Pub Date : 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102137
Michelle O’Connor , Mairead Fagan , Marie-Louise Ryan
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mobile X-ray services offer timely diagnostics for frail or immobile patients, potentially reducing hospital admissions. However, limited research exists on implementation from the care facility perspective. This study examines the operational, organisational, and experiential use of mobile X-ray services in Irish care homes, identifying key barriers and facilitators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to all 377 healthcare facility managers nationwide who use mobile X-ray services, constituting a census of the eligible population. The anonymous survey was circulated via email by the mobile X-ray service provider in October 2024, remained open for four weeks, and included a reminder sent after two weeks. The pilot-tested 23-item instrument captured data across three domains: operational (referral pathways, usage frequency, logistical access), organisational (facility type, ownership, size, duration of service use), and experiential (perceived benefits, challenges, and satisfaction). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binomial logistic regression to examine predictors of mobile X-ray usage, with independent variables including facility type, ownership, size, and service duration. All analyses were conducted in SPSS version 29, using two-sided significance tests. Qualitative data underwent deductive thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 114 respondents (30.2 % response rate), most were from nursing homes (82.5 %, <em>n</em> = 94) and private facilities (65.8 %, <em>n</em> = 75). Multivariable regression, adjusted for facility and service characteristics, found no significant predictors of satisfaction (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Overall, the model did not significantly improve prediction of utilisation rates compared with a baseline model (Omnibus LR χ² = 3.34, df = 6, <em>p</em> = 0.77). General Practitioners (GPs) initiated 93 % of referrals, primarily for chest, pelvis/hip, and extremity imaging. The most important motivations were reducing patient discomfort and avoiding hospital transfers, with 97.2 %–99.1 % of respondents rating these factors as “important” or “extremely important” in the decision to use mobile radiography services. Reported benefits included fewer hospitalisations, improved patient comfort, and diagnostic efficiency. Barriers involved limited availability, logistical access issues and GP referral issues.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Findings indicate that mobile X-ray services are a highly valued component of community-based healthcare in Ireland, aligning with principles of patient-centred care. The high satisfaction and perceived benefits support the role of these services in improving patient outcomes and reducing hospital admissions. The study also highlights areas for operational improvement, such as streamlining referral processes.</div></div><div><h
背景:移动x射线服务为身体虚弱或行动不便的患者提供及时诊断,可能减少住院人数。然而,从护理机构的角度对实施的研究有限。本研究考察了爱尔兰护理院移动x射线服务的操作、组织和经验使用情况,确定了主要障碍和促进因素。方法:对全国377名使用移动x射线服务的医疗机构管理人员进行横断面电子调查,构成合格人口普查。这项匿名调查于2024年10月由移动x光服务提供商通过电子邮件分发,持续了四周,并在两周后发送了提醒。试点测试的23项仪器捕获了三个领域的数据:运营(推荐途径、使用频率、后勤访问)、组织(设施类型、所有权、规模、服务使用持续时间)和体验(感知的好处、挑战和满意度)。定量数据分析采用描述性统计和二项逻辑回归来检验移动x射线使用的预测因素,自变量包括设备类型、所有权、规模和服务时间。所有分析均在SPSS version 29中进行,采用双侧显著性检验。定性数据进行演绎主题分析。获得伦理批准。结果:114名受访者(30.2%)中,大多数来自养老院(82.5%,n = 94)和私立机构(65.8%,n = 75)。多变量回归,调整设施和服务特征,没有发现显著的预测满意度(p < 0.05)。总体而言,与基线模型相比,该模型没有显著改善利用率预测(Omnibus LR χ²= 3.34,df = 6, p = 0.77)。全科医生(gp)发起了93%的转诊,主要是胸部、骨盆/髋关节和四肢成像。最重要的动机是减少患者的不适和避免医院转院,97.2% - 99.1%的受访者认为这些因素在决定使用移动放射照相服务时“重要”或“极其重要”。报告的益处包括住院次数减少、患者舒适度提高和诊断效率提高。障碍包括有限的可用性、后勤访问问题和全科医生转诊问题。讨论:研究结果表明,移动x射线服务是爱尔兰社区医疗保健的一个高度重视的组成部分,符合以患者为中心的护理原则。高满意度和可感知的益处支持了这些服务在改善患者预后和减少住院率方面的作用。该研究还强调了需要改进业务的领域,例如精简转诊程序。结论:移动x线服务得到了爱尔兰医护人员的大力支持,提高了诊断的可及性和患者的舒适度。调查结果表明,这些服务与以人为本和以老龄化为重点的医疗保健战略相一致,支持它们在更广泛的国家护理模式中发挥潜在作用。
{"title":"Community and residential care providers' perspectives on the impact of mobile x-ray services in Ireland: A national study","authors":"Michelle O’Connor , Mairead Fagan , Marie-Louise Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102137","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102137","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mobile X-ray services offer timely diagnostics for frail or immobile patients, potentially reducing hospital admissions. However, limited research exists on implementation from the care facility perspective. This study examines the operational, organisational, and experiential use of mobile X-ray services in Irish care homes, identifying key barriers and facilitators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to all 377 healthcare facility managers nationwide who use mobile X-ray services, constituting a census of the eligible population. The anonymous survey was circulated via email by the mobile X-ray service provider in October 2024, remained open for four weeks, and included a reminder sent after two weeks. The pilot-tested 23-item instrument captured data across three domains: operational (referral pathways, usage frequency, logistical access), organisational (facility type, ownership, size, duration of service use), and experiential (perceived benefits, challenges, and satisfaction). