Pub Date : 2024-01-04DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2290043
Carolyn Collins
In 1949, desperate to recruit and hold on to workers, General Motors-Holden (GMH) introduced a ‘gold watch scheme’ to reward employees who gave ‘faithful’ service over twenty-five years. The scheme...
{"title":"Keeping Time: General Motors-Holden’s Gold Watch Reward Scheme, 1949–2017","authors":"Carolyn Collins","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2290043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2290043","url":null,"abstract":"In 1949, desperate to recruit and hold on to workers, General Motors-Holden (GMH) introduced a ‘gold watch scheme’ to reward employees who gave ‘faithful’ service over twenty-five years. The scheme...","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139373052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-18DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2287507
Mark Emmerson
The works of Danish-Australian historian Jens Sørensen Lyng (1868–1941) provide a problematic foundation for Australian migration studies. His 1927 magnum opus, Non-Britishers in Australia: Influen...
丹麦-澳大利亚历史学家延斯-索伦森-林(Jens Sørensen Lyng,1868-1941 年)的著作为澳大利亚移民研究提供了一个有问题的基础。他在 1927 年出版的巨著《澳大利亚的非英国人》(Non-Britishers in Australia:他在 1927 年出版的巨著《非英国人在澳大利亚:对澳大利亚的影响》(Non.
{"title":"Mis/Understanding Jens Lyng: Revisiting the Racialised Studies of an Early Twentieth-Century Historian","authors":"Mark Emmerson","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2287507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2287507","url":null,"abstract":"The works of Danish-Australian historian Jens Sørensen Lyng (1868–1941) provide a problematic foundation for Australian migration studies. His 1927 magnum opus, Non-Britishers in Australia: Influen...","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138817479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-20DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2273482
Gareth Knapman
Enlightenment colonial actors never used the term ‘terra nullius’, they used the phrase ‘uninhabited land or island’. In the 1780s, uninhabited did not mean nobody lived there, but rather signified...
{"title":"Uninhabited Islands in the Bay of Bengal, Penang, Singapore and Botany Bay: What Did Terra Nullius Mean in British Colonial Thinking?","authors":"Gareth Knapman","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2273482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2273482","url":null,"abstract":"Enlightenment colonial actors never used the term ‘terra nullius’, they used the phrase ‘uninhabited land or island’. In the 1780s, uninhabited did not mean nobody lived there, but rather signified...","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138538862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2262492
Dean J. Kotlowski
AbstractAmong US presidents, Herbert Hoover and Lyndon Johnson had the strongest ties to Australia. Hoover spent over a year in Australia as a mining engineer before launching a career in international business, food relief, and politics. In 1942, LBJ passed part of his pre-presidential career in Australia. Yet Johnson’s presidential tour in 1966, coupled with his return in 1967, generated massive enthusiasm and modest protests against the Vietnam War. President Johnson’s visits helped to solidify and celebrate US-Australian ties while encouraging Australian independence, even if during a war directed from Washington. While Hoover left his mark on Australia’s landscape in the mines he promoted and the sites that still stand, Australians found little appealing in the dour, Depression-era president who had come and gone without regarding their country as a friend or ally. Johnson thus became a consequential figure in Australia’s national history in ways Hoover never did. The author presented early versions of this article at the European Association for Studies of Australia conference in 2023 and at Bruce Hall, the Australian National University in 2022. For their comments and assistance, he thanks Frank