Pub Date : 2025-08-06DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040099
Josip Novaković, Ana Barišić, Erik Šuvak, Emili Dragaš, Petar Drviš, Tihana Mendeš, Jakov Ajduk, Siniša Maslovara, Andro Košec
Background: Meniere's disease is characterized by a triad of vertigo episodes, fluctuating hearing loss, and tinnitus. The disease is followed by a loss of quality of life in patients, with the severity depending on the individual and the stage of the disease. Since there are no quantitatively validated tests that connect all elements of the disease, the only source of subjective data that can be analyzed is the disease diary and questionnaires, among which the MDPOSI (Meniere's Disease Patient-Oriented Symptom-Severity Index) stands out as a designated quality-of-life assessment tool. This study aims to evaluate the differences in the questionnaire depending on the clinical characteristics of the disease. Methods: The study recruited 60 patients, with clinical variables including age, gender, disease laterality, caloric testing results, and PTA results, the presence of spontaneous nystagmus, pathological values of calorimetric testing, or rotatory chair testing abnormalities. Results: The appearance of spontaneous nystagmus showed a significant association with worse hearing threshold values at 500 Hz (p = 0.036, OR 4.416) and higher. Worse SRT scores correlated with Q1 (p = 0.011), Q2 (p = 0.028), Q4 (p = 0.045), Q5 (p = 0.013), and the total MDPOSI score (p = 0.008, 0.339). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher total value of the MDPOSI questionnaire was statistically significantly associated with older age (p = 0.042) and spontaneous nystagmus (p = 0.037). Conclusions: There is a correlation between the clinical characteristics of Meniere's disease and the MDPOSI questionnaire, making it useful for assessing quality of life and disease progression.
{"title":"Correlation of Clinical Characteristics of Meniere's Disease and Its Patient-Oriented Severity Index (MD POSI).","authors":"Josip Novaković, Ana Barišić, Erik Šuvak, Emili Dragaš, Petar Drviš, Tihana Mendeš, Jakov Ajduk, Siniša Maslovara, Andro Košec","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040099","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Meniere's disease is characterized by a triad of vertigo episodes, fluctuating hearing loss, and tinnitus. The disease is followed by a loss of quality of life in patients, with the severity depending on the individual and the stage of the disease. Since there are no quantitatively validated tests that connect all elements of the disease, the only source of subjective data that can be analyzed is the disease diary and questionnaires, among which the MDPOSI (Meniere's Disease Patient-Oriented Symptom-Severity Index) stands out as a designated quality-of-life assessment tool. This study aims to evaluate the differences in the questionnaire depending on the clinical characteristics of the disease. <b>Methods</b>: The study recruited 60 patients, with clinical variables including age, gender, disease laterality, caloric testing results, and PTA results, the presence of spontaneous nystagmus, pathological values of calorimetric testing, or rotatory chair testing abnormalities. <b>Results</b>: The appearance of spontaneous nystagmus showed a significant association with worse hearing threshold values at 500 Hz (<i>p</i> = 0.036, OR 4.416) and higher. Worse SRT scores correlated with Q1 (<i>p</i> = 0.011), Q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.028), Q4 (<i>p</i> = 0.045), Q5 (<i>p</i> = 0.013), and the total MDPOSI score (<i>p</i> = 0.008, 0.339). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher total value of the MDPOSI questionnaire was statistically significantly associated with older age (<i>p</i> = 0.042) and spontaneous nystagmus (<i>p</i> = 0.037). <b>Conclusions</b>: There is a correlation between the clinical characteristics of Meniere's disease and the MDPOSI questionnaire, making it useful for assessing quality of life and disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-06DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040098
Giorgos Sideris, Leonidas Katsis, Styliani Karle, George Korres
Objectives: Lermoyez syndrome (LS) is a rare variant of endolymphatic hydrops with a unique clinical presentation characterized by reversible sensorineural hearing loss preceding vertigo. This review aims to synthesize available literature on LS to clarify its clinical characteristics, diagnostic approach, management strategies, and outcomes, and to highlight the distinguishing features from Menière's disease (MD). Methods: A systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted from 1919 to 2025. The extracted data included demographics, symptom profiles, audiovestibular testing, imaging findings, treatment approaches, and patient outcomes. Results: A total of 23 studies were identified, reporting 53 individual cases of LS. Patients ranged from 27 to 85 years of age, with a mean age of 50.34 years and a male predominance (64.1%). The hallmark of LS across cases was a reproducible clinical pattern of unilateral low-frequency hearing loss followed by vertigo and subsequent auditory recovery. Audiometry typically confirmed reversible sensorineural hearing loss, while vestibular tests and imaging were often unremarkable, primarily used to exclude alternative diagnoses. Treatment approaches varied and were often based on MD protocols, including dietary modifications, vasodilators, diuretics, and vestibular suppressants. Prognosis was generally favorable, with most patients experiencing both hearing recovery and symptom resolution. Conclusions: LS remains a clinically distinct but underrecognized inner ear disorder. Its defining feature-the paradoxical improvement in hearing after vertigo-distinguishes it from Menière's disease and should prompt clinicians to consider LS in differential diagnosis. Due to the rarity of LS and the lack of standardized guidelines, diagnosis and treatment rely on careful clinical assessment and individualized management strategies.
