Surgical resection remains the primary curative treatment option for patients with colorectal liver metastases. While the majority of patients will develop tumor relapse within or outside of the liver after hepatic metastasectomy, a subset of these patients may be amenable to salvage surgical resection. However, outcomes for this approach are not well defined. In this article, we summarize the current evidence for the incidence, feasibility and outcomes of salvage resection for recurrence after initial resection of colorectal liver metastases.
{"title":"Surgical salvage of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases: incidence and outcomes.","authors":"Nuh N Rahbari, Michael I D'Angelica","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0002","DOIUrl":"10.2217/hep-2017-0002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical resection remains the primary curative treatment option for patients with colorectal liver metastases. While the majority of patients will develop tumor relapse within or outside of the liver after hepatic metastasectomy, a subset of these patients may be amenable to salvage surgical resection. However, outcomes for this approach are not well defined. In this article, we summarize the current evidence for the incidence, feasibility and outcomes of salvage resection for recurrence after initial resection of colorectal liver metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095401/pdf/hep-04-25.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35284114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-07-01Epub Date: 2017-10-30DOI: 10.2217/hep-2017-0005
Olaguoke Akinwande, Veer Shah, Abigail Mills, Christopher Noda, Eric Weiner, Gretchen Foltz, Nael Saad
Aim: Compare radioembolization (Y90) and chemoembolization (CE) for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (UICC).
Materials & methods: Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective search was performed. Forty patients with UICC were treated with either Y90 (n = 25, 39 treatments) or CE (n = 15, 35 treatments). Comparative analysis was performed using Student's t and fisher-exact tests. Multivariable-logistic regression was also performed.
Results: Median ages were 60 and 64 years for CE and Y90 groups, respectively (p = 0.798). Patient variables including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor burden, extra-hepatic disease, prior chemotherapy and prior surgery were similar between groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups (CE 20%, Y90 26%; p > 0.9). Overall response rate (CE 6%, Y90 4%; p > 0.9) and disease control rate (CE 46%, Y90 48%; p > 0.9) were statistically similar. Multilogistic regression did not identify any variables that correlated with disease control rate, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and tumor burden.
Conclusion: Our observation shows that CE and Y90 display similar toxicity and disease control in the treatment of UICC.
{"title":"Chemoembolization versus radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a single institution image-based efficacy and comparative toxicity.","authors":"Olaguoke Akinwande, Veer Shah, Abigail Mills, Christopher Noda, Eric Weiner, Gretchen Foltz, Nael Saad","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Compare radioembolization (Y90) and chemoembolization (CE) for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (UICC).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective search was performed. Forty patients with UICC were treated with either Y90 (n = 25, 39 treatments) or CE (n = 15, 35 treatments). Comparative analysis was performed using Student's <i>t</i> and fisher-exact tests. Multivariable-logistic regression was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ages were 60 and 64 years for CE and Y90 groups, respectively (p = 0.798). Patient variables including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor burden, extra-hepatic disease, prior chemotherapy and prior surgery were similar between groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups (CE 20%, Y90 26%; p > 0.9). Overall response rate (CE 6%, Y90 4%; p > 0.9) and disease control rate (CE 46%, Y90 48%; p > 0.9) were statistically similar. Multilogistic regression did not identify any variables that correlated with disease control rate, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and tumor burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observation shows that CE and Y90 display similar toxicity and disease control in the treatment of UICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2017-0005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36467822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. A careful multidisciplinary assessment of tumor characteristics, liver function and physical status is required for proper therapeutic management. In recent years, several studies have supported the feasibility and benefit of combined therapy in the treatment of single large HCC, defined as those exceeding 3 cm in size. We present a case of combined treatment using radiofrequency ablation followed by trans-arterial chemoembolization with radiopaque embolic beads. The aim of this technical report was to describe the radiologic findings during combined radiofrequency ablation and radiopaque bead embolization, pointing out the differences and the potential advantages of using radiopaque beads compared with non-radiopaque beads. Furthermore, it is also the first report on using radiopaque beads in combined treatment for HCC.
