{"title":"Supplemental Material for Parenting Amidst COVID-19: Pandemic-Related Stressors, Inequities, and Treatment Utilization and Perceptions","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000189.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000189.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"22 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82921489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Hooghe, Anje Claeys, B. Thompson, R. Neimeyer, P. Rober
Given the massive influences of COVID-19 restrictions on people in nearly all nations, we conducted an in-depth qualitative study of 15 Belgian parents who had lost a child prior to the pandemic in order to understand its impact on their ongoing bereavement. Analysis of focus group sessions and couples interviews distinguished between experiences related to the pandemic and those related to resulting governmental restrictions (e.g., lockdown, social distancing). We theoretically framed our findings in terms of the dual processes of orienting to loss versus restoring life, reconstructing meaning in bereavement, and relationally attuning as a couple to a shared loss. We found that the COVID period accentuated all losses, awakening the parents' grief for their own loss and their empathy for others. At the same time, they experienced limited opportunities for restoration-oriented distraction through connection with familiar activities and relationships beyond the family. Control or choice in this process of oscillation between orienting to grief versus ongoing life was impaired by the pandemic, as parents struggled to find a new dynamic balance to compensate for the risk of continuous engagement with reminders of their loss. Most notable was their close proximity as a couple, while being at a greater distance from the social network. The continuous attunement process between partners and family members played out in a process of drawing close and interposing distance, of grieving apart and together, of talking about grief and holding silence. We close by reflecting on the implications of our findings for clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
{"title":"Grieving the loss of a child in times of COVID-19.","authors":"A. Hooghe, Anje Claeys, B. Thompson, R. Neimeyer, P. Rober","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000180","url":null,"abstract":"Given the massive influences of COVID-19 restrictions on people in nearly all nations, we conducted an in-depth qualitative study of 15 Belgian parents who had lost a child prior to the pandemic in order to understand its impact on their ongoing bereavement. Analysis of focus group sessions and couples interviews distinguished between experiences related to the pandemic and those related to resulting governmental restrictions (e.g., lockdown, social distancing). We theoretically framed our findings in terms of the dual processes of orienting to loss versus restoring life, reconstructing meaning in bereavement, and relationally attuning as a couple to a shared loss. We found that the COVID period accentuated all losses, awakening the parents' grief for their own loss and their empathy for others. At the same time, they experienced limited opportunities for restoration-oriented distraction through connection with familiar activities and relationships beyond the family. Control or choice in this process of oscillation between orienting to grief versus ongoing life was impaired by the pandemic, as parents struggled to find a new dynamic balance to compensate for the risk of continuous engagement with reminders of their loss. Most notable was their close proximity as a couple, while being at a greater distance from the social network. The continuous attunement process between partners and family members played out in a process of drawing close and interposing distance, of grieving apart and together, of talking about grief and holding silence. We close by reflecting on the implications of our findings for clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78815481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shelby B. Scott, Aleja M. Parsons, Quyen A. Do, Kayla C Knopp, Galena K. Rhoades
{"title":"Actor-partner effects of sexual minority stress on relationship quality in female same-gender couples.","authors":"Shelby B. Scott, Aleja M. Parsons, Quyen A. Do, Kayla C Knopp, Galena K. Rhoades","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73498121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marshina Juliza Mohd Hasim, N. Hashim, Hasrina Mustafa
{"title":"Married life: Measuring adult romantic attachment and satisfaction.","authors":"Marshina Juliza Mohd Hasim, N. Hashim, Hasrina Mustafa","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82021367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Parent support for same-sex relationships: Considerations for clinical work and intervention research.","authors":"Joshua A. Goodman","doi":"10.1037/CFP0000190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CFP0000190","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75370824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Kenny, Elizabeth S Allen, Keith D. Renshaw, Arjun Bhalla, S. Fredman
{"title":"Two perspectives on accommodation of PTSD symptoms: Partners versus service members.","authors":"Jessica Kenny, Elizabeth S Allen, Keith D. Renshaw, Arjun Bhalla, S. Fredman","doi":"10.1037/CFP0000184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CFP0000184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90317109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Schokkenbroek, Wim Hardyns, Sarah Anrijs, Koen Ponnet
