首页 > 最新文献

Australian Journal of Social Issues最新文献

英文 中文
Addressing employment barriers for humanitarian migrants: Perspectives from settlement services 解决人道主义移民的就业障碍:安置服务机构的观点
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.353
Andre M. N. Renzaho, Kerry Woodward, Michael Polonsky, Julianne Abood, Julie Green

This research seeks to understand the challenges faced by settlement service providers (SSPs) in assisting humanitarian migrants to secure appropriate employment. In-depth interviews with 26 SSPs identified that current impediments to facilitating humanitarian migrants' employment related to employment support programmes; settlement service partnerships; cultural appropriateness of services; employment readiness, experience, skills and knowledge; social support and networks; and limitations of funding and service agreements. While employment is recognised as key to effective settlement, the findings of this study show that employment services are not currently a focus of settlement services, that is, most employment services delivered by settlement services were coordinated as part of job preparedness or readiness programmes. The paper argues for government to ensure financial and human resources to enable SSPs to deliver services that can formally recognise and overcome barriers to humanitarian migrants' employment.

本研究旨在了解安置服务提供者(SSPs)在协助人道主义移民获得适当就业方面所面临的挑战。通过对 26 家 SSP 的深入访谈发现,目前促进人道主义移民就业的障碍涉及就业支持计划;安置服务合作伙伴关系;服务的文化适宜性;就业准备、经验、技能和知识;社会支持和网络;以及资金和服务协议的限制。虽然就业被认为是有效定居的关键,但本研究的结果表明,就业服务目前并不是定居服务的重点,也就是说,定居服务机构提供的大多数就业服务都是作为就业准备或就绪计划的一部分进行协调的。本文认为政府应确保财政和人力资源,使 SSP 能够提供服务,正式确认并克服人道主义移民的就业障碍。
{"title":"Addressing employment barriers for humanitarian migrants: Perspectives from settlement services","authors":"Andre M. N. Renzaho,&nbsp;Kerry Woodward,&nbsp;Michael Polonsky,&nbsp;Julianne Abood,&nbsp;Julie Green","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.353","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.353","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research seeks to understand the challenges faced by settlement service providers (SSPs) in assisting humanitarian migrants to secure appropriate employment. In-depth interviews with 26 SSPs identified that current impediments to facilitating humanitarian migrants' employment related to employment support programmes; settlement service partnerships; cultural appropriateness of services; employment readiness, experience, skills and knowledge; social support and networks; and limitations of funding and service agreements. While employment is recognised as key to effective settlement, the findings of this study show that employment services are not currently a focus of settlement services, that is, most employment services delivered by settlement services were coordinated as part of job preparedness or readiness programmes. The paper argues for government to ensure financial and human resources to enable SSPs to deliver services that can formally recognise and overcome barriers to humanitarian migrants' employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"40-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.353","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141687774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Aspire Social Impact Bond: How social impact bond financing can promote positive social and economic outcomes 卓望社会影响债券:社会影响债券融资如何促进积极的社会和经济成果
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.354
Veronica Coram, Selina Tually, Leanne Lester, Michael Kyron, Paul Flatau, Ian Goodwin-Smith

Financing human service delivery through social impact bonds (SIBs) is the subject of some critical commentary in the academic literature, but this tends to be largely theoretical rather than empirically based. This paper presents empirical evidence of how SIB financing can promote positive social and economic outcomes for governments, not-for-profit providers, individual service beneficiaries and society more broadly. The paper presents some of the results of an evaluation of the Aspire SIB, which financed an innovative intensive case management program providing housing and wraparound supports over a 3-year period for people experiencing chronic homelessness. Aspire participants experienced significantly improved outcomes and decreased service needs, delivering downstream cost savings across several areas of government service delivery. This paper describes how the SIB financing mechanism underpinned the success of Aspire by promoting flexible, collaborative, outcome-focussed and data-informed responses to a challenging, multi-faceted social problem.

