Victorian Periodicals Review最新文献_第3页

Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century by Erica Haugtvedt (review) 艾丽卡-豪格特维特（Erica Haugtvedt）所著的《英国十九世纪的跨虚构角色和跨媒体故事世界》（评论

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a927882

Kristen Layne Figgins

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Reviewed by: <ul> <li> Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century by Erica Haugtvedt </li> <li> Kristen Layne Figgins (bio) </li> </ul> Erica Haugtvedt, Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century ( London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. xii + 217, $119.99 cloth, $39.99 paperback. Modern fandom is an exciting phenomenon: buying merch, cosplaying at conventions, and engaging in creative practices such as reading and writing fan fiction all bolster contemporary fan communities. As Erica Haugtvedt deftly argues in Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century, not much has changed since the nineteenth [End Page 505] century. Haugtvedt examines the reception histories of some of nineteenth-century Britain's most popular texts and demonstrates how the approaches of fan communities across media formats help to create community-mediated understandings of character and storyworlds. The selections of media Haugtvedt addresses are diverse, including merchandising, penny dreadfuls, and theatrical productions, but nearly all show the ways in which fandom is a method of meaning-making, especially for the nineteenth century's working classes. Haugtvedt's first chapter, "Introduction: From Novel Studies to Fan Studies," lays out several guiding principles. She is particularly interested in the "cognitive predisposition to orient narratives through the experiences of characters," even when those texts, as "allographic extensions," have different creators and potentially contradict one another (3). Haugtvedt's answer to this problem lies in psychology: we develop schemata for understanding a character. Audiences use these schemas to blend characters from different adaptations, reconciling different traits and characteristics and even vital plot elements into a cohesive whole. In this chapter, Haugtvedt also begins to frame nineteenth-century receptive practices as similar to modern conceptions of fandom, a theme that her book consistently reinforces, right down to the stigma that fans often experience. Notably different from modern fandom, however, are the effects of nineteenth-century copyright and plagiarism laws, which allow for transmedial fan appropriation that in effect authorizes so-called theft of stories and characters. Haugtvedt's second chapter, "Pickwick Abroad (1837–1838): Transfictional Character as Permanent Object," focuses on the character of Mr. Pickwick from Charles Dickens's enormously popular The Pickwick Papers (1836–37). Pickwick, as a character, exemplifies how nineteenth-century audiences engage with character. In discussing George W. M. Reynolds's popular Pickwick Abroad, Haugtvedt not

