Pub Date : 2022-05-01Epub Date: 2022-02-04DOI: 10.1177/10482911221074680
Nicolette Carlan, Terri Szymanski, Jennifer Van Zetten, Margo Hilbrecht, Philip Bigelow
Workers at a multi-site retailer were concerned that they were experiencing higher than anticipated work-related musculoskeletal disabilities (MSDs). They approached union leadership and academic researchers and a Participatory Action Research (PAR) project was developed which culminated in a targeted online Physical Loads Survey (PLS). The goal was to initiate discussions to design a preventative collaborative ergonomic program. Survey results confirmed that during a shift, workers had significant exposure to standing, carrying loads of more than 25 lbs, pushing and pulling loads greater than 225 lbs, and repetitive arm and hand movements. The successful survey was the first step in the development of a proactive health and safety program. The union proceeded without management participation and was able to move beyond knowledge creation to knowledge activism and change.
{"title":"The Path from Survey Development to Knowledge Activism: A Case Study of the Use of a Physical Loads Survey in a Retail Workplace.","authors":"Nicolette Carlan, Terri Szymanski, Jennifer Van Zetten, Margo Hilbrecht, Philip Bigelow","doi":"10.1177/10482911221074680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221074680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workers at a multi-site retailer were concerned that they were experiencing higher than anticipated work-related musculoskeletal disabilities (MSDs). They approached union leadership and academic researchers and a Participatory Action Research (PAR) project was developed which culminated in a targeted online Physical Loads Survey (PLS). The goal was to initiate discussions to design a preventative collaborative ergonomic program. Survey results confirmed that during a shift, workers had significant exposure to standing, carrying loads of more than 25 lbs, pushing and pulling loads greater than 225 lbs, and repetitive arm and hand movements. The successful survey was the first step in the development of a proactive health and safety program. The union proceeded without management participation and was able to move beyond knowledge creation to knowledge activism and change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014667/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39586880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-01Epub Date: 2022-01-21DOI: 10.1177/10482911211065751
Leanne McCallum, Michelle Lackovic, Olivia Whitcomb, Adrienne Katner, Daniel Harrington
Guestworkers are a critical labor component of many industries considered essential to U.S. infrastructure. Despite their essential role in the U.S. labor force, guestworkers are vulnerable to exploitative labor practices. The COVID-19 pandemic compounded guestworkers' vulnerability to include a lack of public health protective measures in addition to longstanding labor abuses. The pandemic has created greater public health awareness about structural determinants of health inequities, such as unsafe and exploitative working conditions. As public health increases its focus on social and structural determinants of health, it can contribute to improved labor conditions for guestworkers. This article highlights guestworkers' experiences in Louisiana's crawfish industry to demonstrate the marginalized role of guestworker labor in a major Louisiana industry. This article also examines local public health approaches that can bring attention and resources to labor issues.
{"title":"Louisiana Guestworker Health and Safety a Necessary Component of Health Equity: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Leanne McCallum, Michelle Lackovic, Olivia Whitcomb, Adrienne Katner, Daniel Harrington","doi":"10.1177/10482911211065751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911211065751","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guestworkers are a critical labor component of many industries considered essential to U.S. infrastructure. Despite their essential role in the U.S. labor force, guestworkers are vulnerable to exploitative labor practices. The COVID-19 pandemic compounded guestworkers' vulnerability to include a lack of public health protective measures in addition to longstanding labor abuses. The pandemic has created greater public health awareness about structural determinants of health inequities, such as unsafe and exploitative working conditions. As public health increases its focus on social and structural determinants of health, it can contribute to improved labor conditions for guestworkers. This article highlights guestworkers' experiences in Louisiana's crawfish industry to demonstrate the marginalized role of guestworker labor in a major Louisiana industry. This article also examines local public health approaches that can bring attention and resources to labor issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014335/pdf/10.1177_10482911211065751.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39845392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-01Epub Date: 2021-12-16DOI: 10.1177/10482911211066963
Emma K Tsui, Emily Franzosa, Emilia F Vignola, Isabel Cuervo, Paul Landsbergis, Jennifer Zelnick, Sherry Baron
Workers engaged in reproductive labor-the caring work that maintains society and supports its growth-contribute to societal health while also enduring the harms of precarious labor and substantial work stress. How can we conceptualize the effects of reproductive labor on workers and society simultaneously? In this commentary, we analyze four types of more relational and less relational careworkers-homeless shelter workers, school food workers, home care aides, and household cleaners-during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then make a case for a new model of societal health that recognizes the contributions of careworkers and healthy carework. Our model includes multi-sectoral social policies supporting both worker health and societal health and acknowledges several dimensions of work stress for careworkers that have received insufficient attention. Ultimately, we argue that the effects of reproductive labor on workers and society must be considered jointly, a recognition that offers an urgent vision for repairing and advancing societal health.
