式学习周期,本研究提出了跨文化能力本科课程的在线课程设计。本研究根据学生的评估结果和学生论文的摘录来描述课程的评估。研究结果本研究展示了如何通过结合不同的在线教学方法成功掌握重要的未来技能,如反思技能。这项研究还表明,Kolb(1984)的体验式学习周期在适应“新现实”时继续产生关键的好处。原创性/价值本研究提供了一个案例研究,说明商学院如何在教授能力的课程中应对特殊挑战,这些能力通常是通过实际经验或非正式学习培养的。应用于其他类型的体验式学习活动被认为是有价值的。在新冠肺炎疫情后的教学环境中进一步采纳相关要素是有益的。特别是使用上述应用程序可以使学习更适合每个学生。因此,本文有助于研究反思技能在教育和虚拟环境中的重要性。
{"title":"Experiential learning during lockdown: a teaching case describing intercultural competency development through the mechanism of reflection using different digital teaching methods","authors":"Friederike Kittelmann, Patricia Kraft, E. Schmid","doi":"10.1108/jieb-06-2022-0044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-06-2022-0044","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Based on the necessity for universities through the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic to switch to online teaching from one day to the other, this study aims to show how a combination of different online teaching approaches makes it possible to activate reflection as an enabler of intercultural competency development even though real experience, interaction and exchange elements could not be implemented as usual.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This study is based on insights on experiential learning using intercultural competence development through the mechanism of reflection in combination with findings from on- and offline learning settings and informal learning processes. Adapting Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning cycle, this study presents an online course design for an undergraduate course in intercultural competencies. This study delineates an assessment of the course based on student evaluation results and excerpts of student essays.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This study demonstrates how the acquisition of important future skills such as reflection skills can be successfully mastered by combining different online teaching approaches. This study also shows that Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning cycle continues to yield critical benefits when adapted it to the “new reality.”\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This study provides a case study on how business schools can deal with special challenges in courses where competencies are taught, which are usually developed through real experiences or informal learning. An application to other types of experiential learning activities is considered valuable. It is useful to further adopt elements in a post-COVID-19 teaching environment. Especially using apps as described can contribute to make learning more tailored to each student. As such, this paper contributes to the body of research on the importance of reflection skills in an educational and virtual context.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76416662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Increasing global mindset through collaborative online international learning (COIL): internationalizing the undergraduate international business class 通过合作在线国际学习(COIL)增强全球思维:国际化本科国际商务课程
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-08-2022-0054
Fernando Garcia, Stephen Ray Smith, A. Burger, M. Helms
PurposeThis study aims to provide a case example of two partner institutions and business faculty who creatively used a collaborative online international learning (COIL) experience during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and transition to online learning to internationalize an undergraduate business class and use existing technology to offer a case study project to further students’ global mindset.Design/methodology/approachUsing open-ended qualitative comments from an American college and a Peruvian university, researchers uncovered key themes from a virtual COIL-based learning experience offered as part of an international business class.FindingsStudent end-of-course evaluation comments from both countries validated the success of the learning experience and value of working together with other students and faculty in a virtual setting.Research limitations/implicationsAreas for future research are provided to extend these initial exploratory findings. However, the implications are clear that the methodology is also appropriate in nonpandemic situations and can quickly bring a global mindset to remote corners of the globe and ensure all students experience the “virtual” study abroad, even when there are travel limitations or budget restrictions for students or the institutions.Practical implicationsThe implementation detail provided can be easily replicated by other institutions with a global mindset and internationalization goals.Social implicationsThe proliferation of COIL-based experiences will impact how study abroad experiences are defined and offered in the future.Originality/valueWhile researchers have documented COIL experiences in the academic literature, their use during the COVID-19 pandemic, as often the only solution for on-going internationalization, has not been thoroughly studied or documented. In addition, the class activities further used team-based international workplace pedagogy, authentic engagement and technology.