{"title":"Lermoyez Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Reported Cases.","authors":"Giorgos Sideris, Leonidas Katsis, Styliani Karle, George Korres","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040098","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040098","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Lermoyez syndrome (LS) is a rare variant of endolymphatic hydrops with a unique clinical presentation characterized by reversible sensorineural hearing loss preceding vertigo. This review aims to synthesize available literature on LS to clarify its clinical characteristics, diagnostic approach, management strategies, and outcomes, and to highlight the distinguishing features from Menière's disease (MD). <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted from 1919 to 2025. The extracted data included demographics, symptom profiles, audiovestibular testing, imaging findings, treatment approaches, and patient outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 23 studies were identified, reporting 53 individual cases of LS. Patients ranged from 27 to 85 years of age, with a mean age of 50.34 years and a male predominance (64.1%). The hallmark of LS across cases was a reproducible clinical pattern of unilateral low-frequency hearing loss followed by vertigo and subsequent auditory recovery. Audiometry typically confirmed reversible sensorineural hearing loss, while vestibular tests and imaging were often unremarkable, primarily used to exclude alternative diagnoses. Treatment approaches varied and were often based on MD protocols, including dietary modifications, vasodilators, diuretics, and vestibular suppressants. Prognosis was generally favorable, with most patients experiencing both hearing recovery and symptom resolution. <b>Conclusions:</b> LS remains a clinically distinct but underrecognized inner ear disorder. Its defining feature-the paradoxical improvement in hearing after vertigo-distinguishes it from Menière's disease and should prompt clinicians to consider LS in differential diagnosis. Due to the rarity of LS and the lack of standardized guidelines, diagnosis and treatment rely on careful clinical assessment and individualized management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040096
Ava Raynor, Sara Perez, Megan Worthington, Valeriy Shafiro
Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) in pediatric patients with cochlear nerve deficiencies (CND) remains controversial due to a highly variable clinical population, lack of evidence-based guidelines, and mixed research findings. This study assessed current clinical perspectives and practices regarding CI candidacy in children with CND among hearing healthcare professionals in the USA. Methods: An anonymous 19-question online survey was distributed to CI clinicians nationwide. The survey assessed professional background, experience with aplasia and hypoplasia, and perspectives on CI versus auditory brainstem implant (ABI) candidacy, including imaging practices and outcome expectations. Both multiple-choice and open-ended responses were analyzed to identify trends and reasoning. Results: Seventy-two responses were analyzed. Most clinicians supported CI for hypoplasia (60.2%) and, to a lesser extent, for aplasia (41.7%), with audiologists more likely than neurotologists to favor CI. Respondents cited lower risk, accessibility, and the potential for benefit as reasons to attempt CI before ABI. However, many emphasized a case-by-case approach, incorporating imaging, electrophysiological testing, and family counseling. Only 22.2% considered structural factors the best predictors of CI success. Conclusions: Overall, hearing health professionals in the USA tend to favor CI as a first-line option, while acknowledging the limitations of current diagnostic tools and the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making in CI candidacy for children with CND. Findings reveal a high variability in clinical perspectives on CI implantation for pediatric aplasia and hypoplasia and a lack of clinical consensus, highlighting the need for more standardized assessment and imaging protocols to provide greater consistency across centers and enable the development of evidence-based guidelines.