以下是内容的简要摘录，以代替摘要：评论者艾丽卡-豪格特维特（Erica Haugtvedt）著，《英国 19 世纪的跨虚构角色和跨媒体故事世界》（Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century）（伦敦：帕尔格雷夫-麦克米伦出版社，2022 年），第 xii + 217 页，布书 119.99 美元，平装本 39.99 美元。现代粉丝是一种令人兴奋的现象：购买商品、在会展上扮演角色，以及参与阅读和撰写粉丝小说等创作实践，这些都促进了当代粉丝社区的发展。正如埃里卡-豪格特维特（Erica Haugtvedt）在《英国十九世纪的跨虚构角色和跨媒体故事世界》一书中巧妙地论证的那样，自十九 [尾页 505]世纪以来，这种现象并未发生太大变化。Haugtvedt 研究了十九世纪英国一些最受欢迎文本的接受史，并展示了跨媒体形式的粉丝社区如何帮助创造以社区为媒介的对角色和故事世界的理解。豪格特维特所选取的媒体形式多种多样，包括商品销售、便士恐怖片和戏剧作品，但几乎所有媒体都展示了粉丝如何成为一种意义生成的方法，尤其是对 19 世纪的工人阶级而言。豪格特维特的第一章是 "导言"：从小说研究到粉丝研究 "阐述了几项指导原则。她尤其感兴趣的是 "通过人物的经历来确定叙事方向的认知倾向"，即使这些文本作为 "异体延伸"，有不同的创作者，并可能相互矛盾(3)。豪格特维特从心理学角度回答了这个问题：我们会形成理解人物的图式。观众利用这些图式将不同改编作品中的角色融合在一起，将不同的性格和特征，甚至是重要的情节元素调和成一个有凝聚力的整体。在这一章中，豪格特维特还开始将十九世纪的接受实践与现代的粉丝概念相提并论，这也是她在书中不断强化的主题，甚至包括粉丝经常经历的耻辱。然而，与现代粉丝明显不同的是 19 世纪版权法和剽窃法的影响，这些法律允许跨媒介的粉丝盗用，这实际上授权了对故事和人物的所谓盗窃。豪格特维特的第二章"《匹克威克外传》（1837-1838 年）：Haugtvedt 的第二章"《匹克威克外传》（1837-1838 年）：作为永久性客体的角色转移 "重点讨论了查尔斯-狄更斯广受欢迎的《匹克威克外传》（1836-1837 年）中的匹克威克先生这一角色。匹克威克作为一个人物，体现了十九世纪读者是如何与人物打交道的。在讨论乔治-雷诺兹（George W. M. Reynolds）广受欢迎的《匹克威克外传》（Pickwick Abroad）时，Haugtvedt 注意到狄更斯对其作品的保护，但她也指出，狄更斯在《汉弗莱少爷的钟表》（1840-41 年）中复活匹克威克，削弱了自己："匹克威克先生和他的朋友们在死后继续存在的事实本身就掩盖了这样一种可能性，即他们并不总是像读者最后一次（表面上）看到的那样，凝固在狄更斯的叙述中"(54)。虽然狄更斯希望对自己的创作有最后的评价，但他怀旧地将人物重新放入《汉弗莱少爷的时钟》中，表明了匹克威克在《匹克威克外传》中的冒险经历与当下的生活之间存在差距，而读者将不可避免地试图填补这一差距。空白表明了人物性格的永恒性，或者说匹克威克（像所有人物一样）的生命超越了书页。当一个人物的永恒性受到粉丝补救的威胁时，会发生什么呢？在第 3 章 "杰克-谢泼德（1839-1840 年）：在第 3 章 "杰克-谢帕德（1839-1840 年）：阶级和复杂的 [第 506 页完] 转化角色 "中，豪格特维特介绍了一个有趣的改编延伸例子，其基础是杰克-谢帕德这个历史人物，他是一个小偷和越狱犯，在 18 世纪被处死。他死后几乎立即以文学形式复活，其中最著名的是威廉-哈里森-安斯沃思（William Harrison Ainsworth）的《宾利杂记》连载《杰克-谢泼德》（1839-1840 年），以及大量戏剧改编作品。对豪格特维特来说，尤其有趣的是粉丝改写经典的能力--在粉丝研究中被称为 "fanon"--即使这需要他们为同一角色的不同版本保留空间。豪格特维特认为，"粉丝论 "让杰克-谢帕德的工人阶级粉丝以一种补救的方式重拾了杰克-谢帕德的叙事。在第 4 章 "市场中的《特鲁比》（1894 年）：十九世纪末期的商品销售和作为品牌对象的角色转换 "中，豪特维特探讨了我们经常与现代粉丝联系在一起的那种煽情狂热。这本书的中心是乔治-杜穆里埃笔下的人物特鲁比，杜穆里埃以多种方式将她物化......

{"title":"Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century by Erica Haugtvedt (review)","authors":"Kristen Layne Figgins","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927882","url":null,"abstract":"In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:\u0000 Reviewed by: <ul> <li> Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century by Erica Haugtvedt </li> <li> Kristen Layne Figgins (bio) </li> </ul> Erica Haugtvedt, Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century ( London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. xii + 217, $119.99 cloth, $39.99 paperback. Modern fandom is an exciting phenomenon: buying merch, cosplaying at conventions, and engaging in creative practices such as reading and writing fan fiction all bolster contemporary fan communities. As Erica Haugtvedt deftly argues in Transfictional Character and Transmedia Storyworlds in the British Nineteenth Century, not much has changed since the nineteenth [End Page 505] century. Haugtvedt examines the reception histories of some of nineteenth-century Britain's most popular texts and demonstrates how the approaches of fan communities across media formats help to create community-mediated understandings of character and storyworlds. The selections of media Haugtvedt addresses are diverse, including merchandising, penny dreadfuls, and theatrical productions, but nearly all show the ways in which fandom is a method of meaning-making, especially for the nineteenth century's working classes. Haugtvedt's first chapter, \"Introduction: From Novel Studies to Fan Studies,\" lays out several guiding principles. She is particularly interested in the \"cognitive predisposition to orient narratives through the experiences of characters,\" even when those texts, as \"allographic extensions,\" have different creators and potentially contradict one another (3). Haugtvedt's answer to this problem lies in psychology: we develop schemata for understanding a character. Audiences use these schemas to blend characters from different adaptations, reconciling different traits and characteristics and even vital plot elements into a cohesive whole. In this chapter, Haugtvedt also begins to frame nineteenth-century receptive practices as similar to modern conceptions of fandom, a theme that her book consistently reinforces, right down to the stigma that fans often experience. Notably different from modern fandom, however, are the effects of nineteenth-century copyright and plagiarism laws, which allow for transmedial fan appropriation that in effect authorizes so-called theft of stories and characters. Haugtvedt's second chapter, \"Pickwick Abroad (1837–1838): Transfictional Character as Permanent Object,\" focuses on the character of Mr. Pickwick from Charles Dickens's enormously popular The Pickwick Papers (1836–37). Pickwick, as a character, exemplifies how nineteenth-century audiences engage with character. In discussing George W. M. Reynolds's popular Pickwick Abroad, Haugtvedt not","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141149403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People ed. by Andrew King (review) 工作与 19 世纪的报刊：安德鲁-金编辑的《活人的活计》（评论）

