首页 > 最新文献

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE最新文献

英文 中文
A comparison of opioid prescription trends in England and the United States from 2008 to 2020. 2008年至2020年英格兰和美国阿片类药物处方趋势的比较。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220040
Thurstan Moncrieff, Joanna Moncrieff

Background: The prescription opioid epidemic in the United States (US) is well documented, and recent measures have reduced prescribing rates in that country. Evidence suggests opioid prescriptions have been rising recently in other countries too.

Objective: The current paper aimed to compare trends in opioid prescribing in England and the US.

Methods: Trends in rates of prescriptions per 100 members of the population were calculated for England and the US using publicly available government data on prescriptions and population statistics.

Results: Rates of prescribing are converging. At the peak of the US epidemic in 2012, there were 81.3 prescriptions per 100 people, but this had fallen to 43.3 by 2020. Prescribing peaked in England in 2016 at 43.2 prescriptions per 100 people, but has fallen only slightly, so that in 2020 there were 40.9 prescriptions per 100 people.

Conclusion: The data indicate that levels of opioid prescribing in England are now similar to those in the US. They remain high in both countries, despite recent falls. This suggests the need for further measures to prevent over-prescribing and to support people who would benefit from withdrawing from these drugs.

背景:处方阿片类药物在美国的流行有充分的记录,最近的措施降低了该国的处方率。有证据表明,最近其他国家的阿片类药物处方也在增加。目的:本论文旨在比较英国和美国阿片类药物处方的趋势。方法:使用公开的政府处方数据和人口统计数据计算英国和美国每100名人口的处方率趋势。结果:处方率正在趋同。在2012年美国疫情高峰期,每100人中有81.3张处方,但到2020年已降至43.3张。2016年,英格兰的处方量达到峰值,为每100人43.2张,但仅略有下降,因此2020年每100人有40.9张处方。结论:数据表明,英国的阿片类药物处方水平现在与美国相似。尽管最近有所下降,但这两个国家的处方水平仍然很高。这表明有必要采取进一步措施,防止过度处方,并支持那些从这些药物中受益的人。
{"title":"A comparison of opioid prescription trends in England and the United States from 2008 to 2020.","authors":"Thurstan Moncrieff,&nbsp;Joanna Moncrieff","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220040","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prescription opioid epidemic in the United States (US) is well documented, and recent measures have reduced prescribing rates in that country. Evidence suggests opioid prescriptions have been rising recently in other countries too.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current paper aimed to compare trends in opioid prescribing in England and the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trends in rates of prescriptions per 100 members of the population were calculated for England and the US using publicly available government data on prescriptions and population statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates of prescribing are converging. At the peak of the US epidemic in 2012, there were 81.3 prescriptions per 100 people, but this had fallen to 43.3 by 2020. Prescribing peaked in England in 2016 at 43.2 prescriptions per 100 people, but has fallen only slightly, so that in 2020 there were 40.9 prescriptions per 100 people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data indicate that levels of opioid prescribing in England are now similar to those in the US. They remain high in both countries, despite recent falls. This suggests the need for further measures to prevent over-prescribing and to support people who would benefit from withdrawing from these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10297848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two cases of drug induced hypersensitivity to dolutegravir-rilpivirine fixed-dose combination: A case report. 两例对多卢替韦-利匹韦林固定剂量联合用药引起的药物超敏反应:一例报告。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220022
Giovanni Del Fabro, Palmiro Mileto, Francesco Castelli, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan

Background: Two-drug regimens antiretroviral therapies are increasingly prescribed to HIV patients, as they are recommended by international guidelines, and they show an excellent efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile. Regimens administered as single tablets (STRs) are usually preferred by patients and they are associated with higher adherence.

Case report: We report two cases of drug-induced hypersensitivity (DIH) that occurred after switching from dolutegravir (DTG) plus rilpivirine (RPV) in separate pills to a fixed dose combination containing the same molecules (DTG/RPV; Juluca®). Following the DIH event, DTG/RPV coformulation was discontinued. At symptomatic resolution, they continued to receive DTG plus RPV in separate pills uneventfully. The component present only in the DTG/RPV coformulation was iron oxide red (E172), contained in the film-coating. Iron oxide red is an approved colorant, used as drug excipient. Patch test with DTG/RV coformulation performed several months after the DIH event was negative. Drug allergy to excipients remains underappreciated and underreported and frequently leads to inappropriate medication discontinuation.

