Pub Date : 2022-04-26eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2022/5098428
Natacha Lena Yembeau, Prosper Cabral Biapa Nya, Constant Anatole Pieme, Kevin Dedjam Tchouane, Christian Bernard Kengne Fotsing, Prudence Josela Nya Nkwikeu, Alfloditte Flore Feudjio, Phelix Bruno Telefo
Background: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) or sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality in Africa and other developing nations. Therefore, modern and traditional remedies are being introduced for use in the treatment and management of this disease. This is because safe, effective, and inexpensive therapeutic agents are urgently needed for the treatment of this disease in Africa and other developing nations.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify medicinal plant species commonly used by traditional healers in the treatment of sickle cell patients across some localities in the west region of Cameroon. Material and Methods. The ethnopharmacological survey was carried out in several districts within some localities of the western region of Cameroon. The survey was based on a semistructured questionnaire that was administered to 17 traditional healers and 62 sickle cell patients. It took place between November 2018 and March 2019. Personal information of participants and plant therapy data were gathered. Plants were identified at the National Herbarium of Cameroon. Literature review determined pharmacological effects and phytochemical compounds of the identified plants. Data were generally analysed using Epi Info 7 software for Windows.
Results: Twelve medicinal plant species belonging to 10 families are being used in the treatment of sickle cell anemia across the study sites. Euphorbiaceae is the dominant family with three plant species. Bark (39.3%) and seeds (35.7%) are the most used plant parts, which get administered through maceration, decoction, and chewing in water. According to the literature review, the identified plants have pharmacological effects and phytochemical compounds (especially polyphenols and alkaloids) that signify the presence of antioxidant compounds, which may possess an antisickling activity. There is therefore a need to conduct another study to scientifically validate (in vitro) antisickling properties of these plants.
Conclusion: This study has revealed promising medicinal plants that are currently applied in the traditional treatment of sickle cell anemia. Although still inconclusive, the association of pharmacological effects and phytochemical compounds with these medicinal plants justifies their use in traditional pharmacopoeia.
{"title":"Ethnopharmacological Study of the Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of Sickle Cell Anemia in the West Region of Cameroon.","authors":"Natacha Lena Yembeau, Prosper Cabral Biapa Nya, Constant Anatole Pieme, Kevin Dedjam Tchouane, Christian Bernard Kengne Fotsing, Prudence Josela Nya Nkwikeu, Alfloditte Flore Feudjio, Phelix Bruno Telefo","doi":"10.1155/2022/5098428","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/5098428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sickle cell anemia (SCA) or sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality in Africa and other developing nations. Therefore, modern and traditional remedies are being introduced for use in the treatment and management of this disease. This is because safe, effective, and inexpensive therapeutic agents are urgently needed for the treatment of this disease in Africa and other developing nations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to identify medicinal plant species commonly used by traditional healers in the treatment of sickle cell patients across some localities in the west region of Cameroon. <i>Material and Methods</i>. The ethnopharmacological survey was carried out in several districts within some localities of the western region of Cameroon. The survey was based on a semistructured questionnaire that was administered to 17 traditional healers and 62 sickle cell patients. It took place between November 2018 and March 2019. Personal information of participants and plant therapy data were gathered. Plants were identified at the National Herbarium of Cameroon. Literature review determined pharmacological effects and phytochemical compounds of the identified plants. Data were generally analysed using Epi Info 7 software for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve medicinal plant species belonging to 10 families are being used in the treatment of sickle cell anemia across the study sites. Euphorbiaceae is the dominant family with three plant species. Bark (39.3%) and seeds (35.7%) are the most used plant parts, which get administered through maceration, decoction, and chewing in water. According to the literature review, the identified plants have pharmacological effects and phytochemical compounds (especially polyphenols and alkaloids) that signify the presence of antioxidant compounds, which may possess an antisickling activity. There is therefore a need to conduct another study to scientifically validate (in vitro) antisickling properties of these plants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has revealed promising medicinal plants that are currently applied in the traditional treatment of sickle cell anemia. Although still inconclusive, the association of pharmacological effects and phytochemical compounds with these medicinal plants justifies their use in traditional pharmacopoeia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"1 1","pages":"5098428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84879821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Great Irish Famine of 1845–1852 was a defining event in the development of modern Ireland. As a result of large-scale and sustained emigration, it was also a transnational event, creating diasporas that regarded the Famine as their foundation story. Following decades of silence and limited scholarship, the 150th anniversary of the first appearance of potato blight in 1995 triggered a global interest that extended far beyond academia. This overview of the historiography and recent debates concerning the Great Famine suggests a vibrancy and an interest that shows no sign of abating. It has resulted in an ever-growing body of scholarship that is constantly providing fresh and nuanced ways of understanding this tragedy, through the use of new methodological and theoretical approaches and partnerships with professionals outside the academy.
