首页 > 最新文献

The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies最新文献

英文 中文
Interstitial Spaces: Social Collage and the Zimbabwe Cultural Center of Detroit 间隙空间:底特律的社会拼贴和津巴布韦文化中心
Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1468
Lisa Gordillo
{"title":"Interstitial Spaces: Social Collage and the Zimbabwe Cultural Center of Detroit","authors":"Lisa Gordillo","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1468","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124853054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protesting Too Much: Revealing Repetitions in Barry Hannah's Interviews 抗议太多:巴里·汉娜访谈中的揭露重复
Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1466
M. Blackwell
{"title":"Protesting Too Much: Revealing Repetitions in Barry Hannah's Interviews","authors":"M. Blackwell","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1466","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114752339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Souls All Unaccompanied: Enacting Levinasian Feminine Alterity in Housekeeping 无人陪伴的灵魂:在家政中塑造列文式女性另类
Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1473
Makayla Steiner
{"title":"Souls All Unaccompanied: Enacting Levinasian Feminine Alterity in Housekeeping","authors":"Makayla Steiner","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1473","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134130013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical Psychosis: Genre, Détournement, and Critique in Mr. Plinkett's Star Wars Reviews 批判性精神病:普林克特先生的《星球大战评论》中的类型、人格障碍和批评
Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1430
Benjamin Kirbach
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him?-Obi-Wan KenobiWhen Harry S. Plinkett uploaded a review of Star Wars: Episode I-The Phantom Menace to YouTube in 2009, he became a brand of Internet celebrity. It is difficult, however, to detach "review" from rather large scare quotes. Posted in seven parts, Plinkett's rant is as smart as it is genre-bending. Yoking audio commentary to film theory, the review ostensibly takes the shape of a nonfiction video essay: a detailed, scene-by-scene analysis of the CGI-saturated Star Wars prequel. But simultaneously, as if unable to sustain the necessary level of repression, the review fractures into the narrative of Plinkett himself-a wheelchair-bound centenarian who murders his wives, actively abducts people, and offers to mail Totino's Pizza Rolls to viewers who comment on his "webzone." Plinkett is a fictional character, voiced by independent filmmaker Mike Stoklasa and produced by Stoklasa's Milwaukee-based RedLetterMedia. RLM's website boasts many short films and webseries, but the Plinkett reviews are among the most highly anticipated.1 Plinkett's takedown of The Phantom Menace alone has received more than five million views on YouTube, and was even screened at the CPH PIX film festival in Denmark ("Mike's Coming"). Through Plinkett, Stoklasa stitches his reviews together using schizophrenic metalepsis and intentionally awkward editing. Overlaying tropes from video essay, mockumentary, mash-up, and even horror, Plinkett blurs the line between art and armchair criticism. And at seventy minutes, The Phantom Menace review is, by most accounts, a feature-length film unto itself. By recontextualizing supplemental footage and other Star Wars marketing material, Plinkett is a subversive response to a garishly overcommoditized film industry. His reviews are evidence that cultural producers do not possess ultimate control over the identities of their products. Stoklasa moreover uses a "deranged" mind as the template for defamiliarizing the hegemonic logic of consumerism. Psychosis is figured as a form of catharsis in response to the colossal disappointment of the Star Wars prequels, but it is simultaneously a form of critique. By fictionalizing his critic, Stoklasa reveals the lengths to which criticism is not merely derivative, but generative-a "productive mutation," as media critics Anne Burdick et al. might call it (11), detourned from extant cultural forms and morphed into an eclectic performance of argument."Star Wars: The Phantom Menace was the most disappointing thing since my son," Plinkett begins. "And while my son eventually hanged himself in the bathroom of the gas station, the unfortunate reality of the Star Wars prequels is that they'll be around. Forever" (Stoklasa, Episode I). These opening lines of The Phantom Menace review attest to the indelible inscription of Star Wars upon our cultural imaginary, just as the figure of paternal authority might enroll us into a drama of imminent
谁更愚蠢,傻瓜还是跟着他的傻瓜?2009年,哈利·s·普林克特(Harry S. Plinkett)在YouTube上上传了一篇《星球大战前传1:幽灵的威胁》的影评后,他成为了网红。然而,很难将“评论”与相当大的惊吓引号分开。这篇文章分七个部分发表,普林克特的咆哮既聪明又不失体裁。这篇评论将音频评论与电影理论结合在一起,表面上看起来像是一篇非虚构的视频文章:对这部充斥着cgi图像的《星球大战》前传进行了详细的、逐场景的分析。但与此同时,似乎无法维持必要的压制水平,评论分裂成对普林克特本人的叙述——一个坐在轮椅上的百岁老人,谋杀他的妻子,积极绑架人,并主动将托蒂诺的披萨卷邮寄给评论他的“网络区域”的观众。Plinkett是一个虚构的角色,由独立电影制作人Mike Stoklasa配音,由Stoklasa位于密尔沃基的RedLetterMedia制作。RLM的网站上有很多短片和网络连续剧,但普林克特的评论是最受期待的光是普林克特的《幽灵的威胁》就在YouTube上获得了超过500万的浏览量,甚至还在丹麦的CPH PIX电影节上放映了(“迈克的到来”)。通过普林克特,斯托克拉萨将他的评论用精神分裂症式的幻觉和故意的尴尬剪辑拼接在一起。从视频散文,伪纪录片,混搭,甚至恐怖的比喻,普林克特模糊了艺术和纸上谈的批评之间的界限。《幽灵的威胁》的影评时长为70分钟,从大多数人的角度来看,它本身就是一部长片。通过将补充镜头和其他《星球大战》营销材料重新置于背景中,普林克特对过度商品化的电影工业做出了颠覆性的回应。他的评论证明,文化生产者对其产品的身份并没有最终的控制权。此外,斯托克拉萨还以“精神错乱”为模板,对消费主义的霸权逻辑进行了陌生化。精神错乱被认为是对《星球大战》前传的巨大失望的一种宣泄,但同时也是一种批评。通过虚构他的批评家,斯托克拉萨揭示了批评不仅是衍生的,而且是产生的——正如媒体评论家安妮·伯迪克等人所说的那样(11),一种“生产性突变”,偏离了现存的文化形式,演变成一种折衷的争论表现。“《星球大战:幽灵的威胁》是我儿子之后最令人失望的电影,”普林克特开始说。“虽然我儿子最终在加油站的浴室里上吊自杀了,但《星球大战》前传的不幸现实是,它们将一直存在。《幽灵的威胁》的开篇几句话证明了星球大战在我们的文化想象中不可磨灭的烙印,就像父亲权威的形象可能会把我们卷入一场即将被阉割的戏剧一样。但是《星球大战》电影怎么会如此令人失望呢?就个人经验而言,我不记得第一次看原版三部曲是什么时候。我的身份是建立在已经看到它的基础上的。我怀疑对于许多70后来说都是如此。然而,即使你从未看过《星球大战》,你也可能知道达斯·维德是卢克·天行者的父亲,就像你可能知道那句俏皮话一样:“愿原力与你同在。”在过去的半个世纪里,《星球大战》在美国神话中备受推崇,它的叙事融入了共同的文化经历。因此,有人可能会说,当乔治·卢卡斯在20世纪90年代开始创作前传三部曲时,它根本不可能达到粉丝的期望。事实上,人们对新电影的抨击并不少。例如,全CGI角色加·加·宾克斯(Jar Jar Binks)一直是许多人嘲笑的焦点,就像假设中氯仿体是力敏的物质基础一样。…