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binomial logistic regression to examine predictors of mobile X-ray usage, with independent variables including facility type, ownership, size, and service duration. All analyses were conducted in SPSS version 29, using two-sided significance tests. Qualitative data underwent deductive thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 114 respondents (30.2 % response rate), most were from nursing homes (82.5 %, <em>n</em> = 94) and private facilities (65.8 %, <em>n</em> = 75). Multivariable regression, adjusted for facility and service characteristics, found no significant predictors of satisfaction (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Overall, the model did not significantly improve prediction of utilisation rates compared with a baseline model (Omnibus LR χ² = 3.34, df = 6, <em>p</em> = 0.77). General Practitioners (GPs) initiated 93 % of referrals, primarily for chest, pelvis/hip, and extremity imaging. The most important motivations were reducing patient discomfort and avoiding hospital transfers, with 97.2 %–99.1 % of respondents rating these factors as “important” or “extremely important” in the decision to use mobile radiography services. Reported benefits included fewer hospitalisations, improved patient comfort, and diagnostic efficiency. Barriers involved limited availability, logistical access issues and GP referral issues.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Findings indicate that mobile X-ray services are a highly valued component of community-based healthcare in Ireland, aligning with principles of patient-centred care. The high satisfaction and perceived benefits support the role of these services in improving patient outcomes and reducing hospital admissions. The study also highlights areas for operational improvement, such as streamlining referral processes.</div></div><div><h","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"Article 102137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145484059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Retraction notice to “Insights into enhanced learning through virtual reality” [Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 55 (2024) 101767]","authors":"Olena Petrovna Ivanova, Pavlo Shevchenko, Kateryna Ivanovna Petrenko","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102125","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102125","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"Article 102125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102138
Kitty Chan , Nicole Harnett , Yat Tsang
Background
Advanced practice radiation therapist (APRT) roles have expanded internationally to address cancer workforce shortages and improve service delivery. A Canadian consensus process previously established 20 standardized APRT clinical activities across five themes. This study evaluated the international applicability of these activities through expert consensus to establish a global framework for APRT practice.
Methods and materials
A systematic three-round international Delphi consensus study was conducted following established quality framework recommendations. Expert panel members were recruited from an international Community of Practice using objective selection criteria ensuring recognized APRT expertise and diverse geographical representation. Participant anonymity was maintained throughout all rounds. Controlled feedback provided quantitative results and anonymized qualitative comments between rounds. Consensus threshold was defined a priori at 80% agreement, and activities were evaluated for inclusion in international APRT scope of practice across five themes: patient interactions, multidisciplinary consultation, virtual consultation, resource optimization, and technical activities.
Results
Twenty-three international experts were invited to take part in the study with response rates of 81% (Round 1), 89% (Round 2), and 89% (Round 3). Twenty clinical activities were systematically evaluated. Five activities achieved immediate Round 1 consensus: Planning Consultation (83%), Multidisciplinary Pre-treatment Consultation (83%), Care Coordination (96%), Patient Navigation (87%), and Technical Consultation (87%). Following iterative three-round evaluation, 16 of 20 activities (80%) achieved final international consensus for APRT practice inclusion. Four activities failed to reach consensus: Patient Education/Informed Consent (75%), Follow-up Consultation (78%), Clinical Examination (78%), and MR Applicator Assessment (65%). The validated framework demonstrates substantial global alignment while identifying specific jurisdictional variations in advanced practice acceptance.
Conclusions
This study establishes international consensus on core APRT clinical activities, providing evidence-based foundations for standardized global APRT role development and implementation. These findings support healthcare systems in addressing workforce challenges through validated advanced practice frameworks while maintaining quality cancer care delivery.
