Ultrasound International Open最新文献

Purpose To compare the outcomes of different mammographic lesions based on the presence of an ultrasound (US) correlate and to estimate how often targeted US can identify such lesions. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included all consecutive cases from 2010 to 2016, with Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) categories 4 & 5 who underwent US as part of their diagnostic workup. We compared the incidence of malignancy between lesions comprising a US correlate that underwent US-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and those without a correlate that underwent stereotactic CNB. Results 833 lesions met the study criteria and included masses (64.3%), architectural distortion (19%), asymmetries (4.6%), and calcifications (12.1%). The CNB-based positive predictive value (PPV) was higher for lesions with a US correlate than for those without (40.2% [36.1, 44.4%] vs. 18.9% [14.5, 23.9%], respectively) (p<0.001). Malignancy odds for masses, asymmetries, architectural distortion, and calcifications were greater by 2.70, 4.17, 4.98, and 2.77 times, respectively, for the US-guided CNB (p<0.001, p=0.091, p<0.001, and p=0.034, respectively). Targeted US identified a correlate to 66.3% of the mammographic findings. The odds of finding a correlate were greater for masses (77.8%) than architectural distortions (53.8%) (p<0.001) or calcifications (24.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusion The success of targeted US in identifying a correlate varies significantly according to the type of mammographic lesion. The PPV of lesions with a US correlate was significantly higher than that of those with no correlate. However, the PPV of lesions with no US correlate is high enough (18.9%) to warrant a biopsy.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1795-5138.].

Purpose Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used, but the sensitivity and specificity of the findings are highly user-dependent. There are many different approaches to ultrasound training. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of hands-on practice when learning POCUS. Methods Junior doctors with no or limited ultrasound experience were included in the study and divided into three groups. They all completed a Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) course with different amounts of hands-on practice: 40 minutes (n=67), 60 minutes (n=12), and 90 minutes of hands-on time (n=27). By the end of the course, they all completed a previously validated test. Results More hands-on time improved the mean test scores and decreased the test time. The scores of the 40-, 60-, and 90-minute groups were 11.6 (SD 2.1), 12.8 (SD 2.5), and 13.7 (SD 2.5), respectively (p<0.001). The 90-minute group completed the test significantly faster than the other two groups (20 versus 26 minutes, p=0.003). A large inter-individual variation was seen. Conclusion The necessary amount of hands-on training is unknown. This study demonstrates that performance increases with prolonged hands-on time but the inter-individual variation among trainees is very large, thereby making it impossible to define the "optimal" time. This supports the use of the concept of mastery learning where each individual trainee can continue training until proficiency is reached.

It is my great pleasure to welcome the first issue of Ultrasound International Open in 2022 even though 2023 is approaching.

Purpose Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound is routinely used to detect cardiac valve stenoses. Vector flow imaging (VFI) is an angle-independent real-time ultrasound method that can quantify flow complexity. We aimed to evaluate if quantification of flow complexity could reliably assess valvular stenosis in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods Nine pediatric patients with echocardiographically confirmed valvular stenosis were included in the study. VFI and Doppler measurements were compared with transvalvular peak-to-peak pressure differences derived from invasive endovascular catheterization. Results Vector concentration correlated with the catheter measurements before intervention after exclusion of one outlier (r=-0.83, p=0.01), whereas the Doppler method did not (r=0.49, p=0.22). The change in vector concentration after intervention correlated strongly with the change in the measured catheter pressure difference (r=-0.86, p=0.003), while Doppler showed a tendency for a moderate correlation (r=0.63, p=0.07). Conclusion Transthoracic flow complexity quantification calculated from VFI data is feasible and may be useful for assessing valvular stenosis severity in pediatric patients.

Purpose A semantic feature-based reporting proforma for intraoperative ultrasound findings in brain tumors was devised to standardize reporting. It was applied as a pilot study on a cohort of histologically confirmed high-grade supratentorial gliomas (Grade 3 and 4) for internal validation. Materials and Methods This intraoperative semantic ultrasound proforma was used to evaluate 3D ultrasound volumes using Radiant DICOM software by 3 surgeons. The ultrasound semantic features were correlated with histological features like tumor grade, IDH status, and MIB index. Results 68 patients were analyzed using the semantic proforma. Irregular crenated was the most common margin (63.2%) and lesions were heterogeneously hyperechoic (95.6%). Necrosis was commonly seen and noted as single (67.6%) or multiple (13.2%) in over 80% cases. A separate perilesional zone, which was predominantly hyperechoic in 41.8% and both hypo and hyperechoic in 12.7%, could be identified in 54.5% of cases. Grade 4 tumors were more likely to have an irregular crenated margin (71.2%) with a single large area of necrosis, while Grade 3 tumors were likely to have smooth (31.3%) or non-characterizable margins (31.2%) with no or multiple areas of necrosis. IDH-negative tumors were more likely to have a single large focus of necrosis. Among the GBMs (52 cases), MIB labelling index of>15% was associated with poorly delineated, uncharacterizable margins, when compared with MIB labelling index<15% (23.5 vs. 0%), (p=0.046). Conclusion A detailed semantic proforma was developed for brain tumors and was internally validated. A few ultrasound sematic features were identified correlating with histological features in high-grade gliomas. It will require further external validation for refinement and acceptability.

Purpose Pheochromocytoma (PCC) and adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) are two rare endocrine diseases. Early diagnosis is crucial to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. In this study, we used endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for high-resolution imaging to investigate the endosonographic morphology pattern of PCC and ACC. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study included 58 PCC/ACC lesions diagnosed by EUS imaging at two tertiary care centers between 1997 and 2015. The following groups were defined by histology or by the presence of a pheochromocytoma-associated syndrome without histological proof: bPCC (benign PCC), mPCC (malignant PCC), and ACC. Results In our cohort, mPCC tended to be larger at the time of diagnosis (n=5; 39.9±41.9 mm) than bPCC (n=46; 27.3 ±20.8 mm, P=0.548). ACC lesions were significantly larger (n=7; 50.6±14.8 mm) than bPCC and mPCC (n=51; 28.5±23.3 mm, P=0.002). In EUS, bPCC and ACC lesions frequently appeared to have a round shape and nodular structure. bPCC and ACC tended to be more hyperechoic (P=0.112 and P=0.558, respectively) and heterogeneous (P=0.501 and P=0.098, respectively) than mPCC. Compared to PCC, ACC did not show high hyperperfusion (P=0.022). In contrast to adenoma, all tumor entities showed hypo-/anechoic areas within the tumor (P<0.05). Conclusion No significant differences in EUS morphology were found to reliably distinguish benign from malignant PCC and ACC lesions. However, EUS may be a reasonable alternative or complementary method to conventional imaging techniques for the early detection of these tumor entities.

Dear Colleagues, It is a special pleasure to introduce the first issue of Ultrasound International Open in a still difficult year - a year, in which many of us had concerns and clinical tasks reaching far beyond basic or clinical science on ultrasonography (US). Thus, I am delighted to draw your attention to some interesting and important new papers teaching us on various aspects of our every day's US practice.