Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-03DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024047
Mehmet Süleyman Abul, Aytunç Metin, Ömer Faruk Sevim, Ömer Hekim, Engin Eceviz
Objective: Intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF), more so reverse oblique fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3), are the most challenging clinically, with significant morbidity and mortality. Early stable fixation should be achieved to allow early mobilization and reduce complications. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of three Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) techniques - PFN alone, Cable + PFN, and Monocortical reconstruction plate (MRP) + PFN- in managing reverse oblique ITFF, to determine the most ideal of them.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 106 patients treated from 2015 to 2022. The patients were classified by the surgical intervention: Cable + PFN (n = 37), MRP + PFN (n = 29), and PFN (n = 40). The critical parameters analyzed included healing time, quality of reduction, rates of complications, and functional outcomes of Trendelenburg gait.
Results: The bone healing time was significantly faster in the Cable + PFN group and MRP + PFN group as compared to the PFN group, 4.43 ± 0.92 and 4.44 ± 0.90 months versus 6.40 ± 2.41 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared with the PFN group, the number of cases with Trendelenburg gait in the Cable + PFN group was significantly lower, 10.8%. The number of patients showing the Trendelenburg gait trended lower in the MRP + PFN group but was insignificant (p = 0.075). Radiological outcomes did not differ significantly among the groups.
Conclusion: The use of Cable + PFN and MRP + PFN techniques has superior outcomes with earlier bone union and far less incidence of Trendelenburg gait than PFN alone. These findings can help hint that perhaps the usage of cables and recon plates enhances the stability and functional restoration in patients who have sustained reverse oblique ITFF.
{"title":"How would you like your proximal femoral nail - with a monocortical recon plate, with cable, or neat? A functional and radiological study of reverse oblique (AO/OTA 31-A3) intertrochanteric femur fractures.","authors":"Mehmet Süleyman Abul, Aytunç Metin, Ömer Faruk Sevim, Ömer Hekim, Engin Eceviz","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024047","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF), more so reverse oblique fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3), are the most challenging clinically, with significant morbidity and mortality. Early stable fixation should be achieved to allow early mobilization and reduce complications. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of three Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) techniques - PFN alone, Cable + PFN, and Monocortical reconstruction plate (MRP) + PFN- in managing reverse oblique ITFF, to determine the most ideal of them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 106 patients treated from 2015 to 2022. The patients were classified by the surgical intervention: Cable + PFN (n = 37), MRP + PFN (n = 29), and PFN (n = 40). The critical parameters analyzed included healing time, quality of reduction, rates of complications, and functional outcomes of Trendelenburg gait.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bone healing time was significantly faster in the Cable + PFN group and MRP + PFN group as compared to the PFN group, 4.43 ± 0.92 and 4.44 ± 0.90 months versus 6.40 ± 2.41 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared with the PFN group, the number of cases with Trendelenburg gait in the Cable + PFN group was significantly lower, 10.8%. The number of patients showing the Trendelenburg gait trended lower in the MRP + PFN group but was insignificant (p = 0.075). Radiological outcomes did not differ significantly among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of Cable + PFN and MRP + PFN techniques has superior outcomes with earlier bone union and far less incidence of Trendelenburg gait than PFN alone. These findings can help hint that perhaps the usage of cables and recon plates enhances the stability and functional restoration in patients who have sustained reverse oblique ITFF.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613634/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024017
Esfandiar Chahidi, Sagi Martinov, Filip Simion, Camille Mercier, Liam Sabot, Theofylaktos Kyriakydis, Antoine Callewier, Jacques Hernigou
Purpose: Controversy exists on the best fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Non-cemented fixation has been theorized to improve patient outcomes and longevity of implantation but no study has focused on comparison between cemented or cementless posterior-stabilized implants despite being the most commonly or second most frequently utilized implant in most total knee replacement registries.
Methods: Inclusion criteria with observational and interventional papers, and review articles that focused on patients with cementless and cemented PS TKAs were used to analyze outcomes such as implant survivorship, complication, or revision rates. Using a combination of keywords, a systematic search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library for Meta-Analysis.
