Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice最新文献_第9页

Religiosity and relationship quality in dating relationships. 恋爱关系中的宗教信仰和关系质量。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000177

Hannah Koch Aragoni, S. Stanley, Shelly Smith-Acuña, Galena K. Rhoades

引用次数: 1

Families in confinement: A pre–post COVID-19 study. 禁闭家庭:一项COVID-19前后的研究

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000179

M. Gagné, Gene L. Piché, Marie-Ève Clément, Aude Villatte

The appearance of COVID-19 and consequent containment measures, including the closure of schools and daycare services (decreed on March 13, 2020, in Quebec, Canada), has hit families hard. Overnight, parents had to reconcile their professional activities, including teleworking, with the need to keep or even educate their children at home. Others found themselves unemployed, leading to increased financial stress. Children and adolescents were suddenly deprived of their usual activities and social contacts. All of this experienced in a potentially stressful atmosphere (e.g., fear of contamination) and in a context where access to the social support network and psychosocial services was considerably reduced. Several experts have expressed concerns about this situation (Cluver et al., 2020;Witt et al., 2020), fearing that it could push some families into the zone of psychosocial risk and psychological distress (Berube et al., 2020;Lawson et al., 2020). Indeed, social adversity can negatively affect children’s and parents’ adjustment, due to the pressure it exerts on family processes (Repetti et al., 2002). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

2019冠状病毒病的出现以及随之而来的遏制措施，包括关闭学校和日托服务(2020年3月13日在加拿大魁北克省颁布)，给家庭带来了沉重打击。一夜之间，父母们不得不在他们的职业活动(包括远程办公)与让孩子留在家里甚至教育孩子的需要之间进行协调。其他人发现自己失业了，导致经济压力增加。儿童和青少年突然被剥夺了正常的活动和社会交往。所有这些都是在潜在的紧张气氛中(例如，害怕污染)以及在获得社会支持网络和心理社会服务的机会大大减少的情况下发生的。一些专家对这种情况表示担忧(Cluver et al.， 2020;Witt et al.， 2020)，担心这会将一些家庭推向社会心理风险和心理困扰区(Berube et al.， 2020;Lawson et al.， 2020)。事实上，由于社会逆境对家庭过程施加的压力，它会对儿童和父母的适应产生负面影响(Repetti et al.， 2002)。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"Families in confinement: A pre–post COVID-19 study.","authors":"M. Gagné, Gene L. Piché, Marie-Ève Clément, Aude Villatte","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000179","url":null,"abstract":"The appearance of COVID-19 and consequent containment measures, including the closure of schools and daycare services (decreed on March 13, 2020, in Quebec, Canada), has hit families hard. Overnight, parents had to reconcile their professional activities, including teleworking, with the need to keep or even educate their children at home. Others found themselves unemployed, leading to increased financial stress. Children and adolescents were suddenly deprived of their usual activities and social contacts. All of this experienced in a potentially stressful atmosphere (e.g., fear of contamination) and in a context where access to the social support network and psychosocial services was considerably reduced. Several experts have expressed concerns about this situation (Cluver et al., 2020;Witt et al., 2020), fearing that it could push some families into the zone of psychosocial risk and psychological distress (Berube et al., 2020;Lawson et al., 2020). Indeed, social adversity can negatively affect children’s and parents’ adjustment, due to the pressure it exerts on family processes (Repetti et al., 2002). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88432529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18

A roadmap for patient- and family-centered care during the pandemic. 大流行期间以患者和家庭为中心的护理路线图。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000176

