Pub Date : 2017-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.001
Zhou Yuntao PT, MS , Izumi Kondo MD, PhD , Masahiko Mukaino MD, PhD , Shigeo Tanabe PT, PhD , Toshio Teranishi PT, PhD , Takuma Ii PT, MS , Kensuke Oono MS , Soichiro Koyama PT, PhD , Yoshikiyo Kanada PT, PhD , Eiichi Saitoh MD, PhD
Background
With the development of computer technology, computerized dynamic posturography provides objective assessments of balance and posture control under static and dynamic conditions. Although a force-instrumented treadmill-based balance assessment is feasible for balance evaluations, currently no data exists.
Objective
This study was undertaken to assess the reliability and validity of balance evaluations using a force-instrumented treadmill.
Methods
Ten healthy adults participated in evaluations using both the treadmill and the EquiTest. Four balance evaluations were conducted: Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, Unilateral Stance, Weight Bearing Squat, and Motor Control Test.
Results
All balance evaluations using the force-instrumented treadmill method shared good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.6). The Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, Unilateral Stance, and Weight Bearing Squat evaluations had a correlation of r < 0.5 with EquiTest, whereas the Motor Control Test balance evaluation had moderate correlations (r > 0.5) with the EquiTest.
Conclusion
The results demonstrated that all balance evaluations using the force-instrumented treadmill were reliable, and that the Motor Control Test evaluation was moderately correlated with the EquiTest. Therefore, the use of a force-instrumented treadmill in balance evaluations might provide a certain level of value to clinical practice.
{"title":"Reliability and validity of a force-instrumented treadmill for evaluating balance: A preliminary study of feasibility in healthy young adults","authors":"Zhou Yuntao PT, MS , Izumi Kondo MD, PhD , Masahiko Mukaino MD, PhD , Shigeo Tanabe PT, PhD , Toshio Teranishi PT, PhD , Takuma Ii PT, MS , Kensuke Oono MS , Soichiro Koyama PT, PhD , Yoshikiyo Kanada PT, PhD , Eiichi Saitoh MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the development of computer technology, computerized dynamic posturography provides objective assessments of balance and posture control under static and dynamic conditions. Although a force-instrumented treadmill-based balance assessment is feasible for balance evaluations, currently no data exists.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was undertaken to assess the reliability and validity of balance evaluations using a force-instrumented treadmill.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten healthy adults participated in evaluations using both the treadmill and the EquiTest. Four balance evaluations were conducted: Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, Unilateral Stance, Weight Bearing Squat, and Motor Control Test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All balance evaluations using the force-instrumented treadmill method shared good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.6). The Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, Unilateral Stance, and Weight Bearing Squat evaluations had a correlation of <em>r</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.5 with EquiTest, whereas the Motor Control Test balance evaluation had moderate correlations (<em>r</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.5) with the EquiTest.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results demonstrated that all balance evaluations using the force-instrumented treadmill were reliable, and that the Motor Control Test evaluation was moderately correlated with the EquiTest. Therefore, the use of a force-instrumented treadmill in balance evaluations might provide a certain level of value to clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37106276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001
Estêvão Rios Monteiro BSc , Andrew Vigotsky BSc , Jakob Škarabot MSc , Amanda Fernandes Brown MSc , Aline Gomes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza BSc , Thiago Matassoli Gomes MSc , Israel Halperin MSc , Jefferson da Silva Novaes PhD
Background
Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout.
Objective
This study investigated how different FR durations applied to the quadriceps during the interset rest periods affects the numbers of repetitions in the knee extension exercise.
Methods
Twenty-five females completed four sets of knee extensions with 10 repetitions of maximum load to concentric failure on four occasions. Between each set, a 4-minute rest interval was implemented in which participants either passively rested or performed FR for different durations (60 seconds, 90 seconds, and 120 seconds). The 95% confidence intervals revealed a dose-dependent relationship in which longer durations of FR resulted in fewer completed repetitions.