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a927886

Françoise Baillet

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Reviewed by: <ul> <li> Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People ed. by Andrew King </li> <li> Françoise Baillet (bio) </li> </ul> Andrew King, ed., Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People ( New York: Routledge, 2022), pp. xiii + 240, $160.00/£125.00 hardcover, $48.99/£35.99 paperback and e-book. Labour occupied a prominent position in Victorian public discourse. After the Reform Bill of 1832 gave power to the wealthy middle classes, rhetorical constructions increasingly associated labour with manhood and respectability. In line with the principles of evangelical Christianity and under the influence of thinkers such as Thomas Carlyle—"Laborare est Orare. Work is worship" (Past and Present, 1843)—and Samuel Smiles, whose Self-Help (1859) was an instant success, Victorians emphasised work as the condition and instrument of self-improvement. The press played a decisive role in the formulation and dissemination of such values. Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People (2022) precisely addresses this situation, investigating the content, form, and impact of the labour discourse in the pages of trade periodicals or under the pen of professionals. Edited by Andrew King, whose work on the Victorian period lies at the junction between literature, history, media studies, and sociology, this ten-chapter volume derives from the BLT19 project (https://www.blt19.co.uk/), a database of nineteenth-century business, labour, trade, and temperance magazines King launched in 2016. It is published as a complement to The Routledge Handbook to Nineteenth-Century Periodicals and Newspapers (edited by Andrew King, Alexis Easley, and John Morton, 2016) and Researching the Nineteenth-Century Press: Case Studies (edited by Easley, King, and Morton, 2017). Beyond work's centrality as a benchmark of Victorian value, it was a cultural construction formulated and widely disseminated by the press. Pervading all sections of specialised periodicals, the labour rhetoric pertained to five areas: bodily and intellectual practice, social and commercial exchange, class, Christian value, and moral imperative. As King suggests in his introduction to Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press, this set of values can be used as a road map to the whole volume (7). The subsequent chapters assess this discourse as it was circulated by a selection of trade and business periodicals or through the writings of several well-known [End Page 516] figures connected to the printing business. In chapter 2, Andrew Hobbs shows how provincial newspapers and periodicals quickly became "an information technology, providing an infrastructure which assisted efficient trade and employ