{"title":"A step towards global understanding of advanced practice radiation therapist clinical activities: International Delphi consensus","authors":"Kitty Chan , Nicole Harnett , Yat Tsang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102138","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102138","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Advanced practice radiation therapist (APRT) roles have expanded internationally to address cancer workforce shortages and improve service delivery. A Canadian consensus process previously established 20 standardized APRT clinical activities across five themes. This study evaluated the international applicability of these activities through expert consensus to establish a global framework for APRT practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>A systematic three-round international Delphi consensus study was conducted following established quality framework recommendations. Expert panel members were recruited from an international Community of Practice using objective selection criteria ensuring recognized APRT expertise and diverse geographical representation. Participant anonymity was maintained throughout all rounds. Controlled feedback provided quantitative results and anonymized qualitative comments between rounds. Consensus threshold was defined <em>a priori</em> at 80% agreement, and activities were evaluated for inclusion in international APRT scope of practice across five themes: patient interactions, multidisciplinary consultation, virtual consultation, resource optimization, and technical activities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-three international experts were invited to take part in the study with response rates of 81% (Round 1), 89% (Round 2), and 89% (Round 3). Twenty clinical activities were systematically evaluated. Five activities achieved immediate Round 1 consensus: Planning Consultation (83%), Multidisciplinary Pre-treatment Consultation (83%), Care Coordination (96%), Patient Navigation (87%), and Technical Consultation (87%). Following iterative three-round evaluation, 16 of 20 activities (80%) achieved final international consensus for APRT practice inclusion. Four activities failed to reach consensus: Patient Education/Informed Consent (75%), Follow-up Consultation (78%), Clinical Examination (78%), and MR Applicator Assessment (65%). The validated framework demonstrates substantial global alignment while identifying specific jurisdictional variations in advanced practice acceptance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study establishes international consensus on core APRT clinical activities, providing evidence-based foundations for standardized global APRT role development and implementation. These findings support healthcare systems in addressing workforce challenges through validated advanced practice frameworks while maintaining quality cancer care delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"Article 102138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145461063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102133
Marco Caballo , Laura McLennan , Matthew Benbow , Mark Condron , Andrea Foden , Sue Thomas , Russell Bull
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) may help reduce the examination time and simplify the scanning process during CT image acquisition. This cross-sectional study aims to quantitatively and objectively assess the potential benefits of an AI-assisted CT acquisition platform in streamlining CT acquisition workflow, by reducing time and user interactions, compared to a non-AI-assisted platform.
Methods
Twelve certified diagnostic radiographers scanned an anthropomorphic body phantom for four different protocols on two similar CT systems, one equipped with an AI-assisted scanning platform and one without. Scanning sessions were video-recorded, and two primary variables (total examination time and number of user interactions with the platforms) were extracted. Differences in variable outcomes between the two platforms were analyzed statistically with the Mann-Whitney U test (with Bonferroni correction). The influence of radiographers’ experience on each variable outcome was quantified with Spearman correlation, and inter-reader agreement among the radiographers with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
Acquisition time and number of interactions were both significantly lower on the AI-assisted platform (P < 0.001). The average (±standard deviation) reduction in acquisition time was between 40.2 % (±9.8 %) and 52.8 % (±10.9 %), depending on the protocol. The average (±standard deviation) reduction in interactions was between 35.6 % (±9.7 %) and 45.1 % (±14.0 %), depending on the protocol. No significant correlation was found between radiographer experience and acquisition time or number of interactions for either platform (P ≥ 0.3). Inter-reader agreement was substantial on both platforms (acquisition time: ICC = 0.82 and ICC = 0.85 respectively for the AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted platform; interactions: ICC = 0.76 and ICC = 0.81 respectively for the AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted platform).
Discussion
AI-assisted CT acquisition platforms may improve CT acquisition workflow, pending further confirmation in future multicenter studies and with large datasets of patient data.
Conclusion
A reduction in time and interactions required to perform CT image acquisition may have real-world pragmatic implications in reducing radiographer workload and improving departmental throughput.