{"title":"'Hug sign': a new radiological sign of intraprocedural success after combined treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Roberto Iezzi, Maurizio Pompili, Eleonora Brigida Annicchiarico, Matteo Garcovich, Massimo Siciliano, Antonio Gasbarrini, Riccardo Manfredi","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. A careful multidisciplinary assessment of tumor characteristics, liver function and physical status is required for proper therapeutic management. In recent years, several studies have supported the feasibility and benefit of combined therapy in the treatment of single large HCC, defined as those exceeding 3 cm in size. We present a case of combined treatment using radiofrequency ablation followed by trans-arterial chemoembolization with radiopaque embolic beads. The aim of this technical report was to describe the radiologic findings during combined radiofrequency ablation and radiopaque bead embolization, pointing out the differences and the potential advantages of using radiopaque beads compared with non-radiopaque beads. Furthermore, it is also the first report on using radiopaque beads in combined treatment for HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2017-0017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36467821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-07-01Epub Date: 2017-10-30DOI: 10.2217/hep-2017-0013
Stephanie Klein, Jean-François Dufour
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is becoming more common globally. The incidence of HCC due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in comparison to other etiologies is increasing. This is due to the pandemic of obesity and diabetes mellitus, two important risk factors for HCC. HCC arising in this context occurs in about 40% of the cases in a liver which is not yet cirrhotic. This has implications regarding the population which should be enrolled in an HCC surveillance program and regarding the treatment options. Surgery is more frequently contemplated in patients with HCC and no cirrhosis. However, patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-induced HCC have frequent co-morbidities which have to be taken into account when developing a management strategy. Interestingly, these patients are frequently on medications which have been suggested to decrease the risk to develop HCC.
{"title":"Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Stephanie Klein, Jean-François Dufour","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is becoming more common globally. The incidence of HCC due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in comparison to other etiologies is increasing. This is due to the pandemic of obesity and diabetes mellitus, two important risk factors for HCC. HCC arising in this context occurs in about 40% of the cases in a liver which is not yet cirrhotic. This has implications regarding the population which should be enrolled in an HCC surveillance program and regarding the treatment options. Surgery is more frequently contemplated in patients with HCC and no cirrhosis. However, patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-induced HCC have frequent co-morbidities which have to be taken into account when developing a management strategy. Interestingly, these patients are frequently on medications which have been suggested to decrease the risk to develop HCC.","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"83-98"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2017-0013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36465623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-04-01Epub Date: 2017-09-26DOI: 10.2217/hep-2017-0009
Valerie Fako, Xin Wei Wang
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold standard of therapy for patients with unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and is also commonly used as postresection adjuvant therapy in Asia. The delivery of TACE is highly variable from center to center, and clinical decision making for patients is based primarily on tumor staging guidelines, with very little focus on individualized tumor features. This review will discuss recent efforts for improving patient outcomes with TACE treatment through personalized medicine advances, including ongoing clinical trials investigating the combination of targeted therapy with TACE and the discovery of prognostic biomarkers for predicting TACE response.
{"title":"The status of transarterial chemoembolization treatment in the era of precision oncology.","authors":"Valerie Fako, Xin Wei Wang","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold standard of therapy for patients with unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and is also commonly used as postresection adjuvant therapy in Asia. The delivery of TACE is highly variable from center to center, and clinical decision making for patients is based primarily on tumor staging guidelines, with very little focus on individualized tumor features. This review will discuss recent efforts for improving patient outcomes with TACE treatment through personalized medicine advances, including ongoing clinical trials investigating the combination of targeted therapy with TACE and the discovery of prognostic biomarkers for predicting TACE response.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 2","pages":"55-63"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2017-0009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35582631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: We investigated the behavior of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib, and whether CEC levels were associated with time to progression (TTP).
Materials & methods: CECs in advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib were counted at baseline and every 4 weeks.
Results: Twenty four HCC patients were enrolled in the study. Median TTP was 3.2 months (1-6). Median baseline CEC levels were 67 cells/ml, with an increase of 169.8% after 4 weeks of treatment. Any time CEC levels in patients with a TTP lower than 4 months were higher, but not statistically significant, compared with those in patients with TTP more than 4 months.
Conclusion: Treatment with sorafenib changed CEC levels in HCC patients.