Bongiorno, Will Christie, Damian Cole, Douglas Craig, Dean Fafoutis, Rae Frances, Katherine Jellison, Bruce Scates, Tim Rowse, and the journal’s anonymous referees. The author thanks the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board and the Australian National University for supporting this research.No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Sydney Sun, 21 October 1966, 46.2 Adelaide Advertiser, 24 October 1966, 2.3 Australian Financial Review, 24 January 1973, 1; Brisbane Courier-Mail, 24 January 1973, 4.4 David Burner, Herbert Hoover: A Public Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978), 26.5 Dean Kotlowski, ‘Farewell to the Chief: Mourning and Memorializing Herbert Hoover’, in Mourning the Presidents: Loss and Legacy in American Culture, eds Lindsay Chervinsky and Matthew Costello (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2023), 183–4.6 Yass Tribune, 18 December 1967, 2.7 Sydney Morning Herald, 22 October 1966, 2.8 Launceston Examiner, 19 October 1966, 22.9 Queanbeyan Age, 21 October 1966, 1.10 Heather Henderson, Letters to My Daughter: Robert Menzies, Letters, 1955–1975 (Sydney: Murdoch Books, 2011), 230.11 Launceston Examiner, 23 December 1967, 1; Melbourne Sun, 23 December 1967, 4.12 Adelaide Advertiser, 24 January 1973, 5.13 Robert Gordon Menzies Oral History, 24 November 1969, 15, Lyndon B. Johnson Library (hereafter LBJL), Austin, Texas.14 Dorothy Auchterlonie, ‘The Second Coming’, Meanjin Quarterly (1967), downloaded from search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.570026524535009. Western Sydney University (accessed 27 November 2022).15 David McLean, ‘Australia in the Cold War: A Historiographical Review’, International History Review 23, no. 2 (2001): 299–301.16 David Goodman, Gold Seeking: Victoria and Californi
在美国总统中,赫伯特·胡佛和林登·约翰逊与澳大利亚的关系最为密切。胡佛在澳大利亚当了一年多的采矿工程师,之后开始了在国际商业、食品救济和政治领域的职业生涯。1942年,林登·约翰逊在澳大利亚度过了他总统生涯的一部分。然而,约翰逊1966年的总统之旅,以及1967年的回国,激起了巨大的热情和反对越南战争的温和抗议。约翰逊总统的访问有助于巩固和庆祝美澳关系,同时鼓励澳大利亚独立,即使是在华盛顿指挥的战争期间。虽然胡佛在澳大利亚的景观上留下了他的印记,比如他推广的矿山和仍然存在的遗址,但澳大利亚人觉得这位阴郁的大萧条时期的总统没有什么吸引力,他来了又走,没有把他们的国家视为朋友或盟友。因此,约翰逊成为了澳大利亚国家历史上举足轻重的人物,而胡佛从未做到这一点。作者在2023年的欧洲澳大利亚研究协会会议和2022年的澳大利亚国立大学布鲁斯霍尔会议上展示了本文的早期版本。对于他们的评论和帮助,他感谢Frank Bongiorno, Will Christie, Damian Cole, Douglas Craig, Dean Fafoutis, Rae Frances, Katherine Jellison, Bruce Scates, Tim Rowse和期刊的匿名审稿人。作者感谢J. William Fulbright外国奖学金委员会和澳大利亚国立大学对本研究的支持。作者没有报告潜在的利益冲突。注1《悉尼太阳报》,1966年10月21日;46.2《阿德莱德广告人》,1966年10月24日;2.3《澳大利亚金融评论》,1973年1月24日,1;布布班信使邮报,1973年1月24日,4.4 David Burner,赫伯特·胡佛:公共生活(纽约:Alfred A. Knopf, 1978), 26.5 Dean Kotlowski,“告别酋长:悼念和纪念赫伯特·胡佛”,《悼念总统:美国文化中的损失和遗产》,Lindsay Chervinsky和Matthew Costello编(夏洛特维尔:《亚斯论坛报》,1967年12月18日,《悉尼先驱晨报》,1966年10月22日,2.8《朗塞斯顿考官》,1966年10月19日,22.9《Queanbeyan Age》,1966年10月21日,1.10希瑟·亨德森,《给我女儿的信:罗伯特·孟席斯》,1955-1975年,《信件》(悉尼:默多克出版社,2011年),230.11《朗塞斯顿考官》,1967年12月23日,第1期;1967年12月23日,《墨尔本太阳报》;1973年1月24日,《阿德莱德广告人》;1969年11月24日,《罗伯特·戈登·门齐斯口述历史》;15,德克萨斯州奥斯汀林登·b·约翰逊图书馆(以下简称LBJL); 14多萝西·奥克特洛尼,《耶稣再临》,Meanjin季刊(1967),从search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.570026524535009下载。西悉尼大学(就读于2022年11月27日)大卫·麦克莱恩,《冷战中的澳大利亚:史学评论》,《国际历史评论》第23期,第2期。大卫·古德曼:《淘金:19世纪50年代的维多利亚和加利福尼亚》(斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,1994年);罗宾·阿彻:《为什么美国没有工党?》(普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,2008);玛丽莲·莱克,进步的新世界:定居者殖民主义和跨太平洋交流如何塑造美国改革(剑桥,马萨诸塞州:哈佛大学出版社,2019);《非法之爱:美国和澳大利亚的跨种族性与婚姻》(林肯:内布拉斯加大学出版社,2015),第17页唯一的研究是Dean J. Kotlowski,“总统俱乐部重访:赫伯特·胡佛、林登·约翰逊、政治遗产和两党合作”,《历史学家》82,第2期。4(2020): 463-91.18保罗·斯特兰奇奥,“不稳定,1966-82”,在澳大利亚的剑桥历史,卷二,澳大利亚联邦,编辑艾莉森·巴什福德和斯图尔特·麦金泰尔(悉尼:剑桥大学出版社,2013),135-41.19彼得·爱德华兹,“澳大利亚和越南战争:50年”,2020年2月29日,战略家,https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/australia-and-the-vietnam-war-50-years-on/(访问2023年6月30日)。另见彼得·爱德华兹:《澳大利亚与越南战争》(悉尼:NewSouth Books, 2014);格雷戈里·彭伯顿,《一路:澳大利亚通往越南之路》(悉尼:Allen and Unwin出版社,1987),第20页Paul Ham,“名义上的盟友”,Griffith Review 48(2015年4月),https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/allies-name-alone/(2023年7月7日访问)。