首页 > 最新文献

International Journal for Educational Integrity最新文献

英文 中文
What are Automated Paraphrasing Tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity 什么是自动释义工具?我们如何使用它们?对日益严重的学术诚信威胁的评论
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w
Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins
{"title":"What are Automated Paraphrasing Tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity","authors":"Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53015502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Examining and improving inclusive practice in institutional academic integrity policies, procedures, teaching and support 检查和改进机构学术诚信政策、程序、教学和支持方面的包容性实践
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00108-x
Davis, Mary
This research aimed to analyse inclusive practice in academic integrity in the teaching, support, policies and procedures involved at one UK HE institution. Data was collected through two sets of stakeholder interviews: three students from disadvantaged groups who had experienced academic conduct investigations; eleven staff with key roles in academic integrity (teaching, student support, library, investigations, senior management, Student Union). A third set of data comprised four institutional academic integrity documents which were analysed in terms of meeting Universal Design for Learning principles for inclusion. The four main findings emerging from the study are: academic conduct processes create high levels of anxiety among students, particularly related to perceived judgement; students experience difficulty understanding academic integrity documents which lack consistency and do not meet inclusive criteria; students from certain backgrounds including widening participation, students with a disability and international non-native speakers need more institutional support in order to follow academic conduct processes and assimilate expected practice; there is a willingness among staff to try to develop more inclusive practice. The research findings led to a revised, more inclusive and educative institutional academic conduct procedure. The implication for practice is that attention is urgently needed to improve inclusive approaches to academic integrity.
本研究旨在分析一所英国高等教育机构在教学、支持、政策和程序方面的学术诚信包容性实践。通过两组利益相关者访谈收集数据:三名经历过学术行为调查的弱势群体学生;11名在学术诚信方面发挥重要作用的人员(教学、学生支持、图书馆、调查、高级管理、学生会)。第三组数据包括四份机构学术诚信文件,这些文件是根据满足学习通用设计原则的包容性来分析的。该研究得出的四个主要发现是:学术行为过程使学生产生高度焦虑,尤其是与感知判断相关的焦虑;学生难以理解缺乏一致性和不符合包容性标准的学术诚信文件;来自某些背景的学生,包括扩大参与,残疾学生和国际非母语人士,需要更多的机构支持,以遵循学术行为流程并吸收预期的实践;工作人员都愿意努力发展更具包容性的做法。研究结果导致修订,更具包容性和教育机构的学术行为程序。这对实践的启示是,迫切需要关注改善学术诚信的包容性方法。
{"title":"Examining and improving inclusive practice in institutional academic integrity policies, procedures, teaching and support","authors":"Davis, Mary","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00108-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00108-x","url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to analyse inclusive practice in academic integrity in the teaching, support, policies and procedures involved at one UK HE institution. Data was collected through two sets of stakeholder interviews: three students from disadvantaged groups who had experienced academic conduct investigations; eleven staff with key roles in academic integrity (teaching, student support, library, investigations, senior management, Student Union). A third set of data comprised four institutional academic integrity documents which were analysed in terms of meeting Universal Design for Learning principles for inclusion. The four main findings emerging from the study are: academic conduct processes create high levels of anxiety among students, particularly related to perceived judgement; students experience difficulty understanding academic integrity documents which lack consistency and do not meet inclusive criteria; students from certain backgrounds including widening participation, students with a disability and international non-native speakers need more institutional support in order to follow academic conduct processes and assimilate expected practice; there is a willingness among staff to try to develop more inclusive practice. The research findings led to a revised, more inclusive and educative institutional academic conduct procedure. The implication for practice is that attention is urgently needed to improve inclusive approaches to academic integrity.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"448 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138514454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Breaches of integrity in teacher administration in Ghana 加纳教师管理中违反诚信的行为
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00106-z
J. Kwarteng
{"title":"Breaches of integrity in teacher administration in Ghana","authors":"J. Kwarteng","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00106-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00106-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53015316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Using digital forensics in higher education to detect academic misconduct 在高等教育中使用数字取证来检测学术不端行为
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00104-1