{"title":"A Modest Proposal: New directions in researching and understanding Ireland's Great Famine","authors":"Christine Kinealy","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12726","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12726","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Great Irish Famine of 1845–1852 was a defining event in the development of modern Ireland. As a result of large-scale and sustained emigration, it was also a transnational event, creating diasporas that regarded the Famine as their foundation story. Following decades of silence and limited scholarship, the 150th anniversary of the first appearance of potato blight in 1995 triggered a global interest that extended far beyond academia. This overview of the historiography and recent debates concerning the Great Famine suggests a vibrancy and an interest that shows no sign of abating. It has resulted in an ever-growing body of scholarship that is constantly providing fresh and nuanced ways of understanding this tragedy, through the use of new methodological and theoretical approaches and partnerships with professionals outside the academy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45721850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Slavery was practiced in parts of the Islamicate world from the 7th through 21st centuries. Until the late 20th century, many authors claimed that Islamicate slavery was relatively benign and free from racism. However, recent scholarship has found evidence of race-thinking in Islamicate history—particularly anti-Black racism and an association between Blackness and enslavement—tracing back at least to the ninth-century CE. Scholars still contest what racial categories or forms of race-thinking existed in the first centuries of Islamicate history. The Quran is free from overt race-thinking, but the Islamic conquests of the seventh and eighth centuries seem to have precipitated the articulation of new racialized categories and the application of old ones from the Biblical and Greek traditions. Considerations of gender further complicate the picture, as most of those enslaved in early Islamicate history were women, and many enslaved concubines bore children for their enslavers. The identity of these children was contested in the seventh century, but they seem to have defined themselves as full Arabs by the mid-eighth century. Ultimately, the intersection of race, gender, and slavery in early Islamicate history is not a linear narrative, but a complex story of negotiation and contestation.
{"title":"Race, gender and slavery in early Islamicate history","authors":"Elizabeth Urban","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12727","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12727","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Slavery was practiced in parts of the Islamicate world from the 7th through 21st centuries. Until the late 20th century, many authors claimed that Islamicate slavery was relatively benign and free from racism. However, recent scholarship has found evidence of race-thinking in Islamicate history—particularly anti-Black racism and an association between Blackness and enslavement—tracing back at least to the ninth-century CE. Scholars still contest what racial categories or forms of race-thinking existed in the first centuries of Islamicate history. The Quran is free from overt race-thinking, but the Islamic conquests of the seventh and eighth centuries seem to have precipitated the articulation of new racialized categories and the application of old ones from the Biblical and Greek traditions. Considerations of gender further complicate the picture, as most of those enslaved in early Islamicate history were women, and many enslaved concubines bore children for their enslavers. The identity of these children was contested in the seventh century, but they seem to have defined themselves as full Arabs by the mid-eighth century. Ultimately, the intersection of race, gender, and slavery in early Islamicate history is not a linear narrative, but a complex story of negotiation and contestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41488748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this contribution, our common point of convergence as an anthropologist and a literary scholar is to see Swahili language, literature and other texts as interwoven with the depth, scope, and complex dynamics of human experience and social life on the East Africa coast, with its long history of Islam. This includes prominently a view as to how this relates or is integral to the larger Indian Ocean world. Swahili language and its genres have been shaped in relation to, and in context of, transregional interaction with other languages and traditions that carry influence, and significance for the coastal residents. Ideas, thoughts, arguments and verse are taken on, adapted, mediated and disseminated flexibly by Swahili speakers through language repertoires and (mostly poetic) genres in changing media. These range from oral performances and handwritten manuscripts to booklets, CD recordings, radio programs and social media platforms.
