Pub Date : 2023-08-29DOI: 10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.240
Alena Plháková
Recenze na knihu Psychoanalytická psychoterapie stručně shrnuje obsah jejích jednotlivých kapitol. Recenzentka se pokusila zhodnotit přednosti knihy a upozornit na některá její diskutabilní místa.
{"title":"N. McWilliams: Psychoanalytická psychoterapie. Příručka pro praxi.","authors":"Alena Plháková","doi":"10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.240","url":null,"abstract":"Recenze na knihu Psychoanalytická psychoterapie stručně shrnuje obsah jejích jednotlivých kapitol. Recenzentka se pokusila zhodnotit přednosti knihy a upozornit na některá její diskutabilní místa. ","PeriodicalId":44544,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska Psychologie","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136282841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-29DOI: 10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.192
Henrieta Ševčíková, Barbara Lášticová
Pitfalls of multiple social categorization and intersectionality research: Possibilities and limits Social psychology and research on intergroup relations has long been dominated by an approach that favoured comparisons between one ingroup and one outgroup, ignoring the possible membership of the same person in multiple social categories. Research on multiple categorical membership and intersectionality is so far absent in Czech and Slovak social psychology. The main objective of this review is to present the theories, approaches and models through which international social psychologists have approached the investigation of the aforementioned concepts. The paper discusses their strengths and weaknesses and then formulates recommendations for further research in this area, with particular emphasis on intergroup relations in the Slovak context. V sociálnej psychológii a vo výskume medziskupinových vzťahov dlho dominoval prístup, ktorý uprednostňoval porovnania medzi jednou členskou a jednou nečlenskou skupinou, pričom ignoroval možnú príslušnosť jednej a tej istej osoby k viacerým sociálnym kategóriám. Výskumy týkajúce sa viacnásobného kategoriálneho členstva a s tým spojenej intersekcionality v našom výskumnom priestore zatiaľ absentujú. Hlavným cieľom tejto prehľadovej štúdie je predstaviť teórie, prístupy a modely, prostredníctvom ktorých zahraniční sociálni psychológovia a psychologičky pristupujú k skúmaniu spomínaných konceptov. V príspevku autorky diskutujú o ich silných a slabých stránkach a následne formulujú odporúčania pre ďalší výskum v tejto oblasti, s osobitným dôrazom na medziskupinové vzťahy v slovenskom kontexte.
长期以来，社会心理学和群体间关系研究一直被一种倾向于比较一个内群体和一个外群体的方法所主导，忽视了同一个人在多个社会类别中的可能成员身份。在捷克和斯洛伐克的社会心理学中，对多重分类成员和交叉性的研究迄今为止是缺席的。本综述的主要目的是介绍国际社会心理学家研究上述概念的理论、方法和模型。该文件讨论了它们的长处和短处，然后为这一领域的进一步研究提出建议，特别强调斯洛伐克背景下的群体间关系。V sociálnej psychológii a vo výskume medziskupinových vzťahov dlho dominoval prístup, ktorý uprednostňoval porovnania medzi jednou lenskou a jednou ne lenskou skupinou, pri om ignoroval možnú príslušnosť jednej a tej istej osoby k viacerým sociálnym kategóriám。Výskumy týkajúce sa viacnásobného kategoriálneho lenstva a s tým spojenej interseciality v našom výskumnom priestore zatiakov absentujú。Hlavným cieľom tejto prehľadovej štúdie je predstaviv teórie, prístupy a模态，prostredníctvom ktorých zahraniční sociálni psychológovia a心理学 pristupujú k skúmaniu spomínaných概念。V príspevku autorky diskutujú o ich silných a slabých stránkach a následne formulujú odporúčania pre ďalší výskum V tejto oblasti, s osobitným dôrazom na medziskupinov vzťahy V slovenskom kontexte。
{"title":"Úskalia skúmania viacnásobnej sociálnej kategorizácie a intersekcionality: možnosti a limity","authors":"Henrieta Ševčíková, Barbara Lášticová","doi":"10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.192","url":null,"abstract":"Pitfalls of multiple social categorization and intersectionality research: Possibilities and limits Social psychology and research on intergroup relations has long been dominated by an approach that favoured comparisons between one ingroup and one outgroup, ignoring the possible membership of the same person in multiple social categories. Research on multiple categorical membership and intersectionality is so far absent in Czech and Slovak social psychology. The main objective of this review is to present the theories, approaches and models through which international social psychologists have approached the investigation of the aforementioned concepts. The paper discusses their strengths and weaknesses and then formulates recommendations for further research in this area, with particular emphasis on intergroup relations in the Slovak context. V sociálnej psychológii a vo výskume medziskupinových vzťahov dlho dominoval prístup, ktorý uprednostňoval porovnania medzi jednou členskou a jednou nečlenskou skupinou, pričom ignoroval možnú príslušnosť jednej a tej istej osoby k viacerým sociálnym kategóriám. Výskumy týkajúce sa viacnásobného kategoriálneho členstva a s tým spojenej intersekcionality v našom výskumnom priestore zatiaľ absentujú. Hlavným cieľom tejto prehľadovej štúdie je predstaviť teórie, prístupy a modely, prostredníctvom ktorých zahraniční sociálni psychológovia a psychologičky pristupujú k skúmaniu spomínaných konceptov. V príspevku autorky diskutujú o ich silných a slabých stránkach a následne formulujú odporúčania pre ďalší výskum v tejto oblasti, s osobitným dôrazom na medziskupinové vzťahy v slovenskom kontexte.","PeriodicalId":44544,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska Psychologie","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136282839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-29DOI: 10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.179