{"title":"Recognizing careworkers' contributions to improving the social determinants of health: A call for supporting healthy carework.","authors":"Emma K Tsui, Emily Franzosa, Emilia F Vignola, Isabel Cuervo, Paul Landsbergis, Jennifer Zelnick, Sherry Baron","doi":"10.1177/10482911211066963","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10482911211066963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workers engaged in reproductive labor-the caring work that maintains society and supports its growth-contribute to societal health while also enduring the harms of precarious labor and substantial work stress. How can we conceptualize the effects of reproductive labor on workers and society simultaneously? In this commentary, we analyze four types of more relational and less relational careworkers-homeless shelter workers, school food workers, home care aides, and household cleaners-during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then make a case for a new model of societal health that recognizes the contributions of careworkers and healthy carework. Our model includes multi-sectoral social policies supporting both worker health and societal health and acknowledges several dimensions of work stress for careworkers that have received insufficient attention. Ultimately, we argue that the effects of reproductive labor on workers and society must be considered jointly, a recognition that offers an urgent vision for repairing and advancing societal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39730090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-01Epub Date: 2021-12-27DOI: 10.1177/10482911211069621
Nosimilo Mlangeni, Karen Du Preez, Moses Mokone, Molebogeng Malotle, Sophia Kisting, Jonathan Ramodike, Muzimkhulu Zungu
In South Africa, 15 percent of informal economy workers are street vendors. The organization of occupational health services in the country is fragmented and does not cover informal workers. Conditions of work make informal workers extremely vulnerable to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) exposure. In this study, a qualitative risk assessment was conducted among street vendors, followed by focus group discussions. Interpretation of data was according to major themes extracted from discussions. Workers are exposed to several occupational health hazards identified during the risk assessment. There is a lack of workplace HIV and TB services and overall poor access to healthcare. Street vendors, especially females, are at higher risk of HIV, due to gender inequalities. Comprehensive gender-sensitive training on occupational health and safety, HIV, and TB should be prioritized. To reach Universal Health Coverage and achieve the Sustainable Developmental Goals' targets, the health system should improve services for informal economy workers.
{"title":"HIV and TB Workplace Program for Street Vendors: A Situational Analysis.","authors":"Nosimilo Mlangeni, Karen Du Preez, Moses Mokone, Molebogeng Malotle, Sophia Kisting, Jonathan Ramodike, Muzimkhulu Zungu","doi":"10.1177/10482911211069621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911211069621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In South Africa, 15 percent of informal economy workers are street vendors. The organization of occupational health services in the country is fragmented and does not cover informal workers. Conditions of work make informal workers extremely vulnerable to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) exposure. In this study, a qualitative risk assessment was conducted among street vendors, followed by focus group discussions. Interpretation of data was according to major themes extracted from discussions. Workers are exposed to several occupational health hazards identified during the risk assessment. There is a lack of workplace HIV and TB services and overall poor access to healthcare. Street vendors, especially females, are at higher risk of HIV, due to gender inequalities. Comprehensive gender-sensitive training on occupational health and safety, HIV, and TB should be prioritized. To reach Universal Health Coverage and achieve the Sustainable Developmental Goals' targets, the health system should improve services for informal economy workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39764494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-01Epub Date: 2022-02-09DOI: 10.1177/10482911221079056
Janice Martell, Tee Guidotti
Northern Ontario gold and uranium miners represent the largest cohort of industrial laborers who were historically exposed to daily nonconsensual industrial medical treatments involving the inhalation of finely ground aluminum dust known as McIntyre Powder. The daughter of one of those miners founded the McIntyre Powder Project in 2015 to document health issues in exposed miners, in an effort to determine whether her father's Parkinson's was related to aluminum inhalation. In response, 553 miners registered with the McIntyre Powder Project between 2015 and 2021 either directly or by their next-of-kin. This paper compiles their lived experiences of being subjected to McIntyre Powder, which contrasts starkly with the official narrative of the northern Ontario mining industry, which licensed its use globally. Additionally, this paper illuminates concerning industrial practices that emerged from the miners' disclosures, involving incentivized claims suppression, and raising serious questions about the effectiveness of medical screening and regulatory enforcement.