通过社会影响债券(SIBs)为人类服务提供融资是学术文献中一些批判性评论的主题,但这些评论大多是理论性的,而不是基于经验的。本文提供了实证证据,说明社会影响债券融资如何能为政府、非营利机构、个人服务受益者以及更广泛的社会促进积极的社会和经济成果。本文介绍了 Aspire SIB 项目的部分评估结果,该项目资助了一项创新的强化个案管理计划,在 3 年时间内为长期无家可归者提供住房和全方位支持。Aspire 项目的参与者在项目成果和服务需求方面都得到了显著改善,并在政府提供服务的多个领域实现了下游成本节约。本文介绍了 SIB 融资机制如何通过促进灵活、协作、注重成果和数据信息来应对具有挑战性的多方面社会问题,从而为 Aspire 项目的成功奠定了基础。
{"title":"The Aspire Social Impact Bond: How social impact bond financing can promote positive social and economic outcomes","authors":"Veronica Coram,&nbsp;Selina Tually,&nbsp;Leanne Lester,&nbsp;Michael Kyron,&nbsp;Paul Flatau,&nbsp;Ian Goodwin-Smith","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.354","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.354","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Financing human service delivery through social impact bonds (SIBs) is the subject of some critical commentary in the academic literature, but this tends to be largely theoretical rather than empirically based. This paper presents empirical evidence of how SIB financing can promote positive social and economic outcomes for governments, not-for-profit providers, individual service beneficiaries and society more broadly. The paper presents some of the results of an evaluation of the Aspire SIB, which financed an innovative intensive case management program providing housing and wraparound supports over a 3-year period for people experiencing chronic homelessness. Aspire participants experienced significantly improved outcomes and decreased service needs, delivering downstream cost savings across several areas of government service delivery. This paper describes how the SIB financing mechanism underpinned the success of Aspire by promoting flexible, collaborative, outcome-focussed and data-informed responses to a challenging, multi-faceted social problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"176-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.354","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141713000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflections on making public policy (1977–1996) 关于制定公共政策的思考(1977-1996 年)
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.348
Brian Howe

Brian Howe was elected to the federal Parliament in 1977 as the Labor Member for Batman (now Cooper). Following the election of the Hawke Government in 1983 until his retirement from politics in 1996, Howe held several key social policy portfolios in both the Hawke and Keating Labor Governments, and was Deputy Prime Minister from 1991 to 1995. As a politician, Howe held a strong commitment to policy development and implementation. During his career as a Government Minister, he oversaw some of the most significant changes in social policy in Australian history. This article sets out his reflections on policymaking over this period.

布莱恩-豪于 1977 年当选为联邦议会蝙蝠侠(现库珀)工党议员。从 1983 年霍克政府当选到 1996 年退出政坛,豪在霍克和基廷工党政府中担任过多个重要的社会政策职务,并在 1991 年至 1995 年期间担任副总理。作为一名政治家,豪伊坚定地致力于政策的制定和实施。在担任政府部长期间,他监督了澳大利亚历史上社会政策的一些最重大变革。本文阐述了他对这一时期政策制定的思考。
{"title":"Reflections on making public policy (1977–1996)","authors":"Brian Howe","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.348","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.348","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brian Howe was elected to the federal Parliament in 1977 as the Labor Member for Batman (now Cooper). Following the election of the Hawke Government in 1983 until his retirement from politics in 1996, Howe held several key social policy portfolios in both the Hawke and Keating Labor Governments, and was Deputy Prime Minister from 1991 to 1995. As a politician, Howe held a strong commitment to policy development and implementation. During his career as a Government Minister, he oversaw some of the most significant changes in social policy in Australian history. This article sets out his reflections on policymaking over this period.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 4","pages":"905-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.348","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141699976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introducing Indigenist Critical Policy Analysis: A rights-based approach to analysing public policies and processes 介绍本土批判政策分析:分析公共政策和进程的基于权利的方法
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.350
Natalie Bryant