参见Paul Ham,越南——澳大利亚战争(悉尼:HarperCollins, 2007)马尔科姆·弗雷泽与凯恩·罗伯茨合著,《危险的盟友》(墨尔本:墨尔本大学出版社,2016年),111 - 50,283.22艾玛·肖蒂斯,《我们非凡的朋友:澳大利亚与美国的致命联盟》(悉尼:哈迪·格兰特出版社,2021年),232.23《墨尔本太阳报》,1973年1月24日,8.24肯尼斯·怀特,《胡佛:非凡时代的非凡人生》(纽约:克诺夫出版社,2017年),54-61;格伦·简松(与大卫·鲁尔森合著),《胡佛:一生》(纽约:新美国图书馆,2016),53-65.25页。 Kalgoorlie Miner, 1966年10月13日,2;霍巴特水星,1966年10月7日,4;《墨尔本先驱报》1966年10月7日第4期;布里斯班信使,1966年10月10日,2.74朗塞斯顿审查员,1966年10月7日,4.75奥尔伯里边境晨报,1966年10月15日,46.76同上,3;《悉尼先驱晨报》1966年10月14日,1.77《悉尼太阳报》1966年10月18日,第4期;《沃加·沃加日报》,1966年10月20日;《西澳大利亚》,1966年10月7日,第1期;卡尔古利矿工,1966年10月13日,2.79库马-莫纳罗快递,1966年10月12日,2.80悉尼每日电讯报,1966年10月19日,2.81澳大利亚人,1966年10月14日,8.82霍巴特信使,1966年10月17日,4.83朗赛斯顿观察家,1966年10月19日,1.84汤斯维尔每日公报,1966年10月10日,2.85霍巴特信使,1966年10月21日,5.86布里斯班信使,1966年10月19日,2.87同上,1966年10月10日,3;《时代》,1966年10月13日,1;《悉尼每日电讯报》1966年10月20日第53期;《阿德莱德广告人》1966年10月8日第2期;墨尔本先驱报,1966年10月18日,1;《悉尼先驱晨报》,1966年10月20日,1.88《沃加·沃加每日广告人》,1966年10月20日,2.89《伯德·约翰逊夫人的录音日记和注释记录》,1966年10月20日,《伯德·约翰逊夫人的白宫日记集》,LBJL.90《澳大利亚人报》,196
{"title":"Australia’s Presidents? Herbert Hoover and Lyndon B. Johnson Remembered","authors":"Dean J. Kotlowski","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2262492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2262492","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAmong US presidents, Herbert Hoover and Lyndon Johnson had the strongest ties to Australia. Hoover spent over a year in Australia as a mining engineer before launching a career in international business, food relief, and politics. In 1942, LBJ passed part of his pre-presidential career in Australia. Yet Johnson’s presidential tour in 1966, coupled with his return in 1967, generated massive enthusiasm and modest protests against the Vietnam War. President Johnson’s visits helped to solidify and celebrate US-Australian ties while encouraging Australian independence, even if during a war directed from Washington. While Hoover left his mark on Australia’s landscape in the mines he promoted and the sites that still stand, Australians found little appealing in the dour, Depression-era president who had come and gone without regarding their country as a friend or ally. Johnson thus became a consequential figure in Australia’s national history in ways Hoover never did. The author presented early versions of this article at the European Association for Studies of Australia conference in 2023 and at Bruce Hall, the Australian National University in 2022. For their comments and assistance, he thanks Frank Bongiorno, Will Christie, Damian Cole, Douglas Craig, Dean Fafoutis, Rae Frances, Katherine Jellison, Bruce Scates, Tim Rowse, and the journal’s anonymous referees. The author thanks the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board and the Australian National University for supporting this research.No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Sydney Sun, 21 October 1966, 46.2 Adelaide Advertiser, 24 October 1966, 2.3 Australian Financial Review, 24 January 1973, 1; Brisbane Courier-Mail, 24 January 1973, 4.4 David Burner, Herbert Hoover: A Public Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978), 26.5 Dean Kotlowski, ‘Farewell to the Chief: Mourning and Memorializing Herbert Hoover’, in Mourning the Presidents: Loss and Legacy in American Culture, eds Lindsay Chervinsky and Matthew Costello (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2023), 183–4.6 Yass Tribune, 18 December 1967, 2.7 Sydney Morning Herald, 22 October 1966, 2.8 Launceston Examiner, 19 October 1966, 22.9 Queanbeyan Age, 21 October 1966, 1.10 Heather Henderson, Letters to My Daughter: Robert Menzies, Letters, 1955–1975 (Sydney: Murdoch Books, 2011), 230.11 Launceston Examiner, 23 December 1967, 1; Melbourne Sun, 23 December 1967, 4.12 Adelaide Advertiser, 24 January 1973, 5.13 Robert Gordon Menzies Oral History, 24 November 1969, 15, Lyndon B. Johnson Library (hereafter LBJL), Austin, Texas.14 Dorothy Auchterlonie, ‘The Second Coming’, Meanjin Quarterly (1967), downloaded from search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.570026524535009. Western Sydney University (accessed 27 November 2022).15 David McLean, ‘Australia in the Cold War: A Historiographical Review’, International History Review 23, no. 2 (2001): 299–301.16 David Goodman, Gold Seeking: Victoria and Californi","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"27 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135325543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2267586