以下是内容的简要摘录，以代替摘要：评论者：工作与十九世纪报刊：安德鲁-金编著，《工作与十九世纪报刊：活生生的人的活生生的工作》，弗朗索瓦丝-贝莱（简历）安德鲁-金编著，《工作与十九世纪报刊：New York: Routledge, 2022），第 xiii + 240 页，精装本 160.00 美元/125.00 英镑，平装本和电子书 48.99 美元/35.99 英镑。工党在维多利亚时期的公共话语中占据着重要地位。1832 年《改革法案》赋予富有的中产阶级权力后，修辞结构越来越多地将劳动与男子气概和体面联系在一起。根据基督教福音派的原则，在托马斯-卡莱尔等思想家的影响下，"Laborare est Orare.工作就是崇拜"（《过去与现在》，1843 年）和塞缪尔-斯迈尔斯（Samuel Smiles，其《自助》（1859 年）一举获得成功）等思想家的影响下，维多利亚人强调工作是自我完善的条件和工具。报刊在这种价值观的形成和传播中起到了决定性的作用。工作与十九世纪的报刊：2022 年出版的《工作与十九世纪报刊：活人的活工作》（Work and Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People，2022 年）正是针对这种情况，研究了行业期刊或专业人士笔下的劳工论述的内容、形式和影响。本卷由安德鲁-金（Andrew King）主编，他对维多利亚时期的研究处于文学、历史、媒体研究和社会学的交界处，本卷共十章，源自 BLT19 项目（https://www.blt19.co.uk/），该项目是金于 2016 年发起的一个关于十九世纪商业、劳工、贸易和节制杂志的数据库。该书作为《十九世纪期刊和报纸路特利奇手册》（The Routledge Handbook to Nineteenth-Century Periodicals and Newspapers，由安德鲁-金、亚历克西斯-伊斯利和约翰-莫顿编辑，2016 年）和《研究十九世纪报刊》（Researching the Nineteenth-Century Press：案例研究》（Easley、King 和 Morton 编辑，2017 年）。除了工作作为维多利亚时代价值基准的核心地位外，它还是报刊制定并广泛传播的一种文化建构。在专业期刊的所有版面上，劳动修辞涉及五个方面：身体和智力实践、社会和商业交换、阶级、基督教价值和道德要求。正如金在《工作与十九世纪报刊》的导言中所说，这一系列价值观可以作为通往整本书的路线图（7）。随后的章节将对这一论述进行评估，因为它是通过精选的贸易和商业期刊或与印刷业有关的几位著名 [第516页完] 人物的著作传播的。在第 2 章中，安德鲁-霍布斯（Andrew Hobbs）展示了省级报纸和期刊如何迅速成为 "一种信息技术，提供了有助于高效贸易和就业的基础设施"（38）。通过分析本世纪下半叶六种地方出版物中与贸易、专业和工作相关的内容，霍布斯揭示了报纸专栏中无处不在的商业新闻，并揭示了出版商与地方商业利益之间的紧密联系。这种方法与第 3 章中的 "分类法和程序 "非常一致，King 在该章中提出了维多利亚时期期刊研究领域的全新视角。以 BLT19 项目为例，King 呼吁人们关注数字人文领域分类过程的变革和文化潜力。"他写道："我们如何规划研究领域并对这些领域的单元进行分类的问题，决定了我们理解世界的方式（61）。第 4 章和第 6 章都涉及 19 世纪专业人士的（自）传记建构。在 "页面即舞台 "一章中，安娜-玛丽亚-巴里探讨了歌剧男歌手如何利用报刊宣传他们的技能和促进他们的职业兴趣。弗洛尔-扬森（Flore Janssen）在第 6 章中以玛格丽特-哈克内斯（Margaret Harkness，1854-1923 年）为例，评论了维多利亚时期期刊中对护理的描述。扬森指出，哈克内斯的著作提出了护理工作表述中的矛盾之处，但也证明了女性就业观念的某种程度的演变（111）。职业身份与维多利亚时代关于社会、国家和意识形态价值的假设紧密相连，并通过报刊不断重新谈判。德博拉-卡纳万（Deborah Canavan）在第 5 章和雷切尔-考尔德（Rachel Calder）在第 7 章中都探讨了这个复杂的问题，展示了在市场剧烈动荡、职业易变的背景下，工人如何利用印刷品来确立和维护自己的公众地位。对于...