Conclusion: Our case underscores the role of meticulous medication allergy history in differentiating true medication allergy from excipient allergy. This observation may be useful in the era of antiretroviral simplification to two-drug regimens.

背景:正如国际指南所建议的那样,越来越多的HIV患者接受两种药物方案的抗逆转录病毒疗法,它们显示出良好的疗效、安全性和耐受性。以单片形式给药的方案通常是患者的首选,并且它们与更高的依从性有关。病例报告:我们报告了两例药物诱导性超敏反应(DIH)病例,这些病例发生在从单独的多卢替格拉韦(DTG)加利匹韦林(RPV)药丸转换为含有相同分子的固定剂量组合(DTG/RPV;Juluca®)后。DIH事件发生后,DTG/RPV联合形成终止。症状缓解后,他们继续接受DTG加RPV的单独药丸治疗,效果平平。仅在DTG/RPV共形成物中存在的组分是包含在膜涂层中的氧化铁红(E172)。氧化铁红是一种经批准的着色剂,用作药物赋形剂。在DIH事件呈阴性数月后进行DTG/RV共形成的贴片试验。对赋形剂的药物过敏仍然被低估和低估,并经常导致不适当的停药。结论:我们的病例强调了细致的药物过敏史在区分真正的药物过敏和赋形剂过敏中的作用。在抗逆转录病毒疗法简化为两种药物方案的时代,这一观察结果可能有用。
{"title":"Two cases of drug induced hypersensitivity to dolutegravir-rilpivirine fixed-dose combination: A case report.","authors":"Giovanni Del Fabro,&nbsp;Palmiro Mileto,&nbsp;Francesco Castelli,&nbsp;Eugenia Quiros-Roldan","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220022","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-drug regimens antiretroviral therapies are increasingly prescribed to HIV patients, as they are recommended by international guidelines, and they show an excellent efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile. Regimens administered as single tablets (STRs) are usually preferred by patients and they are associated with higher adherence.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We report two cases of drug-induced hypersensitivity (DIH) that occurred after switching from dolutegravir (DTG) plus rilpivirine (RPV) in separate pills to a fixed dose combination containing the same molecules (DTG/RPV; Juluca®). Following the DIH event, DTG/RPV coformulation was discontinued. At symptomatic resolution, they continued to receive DTG plus RPV in separate pills uneventfully. The component present only in the DTG/RPV coformulation was iron oxide red (E172), contained in the film-coating. Iron oxide red is an approved colorant, used as drug excipient. Patch test with DTG/RV coformulation performed several months after the DIH event was negative. Drug allergy to excipients remains underappreciated and underreported and frequently leads to inappropriate medication discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our case underscores the role of meticulous medication allergy history in differentiating true medication allergy from excipient allergy. This observation may be useful in the era of antiretroviral simplification to two-drug regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9747839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perception study of perceived value and social influence of digital health services in Indonesia. 印度尼西亚数字医疗服务的感知价值和社会影响研究。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220058
Bungaran Panggabean, Budi Suharjo, Ujang Sumarwan, Lilik Noor Yuliati

Background: Healthtech has become a nascent sector of the internet economy since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Telemedicine features are facilitated, such as teleconsultation, e-diagnosis, e-prescribing, and e-pharmacy. However, the intention to use digital health services in Indonesia is still underdeveloped though the sales of other risk-free e-commerce products are high enough.

Objective: This study aims to assess the human perception of perceived value and social influences regarding the intention to use digital health services.

Methods: Google Forms web link is employed to disseminate a set of 4-Point Likert scale questionnaires. In total, 364 complete responses are collected. A descriptive approach is employed to process the data using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software. Validity and reliability are quantified using the item total-correlation method and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient.

Results: Only 87 respondents (24%) ever used digital health services, of which Halodoc (92%) is the most preferred application, and teleconsultation became the most popular service to access. Out of four, the average score is 3.16 for perceived value and 2.86 for the social influence dimension.

