Pub Date : 2022-11-01DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00011-8
Justin Johannesen, Rena Fukuda, David T Zhang, Katherine Tak, Rachel Meier, Hannah Agoglia, Evelyn Horn, Richard B Devereux, Jonathan W Weinsaft, Jiwon Kim
Background: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a known risk factor for right ventricular dysfunction (RVDYS). RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an emerging index of RV function; however, the magnitude of agreement between RV GLS by echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and the relative utility of each modality for both the diagnosis of RVDYS and prognostication of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization remain unknown.
Results: 32% of patients had RVDYS (EF < 50%) on CMR, among whom there was more advanced NYHA class and lower LV and RV ejection fraction (all p < 0.05). RV GLS was impaired in patients with RVDYS whether quantified via STE or FT-CMR, with strong correlation between modalities (r = 0.81). Both STE and FT-CMR derived GLS yielded excellent detection of RVDYS (AUC 0.94 for both), paralleling similar performance for free wall strain by both modalities (FT-CMR AUC 0.94, STE AUC 0.92) with lower accuracy demonstrated by STE derived septal strain (STE AUC 0.78 and FT-CMR AUC 0.92). RV S' and TAPSE showed lower diagnostic accuracy (RV S' AUC 0.77 and TAPSE AUC 0.81). During median follow up of 51 months (IQR 42, 60 months), all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization occurred in 25% (n = 25). Both STE and FT-CMR derived RV GLS stratified risk for adverse prognosis (STE p = 0.007, FT-CMR p = 0.005) whereas conventional RV indices, TAPSE and RV S', did not (TAPSE p = 0.30, S' p = 0.69).
Conclusion: RV GLS is a robust marker of RVDYS irrespective of modality which provides incremental diagnostic value and improves risk stratification for event free survival beyond conventional RV indices.
背景:功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)是右室功能障碍(RVDYS)的已知危险因素。RV全局纵向应变(GLS)是RV函数的一个新兴指标;然而,超声心动图(echo)和心脏磁共振(CMR)的RV GLS之间的一致性程度以及每种模式在诊断RVDYS和预测全因死亡率和心力衰竭住院治疗方面的相对效用仍然未知。结果:32%的患者有RVDYS (EF DYS),无论是通过STE还是FT-CMR量化,两种方式之间有很强的相关性(r = 0.81)。STE和FT-CMR衍生的GLS都能很好地检测RVDYS(两者的AUC均为0.94),两种方法对自由壁应变的检测效果相似(FT-CMR的AUC为0.94,STE的AUC为0.92),STE衍生的间隔应变的准确度较低(STE的AUC为0.78,FT-CMR的AUC为0.92)。RV S'和TAPSE的诊断准确率较低(RV S' AUC为0.77,TAPSE AUC为0.81)。中位随访51个月(IQR为42个月,60个月),全因死亡率或HF住院率为25% (n = 25)。STE和FT-CMR均可得出RV GLS分层不良预后风险(STE p = 0.007, FT-CMR p = 0.005),而传统的RV指标TAPSE和RV S′则不能(TAPSE p = 0.30, S′p = 0.69)。结论:与常规RV指标相比,RVDYS GLS是RVDYS的一个强有力的标志物,提供了增量诊断价值,并改善了无事件生存的风险分层。
{"title":"Direct comparison of echocardiography speckle tracking and cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for quantification of right ventricular strain: a prospective intermodality study in functional mitral regurgitation.","authors":"Justin Johannesen, Rena Fukuda, David T Zhang, Katherine Tak, Rachel Meier, Hannah Agoglia, Evelyn Horn, Richard B Devereux, Jonathan W Weinsaft, Jiwon Kim","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00011-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00011-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a known risk factor for right ventricular dysfunction (RV<sub>DYS</sub>). RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an emerging index of RV function; however, the magnitude of agreement between RV GLS by echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and the relative utility of each modality for both the diagnosis of RV<sub>DYS</sub> and prognostication of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32% of patients had RV<sub>DYS</sub> (EF < 50%) on CMR, among whom there was more advanced NYHA class and lower LV and RV ejection fraction (all p < 0.05). RV GLS was impaired in patients with RV<sub>DYS</sub> whether quantified via STE or FT-CMR, with strong correlation between modalities (r = 0.81). Both STE and FT-CMR derived