{"title":"Swahili language and literature as resources for Indian Ocean studies","authors":"Kai Kresse, Clarissa Vierke","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12725","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12725","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this contribution, our common point of convergence as an anthropologist and a literary scholar is to see Swahili language, literature and other texts as interwoven with the depth, scope, and complex dynamics of human experience and social life on the East Africa coast, with its long history of Islam. This includes prominently a view as to how this relates or is integral to the larger Indian Ocean world. Swahili language and its genres have been shaped in relation to, and in context of, transregional interaction with other languages and traditions that carry influence, and significance for the coastal residents. Ideas, thoughts, arguments and verse are taken on, adapted, mediated and disseminated flexibly by Swahili speakers through language repertoires and (mostly poetic) genres in changing media. These range from oral performances and handwritten manuscripts to booklets, CD recordings, radio programs and social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.12725","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47376157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In Capital and Ideology, Thomas Piketty takes a highly structured approach to the history of inequality in human societies. Much depends on this approach, notably the book's temporal and geographical ambitions and its bold and provocative claims, but by exploring how Piketty constructs his ‘big history’ of inequality regimes we can see there is loss as well as gain. Focussing on the history of early modern Europe, which features prominently in Piketty's book, I suggest that our grasp of movement and, relatedly, of change and continuity in inequality regimes, suffers in his account. There is ample scope, therefore, for historians to enhance our understanding of the history of the ideologies and institutions from which Piketty's inequality regimes are constituted. Enriching the historical study of inequality regimes that Piketty proposes in Capital and Ideology might be seen as a polite form of interdisciplinary exchange but I suggest that a more 'muscular' interdisciplinary engagement around his book may be more promising still. Especially interesting in this regard would be efforts to both challenge the explanatory analysis that Piketty develops in Capital and Ideology and to develop microscopic analyses of inequality alongside the macroscopic approach that Piketty employs.
{"title":"Constructing a big history of inequality","authors":"Mary O’Sullivan","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12719","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12719","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In <i>Capital and Ideology</i>, Thomas Piketty takes a highly structured approach to the history of inequality in human societies. Much depends on this approach, notably the book's temporal and geographical ambitions and its bold and provocative claims, but by exploring how Piketty constructs his ‘big history’ of inequality regimes we can see there is loss as well as gain. Focussing on the history of early modern Europe, which features prominently in Piketty's book, I suggest that our grasp of movement and, relatedly, of change and continuity in inequality regimes, suffers in his account. There is ample scope, therefore, for historians to enhance our understanding of the history of the ideologies and institutions from which Piketty's inequality regimes are constituted. Enriching the historical study of inequality regimes that Piketty proposes in <i>Capital and Ideology</i> might be seen as a polite form of interdisciplinary exchange but I suggest that a more 'muscular' interdisciplinary engagement around his book may be more promising still. Especially interesting in this regard would be efforts to both challenge the explanatory analysis that Piketty develops in <i>Capital and Ideology</i> and to develop microscopic analyses of inequality alongside the macroscopic approach that Piketty employs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.12719","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48584130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article explores the use of textual sources in Thomas Piketty's Capital and Ideology as seriously as others have examined Piketty's use of statistics. Although a commendable attempt to engage with non-quantitative sources, the book focuses on elite novels, selects works unsystematically, and takes an old-fashioned approach to media. Ironically, Piketty's use of literature perpetuates the same focus on the upper classes that he wishes to guard against. In this response, I suggest how a book on capital and ideology might examine novels and newspapers rigorously. First, I look at how a broader understanding of literary production as a business and a focus on non-elite books might inform the use of novels. Second, I consider how to employ big-data techniques to study newspapers. Overall, I argue, taking novels and newspapers seriously shows the importance of non-elite sources and of incorporating big-data techniques often pioneered by literary scholars.