Conclusion: Most respondents, not dependent on user experience, perceive more values obtained using digital health services, such as time and money savings, convenience, flexible order time, undiscovered identity, adventurous experience, and enjoyment. Another finding of this research proves that some social influences from family, friends, and mass media also bring effect to amplify the intention to use. A low level of trust is assumed to be the cause of a small number of users.

背景:自 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行以来,健康科技已成为互联网经济的一个新兴领域。远程医疗功能得到促进,如远程会诊、电子诊断、电子处方和电子药房。然而,尽管其他无风险电子商务产品的销售额足够高,但印尼使用数字医疗服务的意向仍然不足:本研究旨在评估人类对数字医疗服务使用意向的感知价值和社会影响:方法:采用谷歌表单网络链接发布一组 4 点李克特量表问卷。共收集到 364 份完整的答复。使用 Microsoft Excel 和 SPSS 软件对数据进行描述性处理。采用项目总相关法和 Cronbach's Alpha 系数对有效性和可靠性进行量化:只有 87 名受访者(24%)曾经使用过数字医疗服务,其中 Halodoc(92%)是最受欢迎的应用程序,而远程会诊则成为最受欢迎的服务。四项满分中,感知价值的平均得分为 3.16,社会影响维度的平均得分为 2.86:大多数受访者认为使用数字医疗服务能获得更多价值,如节省时间和金钱、方便、灵活的订购时间、未被发现的身份、冒险体验和享受,这与用户体验无关。本研究的另一项发现证明,来自家庭、朋友和大众媒体的一些社会影响也会放大使用意向。低信任度被认为是用户数量少的原因。
{"title":"Perception study of perceived value and social influence of digital health services in Indonesia.","authors":"Bungaran Panggabean, Budi Suharjo, Ujang Sumarwan, Lilik Noor Yuliati","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220058","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthtech has become a nascent sector of the internet economy since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Telemedicine features are facilitated, such as teleconsultation, e-diagnosis, e-prescribing, and e-pharmacy. However, the intention to use digital health services in Indonesia is still underdeveloped though the sales of other risk-free e-commerce products are high enough.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the human perception of perceived value and social influences regarding the intention to use digital health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Google Forms web link is employed to disseminate a set of 4-Point Likert scale questionnaires. In total, 364 complete responses are collected. A descriptive approach is employed to process the data using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software. Validity and reliability are quantified using the item total-correlation method and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 87 respondents (24%) ever used digital health services, of which Halodoc (92%) is the most preferred application, and teleconsultation became the most popular service to access. Out of four, the average score is 3.16 for perceived value and 2.86 for the social influence dimension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents, not dependent on user experience, perceive more values obtained using digital health services, such as time and money savings, convenience, flexible order time, undiscovered identity, adventurous experience, and enjoyment. Another finding of this research proves that some social influences from family, friends, and mass media also bring effect to amplify the intention to use. A low level of trust is assumed to be the cause of a small number of users.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9599883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The coverage of medical injuries in company trial informed consent forms. 公司试验知情同意书中医疗伤害的覆盖范围。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220043
David Healy, Augusto Germán Roux, Brianne Dressen

Best practice consent forms in company clinical trials detail the financial coverage for medical treatment of injuries. In trials undertaken for licensing purposes these arrangements can raise concerns. We detail three cases in which elements of the consent forms appear misleading and designed to elicit a consent to participation that might not be forthcoming if volunteers for these clinical trials were aware that what is outlined in principle is not likely to happen in practice. Beyond clinical trial participants, these consent forms have wider implications. Medical coverage of injuries sustained in a clinical trial is a nexus where business, scientific and ethical considerations meet. It is not clear that anyone to date has grappled with the issues posed. This paper uses three clinical trials to illustrate the problems to be addressed.