{"title":"Breathe Deep, Boys: Voices of the McIntyre Powder Project Miners.","authors":"Janice Martell, Tee Guidotti","doi":"10.1177/10482911221079056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221079056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Northern Ontario gold and uranium miners represent the largest cohort of industrial laborers who were historically exposed to daily nonconsensual industrial medical treatments involving the inhalation of finely ground aluminum dust known as McIntyre Powder. The daughter of one of those miners founded the McIntyre Powder Project in 2015 to document health issues in exposed miners, in an effort to determine whether her father's Parkinson's was related to aluminum inhalation. In response, 553 miners registered with the McIntyre Powder Project between 2015 and 2021 either directly or by their next-of-kin. This paper compiles their lived experiences of being subjected to McIntyre Powder, which contrasts starkly with the official narrative of the northern Ontario mining industry, which licensed its use globally. Additionally, this paper illuminates concerning industrial practices that emerged from the miners' disclosures, involving incentivized claims suppression, and raising serious questions about the effectiveness of medical screening and regulatory enforcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"48-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/ec/10.1177_10482911221079056.PMC9014676.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39902754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-15DOI: 10.1177/10482911221090817
C. Slatin, Darius D. Sivin
As of this issue of New Solutions (Volume 32, Issue 1), Darius Sivin has taken the reins as Editor in Chief. Since receiving his PhD from the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Darius has spent twenty years in the labor movement, giving him a wealth of experience with occupational health on the shop floor, at the bargaining table and at the policy level. In this time, he has worked with environmental justice advocates, policymakers and with academic researchers. He brings all of this experience with him to New Solutions. Charles Levenstein was the journal’s founding editor and built it from the ground up, working closely in the first seven years (1990–1997) with the founding publisher, Tony Mazzocchi, Secretary Treasurer of the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Union (OCAW) at the time. In 1997, the OCAW discontinued publishing the journal, which was successfully moved to Baywood Publishing, a small publisher of academic journals which included the International Journal of Health Services, a politically similar journal founded by Vincente Navarro. In 2007, a transition team of Craig Slatin, Beth Rosenberg, and Eduardo Siqueira worked to sustain the journal as Charles prepared to step down as editor. In 2011, Craig became the editor. In 2015, Baywood Publishing restructured and sold its journals to SAGE Publications which has been the publisher of New Solutions since that time. Along the way the journal has been supported by a broad network of board members, authors, reviewers, and friends. Karla Armenti and Michael Lax have long-served as the editorial board’s co-chairs. So many people at different times have made valuable contributions to the journal, organizing conferences, engaging in planning retreats, bringing in new authors, guest editing special issues, working as part of the editorial and advisory boards and the editorial team, and so many more efforts too numerous to list. Now, at the start of our thirty-second year, we are grateful to all those who have made the journal what it is today, and we look forward to the work that these networks will do with Darius to sustain New Solutions’ mission as set out by Charles Levenstein in the first issue. Too frequently... the scientists and public health professionals dealing with these [occupational and environmental public health] problems view the citizen activists and trade unionists who have been stirred to action as barbarians or hysterics who get in the way of “good science.” Professionals miss great opportunities to educate and, equally as important, to learn from this public health movement.