Mike Jones, Alana Piper
Digital history started to flourish in Australia and New Zealand in the 2000s and early 2010s. But some of this momentum has since been lost due to ageing technologies, a lack of supporting infrastructure, funding issues, discontinued projects, and limited teaching and training opportunities. This ‘state of the field’ article on digital history seeks to encourage greater reflexivity in the discipline by providing a detailed overview of the local context. It highlights some of the longstanding projects that continue to dominate the digital history landscape, while also exploring newly emerging innovations, opportunities and challenges. Examining such topics as infrastructure and tool development, digital archives and repositories, big history, public history, digital methods, and teaching, the authors conclude that additional investment is required to support progress in the field, and to ensure that past projects and data remain accessible into the future.
{"title":"Digital History","authors":"Mike Jones, Alana Piper","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2267586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2267586","url":null,"abstract":"Digital history started to flourish in Australia and New Zealand in the 2000s and early 2010s. But some of this momentum has since been lost due to ageing technologies, a lack of supporting infrastructure, funding issues, discontinued projects, and limited teaching and training opportunities. This ‘state of the field’ article on digital history seeks to encourage greater reflexivity in the discipline by providing a detailed overview of the local context. It highlights some of the longstanding projects that continue to dominate the digital history landscape, while also exploring newly emerging innovations, opportunities and challenges. Examining such topics as infrastructure and tool development, digital archives and repositories, big history, public history, digital methods, and teaching, the authors conclude that additional investment is required to support progress in the field, and to ensure that past projects and data remain accessible into the future.","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135272533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-30DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2256740
Jon Piccini
{"title":"‘Time Is Against Us’: Anti-Communism, Decolonisation, and Papua New Guinean Independence","authors":"Jon Piccini","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2256740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2256740","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136102490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-20DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2256038
Bridget Andresen
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
点击放大图片点击缩小图片作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。
{"title":"<i>Criminal Law</i> – <i>Then, Now, Tomorrow</i> , Queen Elizabeth II Courts of Law, Brisbane, 2 January 2023 to 31 December 2024","authors":"Bridget Andresen","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2256038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2256038","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135569955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2247006
Janet Butler