{"title":"Clinical Perspectives on Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Patients with Cochlear Nerve Aplasia or Hypoplasia.","authors":"Ava Raynor, Sara Perez, Megan Worthington, Valeriy Shafiro","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040096","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Cochlear implantation (CI) in pediatric patients with cochlear nerve deficiencies (CND) remains controversial due to a highly variable clinical population, lack of evidence-based guidelines, and mixed research findings. This study assessed current clinical perspectives and practices regarding CI candidacy in children with CND among hearing healthcare professionals in the USA. <b>Methods</b>: An anonymous 19-question online survey was distributed to CI clinicians nationwide. The survey assessed professional background, experience with aplasia and hypoplasia, and perspectives on CI versus auditory brainstem implant (ABI) candidacy, including imaging practices and outcome expectations. Both multiple-choice and open-ended responses were analyzed to identify trends and reasoning. <b>Results</b>: Seventy-two responses were analyzed. Most clinicians supported CI for hypoplasia (60.2%) and, to a lesser extent, for aplasia (41.7%), with audiologists more likely than neurotologists to favor CI. Respondents cited lower risk, accessibility, and the potential for benefit as reasons to attempt CI before ABI. However, many emphasized a case-by-case approach, incorporating imaging, electrophysiological testing, and family counseling. Only 22.2% considered structural factors the best predictors of CI success. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, hearing health professionals in the USA tend to favor CI as a first-line option, while acknowledging the limitations of current diagnostic tools and the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making in CI candidacy for children with CND. Findings reveal a high variability in clinical perspectives on CI implantation for pediatric aplasia and hypoplasia and a lack of clinical consensus, highlighting the need for more standardized assessment and imaging protocols to provide greater consistency across centers and enable the development of evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382941/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the optimal sound presentation level for sound localization testing to assess the effect of hearing interventions in individuals with unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL). Methods: Nine participants with normal hearing were tested, and simulated two-stage UCHL was created using earmuffs and earplugs. We created two types of masking conditions: (1) only an earplug inserted, and (2) an earplug inserted with an earmuff worn. A sound localization test was performed for each condition. The sound presentation levels were 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 dB SPL, and the results were evaluated using root mean square and d-values. Results: Both values showed little difference in masking Condition 2, regardless of the sound presentation level, whereas in masking Condition 1, the values were at their minimum at 55 dB SPL. In addition, comparing the differences between masking Conditions 1 and 2 for each sound presentation level, the greatest difference was observed at 55 dB SPL for both values. Conclusions: The optimal sound presentation level for sound localization testing to assess hearing intervention effects in UCHL was 55 dB. This result may be attributed to the effect of input from the non-masked ear, accounting for interaural attenuation; the effect was considered minimal at 55 dB SPL.
背景/目的:本研究旨在探讨声音定位测试的最佳声音呈现水平,以评估听力干预对单侧传导性听力损失(UCHL)患者的影响。方法:对9名听力正常的受试者进行测试,使用耳罩和耳塞模拟两阶段UCHL。我们创建了两种掩蔽条件:(1)只插入耳塞,(2)插入耳塞并戴上耳套。对每种情况进行声音定位测试。声音呈现水平分别为40、45、50、55、60、65和70 dB SPL,并使用均方根和d值对结果进行评估。结果:在掩蔽条件2中,无论声音表现水平如何,这两个值几乎没有差异,而在掩蔽条件1中,这两个值在55 dB SPL时达到最小。此外,比较掩蔽条件1和掩蔽条件2在每个声音表现级别上的差异,在55 dB SPL时观察到最大的差异。结论:声音定位测试评估UCHL听力干预效果的最佳声音表现水平为55 dB。这一结果可能归因于非掩耳输入的影响,考虑到耳间衰减;在55 dB SPL时,这种影响被认为是最小的。
{"title":"Optimal Sound Presentation Level for Sound Localization Testing in Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss.","authors":"Miki Takahara, Takanori Nishiyama, Yu Fumiiri, Tsubasa Kitama, Makoto Hosoya, Marie N Shimanuki, Masafumi Ueno, Takeshi Wakabayashi, Hiroyuki Ozawa, Naoki Oishi","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040095","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to investigate the optimal sound presentation level for sound localization testing to assess the effect of hearing interventions in individuals with unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL). <b>Methods</b>: Nine participants with normal hearing were tested, and simulated two-stage UCHL was created using earmuffs and earplugs. We created two types of masking conditions: (1) only an earplug inserted, and (2) an earplug inserted with an earmuff worn. A sound localization test was performed for each condition. The sound presentation levels were 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 dB SPL, and the results were