Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/10482911221150832
Sharon Beard, Kenda Freeman, David Richards, Joy Lee Pearson
For over 25 years, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Environmental Career Worker Training Program (ECWTP) has advanced principles of environmental justice by funding nonprofit organizations, or grantees, to deliver health, safety, and job training for individuals from disadvantaged communities. This article provides a brief background of the environmental justice movement and examines the efforts of grantees to demonstrate how the ECWTP model can serve as a pathway for advancing environmental justice in disadvantaged and underserved communities.
{"title":"Government Program Celebrates 25 Years of Commitment to Environmental Justice Movement.","authors":"Sharon Beard, Kenda Freeman, David Richards, Joy Lee Pearson","doi":"10.1177/10482911221150832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221150832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For over 25 years, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Environmental Career Worker Training Program (ECWTP) has advanced principles of environmental justice by funding nonprofit organizations, or grantees, to deliver health, safety, and job training for individuals from disadvantaged communities. This article provides a brief background of the environmental justice movement and examines the efforts of grantees to demonstrate how the ECWTP model can serve as a pathway for advancing environmental justice in disadvantaged and underserved communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 4","pages":"277-287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191422/pdf/nihms-1882553.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9536949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/10482911231153676
Isabel Cuervo, Ashlee Fitch, Diane Stein, Sherry L Baron
Few studies have explored mentorship's value in occupational safety and health (OSH) training that focuses on worker empowerment in blue-collar occupations. Through a university and union collaboration, we examined mentorship programs as a promising enhancement to ongoing OSH training to foster worker leadership development in organizations focused on worker empowerment. Union-based worker-trainers from 11 large manufacturing facilities across the United States and worker-trainers affiliated with 11 Latinx Worker Centers in the New York City area were interviewed. Rapid Evaluation and Assessment Methods informed study design. The themes that emerged, reflecting the value of mentorship in OSH training, were: characterizing the elements of mentoring, how mentorship can improve OSH training, and recommended practices for designing a program across two different work settings. We conceptualize the goals of mentorship within a broader social ecological framework, that is, to support OSH learning so workers will advocate for broader safety and health changes with credibility and a feeling of empowerment.
{"title":"Exploring Mentorship in Union and Non-Union Occupational Safety and Health Training Programs.","authors":"Isabel Cuervo, Ashlee Fitch, Diane Stein, Sherry L Baron","doi":"10.1177/10482911231153676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911231153676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few studies have explored mentorship's value in occupational safety and health (OSH) training that focuses on worker empowerment in blue-collar occupations. Through a university and union collaboration, we examined mentorship programs as a promising enhancement to ongoing OSH training to foster worker leadership development in organizations focused on worker empowerment. Union-based worker-trainers from 11 large manufacturing facilities across the United States and worker-trainers affiliated with 11 Latinx Worker Centers in the New York City area were interviewed. Rapid Evaluation and Assessment Methods informed study design. The themes that emerged, reflecting the value of mentorship in OSH training, were: characterizing the elements of mentoring, how mentorship can improve OSH training, and recommended practices for designing a program across two different work settings. We conceptualize the goals of mentorship within a broader social ecological framework, that is, to support OSH learning so workers will advocate for broader safety and health changes with credibility and a feeling of empowerment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 4","pages":"265-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/ea/10.1177_10482911231153676.PMC9941801.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9378043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/10482911221150237
Mohamed F Jeebhay, Rajen N Naidoo, Saloshni Naidoo, Shahieda Adams, Muzimkhulu Zungu, Spo Kgalomono, Nisha Naicker, Barry Kistnasamy
Workplaces are nodes for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 transmission and require strategies to protect workers' health. This article reports on the South African national coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) strategy that sought to ensure workers' health, protect the economic activity, safeguard livelihoods and support health services. Data from the Occupational Health Surveillance System, Surveillance System of Sentinel Hospital Sites, and government databases (public sector health worker and Compensation Fund data) was supplemented by peer-reviewed articles and grey literature. A multipronged, multi-stakeholder response to occupational health and safety (OHS) policy development, risk management, health surveillance, information, and training was adopted, underpinned by scientific input, through collaboration between government, organized labour, employer bodies, academia, and community partners. This resulted in government-promulgated legislation addressing OHS, sectoral guidelines, and work-related COVID-19 worker's compensation. The OHS Workstream of the National Department of Health provided leadership and technical support for COVID-specific workplace guidelines and practices, surveillance, information, and training, as well as a workplace-based vaccination strategy.