GLS yielded excellent detection of RV<sub>DYS</sub> (AUC 0.94 for both), paralleling similar performance for free wall strain by both modalities (FT-CMR AUC 0.94, STE AUC 0.92) with lower accuracy demonstrated by STE derived septal strain (STE AUC 0.78 and FT-CMR AUC 0.92). RV S' and TAPSE showed lower diagnostic accuracy (RV S' AUC 0.77 and TAPSE AUC 0.81). During median follow up of 51 months (IQR 42, 60 months), all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization occurred in 25% (n = 25). Both STE and FT-CMR derived RV GLS stratified risk for adverse prognosis (STE p = 0.007, FT-CMR p = 0.005) whereas conventional RV indices, TAPSE and RV S', did not (TAPSE p = 0.30, S' p = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RV GLS is a robust marker of RV<sub>DYS</sub> irrespective of modality which provides incremental diagnostic value and improves risk stratification for event free survival beyond conventional RV indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623949/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40437085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-19DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00010-9
Oliver Graham Slegg, James Alexander Willis, Fiona Wilkinson, Joseph Sparey, Christopher Basil Wild, Jennifer Rossdale, Robert Mackenzie Ross, John D Pauling, Kevin Carson, Sri Raveen Kandan, David Oxborough, Daniel Knight, Oliver James Peacock, Jay Suntharalingam, John Gerard Coghlan, Daniel Xavier Augustine
Background: The world symposium on pulmonary hypertension (PH) has proposed that PH be defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg as assessed by right heart catheterisation (RHC). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an established screening tool used for suspected PH. International guidelines recommend a multi-parameter assessment of the TTE PH probability although effectiveness has not been established using real world data.
Study aims: To determine accuracy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) TTE probability algorithm in detecting PH in patients attending a UK PH centre. To identify echocardiographic markers and revised algorithms to improve the detection of PH in those with low/intermediate BSE/ESC TTE PH probability.
Methods: TTE followed by RHC (within 4 months after) was undertaken in patients for suspected but previously unconfirmed PH. BSE/ESC PH TTE probabilities were calculated alongside additional markers of right ventricular (RV) longitudinal and radial function, and RV diastolic function. A refined IMPULSE algorithm was devised and evaluated in patients with low and/or intermediate ESC/BSE TTE PH probability.
Results: Of 310 patients assessed, 236 (76%) had RHC-confirmed PH (average mPAP 42.8 ± 11.7). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting PH using the BSE/ESC recommendations was 89% and 68%, respectively. 36% of those with low BSE/ESC TTE probability had RHC-confirmed PH and BSE/ESC PH probability parameters did not differ amongst those with and without PH in the low probability group. Conversely, RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) was lower in patients with vs. without PH in low BSE/ESC probability group (- 20.6 ± 4.1% vs - 23.8 ± 3.9%) (P < 0.02). Incorporating RVFWLS and TTE features of RV radial and diastolic function (RVFAC and IVRT) within the IMPULSE algorithm reduced false negatives in patients with low BSE/ESC PH probability by 29%. The IMPULSE algorithm had excellent specificity and positive predictive value in those with low (93%/80%, respectively) or intermediate (82%/86%, respectively) PH probability.
Conclusion: Existing TTE PH probability guidelines lack sensitivity to detect patients with milder haemodynamic forms of PH. Combining additional TTE makers assessing RV radial, longitudinal and diastolic function enhance identification of milder forms of PH, particularly in those who have a low BSE/ESC TTE PH probability.
