首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Writing Research最新文献

英文 中文
Metacognitive Instruction for Peer Review Interaction in L2 Writing 第二语言写作中同伴评议互动的元认知指导
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05
G. Bui, A. Kong
{"title":"Metacognitive Instruction for Peer Review Interaction in L2 Writing","authors":"G. Bui, A. Kong","doi":"10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47204266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
English as a foreign language writers’ metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments 英语写作的元认知策略知识及其在多媒体环境下的写作表现
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.06
LT Qin, J. Zhang
{"title":"English as a foreign language writers’ metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments","authors":"LT Qin, J. Zhang","doi":"10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49147619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Book review: Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting 书评:观察写作:从击键记录和手写中的见解
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-03 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.08
Andreia Nunes, S. Castro
handwriting [Book Review of Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting by E. Lindgren, & K. Sullivan (Eds.). Journal of Writing Research, 11(1), 245-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.08 Contact: Andreia Nunes:, University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto| Portugal andreianunes@fpce.up.pt This article is published under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported license. Book review Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting
手写[《观察写作书评:对击键记录和手写的见解》,E.Lindgren和K.Sullivan(编辑),《写作研究杂志》,11(1),245-250。http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.08联系人:Andreia Nunes:,波尔图大学心理与教育科学学院,Rua Alfredo Allen,4200-135 Porto|葡萄牙andreianunes@fpce.up.pt这篇文章发表在知识共享署名非商业性无衍生作品3.0未发表许可证下。书评观察写作:从击键记录和手写中的见解
{"title":"Book review: Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting","authors":"Andreia Nunes, S. Castro","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.08","url":null,"abstract":"handwriting [Book Review of Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting by E. Lindgren, & K. Sullivan (Eds.). Journal of Writing Research, 11(1), 245-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.08 Contact: Andreia Nunes:, University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto| Portugal andreianunes@fpce.up.pt This article is published under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported license. Book review Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45650977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Textual Mediation in Simulated Nursing Handoffs: Examining How Student Writing Coordinates Action 模拟护理讲义中的语篇中介:考察学生写作如何协调动作
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.03
L. Campbell
In clinical nursing simulations, a group of students provide care for a robotic patient during a structured scenario. As are is transferred from one group to another, they participate in a patient handoff, with outgoing students passing key information onto incoming students. In healthcare, the nursing handoff is a critical and perilous communication moment that is mediated by a range of participants and texts. Drawing on observations and video recordings of 52 simulation handoffs in the United States, this article examines how two student designed texts—a collaborative patient chart and individual notes—are leveraged during the handoff. I also consider how handoff talk and writing changes as student nursing knowledge increases over the course of a year. By focusing on textual mediation of the simulated nursing handoff, this article contributes to existing research on professional writing pedagogy and to nursing scholarship on the handoff. Ultimately, it argues that a textual mediation framework can help bridge classroom and professional contexts by evaluating student writing not for how successfully it meets a set of imposed criteria but for how effectively it supports classroom activities.
在临床护理模拟中,一组学生在一个结构化的场景中为机器人病人提供护理。当他们从一个组转移到另一个组时,他们参与了一个耐心的交接,即将离任的学生将关键信息传递给即将入学的学生。在医疗保健中,护理交接是一个关键和危险的沟通时刻,由一系列参与者和文本调解。通过对美国52次模拟交接的观察和视频记录,本文研究了两个学生设计的文本——一个协作的病人图表和一个单独的笔记——在交接过程中是如何被利用的。我也考虑如何交接谈话和写作变化作为学生护理知识的增加在一年的过程中。本文通过对模拟护理交接的文本中介,为现有的专业写作教学法研究和交接护理学术研究做出贡献。最后,它认为文本中介框架可以帮助架起课堂和专业背景的桥梁,通过评估学生的写作,而不是看它是否成功地满足了一套强加的标准,而是看它如何有效地支持课堂活动。
{"title":"Textual Mediation in Simulated Nursing Handoffs: Examining How Student Writing Coordinates Action","authors":"L. Campbell","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.03","url":null,"abstract":"In clinical nursing simulations, a group of students provide care for a robotic patient during a structured scenario. As are is transferred from one group to another, they participate in a patient handoff, with outgoing students passing key information onto incoming students. In healthcare, the nursing handoff is a critical and perilous communication moment that is mediated by a range of participants and texts. Drawing on observations and video recordings of 52 simulation handoffs in the United States, this article examines how two student designed texts—a collaborative patient chart and individual notes—are leveraged during the handoff. I also consider how handoff talk and writing changes as student nursing knowledge increases over the course of a year. By focusing on textual mediation of the simulated nursing handoff, this article contributes to existing research on professional writing pedagogy and to nursing scholarship on the handoff. Ultimately, it argues that a textual mediation framework can help bridge classroom and professional contexts by evaluating student writing not for how successfully it meets a set of imposed criteria but for how effectively it supports classroom activities.","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46457189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Writing to Learn Increases Long-term Memory Consolidation: A Mental-chronometry and Computational-modeling Study of “Epistemic Writing” 写作学习增加长期记忆巩固:“认知写作”的心理计时和计算建模研究