The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically affected people's lives and relationships. On March 13, 2020, the Belgian government issued lockdown measures which constrained most people's work and social life to the confines of their own home. For couples who lived together, being locked down together potentially placed a lot of stress on their relationship. As relationship stress can have detrimental (mental) health outcomes, it is important to identify which relationship aspects were particularly stressful during the pandemic lockdown. The present study aimed to investigate whether perceived relationship stress about five specific relationship aspects (i.e., conflict, diverging attitudes, restrictions, less connectedness, and neglect) differed before and during the lockdown, and between men and women. We conducted an online survey study among 2,889 respondents between April 3 and 17, 2020. A total of 1,491 respondents (76.3% female, Mage = 41.23) lived together full-time with their partner at the time. Our findings indicate that during the lockdown, women experienced more relationship stress than men because of conflict and diverging attitudes within their relationship. Furthermore, both men and women experienced more stress during the lockdown than before because they felt restricted in their relationship. Lastly, women reported significantly more perceived relationship stress during the pandemic lockdown compared to before because of conflicts they experienced within their relationship. Our findings provide important information for policymakers and health-care professionals to help couples who endure relationship hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown or in possibly similar situations in future crises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
{"title":"Partners in lockdown: Relationship stress in men and women during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"J. Schokkenbroek, Wim Hardyns, Sarah Anrijs, Koen Ponnet","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000172","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically affected people's lives and relationships. On March 13, 2020, the Belgian government issued lockdown measures which constrained most people's work and social life to the confines of their own home. For couples who lived together, being locked down together potentially placed a lot of stress on their relationship. As relationship stress can have detrimental (mental) health outcomes, it is important to identify which relationship aspects were particularly stressful during the pandemic lockdown. The present study aimed to investigate whether perceived relationship stress about five specific relationship aspects (i.e., conflict, diverging attitudes, restrictions, less connectedness, and neglect) differed before and during the lockdown, and between men and women. We conducted an online survey study among 2,889 respondents between April 3 and 17, 2020. A total of 1,491 respondents (76.3% female, Mage = 41.23) lived together full-time with their partner at the time. Our findings indicate that during the lockdown, women experienced more relationship stress than men because of conflict and diverging attitudes within their relationship. Furthermore, both men and women experienced more stress during the lockdown than before because they felt restricted in their relationship. Lastly, women reported significantly more perceived relationship stress during the pandemic lockdown compared to before because of conflicts they experienced within their relationship. Our findings provide important information for policymakers and health-care professionals to help couples who endure relationship hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown or in possibly similar situations in future crises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85061472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Relationship maintenance behaviors, resilience, and relational quality in romantic relationships of LGBTQ+ people.","authors":"S. Haas, Pamela J. Lannutti","doi":"10.1037/CFP0000186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CFP0000186","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"451 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82971982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Caillot-Ranjeva, H. Amièva, Samuel Gourlain, V. Bergua
{"title":"Mental health similarities and interdependence between healthy elderly spouses: A systematic review and research directions.","authors":"S. Caillot-Ranjeva, H. Amièva, Samuel Gourlain, V. Bergua","doi":"10.1037/CFP0000144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CFP0000144","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72994584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samuel B. Rennebohm, M. Dolezal, Jacob A. Bentley, Amanda Edwards-Stewart, John W. Thoburn, Jeff Holguin
{"title":"The moderating effect of coping behaviors on posttraumatic stress and first responder romantic relationships.","authors":"Samuel B. Rennebohm, M. Dolezal, Jacob A. Bentley, Amanda Edwards-Stewart, John W. Thoburn, Jeff Holguin","doi":"10.1037/CFP0000165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CFP0000165","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79177617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：