AbstractVisual sources, capturing aspects of life silenced or left untold in textual accounts, have the potential to offer new, historical understandings of the individual experience of war. During World War I, official war artist James McBey created a series of images of Australian soldiers – Cameliers – on reconnaissance in the Sinai Desert. This article reads a selection of those images, arguing that what they signified and the emotions they aroused can be retrieved historically by considering their multiple contexts. These include not only the social, political, and military environments, but also the cultural imaginaries which the artist shared with his audiences. AcknowledgementThe author thanks the anonymous reviewers and the AHS editors, and the members of Melbourne Lifewriters, as well as Bill Breen, Liz Dimock, Lucy Ellem, Richard Haese and especially Lee-Ann Monk, for their expert comments, and Annalisa Giudici for her sound guidance. Gratitude is also due to Griffin Coe and Ann Steed of Aberdeen Art Gallery, Sandra Still of Aberdeen City Council, and Barbara Kehler for the Estate of James McBey, for their great kindness and assistance with permissions, and with archival and curatorial assistance, along with Andrew Webb, Sophie Fisher and Jenny Wood (Imperial War Museum), Jade Murray (Australian War Memorial), Elizabeth Bray (British Museum) and Neil Hodge (University of California, Los Angeles Library Special Collections). Katie Eglinton kindly allowed access to family papers. The reproduction of McBey’s Long Patrol series was made possible by the generosity of Aberdeen City Council, and additionally, in the case of Tracks Discovered, the Imperial War Museum and Martin Kennedy, Creative Director of the Studio International Foundation.Notes1 H.S. Gullett, The Australian Imperial Force in Sinai and Palestine 1914–1918 (Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1937), 69.2 Pre-censorship caption to No. 57, A Long Patrol in the Desert of Sinai, list attached to letter, Major Foster to Ivor Nicholson, 4 November 1917, First World War Artist’s Archive (hereafter FWWAA) 83-3 James McBey 1917–28 Part 1, Imperial War Museum (hereafter IWM), London; James McBey Sketchbook-War, ABDAG003075.43, Aberdeen Art Gallery.3 The Bir el Murr-Moiya Harab Road. James McBey, Diary, 12 July 1917, ABDAG9037; War Office Geographical Section, General Staff, No.2427/Lieut.Pratt RGA/Egyptian Survey Department, Egypt: Great Bitter Lake: Africa 1:125,000 (sheet North H-36/I-III) [Cartographic material], Great Britain, War Office, 1912.4 The Cameliers carried supplies for five days, and the Long Patrol is usually framed as this length.5 John Horne, ‘End of a Paradigm? Cultural History and the Great War’, Past & Present 242, no. 1 (February 2019): 185.6 See Santanu Das, India, Empire, and First World War Culture: Writings, Images, and Songs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).7 Photographer Frank Hurley arrived in August 1917. Henry Gullett, the Official (Australian) War C
{"title":"Art as a Source for the History of War: James McBey’s <i>Long Patrol</i> Images and Emotional Responses to the Sinai Campaign","authors":"Janet Butler","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2247006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2247006","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractVisual sources, capturing aspects of life silenced or left untold in textual accounts, have the potential to offer new, historical understandings of the individual experience of war. During World War I, official war artist James McBey created a series of images of Australian soldiers – Cameliers – on reconnaissance in the Sinai Desert. This article reads a selection of those images, arguing that what they signified and the emotions they aroused can be retrieved historically by considering their multiple contexts. These include not only the social, political, and military environments, but also the cultural imaginaries which the artist shared with his audiences. AcknowledgementThe author thanks the anonymous reviewers and the AHS editors, and the members of Melbourne Lifewriters, as well as Bill Breen, Liz Dimock, Lucy Ellem, Richard Haese and especially Lee-Ann Monk, for their expert comments, and Annalisa Giudici for her sound guidance. Gratitude is also due to Griffin Coe and Ann Steed of Aberdeen Art Gallery, Sandra Still of Aberdeen City Council, and Barbara Kehler for the Estate of James McBey, for their great kindness and assistance with permissions, and with