Results: When using the specified criteria, only 8 studies were selected for full-text analysis and meta-analysis after eliminating screening duplicates, titles, and abstracts without full-text access. These eight studies contain 1652 patients, 693 in the non-cemented Group, and 959 in the cemented total knee prosthesis Group. The meta-analysis revealed the advantage of cementless fixation over cemented fixation in implant survivorship, with 0.6% and 2.6% of aseptic loosening in each Group. The cumulative survival at 12 years was 97.4% for the cementless Group and 89.2% for the cemented Group. The subgroup with a stem showed a positive outcome for cementless fixation over cemented fixation regarding implant survivorship. No differences between the cemented and cementless TKAs were observed in patient-reported outcomes, revision rates, or radiolucent line development.
Conclusion: We observed comparable rates for cemented and cementless posterior-stabilized TKAs over a medium-term follow-up period.
{"title":"Survivorship and complications of cementless compared to cemented posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Esfandiar Chahidi, Sagi Martinov, Filip Simion, Camille Mercier, Liam Sabot, Theofylaktos Kyriakydis, Antoine Callewier, Jacques Hernigou","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024017","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Controversy exists on the best fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Non-cemented fixation has been theorized to improve patient outcomes and longevity of implantation but no study has focused on comparison between cemented or cementless posterior-stabilized implants despite being the most commonly or second most frequently utilized implant in most total knee replacement registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria with observational and interventional papers, and review articles that focused on patients with cementless and cemented PS TKAs were used to analyze outcomes such as implant survivorship, complication, or revision rates. Using a combination of keywords, a systematic search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library for Meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using the specified criteria, only 8 studies were selected for full-text analysis and meta-analysis after eliminating screening duplicates, titles, and abstracts without full-text access. These eight studies contain 1652 patients, 693 in the non-cemented Group, and 959 in the cemented total knee prosthesis Group. The meta-analysis revealed the advantage of cementless fixation over cemented fixation in implant survivorship, with 0.6% and 2.6% of aseptic loosening in each Group. The cumulative survival at 12 years was 97.4% for the cementless Group and 89.2% for the cemented Group. The subgroup with a stem showed a positive outcome for cementless fixation over cemented fixation regarding implant survivorship. No differences between the cemented and cementless TKAs were observed in patient-reported outcomes, revision rates, or radiolucent line development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed comparable rates for cemented and cementless posterior-stabilized TKAs over a medium-term follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141522/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141180111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-15DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024003
Vasileios Giovanoulis, Eustathios Kenanidis, Florence Aïm, Zakareya Gamie, Simon Marmor, Michael Potoupnis, Sébastien Lustig, Eleftherios Tsiridis
Introduction: This systematic review aims to critically assess the literature comparative studies investigating collared and collarless Corail stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to find differences in revision rates, radiographic and clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications between these two types of the same stem.
Methods: Eligible studies were found by searching PubMed, Science Direct/Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from conception till May 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The investigation encompassed randomized controlled trials, case series, comparative, cohort, and observational studies that assessed at least one comparative outcome or complication between collared and collarless Corail stems.
Results: Twelve comparative studies with 90,626 patients undergoing primary THA were included. There were 40,441 collared and 58,543 collarless stems. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 360 months. Our study demonstrated no significant difference in stem revision relative risk (RR = 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23, 2.02; p = 0.49), number of radiolucent lines (RR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.06, 2.28; p = 0.29) and overall complication risk (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22, 1.76; p = 0.37) between collared and collarless stems. The collared stems demonstrated significantly lesser subsidence (mean difference: 1.01 mm; 95% CI, -1.77, -0.25; p = 0.009) and risk of periprosthetic fractures (RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.92; p = 0.03).
Conclusion: The comparative studies between collared and collarless stem groups showed similar survival and overall complication rates and functional outcomes. The similar revision rates between groups make the impact of higher subsidence for collarless stems uncertain. The lower risk of periprosthetic fractures in the collared stems group must be clarified further but could be related to increased rotational stability.