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of an artificial intelligence-assisted platform in CT acquisition workflow","authors":"Marco Caballo , Laura McLennan , Matthew Benbow , Mark Condron , Andrea Foden , Sue Thomas , Russell Bull","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102133","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102133","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) may help reduce the examination time and simplify the scanning process during CT image acquisition. This cross-sectional study aims to quantitatively and objectively assess the potential benefits of an AI-assisted CT acquisition platform in streamlining CT acquisition workflow, by reducing time and user interactions, compared to a non-AI-assisted platform.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twelve certified diagnostic radiographers scanned an anthropomorphic body phantom for four different protocols on two similar CT systems, one equipped with an AI-assisted scanning platform and one without. Scanning sessions were video-recorded, and two primary variables (total examination time and number of user interactions with the platforms) were extracted. Differences in variable outcomes between the two platforms were analyzed statistically with the Mann-Whitney <em>U test</em> (with Bonferroni correction). The influence of radiographers’ experience on each variable outcome was quantified with Spearman correlation, and inter-reader agreement among the radiographers with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Acquisition time and number of interactions were both significantly lower on the AI-assisted platform (<em>P</em> < 0.001). The average (±standard deviation) reduction in acquisition time was between 40.2 % (±9.8 %) and 52.8 % (±10.9 %), depending on the protocol. The average (±standard deviation) reduction in interactions was between 35.6 % (±9.7 %) and 45.1 % (±14.0 %), depending on the protocol. No significant correlation was found between radiographer experience and acquisition time or number of interactions for either platform (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.3). Inter-reader agreement was substantial on both platforms (acquisition time: ICC = 0.82 and ICC = 0.85 respectively for the AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted platform; interactions: ICC = 0.76 and ICC = 0.81 respectively for the AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted platform).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>AI-assisted CT acquisition platforms may improve CT acquisition workflow, pending further confirmation in future multicenter studies and with large datasets of patient data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A reduction in time and interactions required to perform CT image acquisition may have real-world pragmatic implications in reducing radiographer workload and improving departmental throughput.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"Article 102133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145428679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102132
Mohamed Zakaria El-Sayed , Mohammad Rawashdeh , Husna. N , Nasiha. N , Nidha. S , Shima Ibrahim Ali , Magdi. A Ali
Introduction
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a valuable diagnostic tool, but its enclosed environment can provoke claustrophobia in patients, often leading to incomplete scans and delayed diagnoses. Radiographers play a pivotal role in managing these cases, yet limited research has explored how their experience and the support they receive influence management strategies. This study aimed to assess radiographers' practices, perceived barriers, and the impact of professional experience and support structures in managing claustrophobic patients during MRI procedures in the UAE.
Methods
A cross-sectional, internet-based survey was conducted among licensed radiographers across the UAE using a validated, pre-tested 23-item questionnaire. Convenience and snowball sampling were applied, with data collected via Google Forms and analyzed using SPSS v20. Chi-square and Monte Carlo tests assessed associations between years of experience and reported practices or barriers and access to professional or institutional support.
Results
Out of 106 respondents, 53.8 % frequently encountered claustrophobic patients, and 39.6 % reported rescheduling scans. Experienced radiographers more often used techniques like scanner previews (X2 = 18.929*, p = 0.015), comfort measures (X2 = 22.265*, p = 0.012), and relaxation techniques (X2 = 23.719*, p = 0.007). Significant barriers included lack of training (X2 = 25.370*, p = 0.002), time constraints (X2 = 16.508*, p = 0.030), and inadequate equipment (X2 = 21.496*, p = 0.003). While newer radiographers highlighted training needs, experienced staff emphasized institutional limitations, reinforcing that both expertise and structured support are critical for effective patient management.
Conclusion
Radiographers' experience significantly influences how claustrophobic patients are managed. However, experience alone is insufficient without appropriate support systems that enable radiographers to apply their skills effectively and consistently. Despite individual efforts, systemic barriers persist.