本研究旨在提供一个案例,两所合作院校和商科教师在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间创造性地利用协作式在线国际学习(COIL)经验,向在线学习过渡,使本科商科课程国际化,并利用现有技术提供一个案例研究项目,以进一步培养学生的全球思维。设计/方法/方法研究人员利用一所美国学院和一所秘鲁大学的开放式定性评论,从国际商业课程中提供的基于虚拟线圈的学习体验中发现了关键主题。来自两国学生的课程结束评估评论证实了学习经验的成功以及在虚拟环境中与其他学生和教师一起工作的价值。研究的局限性/意义提供了未来研究的领域,以扩展这些初步的探索性发现。然而,其影响很明显,这种方法也适用于非大流行情况,可以迅速将全球思维带到地球的偏远角落,确保所有学生体验到“虚拟”的海外学习,即使在学生或机构受到旅行限制或预算限制的情况下也是如此。实际意义提供的实现细节可以很容易地被具有全球思维和国际化目标的其他机构复制。社会影响基于coil的留学经历的激增将影响未来留学经历的定义和提供方式。虽然研究人员在学术文献中记录了COIL的经验,但它们在COVID-19大流行期间的使用,通常是正在进行的国际化的唯一解决方案,尚未得到彻底的研究或记录。此外,课堂活动进一步采用了以团队为基础的国际职场教学法、真实参与和技术。
{"title":"Increasing global mindset through collaborative online international learning (COIL): internationalizing the undergraduate international business class","authors":"Fernando Garcia, Stephen Ray Smith, A. Burger, M. Helms","doi":"10.1108/jieb-08-2022-0054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-08-2022-0054","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims to provide a case example of two partner institutions and business faculty who creatively used a collaborative online international learning (COIL) experience during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and transition to online learning to internationalize an undergraduate business class and use existing technology to offer a case study project to further students’ global mindset.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Using open-ended qualitative comments from an American college and a Peruvian university, researchers uncovered key themes from a virtual COIL-based learning experience offered as part of an international business class.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Student end-of-course evaluation comments from both countries validated the success of the learning experience and value of working together with other students and faculty in a virtual setting.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000Areas for future research are provided to extend these initial exploratory findings. However, the implications are clear that the methodology is also appropriate in nonpandemic situations and can quickly bring a global mindset to remote corners of the globe and ensure all students experience the “virtual” study abroad, even when there are travel limitations or budget restrictions for students or the institutions.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The implementation detail provided can be easily replicated by other institutions with a global mindset and internationalization goals.\u0000\u0000\u0000Social implications\u0000The proliferation of COIL-based experiences will impact how study abroad experiences are defined and offered in the future.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000While researchers have documented COIL experiences in the academic literature, their use during the COVID-19 pandemic, as often the only solution for on-going internationalization, has not been thoroughly studied or documented. In addition, the class activities further used team-based international workplace pedagogy, authentic engagement and technology.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73899149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Closing the gender gap in the business classroom: focus on finance 缩小商业课堂上的性别差距:关注金融
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-05-2022-0038
A. Ramírez, J. Lofgren
PurposeFinance is a male-dominated field of work. This study aims to understand if learning in finance follows the same pattern. Furthermore, the authors want to understand if foreign female students are subject to the same cultural norms and sorting mechanisms as their counterparts from the USA or Finland.Design/methodology/approachIn the context of a capstone course, students of two well-known international business programs (one in the USA, the other in Finland) participate in a business simulation. The authors surveyed the students on their learning experience across different business functions. The authors collected 440 responses over five years.FindingsA gender gap exists in learning finance. Females surveyed reported learning less (9%–15%) than males. However, foreign females reported learning more (11%–17%). Additionally, the authors find no gender gap in learning of other business functions (i.e. marketing and strategy). Foreign females seem to bypass traditional roles and sorting mechanisms.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to document the moderating effect of foreignness on the gender gap in learning.