{"title":"IMproving PULmonary hypertension Screening by Echocardiography: IMPULSE.","authors":"Oliver Graham Slegg, James Alexander Willis, Fiona Wilkinson, Joseph Sparey, Christopher Basil Wild, Jennifer Rossdale, Robert Mackenzie Ross, John D Pauling, Kevin Carson, Sri Raveen Kandan, David Oxborough, Daniel Knight, Oliver James Peacock, Jay Suntharalingam, John Gerard Coghlan, Daniel Xavier Augustine","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00010-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44156-022-00010-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The world symposium on pulmonary hypertension (PH) has proposed that PH be defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg as assessed by right heart catheterisation (RHC). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an established screening tool used for suspected PH. International guidelines recommend a multi-parameter assessment of the TTE PH probability although effectiveness has not been established using real world data.</p><p><strong>Study aims: </strong>To determine accuracy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) TTE probability algorithm in detecting PH in patients attending a UK PH centre. To identify echocardiographic markers and revised algorithms to improve the detection of PH in those with low/intermediate BSE/ESC TTE PH probability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TTE followed by RHC (within 4 months after) was undertaken in patients for suspected but previously unconfirmed PH. BSE/ESC PH TTE probabilities were calculated alongside additional markers of right ventricular (RV) longitudinal and radial function, and RV diastolic function. A refined IMPULSE algorithm was devised and evaluated in patients with low and/or intermediate ESC/BSE TTE PH probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 310 patients assessed, 236 (76%) had RHC-confirmed PH (average mPAP 42.8 ± 11.7). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting PH using the BSE/ESC recommendations was 89% and 68%, respectively. 36% of those with low BSE/ESC TTE probability had RHC-confirmed PH and BSE/ESC PH probability parameters did not differ amongst those with and without PH in the low probability group. Conversely, RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) was lower in patients with vs. without PH in low BSE/ESC probability group (- 20.6 ± 4.1% vs - 23.8 ± 3.9%) (P < 0.02). Incorporating RVFWLS and TTE features of RV radial and diastolic function (RVFAC and IVRT) within the IMPULSE algorithm reduced false negatives in patients with low BSE/ESC PH probability by 29%. The IMPULSE algorithm had excellent specificity and positive predictive value in those with low (93%/80%, respectively) or intermediate (82%/86%, respectively) PH probability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing TTE PH probability guidelines lack sensitivity to detect patients with milder haemodynamic forms of PH. Combining additional TTE makers assessing RV radial, longitudinal and diastolic function enhance identification of milder forms of PH, particularly in those who have a low BSE/ESC TTE PH probability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40339241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-18DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00006-5
Liam Corbett, Jan Forster, Wendy Gamlin, Nuno Duarte, Owen Burgess, Allan Harkness, Wei Li, John Simpson, Radwa Bedair
Transthoracic echocardiography is an essential tool in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of paediatric and adult populations with suspected or confirmed congenital heart disease. Congenital echocardiography is highly operator-dependent, requiring advanced technical acquisition and interpretative skill levels. This document is designed to complement previous congenital echocardiography literature by providing detailed practical echocardiography imaging guidance on sequential segmental analysis, and is intended for implementation predominantly, but not exclusively, within adult congenital heart disease settings. It encompasses the recommended dataset to be performed and is structured in the preferred order for a complete anatomical and functional sequential segmental congenital echocardiogram. It is recommended that this level of study be performed at least once on all patients being assessed by a specialist congenital cardiology service. This document will be supplemented by a series of practical pathology specific congenital echocardiography guidelines. Collectively, these will provide structure and standardisation to image acquisition and reporting, to ensure that all important information is collected and interpreted appropriately.
