PUBLIC HISTORIAN最新文献

英文中文

Pool: A Social History of Segregation, Fairmount Water Works, Philadelphia Pool:种族隔离的社会史，Fairmount Water Works，费城

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.134

Ken Boyd

引用次数: 0

Review: Handbook of Digital Public History, edited by Serge Noiret, Mark Tebeau, and Gerben Zaagsma 评论：数字公共历史手册，由Serge Noiret、Mark Tebeau和Gerben Zaagsma编辑

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.152

J. Wojdon

引用次数: 0

Review: Practical Heritage Management: Preserving a Tangible Past, by Scott F. Anfinson 评论：《实用遗产管理：保存有形的过去》，Scott F.Anfinson著

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.150

Rob Skalecki

引用次数: 0

Review: The Nine Lives of Florida’s Famous Key Marco Cat, by Austin J. Bell 书评:《佛罗里达著名的Key Marco猫的九种生活》，奥斯汀·j·贝尔著

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.143

Traci Ardren

引用次数: 0

Editor’s Corner 编辑器的角落

3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5

Sarah H. Case

Editorial| May 01 2023 Editor’s Corner: Complicating Authority Sarah H. Case Sarah H. Case Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The Public Historian (2023) 45 (2): 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Sarah H. Case; Editor’s Corner: Complicating Authority. The Public Historian 1 May 2023; 45 (2): 5–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe Public Historian Search This issue brings several articles that explore the concept of authority in public history, an idea that has long shaped debates about how we define our field. The first, Michael J. Brown’s “Overlapping Origins, Diverging Paths: ‘Public History’ and the ‘Public Intellectual,’” examines how these two approaches to engaged scholarship (or more accurately, the labels identifying them) each emerged in response to larger social and academic trends in 1970s, but defined quite distinct approaches. Key to their differences were questions of authority. As Brown writes, “Whereas authorship and, thus, the authoritative voice have remained central for public intellectuals, public historians have rethought the nature of authority itself.…In public history, the processes of meaning-making and shared authority have moved to the center of the field.” The article provides an invaluable genealogy of our field, centering the meaning of authority squarely in its discussion. In her article, “Race, History, and the Politics... You do not currently have access to this content.

编辑| 2023年5月1日编辑角:复杂的权威Sarah H. Case Sarah H. Case搜索作者的其他作品:本网站PubMed谷歌学者公共历史学家(2023)45(2):5-6。https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5查看图标查看文章内容图表和表格视频音频补充数据同行评审分享图标分享Facebook Twitter LinkedIn电子邮件工具图标工具获得权限引用图标引用搜索网站引文莎拉h案例;编辑角:使权威复杂化。《公共历史学家》2023年5月1日;45(2): 5-6。doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5下载引文文件:Ris (Zotero)参考文献管理器EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex工具栏搜索搜索下拉菜单工具栏搜索搜索输入搜索输入自动建议过滤您的搜索所有内容公共历史学家搜索这期带来了几篇探讨公共历史中权威概念的文章，这个想法长期以来一直影响着我们如何定义我们的领域。第一篇是迈克尔·j·布朗(Michael J. Brown)的《重叠的起源，不同的路径:“公共历史”和“公共知识分子”》，研究了这两种从事学术研究的方法(或者更准确地说，是识别它们的标签)是如何在20世纪70年代响应更大的社会和学术趋势而出现的，但它们定义了截然不同的方法。他们分歧的关键是对权威的质疑。正如布朗所写，“虽然作者身份以及权威的声音仍然是公共知识分子的核心，但公共历史学家已经重新思考了权威本身的本质。”……在公共历史中，意义创造和共享权力的过程已经移到了这个领域的中心。”这篇文章为我们的领域提供了一个宝贵的谱系，在讨论中直接集中了权威的意义。在她的文章《种族、历史和政治》中……您目前没有访问此内容的权限。

{"title":"Editor’s Corner","authors":"Sarah H. Case","doi":"10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5","url":null,"abstract":"Editorial| May 01 2023 Editor’s Corner: Complicating Authority Sarah H. Case Sarah H. Case Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The Public Historian (2023) 45 (2): 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Sarah H. Case; Editor’s Corner: Complicating Authority. The Public Historian 1 May 2023; 45 (2): 5–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.2.5 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe Public Historian Search This issue brings several articles that explore the concept of authority in public history, an idea that has long shaped debates about how we define our field. The first, Michael J. Brown’s “Overlapping Origins, Diverging Paths: ‘Public History’ and the ‘Public Intellectual,’” examines how these two approaches to engaged scholarship (or more accurately, the labels identifying them) each emerged in response to larger social and academic trends in 1970s, but defined quite distinct approaches. Key to their differences were questions of authority. As Brown writes, “Whereas authorship and, thus, the authoritative voice have remained central for public intellectuals, public historians have rethought the nature of authority itself.…In public history, the processes of meaning-making and shared authority have moved to the center of the field.” The article provides an invaluable genealogy of our field, centering the meaning of authority squarely in its discussion. In her article, “Race, History, and the Politics... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":45070,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136272038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reaching into the Community to Interpret Labor History: A Museum-Labor-University Collaboration 走进社区解读劳动史：博物馆与劳动大学的合作