{"title":"Novels and newspapers in Piketty's Capital and Ideology","authors":"Heidi Tworek","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12720","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12720","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the use of textual sources in Thomas Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> as seriously as others have examined Piketty's use of statistics. Although a commendable attempt to engage with non-quantitative sources, the book focuses on elite novels, selects works unsystematically, and takes an old-fashioned approach to media. Ironically, Piketty's use of literature perpetuates the same focus on the upper classes that he wishes to guard against. In this response, I suggest how a book on capital and ideology might examine novels and newspapers rigorously. First, I look at how a broader understanding of literary production as a business and a focus on non-elite books might inform the use of novels. Second, I consider how to employ big-data techniques to study newspapers. Overall, I argue, taking novels and newspapers seriously shows the importance of non-elite sources and of incorporating big-data techniques often pioneered by literary scholars.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42335906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay considers Piketty's characterization of U.S. economic development in Capital and Ideology in the decades between 1860 and 1900, a period that historians have begun to call the “Second Great Divergence.” It contends that Piketty's characterization of this period rests on outdated assumptions about the relationship between economic development and political contestation, and that Piketty's neglect of historical writing on this topic raises questions about his policy proposals. To highlight the limitations of Piketty's approach, it includes case studies of the telegraph industry and the telephone industry. For all of its erudition, range, and literary panache, Piketty's Capital and Ideology is, at its most persuasive, an updated restatement for a twenty-first century audience of the Polanyian critique of nineteenth-century economic liberalism. This is a worthy project, yet it is less novel in its conception and more problematic in its execution than might at first appear.
{"title":"Political contestation and the Second Great Divergence","authors":"Richard R. John","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12722","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12722","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay considers Piketty's characterization of U.S. economic development in <i>Capital and Ideology</i> in the decades between 1860 and 1900, a period that historians have begun to call the “Second Great Divergence.” It contends that Piketty's characterization of this period rests on outdated assumptions about the relationship between economic development and political contestation, and that Piketty's neglect of historical writing on this topic raises questions about his policy proposals. To highlight the limitations of Piketty's approach, it includes case studies of the telegraph industry and the telephone industry. For all of its erudition, range, and literary panache, Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> is, at its most persuasive, an updated restatement for a twenty-first century audience of the Polanyian critique of nineteenth-century economic liberalism. This is a worthy project, yet it is less novel in its conception and more problematic in its execution than might at first appear.