{"title":"Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People ed. by Andrew King (review)","authors":"Françoise Baillet","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927886","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927886","url":null,"abstract":"In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:\u0000 Reviewed by: <ul> <li> Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People ed. by Andrew King </li> <li> Françoise Baillet (bio) </li> </ul> Andrew King, ed., Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People ( New York: Routledge, 2022), pp. xiii + 240, $160.00/£125.00 hardcover, $48.99/£35.99 paperback and e-book. Labour occupied a prominent position in Victorian public discourse. After the Reform Bill of 1832 gave power to the wealthy middle classes, rhetorical constructions increasingly associated labour with manhood and respectability. In line with the principles of evangelical Christianity and under the influence of thinkers such as Thomas Carlyle—\"Laborare est Orare. Work is worship\" (Past and Present, 1843)—and Samuel Smiles, whose Self-Help (1859) was an instant success, Victorians emphasised work as the condition and instrument of self-improvement. The press played a decisive role in the formulation and dissemination of such values. Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press: Living Work for Living People (2022) precisely addresses this situation, investigating the content, form, and impact of the labour discourse in the pages of trade periodicals or under the pen of professionals. Edited by Andrew King, whose work on the Victorian period lies at the junction between literature, history, media studies, and sociology, this ten-chapter volume derives from the BLT19 project (https://www.blt19.co.uk/), a database of nineteenth-century business, labour, trade, and temperance magazines King launched in 2016. It is published as a complement to The Routledge Handbook to Nineteenth-Century Periodicals and Newspapers (edited by Andrew King, Alexis Easley, and John Morton, 2016) and Researching the Nineteenth-Century Press: Case Studies (edited by Easley, King, and Morton, 2017). Beyond work's centrality as a benchmark of Victorian value, it was a cultural construction formulated and widely disseminated by the press. Pervading all sections of specialised periodicals, the labour rhetoric pertained to five areas: bodily and intellectual practice, social and commercial exchange, class, Christian value, and moral imperative. As King suggests in his introduction to Work and the Nineteenth-Century Press, this set of values can be used as a road map to the whole volume (7). The subsequent chapters assess this discourse as it was circulated by a selection of trade and business periodicals or through the writings of several well-known [End Page 516] figures connected to the printing business. In chapter 2, Andrew Hobbs shows how provincial newspapers and periodicals quickly became \"an information technology, providing an infrastructure which assisted efficient trade and employ","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141149397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Biographies 传记

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a927887

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: <ul> <li> Biographies </li> </ul> Françoise Baillet is Professor of British History and Culture at Université Caen Normandie, France. Her research addresses the role of the periodical press in shaping class, gender, and national identities in nineteenth-century Britain. She has published several articles related to Victorian cultural history and print culture, taking a particular interest in aestheticized renderings of working-class life in the Illustrated London News and the Graphic. She is also the author of Visions and Divisions: Punch's Cultural Discourses and the Victorian Social Order, 1850–1880 (Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2022). Current projects include the digitization of the Punch Pocket Book. Rob Breton is Professor of English Studies at Nipissing University in North Bay, Ontario, Canada. A Victorianist, he focuses on working-class and Chartist fiction. His latest book, The Penny Politics of Victorian Popular Fiction (2021), is with Manchester University Press. Marysa Demoor, Senior Full Professor Emerita of Ghent University, is the author of Their Fair Share: Women, Power and Criticism in the Athenaeum (2000) and editor of Marketing the Author (2004). With Laurel Brake, she edited The Lure of Illustration in the Nineteenth Century: Picture and Press (Palgrave, 2009) and the Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism (2009). With Ingo Berensmeyer and Gert Buelens, she has edited the Cambridge Handbook to Literary Authorship (2019). Her most recent publications are A Cross-Cultural History of Britain and Belgium, 1815–1918: Mudscapes and Artistic Entanglements (Palgrave, 2022) and The Edinburgh Companion to First World War Periodicals (coedited with Cedric Van Dijck and Birgit Van Puymbroeck, 2023). With Andrew King, Andrew Hobbs, and Lisa Peters, she is currently engaged on a four-volume collection, Primary Sources on Nineteenth-Century Journalism: Geographies of Print. Astrid Dröse is a Research Associate at the University of Tübingen. She received her PhD from the LMU Munich in 2015. Her research focuses on the German and European literary and cultural history of the early modern period and the age of Goethe, including periodical studies. In 2022 she completed her habilitation thesis, "Journalpoetik: Literatur und Medienwandel 1770–1840." She also held a summer 2023 substitute professorship at the University of Rostock. Her research is published in the Jahrbuch der Heinrich von Kleist and in edited volumes from Secessioj (Berlin and Zürich) and Aisthesis Verlag (Bielefield). Barbara D. Ferguson currently teaches at the Women and Gender Studies Institute at the Univers