evaluated using root mean square and d-values. <b>Results</b>: Both values showed little difference in masking Condition 2, regardless of the sound presentation level, whereas in masking Condition 1, the values were at their minimum at 55 dB SPL. In addition, comparing the differences between masking Conditions 1 and 2 for each sound presentation level, the greatest difference was observed at 55 dB SPL for both values. <b>Conclusions</b>: The optimal sound presentation level for sound localization testing to assess hearing intervention effects in UCHL was 55 dB. This result may be attributed to the effect of input from the non-masked ear, accounting for interaural attenuation; the effect was considered minimal at 55 dB SPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12383159/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-02DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040094
Ayşenur Karaman Demirel, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Ayşe Ayça Çiprut, Nilüfer Bal
Background/Objectives: This study investigated the association between cochlear implant (CI) users' assessed perception of musical sound quality and their subjective music perception and music-related quality of life (QoL). The aim was to provide a comprehensive evaluation by integrating a relatively objective Turkish Multiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor (TR-MUSHRA) test and a subjective music questionnaire. Methods: Thirty CI users and thirty normal-hearing (NH) adults were assessed. Perception of sound quality was measured using the TR-MUSHRA test. Subjective assessments were conducted with the Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MuRQoL). Results: TR-MUSHRA results showed that while NH participants rated all filtered stimuli as perceptually different from the original, CI users provided similar ratings for stimuli with adjacent high-pass filter settings, indicating less differentiation in perceived sound quality. On the MuRQoL, groups differed on the Frequency subscale but not the Importance subscale. Critically, no significant correlation was found between the TR-MUSHRA scores and the MuRQoL subscale scores in either group. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that TR-MUSHRA is an effective tool for assessing perceived sound quality relatively objectively, but there is no relationship between perceiving sound quality differences and measures of self-reported musical engagement and its importance. Subjective music experience may represent different domains beyond the perception of sound quality. Therefore, successful auditory rehabilitation requires personalized strategies that consider the multifaceted nature of music perception beyond simple perceptual judgments.
{"title":"Exploring the Link Between Sound Quality Perception, Music Perception, Music Engagement, and Quality of Life in Cochlear Implant Recipients.","authors":"Ayşenur Karaman Demirel, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Ayşe Ayça Çiprut, Nilüfer Bal","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040094","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study investigated the association between cochlear implant (CI) users' assessed perception of musical sound quality and their subjective music perception and music-related quality of life (QoL). The aim was to provide a comprehensive evaluation by integrating a relatively objective Turkish Multiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor (TR-MUSHRA) test and a subjective music questionnaire. <b>Methods</b>: Thirty CI users and thirty normal-hearing (NH) adults were assessed. Perception of sound quality was measured using the TR-MUSHRA test. Subjective assessments were conducted with the Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MuRQoL). <b>Results</b>: TR-MUSHRA results showed that while NH participants rated all filtered stimuli as perceptually different from the original, CI users provided similar ratings for stimuli with adjacent high-pass filter settings, indicating less differentiation in perceived sound quality. On the MuRQoL, groups differed on the Frequency subscale but not the Importance subscale. Critically, no significant correlation was found between the TR-MUSHRA scores and the MuRQoL subscale scores in either group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings demonstrate that TR-MUSHRA is an effective tool for assessing perceived sound quality relatively objectively, but there is no relationship between perceiving sound quality differences and measures of self-reported musical engagement and its importance. Subjective music experience may represent different domains beyond the perception of sound quality. Therefore, successful auditory rehabilitation requires personalized strategies that consider the multifaceted nature of music perception beyond simple perceptual judgments.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382851/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040093
Tadashi Nishimura, Takanori Nishiyama
Air conduction is the primary pathway for hearing sounds and is widely utilized in various hearing devices [...].