公司临床试验的最佳做法同意书详细说明了伤害医疗的财务覆盖范围。在为许可目的而进行的试验中,这些安排可能引起关注。我们详细介绍了三个案例,在这些案例中,同意书的元素似乎具有误导性,并且被设计成诱导同意参与,如果这些临床试验的志愿者意识到原则上概述的内容不太可能在实践中发生,那么这种同意可能不会出现。除了临床试验参与者之外,这些同意书还有更广泛的含义。临床试验中受伤的医疗保险是商业、科学和伦理考虑相结合的一个环节。目前尚不清楚是否有人解决了这些问题。本文通过三个临床试验来说明需要解决的问题。
{"title":"The coverage of medical injuries in company trial informed consent forms.","authors":"David Healy,&nbsp;Augusto Germán Roux,&nbsp;Brianne Dressen","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-220043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Best practice consent forms in company clinical trials detail the financial coverage for medical treatment of injuries. In trials undertaken for licensing purposes these arrangements can raise concerns. We detail three cases in which elements of the consent forms appear misleading and designed to elicit a consent to participation that might not be forthcoming if volunteers for these clinical trials were aware that what is outlined in principle is not likely to happen in practice. Beyond clinical trial participants, these consent forms have wider implications. Medical coverage of injuries sustained in a clinical trial is a nexus where business, scientific and ethical considerations meet. It is not clear that anyone to date has grappled with the issues posed. This paper uses three clinical trials to illustrate the problems to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9747873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in critically ill patients. 评估危重病人静脉注射药物的准备和用药错误。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220054
Yousif B Hamadalneel, Maha M Maatoug, Mirghani A Yousif

Background: Intravenous medications have greater complexity and require multiple steps in their preparation and administration, which is considered a high risk for patients.

Objective: To determine the incidence of intravenous medications preparation and administration errors in critically ill patients.

Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, prospective study design. The study was performed in Wad Medani Emergency Hospital, Sudan .

Results: All nurses working at the study setting were observed over nine days. During the study period, a total number of 236 drugs were observed and evaluated. The total error rate was 940 (33.4%), of which 136 (57.6%) errors with no harm, 93 (39.4%) errors with harm and 7 (3%) of errors associated with mortality. 17 different drug categories were involved, in which antibiotic was the highest error rate 104 (44.1%) and 39 different drugs were involved, in which metronidazole was the most drug involved 34 (14.4%). The total error rate was associated with nurse experience, OR (95% CI); 3.235 (1.834-5.706), and nurse education level, OR (95% CI); 0.125 (0.052-0.299).

Conclusion: The study reported high frequency of IV medications preparation and administration errors. Nurse education level, and experiences were influenced the total errors.

背景:静脉用药具有更高的复杂性,在准备和给药过程中需要多个步骤,这被认为是患者的高风险:方法:这是一项观察性、横断面、前瞻性研究:这是一项观察性、横断面、前瞻性研究。研究在苏丹 Wad Medani 急救医院进行:对在研究地点工作的所有护士进行了为期九天的观察。在研究期间,共观察和评估了 236 种药物。总错误率为 940 (33.4%),其中 136 (57.6%) 次错误没有造成伤害,93 (39.4%) 次错误造成伤害,7 (3%) 次错误导致死亡。涉及 17 种不同的药物类别,其中抗生素的错误率最高,为 104 例(44.1%);涉及 39 种不同的药物,其中甲硝唑的错误率最高,为 34 例(14.4%)。总出错率与护士经验相关,OR(95% CI)为 3.235(1.834-5.706),与护士教育水平相关,OR(95% CI)为 0.125(0.052-0.299):研究报告显示,静脉用药准备和用药错误的发生率很高。护士的教育水平和经验影响了错误总数。
{"title":"Evaluation of errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in critically ill patients.","authors":"Yousif B Hamadalneel, Maha M Maatoug, Mirghani A Yousif","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220054","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous medications have greater complexity and require multiple steps in their preparation and administration, which is considered a high risk for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of intravenous medications preparation and administration errors in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, cross-sectional, prospective study design. The study was performed in Wad Medani Emergency Hospital, Sudan .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All nurses working at the study setting were observed over nine days. During the study period, a total number of 236 drugs were observed and evaluated. The total error rate was 940 (33.4%), of which 136 (57.6%) errors with no harm, 93 (39.4%) errors with harm and 7 (3%) of errors associated with mortality. 17 different drug categories were involved, in which antibiotic was the highest error rate 104 (44.1%) and 39 different drugs were involved, in which metronidazole was the most drug involved 34 (14.4%). The total error rate was associated with nurse experience, OR (95% CI); 3.235 (1.834-5.706), and nurse education level, OR (95% CI); 0.125 (0.052-0.299).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reported high frequency of IV medications preparation and administration errors. Nurse education level, and experiences were influenced the total errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9605198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Common preventable errors in hand surgery: Analysis of NHS never events data and a proposed safety checklist. 手部手术中常见的可预防错误:NHS从不事件数据分析和拟议的安全检查表。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220030
Ahmed Hafez, Islam Omar, Andrew Ang, Mohamed Aly, Sjaak Pouwels, Frank Smeenk

Background: Hand surgical procedures are common interventions in elective and emergency settings. The complex nature of the injuries and management by multiple specialities could be a potential source of medical errors and never events (NEs). Awareness of the common NEs could potentially help prevent their occurrence in the future.