磁共振成像(MRI)是一种有价值的诊断工具,但其封闭的环境会引起患者的幽闭恐惧症,经常导致扫描不完整和诊断延迟。放射技师在管理这些病例中发挥着关键作用,然而,关于他们的经验和他们得到的支持如何影响管理策略的研究有限。本研究旨在评估阿联酋MRI过程中放射技师的实践、感知障碍以及专业经验和支持结构对幽闭恐惧症患者管理的影响。方法采用一份经过验证的、预先测试的23项问卷,对阿联酋的执业放射技师进行了一项基于互联网的横断面调查。采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样,通过谷歌Forms收集数据,使用SPSS v20进行分析。卡方检验和蒙特卡罗检验评估了经验年数与报告的做法或障碍与获得专业或机构支持之间的关联。结果在106名受访者中,53.8%的人经常遇到幽闭恐惧症患者,39.6%的人报告重新安排扫描时间。经验丰富的放射技师更多地使用扫描仪预览(X2 = 18.929*, p = 0.015)、舒适措施(X2 = 22.265*, p = 0.012)和放松技术(X2 = 23.719*, p = 0.007)。主要障碍包括缺乏培训(X2 = 25.370*, p = 0.002)、时间限制(X2 = 16.508*, p = 0.030)和设备不足(X2 = 21.496*, p = 0.003)。虽然新放射技师强调培训需求,但经验丰富的工作人员强调制度限制,强调专业知识和结构化支持对有效的患者管理至关重要。结论放射技师的经验对幽闭恐惧症患者的治疗有显著影响。然而,如果没有适当的支持系统使放射技师能够有效和持续地应用他们的技能,仅凭经验是不够的。尽管个人做出了努力,但体制障碍依然存在。
{"title":"Experience matters, but support is essential: Managing claustrophobic patients in MRI practice","authors":"Mohamed Zakaria El-Sayed , Mohammad Rawashdeh , Husna. N , Nasiha. N , Nidha. S , Shima Ibrahim Ali , Magdi. A Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102132","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102132","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a valuable diagnostic tool, but its enclosed environment can provoke claustrophobia in patients, often leading to incomplete scans and delayed diagnoses. Radiographers play a pivotal role in managing these cases, yet limited research has explored how their experience and the support they receive influence management strategies. This study aimed to assess radiographers' practices, perceived barriers, and the impact of professional experience and support structures in managing claustrophobic patients during MRI procedures in the UAE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional, internet-based survey was conducted among licensed radiographers across the UAE using a validated, pre-tested 23-item questionnaire. Convenience and snowball sampling were applied, with data collected via Google Forms and analyzed using SPSS v20. Chi-square and Monte Carlo tests assessed associations between years of experience and reported practices or barriers and access to professional or institutional support.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 106 respondents, 53.8 % frequently encountered claustrophobic patients, and 39.6 % reported rescheduling scans. Experienced radiographers more often used techniques like scanner previews (X<sup>2</sup> = 18.929*, <em>p</em> = 0.015), comfort measures (X<sup>2</sup> = 22.265*, <em>p</em> = 0.012), and relaxation techniques (X<sup>2</sup> = 23.719*, <em>p</em> = 0.007). Significant barriers included lack of training (X<sup>2</sup> = 25.370*, <em>p</em> = 0.002), time constraints (X<sup>2</sup> = 16.508*, <em>p</em> = 0.030), and inadequate equipment (X<sup>2</sup> = 21.496*, <em>p</em> = 0.003). While newer radiographers highlighted training needs, experienced staff emphasized institutional limitations, reinforcing that both expertise and structured support are critical for effective patient management.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiographers' experience significantly influences how claustrophobic patients are managed. However, experience alone is insufficient without appropriate support systems that enable radiographers to apply their skills effectively and consistently. Despite individual efforts, systemic barriers persist.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"Article 102132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145428680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102127
Marie Mukandayisenga, Joseph Tabaro, Bornface Chinene, Afodun Adam, Mukangendo Mecthilde, Fils Turatsinze, Emmanuel A. Odumeru
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for medical imaging in low-resource settings like Rwanda, where shortages of imaging professionals contribute to diagnostic delays. While global research has examined AI adoption in high-income countries, limited evidence exists for sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to assess AI utilization patterns, implementation challenges, and practitioner perceptions across Rwanda's healthcare system, providing critical insights for optimizing AI integration in resource-constrained environments.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025, surveying 107 medical imaging practitioners (74 % response rate) across teaching, provincial, and district hospitals. Using a validated questionnaire, data were collected on AI utilization, implementation barriers, and practitioner attitudes. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests analyzed patterns and associations.