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.07
Angelica M Silva, R. Limongi
{"title":"Writing to Learn Increases Long-term Memory Consolidation: A Mental-chronometry and Computational-modeling Study of “Epistemic Writing”","authors":"Angelica M Silva, R. Limongi","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.07","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45346234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Session Notes as a Professionalization Tool for Writing Center Staff: Conducting Discourse Analysis to Determine Training Efficacy and Tutor Growth 会话笔记作为写作中心工作人员的专业化工具:进行话语分析以确定培训效果和导师成长
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.05
G. Giaimo, Samantha J. Turner
{"title":"Session Notes as a Professionalization Tool for Writing Center Staff: Conducting Discourse Analysis to Determine Training Efficacy and Tutor Growth","authors":"G. Giaimo, Samantha J. Turner","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.05","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.05","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46954773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Dialog as a Bridge to Argumentative Writing 对话是议论文写作的桥梁
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.04
Yuchen Shi, F. Matos, D. Kuhn
{"title":"Dialog as a Bridge to Argumentative Writing","authors":"Yuchen Shi, F. Matos, D. Kuhn","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.04","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.04","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44857121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Participatory appropriation as a pathway to self-regulation in academic writing: The case of three BA essay writers in literature 参与挪用作为学术写作自我调节的途径——以三位文学学士论文作者为例
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.01
Raffaella Negretti, Špela Mežek
Apprenticeship in academic prose is a transformative experience (Hayot, 2014), and this paper investigates the development of self-regulation in three bachelor (BA) literature essay writers using the theoretical lens of participatory appropriation by Rogoff (1990, 2008), which seeks to explain how individuals undergo processes of development thanks to, and in interaction with, the social interaction. Students who learn to self-regulate towards concrete, achievable writing goals obtain higher levels of writing performance, i.e. text quality (Rogers & Graham, 2008; Graham, McKeown, Kiuhara & Harris, 2012; Graham & Perin, 2007). Metacognitive skills are integral to the development of genre knowledge and rhetorical effectiveness (Negretti, 2015). We thus investigate how interaction with a supervisor helps students orient themselves towards genre/discipline-relevant writing goals, how do they self-regulate towards these goals, how it helps students aligning with the stakeholders’ (the examiners) evaluation of the quality of writing. Data was collected through in-depth, qualitative interviews at three points in the term; interview data was also collected from the examiners after defense. Data was coded and analyzed in NVivo, using Pintrich’s (2004) heuristic. Results show that frequently students explicitly reported on or imagined the interaction with their supervisor: a sort of “dialogic think-aloud”. These dialogues often discussed genre-relevant aspects such as what the essay should aim for (genre goals) and what would be the expectations to meet (genre criteria), providing the basis for a variety of SR behaviors. Despite its limitations, this investigation responds to calls for context-sensitive inquiries of self-regulation and metacognition, were individual development is highlighted against the backdrop of the social context in which it is embedded (Azevedo 2009; Pieschl, 2009).
学术散文中的学徒制是一种变革性的体验(Hayot,2014),本文利用Rogoff(19902008)参与挪用的理论视角,调查了三位学士(BA)文学随笔作家的自我调节发展,试图解释个人如何因,社会互动。学习对具体、可实现的写作目标进行自我调节的学生可以获得更高水平的写作表现,即文本质量(Rogers&Graham,2008;Graham、McKeown、Kiuhara和Harris,2012;Graham和Perin,2007年)。元认知技能是体裁知识和修辞效果发展的组成部分(Negretti,2015)。因此,我们调查了与导师的互动如何帮助学生定位于与类型/学科相关的写作目标,他们如何对这些目标进行自我调节,以及如何帮助学生与利益相关者(考官)对写作质量的评估保持一致。数据是通过在学期中的三个时间点进行深入、定性的访谈收集的;答辩后还从考官那里收集了面试数据。使用Pintrich(2004)的启发式方法,在NVivo中对数据进行编码和分析。结果显示,学生们经常明确地报告或想象与导师的互动:一种“对话式的大声思考”。这些对话经常讨论与体裁相关的方面,如文章应该达到什么目的(体裁目标)和期望达到什么目的的期望(体裁标准),为各种SR行为提供了基础。尽管存在局限性,但这项调查回应了对自我调节和元认知的情境敏感调查的呼吁,因为个体发展是在其所处的社会背景下强调的(Azevedo,2009;Pieschl,2009)。
