Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-16DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09396-5
Boris Kaiser, Andreas Kohler, Christian P R Schmid
The expansion of public health insurance programs affects payers as well as the behavior of service providers. In this paper, we study the expansion of Swiss mandatory health insurance in 2012 to include complementary and alternative medicine physician services. The policy change provides a quasi-experimental design that allows us to estimate the causal effects on the payer and physician behavior using a difference-in-differences framework. First, we find that from the payer's perspective, expanding coverage to complementary and alternative medicine increases physician costs per patient by about 7 percent. Second, we find that the increase in physician service costs per patient in mandatory health insurance is almost exactly offset by a decrease in supplementary health insurance costs. Thus, suggesting that the behavior of physicians was unchanged by the coverage expansion.
{"title":"The causal effects of mandatory health insurance coverage expansion in Switzerland.","authors":"Boris Kaiser, Andreas Kohler, Christian P R Schmid","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09396-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09396-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expansion of public health insurance programs affects payers as well as the behavior of service providers. In this paper, we study the expansion of Swiss mandatory health insurance in 2012 to include complementary and alternative medicine physician services. The policy change provides a quasi-experimental design that allows us to estimate the causal effects on the payer and physician behavior using a difference-in-differences framework. First, we find that from the payer's perspective, expanding coverage to complementary and alternative medicine increases physician costs per patient by about 7 percent. Second, we find that the increase in physician service costs per patient in mandatory health insurance is almost exactly offset by a decrease in supplementary health insurance costs. Thus, suggesting that the behavior of physicians was unchanged by the coverage expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"193-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361299/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09392-9
Kaan Celebi, Jochen Hartwig, Anna Pauliina Sandqvist
Baumol's (Am Econ Rev 57: 415-426, 1967) model of 'unbalanced growth' yields a supply-side explanation for the 'cost explosion' in health care. Applying a testing strategy suggested by Hartwig (J Health Econ 27: 603-623, 2008), a sprawling literature affirms that the 'Baumol effect' has both a statistically and economically significant impact on health care expenditure growth. Skeptics maintain, however, that the proliferation of hi-tech medicine in acute care is clearly at odds with the assumption underlying Baumol's model that productivity-enhancing machinery and equipment is only installed in the 'progressive' (i.e. manufacturing) sector of the economy. They argue that Baumol's cost disease may affect long-term care, but not acute care. Our aim in this paper is to test whether Baumol's cost disease affects long-term care and acute care differently. Our testing strategy consists in combining Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) with an outlier-robust MM estimator. Using panel data for 23 OECD countries, our results provide robust and statistically significant evidence that expenditures on both acute care and long-term care are driven by Baumol's cost disease, even though the effect on long-term care expenditures is more pronounced.
{"title":"Baumol's cost disease in acute versus long-term care: Do the differences loom large?","authors":"Kaan Celebi, Jochen Hartwig, Anna Pauliina Sandqvist","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09392-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09392-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Baumol's (Am Econ Rev 57: 415-426, 1967) model of 'unbalanced growth' yields a supply-side explanation for the 'cost explosion' in health care. Applying a testing strategy suggested by Hartwig (J Health Econ 27: 603-623, 2008), a sprawling literature affirms that the 'Baumol effect' has both a statistically and economically significant impact on health care expenditure growth. Skeptics maintain, however, that the proliferation of hi-tech medicine in acute care is clearly at odds with the assumption underlying Baumol's model that productivity-enhancing machinery and equipment is only installed in the 'progressive' (i.e. manufacturing) sector of the economy. They argue that Baumol's cost disease may affect long-term care, but not acute care. Our aim in this paper is to test whether Baumol's cost disease affects long-term care and acute care differently. Our testing strategy consists in combining Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) with an outlier-robust MM estimator. Using panel data for 23 OECD countries, our results provide robust and statistically significant evidence that expenditures on both acute care and long-term care are driven by Baumol's cost disease, even though the effect on long-term care expenditures is more pronounced.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"159-191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z
Viktoria Szenkurök, Daniela Weber, Marcel Bilger
The rising number of older adults with limitations in their daily activities has major implications for the demands placed on long-term care (LTC) systems across Europe. Recognizing that demand can be both constrained and encouraged by individual and country-specific factors, this study explains the uptake of home-based long-term care in 18 European countries with LTC policies and pension generosity along with individual factors such as socioeconomic status. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe conducted in 2019, we apply a two-part multilevel model to assess if disparities in use of LTC are driven by disparities in needs or disparities in use of care when in need. While individual characteristics largely affect the use of care through its association with disparities in need, country-level characteristics are important for the use of care when in need. In particular, the better health of wealthier and more educated individuals makes them less likely to use any type of home-based personal care. At the country level, results show that the absence of a means-tested benefit scheme and the availability of cash-for-care benefits (as opposed to in-kind) are strongly associated with the use of formal care, whether it is mixed (with informal care) or exclusive. LTC policies are, however, shown to be insufficient to significantly reduce unmet needs for personal care. Conversely, generous pensions are significantly associated with lower unmet needs, underscoring the importance of considering the likely adverse effects of future pension reforms.