Results
Automated measurements were the most widely used AI application (69.2 % of practitioners), while segmentation AI was the least adopted (7.7 %). Utilization disparities were stark: 71.0 % of teaching hospitals used AI versus 13.1 % of district hospitals. Key barriers included high costs (27.1 % of respondents), system integration challenges (26.2 %), and training deficiencies (44.2 % across all professional ranks, p > 0.05). Despite these challenges, 86 % of practitioners viewed AI positively, with 37.4 % strongly agreeing it improves diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion
Rwanda's AI adoption in medical imaging shows promise but remains uneven, with teaching hospitals leading implementation. Systemic barriers, particularly costs, infrastructure limitations, and training gaps, must be addressed to ensure equitable expansion. The overwhelmingly positive practitioner attitudes indicate readiness for AI integration, suggesting Rwanda is poised for growth with targeted policy interventions. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing AI implementation in low-resource settings across sub-Saharan Africa. Future research should explore cost-effective scaling strategies and long-term impacts on diagnostic outcomes.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: Utilization, challenges, and practitioner perceptions in Rwanda","authors":"Marie Mukandayisenga, Joseph Tabaro, Bornface Chinene, Afodun Adam, Mukangendo Mecthilde, Fils Turatsinze, Emmanuel A. Odumeru","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102127","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102127","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for medical imaging in low-resource settings like Rwanda, where shortages of imaging professionals contribute to diagnostic delays. While global research has examined AI adoption in high-income countries, limited evidence exists for sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to assess AI utilization patterns, implementation challenges, and practitioner perceptions across Rwanda's healthcare system, providing critical insights for optimizing AI integration in resource-constrained environments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025, surveying 107 medical imaging practitioners (74 % response rate) across teaching, provincial, and district hospitals. Using a validated questionnaire, data were collected on AI utilization, implementation barriers, and practitioner attitudes. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests analyzed patterns and associations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Automated measurements were the most widely used AI application (69.2 % of practitioners), while segmentation AI was the least adopted (7.7 %). Utilization disparities were stark: 71.0 % of teaching hospitals used AI versus 13.1 % of district hospitals. Key barriers included high costs (27.1 % of respondents), system integration challenges (26.2 %), and training deficiencies (44.2 % across all professional ranks, <em>p</em> > 0.05). Despite these challenges, 86 % of practitioners viewed AI positively, with 37.4 % strongly agreeing it improves diagnostic accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Rwanda's AI adoption in medical imaging shows promise but remains uneven, with teaching hospitals leading implementation. Systemic barriers, particularly costs, infrastructure limitations, and training gaps, must be addressed to ensure equitable expansion. The overwhelmingly positive practitioner attitudes indicate readiness for AI integration, suggesting Rwanda is poised for growth with targeted policy interventions. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing AI implementation in low-resource settings across sub-Saharan Africa. Future research should explore cost-effective scaling strategies and long-term impacts on diagnostic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"Article 102127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145428678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102126
Caitlin Cassimatis, Peter O'Reilly, Amir Tavakoli Taba
Introduction
Radiography is a crucial alternative in diagnosing small bowel pathologies due to the challenges of endoscopy. This review evaluates intussusception, Crohn’s Disease, and small bowel adenocarcinoma to compare modalities across age groups and provide optimal imaging recommendations.
Methods
A systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The review included studies from the past five years comparing modalities for the diagnosis of intussusception, Crohn’s Disease, or small bowel adenocarcinoma. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used for quality assessment. Data extraction was completed using a standardised template, and a thematic approach for narrative synthesis was performed.
Results
Thirty-five studies were included, highlighting a higher diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound over radiography in pediatric intussusception. In adults, computed tomography (CT) was the only viable imaging modality, and adenocarcinoma was the most common malignant underlying cause of obstruction. Literature on adenocarcinoma was limited, with no analysis beyond standard cross-sectional modalities. In Crohn’s Disease, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was considered advantageous for young people. CT techniques were emerging in terms of prominence for the monitoring of Crohn’s Disease activity.
Conclusion
Ultrasound is recommended for pediatric intussusception diagnosis, with radiographs favoured for predicting surgical outcomes. For Crohn’s Disease, the optimal use of CT and MRI depends upon the phase of disease at the time of imaging. Given the late diagnosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma, further research into an optimised diagnostic pathway is necessary. Novel small bowel imaging techniques emerging in ultrasound, CT and MRI demonstrate potential diagnostic benefits for clinical use due to increased ability to differentiate between pathologies and reduced radiation doses.