{"title":"Collared versus collarless hydroxyapatite-coated stems for primary cementless total hip arthroplasty; a systematic review of comparative studies. Is there any difference in survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes?","authors":"Vasileios Giovanoulis, Eustathios Kenanidis, Florence Aïm, Zakareya Gamie, Simon Marmor, Michael Potoupnis, Sébastien Lustig, Eleftherios Tsiridis","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024003","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to critically assess the literature comparative studies investigating collared and collarless Corail stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to find differences in revision rates, radiographic and clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications between these two types of the same stem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies were found by searching PubMed, Science Direct/Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from conception till May 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The investigation encompassed randomized controlled trials, case series, comparative, cohort, and observational studies that assessed at least one comparative outcome or complication between collared and collarless Corail stems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve comparative studies with 90,626 patients undergoing primary THA were included. There were 40,441 collared and 58,543 collarless stems. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 360 months. Our study demonstrated no significant difference in stem revision relative risk (RR = 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23, 2.02; p = 0.49), number of radiolucent lines (RR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.06, 2.28; p = 0.29) and overall complication risk (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22, 1.76; p = 0.37) between collared and collarless stems. The collared stems demonstrated significantly lesser subsidence (mean difference: 1.01 mm; 95% CI, -1.77, -0.25; p = 0.009) and risk of periprosthetic fractures (RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.92; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparative studies between collared and collarless stem groups showed similar survival and overall complication rates and functional outcomes. The similar revision rates between groups make the impact of higher subsidence for collarless stems uncertain. The lower risk of periprosthetic fractures in the collared stems group must be clarified further but could be related to increased rotational stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868518/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139736342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: This study aimed to systematically review the literature and identify the surgical management strategy for fixed flexion contracture in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery, pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. Secondary endpoints were etiologies and factors favoring flexion contracture.
Materials and methods: Searches were carried out in November 2023 in several databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) using the following keywords: "flexion contracture AND TKA", "fixed flexion deformity AND TKA", "posterior capsular release AND TKA", "posterior capsulotomy in TKA", "distal femoral resection AND TKA". Study quality was assessed using the STROBE checklist and the Downs and Black score. Data concerning factors or strategies leading to the development or prevention of flexion contracture after TKA were extracted from the text, figures, and tables of the included references. The effect of each predictive factor on flexion contracture after TKA was recorded.
Results: Thirty-one studies were identified to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies described a variety of preoperative and intraoperative factors that contribute to the development or correction of postoperative flexion contracture. The only clearly identified predictor of postoperative flexion contracture was preoperative flexion contracture. Intraoperative steps described to correct flexion contracture were: soft-tissue balancing (in posterior and medial compartments), distal femoral resection, flexion of the femoral component, and posterior condylar resection. However, no study has investigated these factors in a global model.
Discussion: This review identified various pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors predictive of post-operative flexion contracture. In practice, these factors are likely to interact, and it is therefore crucial to further investigate them in a comprehensive model to develop an algorithm for the management of flexion contracture.
