Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09398-3
David H Howard, Michal Horný, Marcus Dillender
Based on the belief that fee-for-service reimbursement contributes to the overuse of costly medical procedures, policymakers have sought to cut payments for low-value services. Using a difference-in-differences model and Medicare claims linked with cancer registry records, we evaluate the impact of a large payment reduction for an imaging procedure commonly used in prostate cancer patients. We find that the payment cut did not affect imaging use, even in low-risk patients for whom imaging is not recommended. Our results suggest that supply may be relatively insensitive to fee levels when decisions about the use of a service are made exclusively by referring physicians, not the physicians who deliver and receive payment for it.
{"title":"Fee cuts for radiology and low-value imaging.","authors":"David H Howard, Michal Horný, Marcus Dillender","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09398-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09398-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on the belief that fee-for-service reimbursement contributes to the overuse of costly medical procedures, policymakers have sought to cut payments for low-value services. Using a difference-in-differences model and Medicare claims linked with cancer registry records, we evaluate the impact of a large payment reduction for an imaging procedure commonly used in prostate cancer patients. We find that the payment cut did not affect imaging use, even in low-risk patients for whom imaging is not recommended. Our results suggest that supply may be relatively insensitive to fee levels when decisions about the use of a service are made exclusively by referring physicians, not the physicians who deliver and receive payment for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"383-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144700006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-04-09DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09394-7
Oscar Espinosa, Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes, Jhonathan Rodríguez, Diego Ávila, Sergio Basto, Giancarlo Romano, Lorena Mesa, Hernán Enríquez
Expanding explicit Health Benefit Plans (HBP) is a key strategy for achieving universal health coverage while maintaining financial sustainability. However, little is known about the broader effects of periodic updates to these plans on healthcare utilization, expenditures, and market dynamics. This study examines the impact of including new health technologies in Colombia's HBP covered by the Capitation Payment Unit (CPU) between 2012 and 2019, using administrative data and a difference-in-differences approach with multiple periods. Our results indicate that inclusion in the HBP-CPU led to a substantial increase in utilization and access, particularly in remote areas, but had mixed effects on expenditures. While the number of unique users and prescription frequency rose significantly, the cost per user remained stable for procedures but increased for medications, likely due to higher demand and market structures. These findings suggest that although periodic HBP updates enhance access and effective coverage, they do not necessarily generate cost savings. Strengthening health technology assessment processes, integrating price regulation policies, and implementing cost-containment mechanisms are essential for ensuring the financial sustainability of health systems that regularly update benefit plans.
{"title":"The impact of periodic updates to health benefits plan: access gains without cost savings?","authors":"Oscar Espinosa, Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes, Jhonathan Rodríguez, Diego Ávila, Sergio Basto, Giancarlo Romano, Lorena Mesa, Hernán Enríquez","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09394-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09394-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Expanding explicit Health Benefit Plans (HBP) is a key strategy for achieving universal health coverage while maintaining financial sustainability. However, little is known about the broader effects of periodic updates to these plans on healthcare utilization, expenditures, and market dynamics. This study examines the impact of including new health technologies in Colombia's HBP covered by the Capitation Payment Unit (CPU) between 2012 and 2019, using administrative data and a difference-in-differences approach with multiple periods. Our results indicate that inclusion in the HBP-CPU led to a substantial increase in utilization and access, particularly in remote areas, but had mixed effects on expenditures. While the number of unique users and prescription frequency rose significantly, the cost per user remained stable for procedures but increased for medications, likely due to higher demand and market structures. These findings suggest that although periodic HBP updates enhance access and effective coverage, they do not necessarily generate cost savings. Strengthening health technology assessment processes, integrating price regulation policies, and implementing cost-containment mechanisms are essential for ensuring the financial sustainability of health systems that regularly update benefit plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"317-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12568849/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144040686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-19DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09395-6
Sukampon Chongwilaikasaem, Eva Ayaragarnchanakul, Chaleampong Kongcharoen, Chalermpat Pongajarn, Jürgen Rehm
Alcohol deregulation has recently been a topic of debate in Thailand, with policymakers weighing the potential economic benefits against public health harms and social concerns. This study estimates the impact on alcohol consumption levels in Thailand if barriers to producing alcoholic beverages are removed. Since the deregulation has not yet been implemented, we employed a randomized survey design for a Volumetric Choice Experiment administered to 1220 individuals, both drinkers and non-drinkers. The "treatment" group (with deregulation) was compared to the "control" group (without deregulation). While respondents in the control group were presented with existing drinks supplied by large producers, respondents in the treatment group were presented with new drinks supplied by small local producers alongside the existing options. Deregulation would introduce a wider variety of drinks, including cheaper local craft beer, white spirits, and brown spirits. Various scenarios of product availability and pricing were validated by experts. Our analysis reveals a 19.93% rise in total annual alcohol per capita consumption (APC), with a statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups at a 90% confidence level. Further exploration into cross-price elasticities of demand suggests new drinks would partly substitute current options. Policymakers should carefully consider the public health implications, including increased risks of alcohol-related harms, as well as potential economic benefits from market liberalization. Regulatory measures, such as taxation, age restrictions, and public awareness campaigns, may be necessary to mitigate the projected consumption increase and associated social costs.