Boban Nedeljković, Lana Tucaković, Jana Dimoski
Objectives. Understanding the relationship between the time perspectives and the Dark Tetrad can shed light on some of the mechanisms underlying these personality traits, and exploring potential sex differences in these relationships can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the Dark Tetrad and its implications for both males and females. The previous studies produced valuable knowledge on the relationships between different time perspectives and the Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism), but they mainly neglected sex differences and have not considered sadism. This study aimed to explore Dark Tetrad and time perspectives association in males and females separately.Sample and settings. The sample included 350 participants (170 males and 180 females, aged 18 to 69) who completed the Short Dark Triad, the direct sadism scale from Varieties of Sadistic Tendencies, and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory.Hypotheses. It was assumed that Dark Tetrad traits would relate positively with the present-time perspectives in both sexes but stronger in males.Statistical analyses. After exploring the correlations at the baseline level, sex differences were examined by moderation analysis, followed by separate multiple regressions for both sexes.Results. The Dark Tetrad traits were mainly associated with present orientation in both sexes, with differences based on participants’ sex. Narcissism was more strongly related to the present hedonistic perspective in females, and psychopathy more strongly to the present fatalistic in males. Notably, sadism exhibited striking differences. In males, sadism was only related to the present fatalistic perspective, whereas in females, it was associated with present-hedonistic and past negative perspectives. This study provided initial insights into the time perspective of sadism, highlighting a potentially greater role of negative early-life experiences in females.Limitations. Sample characteristics, correlational design, single-measure dark traits assessment, and the lack of early-life events measure were discussed.
{"title":"The time perspectives of the dark tetrad in males and females: Preliminary findings of sex differences in sadism","authors":"Boban Nedeljković, Lana Tucaković, Jana Dimoski","doi":"10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.179","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. Understanding the relationship between the time perspectives and the Dark Tetrad can shed light on some of the mechanisms underlying these personality traits, and exploring potential sex differences in these relationships can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the Dark Tetrad and its implications for both males and females. The previous studies produced valuable knowledge on the relationships between different time perspectives and the Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism), but they mainly neglected sex differences and have not considered sadism. This study aimed to explore Dark Tetrad and time perspectives association in males and females separately.Sample and settings. The sample included 350 participants (170 males and 180 females, aged 18 to 69) who completed the Short Dark Triad, the direct sadism scale from Varieties of Sadistic Tendencies, and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory.Hypotheses. It was assumed that Dark Tetrad traits would relate positively with the present-time perspectives in both sexes but stronger in males.Statistical analyses. After exploring the correlations at the baseline level, sex differences were examined by moderation analysis, followed by separate multiple regressions for both sexes.Results. The Dark Tetrad traits were mainly associated with present orientation in both sexes, with differences based on participants’ sex. Narcissism was more strongly related to the present hedonistic perspective in females, and psychopathy more strongly to the present fatalistic in males. Notably, sadism exhibited striking differences. In males, sadism was only related to the present fatalistic perspective, whereas in females, it was associated with present-hedonistic and past negative perspectives. This study provided initial insights into the time perspective of sadism, highlighting a potentially greater role of negative early-life experiences in females.Limitations. Sample characteristics, correlational design, single-measure dark traits assessment, and the lack of early-life events measure were discussed.","PeriodicalId":44544,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska Psychologie","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136282840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-29DOI: 10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.230