Objective: To analyse the NHS England database to identify the common NEs in hand surgery and present a simple, practical safety checklist for hand surgery.

Methods: The NHS NEs database from 2012 to 2021 has been analysed to identify the common hand surgery-related never events. We identified the common categories and themes within. Our theme development process is based on anatomical considerations and the nature of the incidents. Additionally, we designed a simple Safety Checklist for hand surgery.

Results: We identified a total of 3742 never events with 50 incidents related to hand surgery, representing (1.3%). Wrong-site surgery was the commonest category (n = 30), representing 60% of the hand surgery-related NEs. We identified seven different themes under wrong-site surgery. Wrong finger or digit surgery was the commonest theme, with 17 reported incidents representing 57% of wrong-site surgeries. This is followed by five wrong digits injections and three wrong k wire placements representing 16.6% and 10%, respectively. The second most common category was wrong incisions (n = 15), representing 30%; 13 patients had wrong finger incisions. Two patients had carpal tunnel incisions before surgeons realised that the procedures were for trigger finger release. The third category included four wrong procedures, with two incidents of carpal tunnel release instead of trigger finger operation or Dequervain tendon release. Finally, one patient had an injection for carpal tunnel intended for another patient.

Conclusion: Hand surgery-related NEs represent a small fraction (1.3%) of all NEs within the NHS database. We identified 50 hand surgery-related NEs arranged into 14 different themes. Additionally, we proposed a hand surgery-specific safety checklist to reduce the incidence of these incidents in the future.

背景:手外科手术是选择性和紧急情况下常见的干预措施。损伤的复杂性和多个专业的管理可能是医疗失误和非事件(NE)的潜在来源。对常见NE的认识可能有助于防止其在未来发生。目的:分析英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS England)的数据库,以确定手部手术中常见的NE,并提出一个简单实用的手部手术安全检查表。方法:对2012年至2021年的NHS NE数据库进行分析,以确定常见的手部手术相关never事件。我们确定了其中的共同类别和主题。我们的主题开发过程是基于解剖学考虑和事件的性质。此外,我们设计了一个简单的手部手术安全检查表。结果:我们共发现3742起从未发生过的事件,其中50起与手部手术有关,占1.3%。错误部位手术是最常见的类别(n=30),占手部手术相关NE的60%。我们在错误的手术部位确定了七个不同的主题。错误的手指或手指手术是最常见的主题,17起报告的事件占错误手术部位的57%。随后是五个错误的数字注入和三个错误的k线放置,分别占16.6%和10%。第二常见的类别是错误的切口(n=15),占30%;13例患者手指切口错误。两名患者在外科医生意识到手术是为了触发手指释放之前进行了腕管切开术。第三类包括四次错误的手术,其中两次是腕管松解而不是扳机指手术或Dequervain肌腱松解。最后,一名患者为另一名患者进行了腕管注射。结论:在NHS数据库中,与手部手术相关的NE只占所有NE的一小部分(1.3%)。我们确定了50个与手部手术相关的NE,这些NE被分为14个不同的主题。此外,我们提出了一个手部手术专用安全检查表,以减少未来这些事件的发生率。
{"title":"Common preventable errors in hand surgery: Analysis of NHS never events data and a proposed safety checklist.","authors":"Ahmed Hafez,&nbsp;Islam Omar,&nbsp;Andrew Ang,&nbsp;Mohamed Aly,&nbsp;Sjaak Pouwels,&nbsp;Frank Smeenk","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220030","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand surgical procedures are common interventions in elective and emergency settings. The complex nature of the injuries and management by multiple specialities could be a potential source of medical errors and never events (NEs). Awareness of the common NEs could potentially help prevent their occurrence in the future.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the NHS England database to identify the common NEs in hand surgery and present a simple, practical safety checklist for hand surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NHS NEs database from 2012 to 2021 has been analysed to identify the common hand surgery-related never events. We identified the common categories and themes within. Our theme development process is based on anatomical considerations and the nature of the incidents. Additionally, we designed a simple Safety Checklist for hand surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 3742 never events with 50 incidents related to hand surgery, representing (1.3%). Wrong-site surgery was the commonest category (n = 30), representing 60% of the hand surgery-related NEs. We identified seven different themes under wrong-site surgery. Wrong finger or digit surgery was the commonest theme, with 17 reported incidents representing 57% of wrong-site surgeries. This is followed by five wrong digits injections and three wrong k wire placements representing 16.6% and 10%, respectively. The second most common category was wrong incisions (n = 15), representing 30%; 13 patients had wrong finger incisions. Two patients had carpal tunnel incisions before surgeons realised that the procedures were for trigger finger release. The third category included four wrong procedures, with two incidents of carpal tunnel release instead of trigger finger operation or Dequervain tendon release. Finally, one patient had an injection for carpal tunnel intended for another patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand surgery-related NEs represent a small fraction (1.3%) of all NEs within the NHS database. We identified 50 hand surgery-related NEs arranged into 14 different themes. Additionally, we proposed a hand surgery-specific safety checklist to reduce the incidence of these incidents in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10287570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AVOIDable medical errors in invasive procedures: Facts on the ground - An NHS staff survey. 侵入性手术中可避免的医疗错误:实际情况-英国国家医疗服务体系工作人员调查。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220055
Islam Omar, Ahmed Hafez, Tilemachos Zaimis, Rishi Singhal, Rachel Spencer