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.73

L. Mercier, S. Tissot, B. Richardson

引用次数: 0

Review: Public in Public History, edited by Joanna Wojdon and Dorota Wiśniewska 评论:公共历史中的公共，乔安娜·沃登和多洛塔编辑Wiśniewska

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.141

Thomas Cauvin

引用次数: 0

Review: Hidden Cities: Urban Space, Geolocated Apps and Public History in Early Modern Europe, edited by Fabrizio Nevola, David Rosenthal, and Nicholas Terpstra 评论：《隐藏的城市：现代欧洲早期的城市空间、地理定位应用程序和公共历史》，Fabrizio Nevola、David Rosenthal和Nicholas Terpstra编辑

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.143

P. Wiszewski

引用次数: 0

Review: Shaker Fever: America’s Twentieth-Century Fascination with a Communitarian Sect, by William D. Moore 评论：《震撼热：二十世纪美国对共产主义教派的迷恋》，威廉·D·摩尔著

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.146

Janneken Smucker

引用次数: 0

Editor’s Corner 编辑器的角落

3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.5

Sarah H. Case

This issue begins with Jean-Pierre Morin’s “Considering the Revolution: The Identities Created by the American Revolutionary War,” the second in a five-part series that arc from the origins to the legacies of the American Revolution (see part 1, “Considering the Revolution: Indigenous Histories and Memory in Alaska, Hawai’i, and the Indigenous Plateau” and “Decolonizing Museums, Memorials, and Monuments” in the November 2021 issue). The articles build upon on the public plenaries of the annual meeting of the National Council on Public History (NCPH), co-hosted by the National Park Service (NPS) and NCPH. These conversations will, as Morin writes, “contribute to larger discussions during NPS’s commemorations of the American Revolution’s 250th anniversary about its changing interpretation and its continuing relevance to the American people.”The 2022 panel, hosted virtually at the May NCPH meeting, reflected on the role of the Revolution in creating identity both below and above the Canadian border. Panelists (Rebecca Brannon, associate professor at James Madison University; Michael Hattem, associate director of Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute; Patrick O'Brien, lecturer of history at Kennesaw State University; Taylor Stoermer, lecturer at Johns Hopkins University; and Seynabou Thiam-Pereira, PhD candidate in American Civilization at the Université de Paris 8), considered how the war created new political and social identities, often in messy and overlapping ways. Structuring their conversation around three themes: “Who did they think they were”; “Who do we think they were”; and “Who do we think we are,” the panel considered how people in colonial America debated the meaning of loyalty and the sense of “Britishness.” They further considered how historians have, in the past and today, understood the legacy of the Revolution in sustaining both American and Canadian identity. Ultimately, Morin writes, “the Revolutionary War/War of Independence created new identities, reinforced settler-colonialism, and established not one, but two countries, the United States of America and Canada.” Beliefs born of these identities shape how the war is remembered, commemorated, and actualized in the present of both nations.The issue's other contributions likewise engage with memory and identity. In her article, “‘People First’: Interpreting and Commemorating Houselessness and Poverty,” Kristin O’Brassill-Kulfan finds that very few historic sites, markers, or museums document and interpret the history of poverty and homelessness, while those that do tend to emphasize the management of poverty rather than the poor themselves. As she writes, “on the existing landscape, we are presented with an answer to a question that hasn’t been asked: there are markers noting the provision of charitable aid, the existence of potter’s fields, and a few preserved poor farms, without an explanation of what brought them into existence, without a reference to the experience of destitution