N. Kaslow, Sarah E. Dunn, Joanna M. Bonsall, Elsa Mekonnen, J. Newsome, A. Pendley, Marsha Wierson, Ann C. Schwartz

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected profoundly all parties and health-care delivery. Most hospitalized patients find that separation from loved ones takes a toll on them and the safety measures instituted come at a huge cost to their physical and emotional well-being. Family members are distressed and traumatized because they are unable to support or advocate for their loved ones and feel disconnected from the health-care team. Health-care professionals (HCPs) experience psychological and moral distress because the absence of families negatively affects their ability to provide quality, compassionate, and timely care. As a result, there have been calls for revisions of policies and procedures to reprioritize patient- and family-centered care (PFCC). Building upon their experience as frontline HCPs, health-care team leaders, and patients and family members who are also frontline HCPs, the interprofessional team (psychologists, psychiatrists, hospitalists, nurses, and specialists) of co-authors reviewed the literature and developed collegial consensus on a roadmap for PFCC during the pandemic that includes guiding principles along with associated best practices and implementation strategies for their operationalization. The guiding principles focus on providing safe yet compassionate and ethical PFCC;balancing community health and the mitigation of viral transmission with appreciating family members as essential partners in care;fostering communication between patients and their families;and promoting interactions and decision-making among HCPs, patients, and families. We hope this roadmap facilitates the transformation of the health-care culture during the pandemic to one that is truly patient and family centered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

2019冠状病毒病大流行深刻影响了各方和卫生保健服务。大多数住院病人发现，与亲人的分离对他们造成了伤害，制定的安全措施对他们的身心健康造成了巨大的损失。家庭成员感到痛苦和创伤，因为他们无法支持或倡导他们的亲人，并感到与保健团队脱节。卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)经历心理和道德上的痛苦，因为没有家庭对他们提供高质量、富有同情心和及时护理的能力产生负面影响。因此，有人呼吁修订政策和程序，重新确定以患者和家庭为中心的护理(PFCC)的优先级。基于他们作为一线医护人员、卫生保健团队领导以及作为一线医护人员的患者和家属的经验，共同作者的跨专业团队(心理学家、精神科医生、医院医生、护士和专家)审查了文献，并就大流行期间PFCC的路线图达成了学院共识，其中包括指导原则以及相关的最佳实践和实施策略。指导原则的重点是提供安全、富有同情心和合乎道德的PFCC;平衡社区卫生和减轻病毒传播，同时重视家庭成员作为护理的重要伙伴;促进患者及其家庭之间的沟通;促进医务人员、患者和家庭之间的互动和决策。我们希望这一路线图有助于在大流行期间将保健文化转变为真正以病人和家庭为中心的文化。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"A roadmap for patient- and family-centered care during the pandemic.","authors":"N. Kaslow, Sarah E. Dunn, Joanna M. Bonsall, Elsa Mekonnen, J. Newsome, A. Pendley, Marsha Wierson, Ann C. Schwartz","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000176","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has affected profoundly all parties and health-care delivery. Most hospitalized patients find that separation from loved ones takes a toll on them and the safety measures instituted come at a huge cost to their physical and emotional well-being. Family members are distressed and traumatized because they are unable to support or advocate for their loved ones and feel disconnected from the health-care team. Health-care professionals (HCPs) experience psychological and moral distress because the absence of families negatively affects their ability to provide quality, compassionate, and timely care. As a result, there have been calls for revisions of policies and procedures to reprioritize patient- and family-centered care (PFCC). Building upon their experience as frontline HCPs, health-care team leaders, and patients and family members who are also frontline HCPs, the interprofessional team (psychologists, psychiatrists, hospitalists, nurses, and specialists) of co-authors reviewed the literature and developed collegial consensus on a roadmap for PFCC during the pandemic that includes guiding principles along with associated best practices and implementation strategies for their operationalization. The guiding principles focus on providing safe yet compassionate and ethical PFCC;balancing community health and the mitigation of viral transmission with appreciating family members as essential partners in care;fostering communication between patients and their families;and promoting interactions and decision-making among HCPs, patients, and families. We hope this roadmap facilitates the transformation of the health-care culture during the pandemic to one that is truly patient and family centered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77248078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Childhood trauma as a predictor of change in couple and family therapy: A study of treatment response. 童年创伤作为夫妻和家庭治疗变化的预测因子:治疗反应的研究。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000181

Kristoffer J. Whittaker, S. U. Johnson, Ole André Solbakken, B. Wampold, T. Tilden

引用次数: 2

Demographic characteristics, mental health conditions, and psychotherapy use of veterans in couples and family therapy. 退伍军人的人口特征、心理健康状况和心理治疗在夫妻和家庭治疗中的应用。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000185