{"title":"Informal and formal long-term care utilization and unmet needs in Europe: examining socioeconomic disparities and the role of social policies for older adults.","authors":"Viktoria Szenkurök, Daniela Weber, Marcel Bilger","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising number of older adults with limitations in their daily activities has major implications for the demands placed on long-term care (LTC) systems across Europe. Recognizing that demand can be both constrained and encouraged by individual and country-specific factors, this study explains the uptake of home-based long-term care in 18 European countries with LTC policies and pension generosity along with individual factors such as socioeconomic status. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe conducted in 2019, we apply a two-part multilevel model to assess if disparities in use of LTC are driven by disparities in needs or disparities in use of care when in need. While individual characteristics largely affect the use of care through its association with disparities in need, country-level characteristics are important for the use of care when in need. In particular, the better health of wealthier and more educated individuals makes them less likely to use any type of home-based personal care. At the country level, results show that the absence of a means-tested benefit scheme and the availability of cash-for-care benefits (as opposed to in-kind) are strongly associated with the use of formal care, whether it is mixed (with informal care) or exclusive. LTC policies are, however, shown to be insufficient to significantly reduce unmet needs for personal care. Conversely, generous pensions are significantly associated with lower unmet needs, underscoring the importance of considering the likely adverse effects of future pension reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"87-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003520/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141077158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09387-y
Giorgio Matteucci, Daniele De Santis
To assess the impact on pharmaceutical wholesalers' financial viability and efficiency of the reform of the wholesalers' and pharmacies' margins on reimbursable drugs enacted in 2010 that halved the distributors' margins. We perform a stochastic frontier analysis on a large original dataset comprising financial and production data from 2009, a year prior to the reform, to 2019 gathered in order to assess the impact of the reform on firms' profitability and efficiency. The implemented policies have not been successful in fostering the development of a more efficient market that would ultimately benefit social welfare. Overall, our findings indicate that bigger firms lag behind their smaller counterparts in terms of efficiency, even in the long run. Our findings also suggest that an efficient pharmaceutical wholesaler is currently unable to generate normal profit from the distribution of reimbursable drugs. Compared to the other European countries, that seem to have a cost oriented approach, Italy provides one of the lowest margins to pharmaceutical wholesalers without properly considering the costs of the drugs' distribution. A new regulatory approach to wholesaling margins is needed in order to improve efficiency and welfare.
{"title":"The pharmaceutical distributors' efficiency in Italy: an assessment of the impact of the 2010 reimbursable drug pricing reform.","authors":"Giorgio Matteucci, Daniele De Santis","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09387-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09387-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the impact on pharmaceutical wholesalers' financial viability and efficiency of the reform of the wholesalers' and pharmacies' margins on reimbursable drugs enacted in 2010 that halved the distributors' margins. We perform a stochastic frontier analysis on a large original dataset comprising financial and production data from 2009, a year prior to the reform, to 2019 gathered in order to assess the impact of the reform on firms' profitability and efficiency. The implemented policies have not been successful in fostering the development of a more efficient market that would ultimately benefit social welfare. Overall, our findings indicate that bigger firms lag behind their smaller counterparts in terms of efficiency, even in the long run. Our findings also suggest that an efficient pharmaceutical wholesaler is currently unable to generate normal profit from the distribution of reimbursable drugs. Compared to the other European countries, that seem to have a cost oriented approach, Italy provides one of the lowest margins to pharmaceutical wholesalers without properly considering the costs of the drugs' distribution. A new regulatory approach to wholesaling margins is needed in order to improve efficiency and welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09389-4
Patricia Moreno-Mencia, Ana Fernández-Sainz, Juan M Rodríguez-Póo
Depression is a common disorder that impacts on individuals' ability to perform daily activities, including those required for working. People with poor health tend to have problems needing medical care and therefore need time away from their work. This paper considers a structural model of labor absenteeism, considering the effect of depression. Our objective is to estimate the effects that depressive symptoms (among other factors) have on absenteeism while avoiding inconsistency in estimators due to sample selection and endogenous regressor. We are unwilling to impose strong assumptions, which are sometimes not required by theory, so our model is semiparametric. Based on microdata from the European Health Survey in Spain, our results indicate that depressive symptoms have a negative effect on working time and increase absenteeism. We conclude that depressed workers lose on average around 12 more days per year than non depressed ones. Levels of absenteeism are also estimated to be higher on average among obese people and among older people (the effect of age is positive). On the other hand, non-college education, being male and being self-employed are factors related to lower levels of absenteeism.