{"title":"Strengthening Social Compact and Innovative Health Sector Collaborations in Addressing COVID-19 in South African Workplaces.","authors":"Mohamed F Jeebhay, Rajen N Naidoo, Saloshni Naidoo, Shahieda Adams, Muzimkhulu Zungu, Spo Kgalomono, Nisha Naicker, Barry Kistnasamy","doi":"10.1177/10482911221150237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221150237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workplaces are nodes for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 transmission and require strategies to protect workers' health. This article reports on the South African national coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) strategy that sought to ensure workers' health, protect the economic activity, safeguard livelihoods and support health services. Data from the Occupational Health Surveillance System, Surveillance System of Sentinel Hospital Sites, and government databases (public sector health worker and Compensation Fund data) was supplemented by peer-reviewed articles and grey literature. A multipronged, multi-stakeholder response to occupational health and safety (OHS) policy development, risk management, health surveillance, information, and training was adopted, underpinned by scientific input, through collaboration between government, organized labour, employer bodies, academia, and community partners. This resulted in government-promulgated legislation addressing OHS, sectoral guidelines, and work-related COVID-19 worker's compensation. The OHS Workstream of the National Department of Health provided leadership and technical support for COVID-specific workplace guidelines and practices, surveillance, information, and training, as well as a workplace-based vaccination strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 4","pages":"288-303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/43/10.1177_10482911221150237.PMC9852971.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10798930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-16DOI: 10.1177/10482911221146869
{"title":"Erratum to \"Barrier Face Coverings for Workers\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/10482911221146869","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10482911221146869","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"10482911221146869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10361360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-29DOI: 10.1177/10482911221142305
Devan Hawkins
The argument is clearly not scientifically sound. We all know that correlation does not mean causation. Even if there is some arbitrary point that can be defined as the “beginning” of capitalism, the question still remains about the extent to which any positive changes in well-being and health can be attributed to capitalism itself. However, the fact remains that life expectancy globally has increased dramatically over the past 200 years. So explaining why these advances have occurred is important both to ensure that these gains continue and so that these improvements can also occur in parts of the world that have not experienced similar growths in life expectancy. Fortunately, Steven Johnson makes a compelling case in Extra life: A short history of living longer for the variety of advances that have resulted in improved life expectancy over the past 200 years. In each chapter, Johnson documents an innovation that he argues contributed to these improvements in life expectancy. Far from suggesting that these advances are due to capitalism, Johnson’s book suggests that it has been capitalism itself that has created some of the most persistent challenges to health. In turn, many of the advances that have helped us live longer required actions of activists, doctors, and public health practitioners to counter these effects. As Johnson describes early in his book, for most of human history, especially since the agricultural revolution, there were no major changes in life expectancy: “millennia pass with almost no meaningful change, followed by a sudden, unprecedented spikes over the past two centuries (p. xxxi).” When these changes did begin to occur, they were not shared equally. While such a sad fact seem obvious to us now, where we have witnessed the most pernicious effects of the COVID-19 along with many other causes of death, like heart disease and cancer, fall disproportionately on the poor and disadvantaged, the reality of inequitable increases in life expectancy was not always apparent. In the 1960s, Johnson describes how researchers using death records from the British Aristocracy found how unequal life expectancy was:
{"title":"Naming the Problem","authors":"Devan Hawkins","doi":"10.1177/10482911221142305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221142305","url":null,"abstract":"The argument is clearly not scientifically sound. We all know that correlation does not mean causation. Even if there is some arbitrary point that can be defined as the “beginning” of capitalism, the question still remains about the extent to which any positive changes in well-being and health can be attributed to capitalism itself. However, the fact remains that life expectancy globally has increased dramatically over the past 200 years. So explaining why these advances have occurred is important both to ensure that these gains continue and so that these improvements can also occur in parts of the world that have not experienced similar growths in life expectancy. Fortunately, Steven Johnson makes a compelling case in Extra life: A short history of living longer for the variety of advances that have resulted in improved life expectancy over the past 200 years. In each chapter, Johnson documents an innovation that he argues contributed to these improvements in life expectancy. Far from suggesting that these advances are due to capitalism, Johnson’s book suggests that it has been capitalism itself that has created some of the most persistent challenges to health. In turn, many of the advances that have helped us live longer required actions of activists, doctors, and public health practitioners to counter these effects. As Johnson describes early in his book, for most of human history, especially since the agricultural revolution, there were no major changes in life expectancy: “millennia pass with almost no meaningful change, followed by a sudden, unprecedented spikes over the past two centuries (p. xxxi).” When these changes did begin to occur, they were not shared equally. While such a sad fact seem obvious to us now, where we have witnessed the most pernicious effects of the COVID-19 along with many other causes of death, like heart disease and cancer, fall disproportionately on the poor and disadvantaged, the reality of inequitable increases in life expectancy was not always apparent. In the 1960s, Johnson describes how researchers using death records from the British Aristocracy found how unequal life expectancy was:","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"324 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48478462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01DOI: 10.1177/10482911221116664
Lisa M Brosseau, Jeffrey Stull
Face coverings have been recommended for the public and workers to prevent person-to-person transmission of COVID-19. Throughout 2020, guidelines for face coverings recommended multiple layers worn tightly against the face with straps or ear loops. This article briefly describes a new ASTM 3502 Standard Specification for Barrier Face Coverings (BFCs) and the development of performance criteria for workplace BFCs ahead of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS). We also describe a method for comparing the effect on the time to receipt of an infectious dose (ID) of BFCs with varying degrees of inward leakage (personal protection) and outward leakage (source control). The role of BFCs in workplace settings during the pandemic and for exposure to infectious respiratory organisms after the pandemic remains in question. It will be important for occupational health and safety professionals to recognize their limitations in contrast with respiratory protection.
{"title":"Feature, Barrier Face Coverings for Workers.","authors":"Lisa M Brosseau, Jeffrey Stull","doi":"10.1177/10482911221116664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221116664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face coverings have been recommended for the public and workers to prevent person-to-person transmission of COVID-19. Throughout 2020, guidelines for face coverings recommended multiple layers worn tightly against the face with straps or ear loops. This article briefly describes a new ASTM 3502 Standard Specification for Barrier Face Coverings (BFCs) and the development of performance criteria for workplace BFCs ahead of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS). We also describe a method for comparing the effect on the time to receipt of an infectious dose (ID) of BFCs with varying degrees of inward leakage (personal protection) and outward leakage (source control). The role of BFCs in workplace settings during the pandemic and for exposure to infectious respiratory organisms after the pandemic remains in question. It will be important for occupational health and safety professionals to recognize their limitations in contrast with respiratory protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 3","pages":"182-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10409340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01Epub Date: 2022-09-13DOI: 10.1177/10482911221124558
Margaret Whitley, Ashley Banks
Breastfeeding inequities by race are a persistent public health problem in the United States. Inequities in occupation and working conditions likely contribute to relatively less breastfeeding among Black compared to White mothers, yet little research has addressed these interrelationships. Here, we offer a critical review of the literature and a conceptual framework to guide future research about work and racial inequities in breastfeeding. There is a strong public health case for promoting breastfeeding equity for mothers across race groups and occupation types. Existing theory suggests that employment opportunities and working conditions are a likely pathway that connects structural racism to Black-White breastfeeding inequities, in addition to other known factors. We propose a new conceptual model for studying the interrelationships among work, race, and breastfeeding outcomes.