Institutional racism within Australia, grounded in the country's settler-colonial structure, has sidelined Indigenous interests in public policymaking since federation. In an attempt to redress this, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) was endorsed by the Australian government in 2009. UNDRIP is an authoritative international standard that could inform the ways that governments engage with Indigenous peoples and protect their rights. This paper introduces Indigenist Critical Policy Analysis (ICPA). While mainstream policy evaluation assesses whether policies and processes have met the governments stated objectives, ICPA assesses whether they uphold or violate Indigenous rights. ICPA involves reviewing policy documents against the key principles and specific Articles of UNDRIP. Presenting a worked example of ICPA, the NSW Regional Health Strategic Plan 2022–2032 is assessed against the five phases: (1) Orientation; (2) Close examination; (3) Determination; (4) Strengthening practice; and (5) Indigenous final word. This analysis finds that the Strategic Plan is poorly aligned with UNDRIP. Specifically, there is little evidence that Indigenous values influenced or held any authority in the process. ICPA offers a practical approach to analysing policy for compatibility with Indigenous rights under international law that could be used by Indigenous organisations and policymakers.

自联邦成立以来,基于澳大利亚定居者殖民结构的制度性种族主义,使土著利益在公共政策制定中处于边缘地位。为了纠正这一现象,澳大利亚政府于 2009 年批准了《联合国土著人民权利宣言》(UNDRIP)。联合国土著人民权利宣言》是一项权威性的国际标准,可为各国政府与土著人民接触并保护其权利提供参考。本文介绍土著批判政策分析 (ICPA)。主流政策评估是对政策和程序是否达到政府既定目标进行评估,而 ICPA 则是对政策和程序是否维护或侵犯土著权利进行评估。ICPA 包括根据《联合国土著人民权利宣言》的主要原则和具体条款审查政策文件。新南威尔士州《2022-2032 年地区卫生战略计划》是 ICPA 的一个实例,根据以下五个阶段进行评估:(1) 定向;(2) 仔细审查;(3) 确定;(4) 加强实践;(5) 土著定论。分析发现,《战略计划》与《联合国土著人民权利宣言》的一致性很差。具体而言,几乎没有证据表明土著价值观影响了这一进程或在这一进程中具有任何权威性。ICPA 提供了一种实用的方法来分析政策是否符合国际法规定的土著权利,可供土著组织和决策者使用。
{"title":"Introducing Indigenist Critical Policy Analysis: A rights-based approach to analysing public policies and processes","authors":"Natalie Bryant","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.350","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.350","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Institutional racism within Australia, grounded in the country's settler-colonial structure, has sidelined Indigenous interests in public policymaking since federation. In an attempt to redress this, the <i>United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples</i> (UNDRIP) was endorsed by the Australian government in 2009. UNDRIP is an authoritative international standard that could inform the ways that governments engage with Indigenous peoples and protect their rights. This paper introduces Indigenist Critical Policy Analysis (ICPA). While mainstream policy evaluation assesses whether policies and processes have met the governments stated objectives, ICPA assesses whether they uphold or violate Indigenous rights. ICPA involves reviewing policy documents against the key principles and specific Articles of UNDRIP. Presenting a worked example of ICPA, the <i>NSW Regional Health Strategic Plan 2022–2032</i> is assessed against the five phases: (1) Orientation; (2) Close examination; (3) Determination; (4) Strengthening practice; and (5) Indigenous final word. This analysis finds that the Strategic Plan is poorly aligned with UNDRIP. Specifically, there is little evidence that Indigenous values influenced or held any authority in the process. ICPA offers a practical approach to analysing policy for compatibility with Indigenous rights under international law that could be used by Indigenous organisations and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 4","pages":"824-843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.350","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141713528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Decoding the algorithmic operations of Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme 解码澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划的算法操作
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.342
Georgia van Toorn, Terry Carney

In recent years, Australia has embarked on a digital transformation of its social services, with the primary goal of creating user-centric services that are more attentive to the needs of citizens. This article examines operational and technological changes within Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) as a result of this comprehensive government digital transformation strategy. It discusses the effectiveness of these changes in enhancing outcomes for users of the scheme. Specifically, the focus is on the National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) use of algorithmic decision support systems to aid in the development of personalised support plans. This administrative process, we show, incorporates several automated elements that raise concerns about substantive fairness, accountability, transparency and participation in decision making. The conclusion drawn is that algorithmic systems exercise various forms of state power, but in this case, their subterranean administrative character positions them as “algorithmic grey holes”—spaces effectively beyond recourse to legal remedies and more suited to redress by holistic and systemic accountability reforms advocated by algorithmic justice scholarship.