{"title":"Do depressive symptoms influence nonattendance at work? A semiparametric approach.","authors":"Patricia Moreno-Mencia, Ana Fernández-Sainz, Juan M Rodríguez-Póo","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09389-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09389-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression is a common disorder that impacts on individuals' ability to perform daily activities, including those required for working. People with poor health tend to have problems needing medical care and therefore need time away from their work. This paper considers a structural model of labor absenteeism, considering the effect of depression. Our objective is to estimate the effects that depressive symptoms (among other factors) have on absenteeism while avoiding inconsistency in estimators due to sample selection and endogenous regressor. We are unwilling to impose strong assumptions, which are sometimes not required by theory, so our model is semiparametric. Based on microdata from the European Health Survey in Spain, our results indicate that depressive symptoms have a negative effect on working time and increase absenteeism. We conclude that depressed workers lose on average around 12 more days per year than non depressed ones. Levels of absenteeism are also estimated to be higher on average among obese people and among older people (the effect of age is positive). On the other hand, non-college education, being male and being self-employed are factors related to lower levels of absenteeism.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"67-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003569/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09383-2
Sara Pinillos-Franco, David Cantarero-Prieto, Javier Lera
Most part of the literature has highlighted the detrimental effects of discrimination on health. However, the influence of past and perceived discrimination on older workers' self-assessed health has been understudied. Firstly, we aim at studying whether reported discrimination is associated with self-assessed health among adults of working ages (50-65 years of age). Secondly, we analyze the existence of differences by gender. Data was retrieved from the seventh wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to obtain the regular panel of questions, and the third and seventh waves of the SHARELIFE questionnaire, that includes information about discrimination (n = 30,019). We develop logistic regression models to determine the relationship of discrimination on male and female workers' self-assessed health separately. Our results show that 49.0% of our sample was composed of highly discriminated women, while the remaining percentage covered men and women (42.3% males and 8.7% females) that reported lower levels of discrimination. Our estimations reveal a significant association between discrimination and poor health status, especially in the case of men ranging from OR = 1.802 (95% CI 1.502-2.163) to OR = 1.565 (95% CI 1.282-1.910). In the case of women our results range from OR = 1.728 (95% CI 1.463-2.040) to OR = 1.196 (95% CI 0.992-1.442). These findings are essential to highlight the importance of tackling discrimination as a determinant of health that negatively affects both sexes, men and women.
大部分文献都强调了歧视对健康的不利影响。然而,过去和感知到的歧视对老年工人自我评估健康状况的影响还没有得到充分研究。首先,我们旨在研究报告的歧视是否与工作年龄的成年人(50-65 岁)的自我健康评估有关。其次,我们分析了性别差异的存在。我们从 "欧洲健康、老龄和退休调查"(SHARE)第七次调查中获取数据,以获得常规问题面板,以及包含歧视信息的 "SHARELIFE "问卷第三和第七次调查(n = 30,019)。我们分别建立了逻辑回归模型,以确定歧视与男性和女性工人自我评估的健康状况之间的关系。我们的结果显示,49.0% 的样本由高度受歧视的女性组成,而其余比例则涵盖了报告受歧视程度较低的男性和女性(男性占 42.3%,女性占 8.7%)。我们的估计结果表明,歧视与健康状况不良之间存在显著关联,尤其是男性,从 OR = 1.802(95% CI 1.502-2.163)到 OR = 1.565(95% CI 1.282-1.910)不等。就女性而言,我们的结果从 OR = 1.728(95% CI 1.463-2.040)到 OR = 1.196(95% CI 0.992-1.442)不等。这些研究结果对于强调解决歧视问题的重要性至关重要,因为歧视是影响男女健康的一个决定因素。
{"title":"Feeling discriminated means poor self-perceived health: a gender analysis using SHARE.","authors":"Sara Pinillos-Franco, David Cantarero-Prieto, Javier Lera","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09383-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09383-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most part of the literature has highlighted the detrimental effects of discrimination on health. However, the influence of past and perceived discrimination on older workers' self-assessed health has been understudied. Firstly, we aim at studying whether reported discrimination is associated with self-assessed health among adults of working ages (50-65 years of age). Secondly, we analyze the existence of differences by gender. Data was retrieved from the seventh wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to obtain the regular panel of questions, and the third and seventh waves of the SHARELIFE questionnaire, that includes information about discrimination (n = 30,019). We develop logistic regression models to determine the relationship of discrimination on male and female workers' self-assessed health separately. Our results show that 49.0% of our sample was composed of highly discriminated women, while the remaining percentage covered men and women (42.3% males and 8.7% females) that reported lower levels of discrimination. Our estimations reveal a significant association between discrimination and poor health status, especially in the case of men ranging from OR = 1.802 (95% CI 1.502-2.163) to OR = 1.565 (95% CI 1.282-1.910). In the case of women our results range from OR = 1.728 (95% CI 1.463-2.040) to OR = 1.196 (95% CI 0.992-1.442). These findings are essential to highlight the importance of tackling discrimination as a determinant of health that negatively affects both sexes, men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"107-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142356047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x