G. McKee, S. McDonald, A. Karmarkar, M. P. Ghatas

引用次数: 1

Should I stay or should I go? Evaluating intimate relationship outcomes during the 2020 pandemic shutdown. 我该留下还是走?评估2020年大流行关闭期间的亲密关系结果。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000169

C. Fleming, Alexis T. Franzese

Past research suggests that intimate partners respond to major stressors in different ways, sometimes by sticking together and sometimes by splitting up. Couples living through the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States are facing a unique set of stressors and are likely to experience changes in relationship outcomes as a result. The vulnerability–stress–adaptation (VSA) model suggests that relationship stability and relationship satisfaction are related to demographic variables, individual vulnerabilities (i.e., mental health), external stressors (i.e., finances), and relationship processes (i.e., communication patterns). The current study evaluates each of these variables as potential predictors of relationship satisfaction and thoughts of separating from a relationship, with the goal of identifying risk factors for relationship outcomes in the pandemic. A total of 782 adults with cohabitating intimate partners (89.8% White, 84.5% female) were recruited for an online study during the COVID-19 shutdown phase from April 3 through May 22, 2020. Results suggested that higher relationship satisfaction during the shutdown was related to not having children in the home, lower money stress, higher sexual fulfillment, lower relationship invalidation, and higher perceived fairness of relationship power. Higher thoughts of separation were related to younger age, higher verbal aggression, higher relationship invalidation, and lower relationship satisfaction. Overall, findings support the use of the VSA as a model for understanding the effect of pandemic stress on relationships and indicate that relationships are being affected by many aspects of the pandemic. Couples’ support interventions will need to be adapted to adequately promote relationship health in this difficult time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

过去的研究表明，亲密伴侣对主要压力源的反应方式不同，有时会在一起，有时会分手。在美国，经历了COVID-19大流行的夫妇正面临着一系列独特的压力源，因此可能会经历关系结果的变化。脆弱性-压力-适应(VSA)模型表明，关系稳定性和关系满意度与人口统计学变量、个体脆弱性(如心理健康)、外部压力源(如财务状况)和关系过程(如沟通模式)有关。目前的研究评估了这些变量中的每一个，作为关系满意度和与关系分离的想法的潜在预测因素，目的是确定大流行中关系结果的风险因素。在2020年4月3日至5月22日的COVID-19关闭阶段，共有782名有同居亲密伴侣的成年人(89.8%为白人，84.5%为女性)被招募参加在线研究。结果表明，在停工期间，较高的关系满意度与家中没有孩子、较低的金钱压力、较高的性满足感、较低的关系无效以及较高的关系权力公平感有关。较高的分离想法与年龄、较高的言语攻击、较高的关系无效和较低的关系满意度有关。总体而言，调查结果支持使用VSA作为理解大流行压力对关系影响的模型，并表明关系正在受到大流行的许多方面的影响。在这个困难时期，夫妻的支持干预需要调整，以充分促进关系的健康。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"Should I stay or should I go? Evaluating intimate relationship outcomes during the 2020 pandemic shutdown.","authors":"C. Fleming, Alexis T. Franzese","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000169","url":null,"abstract":"Past research suggests that intimate partners respond to major stressors in different ways, sometimes by sticking together and sometimes by splitting up. Couples living through the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States are facing a unique set of stressors and are likely to experience changes in relationship outcomes as a result. The vulnerability–stress–adaptation (VSA) model suggests that relationship stability and relationship satisfaction are related to demographic variables, individual vulnerabilities (i.e., mental health), external stressors (i.e., finances), and relationship processes (i.e., communication patterns). The current study evaluates each of these variables as potential predictors of relationship satisfaction and thoughts of separating from a relationship, with the goal of identifying risk factors for relationship outcomes in the pandemic. A total of 782 adults with cohabitating intimate partners (89.8% White, 84.5% female) were recruited for an online study during the COVID-19 shutdown phase from April 3 through May 22, 2020. Results suggested that higher relationship satisfaction during the shutdown was related to not having children in the home, lower money stress, higher sexual fulfillment, lower relationship invalidation, and higher perceived fairness of relationship power. Higher thoughts of separation were related to younger age, higher verbal aggression, higher relationship invalidation, and lower relationship satisfaction. Overall, findings support the use of the VSA as a model for understanding the effect of pandemic stress on relationships and indicate that relationships are being affected by many aspects of the pandemic. Couples’ support interventions will need to be adapted to adequately promote relationship health in this difficult time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73896307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Pregnant women’s experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method exploration of prenatal depression. 新冠肺炎大流行期间孕妇的经历:产前抑郁的混合方法探索

