Inherited genetic conditions are family diseases. They affect consanguineous relatives, in lineage for several generations, and impact the family dynamics. Older generations have been considered highly influential in the health management of families with inherited genetic conditions. To our knowledge, no reviews so far addressed the health-related roles of older generations in these families. This scoping review aims to fill that gap by mapping the existent research about the health-roles roles performed by the older generations in families living with autosomal dominant inherited genetic conditions. Four electronic databases were searched: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycInfo. Eleven studies were included, and relevant findings were extracted. Main roles included: informers vs. blockers of disease-related information; encouragers vs. discouragers of health screening or genetic testing; (non-)supporters; and role models in living and coping with the disease. The roles played by older generations are relevant to the health management of other family members and can be beneficial to themselves (reciprocal interactions). Acknowledging and understanding these roles is important for professionals and health-services. Results suggest the relevance of an intergenerational perspective when working with families with inherited genetic conditions.
遗传性疾病是家族性疾病。它们会影响到几代同堂的近亲,并影响到家庭的活力。老一辈人被认为对遗传性疾病家庭的健康管理有很大影响。据我们所知,迄今为止还没有任何综述涉及老一辈人在这些家庭中与健康相关的作用。本综述旨在通过对常染色体显性遗传疾病家庭中老一辈人在健康方面所扮演角色的现有研究进行梳理,从而填补这一空白。我们检索了四个电子数据库:Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed 和 PsycInfo。共纳入 11 项研究,并提取了相关结果。主要角色包括:疾病相关信息的告知者与阻止者;健康筛查或基因检测的鼓励者与阻止者;(非)支持者;以及生活和应对疾病的榜样。老一辈所扮演的角色与其他家庭成员的健康管理息息相关,对他们自己也有好处(互惠互动)。承认和理解这些角色对于专业人员和医疗服务机构来说非常重要。研究结果表明,在与患有遗传性疾病的家庭合作时,代际观点非常重要。
{"title":"Health-related roles of older generations in families with inherited genetic conditions: a scoping review.","authors":"Carla Roma Oliveira, Catarina Seidi, Jorge Sequeiros, Liliana Sousa, Álvaro Mendes","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00713-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00713-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inherited genetic conditions are family diseases. They affect consanguineous relatives, in lineage for several generations, and impact the family dynamics. Older generations have been considered highly influential in the health management of families with inherited genetic conditions. To our knowledge, no reviews so far addressed the health-related roles of older generations in these families. This scoping review aims to fill that gap by mapping the existent research about the health-roles roles performed by the older generations in families living with autosomal dominant inherited genetic conditions. Four electronic databases were searched: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycInfo. Eleven studies were included, and relevant findings were extracted. Main roles included: informers vs. blockers of disease-related information; encouragers vs. discouragers of health screening or genetic testing; (non-)supporters; and role models in living and coping with the disease. The roles played by older generations are relevant to the health management of other family members and can be beneficial to themselves (reciprocal interactions). Acknowledging and understanding these roles is important for professionals and health-services. Results suggest the relevance of an intergenerational perspective when working with families with inherited genetic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"351-361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411034/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141097138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00717-8
José D Pereira, Catarina Costa, Andreia Santos, Marina S Lemos, Jorge Sequeiros, Milena Paneque, Álvaro Mendes
This study is the first to explore the psychosocial experience of young Portuguese adults at genetic risk for hereditary amyloid transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN). The work focuses on the developmental peculiarities of their experience with the disease. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with young adults coming for pre-symptomatic testing (PST) at a single genetics outpatient center in Portugal. The data were analyzed qualitatively. The main findings suggest that four themes mark the psychosocial experience of the young adults interviewed. The first refers to the development of psychological representations, namely beliefs, mental representations, and social perceptions about hATTR-PN. The second regards the experienced and anticipated psychosocial impacts, namely, suffering, anxiety, and relief related to the disease. The third is related to using strategies such as performing PST, strategies focused on emotional regulation and the meaning of hATTR-PN, and social strategies to deal with these impacts over time. Finally, the fourth aspect concerns the perceived and expected support for the participants' needs provided by social contexts, that is, family and genetic counseling. In a period of life also marked by qualitatively different characteristics and developmental tasks from other life cycle stages (e.g., identity explorations, instability, and independent decision-making), experience with the disease can add psychosocial challenges to young adults at risk for hATTR-PN. Genetic counseling practices and health policies can be optimized to respond to the psychosocial needs of young adults. Future research should deepen the understanding of the psychosocial experience of individuals and families with late-onset hATTR-PN to improve the clinical response in this population.