{"title":"Critical Psychosis: Genre, Détournement, and Critique in Mr. Plinkett's Star Wars Reviews","authors":"Benjamin Kirbach","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1430","url":null,"abstract":"Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him?-Obi-Wan KenobiWhen Harry S. Plinkett uploaded a review of Star Wars: Episode I-The Phantom Menace to YouTube in 2009, he became a brand of Internet celebrity. It is difficult, however, to detach \"review\" from rather large scare quotes. Posted in seven parts, Plinkett's rant is as smart as it is genre-bending. Yoking audio commentary to film theory, the review ostensibly takes the shape of a nonfiction video essay: a detailed, scene-by-scene analysis of the CGI-saturated Star Wars prequel. But simultaneously, as if unable to sustain the necessary level of repression, the review fractures into the narrative of Plinkett himself-a wheelchair-bound centenarian who murders his wives, actively abducts people, and offers to mail Totino's Pizza Rolls to viewers who comment on his \"webzone.\" Plinkett is a fictional character, voiced by independent filmmaker Mike Stoklasa and produced by Stoklasa's Milwaukee-based RedLetterMedia. RLM's website boasts many short films and webseries, but the Plinkett reviews are among the most highly anticipated.1 Plinkett's takedown of The Phantom Menace alone has received more than five million views on YouTube, and was even screened at the CPH PIX film festival in Denmark (\"Mike's Coming\"). Through Plinkett, Stoklasa stitches his reviews together using schizophrenic metalepsis and intentionally awkward editing. Overlaying tropes from video essay, mockumentary, mash-up, and even horror, Plinkett blurs the line between art and armchair criticism. And at seventy minutes, The Phantom Menace review is, by most accounts, a feature-length film unto itself. By recontextualizing supplemental footage and other Star Wars marketing material, Plinkett is a subversive response to a garishly overcommoditized film industry. His reviews are evidence that cultural producers do not possess ultimate control over the identities of their products. Stoklasa moreover uses a \"deranged\" mind as the template for defamiliarizing the hegemonic logic of consumerism. Psychosis is figured as a form of catharsis in response to the colossal disappointment of the Star Wars prequels, but it is simultaneously a form of critique. By fictionalizing his critic, Stoklasa reveals the lengths to which criticism is not merely derivative, but generative-a \"productive mutation,\" as media critics Anne Burdick et al. might call it (11), detourned from extant cultural forms and morphed into an eclectic performance of argument.\"Star Wars: The Phantom Menace was the most disappointing thing since my son,\" Plinkett begins. \"And while my son eventually hanged himself in the bathroom of the gas station, the unfortunate reality of the Star Wars prequels is that they'll be around. Forever\" (Stoklasa, Episode I). These opening lines of The Phantom Menace review attest to the indelible inscription of Star Wars upon our cultural imaginary, just as the figure of paternal authority might enroll us into a drama of imminent","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124122626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Flow of Narrative: Misleading Structures and Uncertain Faiths in Wieland 叙述的流动:维兰德的误导结构和不确定的信仰
Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1436
Justin Cosner
Misleading CausalityIn the last years of the eighteenth century, Charles Brockden-Brown wrote the first major American Gothic novel, reworking a famous criminal case of arson and murder into a dizzying narrative of mystery, religious fanaticism, and the inexplicable. Beyond these interests in uncertainty, much of the novel's notorious difficulty stems from its fractured narrative, rendering it more a series of set-pieces than a cohesive story. The first set-piece is Wieland Sr.'s solitary temple, built on a hill of the property to which he retreated from religious persecution in Europe, which subsequently recalls the formative imagery of Winthrop's "shining city on a hill". Yet while there is indeed an inexplicable luminescence in Wieland's temple, it is not that of radiant peace but in fact, the flicker which preempts a mysterious conflagration, a spontaneous combustion which kills the elder Wieland. This unexplained event and the temple of lonely meditation which houses it models some of the complex interactions between belief, uncertainty, and violence in the text even as the optimistic ideologies of American destiny and Enlightenment progress are called into question.The novel's Gothic qualities question such totalizing structures as Brown reworked the Gothic form to fit the US landscape and the conflicts inherent to its expansionist and Enlightenment projects. Lacking the castles and cathedrals of Europe and the political or religious controversies which haunt them. Brown defends his alterations, dismissing the "[pjuerile superstition and exploded manners. Gothic castles and chimeras," of European practitioners and instead invokes "incidents of Indian hostility, and the perils of the Western wilderness, [as] far more suitable" subjects for Americans (Brown, Edgar Huntlv 3). But despite dismissing chimeras and super- stitions, which suggests a skeptic's disenchantment of the Gothic world, Brown's oeuvre manifests a striking, critical approach toward the comfortable rationalist subject. Indeed, supernatural forces and even madness hover at the fringes of civilization and the civilized. Far from evacuating the Gothic of the power of irrational and supernatural forces, Wieland describes the susceptibility of figures of comfortable surety and provokes an acceptance of uncertainty, and the possibility of an accompanying faith, as necessary qualities of openness to non-material values and to others. But the primary way in which Brown's Gothic poses an uncertain alternative to totalizing and concreted structures of certainty comes in the manner of the story's telling, the text's meticulously reconstructed narration by Clara, which clashes with the thematic interest in Gothic ambiguities.Wieland Sr.'s death left his two children, Clara and her brother, the younger Wieland, each half the property, including that lonely temple which they convert into an outdoor parlor for company and lively talk. But their group's educated society is marred by inexplic
误导因果关系在18世纪的最后几年,查尔斯·布罗克登-布朗写出了美国第一部重要的哥特小说,将一个著名的纵火和谋杀的刑事案件重新改编成一个令人眼花缭乱的神秘、宗教狂热和无法解释的故事。除了这些对不确定性的兴趣之外,这部小说臭名昭著的困难主要来自于它支离破碎的叙事,使它更像是一系列的固定套路,而不是一个连贯的故事。第一个场景是老威兰孤零零的寺庙,这座寺庙建在一座小山上,是他在欧洲躲避宗教迫害的地方,后来让人想起温斯洛普“山巅闪耀之城”的形象。然而,虽然在维兰的寺庙里确实有一种无法解释的发光,但它并不是光芒四射的和平,而是事实上,一种闪烁,它预示着一场神秘的大火,一场杀死老维兰的自燃。这个无法解释的事件和它所在的孤独冥想的寺庙,在文本中模拟了信仰,不确定性和暴力之间的一些复杂的相互作用,即使美国命运的乐观意识形态和启蒙运动的进步受到质疑。小说的哥特特质质疑了这种整体结构,因为布朗重新设计了哥特形式,以适应美国的景观,以及其扩张主义和启蒙运动所固有的冲突。没有欧洲的城堡和教堂,也没有困扰他们的政治或宗教争议。布朗为他的改变辩护,驳斥了“幼稚的迷信和爆炸的举止”。哥特城堡和奇美拉”,而不是引用“印第安人的敌意事件和西部荒野的危险”,作为更适合美国人的主题(布朗,埃德加·亨特夫)。但是,尽管摒弃了奇美拉和迷信,这表明怀疑论者对哥特世界的觉醒,布朗的全部作品对舒适的理性主义主题表现出一种惊人的、批判性的态度。的确,超自然的力量甚至疯狂徘徊在文明和文明人的边缘。威兰并没有将哥特风格从非理性和超自然力量的力量中解脱出来,而是描述了舒适可靠的人物的敏感性,并激发了对不确定性的接受,以及伴随信仰的可能性,作为对非物质价值和他人开放的必要品质。但是布朗的哥特小说提出了一种不确定的替代方案而不是确定性的整体和具体结构的主要方式来自于故事的讲述方式,克拉拉对文本的精心重构的叙述,这与哥特式模棱两可的主题兴趣相冲突。老威兰去世后,留给他的两个孩子克拉拉和她的弟弟小威兰各一半财产,包括那座孤零零的寺庙,他们把它改成了一个户外客厅,供人们做伴和愉快地交谈。但他们群体的受教育社会被无法解释的声音所破坏,这些声音使他们感到困惑和担忧,因为这些声音似乎来自不可能的距离或不在场的说话者。不久之后,他们的小组被介绍给一个神秘的流浪者,卡文,克拉拉发现迷人的。神秘的声音开始威胁克拉拉,她两次听到他们在衣橱门后密谋,更糟糕的是,他们对小威兰起了作用,他继承了父亲的强迫症,尽管他受到启蒙哲学的影响。在他认为是上帝的指引下,维兰杀死了他的家人,并未能成功地袭击了他的妹妹,只是被卡文的声音所吸引,卡文刚刚告诉克拉拉他是一个有天赋的口技家。小说的结尾是维兰被捕,卡文承认用他的超能力戏弄了这群人,甚至利用超能力在他们中间偷偷摸摸地活动,但他坚决否认曾给维兰下达过杀人的命令或理由。威兰的疯狂和/或超自然力量在文本中的可能性,被理性主义的家庭朋友普雷耶尔所争议,普雷耶尔在小说的结尾娶了克拉拉。...