Johnson, Clare, Davies, Ross, Reddy, Mike
Academic misconduct in all its various forms is a challenge for degree-granting institutions. Whilst text-based plagiarism can be detected using tools such as Turnitin™, Plagscan™ and Urkund™ (amongst others), contract cheating and collusion can be more difficult to detect, and even harder to prove, often falling to no more than a ‘balance of probabilities’ rather than fact. To further complicate the matter, some students will make deliberate attempts to obfuscate cheating behaviours by submitting work in Portable Document Format, in image form, or by inserting hidden glyphs or using alternative character sets which text matching software does not always accurately detect (Rogerson, Int J Educ Integr 13, 2017; Heather, Assess Eval High Educ 35:647-660, 2010). Educators do not tend to think of academic misconduct in terms of criminality per se, but the tools and techniques used by digital forensics experts in law enforcement can teach us much about how to investigate allegations of academic misconduct. The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Glossary describes digital forensics as ‘the application of computer science and investigative procedures involving the examination of digital evidence - following proper search authority, chain of custody, validation with mathematics, use of validated tools, repeatability, reporting, and possibly expert testimony.’ (NIST, Digital Forensics, 2021). These techniques are used in criminal investigations as a means to identify the perpetrator of, or accomplices to, a crime and their associated actions. They are sometimes used in cases relating to intellectual property to establish the legitimate ownership of a variety of objects, both written and graphical, as well as in fraud and forgery (Jeong and Lee, Digit Investig 23:3-10, 2017; Fu et. al, Digit Investig 8:44–55, 2011 ). Whilst there have been some research articles and case studies that demonstrate the use of digital forensics techniques to detect academic misconduct as proof of concept, there is no evidence of their actual deployment in an academic setting. This paper will examine some of the tools and techniques that are used in law enforcement and the digital forensics field with a view to determining whether they could be repurposed for use in an academic setting. These include methods widely used to determine if a file has been tampered with that could be repurposed to identify if an image is plagiarised; file extraction techniques for examining meta data, used in criminal cases to determine authorship of documents, and tools such as FTK™ and Autopsy™ which are used to forensically examine single files as well as entire hard drives. The paper will also present a prototype of a bespoke software tool that attempts to repurpose some of these techniques into an automated process for detecting plagiarism and / or contract cheating in Word documents. Finally, this article will discuss whether these tools have a place in an academic setting and wh
各种形式的学术不端行为对学位授予机构来说是一个挑战。虽然基于文本的抄袭可以使用Turnitin™,Plagscan™和Urkund™(以及其他工具)等工具来检测,但合同作弊和共谋可能更难检测,甚至更难证明,通常只是“概率平衡”而不是事实。为了使问题进一步复杂化,一些学生会故意试图通过以可移植文档格式、图像形式提交作业,或通过插入隐藏的字形或使用文本匹配软件并不总是准确检测到的替代字符集来混淆作弊行为(Rogerson, Int J Educ integr13, 2017;李志强,《高等教育》(英文版),2010)。教育工作者并不倾向于将学术不端行为本身视为犯罪行为,但执法部门数字取证专家使用的工具和技术可以教会我们如何调查学术不端行为的指控。美国国家标准与技术研究所的术语表将数字取证描述为“涉及数字证据审查的计算机科学和调查程序的应用——遵循适当的搜索权限、监管链、数学验证、使用经过验证的工具、可重复性、报告,以及可能的专家证词。”(NIST,数字取证,2021)。这些技术用于刑事调查,作为一种手段,以查明犯罪的肇事者或共犯及其相关行为。它们有时被用于与知识产权有关的案件中,以确定各种物品的合法所有权,包括文字和图形,以及欺诈和伪造(Jeong和Lee, Digit investigation 23:3-10, 2017;傅等,数字调查8:44-55,2011)。虽然已经有一些研究文章和案例研究证明了使用数字取证技术来检测学术不端行为作为概念证明,但没有证据表明它们在学术环境中实际部署。本文将研究执法和数字取证领域使用的一些工具和技术,以确定它们是否可以重新用于学术环境。其中包括广泛用于确定文件是否被篡改的方法,这些方法可以重新用于识别图像是否被剽窃;用于检查元数据的文件提取技术,在刑事案件中用于确定文件的作者,以及用于法医检查单个文件以及整个硬盘驱动器的FTK™和Autopsy™等工具。本文还将介绍一个定制软件工具的原型,该工具试图将这些技术中的一些重新用于检测Word文档中的剽窃和/或合同欺诈的自动化过程。最后,本文将讨论这些工具是否在学术环境中占有一席之地,以及它们在确定学生的工作是否真正属于他们自己时的使用是否合乎道德。
{"title":"Using digital forensics in higher education to detect academic misconduct","authors":"Johnson, Clare, Davies, Ross, Reddy, Mike","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00104-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00104-1","url":null,"abstract":"Academic misconduct in all its various forms is a challenge for degree-granting institutions. Whilst text-based plagiarism can be detected using tools such as Turnitin™, Plagscan™ and Urkund™ (amongst others), contract cheating and collusion can be more difficult to detect, and even harder to prove, often falling to no more than a ‘balance of probabilities’ rather than fact. To further complicate the matter, some students will make deliberate attempts to obfuscate cheating behaviours by submitting work in Portable Document Format, in image form, or by inserting hidden glyphs or using alternative character sets which text matching software does not always accurately detect (Rogerson, Int J Educ Integr 13, 2017; Heather, Assess Eval High Educ 35:647-660, 2010). Educators do not tend to think of academic misconduct in terms of criminality per se, but the tools and techniques used by digital forensics experts in law enforcement can teach us much about how to investigate allegations of academic misconduct. The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Glossary describes digital forensics as ‘the application of computer science and investigative procedures involving the examination of digital evidence - following proper search authority, chain of custody, validation with mathematics, use of validated tools, repeatability, reporting, and possibly expert testimony.’ (NIST, Digital Forensics, 2021). These techniques are used in criminal investigations as a means to identify the perpetrator of, or accomplices to, a crime and their associated actions. They are sometimes used in cases relating to intellectual property to establish the legitimate ownership of a variety of objects, both written and graphical, as well as in fraud and forgery (Jeong and Lee, Digit Investig 23:3-10, 2017; Fu et. al, Digit Investig 8:44–55, 2011 ). Whilst there have been some research articles and case studies that demonstrate the use of digital forensics techniques to detect academic misconduct as proof of concept, there is no evidence of their actual deployment in an academic setting. This paper will examine some of the tools and techniques that are used in law enforcement and the digital forensics field with a view to determining whether they could be repurposed for use in an academic setting. These include methods widely used to determine if a file has been tampered with that could be repurposed to identify if an image is plagiarised; file extraction techniques for examining meta data, used in criminal cases to determine authorship of documents, and tools such as FTK™ and Autopsy™ which are used to forensically examine single files as well as entire hard drives. The paper will also present a prototype of a bespoke software tool that attempts to repurpose some of these techniques into an automated process for detecting plagiarism and / or contract cheating in Word documents. Finally, this article will discuss whether these tools have a place in an academic setting and wh","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"307 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138514462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Facilitating development of research ethics and integrity leadership competencies 促进研究伦理和诚信领导能力的发展
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00102-3
Anu Tammeleht, Erika Löfström, ja María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana
{"title":"Facilitating development of research ethics and integrity leadership competencies","authors":"Anu Tammeleht, Erika Löfström, ja María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00102-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00102-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47519281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Elements of academic integrity in a cross-cultural middle eastern educational system: Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan case study 跨文化中东教育体系中的学术诚信要素:沙特阿拉伯、埃及和约旦案例研究
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-04-26 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-021-00095-5
A. Farahat
{"title":"Elements of academic integrity in a cross-cultural middle eastern educational system: Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan case study","authors":"A. Farahat","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00095-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00095-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46799805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Practical randomly selected question exam design to address replicated and sequential questions in online examinations 实际随机选择的问题考试设计,以解决复制和顺序的问题,在网上考试
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-04-12 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00103-2
Ahmed M. Elkhatat
{"title":"Practical randomly selected question exam design to address replicated and sequential questions in online examinations","authors":"Ahmed M. Elkhatat","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00103-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00103-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53015172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
New priorities for academic integrity: equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization 学术诚信的新优先事项:公平、多样性、包容性、非殖民化和本土化
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0
Sarah Elaine Eaton

The topics of equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization, and Indigenization have been neglected in academic and research integrity. In this article, I offer examples of how these issues are being addressed and argue that academic integrity networks and organizations ought to develop intentional strategies for equity, diversity and inclusion, and decolonization in terms of leadership, scholarship, and professional opportunities. I point out that existing systems perpetuate the conditions that allow for overrepresentation of reporting among particular student groups including international students, students of colour, and those for whom English is an additional language. I conclude with concrete recommendations for action.