{"title":"A New Editor, and a Renewed Focus on Environmental and Work Environment Justice with Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity","authors":"C. Slatin, Darius D. Sivin","doi":"10.1177/10482911221090817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221090817","url":null,"abstract":"As of this issue of New Solutions (Volume 32, Issue 1), Darius Sivin has taken the reins as Editor in Chief. Since receiving his PhD from the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Darius has spent twenty years in the labor movement, giving him a wealth of experience with occupational health on the shop floor, at the bargaining table and at the policy level. In this time, he has worked with environmental justice advocates, policymakers and with academic researchers. He brings all of this experience with him to New Solutions. Charles Levenstein was the journal’s founding editor and built it from the ground up, working closely in the first seven years (1990–1997) with the founding publisher, Tony Mazzocchi, Secretary Treasurer of the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Union (OCAW) at the time. In 1997, the OCAW discontinued publishing the journal, which was successfully moved to Baywood Publishing, a small publisher of academic journals which included the International Journal of Health Services, a politically similar journal founded by Vincente Navarro. In 2007, a transition team of Craig Slatin, Beth Rosenberg, and Eduardo Siqueira worked to sustain the journal as Charles prepared to step down as editor. In 2011, Craig became the editor. In 2015, Baywood Publishing restructured and sold its journals to SAGE Publications which has been the publisher of New Solutions since that time. Along the way the journal has been supported by a broad network of board members, authors, reviewers, and friends. Karla Armenti and Michael Lax have long-served as the editorial board’s co-chairs. So many people at different times have made valuable contributions to the journal, organizing conferences, engaging in planning retreats, bringing in new authors, guest editing special issues, working as part of the editorial and advisory boards and the editorial team, and so many more efforts too numerous to list. Now, at the start of our thirty-second year, we are grateful to all those who have made the journal what it is today, and we look forward to the work that these networks will do with Darius to sustain New Solutions’ mission as set out by Charles Levenstein in the first issue. Too frequently... the scientists and public health professionals dealing with these [occupational and environmental public health] problems view the citizen activists and trade unionists who have been stirred to action as barbarians or hysterics who get in the way of “good science.” Professionals miss great opportunities to educate and, equally as important, to learn from this public health movement.","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"4 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47432042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-11DOI: 10.1177/10482911221091988
J. Tessler
Karen Messing begins her latest book with the stories that must be told. The accounts that she shares in Bent Out of Shape loosen the wheels for everyone to tell as well— and to break their silence. Secrets keep the systems rolling, bodies hurting, and psyches broken along with its path. Karen Messing’s voice matters. She has been a critical contributor and feminist lens, globally, on the plight of women performing at work, in nontraditional as well as traditional jobs, and a guidepost for the engagement of workers’ voices and knowledge in occupational health research and intervention. New Solutions readers may be familiar with her prior ground-breaking works about why research conclusions based on male workers don’t apply to women, why scientists must talk to and learn from workers when conducting occupational health research, and the urgency to unpack the myths of “safe” and “light” women’s work through ergonomic analyses. In this remarkably personal and important book, Messing gleans stories from a 17 year-long collaboration between research scientists, legal scholars, and the members of Canadian trade union women’s committees. She brings us back to a time when the male gaze was unrelenting and ubiquitous, where men were entitled to comment, judge, and assess any aspect of women’s bodies, brains, and potential, especially at work. Although presenting a number of carefully detailed examples, Messing reflects on the gendered manipulations, humiliations, trickery, groping, and assaults that are institutionalized in so many low-wage or traditionally male workplaces. Shame excels at its primary goal: to maintain power relations and to sustain the status quo. Each generation has its own sickening version of these abuses and Messing shares hers. The mortar for the tiles of shame is laid early, reinforced everywhere, and residue remains despite a lifetime of intentionally routing it out and scraping it off with force. We know that poorly designed jobs often lead to injury and illness, and that such design can be physical, psychosocial, or economic. Shame about work-related injuries and illnesses—and the resultant silence—is only