{"title":"The Flow of Narrative: Misleading Structures and Uncertain Faiths in Wieland","authors":"Justin Cosner","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1436","url":null,"abstract":"Misleading CausalityIn the last years of the eighteenth century, Charles Brockden-Brown wrote the first major American Gothic novel, reworking a famous criminal case of arson and murder into a dizzying narrative of mystery, religious fanaticism, and the inexplicable. Beyond these interests in uncertainty, much of the novel's notorious difficulty stems from its fractured narrative, rendering it more a series of set-pieces than a cohesive story. The first set-piece is Wieland Sr.'s solitary temple, built on a hill of the property to which he retreated from religious persecution in Europe, which subsequently recalls the formative imagery of Winthrop's \"shining city on a hill\". Yet while there is indeed an inexplicable luminescence in Wieland's temple, it is not that of radiant peace but in fact, the flicker which preempts a mysterious conflagration, a spontaneous combustion which kills the elder Wieland. This unexplained event and the temple of lonely meditation which houses it models some of the complex interactions between belief, uncertainty, and violence in the text even as the optimistic ideologies of American destiny and Enlightenment progress are called into question.The novel's Gothic qualities question such totalizing structures as Brown reworked the Gothic form to fit the US landscape and the conflicts inherent to its expansionist and Enlightenment projects. Lacking the castles and cathedrals of Europe and the political or religious controversies which haunt them. Brown defends his alterations, dismissing the \"[pjuerile superstition and exploded manners. Gothic castles and chimeras,\" of European practitioners and instead invokes \"incidents of Indian hostility, and the perils of the Western wilderness, [as] far more suitable\" subjects for Americans (Brown, Edgar Huntlv 3). But despite dismissing chimeras and super- stitions, which suggests a skeptic's disenchantment of the Gothic world, Brown's oeuvre manifests a striking, critical approach toward the comfortable rationalist subject. Indeed, supernatural forces and even madness hover at the fringes of civilization and the civilized. Far from evacuating the Gothic of the power of irrational and supernatural forces, Wieland describes the susceptibility of figures of comfortable surety and provokes an acceptance of uncertainty, and the possibility of an accompanying faith, as necessary qualities of openness to non-material values and to others. But the primary way in which Brown's Gothic poses an uncertain alternative to totalizing and concreted structures of certainty comes in the manner of the story's telling, the text's meticulously reconstructed narration by Clara, which clashes with the thematic interest in Gothic ambiguities.Wieland Sr.'s death left his two children, Clara and her brother, the younger Wieland, each half the property, including that lonely temple which they convert into an outdoor parlor for company and lively talk. But their group's educated society is marred by inexplic","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115438584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction: (Mis)Leading 介绍:(Mis)领导
Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1449
Miriam Janechek, D. Kennedy
This special issue of the Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies marries together two of the most important aspects of graduate student development - conference participation and publication. To celebrate the high standard of scholarship produced by graduate students at not only the University of Iowa but also schools around the nation, the Journal created a special issue specifically for scholars who present at the Craft Critique Culture Conference. This conference, hosted by the English department graduate students at the University of Iowa, offers graduate students the unique opportunity to present research as well as creative writing and art. This issue is the first time the three have come together, and it is an exemplar of the high quality work graduate students generate.The Craft Critique Culture Conference is in its fifteenth year as a graduate student-run organization. It has a long tradition of creative, innovative conference themes as well as attracting brilliant senior scholars to participate as keynote speakers. The 2014 CCC collected together presenters under the theme "Mis-Leading" and brought Dr. Marah Gubar to Iowa. Dr. Gubar, herself an enthusiastic supporter of graduate student work, offered a unique keynote address that worked through the complexities and rewards of forging new paths in scholarship, a path she called the "third way." Her talk encouraged young scholars to trust their instincts about the texts they work with and their personal reactions to scholarship they read. It is in those reactions, she argued, that one can find something different and new to bring to the conversation. In the spirit of her talk, Journal editors took to the conference panels to identify strong papers that create new ways in scholarship.Following the theme of the conference, the articles collected here each illustrate a new way of considering literature, historical events, or contemporary culture that illuminate complexities, demonstrate misleading assumptions, and engage "third ways." For example, Justin Cosner engages with the misleading representations of religious faith in Charles Brockden-Brown's Wieland, arguing that the text illuminates a larger critique of the impulse to assert religious certainty and totalizing rational understanding of the world in nineteenth-century America. Turning to more contemporary literature, Faith Avery's discussion of Toni Morrison's Tar Baby argues for the misleading nature of selfishness throughout the novel. Avery argues that Morrison's readers are asked to question whether selfishness in the name of individuality is akin to "selling out" in the case of the novel's protagonist, Jadine. Avery points out how this misleading contradiction allows Morrison to direct ethical examination in the novel toward issues of racial and cultural re-appropriation. Together, these articles present the importance of questioning typical or mainstream critical narratives as each demonstrates the way scholarship can redirected from
这期《爱荷华文化研究杂志》的特刊结合了研究生发展的两个最重要的方面——参加会议和发表文章。为了庆祝爱荷华大学和全国其他学校的研究生所创造的高水平奖学金,《华尔街日报》专门为参加工艺评论文化会议的学者们制作了一期特刊。本次会议由爱荷华大学英语系研究生主办,为研究生提供了展示研究、创意写作和艺术的独特机会。这是三者第一次结合在一起,它是研究生产生高质量工作的典范。作为一个研究生组织,工艺评论文化会议已经是第15个年头了。它具有创新、创新的会议主题,并吸引杰出的资深学者作为主题演讲者参加的悠久传统。2014年CCC以“误导”为主题召集了演讲者,并将Marah Gubar博士带到爱荷华州。古巴尔博士本人是研究生工作的热心支持者,她发表了一个独特的主题演讲,阐述了在学术领域开辟新道路的复杂性和回报,她称之为“第三条道路”。她的演讲鼓励年轻的学者相信他们对自己研究的文本的直觉,以及他们对所读学术成果的个人反应。她认为,正是在这些反应中,人们可以找到一些不同的、新的东西来加入谈话。本着她的演讲精神,《华尔街日报》的编辑们参加了会议小组讨论,以确定在学术领域开辟新道路的优秀论文。按照会议的主题,这里收集的每一篇文章都阐述了一种新的方式来看待文学、历史事件或当代文化,这些方式阐明了复杂性,证明了误导性的假设,并参与了“第三种方式”。例如,贾斯汀·科斯纳对查尔斯·布罗克登-布朗的《维兰》一书中对宗教信仰的误导性表述进行了研究,他认为,这本书阐明了对19世纪美国主张宗教确定性和对世界总体理性理解的冲动的更大批评。谈到更当代的文学作品,费斯·艾弗里(Faith Avery)对托妮·莫里森(Toni Morrison)的《柏油娃娃》(Tar Baby)的讨论,论证了贯穿整部小说的自私的误导本质。艾弗里认为,莫里森的读者被要求质疑,以个性为名的自私,是否类似于小说主人公杰丁(Jadine)的“出卖”。艾弗里指出,这种误导性的矛盾如何使莫里森在小说中将伦理审查导向种族和文化再占有的问题。总之,这些文章展示了质疑典型或主流批评叙事的重要性,因为每一篇文章都展示了学术可以从对文学和文化的误导性理解中重新定位的方式。…