{"title":"A practical guideline for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram in the congenital heart disease patient: consensus recommendations from the British Society of Echocardiography.","authors":"Liam Corbett, Jan Forster, Wendy Gamlin, Nuno Duarte, Owen Burgess, Allan Harkness, Wei Li, John Simpson, Radwa Bedair","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00006-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00006-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transthoracic echocardiography is an essential tool in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of paediatric and adult populations with suspected or confirmed congenital heart disease. Congenital echocardiography is highly operator-dependent, requiring advanced technical acquisition and interpretative skill levels. This document is designed to complement previous congenital echocardiography literature by providing detailed practical echocardiography imaging guidance on sequential segmental analysis, and is intended for implementation predominantly, but not exclusively, within adult congenital heart disease settings. It encompasses the recommended dataset to be performed and is structured in the preferred order for a complete anatomical and functional sequential segmental congenital echocardiogram. It is recommended that this level of study be performed at least once on all patients being assessed by a specialist congenital cardiology service. This document will be supplemented by a series of practical pathology specific congenital echocardiography guidelines. Collectively, these will provide structure and standardisation to image acquisition and reporting, to ensure that all important information is collected and interpreted appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40395385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00009-2
Sher May Ng, Danial Naqvi, Jose Bingcang, Gemma Cruz, Richard Nose, Guy Lloyd, Marie Elsya Speechly-Dick, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya
Background: There has been a growing demand for echocardiography services over the last 5 years, with this supply-demand mismatch exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior studies have suggested a high proportion of normal findings among echocardiograms requested for patients without known cardiovascular disease, particularly in low-risk cohorts. This pilot study investigates the role of an abbreviated echocardiography protocol in improving access to echocardiography services in a low-risk outpatient setting within the rapid access chest pain (RACP) clinic.
Method: A retrospective review of electronic medical records and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies for 212 patients from RACP clinic in 2019 (cohort A), prior to the introduction of the abbreviated echocardiography protocol, and 175 patients seen in the RACP clinic in 2021 (cohort B) was performed. The outcomes measured include the echocardiography referral burden from RACP clinic, waiting time for a TTE and echocardiography findings.
Results: 33% and 45% of patients seen in the RACP clinic in 2019 and 2021, respectively, were referred for a TTE. The most common indications include chest pain (50%), dyspnoea (19%) and palpitations (11%). Abnormal findings were identified in 36% of TTEs performed in cohort A and 13% in cohort B. The median echocardiogram study time was significantly shorter in cohort B (7 min vs 13 min, p < 0.00001), with a lower number of images acquired (43 vs. 62, p < 0.00001). The median waiting time for an echocardiography in cohort B was significantly shorter (median: 14 days vs. 42 days in 2019, p < 0.00001). No major pathologies were missed on a retrospective review of these images.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that an abbreviated echocardiography protocol has potential to improve access to echocardiography services through increasing scheduling capacity, without compromising diagnostic performance in a low-risk outpatient population.
{"title":"Feasibility, diagnostic performance and clinical value of an abbreviated echocardiography protocol in an out-patient cardiovascular setting: a pilot study.","authors":"Sher May Ng, Danial Naqvi, Jose Bingcang, Gemma Cruz, Richard Nose, Guy Lloyd, Marie Elsya Speechly-Dick, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00009-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00009-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a growing demand for echocardiography services over the last 5 years, with this supply-demand mismatch exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior studies have suggested a high proportion of normal findings among echocardiograms requested for patients without known cardiovascular disease, particularly in low-risk cohorts. This pilot study investigates the role of an abbreviated echocardiography protocol in improving access to echocardiography services in a low-risk outpatient setting within the rapid access chest pain (RACP) clinic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective review of electronic medical records and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies for 212 patients from RACP clinic in 2019 (cohort A), prior to the introduction of the abbreviated echocardiography protocol, and 175 patients seen in the RACP clinic in 2021 (cohort B) was performed. The outcomes measured include the echocardiography referral burden from RACP clinic, waiting time for a TTE and echocardiography findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33% and 45% of patients seen in the RACP clinic in 2019 and 2021, respectively, were referred for a TTE. The most common indications include chest pain (50%), dyspnoea (19%) and palpitations (11%). Abnormal findings were identified in 36% of TTEs performed in cohort A and 13% in cohort B. The median echocardiogram study time was significantly shorter in cohort B (7 min vs 13 min, p < 0.00001), with a lower number of images acquired (43 vs. 62, p < 0.00001). The median waiting time for an echocardiography in cohort B was significantly shorter (median: 14 days vs. 42 days in 2019, p < 0.00001). No major pathologies were missed on a retrospective review of these images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that an abbreviated echocardiography protocol has potential to improve access to echocardiography services through increasing scheduling capacity, without compromising diagnostic performance in a low-risk outpatient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40357608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-23DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00008-3
Thomas R Porter, Steven B Feinstein, Roxy Senior, Sharon L Mulvagh, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, Jordan B Strom, Wilson Mathias, Beverly Gorman, Arnaldo Rabischoffsky, Michael L Main, Andrew Appis
The present CEUS Cardiac Exam Protocols represent the first effort to promulgate a standard set of protocols for optimal administration of ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) in echocardiography, based on more than two decades of experience in the use of UEAs for cardiac imaging. The protocols reflect current clinical CEUS practice in many modern echocardiography laboratories throughout the world. Specific attention is given to preparation and dosing of three UEAs that have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and additional regulatory bodies in Europe, the Americas and Asia-Pacific. Consistent with professional society guidelines (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:241-274, 2018; J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:797-810, 2014; Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:1205, 2017), these protocols cover unapproved "off-label" uses of UEAs-including stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging-in addition to approved uses. Accordingly, these protocols may differ from information provided in product labels, which are generally based on studies performed prior to product approval and may not always reflect state of the art clinical practice or guidelines.