Background: Never Events represent a serious problem with a high burden on healthcare providers' facilities. Despite introducing various safety checklists and precautions, many Never Events are reported yearly.

Objective: This survey aims to assess awareness and compliance with the safety standards and obtain recommendations from the National Health Service (NHS) staff on preventative measures.

Methods: An online survey of 45 questions has been conducted directed at NHS staff involved in invasive procedures. The questions were designed to assess the level of awareness, training and education delivered to the staff on patient safety. Moreover, we designed a set of focused questions to assess compliance with the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs) guidance. Open questions were added to encourage the staff to give practical recommendations on tackling and preventing these incidents. Invitations were sent through social media, and the survey was kept live from 20/11/2021 to 23/04/2022.

Results: Out of 700 invitations sent, 75 completed the survey (10.7%). 96% and 94.67% were familiar with the terms Never Events and near-miss, respectively. However, 52% and 36.49% were aware of National and Local Safety Standards for Invasive procedures (NatSSIPs-LocSSIPs), respectively. 28 (37.33%) had training on preventing medical errors. 48 (64%) believe that training on safety checklists should be delivered during undergraduate education. Fourteen (18.67%) had experiences when the checklists failed to prevent medical errors. 53 (70.67%) have seen the operating list or the consent forms containing abbreviations. Thirty-three (44%) have a failed counting reconciliation algorithm. NHS staff emphasised the importance of multi-level checks, utilisation of specific checklists, patient involvement in the safety checks, adequate staffing, avoidance of staff change in the middle of a procedure and change of list order, and investment in training and education on patient safety.

Conclusion: This survey showed a low awareness of some of the principal patient safety aspects and poor compliance with NatSSIPs recommendations. Checklists fail on some occasions to prevent medical errors. Process redesign creating a safe environment, and enhancing a safety culture could be the key. The study presented the recommendations of the staff on preventative measures.