以下是内容的简要摘录，以代替摘要：传记 Françoise Baillet 是法国卡昂诺曼底大学英国历史与文化教授。她的研究涉及期刊媒体在塑造十九世纪英国的阶级、性别和民族身份方面的作用。她发表过多篇与维多利亚文化史和印刷文化相关的文章，尤其对《伦敦新闻画报》和《图画报》中工人阶级生活的审美化描绘感兴趣。她还著有《愿景与分歧》（Visions and Divisions：Punch's Cultural Discourses and the Victorian Social Order, 1850-1880》（雷恩大学出版社，2022 年）。目前的项目包括庞克口袋书的数字化。罗布-布雷顿是加拿大安大略省北湾尼皮辛大学英语研究教授。他是维多利亚时代的作家，主要研究工人阶级和宪章派小说。他的最新著作《维多利亚时期通俗小说的便士政治》（The Penny Politics of Victorian Popular Fiction）（2021 年）由曼彻斯特大学出版社出版。玛丽莎-德莫尔（Marysa Demoor）是根特大学荣誉高级全职教授，著有《她们的公平份额》（Their Fair Share）一书：她们的公平份额：雅典娜中的女性、权力和批评》（2000 年）的作者，以及《作者的营销》（2004 年）的编辑。她与 Laurel Brake 合编了《十九世纪插图的诱惑》（The Lure of Illustration in the Nineteenth Century）：图片与新闻》（Palgrave，2009 年）和《十九世纪新闻学词典》（2009 年）。她与英戈-贝伦斯迈耶（Ingo Berensmeyer）和格特-布伦斯（Gert Buelens）共同编辑了《剑桥文学作者手册》（2019 年）。她最近的著作有《1815-1918 年英国和比利时跨文化史》（A Cross-Cultural History of Britain and Belgium, 1815-1918）：Mudscapes and Artistic Entanglements》（帕尔格雷夫出版社，2022 年）和《The Edinburgh Companion to First World War Periodicals》（与 Cedric Van Dijck 和 Birgit Van Puymbroeck 合著，2023 年）。目前，她正与安德鲁-金、安德鲁-霍布斯和丽莎-彼得斯合作编写四卷本合集《十九世纪新闻业的原始资料》：印刷地理学》。Astrid Dröse 是图宾根大学的助理研究员。她于 2015 年从慕尼黑 LMU 获得博士学位。她的研究重点是德国和欧洲近代早期以及歌德时代的文学和文化史，包括期刊研究。2022 年，她完成了实习论文 "Journalpoetik：Literatur und Medienwandel 1770-1840"。2023 年夏季，她还在罗斯托克大学担任代课教授。她的研究成果发表于《海因里希-冯-克莱斯特年鉴》（Jahrbuch der Heinrich von Kleist），以及由Secessioj（柏林和苏黎世）和Aisthesis Verlag（比勒费尔德）编辑的论文集。芭芭拉-D-弗格森目前在多伦多大学妇女与性别研究学院任教，她经常将十九世纪文学和文化传统融入到她被分配的任何课程中。她的学术研究主要集中于维多利亚时代英国的科学和灵性主义，在那个时代的大部分新闻媒体中，科学和灵性主义被视为对立的认识论，但在推理小说中，它们又以更微妙的方式相互交融。她的文章曾发表在《维多利亚评论》、《维多利亚通俗小说杂志》和《（In）Visible Culture》上。克里斯汀-莱恩-菲金斯（Kristen Layne Figgins）是密西西比女子大学语言、文学和哲学系的英语助理教授。她的研究重点是进化科学如何被改编为跨历史的文字和视觉媒体。她于 2021 年获得博士学位，是《繁荣或萧条：西得克萨斯油田的叙事、生活和文化》（俄克拉荷马大学出版社，2021 年）的共同编辑。Kristin E. Kondrlik 是宾夕法尼亚州西切斯特大学的英语副教授和专业与技术写作辅修课程的联合主任。她的研究成果发表在《维多利亚期刊评论》、《英语语言教学法：过渡时期的英国文学，1880-1920 年》和《POROI：她还与人合编了《文化、历史和实践中的 Veg(etari)an Arguments》一书，由 Palgrave Macmillan 出版社出版。她的研究重点是维多利亚时期和现在医护人员写作中的代理和职业精神，目前正在撰写一本关于冠状病毒大流行期间儿童读物中插图使用的专著。艾玛-利金斯（Emma Liggins）是曼彻斯特城市大学英语系英国文学教授。她的著作包括《乔治-吉辛、职业女性与城市文化》（Ashgate，2006 年）、与安德鲁-莫德和露丝-罗宾斯合编的《英国短篇小说》（Palgrave，2011 年）、《奇女子？1850-1939年英国女性小说中的单身女人、女同性恋和寡妇》（曼彻斯特大学出版社，2014年），以及《女性小说中的鬼屋》（曼彻斯特大学出版社，2011年）。