{"title":"Work as an Understudied Driver of Racial Inequities in Breastfeeding.","authors":"Margaret Whitley, Ashley Banks","doi":"10.1177/10482911221124558","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10482911221124558","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breastfeeding inequities by race are a persistent public health problem in the United States. Inequities in occupation and working conditions likely contribute to relatively less breastfeeding among Black compared to White mothers, yet little research has addressed these interrelationships. Here, we offer a critical review of the literature and a conceptual framework to guide future research about work and racial inequities in breastfeeding. There is a strong public health case for promoting breastfeeding equity for mothers across race groups and occupation types. Existing theory suggests that employment opportunities and working conditions are a likely pathway that connects structural racism to Black-White breastfeeding inequities, in addition to other known factors. We propose a new conceptual model for studying the interrelationships among work, race, and breastfeeding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 3","pages":"189-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703873/pdf/nihms-1844546.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9472995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01Epub Date: 2022-09-22DOI: 10.1177/10482911221126271
Laura Punnett
The root causes of health care worker strain and depression include excessive job demands, extended work schedules, little decision-making opportunity, assault, bullying, and fear of injury. Potential links between working conditions and opioid overuse have also been discussed, beginning with psychological job strain or with physical pain leading to medication use. Promising solutions have been identified and many would be cost-effective, as enhanced working conditions could improve workers' mental health, job satisfaction, retention, and patient outcomes. Considering the number of health care workers leaving work during the global COVID-19 pandemic, it is urgent to address preventable root causes. In 2021, the US Congress called for educating health workers and first responders on the primary prevention of mental health conditions and substance use disorders. The CDC issued a Request for Information; this submission summarized research from CPH-NEW, a NIOSH Center of Excellence in Total Worker Health®, supplemented by a selective literature review.
{"title":"Response to NIOSH Request for Information on Interventions to Prevent Work-Related Stress and Support Health Worker Mental Health.","authors":"Laura Punnett","doi":"10.1177/10482911221126271","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10482911221126271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The root causes of health care worker strain and depression include excessive job demands, extended work schedules, little decision-making opportunity, assault, bullying, and fear of injury. Potential links between working conditions and opioid overuse have also been discussed, beginning with psychological job strain or with physical pain leading to medication use. Promising solutions have been identified and many would be cost-effective, as enhanced working conditions could improve workers' mental health, job satisfaction, retention, and patient outcomes. Considering the number of health care workers leaving work during the global COVID-19 pandemic, it is urgent to address preventable root causes. In 2021, the US Congress called for educating health workers and first responders on the primary prevention of mental health conditions and substance use disorders. The CDC issued a Request for Information; this submission summarized research from CPH-NEW, a NIOSH Center of Excellence in <i>Total Worker Health</i>®, supplemented by a selective literature review.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 3","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9206273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-26DOI: 10.1177/10482911221134515
M. Rossol
This article follows two entertainment industry COVID-19 worker safety programs from inception through implementation. The first plan was developed by the four major film industry unions in concert with their expert consultants. The second plan for live theater was initiated by the Broadway League, a national trade association for the theater owners, operators, producers, presenters, and general managers in North American cities and their suppliers of goods and services. The efficacy of the plans to provide cast and crew with proper industrial hygiene measures such as ventilation and protective masks is compared by the author.