背景:Never Events代表了一个严重的问题,给医疗保健提供者的设施带来了沉重的负担。尽管引入了各种安全检查表和预防措施,但每年都会报告许多从未发生过的事件。目的:本调查旨在评估人们对安全标准的认识和遵守情况,并从国家卫生服务体系(NHS)工作人员那里获得预防措施的建议。方法:针对参与侵入性手术的NHS工作人员,进行了一项针对45个问题的在线调查。这些问题旨在评估向工作人员提供的患者安全意识、培训和教育水平。此外,我们设计了一组重点问题来评估是否符合国家侵入性手术安全标准(NatSSIP)指南。增加了公开问题,鼓励工作人员就处理和预防这些事件提出切实可行的建议。邀请是通过社交媒体发送的,调查在2021年11月20日至2022年4月23日期间保持直播。结果:在发送的700份邀请中,75份完成了调查(10.7%)。96%和94.67%分别熟悉“从未发生过的事件”和“未遂事件”这两个术语。然而,分别有52%和36.49%的人了解国家和地方侵入性手术安全标准(NatSSIP-LocsSIP)。28人(37.33%)接受过预防医疗差错的培训。48人(64%)认为应在本科教育期间进行安全检查表培训。14人(18.67%)有检查表未能防止医疗错误的经历。53人(70.67%)看过包含缩写的手术清单或同意书。三十三人(44%)的计数对账算法失败。NHS工作人员强调了多层次检查的重要性、特定检查表的使用、患者参与安全检查、充足的人员配备、避免在手术过程中更换工作人员和更改名单顺序,以及对患者安全培训和教育的投资。结论:该调查显示,对一些主要患者安全方面的认识较低,对NatSSIPs建议的依从性较差。检查表在某些情况下会失败,以防止出现医疗错误。重新设计流程,创造一个安全的环境,加强安全文化可能是关键。研究报告介绍了工作人员关于预防措施的建议。
{"title":"AVOIDable medical errors in invasive procedures: Facts on the ground - An NHS staff survey.","authors":"Islam Omar,&nbsp;Ahmed Hafez,&nbsp;Tilemachos Zaimis,&nbsp;Rishi Singhal,&nbsp;Rachel Spencer","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220055","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Never Events represent a serious problem with a high burden on healthcare providers' facilities. Despite introducing various safety checklists and precautions, many Never Events are reported yearly.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This survey aims to assess awareness and compliance with the safety standards and obtain recommendations from the National Health Service (NHS) staff on preventative measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of 45 questions has been conducted directed at NHS staff involved in invasive procedures. The questions were designed to assess the level of awareness, training and education delivered to the staff on patient safety. Moreover, we designed a set of focused questions to assess compliance with the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs) guidance. Open questions were added to encourage the staff to give practical recommendations on tackling and preventing these incidents. Invitations were sent through social media, and the survey was kept live from 20/11/2021 to 23/04/2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 700 invitations sent, 75 completed the survey (10.7%). 96% and 94.67% were familiar with the terms Never Events and near-miss, respectively. However, 52% and 36.49% were aware of National and Local Safety Standards for Invasive procedures (NatSSIPs-LocSSIPs), respectively. 28 (37.33%) had training on preventing medical errors. 48 (64%) believe that training on safety checklists should be delivered during undergraduate education. Fourteen (18.67%) had experiences when the checklists failed to prevent medical errors. 53 (70.67%) have seen the operating list or the consent forms containing abbreviations. Thirty-three (44%) have a failed counting reconciliation algorithm. NHS staff emphasised the importance of multi-level checks, utilisation of specific checklists, patient involvement in the safety checks, adequate staffing, avoidance of staff change in the middle of a procedure and change of list order, and investment in training and education on patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey showed a low awareness of some of the principal patient safety aspects and poor compliance with NatSSIPs recommendations. Checklists fail on some occasions to prevent medical errors. Process redesign creating a safe environment, and enhancing a safety culture could be the key. The study presented the recommendations of the staff on preventative measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10287579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Graham Dukes (1930-2023): A pillar for safe and rational use of effective, affordable, essential medicines. 格雷厄姆·杜克斯(1930-2023):安全合理使用有效、负担得起的基本药物的支柱。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-235002
Wilbert Bannenberg, Liliya Eugenevna Ziganshina
{"title":"Graham Dukes (1930-2023): A pillar for safe and rational use of effective, affordable, essential medicines.","authors":"Wilbert Bannenberg,&nbsp;Liliya Eugenevna Ziganshina","doi":"10.3233/JRS-235002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-235002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10308627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Happy 80th birthday to I. Ralph Edwards from the editorial board. 编辑委员会祝我。拉尔夫。爱德华兹80岁生日快乐。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-235000
{"title":"Happy 80th birthday to I. Ralph Edwards from the editorial board.","authors":"","doi":"10.3233/JRS-235000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-235000","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9431298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases after exposure to acid-suppressive medication: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 暴露于抑酸药物后的自身免疫和免疫介导的炎症性疾病:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.7 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-220012
Anna Nevalainen, Olli Nevalainen

Background: Pharmacovigilance risk signals have proposed a relationship between the use of acid-suppressive medications and the development of certain autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Objective: A systematic review and a meta-analysis was performed.