possible when workers are blamed, afraid of job loss if they leave or are fired, or fear retaliation and humiliation if they stay. The silence is compounded when complaints feed the external myths about women’s inability to perform the work as assigned, often work that shouldn’t have been designed that way for ANY human. Internalized beliefs that women’s bodies are “different, abnormal, weaker” contribute to such silence. Although acknowledging the grave injustices men face in unsafe workplaces, Messing reminds us “it is most often women (and gender non-conforming men) who experience a forced choice between gender equality and their health” (p. xvii). And why does Messing describe only cisgender women in this book? Messing clarifies in her introduction that “... in the unionized, low-paid workplaces (where her research was con
{"title":"Facing Down the Dragon, With Solidarity","authors":"J. Tessler","doi":"10.1177/10482911221091988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221091988","url":null,"abstract":"Karen Messing begins her latest book with the stories that must be told. The accounts that she shares in Bent Out of Shape loosen the wheels for everyone to tell as well— and to break their silence. Secrets keep the systems rolling, bodies hurting, and psyches broken along with its path. Karen Messing’s voice matters. She has been a critical contributor and feminist lens, globally, on the plight of women performing at work, in nontraditional as well as traditional jobs, and a guidepost for the engagement of workers’ voices and knowledge in occupational health research and intervention. New Solutions readers may be familiar with her prior ground-breaking works about why research conclusions based on male workers don’t apply to women, why scientists must talk to and learn from workers when conducting occupational health research, and the urgency to unpack the myths of “safe” and “light” women’s work through ergonomic analyses. In this remarkably personal and important book, Messing gleans stories from a 17 year-long collaboration between research scientists, legal scholars, and the members of Canadian trade union women’s committees. She brings us back to a time when the male gaze was unrelenting and ubiquitous, where men were entitled to comment, judge, and assess any aspect of women’s bodies, brains, and potential, especially at work. Although presenting a number of carefully detailed examples, Messing reflects on the gendered manipulations, humiliations, trickery, groping, and assaults that are institutionalized in so many low-wage or traditionally male workplaces. Shame excels at its primary goal: to maintain power relations and to sustain the status quo. Each generation has its own sickening version of these abuses and Messing shares hers. The mortar for the tiles of shame is laid early, reinforced everywhere, and residue remains despite a lifetime of intentionally routing it out and scraping it off with force. We know that poorly designed jobs often lead to injury and illness, and that such design can be physical, psychosocial, or economic. Shame about work-related injuries and illnesses—and the resultant silence—is only possible when workers are blamed, afraid of job loss if they leave or are fired, or fear retaliation and humiliation if they stay. The silence is compounded when complaints feed the external myths about women’s inability to perform the work as assigned, often work that shouldn’t have been designed that way for ANY human. Internalized beliefs that women’s bodies are “different, abnormal, weaker” contribute to such silence. Although acknowledging the grave injustices men face in unsafe workplaces, Messing reminds us “it is most often women (and gender non-conforming men) who experience a forced choice between gender equality and their health” (p. xvii). And why does Messing describe only cisgender women in this book? Messing clarifies in her introduction that “... in the unionized, low-paid workplaces (where her research was con","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"161 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43921651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-11DOI: 10.1177/10482911221084382
Yawen Cheng, Yi-Ling Huang, L. Lee
Occupational asbestos exposure was prevalent in Taiwan, but asbestos-related diseases (ARDs) have rarely been recognized. We conducted in-depth face-to-face interviews with 16 patients with ARDs. All of them had worked in industries known for high asbestos exposure. However, only three patients had filed workers’ compensation (WC) claims, and of them, only two patients were approved. Reasons for the low compensation rate of ARDs could be divided into institutional barriers related to the flaws of the WC system and non-institutional barriers related to the knowledge status, causal interpretation, and social situations of individual workers. The Labor Occupational Accident Insurance and Protection Act passed in April 2021 has responded to the under-compensation of occupational diseases. However, the new act's effects toward improving the recognition of ARDs remain questionable. Our findings indicated that additional efforts are needed to remove non-institutional barriers hindering workers’ ability to ensure their compensation rights.
