Parasomnias are due to a transient unstable state dissociation during entry into sleep, within sleep, or during arousal from sleep, and manifest with abnormal sleep related behaviors, perceptions, emotions, dreams, and autonomic nervous system activity.
Rapid eye movement (REM) parasomnias include REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), isolated recurrent sleep paralysis and nightmare disorder. Neurophysiology is key for diagnosing these disorders and provides insights into their pathophysiology.
RBD is very well characterized from a neurophysiological point of view, also thank to the fact that polysomnography is needed for the diagnosis. Diagnostic criteria are provided by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and video-polysomnography guidelines for the diagnosis by the International REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Study Group. Differences between the two sets of criteria are presented and discussed. Availability of polysomnography in RBD provides data on sleep electroencephalography (EEG), electrooculography (EOG) and electromyography (EMG). Sleep EEG in RBD shows e.g. changes in delta and theta power, in sleep spindles and K complexes. EMG during REM sleep is essential for RBD diagnosis and is an important neurodegeneration biomarker. RBD patients present alterations also in wake EEG, autonomic function, evoked potentials, and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Clinical neurophysiological data on recurrent isolated sleep paralysis and nightmare disorder are scant. The few available data provide insights into the pathophysiology of these disorders, demonstrating a state dissociation in recurrent isolated sleep paralysis and suggesting alterations in sleep macro- and microstructure as well as autonomic changes in nightmare disorder.
Nerve conduction studies (NCS) in children remain technically challenging and depend on the cooperation of the child. Motor NCS are not compromised by analgosedation but data for sensory NCS are lacking. Here, we ask whether sensory NCS is influenced by analgosedation. We also compare the present data with NCS studies from the 1990s regarding anthropometric acceleration of the contemporary paediatric population.
Sensory NCS of the median nerve and sural nerve were performed in 182 healthy subjects aged 1 to 18 years during general anaesthesia and in 47 of them without analgosedation.
Sensory NCS was not influenced by midazolam or propofol. The sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude and the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) of the sural nerve as well as the SNAP of the median nerve show no significant age dependence in age range 1–18 years. The sensory NCV of the median nerve increased age-dependent.
In clinical practice, analgosedation can be used for diagnostic NCS. Sensory NCS data show no relevant secular trend over the last 30 years. Differences due to technical inconsistency predominate.
Analgosedation can improve diagnostic quality of sensory NCS in children. Additionally, we provide sensory NCS values from a large pediatric cohort.
Insufficient sleep is linked to several health problems. Previous studies on the effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability using conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) included a limited number of modalities, and few inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) and showed conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability through threshold-tracking TMS, using a wide range of protocols at multiple ISIs.
Fifteen healthy subjects (mean age ± SD: 36 ± 3.34 years) were included. The following tests were performed before and after 24 h of sleep deprivation using semi-automated threshold-tacking TMS protocols: short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) at 11 ISIs between 1 and 30 ms, short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at 14 ISIs between 1 and 4.9 ms, long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) at 6 ISIs between 50 and 300 ms, and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) at 12 ISIs between 16 and 30 ms.
No significant differences were observed between pre- and post-sleep deprivation measurements for SICI, ICF, SICF, or LICI at any ISIs (p < 0.05). As for SAI, we found a difference at 28 ms (p = 0.007) and 30 ms (p = 0.04) but not at other ISIs.
Sleep deprivation does not affect cortical excitability except for SAI.
This study confirms some of the previous studies while contradicting others.
It is generally believed that the decremental response in repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) stabilizes at the fourth or fifth response. We have a preliminary impression that the decremental response approaches a plateau earlier in proximal muscles than in distal muscles. We investigated the speed of the completion of the decremental response in different muscles.
The “decrement completion ratio (DCR)” in the second or third response (DCR2 or DCR3) was defined as the ratio of the decremental percentage of the second or third response to that of the fourth response. Patients showing more than 10% decremental response both in the abductor pollicis (APB) and deltoid muscles were retrospectively extracted from our EMG database. The DCR2 and DCR3 were compared between two muscles in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Identified subjects consisted of 11patients with MG and 11 patients with ALS. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only the difference of muscle influenced on DCR2 and DCR3, with no contribution from the different disorder (MG or ALS) or the initial amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Both DCR2 and DCR3 were significantly higher in deltoid than in APB. In ALS, the normalized CMAP amplitude was not different between APB and deltoid whereas the decremental percentage was significantly higher in deltoid, suggesting a lower safety factor of the neuromuscular transmission in proximal muscles.
The decremental response completed more rapidly in deltoid than in APB which may be related to the lower safety factor also documented by this study.
Unexpected early completion of the decrement such as at the second response in RNS is not a technical error but may be an extreme of the rapid completion in deltoid, a proximal muscle.

