Pub Date : 2023-10-18DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2261475
Georg Wolfmayr
Various scholars have noticed the increase of competition in the last decades and its essential role in contemporary social life. Their studies show the great variety of fields affected and are valuable contributions to understanding this process. However, they also represent a wide range of different conceptualizations and understandings of what exactly the increase of competition is and which aspects of social life it affects. Thus, to allow for a better understanding of this process and the commonalities and differences between the approaches that examine it, this paper presents a framework to grasp different dimensions of competitization, that is, the increase of competition in different social fields. Drawing on the basic elements of competition and the literature on the increase of competition, it discusses four dimensions of competitization: competitization by scarcity, by mechanism, by imaginary and by agency. Three main examples are used to demonstrate these dimensions: competitization in academia, market competitization and competitization in the form of rankings.
{"title":"Competitization: the proliferation of competition as a multidimensional process","authors":"Georg Wolfmayr","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2261475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2261475","url":null,"abstract":"Various scholars have noticed the increase of competition in the last decades and its essential role in contemporary social life. Their studies show the great variety of fields affected and are valuable contributions to understanding this process. However, they also represent a wide range of different conceptualizations and understandings of what exactly the increase of competition is and which aspects of social life it affects. Thus, to allow for a better understanding of this process and the commonalities and differences between the approaches that examine it, this paper presents a framework to grasp different dimensions of competitization, that is, the increase of competition in different social fields. Drawing on the basic elements of competition and the literature on the increase of competition, it discusses four dimensions of competitization: competitization by scarcity, by mechanism, by imaginary and by agency. Three main examples are used to demonstrate these dimensions: competitization in academia, market competitization and competitization in the form of rankings.","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135883382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-14DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2258887
Samantha Breslin
ABSTRACTWhat does it mean to produce trustworthy code for computer scientists? Based primarily on ethnographic fieldwork in an undergraduate computer science program in Singapore, this article explores what it means for computer science students to write ‘good code.’ In doing so, it explores the values that underlie ideas of trust in the computer science discipline. Drawing on the work of Rebecca Bryant, this article shows how, as students learn to become ‘good at’ writing code that is technically functional, aesthetically un-individuated, and decontextually efficient, they also learn to become ‘good’ computer scientists. These standards of good code are distributed across human and nonhuman actors and provide a framework for ‘trustless trust’ in code. That is, while computer science often assumes an omnipresence of mistrust, this article argues that the production of ‘good’ code and ‘good’ computer scientists works to build a system of distrust for computer scientists. At the same time, becoming a good computer scientist is intimately intertwined with students’ selfhoods, undermining the foundation of trustless trust even as the ideal of objectively ‘good’ and trustworthy code cuts this contradiction from view.KEYWORDS: Computer scienceeducationtrustpersonhoodcode AcknowledgementsThank you to students, professors, and administrators who contributed to this research. Thank you also to James Maguire, Kristoffer Albris, the two anonymous reviewers, Benjamin Staple, and the Code Ethnography Collective (CECO) for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving this article, and to Robin Whitaker for her support and guidance throughout my MA and PhD.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Research for this article was approved by Memorial University of Newfoundland's Interdisciplinary Committee on Ethics in Human Research (#20140328-AR). Consent for participant observation in classes was obtained from the professor(s) and all students in the class were provided information in writing about my research and provided the opportunity to withdraw. Consent was otherwise negotiated and obtained on an individual basis. Some examples above are also discussed in my dissertation (Breslin Citation2018).2 Pseudonyms are used throughout both for the name of the university where I conducted research and for research participants.3 I have also drawn methodological insight from this research, alongside literature from feminist technology studies, in considering the multiple facets of education and subject-formation that need to be explored (see also Forsythe Citation2001; Fife Citation2005; Mackenzie Citation2006; Suchman Citation2007; Kho Citation2013).4 The Thompson Hack is explained in detail by Allen (Citation2021), but briefly it introduces a backdoor and self-replicating piece of code (combined, making the ‘hack’) into the compiler via the machine-level code. The combination makes it next to impossible to