{"title":"Circulating endothelial cells and risk of progression in patients with hepatocellular cancer receiving sorafenib.","authors":"Petros Giovanis, Graziano Pianezze, Valter Vincenzi, Carla Manuppelli, Massimo Boaretto, Davide Pastorelli","doi":"10.2217/hep-2016-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2016-0011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We investigated the behavior of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib, and whether CEC levels were associated with time to progression (TTP).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>CECs in advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib were counted at baseline and every 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty four HCC patients were enrolled in the study. Median TTP was 3.2 months (1-6). Median baseline CEC levels were 67 cells/ml, with an increase of 169.8% after 4 weeks of treatment. Any time CEC levels in patients with a TTP lower than 4 months were higher, but not statistically significant, compared with those in patients with TTP more than 4 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with sorafenib changed CEC levels in HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 2","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2016-0011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36467818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-04-01Epub Date: 2017-08-31DOI: 10.2217/hep-2017-0001
Giammaria Fiorentini, Andrea Mambrini, Donatella Sarti, Maurizio Cantore, Luca Mulazzani, Gian Maria Mattioli, Stefano Guadagni
Aim: The aim is to report clinical outcomes of hepatic intra-arterial (IACHT) and systemic chemotherapy (SCHT), followed by gemcitabine-based maintenance therapy (maintenance), for the treatment of relapsed or unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.
Patients & methods: In this retrospective observational study, 145 cholangiocarcinoma patients were treated with Epirubicin-Cisplatin as IACHT associated with Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil as SCHT. Maintenance was performed with gemcitabine-based schedule. Toxicity was assessed with NCI-CTCAE and tumor response with RECIST 1.1.
Results: Tumor response was complete in 1%, partial in 20%, stable disease in 48% and progression in 31% of patients (3 months after therapy). The most frequent adverse events were: anemia (24%), nausea and vomiting (33%), alopecia (60%).
Conclusion: Cholangiocarcinoma patients may benefit from IAHCT-SCHT. Maintenance may prolong clinical benefits. ClinicalTrials.gov registry Identifier: NCT01920503.
{"title":"Hepatic intra-arterial and systemic chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Giammaria Fiorentini, Andrea Mambrini, Donatella Sarti, Maurizio Cantore, Luca Mulazzani, Gian Maria Mattioli, Stefano Guadagni","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to report clinical outcomes of hepatic intra-arterial (IACHT) and systemic chemotherapy (SCHT), followed by gemcitabine-based maintenance therapy (maintenance), for the treatment of relapsed or unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, 145 cholangiocarcinoma patients were treated with Epirubicin-Cisplatin as IACHT associated with Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil as SCHT. Maintenance was performed with gemcitabine-based schedule. Toxicity was assessed with NCI-CTCAE and tumor response with RECIST 1.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor response was complete in 1%, partial in 20%, stable disease in 48% and progression in 31% of patients (3 months after therapy). The most frequent adverse events were: anemia (24%), nausea and vomiting (33%), alopecia (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholangiocarcinoma patients may benefit from IAHCT-SCHT. Maintenance may prolong clinical benefits. ClinicalTrials.gov registry Identifier: NCT01920503.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 2","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2017-0001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36467819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-01Epub Date: 2017-07-06DOI: 10.2217/hep-2017-0008
Peter Lm Jansen
The liver is specialized in handling bile salts. Bile salts are needed for bile formation and the digestion of fats in the intestine. It is this digestive function that makes bile salts cytotoxic. At concentrations in the millimolar range bile salts act as detergents and at lower concentrations they are proapoptotic, proinflammatory and cause necrosis [1] . Therefore, when during evolution changes in nutritional habits demanded the digestion of fats as a source of calories, bile salts with detergent properties were needed and mechanisms evolved to limit the toxicity of bile salts in the liver. The farnesoid X-receptor (FXR) and FGF19 play a critical role as protectors of the liver. The
{"title":"Fibroblast growth factor 19, a double-edged sword.","authors":"Peter Lm Jansen","doi":"10.2217/hep-2017-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0008","url":null,"abstract":"The liver is specialized in handling bile salts. Bile salts are needed for bile formation and the digestion of fats in the intestine. It is this digestive function that makes bile salts cytotoxic. At concentrations in the millimolar range bile salts act as detergents and at lower concentrations they are proapoptotic, proinflammatory and cause necrosis [1] . Therefore, when during evolution changes in nutritional habits demanded the digestion of fats as a source of calories, bile salts with detergent properties were needed and mechanisms evolved to limit the toxicity of bile salts in the liver. The farnesoid X-receptor (FXR) and FGF19 play a critical role as protectors of the liver. The","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2017-0008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36467812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}