金融是一个男性主导的工作领域。本研究旨在了解金融学习是否遵循相同的模式。此外,作者还想了解外国女学生是否与来自美国或芬兰的女学生一样受到同样的文化规范和分类机制的影响。设计/方法/方法在一个顶点课程的背景下,两个著名的国际商业项目(一个在美国,另一个在芬兰)的学生参加了一个商业模拟。作者调查了学生在不同业务职能部门的学习经历。作者在五年内收集了440份回复。发现在学习金融方面存在性别差异。接受调查的女性表示学习比男性少(9%-15%)。然而,外国女性报告学习更多(11%-17%)。此外,作者发现在学习其他业务功能(即营销和战略)方面没有性别差异。外国女性似乎绕过了传统的角色和分类机制。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究首次记录了外国国籍对学习性别差距的调节作用。
{"title":"Closing the gender gap in the business classroom: focus on finance","authors":"A. Ramírez, J. Lofgren","doi":"10.1108/jieb-05-2022-0038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-05-2022-0038","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Finance is a male-dominated field of work. This study aims to understand if learning in finance follows the same pattern. Furthermore, the authors want to understand if foreign female students are subject to the same cultural norms and sorting mechanisms as their counterparts from the USA or Finland.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000In the context of a capstone course, students of two well-known international business programs (one in the USA, the other in Finland) participate in a business simulation. The authors surveyed the students on their learning experience across different business functions. The authors collected 440 responses over five years.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000A gender gap exists in learning finance. Females surveyed reported learning less (9%–15%) than males. However, foreign females reported learning more (11%–17%). Additionally, the authors find no gender gap in learning of other business functions (i.e. marketing and strategy). Foreign females seem to bypass traditional roles and sorting mechanisms.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to document the moderating effect of foreignness on the gender gap in learning.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83229008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determinants of satisfaction with global virtual teamwork 全球虚拟团队合作满意度的决定因素
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0053
Michael Stoica, Liviu Florea, Akhadian S. Harnowo
PurposeData was obtained from students from 39 universities in 24 countries, part of a large experiential exercise, X-Culture, who worked remotely in cross-cultural teams to solve business problems. The purpose of this study is to develop and test, using structural equation modeling, a conceptual model that identifies the determinants of satisfaction with teamwork.Design/methodology/approachData was obtained from participants, students from universities from 39 universities in 24 countries, in a large experiential exercise, X-Culture, who worked remotely in cross-cultural teams to solve business problems. A conceptual model that identifies determinants of satisfaction with teamwork was developed and tested using structural equation modeling.FindingsSatisfaction with teamwork is related to cultural intelligence (CQ), team identity and team climate. Interestingly, CQ of individual team members does not directly impact satisfaction with teamwork. Team identification and team climate, variables that require personal engagement and goodwill, mediate the effects of CQ on satisfaction.Originality/valueResults suggest that team identification and team climate are important antecedents and explanatory mechanisms for developing satisfaction with teamwork. Having culturally intelligent team members is a necessary, but insufficient condition for satisfying teamwork. Therefore, to increase satisfaction with global virtual teamwork, teams need more than simply culturally intelligent team members. Increased satisfaction requires that team members identify with their team and develop a favorable team climate. The authors suggest education recommendations for global virtual teams.