本期从让-皮埃尔·莫兰的《考虑革命:美国独立战争创造的身份》开始，这是从美国革命的起源到遗产的五部分系列中的第二部分(见第1部分，“考虑革命:阿拉斯加、夏威夷和土著高原的土著历史和记忆”和“非殖民化博物馆、纪念馆和纪念碑”2021年11月号)。这些文章建立在由国家公园管理局(NPS)和国家公共历史委员会(NCPH)共同主办的国家公共历史委员会(NCPH)年度会议的公众全体会议的基础上。正如莫林所写，这些对话将“在NPS纪念美国独立战争250周年的活动中，对其不断变化的解释及其与美国人民的持续相关性进行更广泛的讨论。”2022年的小组讨论在5月的NCPH会议上举行，讨论了革命在创造加拿大边界上下的身份认同方面所起的作用。小组成员:詹姆斯·麦迪逊大学副教授丽贝卡·布兰农;耶鲁-纽黑文教师研究所副主任Michael Hattem;肯尼索州立大学历史讲师帕特里克·奥布莱恩;约翰霍普金斯大学讲师Taylor Stoermer;巴黎大学美国文明博士候选人塞纳布·蒂亚姆-佩雷拉(Seynabou Thiam-Pereira)研究了战争是如何以混乱和重叠的方式创造新的政治和社会身份的。围绕三个主题组织对话:“他们认为自己是谁?”“我们认为他们是谁?”和“我们认为自己是谁”，小组讨论了殖民时期的美国人如何辩论忠诚的意义和“英国性”的意义。他们进一步考虑了历史学家在过去和今天是如何理解独立战争对维持美国和加拿大身份的影响的。最后，莫林写道:“独立战争创造了新的身份，强化了移民殖民主义，建立了两个国家，而不是一个，美利坚合众国和加拿大。”这些身份所产生的信仰塑造了两国对这场战争的记忆、纪念和现实。这个问题的其他贡献同样涉及记忆和身份。Kristin O ' brassill - kulfan在她的文章《‘以人为本’:解读和纪念无家可归者与贫困》中发现，很少有历史遗迹、标志或博物馆记录和解释贫困与无家可归者的历史，而那些记录和解释贫困与无家可归者历史的博物馆往往强调贫困的管理，而不是穷人本身。正如她所写的，“在现存的景观上，我们看到了一个没有被问到的问题的答案:有一些标记表明提供了慈善援助，有陶工的田地，还有一些保存完好的贫穷农场，但没有解释它们是怎么形成的，也没有提到贫困或无家可归的经历。”考虑到美国贫困的普遍程度，这一点尤其引人注目;超过40%的美国人生活在贫困线以下或刚刚超过贫困线。O 'Brassill-Kulfan以伦敦无家可归者博物馆(见封面图)为例，呼吁公共历史学家“为经历贫困的人创造和支持空间，让他们讲述自己现在的故事，并争取在公共历史解释中纳入和承认无家可归者。”通过这种方式，公共历史学家可以“通过将公共历史遗址和学术中的贫困和生存历史化，来突出劳动和不平等的更大历史。”接下来，劳拉·波齐(Laura Pozzi)在《走向人民:参观者对上海历史博物馆殖民历史展示的反应》(Going to the People:参观者对上海历史博物馆殖民历史展示的反应)中探讨了战争和记忆如何在美国以外以意想不到的方式继续塑造国家认同。波齐考察了中外游客对博物馆中对上海近代史的民族主义、反殖民主义解读的反应。通过采访参观者，跟踪他们的活动，阅读他们在参观者留言簿上的评论，Pozzi发现参观者往往忽略了博物馆对中国共产党认可的城市历史的看法。相反，他们专注于他们认为具有美感或与个人相关的物品。波齐指出，博物馆观众绝不是被动的，他们可以“在专制政权下重新协商展览的意义”。本期的两份实地报告审查了强调外联和为本科生参与提供机会的项目。Laurie Mercier, Susan M.G.

{"title":"Editor’s Corner","authors":"Sarah H. Case","doi":"10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2023.45.1.5","url":null,"abstract":"This issue begins with Jean-Pierre Morin’s “Considering the Revolution: The Identities Created by the American Revolutionary War,” the second in a five-part series that arc from the origins to the legacies of the American Revolution (see part 1, “Considering the Revolution: Indigenous Histories and Memory in Alaska, Hawai’i, and the Indigenous Plateau” and “Decolonizing Museums, Memorials, and Monuments” in the November 2021 issue). The articles build upon on the public plenaries of the annual meeting of the National Council on Public History (NCPH), co-hosted by the National Park Service (NPS) and NCPH. These conversations will, as Morin writes, “contribute to larger discussions during NPS’s commemorations of the American Revolution’s 250th anniversary about its changing interpretation and its continuing relevance to the American people.”The 2022 panel, hosted virtually at the May NCPH meeting, reflected on the role of the Revolution in creating identity both below and above the Canadian border. Panelists (Rebecca Brannon, associate professor at James Madison University; Michael Hattem, associate director of Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute; Patrick O'Brien, lecturer of history at Kennesaw State University; Taylor Stoermer, lecturer at Johns Hopkins University; and Seynabou Thiam-Pereira, PhD candidate in American Civilization at the Université de Paris 8), considered how the war created new political and social identities, often in messy and overlapping ways. Structuring their conversation around three themes: “Who did they think they were”; “Who do we think they were”; and “Who do we think we are,” the panel considered how people in colonial America debated the meaning of loyalty and the sense of “Britishness.” They further considered how historians have, in the past and today, understood the legacy of the Revolution in sustaining both American and Canadian identity. Ultimately, Morin writes, “the Revolutionary War/War of Independence created new identities, reinforced settler-colonialism, and established not one, but two countries, the United States of America and Canada.” Beliefs born of these identities shape how the war is remembered, commemorated, and actualized in the present of both nations.The issue's other contributions likewise engage with memory and identity. In her article, “‘People First’: Interpreting and Commemorating Houselessness and Poverty,” Kristin O’Brassill-Kulfan finds that very few historic sites, markers, or museums document and interpret the history of poverty and homelessness, while those that do tend to emphasize the management of poverty rather than the poor themselves. As she writes, “on the existing landscape, we are presented with an answer to a question that hasn’t been asked: there are markers noting the provision of charitable aid, the existence of potter’s fields, and a few preserved poor farms, without an explanation of what brought them into existence, without a reference to the experience of destitution ","PeriodicalId":45070,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136172432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

PUBLIC HISTORIAN

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