{"title":"Management of fixed flexion contracture in primary total knee arthroplasty: recent systematic review.","authors":"Elliot Sappey-Marinier, Andréa Fernandez, Jobe Shatrov, Cécile Batailler, Elvire Servien, Denis Huten, Sébastien Lustig","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024007","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review the literature and identify the surgical management strategy for fixed flexion contracture in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery, pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. Secondary endpoints were etiologies and factors favoring flexion contracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Searches were carried out in November 2023 in several databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) using the following keywords: \"flexion contracture AND TKA\", \"fixed flexion deformity AND TKA\", \"posterior capsular release AND TKA\", \"posterior capsulotomy in TKA\", \"distal femoral resection AND TKA\". Study quality was assessed using the STROBE checklist and the Downs and Black score. Data concerning factors or strategies leading to the development or prevention of flexion contracture after TKA were extracted from the text, figures, and tables of the included references. The effect of each predictive factor on flexion contracture after TKA was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies were identified to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies described a variety of preoperative and intraoperative factors that contribute to the development or correction of postoperative flexion contracture. The only clearly identified predictor of postoperative flexion contracture was preoperative flexion contracture. Intraoperative steps described to correct flexion contracture were: soft-tissue balancing (in posterior and medial compartments), distal femoral resection, flexion of the femoral component, and posterior condylar resection. However, no study has investigated these factors in a global model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review identified various pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors predictive of post-operative flexion contracture. In practice, these factors are likely to interact, and it is therefore crucial to further investigate them in a comprehensive model to develop an algorithm for the management of flexion contracture.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964851/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140289203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-16DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024013
Vincent Maes, David Cossetto
Background: Correct acetabular component placement plays a critical role in reducing early revisions after dislocations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) guides anteversion, inclination can only be accurately guided by navigation. In order to overcome the initial disadvantages with navigation, an imageless, easy-to-use inertial navigation system has been recently introduced. This study aims to analyze the accuracy of inclination with this navigation system compared to the standard manual technique.
Methods: Two cohorts, manual technique (MT) and navigation (NAV) cohorts, consisted of 83 and 95 patients, respectively, after exclusion criteria were applied. Inclination target was 38° and anteversion was guided by TAL. Demographic data were collected, and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs were obtained 6 weeks post-operatively. Inclination and anteversion were determined on the AP pelvic and cross-table lateral radiograph, respectively.
Results: A mean inclination of 41.8° (±6.8°) and 38.9° (±4.4°) was found in the MT and NAV cohorts, respectively. There was no statistical difference in gender, age, and BMI. If the inclination was set within 10° of the target (i.e., 38°), 88% of the MT cohort and 97% of the NAV cohort were within the target zone. Accuracy decreased to 53% and 83%, respectively, if the target zone range was narrowed down to ± 5°.
Conclusion: Combining inertial imageless navigation for inclination and TAL as a landmark for anteversion is significantly more accurate compared to the manual technique, without having the limitations and disadvantages of current standard navigational techniques.
背景:在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,正确的髋臼组件放置对于减少脱位后的早期翻修起着至关重要的作用。虽然髋臼横韧带(TAL)可引导前倾,但只有通过导航才能准确引导倾斜。为了克服导航最初的缺点,最近推出了一种无图像、易于使用的惯性导航系统。本研究旨在分析该导航系统与标准手动技术相比的倾角准确性:采用排除标准后,手动技术(MT)和导航(NAV)两组分别由 83 名和 95 名患者组成。倾角目标为 38°,内翻由 TAL 引导。收集了患者的人口统计学数据,并在术后6周拍摄了骨盆前方(AP)和跨台侧位X光片。根据 AP 骨盆和跨台侧位X光片分别确定倾斜度和前内翻:MT组和NAV组的平均倾角分别为41.8°(±6.8°)和38.9°(±4.4°)。在性别、年龄和体重指数方面没有统计学差异。如果将倾角设定在目标值的 10°以内(即 38°),88% 的 MT 队列和 97% 的 NAV 队列都在目标区域内。如果将目标区域范围缩小到 ± 5°,准确率则分别降至 53% 和 83%:结论:与手动技术相比,结合惯性无图像导航进行倾斜和以 TAL 为地标进行内翻的准确性明显更高,但却没有当前标准导航技术的局限性和缺点。