{"title":"CEUS cardiac exam protocols International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS) recommendations.","authors":"Thomas R Porter, Steven B Feinstein, Roxy Senior, Sharon L Mulvagh, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, Jordan B Strom, Wilson Mathias, Beverly Gorman, Arnaldo Rabischoffsky, Michael L Main, Andrew Appis","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00008-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00008-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present CEUS Cardiac Exam Protocols represent the first effort to promulgate a standard set of protocols for optimal administration of ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) in echocardiography, based on more than two decades of experience in the use of UEAs for cardiac imaging. The protocols reflect current clinical CEUS practice in many modern echocardiography laboratories throughout the world. Specific attention is given to preparation and dosing of three UEAs that have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and additional regulatory bodies in Europe, the Americas and Asia-Pacific. Consistent with professional society guidelines (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:241-274, 2018; J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:797-810, 2014; Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:1205, 2017), these protocols cover unapproved \"off-label\" uses of UEAs-including stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging-in addition to approved uses. Accordingly, these protocols may differ from information provided in product labels, which are generally based on studies performed prior to product approval and may not always reflect state of the art clinical practice or guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-17DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00005-6
Panagiotis Savvoulidis, William E Moody, Rick Steeds, Peter F Ludman, Joseph R Bradley, Aldrin Singh, Ewa Lawton, M Adnan Nadir, Sagar N Doshi
Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) under conscious sedation is the most widely used method of implantation. Echocardiography is used to detect complications and to assess the implantation result. The aim of this paper is to provide a time-efficient protocol when transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is used to guide TAVI procedures.
{"title":"A time-efficient protocol for transthoracic echocardiography during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: early identification and effective management of intraprocedural complications.","authors":"Panagiotis Savvoulidis, William E Moody, Rick Steeds, Peter F Ludman, Joseph R Bradley, Aldrin Singh, Ewa Lawton, M Adnan Nadir, Sagar N Doshi","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00005-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44156-022-00005-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) under conscious sedation is the most widely used method of implantation. Echocardiography is used to detect complications and to assess the implantation result. The aim of this paper is to provide a time-efficient protocol when transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is used to guide TAVI procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40632584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-13DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00007-4
Mark Monaghan
{"title":"Echo Research and Practice enters a new era.","authors":"Mark Monaghan","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00007-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00007-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277952/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40609853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-13DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00003-8
Sadie Bennett, Martin Stout, Thomas E Ingram, Keith Pearce, Timothy Griffiths, Simon Duckett, Grant Heatlie, Patrick Thompson, Judith Tweedie, Jo Sopala, Sarah Ritzmann, Kelly Victor, Judith Skipper, Shaun Robinson, Andrew Potter, Daniel X Augustine, Claire L Colebourn
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is widely utilised within many aspects of clinical practice, as such the demand placed on echocardiography services is ever increasing. In an attempt to provide incremental value for patients and standardise patient care, the British Society of Echocardiography in collaboration with the British Heart Valve Society have devised updated guidance for the indications and triaging of adult TTE requests for TTE services to implement into clinical practice.
