Pub Date : 2023-10-18DOI: 10.1177/87564793231202269
Katherine Peak
Objective: This study was designed to explore the teaching self-efficacy, by clinical preceptors instructing sonography students, in bachelor’s degree-accredited sonography programs. Materials and Methods: A survey was provided to sonography clinical preceptors, to gauge their level of teaching self-efficacy. The survey instrument, Sonography Preceptor Teaching Self-Efficacy Inventory (SPTSEI) was used. The intent of the survey was to gauge, holistically, sonography preceptors’ perceptions of influencing student learning, in a clinical setting. Results: The survey respondents suggested that they had a high level of confidence in their skill to transmit knowledge and abilities to students. However, it was found that preceptors who had received some type of professional development, as preceptor, had a statistically significant higher level of teaching self-efficacy than those who had not received any type of training. Conclusion: Clinical preceptors are skilled health care professionals in their chosen discipline but may have little to no teaching experience. If preceptors do not fully understand their role in the educational process, both they and their students may not attain educational goals. It is therefore critically important that proper training and education, to support clinical preceptors, be provided for them. This survey would suggest that clinical preceptors, with training, can better perform their educational roles and better handle any challenges that might arise, as a part of providing clinical education.
{"title":"The Ability for Teaching Self-Efficacy by Clinical Preceptors in Diagnostic Medical Sonography","authors":"Katherine Peak","doi":"10.1177/87564793231202269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231202269","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to explore the teaching self-efficacy, by clinical preceptors instructing sonography students, in bachelor’s degree-accredited sonography programs. Materials and Methods: A survey was provided to sonography clinical preceptors, to gauge their level of teaching self-efficacy. The survey instrument, Sonography Preceptor Teaching Self-Efficacy Inventory (SPTSEI) was used. The intent of the survey was to gauge, holistically, sonography preceptors’ perceptions of influencing student learning, in a clinical setting. Results: The survey respondents suggested that they had a high level of confidence in their skill to transmit knowledge and abilities to students. However, it was found that preceptors who had received some type of professional development, as preceptor, had a statistically significant higher level of teaching self-efficacy than those who had not received any type of training. Conclusion: Clinical preceptors are skilled health care professionals in their chosen discipline but may have little to no teaching experience. If preceptors do not fully understand their role in the educational process, both they and their students may not attain educational goals. It is therefore critically important that proper training and education, to support clinical preceptors, be provided for them. This survey would suggest that clinical preceptors, with training, can better perform their educational roles and better handle any challenges that might arise, as a part of providing clinical education.","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135883202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This study was designed to use sonography and evaluate arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in dialysis patients. The aim was to determine criteria for distinguishing between patent AVFs with proper function (healthy) and unhealthy AVFs. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 106 dialysis patients with an AVF. All fistulas were evaluated using spectral Doppler and grayscale sonography, assessing parameters such as draining vein diameter, distance of the venous vein from the skin surface, feeding artery diameter, presence of thrombosis, and fistula stenosis. Subsequently, Doppler criteria such as flow volume (FV) and resistance index (RI) were measured and compared between healthy and unhealthy AVFs. Results: This cohort’s spectral Doppler findings demonstrated lower FV and higher RI, in unhealthy AVFs, compared to healthy ones (283.5 ± 101.26 mL/min vs 1383.43 ± 756.76 mL/min; P = .006) and (0.55 ± 0.33 vs 0.37 ± 0.14; P = .004) respectively. Conclusion: The spectral Doppler and grayscale sonographic imaging made it possible to evaluate AVF performance and determine its quality. In this cohort, a decreased FV, increased RI, and decreased draining vein diameter were observed in unhealthy AVFs. These results would suggest that sonographers and clinicians should pay close attention to these parameters when assessing the function of an AVF, for patients undergoing hemodialysis.
目的:应用超声技术评价透析患者的动静脉瘘(avf)。目的是确定区分功能正常(健康)的专利avf和不健康的avf的标准。材料和方法:本研究纳入106例AVF透析患者。所有瘘管均采用频谱多普勒和灰度超声进行评估,评估引流静脉直径、静脉与皮肤表面的距离、供血动脉直径、血栓形成情况和瘘管狭窄等参数。随后,测量多普勒标准,如流量(FV)和阻力指数(RI),并比较健康和不健康avf之间的差异。结果:该队列的频谱多普勒结果显示,与健康的avf相比,不健康的avf的FV较低,RI较高(283.5±101.26 mL/min vs 1383.43±756.76 mL/min;P = 0.006)和(0.55±0.33 vs 0.37±0.14;P = .004)。结论:超声多普勒和灰度成像技术可以评价AVF的性能,确定其质量。在这个队列中,在不健康的avf中观察到FV降低、RI增加和引流静脉直径减小。这些结果提示超声医师和临床医生在评估血液透析患者的AVF功能时应密切关注这些参数。
{"title":"The Flow Volume and Resistance Index of Patent Arteriovenous Fistulas, With Proper Function, Compared to Unhealthy Arteriovenous Fistulas, Using Spectral Doppler","authors":"Negar Heydari, Neda Akhoundi, Abdolhassan Shakeri-Bavil, Javad Jalili, Elnaz Heydari, Alireza Siami, Jalal Etemadi, Sonia Sedghian, Zahra Naseri, Sajjad Pourasghary","doi":"10.1177/87564793231202523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231202523","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to use sonography and evaluate arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in dialysis patients. The aim was to determine criteria for distinguishing between patent AVFs with proper function (healthy) and unhealthy AVFs. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 106 dialysis patients with an AVF. All fistulas were evaluated using spectral Doppler and grayscale sonography, assessing parameters such as draining vein diameter, distance of the venous vein from the skin surface, feeding artery diameter, presence of thrombosis, and fistula stenosis. Subsequently, Doppler criteria such as flow volume (FV) and resistance index (RI) were measured and compared between healthy and unhealthy AVFs. Results: This cohort’s spectral Doppler findings demonstrated lower FV and higher RI, in unhealthy AVFs, compared to healthy ones (283.5 ± 101.26 mL/min vs 1383.43 ± 756.76 mL/min; P = .006) and (0.55 ± 0.33 vs 0.37 ± 0.14; P = .004) respectively. Conclusion: The spectral Doppler and grayscale sonographic imaging made it possible to evaluate AVF performance and determine its quality. In this cohort, a decreased FV, increased RI, and decreased draining vein diameter were observed in unhealthy AVFs. These results would suggest that sonographers and clinicians should pay close attention to these parameters when assessing the function of an AVF, for patients undergoing hemodialysis.","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136034208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201586