空气传导是听到声音的主要途径,广泛应用于各种助听器[…]。
{"title":"Bone and Cartilage Conduction-Volume II.","authors":"Tadashi Nishimura, Takanori Nishiyama","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040093","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Air conduction is the primary pathway for hearing sounds and is widely utilized in various hearing devices [...].</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382768/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-25DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040092
Eva Orzan, Valeria Gambacorta, Giampietro Ricci
Background/Objectives: Despite its significant impact on learning, classroom acoustics and students' hearing difficulties are often overlooked compared with more visible issues like lighting. Hearing loss-frequently underestimated and invisible-affects both students and teachers, potentially leading to fatigue, reduced participation, and academic challenges. The A.BA.CO. project in Italy was developed to address these issues by promoting improved classroom design, technological solutions, and better auditory communication accessibility in schools. Objective: This article presents the A.BA.CO. project, offering context and an overview of the preliminary analyses conducted by its multidisciplinary team. The goal is to share insights and propose organizational frameworks, technical solutions, and best practices concerning the hearing, communication, and auditory learning challenges experienced by students with hearing impairments. Results: The A.BA.CO. team's analyses identified key barriers to inclusion for students with (or without) hearing impairments, such as poor classroom acoustics, excessive noise, and suboptimal seating arrangements. The project underscores the importance of improved acoustic environments and the integration of assistive technologies, including speech-to-text systems. The findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to design accessible and inclusive educational settings for all learners. Conclusions: Embedding educational audiology within school systems-alongside enhancements in classroom acoustics and the use of assistive technologies and other technological solutions-is essential to ensure that all students, regardless of hearing ability, have equitable access to learning and full participation in educational life.
{"title":"The A.BA.CO. Project and Efforts to Optimize Access to the Sounds of Learning.","authors":"Eva Orzan, Valeria Gambacorta, Giampietro Ricci","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040092","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite its significant impact on learning, classroom acoustics and students' hearing difficulties are often overlooked compared with more visible issues like lighting. Hearing loss-frequently underestimated and invisible-affects both students and teachers, potentially leading to fatigue, reduced participation, and academic challenges. The A.BA.CO. project in Italy was developed to address these issues by promoting improved classroom design, technological solutions, and better auditory communication accessibility in schools. <b>Objective</b>: This article presents the A.BA.CO. project, offering context and an overview of the preliminary analyses conducted by its multidisciplinary team. The goal is to share insights and propose organizational frameworks, technical solutions, and best practices concerning the hearing, communication, and auditory learning challenges experienced by students with hearing impairments. <b>Results</b>: The A.BA.CO. team's analyses identified key barriers to inclusion for students with (or without) hearing impairments, such as poor classroom acoustics, excessive noise, and suboptimal seating arrangements. The project underscores the importance of improved acoustic environments and the integration of assistive technologies, including speech-to-text systems. The findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to design accessible and inclusive educational settings for all learners. <b>Conclusions</b>: Embedding educational audiology within school systems-alongside enhancements in classroom acoustics and the use of assistive technologies and other technological solutions-is essential to ensure that all students, regardless of hearing ability, have equitable access to learning and full participation in educational life.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12383007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/Objectives: To review the dimensions of the round window region (round window niche, bony structures surrounding the niche, and the membrane itself). Methods: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched by two independent reviewers. Anatomical and radiological studies on the round window region were screened. Studies reporting at least one dimension for the round window (RW) niche and/or the RW membrane were included. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (13 anatomical and 3 radiological studies) for a total number of 808 temporal bones with at least one dimension reported. The structures measured varied across the different studies with 12 reporting RW membrane dimensions (area and/or at least one distance), 8 detailing RW niche dimensions (height, width or depth) and 6 which measured at least one element of the RW bony overhangs (posterior or anterior pillar, RW tegmen). Surface area of the RW membrane varied between 0.32 mm2 and 2.89 mm2, with a minimum dimension (minimum diameter or height or width) comprising between 0.51 mm and 2.1 mm. When the bony overhangs surrounding the membrane were not considered, the minimum diameter was between 1.65 mm and 1.97 mm. Conclusions: The dimensions of the RW region are intrinsically variable, but the heterogeneity of the measurements reported also contributes to these variations. Posterior pillar, RW tegmen, anterior pillar, and their relative development probably account for a large part of this variability. The future RW membrane devices should be ≤1 mm in their maximum dimension, whether or not individually tailored, to fit most of the RW membranes.