Methods: We reviewed MEDLINE (Ovid) and Scopus for comparative observational studies between these diseases and previous exposure to proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA), and antacids. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020192715).

Results: From 3,191 citations, 25 articles were eligible and covered 16 diseases. Microscopic colitis (MC) was studied the most (7 studies). In a random-effects meta-analysis, there was low certainty evidence (GRADE approach) of a non-significant relationship between exposure to any PPIs and MC (meta-OR 3.28, 95% CI 0.98-11.0, I2 98.2%, six studies, 4,436 PPI-exposed MC patients). Moderate certainty evidence pointed towards large odds of collagenous colitis after exposure to lansoprazole (meta-OR 14.5, 95% CI 9.37-22.3, I2 10.2%, three studies, 1,725 lansoprazole-exposed patients). After PPI exposure, the risk of rheumatoid arthritis was slightly increased based on low certainty evidence from two cohort studies totaling 475 diagnoses (meta-RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.12-2.34, I2 34.5%).

Conclusions: In patients with MC, it would be reasonable to carefully review the indication of PPI, especially in CC patients using lansoprazole.

背景:药物警戒风险信号提出了抑酸药物的使用与某些自身免疫和免疫介导的炎症疾病的发展之间的关系。目的:进行系统综述和荟萃分析。方法:我们回顾了MEDLINE(Ovid)和Scopus对这些疾病与先前暴露于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)和抗酸剂之间的比较观察性研究。该方案已在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42020192715)上注册。结果:从3191次引用中,25篇文章符合条件,涵盖16种疾病。显微镜下结肠炎(MC)研究最多(7项研究)。在一项随机效应荟萃分析中,有低确定性证据(GRADE方法)表明暴露于任何PPI与MC之间存在不显著关系(meta-OR 3.28,95%CI 0.98-11.0,I2 98.2%,6项研究,4436名PPI暴露的MC患者)。中度确定性证据表明,兰索拉唑暴露后发生胶原性结肠炎的几率较大(meta-OR 14.5,95%CI 9.37-22.3,I2 10.2%,三项研究,1725名兰索拉唑接触患者)。PPI暴露后,根据两项共475例诊断的队列研究的低确定性证据,类风湿性关节炎的风险略有增加(meta RR 1.62,95%CI 1.12-2.34,I2 34.5%)。结论:在MC患者中,仔细审查PPI的指征是合理的,尤其是在使用兰索拉唑的CC患者中。
{"title":"Autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases after exposure to acid-suppressive medication: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anna Nevalainen,&nbsp;Olli Nevalainen","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220012","DOIUrl":"10.3233/JRS-220012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacovigilance risk signals have proposed a relationship between the use of acid-suppressive medications and the development of certain autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A systematic review and a meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed MEDLINE (Ovid) and Scopus for comparative observational studies between these diseases and previous exposure to proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA), and antacids. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020192715).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3,191 citations, 25 articles were eligible and covered 16 diseases. Microscopic colitis (MC) was studied the most (7 studies). In a random-effects meta-analysis, there was low certainty evidence (GRADE approach) of a non-significant relationship between exposure to any PPIs and MC (meta-OR 3.28, 95% CI 0.98-11.0, I2 98.2%, six studies, 4,436 PPI-exposed MC patients). Moderate certainty evidence pointed towards large odds of collagenous colitis after exposure to lansoprazole (meta-OR 14.5, 95% CI 9.37-22.3, I2 10.2%, three studies, 1,725 lansoprazole-exposed patients). After PPI exposure, the risk of rheumatoid arthritis was slightly increased based on low certainty evidence from two cohort studies totaling 475 diagnoses (meta-RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.12-2.34, I2 34.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with MC, it would be reasonable to carefully review the indication of PPI, especially in CC patients using lansoprazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":45237,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10642783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1