archival and curatorial assistance, along with Andrew Webb, Sophie Fisher and Jenny Wood (Imperial War Museum), Jade Murray (Australian War Memorial), Elizabeth Bray (British Museum) and Neil Hodge (University of California, Los Angeles Library Special Collections). Katie Eglinton kindly allowed access to family papers. The reproduction of McBey’s Long Patrol series was made possible by the generosity of Aberdeen City Council, and additionally, in the case of Tracks Discovered, the Imperial War Museum and Martin Kennedy, Creative Director of the Studio International Foundation.Notes1 H.S. Gullett, The Australian Imperial Force in Sinai and Palestine 1914–1918 (Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1937), 69.2 Pre-censorship caption to No. 57, A Long Patrol in the Desert of Sinai, list attached to letter, Major Foster to Ivor Nicholson, 4 November 1917, First World War Artist’s Archive (hereafter FWWAA) 83-3 James McBey 1917–28 Part 1, Imperial War Museum (hereafter IWM), London; James McBey Sketchbook-War, ABDAG003075.43, Aberdeen Art Gallery.3 The Bir el Murr-Moiya Harab Road. James McBey, Diary, 12 July 1917, ABDAG9037; War Office Geographical Section, General Staff, No.2427/Lieut.Pratt RGA/Egyptian Survey Department, Egypt: Great Bitter Lake: Africa 1:125,000 (sheet North H-36/I-III) [Cartographic material], Great Britain, War Office, 1912.4 The Cameliers carried supplies for five days, and the Long Patrol is usually framed as this length.5 John Horne, ‘End of a Paradigm? Cultural History and the Great War’, Past & Present 242, no. 1 (February 2019): 185.6 See Santanu Das, India, Empire, and First World War Culture: Writings, Images, and Songs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).7 Photographer Frank Hurley arrived in August 1917. Henry Gullett, the Official (Australian) War C","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135350654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2255196
Daniel Simpson
AbstractAmid growing public and academic interest in the identification and return of Aboriginal objects acquired by Britain from Australia after 1788, enquiries into the disputed origins of the British Museum’s ‘Gweagal shield’ have highlighted the need for new and better forms of provenance research. This article explores a novel methodology and source of information: British Treasury and customs records detailing the descriptions, values, and duties paid upon a vast number of colonial collections of Aboriginal objects, human remains, and natural history specimens known to have disembarked in Britain between 1788 and 1823. By positing a new provenance for the ‘Gweagal shield’ – namely, that it may have accompanied Bennelong, Yemmerrawanne and Arthur Phillip on their passage to England in 1793 – the article explores the potential of such records for highlighting what, when, how, and from whom Australian collections arrived in Britain in this early and hitherto little-understood period. AcknowledgementI thank Dr Maria Nugent for her comments on early drafts; likewise, Professor Gaye Sculthorpe and Dr Paul Irish. I am also grateful to the staff of The National Archives, London for their assistance in procuring a large number of records.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Object Oc1978, Q.839, The British Museum.2 Nicholas Thomas, ‘A Case of Identity: The Artefacts of the 1770 Kamay (Botany Bay) Encounter’, Australian Historical Studies 49, no. 1 (February 2018): 4–27; Maria Nugent and Gaye Sculthorpe, ‘A Shield Loaded with History: Encounters, Objects and Exhibitions’, Australian Historical Studies 49, no. 1 (February 2018): 41.3 J.V.S. Megaw, ‘“There’s a Hole in my Shield … ”: A Textual Footnote’, Australian Archaeology 38, no. 1 (June 1994): 35–37.4 For a fuller account of past and present understandings of the role of taxation in the history of collecting, see Daniel Simpson, The Royal Navy in Indigenous Australia, 1795–1855: Maritime Encounters and British Museum Collections (Cham: Springer, 2021), 189–217.5 Ibid., 253.6 On the post-1823 decline in reliability