数据来自24个国家39所大学的学生,这是大型体验练习X-Culture的一部分,他们在跨文化团队中远程工作以解决业务问题。本研究的目的是开发和测试,使用结构方程模型,一个概念模型,确定团队合作满意度的决定因素。设计/方法/方法数据来自参与者,来自24个国家39所大学的学生,在X-Culture的大型体验式练习中,他们在跨文化团队中远程工作以解决业务问题。一个概念模型确定了团队合作满意度的决定因素,并使用结构方程模型进行了测试。团队合作满意度与文化智力(CQ)、团队认同和团队氛围有关。有趣的是,团队成员的文化智商并不直接影响团队满意度。团队认同和团队氛围这两个需要个人投入和善意的变量,在文化商对满意度的影响中起中介作用。研究结果表明,团队认同和团队氛围是团队合作满意度发展的重要前提和解释机制。拥有具有文化智慧的团队成员是满足团队合作的必要条件,但不是充分条件。因此,要提高对全球虚拟团队合作的满意度,团队需要的不仅仅是具有文化智慧的团队成员。提高满意度需要团队成员认同他们的团队,并建立一个良好的团队氛围。作者为全球虚拟团队提出了教育建议。
{"title":"Determinants of satisfaction with global virtual teamwork","authors":"Michael Stoica, Liviu Florea, Akhadian S. Harnowo","doi":"10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0053","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Data was obtained from students from 39 universities in 24 countries, part of a large experiential exercise, X-Culture, who worked remotely in cross-cultural teams to solve business problems. The purpose of this study is to develop and test, using structural equation modeling, a conceptual model that identifies the determinants of satisfaction with teamwork.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Data was obtained from participants, students from universities from 39 universities in 24 countries, in a large experiential exercise, X-Culture, who worked remotely in cross-cultural teams to solve business problems. A conceptual model that identifies determinants of satisfaction with teamwork was developed and tested using structural equation modeling.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Satisfaction with teamwork is related to cultural intelligence (CQ), team identity and team climate. Interestingly, CQ of individual team members does not directly impact satisfaction with teamwork. Team identification and team climate, variables that require personal engagement and goodwill, mediate the effects of CQ on satisfaction.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Results suggest that team identification and team climate are important antecedents and explanatory mechanisms for developing satisfaction with teamwork. Having culturally intelligent team members is a necessary, but insufficient condition for satisfying teamwork. Therefore, to increase satisfaction with global virtual teamwork, teams need more than simply culturally intelligent team members. Increased satisfaction requires that team members identify with their team and develop a favorable team climate. The authors suggest education recommendations for global virtual teams.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86749098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Understanding faculty acceptance of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Saudi Arabian case study 了解COVID-19大流行期间教师对在线教学的接受程度:以沙特阿拉伯为例
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-12-2021-0109
Haider H. Madani, Ajay Adhikari, Christopher D. Hodgdon
PurposeThis study aims to leverage the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework developed by Venkatesh et al. (2003) to explore the factors influencing faculty willingness and acceptance of online teaching at a major Saudi Arabian university as we move to a post-COVID-19 new normal.Design/methodology/approachWe surveyed business school faculty from a major Saudi Arabian university that transitioned to online learning because of the COVID-19 lockdown. We used partial least square structural equation modeling to examine the factors that impact faculty satisfaction and behavioral intention to continue using online teaching in the future.FindingsThe results of the study indicated that when faculty perceive that e-learning improves their teaching performance and effectiveness (performance expectancy) and find that online teaching tools are relatively easy to use (effort expectancy), then they are more open to considering online teaching and using digital tools even after the pandemic.Research limitations/implicationsThe study uses a Saudi Arabian sample, so the results of the study may not be generalizable to other countries. The study was cross-sectional in nature; a longitudinal design would help in uncovering more stable relationships and enabling us to draw stronger conclusions. Lastly, the sample size for the study was relatively small, resulting in a loss of power in statistical testing. Notwithstanding these limitations, our study contributes to a greater understanding and appreciation of faculty acceptance of online teaching as we progress to a post-COVID-19 new normal. As such, it should be useful to educators, institutions and policymakers as they seek to reimagine business education going forward.Originality/valueThe present study is one of the first scholarly studies to focus on exploring e-learning acceptance in a business school from a faculty perspective, considering the natural experiment that forced institutions to move to online teaching irrespective of their prior acceptance or experience with this teaching modality.