{"title":"The predicted impact of the proposed alcohol production deregulation policy on consumption in Thailand.","authors":"Sukampon Chongwilaikasaem, Eva Ayaragarnchanakul, Chaleampong Kongcharoen, Chalermpat Pongajarn, Jürgen Rehm","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09395-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09395-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol deregulation has recently been a topic of debate in Thailand, with policymakers weighing the potential economic benefits against public health harms and social concerns. This study estimates the impact on alcohol consumption levels in Thailand if barriers to producing alcoholic beverages are removed. Since the deregulation has not yet been implemented, we employed a randomized survey design for a Volumetric Choice Experiment administered to 1220 individuals, both drinkers and non-drinkers. The \"treatment\" group (with deregulation) was compared to the \"control\" group (without deregulation). While respondents in the control group were presented with existing drinks supplied by large producers, respondents in the treatment group were presented with new drinks supplied by small local producers alongside the existing options. Deregulation would introduce a wider variety of drinks, including cheaper local craft beer, white spirits, and brown spirits. Various scenarios of product availability and pricing were validated by experts. Our analysis reveals a 19.93% rise in total annual alcohol per capita consumption (APC), with a statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups at a 90% confidence level. Further exploration into cross-price elasticities of demand suggests new drinks would partly substitute current options. Policymakers should carefully consider the public health implications, including increased risks of alcohol-related harms, as well as potential economic benefits from market liberalization. Regulatory measures, such as taxation, age restrictions, and public awareness campaigns, may be necessary to mitigate the projected consumption increase and associated social costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"271-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143658270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-01-22DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09391-w
J Krishna Nair, Pulak Mishra
Public expenditure for the improvement of maternal health is crucial in addressing the major social and demographic challenges in developing countries like India. Accordingly, the Government of India initiated the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in 2005 as a flagship conditional cash transfer scheme to encourage institutional delivery in the country. While the provisions under the JSY remain uniform throughout the country, there are apprehensions that the impact would differ across the states as well as between the rural and urban setups depending on varied socio-economic conditions and local level dynamics. Besides, households' choice of the type of institution (i.e., government versus private healthcare centres) may also change following the implementation of the JSY. This paper examines these two critical but interrelated aspects. Using secondary data compiled mainly from the last two rounds of the National Family Health Survey and estimating panel data econometric models, the paper finds that interactions with health facilitators during pregnancy, and per capita income contribute positively to the increase in institutional delivery in India irrespective of whether the households are located in rural or urban areas. Importantly, the paper does not find any significant role of the JSY in this regard. On the contrary, the JSY encourages households to prefer public to private hospitals in both rural and urban areas, whereas preference for private hospitals is positively associated with the household head literacy rate in urban area and health insurance coverage and per capita income in rural areas. The findings suggest greater emphasis on quality enhancement of the government healthcare centres. Besides, active engagement of the health workers should also be encouraged, particularly in mobilising the community towards institutional delivery and linking them effectively with the related initiatives of the government.