and utility of customs records, see below and Simpson, The Royal Navy, 211–14.7 Richard Neville, A Rage for Curiosity: Visualising Australia 1788–1830 (Sydney: State Library of New South Wales, 1997).8 Neil Macgregor, A History of the World in 100 Objects (London: Penguin Books Ltd, 2010).9 Thomas, ‘A Case of Identity’.10 Nicholas Thomas, ‘Museum Collections in Transit: Towards a History of the Artefacts of the Endeavour Voyage’, in Material Culture in Transit: Theory and Practice, ed. Zainabu Jallo (Abingdon: Routledge, 2023).11 Ibid.12 Ibid.13 See, for example, Zoe Rimmer and Rebe Taylor, ‘An Analysis of the 2021 Apologies by the Royal Society of Tasmania and the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery to the Tasmanian Aboriginal Community’, Australian Historical Studies 54, no. 1 (February 2023): 77–90.14 Chris Gosden and Frances Larson, Kn
随着公众和学术界对鉴定和归还1788年后英国从澳大利亚获得的土著物品的兴趣日益浓厚,对大英博物馆“格威格尔盾牌”有争议的来源的调查凸显了对新的、更好的来源研究形式的需要。本文探索了一种新颖的方法和信息来源:英国财政部和海关记录,详细描述了1788年至1823年间登陆英国的大量殖民地收藏的土著物品、人类遗骸和自然历史标本的描述、价值和所支付的关税。通过假设“Gweagal盾牌”的新来源——也就是说,它可能伴随着Bennelong, Yemmerrawanne和Arthur Phillip在1793年前往英国——文章探索了这些记录的潜力,以突出在这个早期和迄今为止知之甚少的时期,澳大利亚收藏品是什么,什么时候,如何以及从谁那里到达英国的。感谢Maria Nugent博士对早期草稿的评论;同样,盖伊·斯卡索普教授和保罗·爱尔兰博士。我也要感谢伦敦国家档案馆的工作人员,他们帮助我获得了大量的记录。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。2 Nicholas Thomas,“身份的案例:1770年Kamay (Botany Bay)遭遇的人工制品”,《澳大利亚历史研究》49期,第839号。1(2018年2月):4-27;Maria Nugent和Gaye Sculthorpe,“装载着历史的盾牌:相遇、物品和展览”,《澳大利亚历史研究》第49期。1(2018年2月):41.3 J.V.S. Megaw,“在我的盾牌上有一个洞……”:一个文本脚注”,《澳大利亚考古》第38期,第4期。1(1994年6月):35-37.4关于税收在征收史上的作用的过去和现在的理解的更全面的说明,见丹尼尔·辛普森,澳大利亚土著的皇家海军,1795年至1855年:海上遭遇和大英博物馆收藏(Cham: Springer, 2021), 189-217.5同上,253.6关于1823年后海关记录可靠性和效用的下降,见下文和辛普森,皇家海军,211-14.7理查德·内威尔,好奇的怒火:7 .《可视化澳大利亚1788-1830》(悉尼:新南威尔士州立图书馆,1997年)9 .尼尔·麦格雷戈,《100件物品中的世界史》(伦敦:企鹅图书有限公司,2010)托马斯,《身份的案例》尼古拉斯·托马斯,《运输中的博物馆藏品:奋进号航行中文物的历史》,载于《运输中的物质文化:理论与实践》,Zainabu Jallo主编(阿宾登:劳特利奇出版社,2023年)例如,参见Zoe Rimmer和Rebe Taylor,“塔斯马尼亚皇家学会和塔斯马尼亚博物馆和美术馆对塔斯马尼亚土著社区的2021年道歉分析”,《澳大利亚历史研究》第54期。1(2023年2月):77-90.14克里斯·戈斯登和弗朗西斯·拉尔森,知道的事情:探索收藏在皮特河博物馆,1884年至1945年(牛津:牛津大学出版社,2007年)伊泽贝尔·麦克唐纳,“计算时间、人物和方式:通过藏品数据可视化大英博物馆的收购历史,1753-2019”,《收藏史杂志》第35期。2(2022年7月):4-5.16 CUST和T,国家档案馆[TNA].17《博物馆、无限和协议文化》(伦敦:劳特利奇出版社,2019),第26.18页。约翰·麦卡利尔,“收藏的烦恼”:威廉·亨利·哈维和英国19世纪世界自然历史收藏的实用性”,《英国科学史杂志》,第55期。1(2022年3月):91.19 Matthew Fishburn,“John Septimus Roe的私人博物馆,解散于1842年”,《自然历史档案》47,no. 19。1(2020年4月):166-82.20 John Septimus Roe致William Roe, 1821年6月6日,John Septimus Roe信件[以下简称JSRL], 05系列,新南威尔士州立图书馆[以下简称SLNSW].21参见辛普森,皇家海军,189-217.22威廉·欧文,“分别对东印度和中国主要产品征收关税的金额的说明;1812年1月5日止三年的年平均数”,载于论文等。(东印度公司),第四部分。,第十卷(伦敦:下议院,一八一二年至一八一三年)威廉·欧文,《已收关税的商品的归还》,根据《财政帐目》,第66卷。81822年,见《下议院文件》第12卷(伦敦:下议院,1823年)26 . 1823年,“新荷兰和南海群岛”被视为该记录集中的一个单一实体参见辛普森,皇家海军,191.27约翰·塞普提姆斯·罗伊致威廉·罗伊,1821年2月26日,JSRL,系列04,SLNSW.28约翰·塞普提姆斯·罗伊致威廉·罗伊,1821年6月6日,JSRL,系列05,SLNSW.29 CUST 37/51-2, TNA。 30财政委员会,“亚伯拉罕·贝尔关于以不合理的低价出售海关扣押的货物的附件备忘录报告”,1767年8月7日,T 1/459: 136-139, TNA.31伦敦海关,“根据陛下海关长官阁下的命令出售”,1809年12月9日,CUST 37/52: 18, TNA.32同上,19.33伦敦海关,“根据陛下海关长官阁下的命令出售”,1810年4月19日,CUST 37/51:35见辛普森,皇家海军,257.36 T和CUST, TNA.37丹尼尔·辛普森,“远征收藏:哈斯拉医院博物馆和公共知识的流通,1815-1855”,在移动博物馆,菲利克斯·德莱弗,马克·内斯bitt和卡罗琳·康沃尔(伦敦:伦敦大学学院出版社,2021),149-77.38 T 1, TNA.39 T 2, TNA.40 T 29, TNA.41 T 11, TNA.42 CUST 28, TNA.43参见,例如,约瑟夫·班克斯给国王陛下的财政大臣,1810年12月10日,T 1/1164, TNA.44 T 11/37, TNA.45威廉·尼特·查普曼给克里斯蒂娜·尼特·查普曼,1791年10月18日,威廉·尼特·查普曼信件,1974年,SLNSW.46参见伊丽莎白·埃利斯,稀有和好奇:州长麦考瑞藏宝箱的秘密历史(悉尼:新南威尔士州图书馆,2010年)布鲁斯·巴肯和安妮玛丽·麦克拉伦,《爱丁堡的海外启蒙:以医生、商人、自然历史学家和移民殖民者的身份为人类导航》,《思想史评论》第31期。4(2020年5月):627-49.48大卫·柯林斯,英国殖民地在新南威尔士州的帐户,卷2。(伦敦:T. Cadell和W. Davies, 1802), 320.49贾米森被认为是肯特公爵号货船上的一名乘客,当时这艘船正从里约热内卢出发。见Sibella Macarthur Onslow主编,Camden Macarthur的一些早期记录(悉尼:Angus & Robertson, 1914), 178;威廉·布洛克,《布洛克先生博物馆的同伴》(伦敦:亨利·雷奈尔出版社,1811年),7.50《物品VI 151》,民族学博物馆,柏林。51弓箭在整个托雷斯海峡使用。52 T 11/39, TNA.53 Collins,卷1。(1804)。本研究得到了澳大利亚研究理事会(资助号DP200102212)“动员土著物品:国际博物馆中的土著历史”项目的支持,该项目由Maria Nugent博士领导。