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000178

Amy M. Claridge, Tishra Beeson, Amie Wojtyna, Jill C. Hoxmeier

Risk factors associated with prenatal depression have been studied extensively, but it is unclear whether typical risks are relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. This mixed-method study involved surveys and interviews with women in their third trimester of pregnancy to understand prevalence and correlates of prenatal depression during a pandemic event. Survey participants included 378 pregnant women in the United States with due dates between April and December 2020 who self-reported depressive symptoms using the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Participants were predominately white, married, and highly educated. A subset of 21 women participated in qualitative interviews. In total, 56.3% of women reported depressive symptoms consistent with clinical levels of prenatal depression. Correlates of depressive symptoms included younger age, unmarried status, lack of access to paid parental leave, feeling unsafe in current romantic relationship, fear and worry about upcoming childbirth, and change in birth plans due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In-depth interviews with participants revealed key themes around pregnant women’s experiences with fear and anxiety, mixed emotions, and grief and loss. These findings underscore the pervasive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women during the perinatal period, with specific implications for the care of women with prenatal depression and their families. The heightened potential for prenatal depression in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is concerning given the potential adverse effects of maternal depression. Practitioners must work together to engage in additional assessment of risks of prenatal depression to ensure support for expecting families is readily accessible. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

与产前抑郁相关的风险因素已被广泛研究，但目前尚不清楚在COVID-19大流行期间典型风险是否相关。这项混合方法研究包括对怀孕晚期的妇女进行调查和访谈，以了解大流行期间产前抑郁的患病率及其相关性。调查参与者包括378名预产期在2020年4月至12月之间的美国孕妇，她们使用10项爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)自我报告抑郁症状。参与者主要是白人，已婚，受过高等教育。有21名妇女参加了定性访谈。总体而言，56.3%的妇女报告的抑郁症状与产前抑郁的临床水平一致。与抑郁症状相关的因素包括年龄较小、未婚、无法获得带薪育儿假、对目前的恋爱关系感到不安全、对即将分娩的恐惧和担忧，以及因COVID-19大流行而改变生育计划。对参与者的深入访谈揭示了孕妇恐惧和焦虑、复杂情绪、悲伤和失落等经历的关键主题。这些发现强调了COVID-19大流行对围产期妇女的普遍影响，对产前抑郁症妇女及其家人的护理具有特殊意义。鉴于产妇抑郁症的潜在不利影响，在COVID-19大流行的背景下，产前抑郁症的可能性增加令人担忧。从业人员必须共同努力，参与产前抑郁风险的额外评估，以确保对预期家庭的支持是容易获得的。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"Pregnant women’s experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method exploration of prenatal depression.","authors":"Amy M. Claridge, Tishra Beeson, Amie Wojtyna, Jill C. Hoxmeier","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000178","url":null,"abstract":"Risk factors associated with prenatal depression have been studied extensively, but it is unclear whether typical risks are relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. This mixed-method study involved surveys and interviews with women in their third trimester of pregnancy to understand prevalence and correlates of prenatal depression during a pandemic event. Survey participants included 378 pregnant women in the United States with due dates between April and December 2020 who self-reported depressive symptoms using the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Participants were predominately white, married, and highly educated. A subset of 21 women participated in qualitative interviews. In total, 56.3% of women reported depressive symptoms consistent with clinical levels of prenatal depression. Correlates of depressive symptoms included younger age, unmarried status, lack of access to paid parental leave, feeling unsafe in current romantic relationship, fear and worry about upcoming childbirth, and change in birth plans due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In-depth interviews with participants revealed key themes around pregnant women’s experiences with fear and anxiety, mixed emotions, and grief and loss. These findings underscore the pervasive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women during the perinatal period, with specific implications for the care of women with prenatal depression and their families. The heightened potential for prenatal depression in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is concerning given the potential adverse effects of maternal depression. Practitioners must work together to engage in additional assessment of risks of prenatal depression to ensure support for expecting families is readily accessible. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79320930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Did perceived parenting in adolescence change as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown? A natural experiment. 青少年的育儿观念是否因COVID-19封锁而改变?一个自然实验。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000167