{"title":"Demand side financing for promoting institutional delivery: experiences of Janani Suraksha Yojana in Indian states.","authors":"J Krishna Nair, Pulak Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09391-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09391-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public expenditure for the improvement of maternal health is crucial in addressing the major social and demographic challenges in developing countries like India. Accordingly, the Government of India initiated the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in 2005 as a flagship conditional cash transfer scheme to encourage institutional delivery in the country. While the provisions under the JSY remain uniform throughout the country, there are apprehensions that the impact would differ across the states as well as between the rural and urban setups depending on varied socio-economic conditions and local level dynamics. Besides, households' choice of the type of institution (i.e., government versus private healthcare centres) may also change following the implementation of the JSY. This paper examines these two critical but interrelated aspects. Using secondary data compiled mainly from the last two rounds of the National Family Health Survey and estimating panel data econometric models, the paper finds that interactions with health facilitators during pregnancy, and per capita income contribute positively to the increase in institutional delivery in India irrespective of whether the households are located in rural or urban areas. Importantly, the paper does not find any significant role of the JSY in this regard. On the contrary, the JSY encourages households to prefer public to private hospitals in both rural and urban areas, whereas preference for private hospitals is positively associated with the household head literacy rate in urban area and health insurance coverage and per capita income in rural areas. The findings suggest greater emphasis on quality enhancement of the government healthcare centres. Besides, active engagement of the health workers should also be encouraged, particularly in mobilising the community towards institutional delivery and linking them effectively with the related initiatives of the government.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"245-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143013800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-19DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09390-x
Jeannette Brosig-Koch, Mona Groß, Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Nadja Kairies-Schwarz, Daniel Wiesen
How performance pay affects physicians' medical service provision and the quality of care is relevant for researchers and policy-makers alike. This paper systematically studies how performance pay, complementing either fee-for-service or capitation, affects physicians' medical service provision and the quality of care for heterogeneous patients. Using a series of controlled behavioral experiments with physicians and students, we test the incentive effect of performance pay at a within-subject level. We consider a performance pay scheme which grants a discrete bonus if a quality threshold is reached, which varies with the patients' severity of illness. We find that performance pay significantly reduces non-optimal service provision and enhances the quality of care. Effect sizes depend on the patients' severity of illness and whether performance pay is blended with fee-for-service or capitation. Health policy implications, including a cost benefit analysis of introducing performance pay, are discussed.
{"title":"Physicians' incentives, patients' characteristics, and quality of care: a systematic experimental comparison of performance-pay systems.","authors":"Jeannette Brosig-Koch, Mona Groß, Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Nadja Kairies-Schwarz, Daniel Wiesen","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09390-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09390-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How performance pay affects physicians' medical service provision and the quality of care is relevant for researchers and policy-makers alike. This paper systematically studies how performance pay, complementing either fee-for-service or capitation, affects physicians' medical service provision and the quality of care for heterogeneous patients. Using a series of controlled behavioral experiments with physicians and students, we test the incentive effect of performance pay at a within-subject level. We consider a performance pay scheme which grants a discrete bonus if a quality threshold is reached, which varies with the patients' severity of illness. We find that performance pay significantly reduces non-optimal service provision and enhances the quality of care. Effect sizes depend on the patients' severity of illness and whether performance pay is blended with fee-for-service or capitation. Health policy implications, including a cost benefit analysis of introducing performance pay, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"217-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-16DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09396-5
Boris Kaiser, Andreas Kohler, Christian P R Schmid
The expansion of public health insurance programs affects payers as well as the behavior of service providers. In this paper, we study the expansion of Swiss mandatory health insurance in 2012 to include complementary and alternative medicine physician services. The policy change provides a quasi-experimental design that allows us to estimate the causal effects on the payer and physician behavior using a difference-in-differences framework. First, we find that from the payer's perspective, expanding coverage to complementary and alternative medicine increases physician costs per patient by about 7 percent. Second, we find that the increase in physician service costs per patient in mandatory health insurance is almost exactly offset by a decrease in supplementary health insurance costs. Thus, suggesting that the behavior of physicians was unchanged by the coverage expansion.
{"title":"The causal effects of mandatory health insurance coverage expansion in Switzerland.","authors":"Boris Kaiser, Andreas Kohler, Christian P R Schmid","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09396-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09396-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expansion of public health insurance programs affects payers as well as the behavior of service providers. In this paper, we study the expansion of Swiss mandatory health insurance in 2012 to include complementary and alternative medicine physician services. The policy change provides a quasi-experimental design that allows us to estimate the causal effects on the payer and physician behavior using a difference-in-differences framework. First, we find that from the payer's perspective, expanding coverage to complementary and alternative medicine increases physician costs per patient by about 7 percent. Second, we find that the increase in physician service costs per patient in mandatory health insurance is almost exactly offset by a decrease in supplementary health insurance costs. Thus, suggesting that the behavior of physicians was unchanged by the coverage expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"193-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361299/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09392-9
Kaan Celebi, Jochen Hartwig, Anna Pauliina Sandqvist
Baumol's (Am Econ Rev 57: 415-426, 1967) model of 'unbalanced growth' yields a supply-side explanation for the 'cost explosion' in health care. Applying a testing strategy suggested by Hartwig (J Health Econ 27: 603-623, 2008), a sprawling literature affirms that the 'Baumol effect' has both a statistically and economically significant impact on health care expenditure growth. Skeptics maintain, however, that the proliferation of hi-tech medicine in acute care is clearly at odds with the assumption underlying Baumol's model that productivity-enhancing machinery and equipment is only installed in the 'progressive' (i.e. manufacturing) sector of the economy. They argue that Baumol's cost disease may affect long-term care, but not acute care. Our aim in this paper is to test whether Baumol's cost disease affects long-term care and acute care differently. Our testing strategy consists in combining Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) with an outlier-robust MM estimator. Using panel data for 23 OECD countries, our results provide robust and statistically significant evidence that expenditures on both acute care and long-term care are driven by Baumol's cost disease, even though the effect on long-term care expenditures is more pronounced.