本研究旨在利用Venkatesh等人(2003)开发的技术接受和使用统一理论框架,探索在沙特阿拉伯一所主要大学进入后covid -19新常态时,影响教师在线教学意愿和接受程度的因素。设计/方法/方法我们调查了沙特阿拉伯一所主要大学的商学院教师,该大学因COVID-19封锁而转向在线学习。我们使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型来研究影响教师满意度和未来继续使用在线教学的行为意愿的因素。研究结果表明,当教师认为电子学习提高了他们的教学绩效和有效性(绩效预期),并发现在线教学工具相对容易使用(努力预期)时,他们就更愿意考虑在线教学和使用数字工具,即使在疫情之后也是如此。研究的局限性/意义:该研究使用了沙特阿拉伯的样本,因此研究结果可能无法推广到其他国家。这项研究本质上是横断面的;纵向设计将有助于揭示更稳定的关系,使我们能够得出更有力的结论。最后,本研究的样本量相对较小,导致统计检验的有效性下降。尽管存在这些限制,但随着我们进入后covid -19新常态,我们的研究有助于更好地理解和欣赏教师对在线教学的接受程度。因此,在教育工作者、机构和政策制定者寻求重新构想未来的商业教育时,它应该是有用的。本研究是第一批从教师角度探讨商学院对电子学习接受程度的学术研究之一,考虑到迫使机构转向在线教学的自然实验,而不管它们之前是否接受或有过这种教学模式的经验。
{"title":"Understanding faculty acceptance of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Saudi Arabian case study","authors":"Haider H. Madani, Ajay Adhikari, Christopher D. Hodgdon","doi":"10.1108/jieb-12-2021-0109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-12-2021-0109","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims to leverage the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework developed by Venkatesh et al. (2003) to explore the factors influencing faculty willingness and acceptance of online teaching at a major Saudi Arabian university as we move to a post-COVID-19 new normal.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000We surveyed business school faculty from a major Saudi Arabian university that transitioned to online learning because of the COVID-19 lockdown. We used partial least square structural equation modeling to examine the factors that impact faculty satisfaction and behavioral intention to continue using online teaching in the future.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results of the study indicated that when faculty perceive that e-learning improves their teaching performance and effectiveness (performance expectancy) and find that online teaching tools are relatively easy to use (effort expectancy), then they are more open to considering online teaching and using digital tools even after the pandemic.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The study uses a Saudi Arabian sample, so the results of the study may not be generalizable to other countries. The study was cross-sectional in nature; a longitudinal design would help in uncovering more stable relationships and enabling us to draw stronger conclusions. Lastly, the sample size for the study was relatively small, resulting in a loss of power in statistical testing. Notwithstanding these limitations, our study contributes to a greater understanding and appreciation of faculty acceptance of online teaching as we progress to a post-COVID-19 new normal. As such, it should be useful to educators, institutions and policymakers as they seek to reimagine business education going forward.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The present study is one of the first scholarly studies to focus on exploring e-learning acceptance in a business school from a faculty perspective, considering the natural experiment that forced institutions to move to online teaching irrespective of their prior acceptance or experience with this teaching modality.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76072185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A comparison of graduate university perspectives of online versus face-to-face during the pandemic 大流行期间研究生在线教育与面对面教育的比较
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049
Lynn A. Fish, C. R. Snodgrass, Ji-Hee Kim
PurposeThis study aims to compare graduate student perspectives of online versus face-to-face (FTF) education during the pandemic at two different universities. One university, the “International University”, was physically located in Korea but served an international base of students, and the other was a Jesuit, Catholic University in the USA.Design/methodology/approachAn online Qualtrics survey was used to gather student perceptions on a five-point Likert scale on individual and program factors. Chi-square analysis using the contingency coefficient as the nominal value was performed to uncover significant differences.FindingsSignificant differences between the two groups existed on motivation, discipline, self-directed, independence, cost investment, preference, happiness, difficulty, student-to-student interaction and student-to-instructor interaction. This research has implications for instructors and administrators in identifying shortcomings and highlighting the uniqueness of different practices around the world.Originality/valuePrevious studies on student perceptions have been performed. However, this study is original in the fact that it directly compares two different graduate student populations perspectives of online versus FTF during the pandemic.