{"title":"Combining inertial navigation with transacetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach results in excellent accuracy compared to standard manual technique - A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Vincent Maes, David Cossetto","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correct acetabular component placement plays a critical role in reducing early revisions after dislocations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) guides anteversion, inclination can only be accurately guided by navigation. In order to overcome the initial disadvantages with navigation, an imageless, easy-to-use inertial navigation system has been recently introduced. This study aims to analyze the accuracy of inclination with this navigation system compared to the standard manual technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cohorts, manual technique (MT) and navigation (NAV) cohorts, consisted of 83 and 95 patients, respectively, after exclusion criteria were applied. Inclination target was 38° and anteversion was guided by TAL. Demographic data were collected, and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs were obtained 6 weeks post-operatively. Inclination and anteversion were determined on the AP pelvic and cross-table lateral radiograph, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean inclination of 41.8° (±6.8°) and 38.9° (±4.4°) was found in the MT and NAV cohorts, respectively. There was no statistical difference in gender, age, and BMI. If the inclination was set within 10° of the target (i.e., 38°), 88% of the MT cohort and 97% of the NAV cohort were within the target zone. Accuracy decreased to 53% and 83%, respectively, if the target zone range was narrowed down to ± 5°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining inertial imageless navigation for inclination and TAL as a landmark for anteversion is significantly more accurate compared to the manual technique, without having the limitations and disadvantages of current standard navigational techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101203/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140961486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024044
Elena Chiara Thalia Georgiakakis, Akib Majed Khan, Kartik Logishetty, Khaled Maher Sarraf
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopaedic care has gained considerable interest in recent years, evidenced by the growing body of literature boasting wide-ranging applications across the perioperative setting. This includes automated diagnostic imaging, clinical decision-making tools, optimisation of implant design, robotic surgery, and remote patient monitoring. Collectively, these advances propose to enhance patient care and improve system efficiency. Musculoskeletal pathologies represent the most significant contributor to global disability, with roughly 1.71 billion people afflicted, leading to an increasing volume of patients awaiting planned orthopaedic surgeries. This has exerted a considerable strain on healthcare systems globally, compounded by both the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of an ageing population. Subsequently, patients face prolonged waiting times for surgery, with further deterioration and potentially poorer outcomes as a result. Furthermore, incorporating AI technologies into clinical practice could provide a means of addressing current and future service demands. This review aims to present a clear overview of AI applications across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages to elucidate its potential to transform planned orthopaedic care.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in planned orthopaedic care.","authors":"Elena Chiara Thalia Georgiakakis, Akib Majed Khan, Kartik Logishetty, Khaled Maher Sarraf","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024044","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopaedic care has gained considerable interest in recent years, evidenced by the growing body of literature boasting wide-ranging applications across the perioperative setting. This includes automated diagnostic imaging, clinical decision-making tools, optimisation of implant design, robotic surgery, and remote patient monitoring. Collectively, these advances propose to enhance patient care and improve system efficiency. Musculoskeletal pathologies represent the most significant contributor to global disability, with roughly 1.71 billion people afflicted, leading to an increasing volume of patients awaiting planned orthopaedic surgeries. This has exerted a considerable strain on healthcare systems globally, compounded by both the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of an ageing population. Subsequently, patients face prolonged waiting times for surgery, with further deterioration and potentially poorer outcomes as a result. Furthermore, incorporating AI technologies into clinical practice could provide a means of addressing current and future service demands. This review aims to present a clear overview of AI applications across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages to elucidate its potential to transform planned orthopaedic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580622/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024049
Erik Schiffner, Dominique Schoeps, Christos Koukos, Felix Lakomek, Joachim Windolf, David Latz
Introduction: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the impact of kick-off time on the risk of injury for professional soccer players in the first German Bundesliga. It was hypothesized that late kick-off times would have a negative effect on muscle and ligament injuries to the ankle and knee.
Methods: Kick-off times and injury data were collected over 5 consecutive seasons (1530 matches; 2014-2019) from two media-based registries (transfermarkt.de® und kicker.de®). The kick-off times were assorted into three groups: Afternoon kick-off between prior to 3:30 pm (988 matches), evening kick-off between 5:30 to 6:30 pm (303 matches), and night kick-off after 8 pm (239 matches).