{"title":"Introduction: (Mis)Leading","authors":"Miriam Janechek, D. Kennedy","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1449","url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies marries together two of the most important aspects of graduate student development - conference participation and publication. To celebrate the high standard of scholarship produced by graduate students at not only the University of Iowa but also schools around the nation, the Journal created a special issue specifically for scholars who present at the Craft Critique Culture Conference. This conference, hosted by the English department graduate students at the University of Iowa, offers graduate students the unique opportunity to present research as well as creative writing and art. This issue is the first time the three have come together, and it is an exemplar of the high quality work graduate students generate.The Craft Critique Culture Conference is in its fifteenth year as a graduate student-run organization. It has a long tradition of creative, innovative conference themes as well as attracting brilliant senior scholars to participate as keynote speakers. The 2014 CCC collected together presenters under the theme \"Mis-Leading\" and brought Dr. Marah Gubar to Iowa. Dr. Gubar, herself an enthusiastic supporter of graduate student work, offered a unique keynote address that worked through the complexities and rewards of forging new paths in scholarship, a path she called the \"third way.\" Her talk encouraged young scholars to trust their instincts about the texts they work with and their personal reactions to scholarship they read. It is in those reactions, she argued, that one can find something different and new to bring to the conversation. In the spirit of her talk, Journal editors took to the conference panels to identify strong papers that create new ways in scholarship.Following the theme of the conference, the articles collected here each illustrate a new way of considering literature, historical events, or contemporary culture that illuminate complexities, demonstrate misleading assumptions, and engage \"third ways.\" For example, Justin Cosner engages with the misleading representations of religious faith in Charles Brockden-Brown's Wieland, arguing that the text illuminates a larger critique of the impulse to assert religious certainty and totalizing rational understanding of the world in nineteenth-century America. Turning to more contemporary literature, Faith Avery's discussion of Toni Morrison's Tar Baby argues for the misleading nature of selfishness throughout the novel. Avery argues that Morrison's readers are asked to question whether selfishness in the name of individuality is akin to \"selling out\" in the case of the novel's protagonist, Jadine. Avery points out how this misleading contradiction allows Morrison to direct ethical examination in the novel toward issues of racial and cultural re-appropriation. Together, these articles present the importance of questioning typical or mainstream critical narratives as each demonstrates the way scholarship can redirected from","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125313389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"We are alive": (Mis)Reading Joy Harjo's Noni Daylight as a Yellow Woman “我们还活着”:(误读)乔伊·哈乔的《作为一个黄女人的诺丽·日光》
Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1437
Chelsea D. Burk
Running on the Edge of the Rainbow, a 1978 film produced by the University of Arizona, opens with Leslie Marmon Silko sitting on a porch swing, regaling an audience of three with a version of her poem "Storyteller." The poem features three versions of the Yellow Woman, a figure who originates in the Keres Pueblo oral tradition. Delighted giggles punctuate Silko's words, echoing the story's playfulness. As Silko's voice fades, the camera zooms in, framing the storyteller and her fellow porch-swinger, Joy Harjo, whose laughter trails the tale. The film intimates the strong connection to storytelling that binds Silko and Harjo. Harjo named Silko as a particular influence early in her literary career as she added poetry to her artistic repertoire (Bruchac 228).1 Literary criticism that discusses the two artists, however, has surprisingly not followed suit. Beyond comparing Silko and Harjo as women writers of native descent, with some emphasis on thematic overlaps, critics have yet to sustain an exploration into Silko's influence upon Harjo's poetry as contemporary writers interrogating gender norms to which dominant culture and the presiding feminism (also called "sisterhood feminism") adhere in the immediate aftermath of the late twentieth-century's women's liberation movement.2By drawing out Noni Daylight's Yellow Woman characteristics, I hope to illuminate another layer of complexity in Harjo's early poetry, which current scholarship predominately overlooks. I also aim to reify the importance of Yellow Woman and Noni Daylight for feminist literary scholarship and teaching. In the midst of sisterhood feminism's universalizing rhetoric that privileged a white liberal agenda, Silko and Harjo approach womanhood as polyvocal and uniquely situated. Like the Yellow Women in Silko's oeuvre, the Noni Daylights of Harjo's poetry insist that wom- en must learn how to tell one's story in order to reject both the normative narratives Anglo-American culture projects that restrict women's sexual expression and the counter-narratives posited by mainstream feminists.3 Noni Daylight and Yellow Woman exist between the phenomenology of their lived experiences and the storytelling event. Somewhere among the differences and similarities that attend each story they tell as representations of the culturally-inflected idea of "woman," Noni Daylight and Yellow Woman legitimize women's unsaid and previously unsayable encounters. In so doing, Yellow Woman and Noni Daylight assert that each woman's experiences, as they simultaneously reflect and reject normative gender narratives, deserve listening. They employ a poetics of survivance, a concept with which Gerald Vizenor describes interventions by people of native descent into dominant identity politics and the inextricable lived violences that accompany colonization. Silko and Harjo's figures, like mainstream feminism, reject exceptionalism in favor of community, but do not repeat sisterhood feminist's liberal homogenizing i
1978年由亚利桑那大学(University of Arizona)制作的电影《在彩虹的边缘奔跑》(Running on the Edge of the Rainbow)一开始,莱斯利·马蒙·西尔科(Leslie Marmon Silko)坐在门廊的秋千上,用她的诗歌《说书人》(Storyteller)的版本取悦三个观众。这首诗有三个版本的黄女人,一个来自克雷斯普韦布洛口述传统的人物。西尔科的话中不时传来欢快的笑声,呼应着故事的趣味性。随着西尔科的声音逐渐消失,镜头拉近,镜头对准了讲故事的人和她的同伴乔伊·哈乔(Joy Harjo),后者的笑声伴随着故事的发展。这部电影将西尔科和哈乔的故事情节紧密联系在一起。哈乔认为西尔科在她早期的文学生涯中对她有特别的影响,因为她把诗歌加入了她的艺术曲目中(Bruchac 228)然而,讨论这两位艺术家的文学评论却令人惊讶地没有效仿。除了将西尔科和哈乔作为本土女性作家进行比较,并强调主题重叠之外,评论家们还没有继续探索西尔科对哈乔诗歌的影响,因为当代作家质疑在20世纪后期妇女解放运动之后,主流文化和主导的女权主义(也称为“姐妹女权主义”)所坚持的性别规范。通过描绘诺丽·日光的《黄女人》的特点,我希望阐明哈条早期诗歌的另一层复杂性,这是目前学术界主要忽视的。同时,我也想要强调《黄色女人》和《诺丽日光》对于女性主义文学研究和教学的重要性。在姐妹女权主义的普遍化修辞中,白人自由主义议程享有特权,西尔科和哈乔将女性视为多音和独特的位置。就像西尔科作品中的黄女人一样,哈乔诗歌中的诺丽之光坚持认为,女性必须学会如何讲述自己的故事,以拒绝限制女性性表达的英美文化项目的规范叙事和主流女权主义者所设定的反叙事《诺丽·日光》和《黄女人》存在于她们生活经历的现象学和叙事事件之间。她们讲述的每一个故事都表现了受文化影响的“女人”概念,在这些故事的异同之处,《诺丽·日光》和《黄女人》使女性未说的和以前不可说的遭遇合法化了。通过这种方式,《黄女人》和《诺妮·日光》断言,每个女性的经历都值得倾听,因为她们同时反映和拒绝了规范的性别叙事。他们采用了一种生存的诗学,杰拉德·维泽诺用这个概念来描述土著后裔对主流身份政治的干预,以及伴随殖民而来的不可分割的生活暴力。西尔科和哈乔笔下的人物,和主流女权主义一样,反对例外论,支持群体,但不重复姐妹女权主义的自由同质化冲动。诺丽的《日光》和《黄女人》都延伸、矛盾和妥协了主流美国文化和自由女权主义反主流文化对女性的定义。她们以激进的不和谐的声音大声疾呼,扩大了女权主义叙事的定义,扩大了值得讲述的故事的定义。历史背景:谁和诺丽·日光一起做夜骑士?西尔科在1981年的回忆录《讲故事的人》(Storyteller)中展示了她对黄女人(也被称为Kochininako)的描述,在西尔科的作品中,批判性的对话充斥着对她的反思。“黄女人”这个名字不仅指一个特定的女人,而且大致翻译为“女人-女人”:在普韦布洛传统中,黄色代表女人,就像粉红色和蓝色在盎格鲁-欧洲裔美国人中意味着性别一样(Allen 88)。与《诺丽·日光》的学术研究相比,伴随西尔科《黄女人》旅程的批评主要是赞美她的细微差别。伊丽莎白霍夫曼尼尔森和马尔科姆A. ...