{"title":"Comparison of Two Entertainment Industry COVID-19 Programs","authors":"M. Rossol","doi":"10.1177/10482911221134515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221134515","url":null,"abstract":"This article follows two entertainment industry COVID-19 worker safety programs from inception through implementation. The first plan was developed by the four major film industry unions in concert with their expert consultants. The second plan for live theater was initiated by the Broadway League, a national trade association for the theater owners, operators, producers, presenters, and general managers in North American cities and their suppliers of goods and services. The efficacy of the plans to provide cast and crew with proper industrial hygiene measures such as ventilation and protective masks is compared by the author.","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"109 1","pages":"171 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78235806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-24DOI: 10.1177/10482911221121322
James Goodwin
In January 2022, almost one year to the day after President Donald Trump exited the White House, the Supreme Court handed down a shocking decision that effectively overturned an emergency standard issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to protect workers from becoming infected by COVID-19. That standard represented one of the most aggressive steps taken by President Joe Biden to control a pandemic made substantially worse by his predecessor’s blundering and oftentimes reckless responses. Unsurprisingly, all three of Trump’s appointees to the Supreme Court were part of the majority that agreed to block the Biden rule in an unsigned per curiam decision. As this case illustrates, the Trump administration’s success in reshaping the federal judiciary with archconservative appointees is a big part of its anti-regulatory legacy that the United States will be living with for decades. It also underscores the enormity of the task we face in undoing the damage of the Trump years in order to better meet myriad pressing policy challenges, including growing economic inequality, systemic racism, and the climate crisis. In his latest book, Demolition Agenda: How Trump Tried to Dismantle American Government, and What Biden Needs to Do to Save It, leading regulatory law scholar Thomas McGarity takes stock of the damage the Trump administration did to the regulatory system so that we might start picking up the pieces and begin the longer project of bringing it back better and stronger. As the book is intended for a general audience, McGarity begins with a primer on the role of our regulatory system in our constitutional democracy and the historical successes it has achieved in protecting people and the environment against unacceptable risks. The “protective edifice,” as he calls it, “consists of the foundational laws that Congress has enacted over the years and the agencies that Congress has created to implement those laws by implementing regulations, imposing permit requirements, and enforcing the laws and regulations.” The entirety of our regulatory system is oriented toward the achievement of one “overarching purpose”—namely, “to protect people, places, and species, from polluters, profiteers and plunderers” (p. 14). This introduction also highlights the dedicated public servants who work for our protector agencies: The “scientists, engineers, economists who make up the civil service” and “play essential roles” in ensuring that the protective promise of our public interest laws is achieved in the real world. Significantly, in the story that McGarity tells, these public servants, thanks to their professionalism and strong employment protections, emerged among the heroes in the effort to limit the Trump administration’s damage. Another important piece of the background laid out in the book is how the disparate elements of the modern conservative movement came to coalesce around the anti-regulatory agenda that would become a defining tra
{"title":"At a Crossroads: Environmental and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations After Trump","authors":"James Goodwin","doi":"10.1177/10482911221121322","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221121322","url":null,"abstract":"In January 2022, almost one year to the day after President Donald Trump exited the White House, the Supreme Court handed down a shocking decision that effectively overturned an emergency standard issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to protect workers from becoming infected by COVID-19. That standard represented one of the most aggressive steps taken by President Joe Biden to control a pandemic made substantially worse by his predecessor’s blundering and oftentimes reckless responses. Unsurprisingly, all three of Trump’s appointees to the Supreme Court were part of the majority that agreed to block the Biden rule in an unsigned per curiam decision. As this case illustrates, the Trump administration’s success in reshaping the federal judiciary with archconservative appointees is a big part of its anti-regulatory legacy that the United States will be living with for decades. It also underscores the enormity of the task we face in undoing the damage of the Trump years in order to better meet myriad pressing policy challenges, including growing economic inequality, systemic racism, and the climate crisis. In his latest book, Demolition Agenda: How Trump Tried to Dismantle American Government, and What Biden Needs to Do to Save It, leading regulatory law scholar Thomas McGarity takes stock of the damage the Trump administration did to the regulatory system so that we might start picking up the pieces and begin the longer project of bringing it back better and stronger. As the book is intended for a general audience, McGarity begins with a primer on the role of our regulatory system in our constitutional democracy and the historical successes it has achieved in protecting people and the environment against unacceptable risks. The “protective edifice,” as he calls it, “consists of the foundational laws that Congress has enacted over the years and the agencies that Congress has created to implement those laws by implementing regulations, imposing permit requirements, and enforcing the laws and regulations.” The entirety of our regulatory system is oriented toward the achievement of one “overarching purpose”—namely, “to protect people, places, and species, from polluters, profiteers and plunderers” (p. 14). This introduction also highlights the dedicated public servants who work for our protector agencies: The “scientists, engineers, economists who make up the civil service” and “play essential roles” in ensuring that the protective promise of our public interest laws is achieved in the real world. Significantly, in the story that McGarity tells, these public servants, thanks to their professionalism and strong employment protections, emerged among the heroes in the effort to limit the Trump administration’s damage. Another important piece of the background laid out in the book is how the disparate elements of the modern conservative movement came to coalesce around the anti-regulatory agenda that would become a defining tra","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"230 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44943627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}