Results: A total of 1327 match injuries were recorded over 5 seasons in 510 different male elite soccer players. The injuries affected muscles in 32.1%, ankle ligaments in 7.8%, and knee ligaments in 5.6%. There was no significant difference in injury rates when comparing different kick-off time groups (p > 0.05), however, the mean of time attributed to muscle and ankle ligament injuries suffered in games with a late kick-off time was significantly longer (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: This study shows that there is no significant (p > 0.05) association between three different kick-off time groups and injury risk in the first German Bundesliga. However, significant (p < 0.05) differences in the lay-off times attributed to muscle and ankle ligament injuries differed with different kick-off times assorted into the three groups. Reasons for this observation could be found in the circadian muscle rhythms and muscle fatigue.
{"title":"Afternoon kick-off, evening kick-off, or night kick-off in the first German Bundesliga - A possible Injury risk factor?","authors":"Erik Schiffner, Dominique Schoeps, Christos Koukos, Felix Lakomek, Joachim Windolf, David Latz","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024049","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the impact of kick-off time on the risk of injury for professional soccer players in the first German Bundesliga. It was hypothesized that late kick-off times would have a negative effect on muscle and ligament injuries to the ankle and knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kick-off times and injury data were collected over 5 consecutive seasons (1530 matches; 2014-2019) from two media-based registries (transfermarkt.de<sup>®</sup> und kicker.de<sup>®</sup>). The kick-off times were assorted into three groups: Afternoon kick-off between prior to 3:30 pm (988 matches), evening kick-off between 5:30 to 6:30 pm (303 matches), and night kick-off after 8 pm (239 matches).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1327 match injuries were recorded over 5 seasons in 510 different male elite soccer players. The injuries affected muscles in 32.1%, ankle ligaments in 7.8%, and knee ligaments in 5.6%. There was no significant difference in injury rates when comparing different kick-off time groups (p > 0.05), however, the mean of time attributed to muscle and ankle ligament injuries suffered in games with a late kick-off time was significantly longer (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that there is no significant (p > 0.05) association between three different kick-off time groups and injury risk in the first German Bundesliga. However, significant (p < 0.05) differences in the lay-off times attributed to muscle and ankle ligament injuries differed with different kick-off times assorted into the three groups. Reasons for this observation could be found in the circadian muscle rhythms and muscle fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590477/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024031
L Follet, V Khanduja, G Thevendran, O Ayeni, S Shanmugasundaram, M Abd El-Radi, H Said, A Abdelazeem, P Slullitel, O Marin-Peña, E Audenaert
Hip arthroscopy is a rapidly evolving field in orthopedics, offering diagnostic and therapeutic benefits for a range of hip pathologies. This review outlines a comprehensive guide to initiating hip arthroscopy safely and effectively using evidence-based practices. Optimal surgical outcomes depend on correct indications for surgery, in particular in the presence of borderline dysplasia and degenerative joint diseases. Proper patient counseling and setting realistic expectations are crucial for satisfactory outcomes and recovery. Physical examination, radiographs, MRI, and CT scans are essential for accurate diagnosis. In case of diagnostic uncertainty, the use of intra-articular injections can help confirm the diagnosis before surgery. Techniques for hip arthroscopy include central compartment first, peripheral compartment first, and outside-in approaches. Each technique has advantages, and the optimal approach depends on the specific case. Finally, Proper operating room setup, meticulous patient positioning, and precise portal placement are critical for a successful procedure. A thorough understanding of the safe zone anatomy for portal placement is essential to minimize the risk of neurovascular complications. In conclusion, this manuscript provides a detailed, evidence-based framework for starting hip arthroscopy, emphasizing the importance of technical proficiency, patient selection, and a multidisciplinary approach to ensure patient safety and procedure efficacy.