{"title":"\"We are alive\": (Mis)Reading Joy Harjo's Noni Daylight as a Yellow Woman","authors":"Chelsea D. Burk","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1437","url":null,"abstract":"Running on the Edge of the Rainbow, a 1978 film produced by the University of Arizona, opens with Leslie Marmon Silko sitting on a porch swing, regaling an audience of three with a version of her poem \"Storyteller.\" The poem features three versions of the Yellow Woman, a figure who originates in the Keres Pueblo oral tradition. Delighted giggles punctuate Silko's words, echoing the story's playfulness. As Silko's voice fades, the camera zooms in, framing the storyteller and her fellow porch-swinger, Joy Harjo, whose laughter trails the tale. The film intimates the strong connection to storytelling that binds Silko and Harjo. Harjo named Silko as a particular influence early in her literary career as she added poetry to her artistic repertoire (Bruchac 228).1 Literary criticism that discusses the two artists, however, has surprisingly not followed suit. Beyond comparing Silko and Harjo as women writers of native descent, with some emphasis on thematic overlaps, critics have yet to sustain an exploration into Silko's influence upon Harjo's poetry as contemporary writers interrogating gender norms to which dominant culture and the presiding feminism (also called \"sisterhood feminism\") adhere in the immediate aftermath of the late twentieth-century's women's liberation movement.2By drawing out Noni Daylight's Yellow Woman characteristics, I hope to illuminate another layer of complexity in Harjo's early poetry, which current scholarship predominately overlooks. I also aim to reify the importance of Yellow Woman and Noni Daylight for feminist literary scholarship and teaching. In the midst of sisterhood feminism's universalizing rhetoric that privileged a white liberal agenda, Silko and Harjo approach womanhood as polyvocal and uniquely situated. Like the Yellow Women in Silko's oeuvre, the Noni Daylights of Harjo's poetry insist that wom- en must learn how to tell one's story in order to reject both the normative narratives Anglo-American culture projects that restrict women's sexual expression and the counter-narratives posited by mainstream feminists.3 Noni Daylight and Yellow Woman exist between the phenomenology of their lived experiences and the storytelling event. Somewhere among the differences and similarities that attend each story they tell as representations of the culturally-inflected idea of \"woman,\" Noni Daylight and Yellow Woman legitimize women's unsaid and previously unsayable encounters. In so doing, Yellow Woman and Noni Daylight assert that each woman's experiences, as they simultaneously reflect and reject normative gender narratives, deserve listening. They employ a poetics of survivance, a concept with which Gerald Vizenor describes interventions by people of native descent into dominant identity politics and the inextricable lived violences that accompany colonization. Silko and Harjo's figures, like mainstream feminism, reject exceptionalism in favor of community, but do not repeat sisterhood feminist's liberal homogenizing i","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115426408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
"Let Loose the Dogs": Messiness and Ethical Wrangling in Toni Morrison's Tar Baby 《放狗》:托妮·莫里森《柏油娃娃》中的混乱和伦理争论
Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1434
F. Avery
As Toni Morrison's 1981 novel, Tar Baby, draws to a close and the tension between the central characters, Jadine and Son, reaches its peak, the omniscient narration voices the questions that Morrison's readers have been grappling with since the novel's opening pages: "One had a past, the other a future and each one bore the culture to save the race in his hands. Mama-spoiled black man, will you mature with me? Culture bearing black woman, whose culture are you bearing?" (269). Much of the initial critical conversation concerning Tar Baby revolves around efforts to determine where the reader's sentiments should lie. Are we to sympathize with Son, a sensitive man deeply attuned to his "ancient properties," whose concern with black folk values, community, and ancestral heritage are primary to his personal identity?1 Or, are we to invest in Jadine, the highly educated black model-the epitome of colonized beauty-who all but rejects her heritage and ancestry as incompatible with the fast-paced, modern, lifestyle that she associates with success? The conflicting forces at work within Tar Baby are, indeed, complex and frustrating. The novel's conclusion-in which Jadine returns to Paris, ostensibly to resume her glamorous lifestyle while Son runs, "lickety-split," away with the mythic blind and naked horsemen on the Isle des Chevaliers-provides no definitive answers (306). The fates of Son and Jadine do not satisfy the desire for a final statement about the possibility (or lack thereof) for reconciliation between modern expectations of Western "sophistication" and black cultural tradition. However, the call for a clear resolution to the novel is reductive. Toni Morrison's postmodern technique is such that it never resolves.2 Rather, she consistently pushes her reader toward further ethical wrangling, insisting upon the reader's obligation to struggle with the moral issues at hand.3 With this in mind, Jadine may not only be read as exemplary of the challenges to black identity in a post civil rights moment of racial "arrival"-in which civil rights such as equity and equality in the work force, education, etc. are advertised and celebrated as having been completely attained-but she also allows Morrison to confront notions of racial "selling out" that have been historically, and still remain, prominent within the African American community. It seems as though Jadine's final departure to Europe indicates a choice of selfishness and therein racial betrayal. However, selfishness is valenced throughout the novel in such a way that it requires Jadine and Morrison's readers to question whether selfishness in the name of autonomous selfhood is, in fact, synonymous with "selling out." This disorienting contradiction allows Morrison to direct both Jadine's and her reader's continued ethical examination toward issues of racial and cultural re-approachment as opposed to reading Jadine's departure to Europe as definitive racial betrayal.Randall Kennedy closely explores
