{"title":"Robert, AIDS, and Infectious Sympathy: I Remember When There Was Nothing Medicine Could Do.","authors":"Rebecca Garden","doi":"10.1353/lm.2025.a975541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975541","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"43 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the world of medicine, shame's potential is ever-present and attempts to keep it at bay may only induce it all the more intensely. In this short story by the often-anthologized physician-writer Richard Selzer, the narrator witnesses a surgery to repair a young girl's cleft palate that leads to her untimely death. Later, the narrator realizes that the surgeon performed reconstructive surgery on the girl's corpse. Arguably, the surgeon has attempted not only to repair the girl's face, but to preserve his own social face from shame as well. And while the narrator may want to absolve the surgeon from such a dubious act, in doing so he reveals his own shameful complicity. Selzer's short story thus demonstrates how shame is transitive, an affect that crosses borders and saturates all those who come into its contact.
{"title":"The Transitivity of Shame: Richard Selzer's \"Imelda\".","authors":"Douglas Dowland","doi":"10.1353/lm.2025.a975547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975547","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the world of medicine, shame's potential is ever-present and attempts to keep it at bay may only induce it all the more intensely. In this short story by the often-anthologized physician-writer Richard Selzer, the narrator witnesses a surgery to repair a young girl's cleft palate that leads to her untimely death. Later, the narrator realizes that the surgeon performed reconstructive surgery on the girl's corpse. Arguably, the surgeon has attempted not only to repair the girl's face, but to preserve his own social face from shame as well. And while the narrator may want to absolve the surgeon from such a dubious act, in doing so he reveals his own shameful complicity. Selzer's short story thus demonstrates how shame is transitive, an affect that crosses borders and saturates all those who come into its contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"43 1","pages":"134-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this essay, I explore how Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's A Dialogue on Love and Kate Zambreno's To Write as If Already Dead contest the relationship between illness and shame through their renegotiation of the confessional form. Both memoirs, in their incorporation of other authorial positions ranging from case notes to novels, address an interlocutor, whose presence halts the circulation of shame. Consequently, I argue that Sedgwick and Zambreno enact a kind of reparative reading within their memoirs' form, and I trace how the relationality of their works moves towards repairing the harms of medicalized shame. Counter to current debates around post-critique and the method wars, I discuss how Sedgwick and Zambreno's memoirs model their own reading practice within their pages, a practice that is inextricable from their understanding of shame and illness.
{"title":"Less a Method than a Form: Repairing Shame and Illness in Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Kate Zambreno.","authors":"Chloe R Green","doi":"10.1353/lm.2025.a975549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975549","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this essay, I explore how Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's A Dialogue on Love and Kate Zambreno's To Write as If Already Dead contest the relationship between illness and shame through their renegotiation of the confessional form. Both memoirs, in their incorporation of other authorial positions ranging from case notes to novels, address an interlocutor, whose presence halts the circulation of shame. Consequently, I argue that Sedgwick and Zambreno enact a kind of reparative reading within their memoirs' form, and I trace how the relationality of their works moves towards repairing the harms of medicalized shame. Counter to current debates around post-critique and the method wars, I discuss how Sedgwick and Zambreno's memoirs model their own reading practice within their pages, a practice that is inextricable from their understanding of shame and illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"43 1","pages":"177-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
U.S. medical series have, since 1975, regularly integrated guest transgender characters as patients but limit patient and doctor interactions to problems caused by or related to their medical transition. An analysis of more than 18 different U.S. scripted medical dramas series aired between 1975 to 2018 demonstrates how the professional authority of the main characters often validates the character's gender dysphoria, but the narrative questions the validity of its presumed solution (gender transition) and delegitimizes the outcome (gender identity as a basis of gender instead of one's sex). These series do so by presenting the distinction between the sex (as assigned at birth) and gender identity of trans guest characters as so significant that attempts to prioritize the latter over the former, or hide its existence, are characterized as shameful and associate gender transition with deception and selfishness, thereby contributing to current transphobic debates across the United States.