Results
On average, the number of repetitions with PR was 13.8% greater than that in FR120, 8.6% greater than that in FR90, and 9.1% greater than that in FR60.
Conclusion
For the purposes of performance and likely adaptation, interset FR seems to be detrimental to a person's ability to continually produce force, and should not be applied to the agonist muscle group between sets of knee extensions.
{"title":"Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance","authors":"Estêvão Rios Monteiro BSc , Andrew Vigotsky BSc , Jakob Škarabot MSc , Amanda Fernandes Brown MSc , Aline Gomes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza BSc , Thiago Matassoli Gomes MSc , Israel Halperin MSc , Jefferson da Silva Novaes PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated how different FR durations applied to the quadriceps during the interset rest periods affects the numbers of repetitions in the knee extension exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-five females completed four sets of knee extensions with 10 repetitions of maximum load to concentric failure on four occasions. Between each set, a 4-minute rest interval was implemented in which participants either passively rested or performed FR for different durations (60 seconds, 90 seconds, and 120 seconds). The 95% confidence intervals revealed a dose-dependent relationship in which longer durations of FR resulted in fewer completed repetitions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, the number of repetitions with PR was 13.8% greater than that in FR120, 8.6% greater than that in FR90, and 9.1% greater than that in FR60.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For the purposes of performance and likely adaptation, interset FR seems to be detrimental to a person's ability to continually produce force, and should not be applied to the agonist muscle group between sets of knee extensions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37106668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001
Huma Parveen, Majumi M. Noohu
Objective
The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale to measure balance and gait impairments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods
A convenient sample of 25 individuals with bilateral OA knee were recruited. The convergent validity was determined by correlation analysis between scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with balance subscale (POMA-B) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) with gait subscale (POMA-G). The intrarater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1)], the Bland–Altman plots limits of agreement (LOA), the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC) and ceiling/floor effects were determined.
Results
Score of BBS was significantly correlated with POMA-B scores, rs = 0.63, p = 0.001, whereas TUGT showed a negative correlation with POMA-G, rs = −0.481, p = 0.020, showing moderate convergent validity. ICC results of the total POMA scale (POMA-T), POMA-B, and POMA-G were 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, indicating high test retest reliability. SEM, for POMA-T, POMA-B, and POMA-G was 0.35, 0.27, and 0.35, respectively; MDC values were 0.97 for POMA-T, 0.75 for POMA-B, and 0.63 for POMA-G.
Conclusion
The findings indicate that the POMA is a valid and reliable tool to assess balance and gait impairments in people with OA knee.
目的本研究的目的是确定Tinetti性能导向活动能力评估(POMA)量表的心理测量特性,以测量膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的平衡和步态障碍。方法选取25例双侧OA膝关节患者作为方便样本。通过Berg平衡量表(BBS)与平衡子量表(POMA-B)和计时起跑测验(TUGT)与步态子量表(POMA-G)的相关分析来确定收敛效度。确定了内部信度[类内相关系数(ICC 3,1)]、Bland-Altman图一致限(LOA)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和天花板/地板效应。结果BBS评分与POMA-B评分呈显著相关(rs = 0.63, p = 0.001), TUGT与POMA-G评分呈负相关(rs = - 0.481, p = 0.020),具有中等收敛效度。总POMA量表(POMA- t)、POMA- b和POMA- g的ICC结果分别为0.96、0.93和0.96,表明测试重测信度较高。POMA-T、POMA-B和POMA-G的SEM分别为0.35、0.27和0.35;POMA-T的MDC值为0.97,POMA-B为0.75,POMA-G为0.63。结论研究结果表明,POMA是评估OA膝关节患者平衡和步态障碍的有效可靠工具。
{"title":"Evaluation of psychometric properties of Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment scale in subjects with knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Huma Parveen, Majumi M. Noohu","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale to measure balance and gait impairments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A convenient sample of 25 individuals with bilateral OA knee were recruited. The convergent validity was determined by correlation analysis between scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with balance subscale (POMA-B) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) with gait subscale (POMA-G). The intrarater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1)], the Bland–Altman plots limits of agreement (LOA), the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC) and ceiling/floor effects were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Score of BBS was significantly correlated with POMA-B scores, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.63, <em>p</em> = 0.001, whereas TUGT showed a negative correlation with POMA-G, r<sub>s</sub> = −0.481, <em>p</em> = 0.020, showing moderate convergent validity. ICC results of the total POMA scale (POMA-T), POMA-B, and POMA-G were 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, indicating high test retest reliability. SEM, for POMA-T, POMA-B, and POMA-G was 0.35, 0.27, and 0.35, respectively; MDC values were 0.97 for POMA-T, 0.75 for POMA-B, and 0.63 for POMA-G.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings indicate that the POMA is a valid and reliable tool to assess balance and gait impairments in people with OA knee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.07.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37106274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.09.001
Bryan Ping Ho Chung MSc in Health Care
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in improving functional outcomes among stroke patients.