简介:由于内窥镜检查的挑战,x线摄影是诊断小肠病变的重要替代方法。本综述评估了肠套叠、克罗恩病和小肠腺癌,以比较不同年龄组的诊断方式,并提供最佳的影像学建议。方法:在Embase、Medline、Scopus和Web of Science中按照系统评价和meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行系统检索。该综述包括过去5年的研究,比较了肠套叠、克罗恩病或小肠腺癌的诊断方式。关键评估技能方案工具用于质量评估。使用标准化模板完成数据提取,并采用主题方法进行叙事综合。结果:纳入了35项研究,强调了超声对儿童肠套叠的诊断准确性高于x线摄影。在成人中,计算机断层扫描(CT)是唯一可行的成像方式,腺癌是最常见的恶性阻塞的潜在原因。关于腺癌的文献有限,没有超出标准横断面模式的分析。在克罗恩病中,磁共振成像(MRI)被认为对年轻人有利。CT技术在克罗恩病活动监测方面的突出表现。结论:超声推荐用于小儿肠套叠的诊断,而x线片更有利于预测手术结果。对于克罗恩病,CT和MRI的最佳使用取决于成像时疾病的阶段。鉴于小肠腺癌的晚期诊断,进一步研究优化的诊断途径是必要的。在超声、CT和MRI中出现的新型小肠成像技术,由于增强了区分病理的能力和降低了辐射剂量,在临床应用中显示出潜在的诊断益处。
{"title":"Evaluating the utility of different radiographic imaging modalities for assessing intussusception, Crohn's Disease and adenocarcinoma to the small bowel: A systematic review","authors":"Caitlin Cassimatis, Peter O'Reilly, Amir Tavakoli Taba","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102126","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102126","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiography is a crucial alternative in diagnosing small bowel pathologies due to the challenges of endoscopy. This review evaluates intussusception, Crohn’s Disease, and small bowel adenocarcinoma to compare modalities across age groups and provide optimal imaging recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The review included studies from the past five years comparing modalities for the diagnosis of intussusception, Crohn’s Disease, or small bowel adenocarcinoma. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used for quality assessment. Data extraction was completed using a standardised template, and a thematic approach for narrative synthesis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-five studies were included, highlighting a higher diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound over radiography in pediatric intussusception. In adults, computed tomography (CT) was the only viable imaging modality, and adenocarcinoma was the most common malignant underlying cause of obstruction. Literature on adenocarcinoma was limited, with no analysis beyond standard cross-sectional modalities. In Crohn’s Disease, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was considered advantageous for young people. CT techniques were emerging in terms of prominence for the monitoring of Crohn’s Disease activity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ultrasound is recommended for pediatric intussusception diagnosis, with radiographs favoured for predicting surgical outcomes. For Crohn’s Disease, the optimal use of CT and MRI depends upon the phase of disease at the time of imaging. Given the late diagnosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma, further research into an optimised diagnostic pathway is necessary. Novel small bowel imaging techniques emerging in ultrasound, CT and MRI demonstrate potential diagnostic benefits for clinical use due to increased ability to differentiate between pathologies and reduced radiation doses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 102126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145403435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102123
Alyssa Payne , Christopher Skilton , Daphne James
Introduction/Background
The ionising radiation exposure received by Nuclear Medicine Technologists (NMTs) is estimated to be greater than that of most other medical imaging professions. Despite the relatively low exposures considered to be received by medical imaging professionals as a whole, delayed health issues associated with potential stochastic effects from ionising radiation raise concerns. Aspects such as evolving theranostic practices, increased Positron Emission Tomography (PET) procedures, and workforce shortages contribute to heightened workloads of NMTs, thus exacerbating potential exposure risks. This scoping review intends to explore the occupational radiation exposure of NMTs, since the year 2000.
Methods
A scoping review of the relevant literature was conducted. Four databases were searched, consisting of Medline, Embase CINAHL, and Scopus. The retrieved relevant articles were screened for inclusion in Covidence. Study selection, data charting and the data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Ethics approval was not required for this study.
Results
Dose report data from 21 studies worldwide were analysed. Reported annual effective doses ranged from 0.06 mSv to 13.9 mSv. Procedures performed between sites consisted of general nuclear medicine, radionuclide therapy, and PET. Types of dosimeters used included Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs), Film Badges, Electronic Dosimeters (EDs), Radio-photoluminescence Dosimeters, and Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLs). Potential correlations have emerged between procedure types, dosimeters used, and the occupational radiation exposures reported.
Discussion
A potential link between a broader variety of procedures performed and increased dose was found, particularly implicating PET procedures. Certain dosimeters show more promise than others for enhanced sensitivity, especially in environments conducting high-energy procedures.
Conclusion
Despite heterogeneity between studies in dose reporting methods, all reported doses were within annual recommended limits. This scoping review provides a foundation for future research, aiming to refine methodologies and address challenges in the understanding of occupational radiation exposure in NMTs.