{"title":"How to start with hip arthroscopy in a safe and effective manner, using an evidence-based approach.","authors":"L Follet, V Khanduja, G Thevendran, O Ayeni, S Shanmugasundaram, M Abd El-Radi, H Said, A Abdelazeem, P Slullitel, O Marin-Peña, E Audenaert","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hip arthroscopy is a rapidly evolving field in orthopedics, offering diagnostic and therapeutic benefits for a range of hip pathologies. This review outlines a comprehensive guide to initiating hip arthroscopy safely and effectively using evidence-based practices. Optimal surgical outcomes depend on correct indications for surgery, in particular in the presence of borderline dysplasia and degenerative joint diseases. Proper patient counseling and setting realistic expectations are crucial for satisfactory outcomes and recovery. Physical examination, radiographs, MRI, and CT scans are essential for accurate diagnosis. In case of diagnostic uncertainty, the use of intra-articular injections can help confirm the diagnosis before surgery. Techniques for hip arthroscopy include central compartment first, peripheral compartment first, and outside-in approaches. Each technique has advantages, and the optimal approach depends on the specific case. Finally, Proper operating room setup, meticulous patient positioning, and precise portal placement are critical for a successful procedure. A thorough understanding of the safe zone anatomy for portal placement is essential to minimize the risk of neurovascular complications. In conclusion, this manuscript provides a detailed, evidence-based framework for starting hip arthroscopy, emphasizing the importance of technical proficiency, patient selection, and a multidisciplinary approach to ensure patient safety and procedure efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415036/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-24DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024040
Valery Yu Murylev, Grigory A Kukovenko, Olga Efimenko, Aleksei V Muzychenkov, Pavel M Elizarov, Alexander I Rudnev, Semyon S Alekseev, Dmitrii O Golubkin
Introduction: There is a wide range of commercially produced revision implants for adequate reconstruction of acetabular large bone defects today, however, it is not always possible to achieve long-term survival of these implants. There is an increasing number of scientific publications concerning the use of custom-designed 3D components, which make it possible not only to achieve stable fixation and connect the pelvic bones but also to restore hip joint biomechanics.
Objectives: To evaluate the positioning of 3D acetabular implants after revision hip arthroplasty and its impact on clinical and functional outcomes.
Methods: we analyzed results in 48 patients with bone defect types IIIA and IIIB Paprosky types, after revision hip arthroplasty. A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2023. Revision arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the components was performed in 30 cases and as a second stage of periprosthetic infection treatment in 18 cases.
Results: We did not achieve a statistically significant difference when using additional flanges and clinical and functional results. In 2 cases we faced aseptic loosening in patients using flanges. In no case were we able to install an implant with 100% adherence to porous structure compared to preoperatively planned adherence. According to the WOMAC and VAS scales, increasing the contact area of the components showed a slight statistical difference in the improvement of clinical and functional results and the reduction of pain.
Conclusions: When acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by more than 68%, we did not register a single complication in the postoperative period, and acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by less than 68%, a total of 8 (16.6%) complications were registered.
{"title":"Does the interface between individual 3D acetabular implants and host bone influence the functional outcomes in patients with severe bone loss after revision surgery?","authors":"Valery Yu Murylev, Grigory A Kukovenko, Olga Efimenko, Aleksei V Muzychenkov, Pavel M Elizarov, Alexander I Rudnev, Semyon S Alekseev, Dmitrii O Golubkin","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a wide range of commercially produced revision implants for adequate reconstruction of acetabular large bone defects today, however, it is not always possible to achieve long-term survival of these implants. There is an increasing number of scientific publications concerning the use of custom-designed 3D components, which make it possible not only to achieve stable fixation and connect the pelvic bones but also to restore hip joint biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the positioning of 3D acetabular implants after revision hip arthroplasty and its impact on clinical and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we analyzed results in 48 patients with bone defect types IIIA and IIIB Paprosky types, after revision hip arthroplasty. A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2023. Revision arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the components was performed in 30 cases and as a second stage of periprosthetic infection treatment in 18 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not achieve a statistically significant difference when using additional flanges and clinical and functional results. In 2 cases we faced aseptic loosening in patients using flanges. In no case were we able to install an implant with 100% adherence to porous structure compared to preoperatively planned adherence. According to the WOMAC and VAS scales, increasing the contact area of the components showed a slight statistical difference in the improvement of clinical and functional results and the reduction of pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by more than 68%, we did not register a single complication in the postoperative period, and acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by less than 68%, a total of 8 (16.6%) complications were registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024027
David Latz, Erik Schiffner, Christos Koukos, Falk Hilsmann, Joachim Windolf, Johannes Schneppendahl
Purpose: The current study aimed to investigate the correlation between the grade of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and the fracture pattern observed in fragility fractures of the proximal femur. The information may help in cases of occult hip fractures.
