Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology最新文献

Quantifying the impact of lockdowns on COVID-19 mortality risks is an important priority in the public health fight against the virus, but almost all of the existing research has only conducted macro country-wide assessments or limited multi-country comparisons. In contrast, the extent of within-country variation in the impacts of a nation-wide lockdown is yet to be thoroughly investigated, which is the gap in the knowledge base that this paper fills. Our study focuses on England, which was subject to 3 national lockdowns between March 2020 and March 2021. We model weekly COVID-19 mortality counts for the 312 Local Authority Districts in mainland England, and our aim is to understand the impact that lockdowns had at both a national and a regional level. Specifically, we aim to quantify how long after the implementation of a lockdown do mortality risks reduce at a national level, the extent to which these impacts vary regionally within a country, and which parts of England exhibit similar impacts. As the spatially aggregated weekly COVID-19 mortality counts are small in size we estimate the spatio-temporal trends in mortality risks with a Poisson log-linear smoothing model that borrows strength in the estimation between neighbouring data points. Inference is based in a Bayesian paradigm, using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Our main findings are that mortality risks typically begin to reduce between 3 and 4 weeks after lockdown, and that there appears to be an urban–rural divide in lockdown impacts.

The global extent and temporally asynchronous pattern of COVID-19 spread have repeatedly highlighted the role of international borders in the fight against the pandemic. Additionally, the deluge of high resolution, spatially referenced epidemiological data generated by the pandemic provides new opportunities to study disease transmission at heretofore inaccessible scales. Existing studies of cross-border infection fluxes, for both COVID-19 and other diseases, have largely focused on characterizing overall border effects. Here, we couple fine-scale incidence data with localized regression models to quantify spatial variation in the inhibitory effect of an international border. We take as a case study the border region between the German state of Saxony and the neighboring regions in northwestern Czechia, where municipality-level COVID-19 incidence data are available on both sides of the border. Consistent with past studies, we find an overall inhibitory effect of the border, but with a clear asymmetry, where the inhibitory effect is stronger from Saxony to Czechia than vice versa. Furthermore, we identify marked spatial variation along the border in the degree to which disease spread was inhibited. In particular, the area around Löbau in Saxony appears to have been a hotspot for cross-border disease transmission. The ability to identify infection flux hotspots along international borders may help to tailor monitoring programs and response measures to more effectively limit disease spread.

Background

Public health organizations have increasingly harnessed geospatial technologies for disease surveillance, health services allocation, and targeting place-based health promotion initiatives.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review around the theme of space-time clustering detection techniques for infectious diseases using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Two reviewers independently determined inclusion and exclusion.

Results

Of 2,887 articles identified, 354 studies met inclusion criteria, the majority of which were application papers. Studies of airborne diseases were dominant, followed by vector-borne diseases. Most research used aggregated data instead of point data, and a significant proportion of articles used a repetition of a spatial clustering method, instead of using a “true” space-time detection approach, potentially leading to the detection of false positives. Noticeably, most articles did not make their data available, limiting replicability.

Conclusion

This review underlines recent trends in the application of space-time clustering methods to the field of infectious disease, with a rapid increase during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo's (DRC) 10^th known Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak occurred between August 1, 2018 and June 25, 2020, and was the largest EVD outbreak in the country's history. During this outbreak, the DRC Ministry of Health initiated traveller health screening at points of control (POC, locations not on the border) and points of entry (POE) to minimize disease translocation via ground and air travel. We sought to develop a model-based approach that could be applied in future outbreaks to inform decisions for optimizing POC and POE placement, and allocation of resources more broadly, to mitigate the risk of disease translocation associated with ground-level population mobility. We applied a parameter-free mobility model, the radiation model, to estimate likelihood of ground travel between selected origin locations (including Beni, DRC) and surrounding population centres, based on population size and drive-time. We then performed a road network route analysis and included estimated population movement results to calculate the proportionate volume of travellers who would move along each road segment; this reflects the proportion of travellers that could be screened at a POC or POE. For Beni, the road segments estimated to have the highest proportion of travellers that could be screened were part of routes into Uganda and Rwanda. Conversely, road segments that were part of routes to other population centres within the DRC were estimated to have relatively lower proportions. We observed a posteriori that, in many instances, our results aligned with locations that were selected for actual POC or POE placement through more time-consuming methods. This study has demonstrated that mobility models and simple spatial techniques can help identify potential locations for health screening at newly placed POC or existing POE during public health emergencies based on expected movement patterns. Importantly, we have provided methods to estimate the proportionate volume of travellers that POC or POE screening measures would assess based on their location. This is critical information in outbreak situations when timely decisions must be made to implement public health interventions that reach the most individuals across a network.