Design
This was a retrospective matched control study.
Setting
This study was conducted in an extended inpatient rehabilitation centre.
Patients and intervention
There were 14 patients with subacute stroke (4–31 days after stroke) in the RAGT group. Apart from traditional physiotherapy, the RAGT group received RAGT. The number of sessions for RAGT ranged from five to 33, and the frequency was three to five sessions per week, with each session lasting for 15–30 minutes. In the control group, there were 27 subacute stroke patients who were matched with the RAGT group in terms of age, days since stroke, premorbid ambulatory level, functional outcomes at admission, length of training, and number of physiotherapy sessions received. The control group received traditional physiotherapy but not RAGT.
Outcome measures
Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC), Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI), Berg's Balance Scale (BBS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) to measure ambulation, mobility, balance, and activities of daily living, respectively.
Results
Both RAGT and control groups had significant within-group improvement in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI. However, the RAGT group had higher gain in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI than the control group. In addition, there were significant between-group differences in MFAC, MRMI, and BBS gains (p = 0.026, p = 0.010, and p = 0.042, respectively). There was no significant between-group difference (p = 0.597) in MBI gain (p = 0.597).
Conclusion
The results suggested that RAGT can provide stroke patients extra benefits in terms of ambulation, mobility, and balance. However, in the aspect of basic activities of daily living, the effect of RAGT on stroke patients is similar to that of traditional physiotherapy.
{"title":"Effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training in stroke rehabilitation: A retrospective matched control study","authors":"Bryan Ping Ho Chung MSc in Health Care","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in improving functional outcomes among stroke patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a retrospective matched control study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>This study was conducted in an extended inpatient rehabilitation centre.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and intervention</h3><p>There were 14 patients with subacute stroke (4–31 days after stroke) in the RAGT group. Apart from traditional physiotherapy, the RAGT group received RAGT. The number of sessions for RAGT ranged from five to 33, and the frequency was three to five sessions per week, with each session lasting for 15–30 minutes. In the control group, there were 27 subacute stroke patients who were matched with the RAGT group in terms of age, days since stroke, premorbid ambulatory level, functional outcomes at admission, length of training, and number of physiotherapy sessions received. The control group received traditional physiotherapy but not RAGT.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC), Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI), Berg's Balance Scale (BBS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) to measure ambulation, mobility, balance, and activities of daily living, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both RAGT and control groups had significant within-group improvement in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI. However, the RAGT group had higher gain in MFAC, MRMI, BBS, and MBI than the control group. In addition, there were significant between-group differences in MFAC, MRMI, and BBS gains (<em>p</em> = 0.026, <em>p</em> = 0.010, and <em>p</em> = 0.042, respectively). There was no significant between-group difference (<em>p</em> = 0.597) in MBI gain (<em>p</em> = 0.597).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results suggested that RAGT can provide stroke patients extra benefits in terms of ambulation, mobility, and balance. However, in the aspect of basic activities of daily living, the effect of RAGT on stroke patients is similar to that of traditional physiotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.09.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37106272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.08.001
Clint J. Newstead BPhysio (Hons), Jack A. Seaton BPhysio (Hons), Catherine L. Johnston PhD, MAppSc (Cardiopulmonary Physiotherapy), BAppSc (Physiotherapy)
Background
Chest physiotherapy techniques, such as percussion, postural drainage, and expiratory vibrations, may be employed in a critical care setting. Physiotherapists are primarily responsible for their provision; however, nurses have also traditionally implemented these treatments. It is unclear whether nurses consider chest physiotherapy to be a part of their role, or how they perceive their knowledge and confidence pertaining to these techniques.
