Objective: Self-directed and lifelong learning (SDLL) skills are essential skillsets in both undergraduate and graduate medical education (UME and GME). Hence, medical schools' accreditation bodies emphasize the requirements to acquire these skills in their accreditation standards. For example, in the United States, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) clearly defines the components of the SDLL process in Element 6.3 of Accreditation Standard Six. Among the active learning pedagogies, problem-based learning (PBL) provides ample learning opportunities where SDLL skills are effectively applied. The aim of this article is to streamline the process of developing, delivering, and evaluating PBL sessions in line with the SDLL accreditation requirements through a 10-step design and implementation process.
Methods: Our 10-step process, detailed in the article, starts with developing learning objectives that inform the content of the PBL case and the required embedded learning triggers. The process carefully addresses the components of the SDLL process and other aspects of the accreditation needs within the framework of PBL. The approach to implementation, feedback, assessment, and evaluation is explicitly described to meet the regulatory expectations.
Discussion: In addition to the essential role in UME and GME, SDLL skills are vital requisites for continuing medical education of all physicians. Instilling this skillset early in medical students helps to cultivate their ability to apply these skills in their future professional roles. Using accreditation standards as a foundation for creating learning experiences, for example, PBL, requires careful content development and sequencing. Such a process needs explicit standardized steps that should not only be feasible, but also transferable for usage by different medical schools.
Conclusion: Our streamlined 10-step process of designing and delivering an SDLL-oriented PBL experience can easily be adopted by other medical schools to address the SDLL skills acquisition as well as meeting the accreditation requirements.
Objectives: Smartphones have become a powerful instrument in academic life for medical professions worldwide. Global lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic culminated in the closure of educational institutions and resulted in shifting to online teaching. In our newly implemented competency-based medical education curriculum (CBME) for medical graduates, self-directed learning (SDL) is one of the teachings-learning methods. Smartphones are an essential tool for SDL in medical school. This main objective of the study is to determine the usage of health apps in a tertiary care teaching hospital to encourage the medical students and compulsory rotatory residential internship (CRRI) to continue SDL process.
Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted for the period of 30 days for medical students and CRRI's at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The population was selected using convenient sampling method. This anonymous questionnaire was validated by the experts and the questions encompassing knowledge, attitude and perception (KAP Survey) of the students toward smartphone medical apps was utilized for this survey.
Results: Out of 582 participants, only 250 students (43%) have participated in the survey. Our study shows that 95% of students were handling android smartphones, and 84% of them were using various medical applications on them and it leads to SDL.
Conclusion: The impact of the lockdown has increased SDL. Majority of the students (51.8-69.8%) have agreed that medical apps enhanced their SDL and helped them to study independently.
Objective: University College London (UCL) and Newgiza University (NGU) have been in an academic collaboration since 2016 to establish undergraduate healthcare programmes in Egypt with an underlying ethos of capacity building and co-development. We explored impacts of pandemic-related travel restrictions on staff across both organisations.
Methods: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with academic and professional services staff from UCL and NGU schools of medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy. Data were jointly coded using reflexive thematic analysis and categorised according to the American Council on Education's Comprehensive Internationalisation Framework.
Results: Nine themes were identified, which related to each of the six components of the framework. In addition to mobility, participants' experiences also spread across the other five components (institutional commitment, leadership, curriculum, faculty support, and partnerships). Successful adaptations were made and staff felt able to 'keep the show on the road'. However, staff remained keen to keep in-person engagement a priority when possible, especially for quality management site visits.
Conclusions: Travel restrictions can have widespread impacts on all aspects of international collaborations. In this well-established relationship, there was sufficient resilience to withstand these impacts and, many positive unintended consequences emerged. A hybrid engagement model should be prioritised in future partnerships.
