The paper uses the most up-to-date data from US banks to investigate the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on bank stability. The results reveal that elevated uncertainty makes banks more fragile and prone to crash events through profitability erosion, capital buffer, and exacerbating return volatility. This negative impact of EPU is more pronounced for highly risky and large-size banks. The risk-increasing-effect of policy uncertainty was amplified during the global financial crisis. We provide insights into the uncertainty-bank fragility nexus under different circumstances related to the option-to-wait strategy, the pressure of the markets, and the dividend policy. The paper also highlights the bright side of diversification and transparency during the time of high policy turbulence. The study has implications for policy makers, regulators, and investors.
{"title":"Policy Uncertainty and Bank Stability: Investigation From Supply-Side Effect","authors":"Dung Viet Tran, Cuong Nguyen, Khanh Hoang","doi":"10.1111/infi.12460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12460","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper uses the most up-to-date data from US banks to investigate the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on bank stability. The results reveal that elevated uncertainty makes banks more fragile and prone to crash events through profitability erosion, capital buffer, and exacerbating return volatility. This negative impact of EPU is more pronounced for highly risky and large-size banks. The risk-increasing-effect of policy uncertainty was amplified during the global financial crisis. We provide insights into the uncertainty-bank fragility nexus under different circumstances related to the option-to-wait strategy, the pressure of the markets, and the dividend policy. The paper also highlights the bright side of diversification and transparency during the time of high policy turbulence. The study has implications for policy makers, regulators, and investors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46336,"journal":{"name":"International Finance","volume":"28 2","pages":"66-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infi.12460","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
What were the policies that created one of the world's largest financial and economic crisis (as a percent of GDP) in Lebanon in the early 2020s? An artificially strong currency peg created a consumption boom financed by government debt and international capital flows/remittances, exposing both the public and private sector to classic currency mismatch vulnerabilities. Moreover, a volatile deposit growth through international remittances created banking risks that both a government and a central bank needed to manage. High deposit growth resulted in large banks that invested in high interest-bearing USD deposits at the central bank. The central bank financed government debt, exposing the banking sector to sovereign debt. A worsening international economic environment and political fractionalization in a geopolitically sensitive region exacerbated the classic delays arising from taking difficult burden-sharing, distributional decisions to address the financial crisis.
{"title":"Lebanon: From Dollars to Lollars","authors":"Salim Baz, Lara Cathcart, Alexander Michaelides","doi":"10.1111/infi.12459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12459","url":null,"abstract":"<p>What were the policies that created one of the world's largest financial and economic crisis (as a percent of GDP) in Lebanon in the early 2020s? An artificially strong currency peg created a consumption boom financed by government debt and international capital flows/remittances, exposing both the public and private sector to classic currency mismatch vulnerabilities. Moreover, a volatile deposit growth through international remittances created banking risks that both a government and a central bank needed to manage. High deposit growth resulted in large banks that invested in high interest-bearing USD deposits at the central bank. The central bank financed government debt, exposing the banking sector to sovereign debt. A worsening international economic environment and political fractionalization in a geopolitically sensitive region exacerbated the classic delays arising from taking difficult burden-sharing, distributional decisions to address the financial crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46336,"journal":{"name":"International Finance","volume":"28 1","pages":"37-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infi.12459","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143801730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}