{"title":"Computing trust: on writing ‘good’ code in computer science education","authors":"Samantha Breslin","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2258887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2258887","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhat does it mean to produce trustworthy code for computer scientists? Based primarily on ethnographic fieldwork in an undergraduate computer science program in Singapore, this article explores what it means for computer science students to write ‘good code.’ In doing so, it explores the values that underlie ideas of trust in the computer science discipline. Drawing on the work of Rebecca Bryant, this article shows how, as students learn to become ‘good at’ writing code that is technically functional, aesthetically un-individuated, and decontextually efficient, they also learn to become ‘good’ computer scientists. These standards of good code are distributed across human and nonhuman actors and provide a framework for ‘trustless trust’ in code. That is, while computer science often assumes an omnipresence of mistrust, this article argues that the production of ‘good’ code and ‘good’ computer scientists works to build a system of distrust for computer scientists. At the same time, becoming a good computer scientist is intimately intertwined with students’ selfhoods, undermining the foundation of trustless trust even as the ideal of objectively ‘good’ and trustworthy code cuts this contradiction from view.KEYWORDS: Computer scienceeducationtrustpersonhoodcode AcknowledgementsThank you to students, professors, and administrators who contributed to this research. Thank you also to James Maguire, Kristoffer Albris, the two anonymous reviewers, Benjamin Staple, and the Code Ethnography Collective (CECO) for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving this article, and to Robin Whitaker for her support and guidance throughout my MA and PhD.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Research for this article was approved by Memorial University of Newfoundland's Interdisciplinary Committee on Ethics in Human Research (#20140328-AR). Consent for participant observation in classes was obtained from the professor(s) and all students in the class were provided information in writing about my research and provided the opportunity to withdraw. Consent was otherwise negotiated and obtained on an individual basis. Some examples above are also discussed in my dissertation (Breslin Citation2018).2 Pseudonyms are used throughout both for the name of the university where I conducted research and for research participants.3 I have also drawn methodological insight from this research, alongside literature from feminist technology studies, in considering the multiple facets of education and subject-formation that need to be explored (see also Forsythe Citation2001; Fife Citation2005; Mackenzie Citation2006; Suchman Citation2007; Kho Citation2013).4 The Thompson Hack is explained in detail by Allen (Citation2021), but briefly it introduces a backdoor and self-replicating piece of code (combined, making the ‘hack’) into the compiler via the machine-level code. The combination makes it next to impossible to ","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135804152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2246987
Thorsten Peetz
ABSTRACTDating apps are valuation devices that people use to set up and valuate digital identities. Building a profile is a first move in a valuation game that contributes to intimate valorization of persons and elicits valuations by other members of a dating platform. This article contributes to the analysis of valuation in intimate life by analyzing profile texts as documents of dating practice. Using data from 1004 profiles collected in Berlin, Germany, it shows that profile texts formally resemble personal ads and identifies three rules of doing digital dating: Users identify the dating self by describing who they are, what they do and what they like; they valorize the self by references to valuation criteria that indicate what counts as valuable or worthy; and they do so by using the list as a medium.KEYWORDS: Valuationvaluation gamesonline datingdating appsdocumentary method Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Vatin (Citation2013, 31) suggested to distinguish two dimensions of ‘valuation’ as ‘valorizing’ – the ‘production of value’ – and ‘evaluating’ – the ‘assessment of value’ – , a distinction that was taken up by Michèle Lamont (Citation2012) in her influential article on the sociology of ‘valuation and evaluation’ (see also Krüger Citation2022). While I agree with critics of this distinction like Callon (Citation2013, 267f.) and Heinich (Citation2020, 77) that measurement always implies the attribution of value – Heinich (Citation2017, 26ff) identifies measurement as one form of attributing worth among others –, it is helpful in this particular case for distinguishing two aspects of the dating process: setting up a profile with the focus on attributing value to an identity and assessing the value signals implemented in the profile.2 As an exception to this common practice of abstaining from the presentation of quantified values, OkCupid presents users with a number signifying the percentage of compatibility with the other user – and notably not a global estimate of a profile’s intimate value.3 Contrary to this literature, I hold that the concept of ‘game’ is helpful for analyzing social life in more general terms: discussions about ‘gamification’ refer to one historical version of how dating games are played.4 On compensated dating and the boundary work that distinguishes it from sex work, see Nayar (Citation2017).5 For an example of different cultures of dating in an ‘analogue’ setting, see Krause and Kowalski (Citation2013) on dating in Berlin and New York.Additional informationNotes on contributorsThorsten PeetzThorsten Peetz is Privatdozent of sociology at the University of Bremen and currently Interim Professor of Sociological Theory at the University of Bamberg. He studies processes of valuation in intimate and religious games as well as processes of digitalization.