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42189476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>This review essay on economist Thomas Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> argues that the role of financial professionals as ideologues is a necessary yet missing component of Piketty's analysis. Using the history of capitalism in the United States as a connective thread, the essay synthesizes examples from a broad array of studies to trace the role of financial professionals from the counting houses of early republic New Orleans and New York through the professionalization of stockbrokers and investment bankers in the late-19th century Gilded Age to modern-day Wall Street white-collar workers. Throughout U.S. history financial professionals and their allied media institutions have been ubiquitous and essential advocates for a “proprietarian” ideology which prioritizes the sanctity of property rights over ameliorating inequality.</p><p>Thomas Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> offers a sprawling history of how conditions of economic inequality advance or constrain human progress. Casting aside arguments that economic growth lifts all boats, Piketty urges looking instead to political and ideological structures for a robust explanation of social development. The book's 17 chapters seek to establish a unified theory of social evolution at the nation-state level, developing a chronology and a terminology that proceeds from “ternary” systems of nobles, clerics, and peasants (a model Piketty fits to medieval and early modern societies from Western Europe to Japan) through the bourgeois capitalist regimes established in the eighteenth century and the social-democratic societies that arose in the wake of World War I, finally ending in a present-day surge in oligarchic populism that decries inequality while doing little, he argues, to reverse it. Particularly tragic, in Piketty's eyes, is that in recent history this shift has been accompanied by a “distinctive” meritocratic ideology which “blame[s] the poor for their poverty.” (Piketty, <span>2020</span>, p. 710) Given Piketty's sociopolitical goals, <i>Capital and Ideology</i>'s political vision suffers from often being free of ideologues. I argue that we might fill this gap by examining financial sector professionals as critical actors in establishing and defending “inequality regimes” (as Piketty terms them) throughout the past two centuries. Tracing the ideological work of financial professionals' in the United States from the early republic forward, I suggest we might discover fruitful continuities linking the development of new systems of capitalist knowledge in the Age of Revolutions with the social role of the present-day meritocracy.<sup>1</sup></p><p>While Piketty's earlier book <i>Capital in the Twenty-First Century</i> was built on the argument that unregulated capitalism “automatically generates arbitrary and unsustainable inequalities,” (Piketty, <span>2014</span>, p. 1) the villain of the sequel is not capitalism per se but “proprietarian” ideology, a way of making sense of the worl
这篇对经济学家托马斯•皮凯蒂(Thomas Piketty)的《资本与意识形态》(Capital and Ideology)的评论文章认为,金融专业人士作为意识形态家的角色是皮凯蒂分析中必要但缺失的组成部分。本文以美国资本主义的历史为线索,综合了大量研究中的例子,追溯了金融专业人士的角色,从共和初期新奥尔良和纽约的会计室,到19世纪末镀金时代股票经纪人和投资银行家的专业化,再到现代华尔街白领。纵观美国历史,金融专业人士和他们的盟友媒体机构一直是“专有权”意识形态的普遍倡导者,这种意识形态将财产权的神圣性置于改善不平等之上。托马斯·皮凯蒂(Thomas Piketty)的《资本论与意识形态》(Capital and Ideology)讲述了经济不平等状况如何推动或限制人类进步的漫长历史。撇开经济增长能提升所有人的观点,皮凯蒂敦促人们从政治和意识形态结构中寻找对社会发展的有力解释。这本书的17章试图在民族国家层面建立一个统一的社会进化理论,发展了一个时序和术语,从贵族、神职人员和农民的“三元”体系(皮凯蒂适合于从中世纪和早期现代社会,从西欧到日本)开始,通过18世纪建立的资产阶级资本主义政权和第一次世界大战后兴起的社会民主主义社会,他认为,最终的结果是如今寡头民粹主义的激增,这种民粹主义谴责不平等,却几乎没有采取任何措施来扭转这种不平等。在皮凯蒂看来,尤其悲惨的是,在近代史上,这种转变伴随着一种“独特的”精英主义意识形态,这种意识形态“将穷人的贫穷归咎于穷人”。(皮凯蒂,2020年,第710页)鉴于皮凯蒂的社会政治目标,《资本论与意识形态》的政治愿景往往缺乏意识形态家。我认为,我们或许可以通过考察金融业专业人士在过去两个世纪中建立和捍卫“不平等制度”(皮凯蒂称之为“不平等制度”)的关键角色,来填补这一空白。从共和国早期开始追踪美国金融专业人士的意识形态工作,我认为我们可能会发现革命时代资本主义知识新体系的发展与当今精英政治的社会角色之间富有成效的连续性。虽然皮凯蒂的早期著作《21世纪资本论》是建立在不受管制的资本主义“自动产生任意和不可持续的不平等”的论点之上的(皮凯蒂,2014年,第1页),续集的恶人不是资本主义本身,而是“所有制”意识形态,这是一种理解世界和塑造特定政治制度的方式,以证明这些不平等的正当性,其第一个前提是“财产权的神圣化”。正如在新书的简短词汇表(1044)中所解释的那样。