目的:本研究旨在比较两所不同大学的研究生在大流行期间对在线教育和面对面教育的看法。一所大学,“国际大学”,位于韩国,但为国际学生提供服务,另一所大学是美国的耶稣会天主教大学。设计/方法/方法一项在线质量调查用于收集学生对个人和项目因素的五点李克特量表的看法。使用权变系数作为标称值进行卡方分析以发现显著差异。两组在动机、纪律、自主、独立性、成本投入、偏好、快乐、难度、学生与学生互动、学生与教师互动等方面存在显著差异。这项研究对教师和管理人员在识别缺点和突出世界各地不同实践的独特性方面具有启示意义。原创性/价值先前已经对学生的认知进行了研究。然而,这项研究的原创性在于,它直接比较了大流行期间两种不同的研究生群体对在线和FTF的看法。
{"title":"A comparison of graduate university perspectives of online versus face-to-face during the pandemic","authors":"Lynn A. Fish, C. R. Snodgrass, Ji-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims to compare graduate student perspectives of online versus face-to-face (FTF) education during the pandemic at two different universities. One university, the “International University”, was physically located in Korea but served an international base of students, and the other was a Jesuit, Catholic University in the USA.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000An online Qualtrics survey was used to gather student perceptions on a five-point Likert scale on individual and program factors. Chi-square analysis using the contingency coefficient as the nominal value was performed to uncover significant differences.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Significant differences between the two groups existed on motivation, discipline, self-directed, independence, cost investment, preference, happiness, difficulty, student-to-student interaction and student-to-instructor interaction. This research has implications for instructors and administrators in identifying shortcomings and highlighting the uniqueness of different practices around the world.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Previous studies on student perceptions have been performed. However, this study is original in the fact that it directly compares two different graduate student populations perspectives of online versus FTF during the pandemic.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84281739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Digital serious game to engage business students in active lectures: a pilot study 利用数字严肃游戏吸引商学院学生积极听课:一项试点研究
IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI: 10.1108/jieb-04-2022-0025
Tobias Endress, Anton Pussep, Markus Schief
PurposeThis study aims to investigate an integrated approach that stimulates engagement and interaction in the online learning environment. A simulation game was developed to support the specific learning objectives (LOs) of the lecture and give students the opportunity to apply relevant practical skills (management and group decision-making). The simulation is designed to engage students, facilitate group work in teams and actively apply the knowledge from the lectures.Design/methodology/approachQualitative research methods and a pilot version of the simulation game in an actual classroom setting were used. The primary LO was to apply decision-making in groups and experience the consequences of decisions on business success. The students were assigned randomly to five groups representing different competing companies.FindingsThis study revealed that a simulation game with a reduced scope can facilitate interaction and participation in online lectures. It demonstrated that it is possible to obtain the main benefits of simulation-based learning with a simple game that consists of few decision variables and requires minimal training.Research limitations/implicationsThere are limitations to this pilot study, some of which need to be address in future research. One limitation is the small number of participants (21). Another limitation is that all participants were from a class at an Asian university. While adding to existing research that focused primarily on Anglo-America and Europe, this study’s approach should be evaluated with more subjects from varying cultural backgrounds to validate the findings. The evaluation could be improved with more participants but also additional questions to measure how and why this study’s approach benefits learning success. E.g. it should be explored what component of decision-making or group learning was most significant. With this, it would also be interesting to explore incremental learning and learning across groups along the study duration.Practical implicationsThe simulation game can be used in business education. Students enjoyed the interaction with their peers and the instructor. The students stated that it was a good learning experience for them and they made good learning progress.Originality/valueThe prototype demonstrated the general feasibility and the smooth handling of the practical application and integration in online lectures. The aim to develop a serious simulation game for online classes was achieved. It was possible to obtain the main benefits of simulation-based learning with a simple game that consists of few decision variables and therefore requires minimal training and time.