Reflective practice, critically reflecting on one's actions or attitudes to engage in the process of continuous adaptation and learning, has proven to be an effective strategy for improved patient care. Additionally, literature supports applying reflective practice for professional growth in medical providers. When contemplating professionalism training in physician assistant (PA) education, it is important to consider how to obtain buy-in from students. One way to do this is to link professionalism to the students' future career as a PA. The School of Physician Assistant Studies at Pacific University (the Program) created an Online Orientation Reflective Practice Assignment that was implemented during online orientation. Students were prompted to use reflective practice to create detailed "plans for success." The goal of this assignment was to reduce common professionalism missteps students often experienced. Data regarding the number of professionalism encounters per cohort, broken down into occurrences by curricular phase (didactic vs clinical), was tracked and collated using Microsoft® Excel®. The data was analyzed to determine trends. Implementation of the Online Reflective Practice Assignment for all PA students at the beginning of their education has increased student awareness of the Program's, and the profession's, expectations regarding professionalism and accountability. Thus far, the resulting number of professionalism missteps have not decreased year-over-year. We hypothesize that this is due to the difficulty meeting increased administrative expectations and burdens put on students during the pandemic. Students' use of reflective practice to review what went wrong and to create plans to avoid missteps in the future allows them to focus on productive next steps in building their professional identity. Implementation of the Online Orientation Reflective Practice Assignment has better prepared students for the expectations of the PA profession and provided them with a solid foundation to build their professional identity throughout their education and into their careers.
Objectives: The residency application process has become increasingly complex for medical students and advisors to navigate. Program signaling was piloted to improve applicants' abilities to obtain interview offers at programs they were strongly interested in. The initial positive results led to expansion of signaling to additional specialties over the next two application cycles. Despite the benefits of program signaling, the variation in signaling practices among specialties has presented challenges for both advisors and students when determining how to best allocate signals. The aim of this study is to identify students' perceptions of the signaling process, how this may impact outcomes, and to guide future educational programming.
Methods: This is an exploratory original survey study of students in a US allopathic medical school applying in ERAS for the 2023 residency cycle. The survey was developed to determine students' understanding of how programs would use signals in the application process and assess strategies students used to allocate signals. We compared program signals to student interview offers and match outcomes using descriptive statistics.
Results: 57 of 96 eligible students completed the survey. 51% signaled a range of programs based on their perceived competitiveness for the program while 40% signaled programs of interest regardless of perceived competitiveness. 53% of students thought sending a signal would increase their chance of an interview, while 42% were unsure how the signal would be used by residency programs. Students received interviews at 49% of the programs signaled, which increased to 56.5% when specialties offering more than 7 signals were excluded. 35% of students matched at a signaled program.
Conclusions: Students' perceptions and strategies related to the signaling process are varied and may impact interview offers. Advisors should monitor and review internal institutional trends to help inform future educational programming to optimize signal allocation for their students.
The COVID-19 pandemic demanded significant sacrifices from medical learners. We examine the meaning of sacrifice and frame it as a "side effect" of being dedicated to the good of the patient. We contend that sacrifice has played a central role in medicine, even before the pandemic, for professionals and learners alike. We identify three limits to the role of sacrifice in medical education and practice to separate healthy from harmful experiences of sacrifice. Developing an understanding of sacrifice in medical education and practice can help trainees and clinicians know when to marshal resilient responses to healthy sacrifices and reject harmful sacrifices encountered. Maintaining this balance requires a broader reflection on the nature of medical schools and their ability to support virtuous professional identity formation.
Objective: To review the senior resident health trainee's perceived status and need for quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) education in the residency training program of Saudi Arabia.
Methods: Residents of medical, dentistry, and pharmacy education were surveyed in 2023 by using pretested 10 QIPS questions. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of the score was correlated to gender, branch, and level of residency training.
Results: We surveyed 202 senior residents. Males were 131 (64.9%). Residents of medical (126, 62.4%), dentistry (39, 19.3%), and pharmacy (37, 18.3%). The median score of responses to the QIPS survey was 7.0 (IQR 4.0, 11.6). The median score of residents of dentistry, medicine, and pharmacy were 10 (IQR 7.0, 12.5), 6.75 (IQR 4.0, 12.0), and 5.0 (IQR 2.5, 8.0) respectively, and was significantly different (Kruskal Wallis (KW) chi-square = 19.8, P = .001). The exposure to the QIPS project was significantly and positively associated with a high QIPS score (MW U P = .02). The variations in the score by gender (Mann Whitney P = .148) and the level of residency (KW P = .86) were not statistically significant. Three-fourths of participants feel the need for formal training about QIPS. Nearly half of the participants were not happy with the current method of QIPS training methodology. More than 40% of participants were not sure about questions about opportunities and mentorship of QIPS projects. One-third were involved in QIPS projects.
Conclusions: Although senior residents were interested in QIPS, they were dissatisfied with current methods and opportunities to execute supervised QIPS projects. Residents of dentistry and those having performed QIPS projects had higher QPIS knowledge and satisfaction with training.