{"title":"Round Window Niche and Membrane Dimensions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mathieu Marx, Pauline Nieto, Olivier Sagot, Guillaume de Bonnecaze, Yohan Gallois","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040090","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: To review the dimensions of the round window region (round window niche, bony structures surrounding the niche, and the membrane itself). <b>Methods</b>: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched by two independent reviewers. Anatomical and radiological studies on the round window region were screened. Studies reporting at least one dimension for the round window (RW) niche and/or the RW membrane were included. <b>Results</b>: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (13 anatomical and 3 radiological studies) for a total number of 808 temporal bones with at least one dimension reported. The structures measured varied across the different studies with 12 reporting RW membrane dimensions (area and/or at least one distance), 8 detailing RW niche dimensions (height, width or depth) and 6 which measured at least one element of the RW bony overhangs (posterior or anterior pillar, RW tegmen). Surface area of the RW membrane varied between 0.32 mm<sup>2</sup> and 2.89 mm<sup>2</sup>, with a minimum dimension (minimum diameter or height or width) comprising between 0.51 mm and 2.1 mm. When the bony overhangs surrounding the membrane were not considered, the minimum diameter was between 1.65 mm and 1.97 mm. <b>Conclusions</b>: The dimensions of the RW region are intrinsically variable, but the heterogeneity of the measurements reported also contributes to these variations. Posterior pillar, RW tegmen, anterior pillar, and their relative development probably account for a large part of this variability. The future RW membrane devices should be ≤1 mm in their maximum dimension, whether or not individually tailored, to fit most of the RW membranes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040091
Yixiao Wang, Peng Mei, Yunfei Zhao, Jie Lu, Hongbing Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Yuan Zhao, Baoli Zhu, Boshen Wang
Background: Hearing loss is increasingly prevalent and poses a significant public health concern. While both aging and occupational noise exposure are recognized contributors, their interactive effects and gender-specific patterns remain underexplored. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 135,251 employees in Jiangsu Province, China. Demographic information, noise exposure metrics, and hearing thresholds were obtained through field measurements, questionnaires, and audiometric testing. Multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline modeling, and interaction analyses were conducted. Machine learning models were employed to assess feature importance. Results: A nonlinear relationship between age and high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) was identified, with a critical inflection point at 37.8 years. Noise exposure significantly amplified HFHL risk, particularly in older adults (OR = 2.564; 95% CI: 2.456-2.677, p < 0.001), with consistent findings across genders. Men exhibited greater susceptibility at high frequencies, even after adjusting for age and co-exposures. Aging and noise exposure have a joint association with hearing loss (OR = 2.564; 95% CI: 2.456-2.677, p < 0.001) and an interactive association (additive interaction: RERI = 2.075, AP = 0.502, SI = 2.967; multiplicative interaction: OR = 1.265; 95% CI: 1.176-1.36, p < 0.001). And machine learning also confirmed age, gender, and noise exposure as key predictors. Conclusions: Aging and occupational noise exert synergistic effects on auditory decline, with distinct gender disparities. These findings highlight the need for integrated, demographically tailored occupational health strategies. Machine learning approaches further validate key risk factors and support targeted screening for hearing loss prevention.