本书的第一部分追溯了世界上许多地方的政治争论的悠久传统,这些争论致力于驳斥精英在社会契约下对整个政体负有独特责任的观点。《资本论与意识形态》的第三部分描述了“大转型”,即面对第一次世界大战和大萧条,大多数北大西洋民主国家放弃了19世纪的自由主义变体,随后从20世纪70年代开始,在新自由主义的支持下,不平等稳步回归。如今,皮凯蒂担心的是,一种更恶毒的“市场本土主义”(market native - vism)可能会发展成一种利用仇外心理来削弱再分配政策的吸引力,同时巩固有利于现有财富的税收制度。在最后几章中,皮凯蒂试图论证,只有“对私人资本的特殊税收”才能为社会民主主义的复兴提供资金,并确保进步(886-891)。换句话说,皮凯蒂感兴趣的是资本——无论是通过所有权获得对经济产出的控制权,还是以这些产出的(通常是货币化的)回报(而不是资本主义)为代表——产生这些回报和所有权结构的榨取、谈判、强制和合作体系(Levy, 2017)。皮凯蒂特别关注法国历史,以研究收入不平等与产权保护之间的相互关系。在第四章中,他提出了一个违反直觉的论点,即法国大革命尽管推翻了君主制和拥有土地的贵族,但通过将所有权(尤其是土地所有权)从民事权力中分离出来,使财产关系比以往任何时候都更加牢固,从而增强了“现代财产权”的合法性。 (105)取消“特权和收费”和“建立对不同职业和财产权的平等机会”被认为足以确保一个平等社会的理想目标(118)。然而,这个国家最大的财富来源的变化,以及通过税法重新分配国家繁荣的政治压力的缺失,意味着到19世纪晚期,收入不平等已经上升到革命前的水平。尽管如此,第三共和国的政治家们坚持认为法国是“一个‘小农’的国家”(139)是很重要的,但皮凯蒂对收入和财产的详细定量研究表明,从1780年到1910年,法国最贫穷的90%人口的财富分配几乎没有变化,他们的累积总额很少超过收入的50%或财产的20%(130-131)。在将焦点从资本主义转移到财产的过程中,皮凯蒂试图追溯意识形态争论的更长的历史,即资本主义创造的社会条件可以通过由此产生的财产分配来证明是合理的。皮凯蒂将意识形态描述为自上而下“强加意义的企图”。为了研究意识形态,他专注于正式的政治演讲,在政党纲领和政府辩论中发现;他还求助于“理论家和政治行动者,看看不平等是如何被证明是合理的。”(14)在第11章(书中最长的一章)中,他最关注的是那些在20世纪中期在西方民主国家取得胜利的“不完全平等”政权的先锋政党,从德国社会民主党到美国民主党,再到斯堪的纳维亚的工人政党(486-508)。皮凯蒂显然更同情这些政治团体,并且似乎对民主党的转变着迷,例如,民主党从一个由南方奴隶主主导的政党,转变为通过新政取代工业所有制社会不平等制度的工具,最终转变为一个“婆罗门左派”政党,被认定为“为受过高等教育的人服务,而不是为弱势群体服务”。”(834)。然而,这种关注焦点的选择意味着,人们在很大程度上忽略了对资产阶级意识形态在日常生活中造成的不平等状况的关注,以及对这些状况如何将一个广泛的支持者联盟凝聚在一起的关注。皮凯蒂的使命是推翻普选社会中的不平等现象,缺乏这种分析似乎是其中的一个重要缺陷。在书的最后,他概述了一种新的“参与式社会主义”(1016-1022),通过政府行动以及劳动力关系、司法系统和全球机构的变革来推翻普遍存在的不平等制度。分析所谓的“业主”联盟是如何组成的,似乎是一项重要的任务,以确定什么样的政治条件可能推翻业主意识形态。如果不了解优先保护少数精英的财富和特权的政治运动是如何组织更大的追随者的,皮凯蒂的政治使命似乎很可能会失败。换句话说,为业主联盟建立政治力量和动力取决于意识形态。我认为,如果我们把注意力集中在调解全球和地方交易的金融专业人士和职员身上,我们就能找到这些理论家,他们对皮凯蒂的论点非常重要。所谓“金融专业人士”,我指的是各种各样的演员,如破产律师事务所的律师,开发新文学流派以吸引潜在投资者的股票经纪人,促进国际房地产开发计划并开创当地住房市场的房地产经纪人,以及创造证券化金融新形式的抵押贷款银行家(Coffee, 2006;Glotzer, 2020;Hornstein, 2005;海曼,2011;骑士,2016;奥特,2011;斯基尔,2001)。金融专业人士的生计依赖于财产方面的创新:他们不断开发新的工具来代表对财产的债权,以及谈判、核实和主张这些债权的新方法。自身利益驱使他们成为业主联盟的先锋。金融专业人士对无形服务和抽象可转让票据交易费用收入的依赖,反而强化了他们对自营意识形态的忠诚。资产阶级意识形态对金融专业人士的吸引力可以追溯到大西洋世界资产阶级资本主义的信息问题。奴隶种植园的缺席所有权、长途贸易关系和跨区域土地开发计划都要求投资
{"title":"Financial professionals and the formation of proprietarian ideology","authors":"Atiba Pertilla","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12717","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12717","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This review essay on economist Thomas Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> argues that the role of financial professionals as ideologues is a necessary yet missing component of Piketty's analysis. Using the history of capitalism in the United States as a connective thread, the essay synthesizes examples from a broad array of studies to trace the role of financial professionals from the counting houses of early republic New Orleans and New York through the professionalization of stockbrokers and investment bankers in the late-19th century Gilded Age to modern-day Wall Street white-collar workers. Throughout U.S. history financial professionals and their allied media institutions have been ubiquitous and essential advocates for a “proprietarian” ideology which prioritizes the sanctity of property rights over ameliorating inequality.</p><p>Thomas Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> offers a sprawling history of how conditions of economic inequality advance or constrain human progress. Casting aside arguments that economic growth lifts all boats, Piketty urges looking instead to political and ideological structures for a robust explanation of social development. The book's 17 chapters seek to establish a unified theory of social evolution at the nation-state level, developing a chronology and a terminology that proceeds from “ternary” systems of nobles, clerics, and peasants (a model Piketty fits to medieval and early modern societies from Western Europe to Japan) through the bourgeois capitalist regimes established in the eighteenth century and