{"title":"Baumol's cost disease in acute versus long-term care: Do the differences loom large?","authors":"Kaan Celebi, Jochen Hartwig, Anna Pauliina Sandqvist","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09392-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09392-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Baumol's (Am Econ Rev 57: 415-426, 1967) model of 'unbalanced growth' yields a supply-side explanation for the 'cost explosion' in health care. Applying a testing strategy suggested by Hartwig (J Health Econ 27: 603-623, 2008), a sprawling literature affirms that the 'Baumol effect' has both a statistically and economically significant impact on health care expenditure growth. Skeptics maintain, however, that the proliferation of hi-tech medicine in acute care is clearly at odds with the assumption underlying Baumol's model that productivity-enhancing machinery and equipment is only installed in the 'progressive' (i.e. manufacturing) sector of the economy. They argue that Baumol's cost disease may affect long-term care, but not acute care. Our aim in this paper is to test whether Baumol's cost disease affects long-term care and acute care differently. Our testing strategy consists in combining Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) with an outlier-robust MM estimator. Using panel data for 23 OECD countries, our results provide robust and statistically significant evidence that expenditures on both acute care and long-term care are driven by Baumol's cost disease, even though the effect on long-term care expenditures is more pronounced.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"159-191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z
Viktoria Szenkurök, Daniela Weber, Marcel Bilger
The rising number of older adults with limitations in their daily activities has major implications for the demands placed on long-term care (LTC) systems across Europe. Recognizing that demand can be both constrained and encouraged by individual and country-specific factors, this study explains the uptake of home-based long-term care in 18 European countries with LTC policies and pension generosity along with individual factors such as socioeconomic status. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe conducted in 2019, we apply a two-part multilevel model to assess if disparities in use of LTC are driven by disparities in needs or disparities in use of care when in need. While individual characteristics largely affect the use of care through its association with disparities in need, country-level characteristics are important for the use of care when in need. In particular, the better health of wealthier and more educated individuals makes them less likely to use any type of home-based personal care. At the country level, results show that the absence of a means-tested benefit scheme and the availability of cash-for-care benefits (as opposed to in-kind) are strongly associated with the use of formal care, whether it is mixed (with informal care) or exclusive. LTC policies are, however, shown to be insufficient to significantly reduce unmet needs for personal care. Conversely, generous pensions are significantly associated with lower unmet needs, underscoring the importance of considering the likely adverse effects of future pension reforms.
{"title":"Informal and formal long-term care utilization and unmet needs in Europe: examining socioeconomic disparities and the role of social policies for older adults.","authors":"Viktoria Szenkurök, Daniela Weber, Marcel Bilger","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising number of older adults with limitations in their daily activities has major implications for the demands placed on long-term care (LTC) systems across Europe. Recognizing that demand can be both constrained and encouraged by individual and country-specific factors, this study explains the uptake of home-based long-term care in 18 European countries with LTC policies and pension generosity along with individual factors such as socioeconomic status. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe conducted in 2019, we apply a two-part multilevel model to assess if disparities in use of LTC are driven by disparities in needs or disparities in use of care when in need. While individual characteristics largely affect the use of care through its association with disparities in need, country-level characteristics are important for the use of care when in need. In particular, the better health of wealthier and more educated individuals makes them less likely to use any type of home-based personal care. At the country level, results show that the absence of a means-tested benefit scheme and the availability of cash-for-care benefits (as opposed to in-kind) are strongly associated with the use of formal care, whether it is mixed (with informal care) or exclusive. LTC policies are, however, shown to be insufficient to significantly reduce unmet needs for personal care. Conversely, generous pensions are significantly associated with lower unmet needs, underscoring the importance of considering the likely adverse effects of future pension reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"87-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003520/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141077158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1007/s10754-024-09387-y
Giorgio Matteucci, Daniele De Santis
To assess the impact on pharmaceutical wholesalers' financial viability and efficiency of the reform of the wholesalers' and pharmacies' margins on reimbursable drugs enacted in 2010 that halved the distributors' margins. We perform a stochastic frontier analysis on a large original dataset comprising financial and production data from 2009, a year prior to the reform, to 2019 gathered in order to assess the impact of the reform on firms' profitability and efficiency. The implemented policies have not been successful in fostering the development of a more efficient market that would ultimately benefit social welfare. Overall, our findings indicate that bigger firms lag behind their smaller counterparts in terms of efficiency, even in the long run. Our findings also suggest that an efficient pharmaceutical wholesaler is currently unable to generate normal profit from the distribution of reimbursable drugs. Compared to the other European countries, that seem to have a cost oriented approach, Italy provides one of the lowest margins to pharmaceutical wholesalers without properly considering the costs of the drugs' distribution. A new regulatory approach to wholesaling margins is needed in order to improve efficiency and welfare.