{"title":"Intimate valuation devices: Doing valuation while doing dating in Tinder texts","authors":"Thorsten Peetz","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2246987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2246987","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDating apps are valuation devices that people use to set up and valuate digital identities. Building a profile is a first move in a valuation game that contributes to intimate valorization of persons and elicits valuations by other members of a dating platform. This article contributes to the analysis of valuation in intimate life by analyzing profile texts as documents of dating practice. Using data from 1004 profiles collected in Berlin, Germany, it shows that profile texts formally resemble personal ads and identifies three rules of doing digital dating: Users identify the dating self by describing who they are, what they do and what they like; they valorize the self by references to valuation criteria that indicate what counts as valuable or worthy; and they do so by using the list as a medium.KEYWORDS: Valuationvaluation gamesonline datingdating appsdocumentary method Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Vatin (Citation2013, 31) suggested to distinguish two dimensions of ‘valuation’ as ‘valorizing’ – the ‘production of value’ – and ‘evaluating’ – the ‘assessment of value’ – , a distinction that was taken up by Michèle Lamont (Citation2012) in her influential article on the sociology of ‘valuation and evaluation’ (see also Krüger Citation2022). While I agree with critics of this distinction like Callon (Citation2013, 267f.) and Heinich (Citation2020, 77) that measurement always implies the attribution of value – Heinich (Citation2017, 26ff) identifies measurement as one form of attributing worth among others –, it is helpful in this particular case for distinguishing two aspects of the dating process: setting up a profile with the focus on attributing value to an identity and assessing the value signals implemented in the profile.2 As an exception to this common practice of abstaining from the presentation of quantified values, OkCupid presents users with a number signifying the percentage of compatibility with the other user – and notably not a global estimate of a profile’s intimate value.3 Contrary to this literature, I hold that the concept of ‘game’ is helpful for analyzing social life in more general terms: discussions about ‘gamification’ refer to one historical version of how dating games are played.4 On compensated dating and the boundary work that distinguishes it from sex work, see Nayar (Citation2017).5 For an example of different cultures of dating in an ‘analogue’ setting, see Krause and Kowalski (Citation2013) on dating in Berlin and New York.Additional informationNotes on contributorsThorsten PeetzThorsten Peetz is Privatdozent of sociology at the University of Bremen and currently Interim Professor of Sociological Theory at the University of Bamberg. He studies processes of valuation in intimate and religious games as well as processes of digitalization.","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135350573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2258909
Laurence Barry
ABSTRACTOver the second half of the twentieth century, the moral economy of insurance has shifted from solidarity and mutual support to individual responsibility. In this context, the French regime for the protection against natural catastrophes that took shape in the 1980s exemplifies a strong and almost anachronical political will to foster solidarity at the national level, thus questioning the moral economy of responsibility. This paper offers a textual analysis of the official debates that led to the launch of the regime. It shows how the representatives chose to separate compensation, financed by equal individual participation, from state prevention. This contrasts with other schemes worldwide that rely on rational decision theory to situate the responsibility for prevention at the individual level. In this alternative, risk-based premiums play a theoretically crucial role in risk signals. In practice, however, they lead to affordability issues while failing to govern prevention as theoretically expected. With the climate crisis exacerbating this phenomenon, the examination of the French regime thus allows to fruitfully revive other moral economies of insurance.KEYWORDS: Natural disasterssolidarityresponsibilitypreventioninsurance AknowledgementI wish to thank Andy Rosenhek, Thierry Cohignac, Antoine