Audiology Research最新文献

Background/Objectives: Spanish-speaking patients face persistent barriers in accessing equitable audiological care, particularly when standardized language-appropriate tools are lacking. Two Spanish-language sentence recognition tests, the Spanish AzBio Sentence (SAzB) and the Latin American Hearing in Noise Test (LAH), are commonly used to evaluate speech perception in adults with hearing loss. However, performance differences between these measures may influence referral decisions for hearing intervention, such as cochlear implantation. This study compared test performance under varying noise and spatial conditions to guide appropriate test selection and reduce the risk of misclassification that may contribute to healthcare disparities. Methods: Twenty-one bilingual Spanish/English speaking adults with normal bilateral hearing completed speech perception testing using both the SAzB and LAH. Testing was conducted under two spatial configurations: (1) speech and noise presented from the front (0° azimuth) and (2) speech to the simulated poorer ear and noise to the better ear (90°/270° azimuth). Conditions included quiet and three signal-to-noise ratios (+10, +5, and 0 dB). Analyses included paired t-tests and one-way ANOVAs. Results: Participants scored significantly higher on the LAH than on the SAzB across all SNR conditions and configurations, with ceiling effects observed for the LAH. SAzB scores varied by language dominance, while LAH scores did not. No other differences were observed based on any further demographic information. Conclusions: The SAzB provides a more challenging and informative assessment of speech perception in noise. Relying on easier tests like the LAH may obscure real-world difficulties and delay appropriate referrals for hearing loss intervention, including cochlear implant evaluation. Selecting the most appropriate test is critical to avoiding under-referral and ensuring Spanish-speaking patients receive equitable and accurate care.

Background/Objectives: Skull vibration-induced nystagmus (SVIN) is a rapid bedside test that reveals vestibular asymmetry. Its clinical utility in Ménière's disease (MD) remains controversial, particularly regarding its association with radiological endolymphatic hydrops (EH). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between SVIN, audiovestibular parameters, and EH severity in patients with unilateral definite MD. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary academic referral center and included patients with unilateral MD who underwent SVIN testing (SVT), audiovestibular evaluation (PTA, cVEMP, oVEMP, vHIT, and caloric testing), and 3T MRI with gadolinium-enhanced 3D-FLAIR sequences to quantify EH. Results: In total, 84 patients were included in the study. SVIN was present in 57.14% of patients (n = 48), with ipsilesional nystagmus being the most frequent subtype (64.58%). Patients with SVIN had significantly higher vestibular EH (p = 0.017) and vestibular endolymphatic ratio (REL) in the affected ear (p = 0.019). Disease duration (p = 0.026) and shorter time since last vertigo spell (p = 0.018) were also associated with SVIN presence. REL correlated moderately with disease duration (r = 0.390, p < 0.001), PTA (r = 0.576, p < 0.001), and number of vertigo spells (r = 0.236, p = 0.031), but not with time since last crisis (r = -0.127, p = 0.252). ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.735 for REL in predicting SVIN. Conclusions: SVIN correlates with the severity of vestibular EH. This finding indicates a stimulus-locked response of a vestibular asymmetry rather than a purely structural alteration.

Purpose: The present study aimed to describe the adaptation and validation process of the MuRQoL (Music Related Quality of Life questionnaire) from English to Hebrew and to describe normative data from a cohort of adults with normal hearing versus those with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Methods: After thoroughly translating and adapting to Hebrew, the participants completed the questionnaire online. We calculated the Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega scores for all scales and subscales. The construct validity of the questionnaire was evaluated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the "known group" method. A total of 310 adults participated in this study. Fifty-four participants were deaf or hard of hearing, and 256 had normal hearing. Results: Internal consistency of the MuRQoL-He scales and subscales demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability. The goodness-of-fit indices for the frequency and importance scales were within acceptable standards. We found a significant difference in the frequency scale, where the normal-hearing group scores were significantly higher than those of the deaf and hard-of-hearing groups. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the MuRQoL-He have been confirmed, indicating that it is suitable for guiding music rehabilitation for Hebrew-speaking deaf and hard-of-hearing adults.