目的本研究旨在探讨一种促进在线学习环境中参与和互动的综合方法。为配合讲座的具体学习目标,我们设计了一个模拟游戏,让学生有机会运用相关的实践技能(管理和小组决策)。模拟的目的是让学生参与进来,促进团队合作,并积极应用讲座中的知识。设计/方法论/方法定性研究方法和模拟游戏的试点版本在实际课堂环境中使用。主要的LO是在团队中应用决策,并体验决策对商业成功的影响。学生们被随机分为五组,代表不同的竞争公司。研究结果表明,缩小范围的模拟游戏可以促进在线课程的互动和参与。它证明了可以通过一个简单的游戏获得基于模拟的学习的主要好处,这个游戏由很少的决策变量组成,需要最少的训练。研究局限性/启示本初步研究存在局限性,其中一些需要在未来的研究中加以解决。一个限制是参与者数量少(21人)。另一个限制是,所有参与者都来自亚洲大学的一个班级。虽然现有的研究主要集中在英美和欧洲,但这项研究的方法应该得到更多来自不同文化背景的研究对象的评估,以验证研究结果。有了更多的参与者,评估可以得到改进,但也会有额外的问题来衡量这项研究的方法如何以及为什么有利于学习成功。例如,应该探索决策或小组学习的哪个组成部分最重要。有了这个,在研究期间探索增量学习和跨小组学习也会很有趣。实际意义模拟游戏可用于商业教育。学生们很享受与同学和老师的互动。学生们表示,这对他们来说是一次很好的学习经历,他们在学习上取得了很好的进步。原创性/价值该原型演示了在网络讲座中实际应用和集成的总体可行性和处理的流畅性。为在线课堂开发一款严肃的模拟游戏的目标实现了。我们可以通过一个包含少量决策变量的简单游戏获得基于模拟的学习的主要好处,因此只需要最少的训练和时间。
{"title":"Digital serious game to engage business students in active lectures: a pilot study","authors":"Tobias Endress, Anton Pussep, Markus Schief","doi":"10.1108/jieb-04-2022-0025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-04-2022-0025","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims to investigate an integrated approach that stimulates engagement and interaction in the online learning environment. A simulation game was developed to support the specific learning objectives (LOs) of the lecture and give students the opportunity to apply relevant practical skills (management and group decision-making). The simulation is designed to engage students, facilitate group work in teams and actively apply the knowledge from the lectures.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Qualitative research methods and a pilot version of the simulation game in an actual classroom setting were used. The primary LO was to apply decision-making in groups and experience the consequences of decisions on business success. The students were assigned randomly to five groups representing different competing companies.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This study revealed that a simulation game with a reduced scope can facilitate interaction and participation in online lectures. It demonstrated that it is possible to obtain the main benefits of simulation-based learning with a simple game that consists of few decision variables and requires minimal training.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000There are limitations to this pilot study, some of which need to be address in future research. One limitation is the small number of participants (21). Another limitation is that all participants were from a class at an Asian university. While adding to existing research that focused primarily on Anglo-America and Europe, this study’s approach should be evaluated with more subjects from varying cultural backgrounds to validate the findings. The evaluation could be improved with more participants but also additional questions to measure how and why this study’s approach benefits learning success. E.g. it should be explored what component of decision-making or group learning was most significant. With this, it would also be interesting to explore incremental learning and learning across groups along the study duration.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The simulation game can be used in business education. Students enjoyed the interaction with their peers and the instructor. The students stated that it was a good learning experience for them and they made good learning progress.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The prototype demonstrated the general feasibility and the smooth handling of the practical application and integration in online lectures. The aim to develop a serious simulation game for online classes was achieved. It was possible to obtain the main benefits of simulation-based learning with a simple game that consists of few decision variables and therefore requires minimal training and time.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87215243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1