{"title":"Explaining the Invisibility of Asbestos-Related Diseases in the Taiwan Workers’ Compensation System","authors":"Yawen Cheng, Yi-Ling Huang, L. Lee","doi":"10.1177/10482911221084382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221084382","url":null,"abstract":"Occupational asbestos exposure was prevalent in Taiwan, but asbestos-related diseases (ARDs) have rarely been recognized. We conducted in-depth face-to-face interviews with 16 patients with ARDs. All of them had worked in industries known for high asbestos exposure. However, only three patients had filed workers’ compensation (WC) claims, and of them, only two patients were approved. Reasons for the low compensation rate of ARDs could be divided into institutional barriers related to the flaws of the WC system and non-institutional barriers related to the knowledge status, causal interpretation, and social situations of individual workers. The Labor Occupational Accident Insurance and Protection Act passed in April 2021 has responded to the under-compensation of occupational diseases. However, the new act's effects toward improving the recognition of ARDs remain questionable. Our findings indicated that additional efforts are needed to remove non-institutional barriers hindering workers’ ability to ensure their compensation rights.","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"106 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47171701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-04DOI: 10.1177/10482911221083666
B. Choi, J. Yoon, Ji-Hwan Kim, Jung-Gil Yoo, Glorian Sorensen, Seung-Sup Kim
Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) at work has been neglected in occupational health research despite its importance for female workers’ health. This study investigated the association between hours of working alone and poor menstrual health among 740 cosmetics saleswomen in South Korea. Hours of working alone in a day were classified into 4 categories. MHM was measured by asking “Over the past six months, have you ever experienced that you could not change your sanitary pad when you need to change it at work?” We also measured the experience of dermatopathy due to unchanged sanitary pads. Cosmetics saleswomen who worked alone for 3 h or more in a day reported a higher prevalence of ever being unable to change the sanitary pads (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37–2.46) and dermatopathy due to unchanged sanitary pads (PR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.18–3.59) than those who worked alone less than 1 h in a day.
{"title":"Working Alone, Limited Restroom Accessibility, and Poor Menstrual Health Among Cosmetics Saleswomen in South Korea","authors":"B. Choi, J. Yoon, Ji-Hwan Kim, Jung-Gil Yoo, Glorian Sorensen, Seung-Sup Kim","doi":"10.1177/10482911221083666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221083666","url":null,"abstract":"Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) at work has been neglected in occupational health research despite its importance for female workers’ health. This study investigated the association between hours of working alone and poor menstrual health among 740 cosmetics saleswomen in South Korea. Hours of working alone in a day were classified into 4 categories. MHM was measured by asking “Over the past six months, have you ever experienced that you could not change your sanitary pad when you need to change it at work?” We also measured the experience of dermatopathy due to unchanged sanitary pads. Cosmetics saleswomen who worked alone for 3 h or more in a day reported a higher prevalence of ever being unable to change the sanitary pads (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37–2.46) and dermatopathy due to unchanged sanitary pads (PR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.18–3.59) than those who worked alone less than 1 h in a day.","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"40 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41865366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-01DOI: 10.1177/10482911221078964
Elizabeth Mizelle, K. Larson, Caroline Doherty
In the United States, Latino farmworkers are disproportionately at risk for death from heat-related illnesses. To elicit Latino farmworker perceptions on their fluid intake and heat stress, a qualitative descriptive, community-informed research study was conducted in eastern North Carolina. A total of 28 Mexican farmworkers participated in one of 4 focus groups. Using content analysis and guided by Intersectionality theory, themes and subthemes were identified. The first theme was Absence of Protection, represented by 2 subthemes: (1a) Intense Climate Considerations; and (1b) Workplace Exploitation. The second theme, Freedom to Drink, included 2 subthemes: (2a) Distance and Distaste; and (2b) Culture of Farm Work. Farmworkers perceived extreme outdoor temperatures as the greatest workplace barrier to staying hydrated and reported water accessibility and quality issues. Farmworker fluid intake was influenced by interlocking social categories and power systems. Policy recommendations that prevent farmworker heat-related illness and promote hydration are discussed.
{"title":"Understanding Farmworker Fluid Intake Using Intersectionality Theory","authors":"Elizabeth Mizelle, K. Larson, Caroline Doherty","doi":"10.1177/10482911221078964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221078964","url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, Latino farmworkers are disproportionately at risk for death from heat-related illnesses. To elicit Latino farmworker perceptions on their fluid intake and heat stress, a qualitative descriptive, community-informed research study was conducted in eastern North Carolina. A total of 28 Mexican farmworkers participated in one of 4 focus groups. Using content analysis and guided by Intersectionality theory, themes and subthemes were identified. The first theme was Absence of Protection, represented by 2 subthemes: (1a) Intense Climate Considerations; and (1b) Workplace Exploitation. The second theme, Freedom to Drink, included 2 subthemes: (2a) Distance and Distaste; and (2b) Culture of Farm Work. Farmworkers perceived extreme outdoor temperatures as the greatest workplace barrier to staying hydrated and reported water accessibility and quality issues. Farmworker fluid intake was influenced by interlocking social categories and power systems. Policy recommendations that prevent farmworker heat-related illness and promote hydration are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"19 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46515823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}