近年来,澳大利亚开始对其社会服务进行数字化转型,其主要目标是创建以用户为中心的服务,更加关注公民的需求。本文考察了澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划(NDIS)的运营和技术变化,这是政府全面数字化转型战略的结果。它讨论了这些变化在提高计划用户的结果方面的有效性。具体来说,重点是国家残疾保险局(NDIA)使用算法决策支持系统来帮助制定个性化支持计划。我们表明,这一行政过程包含了几个自动化元素,这些元素引起了对决策的实质性公平性、问责制、透明度和参与的关注。得出的结论是,算法系统行使各种形式的国家权力,但在这种情况下,它们的地下行政特征将它们定位为“算法灰洞”——这些空间有效地超出了诉诸法律救济的范围,更适合通过算法正义学术倡导的整体和系统问责改革来纠正。
{"title":"Decoding the algorithmic operations of Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme","authors":"Georgia van Toorn,&nbsp;Terry Carney","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.342","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, Australia has embarked on a digital transformation of its social services, with the primary goal of creating user-centric services that are more attentive to the needs of citizens. This article examines operational and technological changes within Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) as a result of this comprehensive government digital transformation strategy. It discusses the effectiveness of these changes in enhancing outcomes for users of the scheme. Specifically, the focus is on the National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) use of algorithmic decision support systems to aid in the development of personalised support plans. This administrative process, we show, incorporates several automated elements that raise concerns about substantive fairness, accountability, transparency and participation in decision making. The conclusion drawn is that algorithmic systems exercise various forms of state power, but in this case, their subterranean administrative character positions them as “algorithmic grey holes”—spaces effectively beyond recourse to legal remedies and more suited to redress by holistic and systemic accountability reforms advocated by algorithmic justice scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"21-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.342","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143849198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability of corporal punishment and use of different parenting practices across high-income countries 体罚的可接受性以及高收入国家采用不同育儿方法的情况
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.340
Carolina Gonzalez, Alina Morawska, Daryl J. Higgins, Divna M. Haslam

Worldwide, many children experience corporal punishment. Most research on corporal punishment has focused on parents' attitudes and use of corporal punishment; however, other relevant parenting factors and practices have rarely been examined. This study explored differences among countries with various levels of progress toward a total legal ban of corporal punishment in parents' acceptability of corporal punishment, perception of parenting as a private concern, relationship with their child and parenting practices: consistency, coercive parenting, use of smacking and positive encouragement. Parents (N = 6760) of 2 to 12-year-old children from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom completed the International Parenting Survey, an online cross-sectional survey. One-way ANOVAs, and MANCOVAs (after controlling for parent age, gender and educational level), indicated significant country differences. Overall, there was no clear link between corporal punishment bans and positive parenting beliefs, practices and behaviours. The two countries where corporal punishment is banned showed different patterns. Parents in Germany showed less acceptability and use of smacking; however, parents in Spain reported the highest use of coercive parenting. Country differences suggest that beyond a legal ban, attention is needed on how to support parents to raise their children in a positive, nurturing environment.