{"title":"Biographies","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927887","url":null,"abstract":"In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:\u0000 <ul> <li> Biographies </li> </ul> Françoise Baillet is Professor of British History and Culture at Université Caen Normandie, France. Her research addresses the role of the periodical press in shaping class, gender, and national identities in nineteenth-century Britain. She has published several articles related to Victorian cultural history and print culture, taking a particular interest in aestheticized renderings of working-class life in the Illustrated London News and the Graphic. She is also the author of Visions and Divisions: Punch's Cultural Discourses and the Victorian Social Order, 1850–1880 (Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2022). Current projects include the digitization of the Punch Pocket Book. Rob Breton is Professor of English Studies at Nipissing University in North Bay, Ontario, Canada. A Victorianist, he focuses on working-class and Chartist fiction. His latest book, The Penny Politics of Victorian Popular Fiction (2021), is with Manchester University Press. Marysa Demoor, Senior Full Professor Emerita of Ghent University, is the author of Their Fair Share: Women, Power and Criticism in the Athenaeum (2000) and editor of Marketing the Author (2004). With Laurel Brake, she edited The Lure of Illustration in the Nineteenth Century: Picture and Press (Palgrave, 2009) and the Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism (2009). With Ingo Berensmeyer and Gert Buelens, she has edited the Cambridge Handbook to Literary Authorship (2019). Her most recent publications are A Cross-Cultural History of Britain and Belgium, 1815–1918: Mudscapes and Artistic Entanglements (Palgrave, 2022) and The Edinburgh Companion to First World War Periodicals (coedited with Cedric Van Dijck and Birgit Van Puymbroeck, 2023). With Andrew King, Andrew Hobbs, and Lisa Peters, she is currently engaged on a four-volume collection, Primary Sources on Nineteenth-Century Journalism: Geographies of Print. Astrid Dröse is a Research Associate at the University of Tübingen. She received her PhD from the LMU Munich in 2015. Her research focuses on the German and European literary and cultural history of the early modern period and the age of Goethe, including periodical studies. In 2022 she completed her habilitation thesis, \"Journalpoetik: Literatur und Medienwandel 1770–1840.\" She also held a summer 2023 substitute professorship at the University of Rostock. Her research is published in the Jahrbuch der Heinrich von Kleist and in edited volumes from Secessioj (Berlin and Zürich) and Aisthesis Verlag (Bielefield). Barbara D. Ferguson currently teaches at the Women and Gender Studies Institute at the Univers","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141258029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Evolution and Political Revolution in Blackwood's Periodical Poetry 布莱克伍德期刊诗歌中的演变与政治革命

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912316

Anne Dewitt

Abstract:In May 1861, the middlebrow British monthly Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine published a comic poem titled "The Origin of Species." While foregrounding Charles Darwin, the poem portrays evolution as teleological, progressive, and driven by the agency and desires of individual organisms—a misrepresentation of Darwin's theory. I argue that the poem undertakes this misrepresentation deliberately: the version of evolution it attributes to Darwin was associated with radical politics and threats to the social order. The Blackwood's poems call up these political associations to reduce the novelty of Darwin's theory and to hint at its dangerous social tendencies.

摘要：1861 年 5 月，英国中产阶级月刊《布莱克伍德的爱丁堡杂志》发表了一首题为 "物种起源 "的漫画诗。在突出查尔斯-达尔文的同时，这首诗将进化论描绘成目的论的、渐进的、由生物个体的能动性和欲望驱动的--这是对达尔文理论的歪曲。我认为，这首诗是有意进行这种歪曲的：它认为达尔文的进化论与激进政治和对社会秩序的威胁有关。布莱克伍德的诗歌唤起了这些政治联想，以削弱达尔文理论的新颖性，并暗示其危险的社会倾向。

引用次数: 0

Mapping the Multitudes, Discovering the Margins: Feminist-Focused Macro Network Analysis and a Visualization-Based Digital Archive as Coevolving Digital Humanities Tools 绘制众生相，发现边缘：以女性主义为重点的宏观网络分析和基于可视化的数字档案是共同发展的数字人文工具

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912321

Andrea Stewart

Abstract:In a post-pandemic world, digital humanities is facing a new moment of opportunity to move beyond the roadblocks of the past—such as resistance to the crossover between feminist and technological projects and a tendency to construct digital tools without specific interpretive intent—and find a blended purpose in developing technological and methodological tools that not only make cultural contributions but also encourage the serendipitous discoveries that are crucial to the work of feminist scholars. Building on such an interconnected developmental relationship, this essay argues that digital tools and analytic methodologies can work together to inform and transform one another.