Cristian Pardo, Jorge Sabat
This paper analyzes the impact of flat premiums on equity and efficiency within a regulated market. We examine the consequences of shifting from a risk-adjusted premium model to a flat premium system, particularly focusing on how this shift affects different income groups and market efficiency. Using a combination of theoretical modeling and empirical analysis, we find that flat premiums may lead to increased cross-subsidization among participants, with notable effects on both equity and efficiency. Our results suggest that while flat premiums simplify the regulatory framework, they also introduce trade-offs that policymakers must carefully consider.
{"title":"Equity and efficiency effects of flat premiums.","authors":"Cristian Pardo, Jorge Sabat","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper analyzes the impact of flat premiums on equity and efficiency within a regulated market. We examine the consequences of shifting from a risk-adjusted premium model to a flat premium system, particularly focusing on how this shift affects different income groups and market efficiency. Using a combination of theoretical modeling and empirical analysis, we find that flat premiums may lead to increased cross-subsidization among participants, with notable effects on both equity and efficiency. Our results suggest that while flat premiums simplify the regulatory framework, they also introduce trade-offs that policymakers must carefully consider.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"27-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09384-1
Rikard Forslid, Mathias Herzing
The aim of this paper is to shed light on the economic and epidemiological trade-offs that emerge when choosing between different vaccination strategies. For that purpose we employ a setting with three age groups that differ with respect to their fatality rates. The model also accounts for heterogeneity in the transmission rates between and within these age groups. We compare the results for two different contact patterns, in terms of the total number of deceased, the total number of infected, the peak infection rate and the economic gains from different vaccination strategies. We find that fatalities are minimized by first vaccinating the elderly, except when vaccination is slow and the general transmission rate is relatively low. In this case deaths are minimized by first vaccinating the group that is mainly responsible for spreading of the virus. With regard to the other outcome variables it is best to vaccinate the group that drives the pandemic first. A trade-off may therefore emerge between reducing fatalities on the one hand and lowering the number of infected as well as maximizing the economic gains from vaccinations on the other hand.
{"title":"Vaccination strategies for different contact patterns: weighing epidemiological against economic outcomes.","authors":"Rikard Forslid, Mathias Herzing","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09384-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09384-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this paper is to shed light on the economic and epidemiological trade-offs that emerge when choosing between different vaccination strategies. For that purpose we employ a setting with three age groups that differ with respect to their fatality rates. The model also accounts for heterogeneity in the transmission rates between and within these age groups. We compare the results for two different contact patterns, in terms of the total number of deceased, the total number of infected, the peak infection rate and the economic gains from different vaccination strategies. We find that fatalities are minimized by first vaccinating the elderly, except when vaccination is slow and the general transmission rate is relatively low. In this case deaths are minimized by first vaccinating the group that is mainly responsible for spreading of the virus. With regard to the other outcome variables it is best to vaccinate the group that drives the pandemic first. A trade-off may therefore emerge between reducing fatalities on the one hand and lowering the number of infected as well as maximizing the economic gains from vaccinations on the other hand.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"131-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-07-13DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09381-4
Cindy Chamorro, Manuel Fernández, Oscar Espinosa
Our study evaluates the liquidation effect of a health insurer from a subsidized scheme, with the largest number of members in Colombia, on restrictions to future access to user care. Based on the information regarding complaints and judicial claims about healthcare, the effect of this government decision is estimated using a dynamic econometric model of differences in differences. Our results suggest that the liquidation of the Health-Promoting Entity (EPS, its acronym in Spanish) CAPRECOM has a negative effect, specifically, it led to an increase of 0.32 and 0.21 in complaints rates per 1,000 members in the receiving EPSs during the first and second quarters after the intervention, respectively. However, this effect does not persist over time and becomes diluted in the following quarters. There is no evidence of a relationship between the magnitude of the effect and the EPSs performance ranking. Additionally, we do not find significant effects on judicial claims. Our results are important concerning the design and implementation of public policies for EPSs liquidation. We demonstrate the necessity of implementing actions to incorporate guidelines and strategic plans during the transition period. Such actions would enable safeguarding the right to health for the affected population in a liquidation insurer case.