在世界范围内,许多儿童都遭受过体罚。有关体罚的研究大多集中于父母对体罚的态度和使用情况,但很少研究其他相关的养育因素和做法。本研究探讨了不同国家在法律全面禁止体罚方面取得的进展,这些国家的家长在体罚的可接受性、将养育子女视为私事的观念、与子女的关系以及养育子女的方法(一致性、强制养育、使用打耳光和积极鼓励)等方面存在的差异。来自澳大利亚、比利时、加拿大、德国、香港、西班牙、瑞士和英国的 2 至 12 岁儿童的家长(6760 人)完成了在线横断面调查 "国际养育调查"。单因素方差分析和 MANCOVA(在控制了父母的年龄、性别和教育水平后)表明,各国之间存在显著差异。总体而言,禁止体罚与积极的育儿观念、做法和行为之间没有明显的联系。禁止体罚的两个国家呈现出不同的模式。德国的家长对抽打孩子的接受度和使用率都较低;然而,西班牙的家长则报告说,他们使用强制性教养方式的比例最高。国家之间的差异表明,除了法律禁止之外,还需要关注如何支持父母在积极的养育环境中抚养子女。
{"title":"Acceptability of corporal punishment and use of different parenting practices across high-income countries","authors":"Carolina Gonzalez,&nbsp;Alina Morawska,&nbsp;Daryl J. Higgins,&nbsp;Divna M. Haslam","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.340","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Worldwide, many children experience corporal punishment. Most research on corporal punishment has focused on parents' attitudes and use of corporal punishment; however, other relevant parenting factors and practices have rarely been examined. This study explored differences among countries with various levels of progress toward a total legal ban of corporal punishment in parents' acceptability of corporal punishment, perception of parenting as a private concern, relationship with their child and parenting practices: consistency, coercive parenting, use of smacking and positive encouragement. Parents (<i>N</i> = 6760) of 2 to 12-year-old children from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom completed the International Parenting Survey, an online cross-sectional survey. One-way ANOVAs, and MANCOVAs (after controlling for parent age, gender and educational level), indicated significant country differences. Overall, there was no clear link between corporal punishment bans and positive parenting beliefs, practices and behaviours. The two countries where corporal punishment is banned showed different patterns. Parents in Germany showed less acceptability and use of smacking; however, parents in Spain reported the highest use of coercive parenting. Country differences suggest that beyond a legal ban, attention is needed on how to support parents to raise their children in a positive, nurturing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 3","pages":"648-666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.340","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142435912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Training and supervision of disability support workers: Perspectives of NDIS participants using unregistered providers 残疾支持工作者的培训和监督:使用未注册提供者的NDIS参与者的观点
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.347
Raelene West, Sophie Yates, Helen Dickinson

Training and supervision of disability support workers (DSWs) has, in most developed countries, been the primary means of supporting quality of service, adequate worker skill and prevention of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of both service users and DSWs. However, in Australia, there is no requirement for DSWs to obtain a minimum level qualification. This paper examines service user perception and decision making in relation to training and supervision of their DSWs. We report findings from semi-structured interviews with 30 National Disability Insurance Scheme participants. These findings suggest that users of disability services do not universally prioritise formal DSW supervision and training. Many interviewees described that being able to train and supervise DSWs themselves achieved better support outcomes and reduced power differentials in receipt of services. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of recent policy reviews and the need to refocus safeguarding schemes on providing people with disability with the tools they need to ensure the quality and safety of their services.

在大多数发达国家,培训和监督残疾支助工作者(DSWs)一直是支持服务质量、适当的工人技能和防止对服务使用者和DSWs的暴力、虐待、忽视和剥削的主要手段。然而,在澳大利亚,dsw没有要求获得最低水平的资格。本文探讨了服务使用者对培训和监督其DSWs的看法和决策。我们报告了对30名国家残疾保险计划参与者的半结构化访谈的结果。这些发现表明,残疾服务的使用者并没有普遍优先考虑正式的社会福利监督和培训。许多受访者表示,能够亲自培训和监督社会福利署署长,可以取得更好的支援效果,并减少在接受服务方面的权力差异。我们在最近的政策审查的背景下讨论了这些发现的含义,以及需要重新关注保障计划,为残疾人提供他们需要的工具,以确保其服务的质量和安全。
{"title":"Training and supervision of disability support workers: Perspectives of NDIS participants using unregistered providers","authors":"Raelene West,&nbsp;Sophie Yates,&nbsp;Helen Dickinson","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.347","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Training and supervision of disability support workers (DSWs) has, in most developed countries, been the primary means of supporting quality of service, adequate worker skill and prevention of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of both service users and DSWs. However, in Australia, there is no requirement for DSWs to obtain a minimum level qualification. This paper examines service user perception and decision making in relation to training and supervision of their DSWs. We report findings from semi-structured interviews with 30 National Disability Insurance Scheme participants. These findings suggest that users of disability services do not universally prioritise formal DSW supervision and training. Many interviewees described that being able to train and supervise DSWs themselves achieved better support outcomes and reduced power differentials in receipt of services. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of recent policy reviews and the need to refocus safeguarding schemes on providing people with disability with the tools they need to ensure the quality and safety of their services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"270-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.347","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143849165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond job-search theory: A value pluralist approach to conditionality in Australian employment services 超越求职理论:澳大利亚就业服务条件的价值多元主义方法
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.338
Simone Casey