托尼·莫里森(Toni Morrison) 1981年的小说《柏油娃娃》(Tar Baby)接近尾声,主人公贾丁(Jadine)和儿子(Son)之间的紧张关系达到顶峰,无所不知的叙述道出了莫里森的读者从小说开头就一直在纠结的问题:“一个有过去,另一个有未来,每个人手中都有拯救种族的文化。”被妈妈宠坏的黑人,你愿意和我一起成熟吗?黑人女性的文化,你接受的是谁的文化?”(269)。最初关于《柏油娃娃》的批评性讨论,大多围绕着确定读者的情感应该在哪里展开。我们应该同情孙正义吗?他是一个敏感的人,对自己的“古老属性”有着深刻的共鸣,他对黑人民间价值观、社区和祖先遗产的关注是他个人身份的首要因素。或者,我们应该投资杰丁(Jadine),这位受过高等教育的黑人模特——被殖民美的缩影——她几乎拒绝接受自己的遗产和血统,认为她与快节奏的现代生活方式不相容,而这种生活方式与成功联系在一起?在《柏油宝贝》中起作用的冲突力量确实是复杂而令人沮丧的。小说的结尾——贾丁回到巴黎,表面上恢复她迷人的生活方式,而儿子“飞快地”跑开了,和传说中的骑士岛上的盲人和裸体骑士一起——没有给出明确的答案(306页)。Son和Jadine的命运并没有满足人们对西方“成熟”的现代期望与黑人文化传统之间和解的可能性(或缺乏这种可能性)的最终陈述的愿望。然而,对小说的明确解决方案的呼吁是简化的。托妮·莫里森的后现代手法是这样的,它永远不会解决相反,她不断地将读者推向进一步的道德争论,坚持读者有义务与手头的道德问题作斗争考虑到这一点,杰丁不仅可以被视为种族“到来”的后民权时刻对黑人身份的挑战的典范——在这个时刻,诸如劳动力、教育等方面的公平和平等的民权被宣传和庆祝为已经完全实现——而且她还允许莫里森面对种族“出卖”的概念,这些概念在历史上一直存在,并且仍然存在,在非裔美国人社区中很突出。贾丁最后去欧洲似乎表明了她的自私和种族背叛。然而,自私自利在整部小说中都得到了重视,这就要求杰丁和莫里森的读者质疑,以自主的自我为名义的自私自利,实际上是否等同于“出卖”。这种令人困惑的矛盾使莫里森能够引导贾丁和她的读者对种族和文化重新接近的问题进行持续的伦理审查,而不是将贾丁的离开解读为最终的种族背叛。兰德尔·肯尼迪深入探讨了当代美国黑人“卖国”的概念。他不仅研究了“出卖”的含义,还挑战了20世纪后期以成就的名义这样做的普遍指责。某些职业,以及某些职业的某些要求,会引发出卖他人的指责(64)。也许使用出卖言论的最大问题“涉及确定什么是黑人的最大利益,以及实现有争议目标的最佳手段”(72)。因此,在某些情况下,对出卖的指控不太明确。肯尼迪注意到“出卖言论及其伴随的态度、姿态和策略会导致过度的自我审查,截断必要的辩论,并助长煽动”,他呼吁维持黑人的团结,以这种方式规范出卖言论,从而激发对种族背叛的深思熟虑(84)。在《柏油娃娃》中,莫里森表达了类似的道德困境,他拒绝将杰丁明确地定位为卖国者。...
{"title":"\"Let Loose the Dogs\": Messiness and Ethical Wrangling in Toni Morrison's Tar Baby","authors":"F. Avery","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1434","url":null,"abstract":"As Toni Morrison's 1981 novel, Tar Baby, draws to a close and the tension between the central characters, Jadine and Son, reaches its peak, the omniscient narration voices the questions that Morrison's readers have been grappling with since the novel's opening pages: \"One had a past, the other a future and each one bore the culture to save the race in his hands. Mama-spoiled black man, will you mature with me? Culture bearing black woman, whose culture are you bearing?\" (269). Much of the initial critical conversation concerning Tar Baby revolves around efforts to determine where the reader's sentiments should lie. Are we to sympathize with Son, a sensitive man deeply attuned to his \"ancient properties,\" whose concern with black folk values, community, and ancestral heritage are primary to his personal identity?1 Or, are we to invest in Jadine, the highly educated black model-the epitome of colonized beauty-who all but rejects her heritage and ancestry as incompatible with the fast-paced, modern, lifestyle that she associates with success? The conflicting forces at work within Tar Baby are, indeed, complex and frustrating. The novel's conclusion-in which Jadine returns to Paris, ostensibly to resume her glamorous lifestyle while Son runs, \"lickety-split,\" away with the mythic blind and naked horsemen on the Isle des Chevaliers-provides no definitive answers (306). The fates of Son and Jadine do not satisfy the desire for a final statement about the possibility (or lack thereof) for reconciliation between modern expectations of Western \"sophistication\" and black cultural tradition. However, the call for a clear resolution to the novel is reductive. Toni Morrison's postmodern technique is such that it never resolves.2 Rather, she consistently pushes her reader toward further ethical wrangling, insisting upon the reader's obligation to struggle with the moral issues at hand.3 With this in mind, Jadine may not only be read as exemplary of the challenges to black identity in a post civil rights moment of racial \"arrival\"-in which civil rights such as equity and equality in the work force, education, etc. are advertised and celebrated as having been completely attained-but she also allows Morrison to confront notions of racial \"selling out\" that have been historically, and still remain, prominent within the African American community. It seems as though Jadine's final departure to Europe indicates a choice of selfishness and therein racial betrayal. However, selfishness is valenced throughout the novel in such a way that it requires Jadine and Morrison's readers to question whether selfishness in the name of autonomous selfhood is, in fact, synonymous with \"selling out.\" This disorienting contradiction allows Morrison to direct both Jadine's and her reader's continued ethical examination toward issues of racial and cultural re-approachment as opposed to reading Jadine's departure to Europe as definitive racial betrayal.Randall Kennedy closely explores ","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117265526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pussy Riot vs. Civil Obedience: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Texts 暴动猫咪与公民服从:两篇文本的批判话语分析
Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1435
Volha Kananovich
In February 2012, at the height of that year's presidential campaign in Russia, a short video was uploaded to YouTube by a member of the Pussy Riot punk feminist band (Matveeva). The video featured four young women in brightly colored masks and short dresses in front of the altar of Russia's major Orthodox temple, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. Lifting their legs, kneeling and crossing themselves, the women lip-synced a "punk prayer" that they had set to the music of a sacred Orthodox song,1 in which they pleaded with the Virgin Mary to "drive Putin," who was running for his third presidential term, "away."The clip, which also contained scenes from an earlier Pussy Riot performance in another cathedral, lasted a little less than two minutes. It was nearly twice as long as the actual performance, a fact revealed five months later in court, in which three Pussy Riot members identified by the police as the participants of that performance - Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Mariya Alyokhina, and Ekaterina Samutsevich - were put on trial and charged with hooliganism motivated by religious hatred ("Opublikovano"). Heavily covered by the domestic and international media ("O Pussy Riot"), accompanied by mass protests ("Pussy Riot Supporters"), comments and appeals from government officials (Nakamura and Weiner) and public figures ("Madonna Urges Russia"; "Yoko Ono Awards") around the world, the trial ended in August 2012. The women were found guilty and sentenced to two years in a penal colony ("Prigovor").In October 2012, Samutsevich's term was converted into a suspended sentence (Tsoi and Ledniov). Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina were freed from prison three months before their scheduled release, in December 2013 ("Jailed Pussy Riot Activ- ists"). The reason for their release, as the Russian authorities emphasized, was a nationwide amnesty to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Russian constitution, but it was interpreted by the band members as a PR stunt ("Freed Pussy Riot Activists") before the Olympic Games that were hosted by Russia in February 2014.The timing and the multitude of the conflicting interpretations of the performance have transformed the Pussy Riot affair - using the term that that Chilton made famous - into a "critical discourse moment" (12) that put issues of religious satire, political critique, and the boundaries of free speech at the center of public discourse in Russia.The video footage itself, however, was far from remarkable in terms of the audience reached: two years after the performance, the number of views on YouTube did not exceed 3 million, a figure hardly comparable to that for videos considered viral (Broxton et al.). While the video footage did find its way to a wider audience by other means, such as TV broadcasts or pictures in newspapers, the lyrics were usually mentioned in passing, with references not going far beyond citing the title of the prayer. When demonstrated on mainstream Russian TV as part of the n