the social-democratic societies that arose in the wake of World War I, finally ending in a present-day surge in oligarchic populism that decries inequality while doing little, he argues, to reverse it. Particularly tragic, in Piketty's eyes, is that in recent history this shift has been accompanied by a “distinctive” meritocratic ideology which “blame[s] the poor for their poverty.” (Piketty, <span>2020</span>, p. 710) Given Piketty's sociopolitical goals, <i>Capital and Ideology</i>'s political vision suffers from often being free of ideologues. I argue that we might fill this gap by examining financial sector professionals as critical actors in establishing and defending “inequality regimes” (as Piketty terms them) throughout the past two centuries. Tracing the ideological work of financial professionals' in the United States from the early republic forward, I suggest we might discover fruitful continuities linking the development of new systems of capitalist knowledge in the Age of Revolutions with the social role of the present-day meritocracy.<sup>1</sup></p><p>While Piketty's earlier book <i>Capital in the Twenty-First Century</i> was built on the argument that unregulated capitalism “automatically generates arbitrary and unsustainable inequalities,” (Piketty, <span>2014</span>, p. 1) the villain of the sequel is not capitalism per se but “proprietarian” ideology, a way of making sense of the worl","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.12717","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46986345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article engages Thomas Piketty's Capital and Ideology from the perspective of the human body and public health. It explores how Piketty's account could be enriched by examining how economic inequality produces physiological inequity and how human health is essential to understanding the intractability of capitalist crises.
{"title":"Embodied capital in the history of inequality","authors":"Johan Mathew","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12721","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12721","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article engages Thomas Piketty's <i>Capital and Ideology</i> from the perspective of the human body and public health. It explores how Piketty's account could be enriched by examining how economic inequality produces physiological inequity and how human health is essential to understanding the intractability of capitalist crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41895776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay introduces this forum on Thomas Piketty's Capitalism and Ideology. We outline the debates that emerge from a joint reading of the six contributions to the forum. In doing so we assess the importance of Piketty's contribution to historical debates on capitalism, ideology, and inequality and consider how historians might respond to the challenges Piketty presents.
{"title":"Piketty amongst the historians: Introduction to a symposium on Thomas Piketty's Capital and Ideology","authors":"Jonathan Coopersmith, Andrew Popp","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12724","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hic3.12724","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay introduces this forum on Thomas Piketty's <i>Capitalism and Ideology.</i> We outline the debates that emerge from a joint reading of the six contributions to the forum. In doing so we assess the importance of Piketty's contribution to historical debates on capitalism, ideology, and inequality and consider how historians might respond to the challenges Piketty presents.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.12724","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44394362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}