{"title":"The pharmaceutical distributors' efficiency in Italy: an assessment of the impact of the 2010 reimbursable drug pricing reform.","authors":"Giorgio Matteucci, Daniele De Santis","doi":"10.1007/s10754-024-09387-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-024-09387-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the impact on pharmaceutical wholesalers' financial viability and efficiency of the reform of the wholesalers' and pharmacies' margins on reimbursable drugs enacted in 2010 that halved the distributors' margins. We perform a stochastic frontier analysis on a large original dataset comprising financial and production data from 2009, a year prior to the reform, to 2019 gathered in order to assess the impact of the reform on firms' profitability and efficiency. The implemented policies have not been successful in fostering the development of a more efficient market that would ultimately benefit social welfare. Overall, our findings indicate that bigger firms lag behind their smaller counterparts in terms of efficiency, even in the long run. Our findings also suggest that an efficient pharmaceutical wholesaler is currently unable to generate normal profit from the distribution of reimbursable drugs. Compared to the other European countries, that seem to have a cost oriented approach, Italy provides one of the lowest margins to pharmaceutical wholesalers without properly considering the costs of the drugs' distribution. A new regulatory approach to wholesaling margins is needed in order to improve efficiency and welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s10754-025-09389-4
Patricia Moreno-Mencia, Ana Fernández-Sainz, Juan M Rodríguez-Póo
Depression is a common disorder that impacts on individuals' ability to perform daily activities, including those required for working. People with poor health tend to have problems needing medical care and therefore need time away from their work. This paper considers a structural model of labor absenteeism, considering the effect of depression. Our objective is to estimate the effects that depressive symptoms (among other factors) have on absenteeism while avoiding inconsistency in estimators due to sample selection and endogenous regressor. We are unwilling to impose strong assumptions, which are sometimes not required by theory, so our model is semiparametric. Based on microdata from the European Health Survey in Spain, our results indicate that depressive symptoms have a negative effect on working time and increase absenteeism. We conclude that depressed workers lose on average around 12 more days per year than non depressed ones. Levels of absenteeism are also estimated to be higher on average among obese people and among older people (the effect of age is positive). On the other hand, non-college education, being male and being self-employed are factors related to lower levels of absenteeism.
{"title":"Do depressive symptoms influence nonattendance at work? A semiparametric approach.","authors":"Patricia Moreno-Mencia, Ana Fernández-Sainz, Juan M Rodríguez-Póo","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09389-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10754-025-09389-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression is a common disorder that impacts on individuals' ability to perform daily activities, including those required for working. People with poor health tend to have problems needing medical care and therefore need time away from their work. This paper considers a structural model of labor absenteeism, considering the effect of depression. Our objective is to estimate the effects that depressive symptoms (among other factors) have on absenteeism while avoiding inconsistency in estimators due to sample selection and endogenous regressor. We are unwilling to impose strong assumptions, which are sometimes not required by theory, so our model is semiparametric. Based on microdata from the European Health Survey in Spain, our results indicate that depressive symptoms have a negative effect on working time and increase absenteeism. We conclude that depressed workers lose on average around 12 more days per year than non depressed ones. Levels of absenteeism are also estimated to be higher on average among obese people and among older people (the effect of age is positive). On the other hand, non-college education, being male and being self-employed are factors related to lower levels of absenteeism.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":"67-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003569/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}