Background and Clinical Significance: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) most commonly involves the posterior semicircular canal (PSC), whereas anterior semicircular canal BPPV (ASC-BPPV) is rare, accounting for only 1-3% of cases. Most ASC-BPPV cases respond well to particle repositioning maneuvers (PRMs), with refractory presentations being exceptional and diagnostically challenging, particularly when differential diagnoses such as apogeotropic posterior semicircular canal BPPV (PSC-BPPV) or central causes must be excluded. Case Presentation: A 43-year-old woman presented with vertigo triggered by head extension and rolling in bed. Initial neurological and otoneurological examinations were unremarkable. During the left Dix-Hallpike maneuver, a vertical down-beating nystagmus with subtle leftward torsion appeared after a 5 s latency and lasted 15 s. The supine head-hanging maneuver provoked a stronger and longer 30 s response, while the right Dix-Hallpike was negative. Despite repeated PRMs, including Yacovino (Deep Head-hanging), reverse Epley, Epley, and modified Semont maneuvers, the patient remained symptomatic over three years. Intermittently, conversion to PSC-BPPV was suspected, and temporary resolution was achieved after left-sided Epley and Semont maneuvers, but recurrence followed. Treatment with a mechanical rotational chair (TRV) initially resolved symptoms, but vertigo recurred several months later following two syncopal episodes with minor trauma. Extensive neurological evaluation, including MRI, CT, EEG, and vascular ultrasound, excluded central causes. Conclusions: This case illustrates the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties posed by refractory ASC-BPPV, particularly in differentiating it from apogeotropic PSC-BPPV and central etiologies. It underscores the importance of latency, torsional characteristics, and supine head-hanging testing in diagnosis and demonstrates the potential role of mechanical rotational chairs in management. Personalized approaches incorporating anatomical imaging and maneuver adaptation are essential in such complex cases.

Background: Hearing and cognition decline with age. Hearing is now considered an independent risk factor for later cognitive impairment. Computerized cognitive auditory training is being discussed as a possible adjunctive therapy approach. Objectives: The aim of this exploratory study is to investigate how the success of a computer-based cognitive auditory training (CCAT) can be measured. For this purpose, the influence of a CCAT on different dimensions of hearing and cognition was determined. Materials and Methods: 23 subjects between 52 and 77 years old were recruited with normacusis to moderate hearing loss. They underwent 40 digital training lessons at home. Before, during, and after completion, concentration ability with the d2-R, memory (VLMT), subjective hearing impairment (HHI), hearing quality (SSQ12), listening effort in noise (ACALES), and speech understanding in noise (GÖSA) were measured. Results and Discussion: In this uncontrolled, non-randomized study, one of the main findings was that cognitive dimensions, namely processing speed, improved by 12.11 ± 16.40 points (p = 0.006), and concentration performance improved by 12.56 ± 13.50 points (p = 0.001), which were not directly trained in CCAT. Learning performance also improved slightly by 4.00 ± 7.00 (p = 0.019). Subjective hearing handicap significantly reduced by 10.70 ± 12.38 (p = 0.001). There were no significant changes in the SSQ-12 (p = 0.979). Hearing effort improved by 1.79 ± 2.13 dB SPL (p = 0.001), 1.75 ± 2.09 (p = 0.001), and 3.32 ± 3.27 dB (p < 0.001), respectively. Speech understanding in noise did not improve significantly. CCAT is likely to improve several dimensions of hearing and cognition. Controlled future studies are needed to investigate its efficacy.

Background/Objectives: A.BA.CO. is a speech-to-text captioning system developed for school classrooms. The system uses remote microphones to capture the teacher's speech without background noise. Under this setup, an issue of signal latency arises for students wearing hearing aids (HAs) or cochlear implants (CIs), whose latency is different from that of the remote microphones and may require the development of a temporal coupling solution. This study establishes the foundation for such a solution by determining the latency of two RMs (Remote Microphones) compatible with both HA and CI systems. The frequency response of the systems is analyzed independently and combined. Methods: The RMs combined with two Behind-The-Ear HAs, for which transparency was verified, were tested with two different compression ratios in a laboratory specializing in electroacoustic measurements using the comparison method to assess performance. Results: The time measurements revealed that the RMs differ by 10-12 ms (23-24 ms and 33-35 ms) and that the two HAs have time delays that differ by 1-2 ms (6-7 ms and 5-7 ms). The frequency responses showed that when HA and RM have similar gains, they exhibit comb-filter distortions. This effect could alter the acoustic output of devices in the ear canal and vary according to the mix ratio and mutual positions of HA and RM, potentially necessitating greater commitment from the wearer. Conclusions: The communication system will have to foresee different delays based on the model and brand of RM because similar transmission systems do not have the same time delays. RMs were originally designed for HA and are most effective if they represent the only or major acoustic stimulation that reaches the eardrum. These limits must be considered when estimating the effectiveness of A.BA.CO. with RM.