{"title":"Participatory appropriation as a pathway to self-regulation in academic writing: The case of three BA essay writers in literature","authors":"Raffaella Negretti, Špela Mežek","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.01","url":null,"abstract":"Apprenticeship in academic prose is a transformative experience (Hayot, 2014), and this paper investigates the development of self-regulation in three bachelor (BA) literature essay writers using the theoretical lens of participatory appropriation by Rogoff (1990, 2008), which seeks to explain how individuals undergo processes of development thanks to, and in interaction with, the social interaction. Students who learn to self-regulate towards concrete, achievable writing goals obtain higher levels of writing performance, i.e. text quality (Rogers & Graham, 2008; Graham, McKeown, Kiuhara & Harris, 2012; Graham & Perin, 2007). Metacognitive skills are integral to the development of genre knowledge and rhetorical effectiveness (Negretti, 2015). We thus investigate how interaction with a supervisor helps students orient themselves towards genre/discipline-relevant writing goals, how do they self-regulate towards these goals, how it helps students aligning with the stakeholders’ (the examiners) evaluation of the quality of writing. Data was collected through in-depth, qualitative interviews at three points in the term; interview data was also collected from the examiners after defense. Data was coded and analyzed in NVivo, using Pintrich’s (2004) heuristic. Results show that frequently students explicitly reported on or imagined the interaction with their supervisor: a sort of “dialogic think-aloud”. These dialogues often discussed genre-relevant aspects such as what the essay should aim for (genre goals) and what would be the expectations to meet (genre criteria), providing the basis for a variety of SR behaviors. Despite its limitations, this investigation responds to calls for context-sensitive inquiries of self-regulation and metacognition, were individual development is highlighted against the backdrop of the social context in which it is embedded (Azevedo 2009; Pieschl, 2009).","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.01","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45287597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
A Critical Review of the Logics of Inquiry in Studies of Early Writing Development 早期写作发展研究中的探究逻辑述评
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.02
S. Harmey, I. Wilkinson
Comprehensive descriptions of early writing development are needed to adequately inform instruction and intervention and yet knowledge about how early writing develops is fragmented. This paper provides a critical review of longitudinal studies of early writing development with specific attention to the logics of inquiry used. Twenty-seven studies of children up to age 10, spanning 34 years from 5 countries, are included. Researchers’ theoretical framing, research questions, definitions of writing, study designs, time span, analytic procedures, measurement or classification of writing, key findings, and attention to context or instruction are examined. Findings show that definitions of writing vary considerably or, in some instances, are nonexistent. These definitions have implications for the research designs and measures used, and how data were classified. Many studies describe developmental trends in a global way but few describe how the development occurs or goes awry. Few studies examine cognition in conjunction with context. Similarly, few studies present strong theoretical orientations toward writing with coherent connections between problem formulation and design, measures, or classifications used. Recommendations for future research are provided.
需要对早期写作发展进行全面描述,以充分告知指导和干预,但关于早期写作如何发展的知识是零散的。本文对早期写作发展的纵向研究进行了批判性的回顾,特别关注所使用的探究逻辑。包括来自5个国家的27项针对10岁以下儿童的研究,涉及34岁。研究人员的理论框架、研究问题、写作定义、研究设计、时间跨度、分析程序、写作的测量或分类、关键发现以及对上下文或教学的关注都会受到检查。研究结果表明,写作的定义差异很大,或者在某些情况下根本不存在。这些定义对所使用的研究设计和措施以及数据的分类方式都有影响。许多研究以全球的方式描述发展趋势,但很少有研究描述发展是如何发生或出错的。很少有研究将认知与语境结合起来研究。同样,很少有研究在写作方面提出强有力的理论方向,在问题的制定和使用的设计、测量或分类之间建立连贯的联系。对未来的研究提出了建议。
{"title":"A Critical Review of the Logics of Inquiry in Studies of Early Writing Development","authors":"S. Harmey, I. Wilkinson","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.02","url":null,"abstract":"Comprehensive descriptions of early writing development are needed to adequately inform instruction and intervention and yet knowledge about how early writing develops is fragmented. This paper provides a critical review of longitudinal studies of early writing development with specific attention to the logics of inquiry used. Twenty-seven studies of children up to age 10, spanning 34 years from 5 countries, are included. Researchers’ theoretical framing, research questions, definitions of writing, study designs, time span, analytic procedures, measurement or classification of writing, key findings, and attention to context or instruction are examined. Findings show that definitions of writing vary considerably or, in some instances, are nonexistent. These definitions have implications for the research designs and measures used, and how data were classified. Many studies describe developmental trends in a global way but few describe how the development occurs or goes awry. Few studies examine cognition in conjunction with context. Similarly, few studies present strong theoretical orientations toward writing with coherent connections between problem formulation and design, measures, or classifications used. Recommendations for future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.02","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43610907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Soaring to Successful Synthesis Writing 迈向成功的综合写作
IF 4.1 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.06
Linlin Luo, Kenneth A. Kiewra
{"title":"Soaring to Successful Synthesis Writing","authors":"Linlin Luo, Kenneth A. Kiewra","doi":"10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17239/JOWR-2019.11.01.06","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45462252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
期刊
Journal of Writing Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1