3. According to this study, which individual factor has a larger common bile duct diameter? A. Prior coronary stenting B. Age less than 60 years old C. Woman D. Hypotension 4. The findings of this study showed a relationship between ____________. A. Common bile duct dilatation and coronary atherosclerosis B. Biliary atresia and common bile duct dilatation C. Hypertension and coronary atherosclerosis D. Common bile duct dilatation and hypotension
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – The Association Between Common Bile Duct Diameter and the Severity of Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis, Based on Calcium Score","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201586","url":null,"abstract":"3. According to this study, which individual factor has a larger common bile duct diameter? A. Prior coronary stenting B. Age less than 60 years old C. Woman D. Hypotension 4. The findings of this study showed a relationship between ____________. A. Common bile duct dilatation and coronary atherosclerosis B. Biliary atresia and common bile duct dilatation C. Hypertension and coronary atherosclerosis D. Common bile duct dilatation and hypotension","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136113510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201588
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – A Large Idiopathic Arteriovenous Malformation of the Right Lung, Which Was Mistaken for Lung Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201588","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201588","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136113504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201594
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – Assessing the Potential for Error in Investigating Intraneural Vascularity: A Need for a Standardized Imaging Protocol","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201594","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136113686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201587
3. The aim of this study was to ____________. A. Determine the accuracy of EPSS measurement B. Determine the extent of agreement on the measured echocardiographic EF measured by EM residents compared to a cardiologist C. Evaluate echocardiogram read times for critical patients D. Prove that visual assessment of EF is more accurate than Simpson’s method 4. This study compared echocardiogram interpretations from cardiologists and ________. A. Emergency medicine residents B. Cardiology fellows C. General surgeons D. Nurse practitioners
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – Determining the Extent of Agreement for Determining the Echographic Ejection Fraction Determined by Emergency Medicine Residents Compared with a Cardiologist","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201587","url":null,"abstract":"3. The aim of this study was to ____________. A. Determine the accuracy of EPSS measurement B. Determine the extent of agreement on the measured echocardiographic EF measured by EM residents compared to a cardiologist C. Evaluate echocardiogram read times for critical patients D. Prove that visual assessment of EF is more accurate than Simpson’s method 4. This study compared echocardiogram interpretations from cardiologists and ________. A. Emergency medicine residents B. Cardiology fellows C. General surgeons D. Nurse practitioners","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136114315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201593
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – Fetal Bowel Dilatation Associated With LCHAD Deficiency: A New Sonographic Finding","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201593","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136113076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201581
8. Which imaging modality is recommended as a first-line approach to the diagnosis of PAS? A. Contrast-enhanced CT B. Non-contrast MRI C. Grayscale and color Doppler sonography D. PET 9. What is the reported sensitivity and specificity of sonography with color Doppler supplementation? A. 12-15% and 35-45% respectively B. 25-35% and 50-60% respectively C. 40-50% and 65-70% respectively D. 82-100% and 70-100% respectively
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Current Literature Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201581","url":null,"abstract":"8. Which imaging modality is recommended as a first-line approach to the diagnosis of PAS? A. Contrast-enhanced CT B. Non-contrast MRI C. Grayscale and color Doppler sonography D. PET 9. What is the reported sensitivity and specificity of sonography with color Doppler supplementation? A. 12-15% and 35-45% respectively B. 25-35% and 50-60% respectively C. 40-50% and 65-70% respectively D. 82-100% and 70-100% respectively","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136113844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201582
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – The Accuracy of Various Lung Ultrasonography Findings in Predicting the Necessity for Surfactant Treatment in Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201582","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136114318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1177/87564793231201583
2. Migration of biliary stents is a complication which may be seen in what percentage of patients who have undergone biliary stenting? A. More than 20% B. 10 – 20 % C. 5 – 10% D. Less than 4% 3. Figure 3 demonstrates a dual transverse sonogram that illustrates the proximal biliary stent. What does the solid white arrow identify? A. The proximal biliary stent in the GB lumen B. The distal biliary stent in the CBD C. The double lumen of the biliary stent in the head of the pancreas D. Choledocholithiasis in the CBD
{"title":"SDMS CME Credit – A Biliary Stent in the Gallbladder Lumen: Misplacement or Migration?","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/87564793231201583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231201583","url":null,"abstract":"2. Migration of biliary stents is a complication which may be seen in what percentage of patients who have undergone biliary stenting? A. More than 20% B. 10 – 20 % C. 5 – 10% D. Less than 4% 3. Figure 3 demonstrates a dual transverse sonogram that illustrates the proximal biliary stent. What does the solid white arrow identify? A. The proximal biliary stent in the GB lumen B. The distal biliary stent in the CBD C. The double lumen of the biliary stent in the head of the pancreas D. Choledocholithiasis in the CBD","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136114602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}