Objective
To investigate the attitudes of nurses towards traditional chest physiotherapy techniques.
Method
A total of 1222 members of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey.
Results
There were 142 respondents (12%) with the majority (n = 132, 93%) having performed chest physiotherapy techniques in clinical practice. Most of them considered that the provision of chest physiotherapy was a part of nurse's role. Commonly cited factors influencing nurses' use of chest physiotherapy techniques were the availability of physiotherapy services, adequacy of nursing staff training and skill, and perceptions of professional roles.
Conclusions
Nurses working in critical care commonly utilised traditional chest physiotherapy techniques. Further research is required to investigate the reasons why nursing professionals might assume responsibility for the provision of chest physiotherapy techniques, and if their application of these techniques is consistent with evidence-based recommendations.
{"title":"Australian critical care nursing professionals' attitudes towards the use of traditional “chest physiotherapy” techniques","authors":"Clint J. Newstead BPhysio (Hons), Jack A. Seaton BPhysio (Hons), Catherine L. Johnston PhD, MAppSc (Cardiopulmonary Physiotherapy), BAppSc (Physiotherapy)","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chest physiotherapy techniques, such as percussion, postural drainage, and expiratory vibrations, may be employed in a critical care setting. Physiotherapists are primarily responsible for their provision; however, nurses have also traditionally implemented these treatments. It is unclear whether nurses consider chest physiotherapy to be a part of their role, or how they perceive their knowledge and confidence pertaining to these techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the attitudes of nurses towards traditional chest physiotherapy techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A total of 1222 members of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 142 respondents (12%) with the majority (<em>n</em> = 132, 93%) having performed chest physiotherapy techniques in clinical practice. Most of them considered that the provision of chest physiotherapy was a part of nurse's role. Commonly cited factors influencing nurses' use of chest physiotherapy techniques were the availability of physiotherapy services, adequacy of nursing staff training and skill, and perceptions of professional roles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nurses working in critical care commonly utilised traditional chest physiotherapy techniques. Further research is required to investigate the reasons why nursing professionals might assume responsibility for the provision of chest physiotherapy techniques, and if their application of these techniques is consistent with evidence-based recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 33-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.08.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37106275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002
Apoorva Phadke MPT , Nilima Bedekar PhD , Ashok Shyam MS (Ortho) , Parag Sancheti MS (Ortho)
Background
Mechanical neck pain is one of the common musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle energy technique (MET) may be a useful intervention for treating such disorder.
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of MET with passive stretching on pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty patients with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either the MET group or control group. The former group received MET, and the latter group received static stretching. Both groups received conventional therapy. Treatment was given once a day for 6 days. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the intensity of pain, and functional disability was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) was immediately before treatment and again on the 6th day.
Results
VAS and NDI scores showed a significant improvement in both MET and stretching groups on the 6th day postintervention (p < 0.05). However, both VAS and NDI scores showed better improvement in the MET group as compared to the stretching group (p < 0.025).
Conclusion
Muscle energy technique was better than stretching technique in improving pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.