公平、多样性、包容性、非殖民化和本土化等主题在学术和研究诚信中被忽视。在这篇文章中,我提供了如何解决这些问题的例子,并认为学术诚信网络和组织应该在领导力,奖学金和专业机会方面制定公平,多样性和包容性以及非殖民化的有意战略。我指出,现有的系统使特定学生群体(包括国际学生、有色人种学生和英语是额外语言的学生)的报告比例过高的情况持续存在。最后,我提出具体的行动建议。
{"title":"New priorities for academic integrity: equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization","authors":"Sarah Elaine Eaton","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The topics of equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization, and Indigenization have been neglected in academic and research integrity. In this article, I offer examples of how these issues are being addressed and argue that academic integrity networks and organizations ought to develop intentional strategies for equity, diversity and inclusion, and decolonization in terms of leadership, scholarship, and professional opportunities. I point out that existing systems perpetuate the conditions that allow for overrepresentation of reporting among particular student groups including international students, students of colour, and those for whom English is an additional language. I conclude with concrete recommendations for action.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"362 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138514461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Visual plagiarism in interior design: is it easy to recognise? 室内设计中的视觉抄袭:容易识别吗?
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00101-4
Donia M. Bettaieb, A. Alawad, Raif B. Malek
{"title":"Visual plagiarism in interior design: is it easy to recognise?","authors":"Donia M. Bettaieb, A. Alawad, Raif B. Malek","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00101-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00101-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53015005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there a relationship between student attitudes and behavior regarding integrity issues? 学生对诚信问题的态度和行为之间是否存在关系?
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-022-00100-5
Hanneke Mol, Mariëtte van den Hoven

Stimulating responsible conduct of research is considered important within universities and research organizations. In this contribution, we investigated if there are gender differences regarding three aspects: students’ attitudes towards integrity related issues, self-reported misconduct, and suspicions of misconduct and willingness to report fellow students. A questionnaire was sent to 1266 first year starting master students in the life sciences. Male students were significantly more likely to report not doing their fair share in group work and putting their name on work without checking it. No significant differences were found regarding attitude and suspecting and reporting other students.

在大学和研究机构中,鼓励负责任的研究行为被认为是重要的。在这篇论文中,我们调查了三个方面是否存在性别差异:学生对诚信相关问题的态度、自我报告的不当行为、对不当行为的怀疑和举报同学的意愿。研究人员向1266名生命科学专业一年级硕士研究生发送了一份调查问卷。男生更有可能在小组作业中没有完成应有的份额,并且在作业上署名而不检查。在态度、怀疑和举报其他学生方面没有发现显著差异。
{"title":"Is there a relationship between student attitudes and behavior regarding integrity issues?","authors":"Hanneke Mol, Mariëtte van den Hoven","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00100-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00100-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stimulating responsible conduct of research is considered important within universities and research organizations. In this contribution, we investigated if there are gender differences regarding three aspects: students’ attitudes towards integrity related issues, self-reported misconduct, and suspicions of misconduct and willingness to report fellow students. A questionnaire was sent to 1266 first year starting master students in the life sciences. Male students were significantly more likely to report not doing their fair share in group work and putting their name on work without checking it. No significant differences were found regarding attitude and suspecting and reporting other students.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"256 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138514460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
International Journal for Educational Integrity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1