Journal of Infusion Nursing最新文献

The objective of this study was to operationally define the concept of success in peripheral intravenous catheterization in children considering the Walker and Avant model. This is a methodological study, carried out through the following steps: concept selection, the definition of the analysis objective, identification of possible uses of the concept, determination of critical or essential attributes, construction of a model and opposite case, and identification of antecedents and consequences. The study was carried out based on a search in international databases from January to March 2021. The sample consisted of 47 studies conducted in 17 countries between 2008 and 2021. Five attributes, 20 antecedents, 10 consequences, and an empirical reference of the studied concept were identified. Also, 2 cases, model and opposite, were elaborated, and an operational definition of the concept was developed. The Walker and Avant method enabled the operationalization of the concept of success of peripheral intravenous catheterization in children based on attributes, antecedents and consequents, and model and opposite cases.

Venipuncture for blood collection is frequently delegated to medical or nursing students, while their individual skills depend on the quality of teaching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a near infrared imaging (NIR) system on the visualization of veins and its potential benefit for the education of medical personnel. Participants answered a questionnaire following standardized venipuncture for blood sampling with the help of an NIR device. Vein visibility with the NIR device and its ability to facilitate venipuncture were examined. Visibility of veins was significantly better with the NIR, and its direction was clearly delineated. Sixty-nine percent of the participants stated that they felt more secure with venipuncture after using the NIR device. Patients' individual factors limited the visibility of veins. The adjuvant use of an NIR system for venipuncture improves participants' subjective skills through visualization of veins and their direction.

Oncology and critical care patients often require central vascular access devices (CVADs), which can make them prone to central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and thrombotic occlusions. According to the literature, CLABSIs are rampant and increased by 63% during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for innovative interventions. Four percent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (4% EDTA) is an antimicrobial locking solution that reduces CLABSIs, thrombotic occlusions, and biofilm. This retrospective pre-post quality improvement project determined if 4% EDTA could improve patient safety by decreasing CLABSIs and central catheter occlusions. This was implemented in all adult cancer and critical care units at a regional cancer hospital and center. Before implementing 4% EDTA, there were 36 CLABSI cases in 16 months (27 annualized). After implementation, there were 6 cases in 6 months (12 annualized), showing a statistically significant decrease of 59% in CLABSIs per 1000 catheter days. However, there was no significant difference in occlusions (alteplase use). Eighty-eight percent of patients had either a positive or neutral outlook, while most nurses reported needing 4% EDTA to be available in prefilled syringes. The pandemic and nursing shortages may have influenced the results; hence, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish a causal relationship between 4% EDTA and CLABSIs and occlusions.

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most commonly used invasive devices in acute care hospitals, with nurses being primarily responsible for the insertion and care of these devices. This point prevalence study aimed to describe current PIVC status and nursing documentation in a large, regional health care system and to explore variables associated with PIVC complications. The study was conducted with adult inpatients. There were 665 PIVCs included in the study. Dressings were clean, dry, and intact in 83% of observations; only 2.7% did not have a transparent dressing. Thirty-one percent of PIVCs were inserted in areas of flexion. Median dwell time was 2.39 days (± 2.36 days), with upper arm sites having the longest dwell time. Overall inter-rater reliability (IRR) for an infiltration or phlebitis score of 0 was high (97.4% and 92%, respectively). However, overall agreement was only 77.16% for infiltration and 40.07% for phlebitis, with significant disagreement as scores increased. Study findings support that there was strong compliance with the Infusion Nurses Society's (INS) Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice vascular access practice recommendations; however, opportunities to improve infiltration/phlebitis assessment and documentation exist.

This study aimed to identify risk factors and combinations thereof that are associated with severe skin injuries due to the extravasation of injectable drugs. A cross-sectional study using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database was conducted according to the RECORD-PE checklist. Adverse event reports related to necrosis, ulcers, or erosions due to extravasation were considered "with severe skin injury," and others were considered "without severe skin injury." Approximately 255 cases "with" and 260 cases "without" severe skin injury were identified. The relationship between the incidence of severe skin injury and age, sex, drugs, and primary disease was evaluated using the χ2 test. Association rule mining was used to evaluate the correlation between each combination of factors and skin injury. Nine factors were identified as independent risk factors for severe skin injury, including age (<10 or ≥70 years), peripheral parenteral nutrition use, and mental disorders. The association rule mining results suggested that a combination of specific patient backgrounds and drug use was associated with the incidence of necrosis or ulcers. The findings of this study reiterate that nurses might consider closely observing patients with the risk factors identified in this study for the prevention and early detection of extravasation-related skin injuries.

Short peripheral intravenous catheters (short PIVCs) are commonly used in acute care, guided by evidence-based policy with interventions to limit premature failure. Research on how nurses use evidence and change processes to optimize outcomes is needed. The study objective was to use a theory-based implementation science approach to evaluate and improve short PIVC insertion and care processes and reduce removals for adverse outcomes in acute care. This mixed-methods study was conducted with inpatient nursing units (n = 23) at a large urban quaternary medical center. Units identified and implemented one PIVC care intervention that could lower catheter removals for adverse outcomes over 3 months. Data from multiple sources were convergently analyzed to evaluate process and outcomes postintervention. Although overall frequency of PIVC removals for adverse outcomes was unchanged, several units improved their outcomes using implementation strategies. The determinant framework provides a plausible explanation for the study results. While adverse outcome rates remained below published rates, some units had limited success improving outcomes with traditional change strategies. Implementation strategies and readily accessible data can offer nursing units a new approach to effectively deploy, monitor, and maintain interventions to achieve improved outcomes.

This study aimed to determine the practices of nurses working in pediatric and adult oncology clinics regarding totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) care. The descriptive study was conducted with 227 oncology nurse members of the Oncology Nursing Association. The data were collected online with a survey form, which included questions about the participants' sociodemographic characteristics, professional experience, and TIVAD implementation practices. Descriptive statistics and ꭓ2 tests were used for the analysis of the data. It was determined that 44.1% of the nurses used 0.9% NaCl for active TIVAD flushing; 15.9% of them used a positive-pressure 0.9% NaCl-filled syringe; 12.3% used antireflux connectors; 85.5% used manual positive pressure technique; and 53.7% used the pulsatile technique. A statistical difference was found between nurses' training on TIVAD care and TIVAD occlusion rate in the clinic, TIVAD infection rate, following the guidelines, and using the pulsatile technique (P < .05). This study revealed that there are differences in the practices for TIVAD care and that the recommendations in the literature/guidelines are not implemented at the desired level to ensure continuity and prevent complications.

This study aimed to compare patients' experience of pain during ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral venipuncture versus conventional peripheral venipuncture. This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a public university hospital in 2021. Adult patients with indication for intravenous therapy compatible with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) were included: intervention group (IG), US peripheral venipuncture executed by specialist nurses; control group (CG), conventional peripheral venipuncture executed by clinical practice nurses. The primary outcome was patient experience of pain during the procedure and patient experience related to the PIVC placement method. Sixty-four patients were included, 32 for each group. The pain experienced was none-to-mild in the IG for 25 patients (78.1%) and moderate-to-severe in the CG for 21 patients (65.7%; P < .001). The overall pain rating was 2 (1-3) in the IG and 4 (3-6) in the CG (P < .001). The recommendation of the procedure in IG (net promoter score [NPS] + 90.6%) versus CG (NPS + 18.8%) was considered excellent and good, respectively (P < .001). Patients had less pain and significantly recommended the US-guided procedure. Patient experience with US-guided PIVC, performed by a specialist nurse, was superior to that of conventional peripheral venipuncture.