2012年2月,在俄罗斯总统竞选最激烈的时候,Pussy Riot朋克女权主义乐队(Matveeva)的一名成员将一段短视频上传到YouTube。视频中,四名年轻女子戴着色彩鲜艳的面具,身穿短裙,站在俄罗斯主要的东正教寺庙——莫斯科基督救世主大教堂的祭坛前。她们抬起腿,跪在地上,交叉着自己的手,假唱了一首“朋克祈祷文”,这首歌是她们为一首神圣的东正教歌曲谱曲的,她们在歌中恳求圣母玛利亚“赶走”正在竞选第三届总统任期的普京。这段视频持续了不到两分钟,其中还包括Pussy Riot乐队早些时候在另一座大教堂演出的场景。五个月后,法庭披露了这一事实,警方认定暴乱小猫乐队的三名成员——娜杰日达·托罗科尼科娃、玛丽亚·阿列希娜和叶卡捷琳娜·萨穆特塞维奇参与了那场演出,她们被控以宗教仇恨为动机的流氓罪受审(“Opublikovano”)。被国内外媒体大量报道(“O Pussy Riot”),伴随着大规模抗议(“Pussy Riot的支持者”),政府官员(中村和韦纳)和公众人物(“麦当娜敦促俄罗斯”;“小野洋子奖”),审判于2012年8月结束。这些妇女被判有罪,并被判处在一个流放地(“Prigovor”)服刑两年。2012年10月,Samutsevich的刑期被转为缓刑(Tsoi和Ledniov)。2013年12月,托洛科尼科娃和阿列希娜在预定释放前三个月获释(“被监禁的Pussy Riot活动分子”)。正如俄罗斯当局所强调的那样,释放她们的原因是为了纪念俄罗斯宪法颁布20周年而进行的全国特赦,但乐队成员将其解释为2014年2月俄罗斯举办奥运会之前的公关噱头(“释放Pussy Riot活动家”)。这场演出的时机和众多相互矛盾的解释已经把暴动猫咪事件——用奇尔顿出名的术语——变成了一个“关键话语时刻”(12),把宗教讽刺、政治批判和言论自由的边界问题放在了俄罗斯公共话语的中心。然而,视频片段本身在观众数量方面并不突出:演出两年后,YouTube上的观看次数不超过300万,这个数字很难与被认为是病毒式传播的视频相比(Broxton等人)。虽然视频片段确实通过电视广播或报纸上的图片等其他方式找到了更广泛的受众,但歌词通常是顺便提到的,除了引用祈祷的标题之外,没有太多的参考。当俄罗斯主流电视台在报道审判的新闻报道中播放表演视频时,伴奏的通常不是原声音乐,而是记者或专家的评论,他们通常认为这是亵渎神明的。表演中明显挑衅的视觉成分使其很容易成为这种解释的目标,这导致了对祈祷内容的忽视。法庭上提供了一份罕见的长篇祈祷文,由支持检察官案件(Feygin)的心理学和语言学专家撰写的21页报告(“Prigovor”)引用了这份报告。为了反驳Pussy Riot关于演出是政治批判的说法,并将演出的动机主要表现为宗教仇恨,专家们进行了复杂的语义分析,认为演出对俄罗斯社会来说显然是“不可接受的”,这使得该报告本身成为一个相当有趣的话语产物。…
{"title":"Pussy Riot vs. Civil Obedience: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Texts","authors":"Volha Kananovich","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1435","url":null,"abstract":"In February 2012, at the height of that year's presidential campaign in Russia, a short video was uploaded to YouTube by a member of the Pussy Riot punk feminist band (Matveeva). The video featured four young women in brightly colored masks and short dresses in front of the altar of Russia's major Orthodox temple, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. Lifting their legs, kneeling and crossing themselves, the women lip-synced a \"punk prayer\" that they had set to the music of a sacred Orthodox song,1 in which they pleaded with the Virgin Mary to \"drive Putin,\" who was running for his third presidential term, \"away.\"The clip, which also contained scenes from an earlier Pussy Riot performance in another cathedral, lasted a little less than two minutes. It was nearly twice as long as the actual performance, a fact revealed five months later in court, in which three Pussy Riot members identified by the police as the participants of that performance - Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Mariya Alyokhina, and Ekaterina Samutsevich - were put on trial and charged with hooliganism motivated by religious hatred (\"Opublikovano\"). Heavily covered by the domestic and international media (\"O Pussy Riot\"), accompanied by mass protests (\"Pussy Riot Supporters\"), comments and appeals from government officials (Nakamura and Weiner) and public figures (\"Madonna Urges Russia\"; \"Yoko Ono Awards\") around the world, the trial ended in August 2012. The women were found guilty and sentenced to two years in a penal colony (\"Prigovor\").In October 2012, Samutsevich's term was converted into a suspended sentence (Tsoi and Ledniov). Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina were freed from prison three months before their scheduled release, in December 2013 (\"Jailed Pussy Riot Activ- ists\"). The reason for their release, as the Russian authorities emphasized, was a nationwide amnesty to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Russian constitution, but it was interpreted by the band members as a PR stunt (\"Freed Pussy Riot Activists\") before the Olympic Games that were hosted by Russia in February 2014.The timing and the multitude of the conflicting interpretations of the performance have transformed the Pussy Riot affair - using the term that that Chilton made famous - into a \"critical discourse moment\" (12) that put issues of religious satire, political critique, and the boundaries of free speech at the center of public discourse in Russia.The video footage itself, however, was far from remarkable in terms of the audience reached: two years after the performance, the number of views on YouTube did not exceed 3 million, a figure hardly comparable to that for videos considered viral (Broxton et al.). While the video footage did find its way to a wider audience by other means, such as TV broadcasts or pictures in newspapers, the lyrics were usually mentioned in passing, with references not going far beyond citing the title of the prayer. When demonstrated on mainstream Russian TV as part of the n","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122648449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"What Alerts, Alters": Hacking the Narratives of Cultural Memory with Rankine, Eady, and Philip “警示,改变”:破解文化记忆的叙事与兰金,伊迪和菲利普
Pub Date : 2014-05-15 DOI: 10.17077/2168-569X.1428
J. Shook