Quantin and four anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments on previous versions of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 For a conceptual and historical analysis, see Baker 1996.2 Respectively: Fonds de secours aux victimes de sinistres et calamités and Fonds National de Garantie des Calamités Agricoles. The latter still operates on non-insurable damages to specifically agricultural properties.3 The process of finalizing a law in France has several stages: once an initial text has been proposed, it is discussed and amended by both parliamentary chambers (National Assembly and Senate) separately. For this purpose, each chamber nominates a commission in charge of studying the proposal of the other chamber and formulating amendments to the text of law. The Assembly or the Senate then discuss the former report, and the amended text goes back to the other chamber for further discussion and approval. This can imply a series of back and forth between the two chambers. If the two chambers cannot agree on a formulation after two readings of each, they nominate a mixed commission with members of both parliaments in order to reach an agreement. This happened in the case of the CatNat regime law.4 All the translations of official texts are mine.5 Other than national schemes relying on traditional insurance products, other mechanisms for climate risk mitigation are emerging such as index or parametric insurance, and cat bonds (Johnson Citation2020; Booth Citation2020), which are out of the scope of this paper.6 Symptomatically, I want to argue, Christophers (Citation2019) quotes a passage
20世纪下半叶，保险道德经济从团结互助转向个人责任。在这方面，20世纪80年代形成的法国自然灾害保护制度体现了一种强烈的、几乎不合时宜的政治意愿，即在国家一级促进团结，从而质疑责任的道德经济。本文对导致该政权成立的官方辩论进行了文本分析。它显示了代表们是如何选择将由个人平等参与资助的赔偿与国家预防分开的。这与世界上其他依靠理性决策理论将预防责任置于个人层面的方案形成对比。在这种替代方案中，基于风险的溢价理论上在风险信号中起着至关重要的作用。然而，在实践中，它们导致了可负担性问题，同时未能像理论上预期的那样管理预防工作。由于气候危机加剧了这一现象，因此，对法国政权的审视使其他道德保险经济得以富有成效地复苏。我要感谢Andy Rosenhek, Thierry Cohignac, Antoine Quantin和四位匿名审稿人对本文之前版本的见解和评论。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1关于概念和历史分析，分别见Baker 1996年2月2日:寻求和受害者的档案和国家档案:农业的档案。后者仍然适用于对具体农业财产的不可保险损害在法国，法律定稿的过程有几个阶段:一旦提出初步案文，就由议会两院(国民议会和参议院)分别讨论和修改。为此目的，每一议院提名一个委员会，负责研究另一议院的提案和拟订对法律案文的修正案。随后，议会或参议院讨论前一份报告，修改后的文本再提交另一议院进一步讨论和批准。这可能意味着两个腔室之间的一系列来回。如果两院在各自阅读两遍后仍不能达成一致，他们将提名一个由两国议会成员组成的混合委员会，以达成协议。这发生在卡特政权法的案例中所有官方文本的翻译都是我的除了依靠传统保险产品的国家计划外，正在出现其他缓解气候风险的机制，如指数或参数保险以及cat债券(Johnson Citation2020;Booth Citation2020)，这些都不在本文的研究范围之内从症状上讲，我想说，Christophers (Citation2019)引用了Crichton (Citation2005)的一段话，这段话似乎把责任归咎于补贴(“规划者和开发商(已经)将廉价洪水保险的持续可用性视为理所当然”)，而Christon的主要论点是“非结构性措施，如规划控制和可持续排水”应该是首选的解决方案(Crichton citation2005,5，重点添加)从2022年4月开始，一项新的费率改革(仍在努力提高风险的准确性)正在实施中，其结果尚未公布(Horn Citation2022)此外，由于封面包含了一系列灾难，所有社区都面临着这样或那样的危险。因此，CCR最近宣布，在该政权存在的前40年里，99%的社区受益于该政权(' Citation40 Ans Du r gime #CatNat FR ' Citation2022)。本研究得到了欧洲金融基金会巴黎研究所主席项目“大数据风险与技术评估:结果与结果”的支持。劳伦斯·巴里(lawrence Barry)是巴黎理工学院(ENSAE/巴黎政治学院)的联合主席，耶路撒冷希伯来大学的副讲师和精算师。她感兴趣的主题是新自由主义、福柯式研究、特定理性与现代权力的交织以及它最近的数字化转变。她目前在PARI的研究项目涉及大数据对“保险协会”的影响。她的文章曾发表在《商业伦理》、《大数据与社会》和《理论、文化与社会》杂志上。她的书《福柯与后现代理性概念》于2020年出版。
{"title":"The moral economies of natural disasters insurance: solidarity or individual responsibility?","authors":"Laurence Barry","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2258909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2258909","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOver the second half of the twentieth century, the moral economy of insurance has shifted from solidarity and mutual support to individual responsibility. In this context, the French regime for the protection against natural catastrophes that took shape in the 1980s exemplifies a strong and almost anachronical political will to foster solidarity at the national level, thus questioning the moral economy of responsibility. This paper offers a textual analysis of the official debates that led to the launch of the regime. It shows how the representatives chose to separate compensation, financed by equal individual participation, from state prevention. This contrasts with other schemes worldwide that rely on rational decision theory to situate the responsibility for prevention at the individual level. In this alternative, risk-based premiums play a theoretically crucial role in risk signals. In practice, however, they lead to affordability issues while failing to govern prevention as theoretically expected. With the climate crisis exacerbating this phenomenon, the examination of the French regime thus allows to fruitfully revive other moral economies of insurance.KEYWORDS: Natural