Background/Objectives: Although research has demonstrated the positive impacts of hearing aid (HA) digital noise reduction (DNR), limited research is available on the impacts of the strength of DNR on listening effort. This study evaluated the effects of changes in the strength of HA DNR on listening effort, measured, behaviorally, using a self-report rating scale, and, physiologically, using pupillometry. The agreement between both measures was also examined. Methods: Eleven young adults with normal hearing completed a sentence-in-noise recognition task. Stimuli were processed through four noise reduction conditions (off, minimum, medium, maximum) using DNR algorithms found in conventional digital HAs. After sentence presentation, participants subjectively rated their perceived listening effort. Pupillometry was recorded during the task to assess changes in pupil size (a proxy of listening effort) during sentence recognition. Results: Participants' perceived listening effort reduced as the noise reduction strength increased from off to medium DNR and then plateaued for the maximum DNR condition. Pupil dilation increased from off to medium DNR and then reduced for the maximum condition. Correlation analyses suggested no agreement between self-report and pupillometry measures of listening effort. Conclusions: Both self-report and pupillometry measures demonstrated changes in listening effort, with changes in the DNR strength indicating that noise reduction systems do provide benefit in reducing listening effort to a certain extent. Lack of agreement between the measures suggests that both methods might be assessing different constructs of listening effort and care should be taken while making methodological decisions to assess listening effort in individuals wearing HAs.

Background/Objectives: The primary objective of the present study was to investigate early global development in children after one year of cochlear implant (CI) use. The secondary objective was to investigate the role of variables such as age at CI activation, gender, and parental schooling in early global development in children with a CI. Methods: The study sample included 24 subjects. All children were affected by severe-to-profound congenital bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (HL). The HL was diagnosed between 1 and 23 months of age (median 3 months) and participants underwent cochlear implant activation at 9-25 months (median 14 months). Participants were evaluated before CI surgery and after one year of CI use using the Italian version of the Griffiths III scales. Results: The general developmental quotient remained stable, as did the developmental quotients on scales A, C, D, and E. However, the development quotients on scale B, corresponding to the domain of "language and communication," underwent a significant increase (p value < 0.05). There was a statistically significant negative effect of "age at CI activation" on both DQ at scale B (t - 3.457) and GDQ (t - 42.069). Maternal schooling had a significant positive effect on GDQ and DQ for scales A to D (p. value < 0.05). Conclusions: After one year of CI use, a significant improvement in the early global development of children was found in the language and communication domain. The age at CI activation and the level of the mother's education were found to be related to early global development.

Parenting stress significantly affects caregivers of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children, influenced by unique challenges and stressors. Background/Objectives: This study aims to develop the Chinese Family Stress Scale (CFSS) and to identify the stressors and contributing factors to elevated stress levels. Methods: The study involved 257 caregivers of DHH children aged 0-12 years old. The CFSS was used to assess parenting stress in caregivers of DHH children, with its reliability and validity evaluated. Factors such as speech intelligibility, oral language use, self-compassion, and social support were examined for their impact on parenting stress. Results: Key stressors included financial issues, discipline, education concerns, medical care, and safety. Elevated parenting stress was significantly associated with poor speech intelligibility of the child, inadequate oral language use, negative aspects of self-compassion, and insufficient social support. The CFSS showed good reliability and validity in measuring parenting stress among caregivers of DHH children. Conclusions: The CFSS is an effective tool for assessing parenting stress in caregivers of DHH children. Interventions to reduce parenting stress can focus on improving children's communication skills, enhancing caregiver self-compassion, and bolstering social support networks.

Background: Children diagnosed with Speech Sound Disorders (SSDs) encounter difficulties in speech perception, especially when listening in the presence of background noise. Recommended protocols for auditory processing evaluation include behavioral linguistic and speech processing tests, as well as objective electrophysiological measures. The present study compared the auditory processing profiles of children with SSD and typically developing (TD) children using a battery of behavioral language and auditory tests combined with auditory evoked responses. Methods: Forty (40) parents of 7-10 years old Greek Cypriot children completed parent questionnaires related to their children's listening; their children completed an assessment comprising language, phonology, auditory processing, and auditory evoked responses. The experimental group included 24 children with a history of SSDs; the control group consisted of 16 TD children. Results: Three factors significantly differentiated SSD from TD children: Factor 1 (auditory processing screening), Factor 5 (phonological awareness), and Factor 13 (Auditory Brainstem Response-ABR wave V latency). Among these, Factor 1 consistently predicted SSD classification both independently and in combined models, indicating strong ecological and diagnostic relevance. This predictive power suggests real-world listening behaviors are central to SSD differentiation. The significant correlation between Factor 5 and Factor 13 may suggest an interaction between auditory processing at the brainstem level and higher-order phonological manipulation. Conclusions: This research underscores the diagnostic significance of integrating behavioral and physiological metrics through dimensional and predictive methodologies. Factor 1, which focuses on authentic listening environments, was identified as the strongest predictor. These results advocate for the inclusion of ecologically valid listening items in the screening for APD. Poor discrimination of speech in noise imposes discrepancies between incoming auditory information and retained phonological representations, which disrupts the implicit processing mechanisms that align auditory input with phonological representations stored in memory. Speech and language pathologists can incorporate pertinent auditory processing assessment findings to identify potential language-processing challenges and formulate more effective therapeutic intervention strategies.