{"title":"\"Living with a question mark\": psychosocial experience of Portuguese young adults at risk for hereditary amyloid transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.","authors":"José D Pereira, Catarina Costa, Andreia Santos, Marina S Lemos, Jorge Sequeiros, Milena Paneque, Álvaro Mendes","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00717-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00717-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study is the first to explore the psychosocial experience of young Portuguese adults at genetic risk for hereditary amyloid transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN). The work focuses on the developmental peculiarities of their experience with the disease. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with young adults coming for pre-symptomatic testing (PST) at a single genetics outpatient center in Portugal. The data were analyzed qualitatively. The main findings suggest that four themes mark the psychosocial experience of the young adults interviewed. The first refers to the development of psychological representations, namely beliefs, mental representations, and social perceptions about hATTR-PN. The second regards the experienced and anticipated psychosocial impacts, namely, suffering, anxiety, and relief related to the disease. The third is related to using strategies such as performing PST, strategies focused on emotional regulation and the meaning of hATTR-PN, and social strategies to deal with these impacts over time. Finally, the fourth aspect concerns the perceived and expected support for the participants' needs provided by social contexts, that is, family and genetic counseling. In a period of life also marked by qualitatively different characteristics and developmental tasks from other life cycle stages (e.g., identity explorations, instability, and independent decision-making), experience with the disease can add psychosocial challenges to young adults at risk for hATTR-PN. Genetic counseling practices and health policies can be optimized to respond to the psychosocial needs of young adults. Future research should deepen the understanding of the psychosocial experience of individuals and families with late-onset hATTR-PN to improve the clinical response in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"401-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411036/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141555633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00714-x
Paloma Brun, Boris Groisman, María Paz Bidondo, Pablo Barbero, Marianela Trotta, Rosa Liascovich
Congenital anomalies (CA) encompass all morphological or functional alterations originating prenatally and present at birth. The prenatal diagnosis of these anomalies can significantly impact the overall health of the pregnant individual and may influence her decision regarding the continuation of the pregnancy. In contexts where safe pregnancy termination is not guaranteed by the state, it can lead to unsafe procedures with severe consequences. In our research, we analyzed epidemiological information on CA to develop potential indicators of inequity in access to safe abortion prior to the legalization of legal termination of pregnancy in Argentina. We included cases from 13 public hospitals and 9 non-public subsector hospitals, from the period 2013-2020. Two groups of specific CA were selected: 1) CA capable of being prenatally diagnosed, and 2) CA related to vascular disruptive events. 10/18 of the selected CA capable of being prenatally diagnosed had a significantly higher prevalence in public hospitals (anencephaly, encephalocele, spina bifida, microcephaly, hydrocephalus, holoprosencephaly, hydranencephaly, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, bilateral renal agenesis). Non public hospitals had higher prenatal detection. Birth prevalence of CA related with vascular disruptive events (limb reduction, Moebius syndrome, amniotic band sequence) were significantly higher in public hospitals. These results suggest disparities in access to prenatal diagnosis and safe abortion based on socioeconomic status. There was a significant gap in access to prenatal diagnosis for CA and possibly to safe elective abortion depending on the type of institution (public vs. non-public).
先天性畸形(Congenital anomalies,CA)包括所有源自产前并在出生时出现的形态或功能改变。这些异常的产前诊断会对孕妇的整体健康产生重大影响,并可能影响其是否继续妊娠的决定。在安全终止妊娠得不到国家保障的情况下,可能会导致不安全的手术,造成严重后果。在我们的研究中,我们分析了有关 CA 的流行病学信息,以制定在阿根廷合法终止妊娠合法化之前安全堕胎机会不平等的潜在指标。我们纳入了 2013-2020 年间 13 家公立医院和 9 家非公立分部门医院的病例。我们选取了两组特定的CA:1)可在产前确诊的CA;2)与血管破坏事件相关的CA。在所选的可进行产前诊断的 CA 中,10/18 在公立医院的发病率明显更高(无脑畸形、头畸形、脊柱裂、小头畸形、脑积水、全脑畸形、肾积水、膈疝、胃畸形、双侧肾发育不全)。非公立医院的产前检测率较高。与血管破坏事件(肢体缩窄、莫比乌斯综合征、羊膜带序列)相关的 CA 出生率在公立医院明显较高。这些结果表明,在获得产前诊断和安全堕胎方面,社会经济地位存在差异。不同类型的机构(公立与非公立)在获得 CA 产前诊断和安全选择性人工流产方面存在明显差距。
{"title":"Prevalence of congenital anomalies and prenatal diagnosis by birth institution (public vs. non-public): indicators of inequality in access to elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies.","authors":"Paloma Brun, Boris Groisman, María Paz Bidondo, Pablo Barbero, Marianela Trotta, Rosa Liascovich","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00714-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00714-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congenital anomalies (CA) encompass all morphological or functional alterations originating prenatally and present at birth. The prenatal diagnosis of these anomalies can significantly impact the overall health of the pregnant individual and may influence her decision regarding the continuation of the pregnancy. In contexts where safe pregnancy termination is not guaranteed by the state, it can lead to unsafe procedures with severe consequences. In our research, we analyzed epidemiological information on CA to develop potential indicators of inequity in access to safe abortion prior to the legalization of legal termination of pregnancy in Argentina. We included cases from 13 public hospitals and 9 non-public subsector hospitals, from the period 2013-2020. Two groups of specific CA were selected: 1) CA capable of being prenatally diagnosed, and 2) CA related to vascular disruptive events. 