disasterssolidarityresponsibilitypreventioninsurance AknowledgementI wish to thank Andy Rosenhek, Thierry Cohignac, Antoine Quantin and four anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments on previous versions of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 For a conceptual and historical analysis, see Baker 1996.2 Respectively: Fonds de secours aux victimes de sinistres et calamités and Fonds National de Garantie des Calamités Agricoles. The latter still operates on non-insurable damages to specifically agricultural properties.3 The process of finalizing a law in France has several stages: once an initial text has been proposed, it is discussed and amended by both parliamentary chambers (National Assembly and Senate) separately. For this purpose, each chamber nominates a commission in charge of studying the proposal of the other chamber and formulating amendments to the text of law. The Assembly or the Senate then discuss the former report, and the amended text goes back to the other chamber for further discussion and approval. This can imply a series of back and forth between the two chambers. If the two chambers cannot agree on a formulation after two readings of each, they nominate a mixed commission with members of both parliaments in order to reach an agreement. This happened in the case of the CatNat regime law.4 All the translations of official texts are mine.5 Other than national schemes relying on traditional insurance products, other mechanisms for climate risk mitigation are emerging such as index or parametric insurance, and cat bonds (Johnson Citation2020; Booth Citation2020), which are out of the scope of this paper.6 Symptomatically, I want to argue, Christophers (Citation2019) quotes a passage","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135351410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-12DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2246991
Christopher Gad
{"title":"Trusting elections: complexities and risks of digital voting in Denmark","authors":"Christopher Gad","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2246991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2246991","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135879322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-12DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2246985
Jessica M. Mulligan
{"title":"Fractured insurance families: securing care and navigating financialized social protections","authors":"Jessica M. Mulligan","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2246985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2246985","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135879493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-07DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2246988
Chang-hong Chen, Renyi Hong
{"title":"Business of involution: self-study rooms and work culture in China","authors":"Chang-hong Chen, Renyi Hong","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2246988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2246988","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"134 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89439017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-04DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2225525
Riom Loïc
{"title":"‘A video or a flat fee?’ on the performances of concert fees","authors":"Riom Loïc","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2225525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2225525","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82813714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-04DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2246984
Grace Tang
{"title":"From ‘take-ism’ to pursuit of newness and originality: design professionals and models of creativity in contemporary China","authors":"Grace Tang","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2246984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2246984","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81135172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-04DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2229335
Ola Gunhildrud Berta
{"title":"Culture or commerce? Craft as an ambiguous construction between culture and economy","authors":"Ola Gunhildrud Berta","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2023.2229335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2229335","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87011891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：