Linacre Quarterly最新文献

A physician struggling to grow in her career finds an apt analogy in being a fledgling gardener and learns to trust that God's hand has been planting the seeds all along.

Catholic medical professionals face increasing challenges to adhering to the faith in the exercise of their professional functions. Growing opposition to traditional Church teaching-particularly with regard to issues of human sexuality and end-of-life care-threaten faithful Catholic clinicians with a form of "white martyrdom," characterized by loss of professional standing. Threats to rights of conscience come from various segments of contemporary society, including professional medical societies and publications that increasingly resemble strident activists rather than dispassionate and measured consensus-builders. Reflection on the relationship between counter-culturalism and joy can be a source of strength for those Catholic physicians facing opposition based on their adherence to the faith in their practice. A review of the historical developments of Christian medicine highlights its counter-cultural stance in contrast to the ancient Greco-Roman traditions that preceded it. Counter-cultural figures such as Ss. Cosmas and Damian, St Basil, and St Philip Neri serve as examples of courageous Christian counter-cultural witnesses in their times. Additionally, St Philip Neri's cheerful ministry in Rome also exemplifies Christian joy as a means of evangelizing in the midst of a culture in decline (as was the Eternal City in the 16th century). The lives of saints who suffered for the Faith remind us that being counter-cultural has consequences. While being called to "speak the truth in love" (Ephesians 4:15), Catholic medical professionals are to show compassion in words and actions as the singular signs of a faithful Christian.

While many Catholic hospitals permit the prescription of the emergency contraception drug levonorgestrel for rape victims, some continue to prohibit this practice as a matter of institutional conscience. While the standard approach to this issue has been to offer an argument that levonorgestrel either is or is not morally permissible, we have taken a different tack. We begin by briefly describing and acknowledging that reasonable disagreement exists on this question (part one), and then arguing that the reasonable disagreement itself can serve as a compelling basis for Catholic leadership at hospitals that prohibit emergency contraception for rape victims to accommodate physicians who wish to provide levonorgestrel as a matter of conscience (part two). We end by anticipating and responding to some objections.

A majority of medical and lay articles regarding crucifixion, and specifically the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, now state that suffocation was the primary cause of death from crucifixion. An in-depth analysis reveals that this theory is based on a form of torture unrelated to crucifixion and that no evidence directly linking suffocation to crucifixion has been published. Indeed, a thorough review of available ancient evidence from literature, artwork, graffiti, and modern archeology and re-enactment studies reveals no evidence in favor of suffocation and much evidence against suffocation as the cause of death in typically-portrayed crucifixions, and particularly for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Researchers are encouraged to look elsewhere for the most likely cause or causes of death from crucifixion. It may be time to abandon the idea that suffocation was the primary cause of death in crucifixion.