摘要:在后流行世界中，数字人文学科正面临着一个新的机遇时刻，它可以超越过去的障碍--例如对女性主义与技术项目之间交叉的抵制，以及在构建数字工具时没有特定解释意图的倾向--并在开发技术与方法工具时找到一个混合的目的，这些工具不仅可以做出文化贡献，还可以鼓励对女性主义学者的工作至关重要的偶然发现。在这种相互关联的发展关系基础上，本文认为数字工具和分析方法论可以共同发挥作用，相互借鉴、相互转化。

引用次数: 0

Searching for "larrikin*": Using Digitised Newspapers to Trace the Transnational Coverage of Australian Street Gangs, 1870–98 搜索 "larrikin*"：利用数字化报纸追踪 1870-98 年澳大利亚街头帮派的跨国报道

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912320

Jasper Heeks

Abstract:Digitisation is revitalising nineteenth-century periodicals as historical sources, particularly English-language publications. Far from replicas, these digitised sources have different attributes. Text searchability is one such property that is changing how and what historians can research. This article explores the use of keyword search to trace the transnational circulations of information about Australian juvenile street gangs and the controversy they aroused. Without multi-title, text-searchable archives it would not be feasible to attempt to discern the form and extent of this coverage. The article reflects on the new depth and breadth keyword searching can offer and some of the methodological choices and considerations involved.

摘要:数字化使十九世纪期刊，尤其是英文出版物作为历史资料焕发出新的活力。这些数字化资料远非复制品，而是具有不同的属性。文本可搜索性就是改变历史学家研究方式和内容的属性之一。本文探讨了如何利用关键词搜索来追踪有关澳大利亚青少年街头帮派及其所引发争议的跨国流传信息。如果没有多标题、可进行文本检索的档案，试图辨别这种报道的形式和范围是不可行的。文章反思了关键词搜索所能提供的新的深度和广度，以及所涉及的一些方法选择和考虑因素。

引用次数: 0

Endnotes 尾注

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912328

引用次数: 0

The Power of Public Opinion and the Rise of "Both Sides": Formal Constraints in the British Controversialist 舆论的力量与 "双方 "的崛起：英国争议派的形式限制

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912319

J. Selbin

Abstract:This essay raises the profile of the understudied British Controversialist (1850–72), a monthly magazine that distinguished itself from peer cultural miscellanies by foregrounding opinion essays by working-class readers that the editors framed as a dialogic forum for gauging and augmenting what they called "the power" of "public opinion." But if the Controversialist sought and achieved a significant expansion of the conversational demos, this essay argues, its pluralist ambitions were also compromised by the editors' self-imposed formal constraints, including limitations on style and authorship. Ultimately, these issues presage contemporary questions about how debate should be orchestrated and who should participate.

摘要:这篇文章提高了英国《争论者》（1850-72 年）的知名度，这份月刊通过突出工人阶级读者的观点文章，将自己与同类文化杂文区分开来，编辑们将其定位为一个对话论坛，以衡量和增强他们所谓的 "公众舆论 "的 "力量"。但本文认为，如果说《争论者》寻求并实现了对话人群的显著扩大，那么编辑们自我设置的形式限制（包括对风格和作者的限制）也损害了它的多元化雄心。归根结底，这些问题预示着当代关于如何组织辩论以及谁应参与辩论的问题。

引用次数: 0

The Wood Engravers' Self-Portrait: The Dalziel Archive and Victorian Illustration by Bethan Stevens (review) 木雕师的自画像：贝瑟恩-史蒂文斯（Bethan Stevens）的《达尔齐尔档案和维多利亚时期的插图》（评论

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912325

L. Kooistra

引用次数: 0

Consuming Female Beauty: British Literature and Periodicals, 1840–1914 by Michelle J. Smith (review) 消费女性之美：英国文学和期刊，1840-1914 年》，作者 Michelle J. Smith（评论）

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Victorian Periodicals Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/vpr.2023.a912326

Julia McCord Chavez

引用次数: 0