M. Bacikova-Sleskova, Lucia Barbierik, A. Janovská, O. Kalina, O. Orosová

The first COVID-19 lockdown was an unexpected event that brought many changes to the lives of individuals as well as family functioning. The aim of this natural experiment is to study the changes in maternal parenting as perceived by adolescents (psychological control, autonomy support, and overcontrol) as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown. The data for T1 were collected in February 2020 and a follow-up was conducted in May 2020 (approximately 8 weeks after lockdown). In total, 155 adolescents participated in both waves (mean age 14.5 years, 60.4% girls). The final sample was biased toward higher achieving pupils with less problematic behavior and more adaptable personality characteristics. The results show a significant decrease in perceived psychological control and feelings of overcontrol but no change in autonomy support. The changes did not vary according to gender or the mother’s employment situation during lockdown. The decrease in psychological control was greater with higher initial levels of satisfaction with the mother and lower levels of disobeying parents. The present study is an important step in understanding the actual changes in parenting (as perceived by adolescents) as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown. Based on our results and previous studies, we argue that the COVID-19 lockdown may have had a positive effect on the dynamics in some families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

第一次COVID-19封锁是一个意外事件，给个人生活和家庭功能带来了许多变化。这个自然实验的目的是研究青少年在COVID-19封锁后感受到的母亲养育方式的变化(心理控制、自主支持和过度控制)。T1的数据于2020年2月收集，并于2020年5月(封城后约8周)进行了随访。总共有155名青少年参加了这两波(平均年龄14.5岁，60.4%是女孩)。最后的样本偏向于成绩较高的学生，他们的问题行为较少，个性特征更强。结果显示，心理控制感和过度控制感明显下降，但自主支持没有变化。这些变化没有因性别或母亲在封锁期间的就业情况而有所不同。对母亲的初始满意度越高，对父母的不服从程度越低，心理控制能力的下降幅度越大。目前的研究是了解新冠肺炎封锁导致的育儿(青少年所感知的)实际变化的重要一步。根据我们的研究结果和以前的研究，我们认为COVID-19封锁可能对一些家庭的动态产生了积极影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"Did perceived parenting in adolescence change as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown? A natural experiment.","authors":"M. Bacikova-Sleskova, Lucia Barbierik, A. Janovská, O. Kalina, O. Orosová","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000167","url":null,"abstract":"The first COVID-19 lockdown was an unexpected event that brought many changes to the lives of individuals as well as family functioning. The aim of this natural experiment is to study the changes in maternal parenting as perceived by adolescents (psychological control, autonomy support, and overcontrol) as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown. The data for T1 were collected in February 2020 and a follow-up was conducted in May 2020 (approximately 8 weeks after lockdown). In total, 155 adolescents participated in both waves (mean age 14.5 years, 60.4% girls). The final sample was biased toward higher achieving pupils with less problematic behavior and more adaptable personality characteristics. The results show a significant decrease in perceived psychological control and feelings of overcontrol but no change in autonomy support. The changes did not vary according to gender or the mother’s employment situation during lockdown. The decrease in psychological control was greater with higher initial levels of satisfaction with the mother and lower levels of disobeying parents. The present study is an important step in understanding the actual changes in parenting (as perceived by adolescents) as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown. Based on our results and previous studies, we argue that the COVID-19 lockdown may have had a positive effect on the dynamics in some families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81599266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Clinically significant depression among parents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the protective role of family relationships. COVID-19大流行期间父母临床显著抑郁:检验家庭关系的保护作用