{"title":"Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Apoorva Phadke MPT , Nilima Bedekar PhD , Ashok Shyam MS (Ortho) , Parag Sancheti MS (Ortho)","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mechanical neck pain is one of the common musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle energy technique (MET) may be a useful intervention for treating such disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of MET with passive stretching on pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty patients with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either the MET group or control group. The former group received MET, and the latter group received static stretching. Both groups received conventional therapy. Treatment was given once a day for 6 days. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the intensity of pain, and functional disability was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI) was immediately before treatment and again on the 6<sup>th</sup> day.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VAS and NDI scores showed a significant improvement in both MET and stretching groups on the 6<sup>th</sup> day postintervention (<em>p</em> < 0.05). However, both VAS and NDI scores showed better improvement in the MET group as compared to the stretching group (<em>p</em> < 0.025).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Muscle energy technique was better than stretching technique in improving pain and functional disability in people with mechanical neck pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37108190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001
Matthew H.M. Chan MPT, Donald T.F. Keung MPT, Steve Y.T. Lui MPT, Roy T.H. Cheung PhD
Background
To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests.
Objective
This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition.
Methods
Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods.
Results
The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC(2,1) = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC(2,1) = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test.
Conclusion
We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.
{"title":"A validation study of a smartphone application for functional mobility assessment of the elderly","authors":"Matthew H.M. Chan MPT, Donald T.F. Keung MPT, Steve Y.T. Lui MPT, Roy T.H. Cheung PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To minimize the reaction time and position judgment error using stopwatch-timed measures, we developed a smartphone application to measure performance in the five-time sit-to-stand (FTSTS) and timed up-and-go (TUG) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub>] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.11.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37108189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In primary healthcare (PHC) service, community residents, village health volunteers (VHVs), and healthcare professionals need to work in partnership to facilitate universal and equitable healthcare services. However, these partnerships may need an appropriate tool helping them to execute an effective health-related activity.
Objectives
To investigate the reliability and validity of a simple kyphosis measure using a perpendicular distance from the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) to the wall (C7WD).
Methods
Elderly people with different degrees of kyphosis (n = 179) were cross-sectionally investigated for the intra- and interrater reliability of the measurement by a physical therapist (PT), VHV, and caregiver. The validity was assessed in terms of concurrent validity as compared with the Flexicurve, and discriminative validity for functional deterioration in participants with mild, moderate, and severe kyphosis.
Results
The method showed excellent reliability among PT, VHV, and caregivers (ICC > 0.90, p < 0.001), and excellent correlation to the data from the Flexicurve. Results of the assessment were greater than a level of minimal detectable change and could clearly discriminate functional deterioration in participants with different severity of kyphosis (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
C7WD is valid and reliable, thus it can be used to promote the standardisation of kyphosis measures among PHC members.