{"title":"Navigating the Customs House, Then and Now: A Synthesis of British Colonial Collecting in Australia, 1788–1823","authors":"Daniel Simpson","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2255196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2255196","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAmid growing public and academic interest in the identification and return of Aboriginal objects acquired by Britain from Australia after 1788, enquiries into the disputed origins of the British Museum’s ‘Gweagal shield’ have highlighted the need for new and better forms of provenance research. This article explores a novel methodology and source of information: British Treasury and customs records detailing the descriptions, values, and duties paid upon a vast number of colonial collections of Aboriginal objects, human remains, and natural history specimens known to have disembarked in Britain between 1788 and 1823. By positing a new provenance for the ‘Gweagal shield’ – namely, that it may have accompanied Bennelong, Yemmerrawanne and Arthur Phillip on their passage to England in 1793 – the article explores the potential of such records for highlighting what, when, how, and from whom Australian collections arrived in Britain in this early and hitherto little-understood period. AcknowledgementI thank Dr Maria Nugent for her comments on early drafts; likewise, Professor Gaye Sculthorpe and Dr Paul Irish. I am also grateful to the staff of The National Archives, London for their assistance in procuring a large number of records.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Object Oc1978, Q.839, The British Museum.2 Nicholas Thomas, ‘A Case of Identity: The Artefacts of the 1770 Kamay (Botany Bay) Encounter’, Australian Historical Studies 49, no. 1 (February 2018): 4–27; Maria Nugent and Gaye Sculthorpe, ‘A Shield Loaded with History: Encounters, Objects and Exhibitions’, Australian Historical Studies 49, no. 1 (February 2018): 41.3 J.V.S. Megaw, ‘“There’s a Hole in my Shield … ”: A Textual Footnote’, Australian Archaeology 38, no. 1 (June 1994): 35–37.4 For a fuller account of past and present understandings of the role of taxation in the history of collecting, see Daniel Simpson, The Royal Navy in Indigenous Australia, 1795–1855: Maritime Encounters and British Museum Collections (Cham: Springer, 2021), 189–217.5 Ibid., 253.6 On the post-1823 decline in reliability and utility of customs records, see below and Simpson, The Royal Navy, 211–14.7 Richard Neville, A Rage for Curiosity: Visualising Australia 1788–1830 (Sydney: State Library of New South Wales, 1997).8 Neil Macgregor, A History of the World in 100 Objects (London: Penguin Books Ltd, 2010).9 Thomas, ‘A Case of Identity’.10 Nicholas Thomas, ‘Museum Collections in Transit: Towards a History of the Artefacts of the Endeavour Voyage’, in Material Culture in Transit: Theory and Practice, ed. Zainabu Jallo (Abingdon: Routledge, 2023).11 Ibid.12 Ibid.13 See, for example, Zoe Rimmer and Rebe Taylor, ‘An Analysis of the 2021 Apologies by the Royal Society of Tasmania and the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery to the Tasmanian Aboriginal Community’, Australian Historical Studies 54, no. 1 (February 2023): 77–90.14 Chris Gosden and Frances Larson, Kn","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135351493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-02DOI: 10.1080/1031461x.2023.2261589
Jayne Persian
"Cruel Care: A History of Children at Our Borders." Australian Historical Studies, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), pp. 1–2
《残酷的关怀:我们边境儿童的历史》澳大利亚历史研究,印前(印前),1-2页
{"title":"Cruel Care: A History of Children at Our Borders <b> <i>Cruel Care: A History of Children at Our Borders</i> </b> By Jordana Silverstein. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 2023. Pp. 320. A$34.99paper.","authors":"Jayne Persian","doi":"10.1080/1031461x.2023.2261589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2023.2261589","url":null,"abstract":"\"Cruel Care: A History of Children at Our Borders.\" Australian Historical Studies, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), pp. 1–2","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135901757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}