Background:

Many questions remain unanswered about how SARS-CoV-2 transmission is influenced by aspects of the economy, environment, and health. A better understanding of how these factors interact can help us to design early health prevention and control strategies, and develop better predictive models for public health risk management of SARS-CoV-2. This study examines the associations between COVID-19 epidemic growth and macro-level determinants of transmission such as demographic, socio-economic, climate and health factors, during the first wave of outbreaks in the United States.

Methods:

A spatial–temporal data-set was created from a variety of relevant data sources. A unique data-driven study design was implemented to assess the relationship between COVID-19 infection and death epidemic doubling times and explanatory variables using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM).

Results:

The main factors associated with infection doubling times are higher population density, home overcrowding, manufacturing, and recreation industries. Poverty was also an important predictor of faster epidemic growth perhaps because of factors associated with in-work poverty-related conditions, although poverty is also a predictor of poor population health which is likely driving infection and death reporting. Air pollution and diabetes were other important drivers of infection reporting. Warmer temperatures are associated with slower epidemic growth, which is most likely explained by human behaviors associated with warmer locations i.e. ventilating homes and workplaces, and socializing outdoors. The main factors associated with death doubling times were population density, poverty, older age, diabetes, and air pollution. Temperature was also slightly significant slowing death doubling times.

Conclusions:

Such findings help underpin current understanding of the disease epidemiology and also supports current policy and advice recommending ventilation of homes, work-spaces, and schools, along with social distancing and mask-wearing. Given the strong associations between doubling times and the stringency index, it is likely that those states that responded to the virus more quickly by implementing a range of measures such as school closing, workplace closing, restrictions on gatherings, close public transport, restrictions on internal movement, international travel controls, and public information campaigns, did have some success slowing the spread of the virus.

Malaria is a major public health problem especially in Africa where 94% of global malaria cases occur. Malaria prevalence and mortalities are disproportionately higher among children. In 2019, children accounted for 67% of malaria deaths globally. Recently, climatic factors have been acknowledged to influence the number and severity of malaria cases. Plasmodium falciparum—the most deadly malaria parasite, accounts for more than 95% of malaria infections among children in Ghana. Using the 2017 Ghana Demographic Health Survey data, we examined the local variation in the prevalence and climatic determinants of child malaria. The findings showed that climatic factors such as temperature, rainfall aridity and Enhanced Vegetation Index are significantly and positively associated with Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence among children in Ghana. However, there are local variations in how these climatic factors affect child malaria prevalence. Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence was highest among children in the south western, north western and northern Ghana.

Global increases in thyroid cancer incidence (≥90% differentiated thyroid cancers; DTC) are hypothesized to be related to increased use of pre-diagnostic imaging. These procedures can detect DTC during imaging for conditions unrelated to the thyroid (incidental detection). The objectives were to evaluate incidental detection of DTC associated with standardized, regional imaging capacity and drivetime from patient residence to imaging facility (the exposures). We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 32,097 DTC patients in Ontario, 2003–2017. We employed sex-specific spatial Bayesian hierarchical models to evaluate the exposures and examine the adjusted odds of incidental detection by administrative regions. Regional capacities of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scanners are positively associated with incidental detection, but vary by sex. Contrary to hypothesis, drivetimes in urban areas are positively associated with incidental detection. Access to primary care may play a role in several administrative regions with higher adjusted odds of incidental detection.

The purpose of delineating Cancer Service Areas (CSAs) is to define a reliable unit of analysis, more meaningful than geopolitical units such as states and counties, for examining geographic variations of the cancer care markets using geographic information systems (GIS). This study aims to provide a multiscale analysis of the U.S. cancer care markets based on the 2014–2015 Medicare claims of cancer-directed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The CSAs are delineated by a scale-flexible network community detection algorithm automated in GIS so that the patient flows are maximized within CSAs and minimized between them. The multiscale CSAs include those comparable in size to those 4 census regions, 9 divisions, 50 states, and also 39 global optimal CSAs that generates the highest modularity value. The CSAs are more effective in capturing the U.S. cancer care markets because of its higher localization index, lower cross-border utilizations, and shorter travel time. The first two comparisons reveal that only a few regions or divisions are representative of the underlying cancer care markets. The last two comparisons find that among the 39 CSAs, 54% CSAs comprise multiple states anchored by cities near inner state borders, 28% are single-state CSAs, and 18% are sub-state CSAs. Their (in)consistencies across state borders or within each state shed new light on where the intervention of cancer care delivery or the adjustment of cancer care costs are needed to meet the challenges in the U.S. cancer care system. The findings could guide stakeholders to target public health policies for more effective coordination of cancer care in improving outcomes and reducing unnecessary costs.