Michal Zvírotský
Specifics of the Schultz autogenic training method: possible reasons of its untapped potential The paper deals with the Schultz autogenic training method, which, despite its effectiveness, safety and availability, is a relatively little used form of prevention and therapy of reactive conditions and psychological disorders. This fact seems paradoxical, especially in today’s times, in which psychotherapeutic and psychiatric care is relatively difficult for many people to access.The untapped potential of autogenic training may be caused by certain little known specifics, which the paper draws attention to, with the aim of recalling the proven method in a new light. The path to the renaissance of the method liesmainly in its new conceptualization as a method more psychagogical than psychotherapeutic, consistently autogenous, fully holistic, and yet scientifically completely relevant. Příspěvek se zabývá metodou Schultzova autogenního tréninku, která je přes svou účinnost, bezpečnost a dostupnost relativně málo využívanou formou prevence a terapie reaktivních stavů a psychických poruch. Tato skutečnost se jeví jako paradoxní, a to zejména v dnešní době, ve které je psychoterapeutická a psychiatrická péče pro mnoho lidí relativně obtížně dostupná. Příčinou nevyužitého potenciálu autogenního tréninku mohou být jeho určitá málo známá specifika, na která příspěvek upozorňuje, a to s cílem osvědčenou metodu připomenout v novém světle. Cesta k renesanci metody spočívá zejména v její nové konceptualizaci coby metody spíše psychagogické než psychoterapeutické, důsledně autogenní, plně holistické, a přitom vědecky naprosto relevantní.
舒尔茨自体训练法尽管有效、安全、可用，但在预防和治疗反应性疾病和心理障碍方面，它是一种相对较少使用的方法。这一事实似乎自相矛盾，尤其是在当今时代，心理治疗和精神科护理对许多人来说相对难以获得。自体训练尚未开发的潜力可能是由某些鲜为人知的细节引起的，本文提请注意，旨在以新的视角回顾已证明的方法。该方法的复兴之路主要在于其新的概念化，作为一种更心理学而不是心理治疗的方法，始终是自生的，完全整体的，但在科学上完全相关。Příspěvek se zabývá metodou Schultzova autogenního trsamuinku, kter je přes svou účinnost, bezpe nost a dostupnost relativnje málo využívanou formou prevention a terapie reaktivních stavlova psychických poruch。Tato skute nost se jeví jako paradoxní， ato zejmsamna v dnešní dobje, ve kter je psychoterapeutick a psychoricric p e promnoho lidí relativnje obtížně dostupn。Příčinou nevyužitého potenciálu autogenního trtrninku mohou být jeho ur it málo známá specifika, na kter příspěvek upozorňuje, a to s cílem osv denou metodu připomenout v novvsvitl。Cesta k renesanci metody spočívá zejm概念化的方法spočívá zejm概念化的方法spíše psychagogick nev psychoterapeutick， důsledně autogenní， plnje - holistick，一个přitom vjemadky napproto relevantní。
{"title":"Specifika metody Schultzova autogenního tréninku – možné příčiny jejího nevyužitého potenciálu","authors":"Michal Zvírotský","doi":"10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.230","url":null,"abstract":"Specifics of the Schultz autogenic training method: possible reasons of its untapped potential The paper deals with the Schultz autogenic training method, which, despite its effectiveness, safety and availability, is a relatively little used form of prevention and therapy of reactive conditions and psychological disorders. This fact seems paradoxical, especially in today’s times, in which psychotherapeutic and psychiatric care is relatively difficult for many people to access.The untapped potential of autogenic training may be caused by certain little known specifics, which the paper draws attention to, with the aim of recalling the proven method in a new light. The path to the renaissance of the method liesmainly in its new conceptualization as a method more psychagogical than psychotherapeutic, consistently autogenous, fully holistic, and yet scientifically completely relevant. Příspěvek se zabývá metodou Schultzova autogenního tréninku, která je přes svou účinnost, bezpečnost a dostupnost relativně málo využívanou formou prevence a terapie reaktivních stavů a psychických poruch. Tato skutečnost se jeví jako paradoxní, a to zejména v dnešní době, ve které je psychoterapeutická a psychiatrická péče pro mnoho lidí relativně obtížně dostupná. Příčinou nevyužitého potenciálu autogenního tréninku mohou být jeho určitá málo známá specifika, na která příspěvek upozorňuje, a to s cílem osvědčenou metodu připomenout v novém světle. Cesta k renesanci metody spočívá zejména v její nové konceptualizaci coby metody spíše psychagogické než psychoterapeutické, důsledně autogenní, plně holistické, a přitom vědecky naprosto relevantní.","PeriodicalId":44544,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska Psychologie","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136282842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：