在初级卫生保健(PHC)服务中,社区居民、乡村卫生志愿者(VHVs)和卫生保健专业人员需要携手合作,促进普及和公平的卫生保健服务。然而,这些伙伴关系可能需要一种适当的工具来帮助它们有效地开展与健康有关的活动。目的探讨采用第七颈椎(C7)与颈壁垂直距离(C7WD)测量简单后凸的信度和效度。方法通过物理治疗师(PT)、VHV和护理人员对179例不同程度后凸的老年人进行横断面调查,研究测量结果的内部和内部信度。效度是根据与flexiccurve相比较的并发效度和轻度、中度和重度后凸参与者的功能恶化的判别效度来评估的。结果该方法在PT、VHV和护理人员(ICC >0.90, p <0.001),并且与flexiccurve的数据有很好的相关性。评估的结果大于最小可检测变化的水平,并且可以清楚地区分不同程度后凸的参与者的功能恶化(p <0.001)。结论c7wd有效可靠,可用于促进PHC成员间脊柱后凸措施的规范化。
{"title":"Validity and reliability of a thoracic kyphotic assessment tool measuring distance of the seventh cervical vertebra from the wall","authors":"Pipatana Amatachaya PhD , Sawitree Wongsa MSc , Thanat Sooknuan M. Eng. , Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PhD , Maneepan Laophosri MSc , Nuttaset Manimanakorn MD, PhD , Sugalya Amatachaya PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In primary healthcare (PHC) service, community residents, village health volunteers (VHVs), and healthcare professionals need to work in partnership to facilitate universal and equitable healthcare services. However, these partnerships may need an appropriate tool helping them to execute an effective health-related activity.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the reliability and validity of a simple kyphosis measure using a perpendicular distance from the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) to the wall (C<sub>7</sub>WD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Elderly people with different degrees of kyphosis (<em>n</em> = 179) were cross-sectionally investigated for the intra- and interrater reliability of the measurement by a physical therapist (PT), VHV, and caregiver. The validity was assessed in terms of concurrent validity as compared with the Flexicurve, and discriminative validity for functional deterioration in participants with mild, moderate, and severe kyphosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The method showed excellent reliability among PT, VHV, and caregivers (ICC > 0.90, <em>p</em> < 0.001), and excellent correlation to the data from the Flexicurve. Results of the assessment were greater than a level of minimal detectable change and could clearly discriminate functional deterioration in participants with different severity of kyphosis (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>C<sub>7</sub>WD is valid and reliable, thus it can be used to promote the standardisation of kyphosis measures among PHC members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.05.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37108193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.06.001
Abeer Ahmed Abdelhameed , Amr Almaz Abdel-aziem
Background
Repetitive movements and poor posture are associated with over-use of smartphones when texting or playing games and significantly contribute to the symptoms of pain and discomfort in the upper extremities.
Objective
This study investigated the effect of exercise training and postural correction on disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), hand grip and key pinch strength among smartphone users.
Methods
One hundred university students were randomly divided into two groups; the experimental group participated in a 12-week programme of exercise training and postural corrections. The control group were instructed to follow their usual routine for smartphone utilization. Measurements of DASH scores, hand grip strength, and key pinch grip strength were conducted before and after 12 weeks for both groups.
Results
There were no significant differences between the start values of both groups for DASH scores, hand grip strength, and key pinch strength (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant improvement in all outcomes measured in the experimental group (p < 0.05), with significant changes in the outcomes of the control group.
Conclusion
Postural correction combined with a selected exercise training programme improved the hand grip, key pinch grip strength, and upper extremity disability and symptoms associated with smartphone use among university students.
{"title":"Exercise training and postural correction improve upper extremity symptoms among touchscreen smartphone users","authors":"Abeer Ahmed Abdelhameed , Amr Almaz Abdel-aziem","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Repetitive movements and poor posture are associated with over-use of smartphones when texting or playing games and significantly contribute to the symptoms of pain and discomfort in the upper extremities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated the effect of exercise training and postural correction on disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), hand grip and key pinch strength among smartphone users.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred university students were randomly divided into two groups; the experimental group participated in a 12-week programme of exercise training and postural corrections. The control group were instructed to follow their usual routine for smartphone utilization. Measurements of DASH scores, hand grip strength, and key pinch grip strength were conducted before and after 12 weeks for both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between the start values of both groups for DASH scores, hand grip strength, and key pinch strength (<em>p</em> > 0.05). However, there was a significant improvement in all outcomes measured in the experimental group (<em>p</em> < 0.05), with significant changes in the outcomes of the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postural correction combined with a selected exercise training programme improved the hand grip, key pinch grip strength, and upper extremity disability and symptoms associated with smartphone use among university students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.06.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37108194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-12-01DOI: 10.1016/S1013-7025(16)30086-0
{"title":"Authorship and Conflict statement","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1013-7025(16)30086-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1013-7025(16)30086-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages e8-e10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1013-7025(16)30086-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92265868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}