{"title":"Clinical indications and triaging for adult transthoracic echocardiography: a consensus statement by the British Society of Echocardiography in collaboration with British Heart Valve Society.","authors":"Sadie Bennett, Martin Stout, Thomas E Ingram, Keith Pearce, Timothy Griffiths, Simon Duckett, Grant Heatlie, Patrick Thompson, Judith Tweedie, Jo Sopala, Sarah Ritzmann, Kelly Victor, Judith Skipper, Shaun Robinson, Andrew Potter, Daniel X Augustine, Claire L Colebourn","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00003-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44156-022-00003-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is widely utilised within many aspects of clinical practice, as such the demand placed on echocardiography services is ever increasing. In an attempt to provide incremental value for patients and standardise patient care, the British Society of Echocardiography in collaboration with the British Heart Valve Society have devised updated guidance for the indications and triaging of adult TTE requests for TTE services to implement into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9078545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-13DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00004-7
Sadie Bennett, Jacopo Tafuro, Marcus Brumpton, Caragh Bardolia, Grant Heatlie, Simon Duckett, Paul Ridley, Prakash Nanjaiah, Chun Shing Kwok
Background: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality characterized by the distinct separation of the mitral valve annulus/left atrium wall and myocardium. Little is known about the significance of MAD in patients requiring mitral valve surgery. This evaluation evaluates the echocardiographic characteristics and patient outcomes for patients with and without MAD who require mitral valve surgery.
Methods: All patients who underwent mitral valve surgery and who had a pre-surgical transthoracic echocardiogram between 2013 and 2020 were included. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected on review of patient electronic records.
Results: A total of 185 patients were included in the analysis of which 32.4% had MAD (average MAD length 8.4 mm). MAD was seen most commonly in patients with mitral valve prolapse and myxomatous mitral valves disease (90% and 60% respectively). In the patients with MAD prior to mitral valve surgery, only 3.9% had MAD post mitral valve surgery. There were no significant difference in the severity of post-operative mitral regurgitation, arrhythmic events or major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with and without MAD.
Conclusions: MAD is common in patients who undergo mitral valve surgery. Current surgical techniques are able to correct the MAD abnormality in the vast majority of patients. MAD is not associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes post mitral valve surgery.
{"title":"Echocardiographic description and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with and without mitral annular disjunction: a health service evaluation.","authors":"Sadie Bennett, Jacopo Tafuro, Marcus Brumpton, Caragh Bardolia, Grant Heatlie, Simon Duckett, Paul Ridley, Prakash Nanjaiah, Chun Shing Kwok","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00004-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00004-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality characterized by the distinct separation of the mitral valve annulus/left atrium wall and myocardium. Little is known about the significance of MAD in patients requiring mitral valve surgery. This evaluation evaluates the echocardiographic characteristics and patient outcomes for patients with and without MAD who require mitral valve surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent mitral valve surgery and who had a pre-surgical transthoracic echocardiogram between 2013 and 2020 were included. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected on review of patient electronic records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 185 patients were included in the analysis of which 32.4% had MAD (average MAD length 8.4 mm). MAD was seen most commonly in patients with mitral valve prolapse and myxomatous mitral valves disease (90% and 60% respectively). In the patients with MAD prior to mitral valve surgery, only 3.9% had MAD post mitral valve surgery. There were no significant difference in the severity of post-operative mitral regurgitation, arrhythmic events or major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with and without MAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAD is common in patients who undergo mitral valve surgery. Current surgical techniques are able to correct the MAD abnormality in the vast majority of patients. MAD is not associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes post mitral valve surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40609874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-06DOI: 10.1186/s44156-022-00002-9
Michael Dunleavy, Alan B Goldberg, S. Feinstein, Stephanie Wilson, S. Mulvagh, P. Nihoyannopoulos
{"title":"The 35th annual advances in contrast ultrasound international bubble conference, Chicago 2021: synopsis and take-home messages","authors":"Michael Dunleavy, Alan B Goldberg, S. Feinstein, Stephanie Wilson, S. Mulvagh, P. Nihoyannopoulos","doi":"10.1186/s44156-022-00002-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-022-00002-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48542242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}