背景:听力损失越来越普遍,并引起了重大的公共卫生问题。虽然老化和职业噪声暴露都是公认的因素,但它们的相互影响和性别特定模式仍未得到充分探讨。方法:本横断面研究分析了中国江苏省135251名员工的数据。通过现场测量、问卷调查和听力测试获得人口统计信息、噪声暴露指标和听力阈值。进行了多元逻辑回归、受限三次样条建模和相互作用分析。使用机器学习模型来评估特征的重要性。结果:年龄与高频听力损失(HFHL)呈非线性关系,在37.8岁时出现关键拐点。噪声暴露显著增加HFHL的风险,尤其是老年人(OR = 2.564; 95% CI: 2.456-2.677, p < 0.001),性别间的研究结果一致。男性在高频率下表现出更大的易感性,即使在调整了年龄和共同暴露后也是如此。年龄和噪声暴露与听力损失有联合关联(OR = 2.564; 95% CI: 2.456-2.677, p < 0.001)和交互关联(加性交互:rei = 2.075, AP = 0.502, SI = 2.967;乘法交互:OR = 1.265, 95% CI: 1.176-1.36, p < 0.001)。机器学习也证实了年龄、性别和噪音暴露是关键的预测因素。结论:年龄与职业噪声对听力衰退具有协同效应,且性别差异明显。这些发现突出表明,有必要制定符合人口特点的综合职业卫生战略。机器学习方法进一步验证了关键的风险因素,并支持有针对性的听力损失预防筛查。
{"title":"Associations Between Occupational Noise Exposure, Aging, and Gender and Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.","authors":"Yixiao Wang, Peng Mei, Yunfei Zhao, Jie Lu, Hongbing Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Yuan Zhao, Baoli Zhu, Boshen Wang","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040091","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Hearing loss is increasingly prevalent and poses a significant public health concern. While both aging and occupational noise exposure are recognized contributors, their interactive effects and gender-specific patterns remain underexplored. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 135,251 employees in Jiangsu Province, China. Demographic information, noise exposure metrics, and hearing thresholds were obtained through field measurements, questionnaires, and audiometric testing. Multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline modeling, and interaction analyses were conducted. Machine learning models were employed to assess feature importance. <b>Results:</b> A nonlinear relationship between age and high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) was identified, with a critical inflection point at 37.8 years. Noise exposure significantly amplified HFHL risk, particularly in older adults (OR = 2.564; 95% CI: 2.456-2.677, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with consistent findings across genders. Men exhibited greater susceptibility at high frequencies, even after adjusting for age and co-exposures. Aging and noise exposure have a joint association with hearing loss (OR = 2.564; 95% CI: 2.456-2.677, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and an interactive association (additive interaction: RERI = 2.075, AP = 0.502, SI = 2.967; multiplicative interaction: OR = 1.265; 95% CI: 1.176-1.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001). And machine learning also confirmed age, gender, and noise exposure as key predictors. <b>Conclusions:</b> Aging and occupational noise exert synergistic effects on auditory decline, with distinct gender disparities. These findings highlight the need for integrated, demographically tailored occupational health strategies. Machine learning approaches further validate key risk factors and support targeted screening for hearing loss prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-21DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15040089
Martina Battista, Francesca Collesei, Eva Orzan, Marta Fantoni, Davide Bottari
Lip-reading, i.e., the ability to recognize speech using only visual cues, plays a fundamental role in audio-visual speech processing, intelligibility, and comprehension. This capacity is integral to language development and functioning; it emerges in early development, and it slowly evolves. By linking psycholinguistics, psychophysics, and neurophysiology, the present narrative review explores the development and significance of lip-reading across different stages of life, highlighting its role in human communication in both typical and atypical development, e.g., in the presence of hearing or language impairments. We examined how relying on lip-reading becomes crucial when communication occurs in noisy environments and, on the contrary, the impacts that visual barriers can have on speech perception. Finally, this review highlights individual differences and the role of cultural and social contexts for a better understanding of the visual counterpart of speech.
{"title":"Lip-Reading: Advances and Unresolved Questions in a Key Communication Skill.","authors":"Martina Battista, Francesca Collesei, Eva Orzan, Marta Fantoni, Davide Bottari","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040089","DOIUrl":"10.3390/audiolres15040089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lip-reading, i.e., the ability to recognize speech using only visual cues, plays a fundamental role in audio-visual speech processing, intelligibility, and comprehension. This capacity is integral to language development and functioning; it emerges in early development, and it slowly evolves. By linking psycholinguistics, psychophysics, and neurophysiology, the present narrative review explores the development and significance of lip-reading across different stages of life, highlighting its role in human communication in both typical and atypical development, e.g., in the presence of hearing or language impairments. We examined how relying on lip-reading becomes crucial when communication occurs in noisy environments and, on the contrary, the impacts that visual barriers can have on speech perception. Finally, this review highlights individual differences and the role of cultural and social contexts for a better understanding of the visual counterpart of speech.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}