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000175

B. Russell, R. Tambling, A. Horton, M. Hutchison, A. Tomkunas

Responding to families at heightened risk for mental health burdens during the COVID-19 pandemic is critical—evidence suggests parents face elevated burdens compared to their nonparent counterparts. Building on studies that demonstrate a spillover of stress across domains and individuals within families, this study examines longitudinal predictors of elevated risks for clinical depression among parents based on relational family indicators, COVID-specific stressors, and stress and emotion regulation indicators. Baseline data were collected from parents (n = 176;average age 37.04, 50% female) on April 27–28, 2020, 5 weeks after the first U.S. quarantines began. Follow-up data were collected 30 days later. Results indicated concerning levels of parents’ mental health symptoms over this short time span, including elevated stressors and exacerbated mental health symptoms for approximately one-quarter of parents. Given the need for agile service responses for those at the greatest risk, this article examines predictions of clinically significant depression through binary logistic regression. These individuals were more likely to report greater anxiety and stress symptoms, as well as report less closeness in their parent–child relationships;couple satisfaction was not a significant predictor of depression. Implications include recommended agile responses to alleviate distress and expand access to mental health supports, particularly in light of pervasive shelter-in place orders that limit access to previously established coping supports and sources of social connection (e.g., schools or community centers), that are anticipated to recur in the months ahead. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间，应对心理健康负担风险增加的家庭至关重要——有证据表明，与非父母相比，父母面临的负担更高。本研究以证明压力在家庭中跨领域和跨个体溢出的研究为基础，根据相关家庭指标、特定于covid - 19的压力源以及压力和情绪调节指标，研究了父母临床抑郁风险升高的纵向预测因素。基线数据收集于2020年4月27日至28日，即美国首次隔离开始5周后，从父母(n = 176;平均年龄37.04,50%为女性)处收集。30天后收集随访数据。结果表明，在这么短的时间内，父母的心理健康症状水平有关，包括大约四分之一的父母的压力源升高和心理健康症状加剧。考虑到那些处于最大风险的人需要敏捷的服务响应，本文通过二元逻辑回归检查临床显著抑郁症的预测。这些人更有可能报告更大的焦虑和压力症状，以及亲子关系的亲密程度较低;夫妻满意度不是抑郁症的重要预测因子。影响包括建议采取灵活的应对措施，以减轻痛苦和扩大获得心理健康支持的机会，特别是鉴于普遍存在的就地安置令限制了获得先前建立的应对支持和社会联系来源(例如学校或社区中心)的机会，预计未来几个月将再次出现这种情况。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"Clinically significant depression among parents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the protective role of family relationships.","authors":"B. Russell, R. Tambling, A. Horton, M. Hutchison, A. Tomkunas","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000175","url":null,"abstract":"Responding to families at heightened risk for mental health burdens during the COVID-19 pandemic is critical—evidence suggests parents face elevated burdens compared to their nonparent counterparts. Building on studies that demonstrate a spillover of stress across domains and individuals within families, this study examines longitudinal predictors of elevated risks for clinical depression among parents based on relational family indicators, COVID-specific stressors, and stress and emotion regulation indicators. Baseline data were collected from parents (n = 176;average age 37.04, 50% female) on April 27–28, 2020, 5 weeks after the first U.S. quarantines began. Follow-up data were collected 30 days later. Results indicated concerning levels of parents’ mental health symptoms over this short time span, including elevated stressors and exacerbated mental health symptoms for approximately one-quarter of parents. Given the need for agile service responses for those at the greatest risk, this article examines predictions of clinically significant depression through binary logistic regression. These individuals were more likely to report greater anxiety and stress symptoms, as well as report less closeness in their parent–child relationships;couple satisfaction was not a significant predictor of depression. Implications include recommended agile responses to alleviate distress and expand access to mental health supports, particularly in light of pervasive shelter-in place orders that limit access to previously established coping supports and sources of social connection (e.g., schools or community centers), that are anticipated to recur in the months ahead. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85164172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

Effects of a brief web-based interpersonal conflict cognitive reappraisal expressive-writing intervention on changes in romantic conflict during COVID-19 quarantine. 基于网络的人际冲突认知重评价表达性写作干预对COVID-19隔离期间浪漫冲突变化的影响

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice

Pub Date : 2021-06-10 DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000173