{"title":"Occupational radiation exposure in nuclear medicine technologists: A scoping review","authors":"Alyssa Payne , Christopher Skilton , Daphne James","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102123","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102123","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><div>The ionising radiation exposure received by Nuclear Medicine Technologists (NMTs) is estimated to be greater than that of most other medical imaging professions. Despite the relatively low exposures considered to be received by medical imaging professionals as a whole, delayed health issues associated with potential stochastic effects from ionising radiation raise concerns. Aspects such as evolving theranostic practices, increased Positron Emission Tomography (PET) procedures, and workforce shortages contribute to heightened workloads of NMTs, thus exacerbating potential exposure risks. This scoping review intends to explore the occupational radiation exposure of NMTs, since the year 2000.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review of the relevant literature was conducted. Four databases were searched, consisting of Medline, Embase CINAHL, and Scopus. The retrieved relevant articles were screened for inclusion in Covidence. Study selection, data charting and the data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Ethics approval was not required for this study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dose report data from 21 studies worldwide were analysed. Reported annual effective doses ranged from 0.06 mSv to 13.9 mSv. Procedures performed between sites consisted of general nuclear medicine, radionuclide therapy, and PET. Types of dosimeters used included Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs), Film Badges, Electronic Dosimeters (EDs), Radio-photoluminescence Dosimeters, and Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLs). Potential correlations have emerged between procedure types, dosimeters used, and the occupational radiation exposures reported.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>A potential link between a broader variety of procedures performed and increased dose was found, particularly implicating PET procedures. Certain dosimeters show more promise than others for enhanced sensitivity, especially in environments conducting high-energy procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite heterogeneity between studies in dose reporting methods, all reported doses were within annual recommended limits. This scoping review provides a foundation for future research, aiming to refine methodologies and address challenges in the understanding of occupational radiation exposure in NMTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 102123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145395866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102121
Gerry Ash
{"title":"Painting courage: The art of mask making","authors":"Gerry Ash","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102121","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102121","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 102121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145395991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-18DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102122
Yousif Al-Naser , Sonali Sharma , Ken Niure , Kevin Ibach , Faisal Khosa , Charlotte J. Yong-Hing
Background
As generative AI tools increasingly produce medical imagery and videos for education, marketing, and communication, concerns have arisen about the accuracy and equity of these representations. Existing research has identified demographic biases in AI-generated depictions of healthcare professionals, but little is known about their portrayal of Medical Radiation Technologists (MRTs), particularly in the Canadian context.
Methods
This study evaluated 690 AI-generated outputs (600 images and 90 videos) created by eight leading text-to-image and text-to-video models using the prompt ``Image [or video] of a Canadian Medical Radiation Technologist.'' Each image and video was assessed for demographic characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, age, religious representation, visible disabilities), and the presence and accuracy of imaging equipment. These were compared to real-world demographic data on Canadian MRTs (n = 20,755).
Results
Significant demographic discrepancies were observed between AI-generated content and real-world data. AI depictions included a higher proportion of visible minorities (as defined by Statistics Canada) (39% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001) and males (41.4% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001), while underrepresenting women (58.5% vs. 78.8%, p < 0.001). Age representation skewed younger than actual workforce demographics (p < 0.001). Equipment representation was inconsistent, with 66% of outputs showing CT/MRI and only 4.3% showing X-rays; 26% included inaccurate or fictional equipment.
Conclusion
Generative AI models frequently produce demographically and contextually inaccurate depictions of MRTs, misrepresenting workforce diversity and clinical tools. These inconsistencies pose risks for educational accuracy, public perception, and equity in professional representation. Improved model training and prompt sensitivity are needed to ensure reliable and inclusive AI-generated medical content.
{"title":"Geographic prompting and content fidelity in generative Artificial Intelligence: A multi-model study of demographics and imaging equipment in AI-generated videos and images of Canadian medical radiation technologists","authors":"Yousif Al-Naser , Sonali Sharma , Ken Niure , Kevin Ibach , Faisal Khosa , Charlotte J. Yong-Hing","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102122","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.102122","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>As generative AI tools increasingly produce medical imagery and videos for education, marketing, and communication, concerns have arisen about the accuracy and equity of these representations. Existing research has identified demographic biases in AI-generated depictions of healthcare professionals, but little is known about their portrayal of Medical Radiation Technologists (MRTs), particularly in the Canadian context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study evaluated 690 AI-generated outputs (600 images and 90 videos) created by eight leading text-to-image and text-to-video models using the prompt ``Image [or video] of a Canadian Medical Radiation Technologist.'' Each image and video was assessed for demographic characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, age, religious representation, visible disabilities), and the presence and accuracy of imaging equipment. These were compared to real-world demographic data on Canadian MRTs (n = 20,755).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant demographic discrepancies were observed between AI-generated content and real-world data. AI depictions included a higher proportion of visible minorities (as defined by Statistics Canada) (39% vs. 20.8%, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and males (41.4% vs. 21.2%, <em>p</em> < 0.001), while underrepresenting women (58.5% vs. 78.8%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Age representation skewed younger than actual workforce demographics (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Equipment representation was inconsistent, with 66% of outputs showing CT/MRI and only 4.3% showing X-rays; 26% included inaccurate or fictional equipment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Generative AI models frequently produce demographically and contextually inaccurate depictions of MRTs, misrepresenting workforce diversity and clinical tools. These inconsistencies pose risks for educational accuracy, public perception, and equity in professional representation. Improved model training and prompt sensitivity are needed to ensure reliable and inclusive AI-generated medical content.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 102122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145331473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}