{"title":"The effect of the exit of an insurer, due to government liquidation, on access to health care: evidence from Colombia.","authors":"Cindy Chamorro, Manuel Fernández, Oscar Espinosa","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09381-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09381-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study evaluates the liquidation effect of a health insurer from a subsidized scheme, with the largest number of members in Colombia, on restrictions to future access to user care. Based on the information regarding complaints and judicial claims about healthcare, the effect of this government decision is estimated using a dynamic econometric model of differences in differences. Our results suggest that the liquidation of the Health-Promoting Entity (EPS, its acronym in Spanish) CAPRECOM has a negative effect, specifically, it led to an increase of 0.32 and 0.21 in complaints rates per 1,000 members in the receiving EPSs during the first and second quarters after the intervention, respectively. However, this effect does not persist over time and becomes diluted in the following quarters. There is no evidence of a relationship between the magnitude of the effect and the EPSs performance ranking. Additionally, we do not find significant effects on judicial claims. Our results are important concerning the design and implementation of public policies for EPSs liquidation. We demonstrate the necessity of implementing actions to incorporate guidelines and strategic plans during the transition period. Such actions would enable safeguarding the right to health for the affected population in a liquidation insurer case.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"51-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141604338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09382-3
Aparna Soni
Overdose deaths from prescription opioids remain elevated, and policymakers seek solutions to curb opioid misuse. Recent proposals call for price-based solutions, such as opioid taxes and removal of opioids from insurance formularies. However, there is limited evidence on how opioid consumption responds to price stimuli. This study addresses that gap by estimating the effects of prices on the utilization of opioids, as well as other prescription painkillers. I use nationally representative individual-level data on prescription drug purchases and exploit the introduction of Medicare Part D in 2006 as an exogenous change in out-of-pocket drug prices. I find that new users have a relatively high price elasticity of demand for prescription opioids, and that consumers treat over-the-counter painkillers as substitutes for prescription painkillers. My results suggest that increasing out-of-pocket prices of opioids, through formulary design or taxes, may be effective in reducing new opioid use.
处方阿片类药物过量导致的死亡人数仍然居高不下,政策制定者正在寻求遏制阿片类药物滥用的解决方案。最近的提案呼吁采取基于价格的解决方案,如征收阿片类药物税和将阿片类药物从保险目录中删除。然而,关于阿片类药物消费如何对价格刺激做出反应的证据却很有限。本研究通过估算价格对阿片类药物以及其他处方止痛药使用的影响,弥补了这一空白。我使用了具有全国代表性的个人处方药购买数据,并利用 2006 年医疗保险 D 部分的推出作为自付药价的外生变化。我发现,新用户对处方阿片类药物的需求价格弹性相对较高,消费者将非处方止痛药视为处方止痛药的替代品。我的研究结果表明,通过处方设计或税收来提高阿片类药物的自付价格,可能会有效减少阿片类药物的新增使用。
{"title":"Estimating price elasticities of demand for pain relief drugs: evidence from Medicare Part D.","authors":"Aparna Soni","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09382-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09382-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overdose deaths from prescription opioids remain elevated, and policymakers seek solutions to curb opioid misuse. Recent proposals call for price-based solutions, such as opioid taxes and removal of opioids from insurance formularies. However, there is limited evidence on how opioid consumption responds to price stimuli. This study addresses that gap by estimating the effects of prices on the utilization of opioids, as well as other prescription painkillers. I use nationally representative individual-level data on prescription drug purchases and exploit the introduction of Medicare Part D in 2006 as an exogenous change in out-of-pocket drug prices. I find that new users have a relatively high price elasticity of demand for prescription opioids, and that consumers treat over-the-counter painkillers as substitutes for prescription painkillers. My results suggest that increasing out-of-pocket prices of opioids, through formulary design or taxes, may be effective in reducing new opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"481-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}