{"title":"The Shame of Being Trans: Transgender Patients and Cisgender Doctors in U.S. Medical Dramas.","authors":"Traci B Abbott","doi":"10.1353/lm.2025.a975551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975551","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>U.S. medical series have, since 1975, regularly integrated guest transgender characters as patients but limit patient and doctor interactions to problems caused by or related to their medical transition. An analysis of more than 18 different U.S. scripted medical dramas series aired between 1975 to 2018 demonstrates how the professional authority of the main characters often validates the character's gender dysphoria, but the narrative questions the validity of its presumed solution (gender transition) and delegitimizes the outcome (gender identity as a basis of gender instead of one's sex). These series do so by presenting the distinction between the sex (as assigned at birth) and gender identity of trans guest characters as so significant that attempts to prioritize the latter over the former, or hide its existence, are characterized as shameful and associate gender transition with deception and selfishness, thereby contributing to current transphobic debates across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"43 1","pages":"219-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shame is a temporally sensitive emotion highly relevant to the healthcare context and culturally inscribed within medical education in the United States and United Kingdom. Drawing from feminist, phenomenological, and queer of color conceptions of time and shame, this essay uses narratology to analyze popular medical memoirs of medical training. I propose two primary modes of time within medical training-a linear time and a future-oriented time-and map them onto chronic and acute shame experiences as represented in medical memoirs. Anecdotes from these memoirs suggest both the challenges of medical training and potential opportunities for reshaping the training narrative to better support diverse student experiences and turn the system towards shame-sensitive, humanistic patient care.
{"title":"Training through Shame: Affect and Temporality in Medical Education.","authors":"Penelope Lusk","doi":"10.1353/lm.2025.a975544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shame is a temporally sensitive emotion highly relevant to the healthcare context and culturally inscribed within medical education in the United States and United Kingdom. Drawing from feminist, phenomenological, and queer of color conceptions of time and shame, this essay uses narratology to analyze popular medical memoirs of medical training. I propose two primary modes of time within medical training-a linear time and a future-oriented time-and map them onto chronic and acute shame experiences as represented in medical memoirs. Anecdotes from these memoirs suggest both the challenges of medical training and potential opportunities for reshaping the training narrative to better support diverse student experiences and turn the system towards shame-sensitive, humanistic patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"43 1","pages":"75-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alice Hattrick's Ill Feelings (2021) is a "genre-bending" long-form essay; its title's dual meaning underlines the entanglement of symptoms and shame that occur when illness is seen as having no explanation. This paper brings Ill Feelings into dialogue with a spoken account of unexplained illness to illuminate the distinct ways in which it shapes both lives and texts. The shame that occurs for those living with "ill feelings" is characterized by a sense of (in)visibility: by feeling simultaneously seen and unseen. I investigate how diagnostic labels employed in these contexts render suffering and sufferers (in)visible, and illuminate how fusing genres offers Hattrick a particular form of (controlled) visibility. Finally, I consider the implications of this analysis for our broader understanding of shame, and for our approach to literary life writing.
{"title":"Shame, (In)visibility, and <i>Ill Feelings</i>.","authors":"Katharine Cheston","doi":"10.1353/lm.2025.a975548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alice Hattrick's Ill Feelings (2021) is a \"genre-bending\" long-form essay; its title's dual meaning underlines the entanglement of symptoms and shame that occur when illness is seen as having no explanation. This paper brings Ill Feelings into dialogue with a spoken account of unexplained illness to illuminate the distinct ways in which it shapes both lives and texts. The shame that occurs for those living with \"ill feelings\" is characterized by a sense of (in)visibility: by feeling simultaneously seen and unseen. I investigate how diagnostic labels employed in these contexts render suffering and sufferers (in)visible, and illuminate how fusing genres offers Hattrick a particular form of (controlled) visibility. Finally, I consider the implications of this analysis for our broader understanding of shame, and for our approach to literary life writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"43 1","pages":"153-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}