Poet Harryette Mullen connects the long literary tradition of reference and recycling with more recent versions of "remix" culture in her Recyclopedia, arguing that "poetry... remakes and renews words and images, ideas, transforming surplus cultural information into something unexpected," even "salvages and finds imaginative uses for knowledge," a generative re-creation that finds not only new art but also new horizons for the human (Mullen vii). Writers have long found power within historical material, and long leaned upon their audiences' collective knowledge of the past in order to enter and amend cultural memory.1As information theory joins literary and cultural criticism, new vocabularies emerge that can expand our understandings of poetry's aesthetic and ethical potentials for meeting the past and for constructing the future. Looking at poetic projects as "hacks" in the dataset of cultural memory changes our understanding of narrative to a technology that can proliferate alternatives, rather than ossifying a dominant paradigm. If we visualize the ideas recycled through poetry as information flow, then a "hack" can serve as a productive metaphor for generative intervention. Traditionally, "hacking" refers to interference in computer networks. McKenzie Wark, however, recuperates the word from its teen basement computer geek prankster image in A Hacker Manifesto. In Wark's hands, "hack" becomes an action applicable to any creative act, metaphorized as tapping into the flow of power or diverting restricted information into avenues of greater access.2 While production merely copies, a hack differentiates (Wark paragraph 160). For Wark "to hack is to release the virtual from the actual" (Wark paragraph 74). Wark's interest lies in the value of hacking itself, but I propose a more targeted use of the idea: to hack is to break apart collective memory's seemingly fixed narratives, allowing multiple stories to emerge into actual life.Claudia Rankine, Cornelius Eady, and M. NourbeSe Philip further this expansion of social memory, and their formally demanding hacks may be usefully read with N. Katherine Hayles' formulations of database and narrative. For Hayles the technologies of narrative and database/dataset function symbiotically; applying her vocabulary allows a vision of cultural memory as a malleable dataset holding exponentially more possible narratives than normally visible.Such notions of information offer a structure for reading authors who insist that the past is never truly past, never complete, and never contained in one telling. Strategically applying the computer programming term "database," or more accurately here "dataset," allows a continuation of Eric Havelock's and Rachel Blau DuPlessis' interventions in the archives of memory and culture. After all, a dataset "is not a stable archive but a constantly shifting set of relationships" (KochnarLindgren 136). Artworks that call attention to their own construction, as Rankine's, Eady's,
诗人哈里耶特·马伦在她的《循环百科全书》中,将参考和循环的悠久文学传统与最近版本的“混合”文化联系起来,认为“诗歌……重新制作和更新文字、图像、思想,将过剩的文化信息转化为意想不到的东西,“甚至”挽救和发现知识的想象性用途,“一种生成式的再创造,不仅为人类找到了新的艺术,也为人类找到了新的视野(马伦七)。作家们长期以来一直在历史材料中找到力量,并长期依赖于他们的观众对过去的集体知识,以进入和修正文化记忆。随着信息理论与文学和文化批评的结合,新的词汇出现了,这些词汇可以扩展我们对诗歌的审美和伦理潜力的理解,以满足过去和构建未来。将诗歌项目视为文化记忆数据集中的“黑客”,改变了我们对叙事的理解,使其成为一种可以增殖替代方案的技术,而不是僵化主导范式。如果我们把通过诗歌循环的思想想象成信息流,那么“黑客”就可以作为生产性干预的一个富有成效的隐喻。传统上,“黑客”指的是对计算机网络的干扰。然而,麦肯齐·沃克(McKenzie Wark)从《黑客宣言》(A Hacker Manifesto)中十几岁的地下室电脑极客恶作剧形象中恢复了这个词。在沃克的笔下,“黑客”变成了一种适用于任何创造性行为的行为,隐喻为利用权力的流动,或将受限制的信息转移到更容易获得的途径而生产只是复制,黑客区分(Wark第160段)。对沃克来说,“黑客就是将虚拟从现实中释放出来”(沃克第74段)。沃克的兴趣在于黑客行为本身的价值,但我提出了一个更有针对性的想法:黑客行为就是打破集体记忆中看似固定的叙事,让多个故事出现在现实生活中。克劳迪娅·兰金、科尼利厄斯·伊迪和诺贝斯·菲利普进一步扩展了社会记忆,他们的正式要求可以用n·凯瑟琳·海尔斯关于数据库和叙事的构想来解读。在Hayles看来,叙事技术与数据库/数据集功能是共生的;运用她的词汇,可以将文化记忆视为一个可延展的数据集,其中包含比通常情况下更多的可能叙事。这些信息概念为那些坚持认为过去从未真正过去、从未完整、从未包含在一次叙述中的阅读作者提供了一种结构。策略性地使用计算机编程术语“数据库”,或者更准确地说是“数据集”,可以延续埃里克·哈夫洛克和雷切尔·布劳·杜普莱西斯对记忆和文化档案的干预。毕竟,数据集“不是一个稳定的档案,而是一组不断变化的关系”(KochnarLindgren 136)。像Rankine, Eady和Philip的作品一样,唤起人们对自身结构的关注的艺术作品也指向了文化本身的数据集合。黑客必须揭露“被描绘为真实的东西总是部分的、有限的,甚至可能是错误的”(Wark第74段)。因此,虽然叙事伪装成固定的——唯一可能被讲述的故事,唯一可能的部分安排——但实际上,数据集的片段可能以任何方式被组织和阅读,讲述任何数量的故事,表达任何数量的观点和角色。海尔斯对物质的关注也对抗了沃克对虚拟的痴迷,所以两者都可以在诗歌和表演的阅读中被整理出来,理论入侵与现实世界的共鸣。克劳迪娅·兰金的《别让我孤独:一首美国抒情诗》通过一种建构的主体性舞台,揭开了美国记忆中看似固定的叙事。科尼利厄斯·伊迪的戏剧《残酷的想象》将历史中隐藏的幽灵引入公众视野,直接面对兰金(反)抒情所暴露的裂缝。…
{"title":"\"What Alerts, Alters\": Hacking the Narratives of Cultural Memory with Rankine, Eady, and Philip","authors":"J. Shook","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1428","url":null,"abstract":"Poet Harryette Mullen connects the long literary tradition of reference and recycling with more recent versions of \"remix\" culture in her Recyclopedia, arguing that \"poetry... remakes and renews words and images, ideas, transforming surplus cultural information into something unexpected,\" even \"salvages and finds imaginative uses for knowledge,\" a generative re-creation that finds not only new art but also new horizons for the human (Mullen vii). Writers have long found power within historical material, and long leaned upon their audiences' collective knowledge of the past in order to enter and amend cultural memory.1As information theory joins literary and cultural criticism, new vocabularies emerge that can expand our understandings of poetry's aesthetic and ethical potentials for meeting the past and for constructing the future. Looking at poetic projects as \"hacks\" in the dataset of cultural memory changes our understanding of narrative to a technology that can proliferate alternatives, rather than ossifying a dominant paradigm. If we visualize the ideas recycled through poetry as information flow, then a \"hack\" can serve as a productive metaphor for generative intervention. Traditionally, \"hacking\" refers to interference in computer networks. McKenzie Wark, however, recuperates the word from its teen basement computer geek prankster image in A Hacker Manifesto. In Wark's hands, \"hack\" becomes an action applicable to any creative act, metaphorized as tapping into the flow of power or diverting restricted information into avenues of greater access.2 While production merely copies, a hack differentiates (Wark paragraph 160). For Wark \"to hack is to release the virtual from the actual\" (Wark paragraph 74). Wark's interest lies in the value of hacking itself, but I propose a more targeted use of the idea: to hack is to break apart collective memory's seemingly fixed narratives, allowing multiple stories to emerge into actual life.Claudia Rankine, Cornelius Eady, and M. NourbeSe Philip further this expansion of social memory, and their formally demanding hacks may be usefully read with N. Katherine Hayles' formulations of database and narrative. For Hayles the technologies of narrative and database/dataset function symbiotically; applying her vocabulary allows a vision of cultural memory as a malleable dataset holding exponentially more possible narratives than normally visible.Such notions of information offer a structure for reading authors who insist that the past is never truly past, never complete, and never contained in one telling. Strategically applying the computer programming term \"database,\" or more accurately here \"dataset,\" allows a continuation of Eric Havelock's and Rachel Blau DuPlessis' interventions in the archives of memory and culture. After all, a dataset \"is not a stable archive but a constantly shifting set of relationships\" (KochnarLindgren 136). Artworks that call attention to their own construction, as Rankine's, Eady's, ","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127643179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1