Lindsey M. Rodriguez, S. Stewart, C. Neighbors

Romantic conflict is known to have escalated during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. This research investigates whether a single-session online writing intervention results in changes in romantic conflict among American adults cohabitating during COVID-19 quarantine (May 2020). Participants (N = 716, 50% female;mean age = 51.8 years) completed a baseline assessment which was followed by a brief (5–8 min) writing task in Qualtrics. Participants were randomized to one of five conditions, where they were asked to write about (a) a conflict with their romantic partner using cognitive reappraisal;(b) a conflict with their romantic partner expressing their deepest thoughts and feelings;(c) a conflict with someone other than their partner using cognitive reappraisal;(d) a conflict with someone other than their partner and a conflict with their partner expressing their deepest thoughts and feelings;or (e) mundane tasks like laundry, house cleaning, or lawn care. In the reappraisal conditions, participants were asked to use this perspective with the target person in the upcoming weeks. Two weeks later, participants were invited to complete a follow-up survey identical to baseline, where they were asked about conflict with their partner during the follow-up period. Results indicated that participants in the romantic partner cognitive reappraisal condition reported fewer disagreements, fewer relationship aggression events, and lower levels of conflict relentlessness with their partner relative to at least one of the control conditions. Results demonstrate preliminary support for a brief, cost-effective, and accessible tool that can help couples mitigate downstream effects of negative interactions during this stressful time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

据悉，在新冠肺炎疫情封锁期间，爱情矛盾进一步升级。本研究调查了单次在线写作干预是否会导致2019冠状病毒病隔离期间(2020年5月)同居的美国成年人的浪漫冲突发生变化。参与者(N = 716, 50%为女性，平均年龄51.8岁)完成了基线评估，随后在质量测试中完成了简短的写作任务(5-8分钟)。参与者被随机分为五种情况，他们被要求写下(a)用认知重评法与恋人发生冲突;(b)用认知重评法与恋人表达内心最深处的想法和感受;(c)用认知重评法与伴侣以外的人发生冲突;(d)与伴侣以外的人发生冲突，与伴侣表达内心最深处的想法和感受;或(e)平凡的任务，比如洗衣服，打扫房子，或打理草坪。在重新评估条件下，参与者被要求在接下来的几周内对目标人物使用这种观点。两周后，参与者被邀请完成一项与基线相同的后续调查，在那里他们被问及在随访期间与伴侣的冲突。结果表明，与至少一种控制条件相比，在浪漫伴侣认知再评估条件下，参与者报告的分歧、关系攻击事件和与伴侣的冲突持续程度较低。研究结果初步支持了一种简单、经济、方便的工具，可以帮助夫妻减轻在这段紧张时期负面互动的下游影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利)©2021美国心理协会

{"title":"Effects of a brief web-based interpersonal conflict cognitive reappraisal expressive-writing intervention on changes in romantic conflict during COVID-19 quarantine.","authors":"Lindsey M. Rodriguez, S. Stewart, C. Neighbors","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000173","url":null,"abstract":"Romantic conflict is known to have escalated during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. This research investigates whether a single-session online writing intervention results in changes in romantic conflict among American adults cohabitating during COVID-19 quarantine (May 2020). Participants (N = 716, 50% female;mean age = 51.8 years) completed a baseline assessment which was followed by a brief (5–8 min) writing task in Qualtrics. Participants were randomized to one of five conditions, where they were asked to write about (a) a conflict with their romantic partner using cognitive reappraisal;(b) a conflict with their romantic partner expressing their deepest thoughts and feelings;(c) a conflict with someone other than their partner using cognitive reappraisal;(d) a conflict with someone other than their partner and a conflict with their partner expressing their deepest thoughts and feelings;or (e) mundane tasks like laundry, house cleaning, or lawn care. In the reappraisal conditions, participants were asked to use this perspective with the target person in the upcoming weeks. Two weeks later, participants were invited to complete a follow-up survey identical to baseline, where they were asked about conflict with their partner during the follow-up period. Results indicated that participants in the romantic partner cognitive reappraisal condition reported fewer disagreements, fewer relationship aggression events, and lower levels of conflict relentlessness with their partner relative to at least one of the control conditions. Results demonstrate preliminary support for a brief, cost-effective, and accessible tool that can help couples mitigate downstream effects of negative interactions during this stressful time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88255332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10