Methods: In this retrospective study all 448 patients treated with fragility fractures of the proximal femur in the years 2014-2018 were included. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group I) intracapsular (femoral neck) fractures and Group II) extracapsular (pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric) femoral fractures. The radiographic grade of OA was determined according to Kellgren and Lawrence's classification. One single observer examined all radiographs.
Results: Patients' age ranged between 52 and 104 years with a mean of 80.0 years. There was a significant difference in mean age between the two groups (76.9 years intracapsular vs. 83.1 years extracapsular fractures). A total of 250 (55.8%) fractures were intracapsular (femoral neck) and 198 (44.2%) were located extracapsular (pertrochanteric, subtrochanteric). A significant correlation between the degree of OA to fracture pattern was observed: Higher degrees of OA were related to extracapsular fractures and lower degrees of OA to intracapsular fractures.
Conclusion: The results of this study support the hypothesis that hip osteoarthritis affects the fracture pattern in proximal femur fractures. More severe hip OA is associated with extracapsular fractures that can be treated surgically with lower complication rates compared to intracapsular fractures.
目的:本研究旨在探讨髋关节骨关节炎(OA)放射学分级与股骨近端脆性骨折中观察到的骨折模式之间的相关性。这些信息可能有助于处理隐匿性髋部骨折病例:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2014-2018年接受治疗的448名股骨近端脆性骨折患者。患者被分为两组:I组)囊内(股骨颈)骨折和II组)囊外(转子上和转子下)股骨骨折。根据 Kellgren 和 Lawrence 的分类法确定 OA 的影像学分级。所有X光片均由一名观察者进行检查:结果:患者的年龄在 52 至 104 岁之间,平均年龄为 80.0 岁。两组患者的平均年龄存在明显差异(囊内骨折为 76.9 岁,囊外骨折为 83.1 岁)。共有250例(55.8%)骨折位于囊内(股骨颈),198例(44.2%)位于囊外(转子前、转子下)。OA程度与骨折形态之间存在明显的相关性:OA程度越高与囊外骨折越相关,OA程度越低与囊内骨折越相关:本研究结果支持髋关节骨性关节炎影响股骨近端骨折形态的假设。更严重的髋关节OA与囊外骨折有关,与囊内骨折相比,囊外骨折可通过手术治疗,并发症发生率较低。
{"title":"Fractures of the proximal femur and hip osteoarthrosis - coincidence or coherence?","authors":"David Latz, Erik Schiffner, Christos Koukos, Falk Hilsmann, Joachim Windolf, Johannes Schneppendahl","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024027","DOIUrl":"10.1051/sicotj/2024027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current study aimed to investigate the correlation between the grade of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and the fracture pattern observed in fragility fractures of the proximal femur. The information may help in cases of occult hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study all 448 patients treated with fragility fractures of the proximal femur in the years 2014-2018 were included. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group I) intracapsular (femoral neck) fractures and Group II) extracapsular (pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric) femoral fractures. The radiographic grade of OA was determined according to Kellgren and Lawrence's classification. One single observer examined all radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' age ranged between 52 and 104 years with a mean of 80.0 years. There was a significant difference in mean age between the two groups (76.9 years intracapsular vs. 83.1 years extracapsular fractures). A total of 250 (55.8%) fractures were intracapsular (femoral neck) and 198 (44.2%) were located extracapsular (pertrochanteric, subtrochanteric). A significant correlation between the degree of OA to fracture pattern was observed: Higher degrees of OA were related to extracapsular fractures and lower degrees of OA to intracapsular fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study support the hypothesis that hip osteoarthritis affects the fracture pattern in proximal femur fractures. More severe hip OA is associated with extracapsular fractures that can be treated surgically with lower complication rates compared to intracapsular fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}