This article examines the contested impact of financial sanctions on Australian employment services, with government evaluation relying on job-search theory to justify sanctions while research from sociological and psychological perspectives suggests they exacerbate labour market disadvantages and poverty. The division in perspectives reflects both methodological differences and ethical stances within scholarship. Welfare conditionality scholars propose value pluralism as an approach to reach consensus on shared policy goals across disciplines. This article engages in a simulation of the value plural approach to identify evidence gaps in the research and evaluation of sanctions and conditionality in employment services. The article identifies a research and evaluation agenda for conditionality policy, emphasising the importance of reaching a consensus to advance ethically robust policy.

本文探讨了经济制裁对澳大利亚就业服务的争议性影响,政府的评估依赖于求职理论来证明制裁的合理性,而来自社会学和心理学视角的研究则表明,经济制裁加剧了劳动力市场的劣势和贫困。视角的划分既反映了方法论上的差异,也反映了学术界的伦理立场。福利条件学者提出了价值多元主义,作为一种就跨学科的共同政策目标达成共识的方法。本文对价值多元化方法进行了模拟,以确定就业服务中的制裁和附加条件的研究与评估中存在的证据差距。文章确定了附加条件政策的研究和评估议程,强调了达成共识以推进符合道德规范的政策的重要性。
{"title":"Beyond job-search theory: A value pluralist approach to conditionality in Australian employment services","authors":"Simone Casey","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.338","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.338","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the contested impact of financial sanctions on Australian employment services, with government evaluation relying on job-search theory to justify sanctions while research from sociological and psychological perspectives suggests they exacerbate labour market disadvantages and poverty. The division in perspectives reflects both methodological differences and ethical stances within scholarship. Welfare conditionality scholars propose value pluralism as an approach to reach consensus on shared policy goals across disciplines. This article engages in a simulation of the value plural approach to identify evidence gaps in the research and evaluation of sanctions and conditionality in employment services. The article identifies a research and evaluation agenda for conditionality policy, emphasising the importance of reaching a consensus to advance ethically robust policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"112-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.338","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141117155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are Australian students' academic skills declining? Interrogating 25 years of national and international standardised assessment data 澳大利亚学生的学术技能在下降吗?对 25 年来的国家和国际标准化评估数据进行分析
IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.341
Sally A. Larsen

Standardised tests of academic basic skills are an established feature of contemporary Australian schooling. Assessment results are widely reported and directly influence educational policymaking. Furthermore, Australian national educational priorities are linked to educational system accountability via the results of standardised tests. Given the influence and importance of assessment data, this paper aimed to collate publicly available data from four assessment programmes undertaken by Australian students, and document long-term trends in average achievement across all available assessments. Results are reported from three international assessments, the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), along with the only Australian assessment, the National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy. Of these four, only PISA demonstrated systematic declines in average scores over time. For the remaining three programmes, results in the primary school years showed initial improvements that were subsequently maintained over remaining iterations of the tests. In secondary school, students' average results neither declined nor increased appreciably over time. The consensus of the four largest assessment programmes undertaken by Australian students since 1995 thus fails to support the prevailing narrative of a broadscale decline in academic skills attainment.

学术基本技能标准化测试是当代澳大利亚学校教育的一个既定特点。评估结果被广泛报道,并直接影响教育决策。此外,澳大利亚的国家教育优先事项也通过标准化测试的结果与教育系统的问责制联系在一起。鉴于评估数据的影响力和重要性,本文旨在整理澳大利亚学生参加的四项评估计划的公开数据,并记录所有可用评估的平均成绩的长期趋势。本文报告了三项国际评估的结果,即 "国际阅读能力研究进展"(Progress in International Reading Literacy Study)、"国际数学与科学发展趋势研究"(Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study)和 "国际学生评估项目"(Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA),以及澳大利亚唯一一项评估,即 "国家评估项目"(National Assessment Program):在这四项评估中,只有 "国际学生评估项目"(PISA)的评估结果与澳大利亚的评估结果一致。在这四项评估中,只有国际学生评估项目的平均分随着时间的推移出现了系统性的下降。至于其余三个项目,小学阶段的结果显示出最初的进步,并在随后的测试中得以保持。在中学阶段,学生的平均成绩既没有下降,也没有明显上升。因此,自 1995 年以来,澳大利亚学生参加的四个最大的评估项目所取得的共识,并不支持关于学术技能水平普遍下降的普遍说法。
{"title":"Are Australian students' academic skills declining? Interrogating 25 years of national and international standardised assessment data","authors":"Sally A. Larsen","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.341","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.341","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Standardised tests of academic basic skills are an established feature of contemporary Australian schooling. Assessment results are widely reported and directly influence educational policymaking. Furthermore, Australian national educational priorities are linked to educational system accountability via the results of standardised tests. Given the influence and importance of assessment data, this paper aimed to collate publicly available data from four assessment programmes undertaken by Australian students, and document long-term trends in average achievement across all available assessments. Results are reported from three international assessments, the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), along with the only Australian assessment, the National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy. Of these four, only PISA demonstrated systematic declines in average scores over time. For the remaining three programmes, results in the primary school years showed initial improvements that were subsequently maintained over remaining iterations of the tests. In secondary school, students' average results neither declined nor increased appreciably over time. The consensus of the four largest assessment programmes undertaken by Australian students since 1995 thus fails to support the prevailing narrative of a broadscale decline in academic skills attainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"302-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.341","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141116602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Varieties of digitalisation? A comparison of employment services digitalisation in the UK and Australia 数字化的多样性?英国和澳大利亚就业服务数字化比较
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.339
Jo Ingold, Chris Forde, David Robertshaw

This article examines the digitalisation of employment services in the UK and Australia, countries that have been on similar policy trajectories with respect to the development of quasi-markets and increased digitalisation. The article deploys comparative mixed methods comprising surveys of employment service providers and interviews with providers and technology developers in both countries to analyse the extent of, forms and challenges around digitalisation across both countries. The survey data analysis suggested considerable similarities in the UK and Australia regarding the drivers of digitalisation and the tasks which were digitalised. However, the interview data highlighted some differences between the two countries, including the persistence of face-to-face delivery in the UK compared with accelerated digitalisation in Australia. In both countries, there were clear differing motivations between stakeholder communities (policymakers and developers), which providers had to negotiate.

英国和澳大利亚在发展准市场和加强数字化方面有着相似的政策轨迹,本文研究了这两个国家的就业服务数字化情况。文章采用混合比较方法,包括对两国就业服务提供商的调查以及对提供商和技术开发人员的访谈,分析了两国数字化的程度、形式和挑战。调查数据分析显示,英国和澳大利亚在数字化的驱动因素和数字化的任务方面有相当多的相似之处。然而,访谈数据突出显示了两国之间的一些差异,包括英国坚持面对面提供服务,而澳大利亚则加快了数字化进程。在这两个国家,利益相关者群体(政策制定者和开发者)之间存在明显的动机差异,提供者必须对此进行协商。
{"title":"Varieties of digitalisation? A comparison of employment services digitalisation in the UK and Australia","authors":"Jo Ingold,&nbsp;Chris Forde,&nbsp;David Robertshaw","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.339","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajs4.339","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the digitalisation of employment services in the UK and Australia, countries that have been on similar policy trajectories with respect to the development of quasi-markets and increased digitalisation. The article deploys comparative mixed methods comprising surveys of employment service providers and interviews with providers and technology developers in both countries to analyse the extent of, forms and challenges around digitalisation across both countries. The survey data analysis suggested considerable similarities in the UK and Australia regarding the drivers of digitalisation and the tasks which were digitalised. However, the interview data highlighted some differences between the two countries, including the persistence of face-to-face delivery in the UK compared with accelerated digitalisation in Australia. In both countries, there were clear differing motivations between stakeholder communities (policymakers and developers), which providers had to negotiate.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 2","pages":"384-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.339","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141000575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Australian Journal of Social Issues
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1