10/18 of the selected CA capable of being prenatally diagnosed had a significantly higher prevalence in public hospitals (anencephaly, encephalocele, spina bifida, microcephaly, hydrocephalus, holoprosencephaly, hydranencephaly, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, bilateral renal agenesis). Non public hospitals had higher prenatal detection. Birth prevalence of CA related with vascular disruptive events (limb reduction, Moebius syndrome, amniotic band sequence) were significantly higher in public hospitals. These results suggest disparities in access to prenatal diagnosis and safe abortion based on socioeconomic status. There was a significant gap in access to prenatal diagnosis for CA and possibly to safe elective abortion depending on the type of institution (public vs. non-public).</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411032/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141187056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00715-w
Janelle Skeard
Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) has a long history of resource development, exploitation, and frequent mismanagement. Even before joining the Canadian confederation in 1949, industries such as mining, fishing, and forestry had significantly shaped the province. Recently, a new "resource" has been recognized: NL's genetic data, often described as a "genetic gold mine" and "the new oil." These analogies reflect the perception of genetic data as a valuable resource, resonating in a province historically reliant on resource extraction. Since the early 2000s, NL's genetic data has been recognized as a unique asset, prompting provincial reports on its management. Renewed interest has emerged with a local biotechnology company aiming to leverage NL's unique genetic architecture. This paper examines the implications of conceptualizing genetic information as a resource, exploring how this fits within existing resource development frameworks and policies, and considering its potential to shape policies for managing the benefits and burdens of genetic data exploitation. I conclude that while the NL genome is not a natural resource in the traditional sense, the province nevertheless needs to take more direct responsibility for its development and to ensure that any potential benefits from exploiting it are shared with the population.
{"title":"\"Unnatural resources?\": parallels and distinctions between the Newfoundland Genome and traditional resource sectors.","authors":"Janelle Skeard","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00715-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00715-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) has a long history of resource development, exploitation, and frequent mismanagement. Even before joining the Canadian confederation in 1949, industries such as mining, fishing, and forestry had significantly shaped the province. Recently, a new \"resource\" has been recognized: NL's genetic data, often described as a \"genetic gold mine\" and \"the new oil.\" These analogies reflect the perception of genetic data as a valuable resource, resonating in a province historically reliant on resource extraction. Since the early 2000s, NL's genetic data has been recognized as a unique asset, prompting provincial reports on its management. Renewed interest has emerged with a local biotechnology company aiming to leverage NL's unique genetic architecture. This paper examines the implications of conceptualizing genetic information as a resource, exploring how this fits within existing resource development frameworks and policies, and considering its potential to shape policies for managing the benefits and burdens of genetic data exploitation. I conclude that while the NL genome is not a natural resource in the traditional sense, the province nevertheless needs to take more direct responsibility for its development and to ensure that any potential benefits from exploiting it are shared with the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"449-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141421389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Individuals affected with cancer predisposition (CPS) syndromes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome (LS) are at an elevated risk of multiple cancers. Identifying high-risk individuals is important if they are to access risk-reducing strategies. Interventions such as risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants or regular colonoscopy for carriers of LS P/LP variants are highly effective and reduce mortality. Despite clear evidence that the identification of at-risk relatives has value, the uptake of cascade testing remains at approximately 50%. It is important to understand strategies and barriers to testing to facilitate communication in families identified as haveing a hereditary cancer syndrome, to improve uptake of counselling and testing.
Method: A national online survey of both Canadian probands (the first member in a family to have genetic testing and who were variant positive, regardless of a cancer diagnosis) and their at-risk relatives. Respondents were individuals affected with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and LS. The survey was constructed based on a review of the literature and authors' feedback. Both open and closed-ended questions were used for items on demographic characteristics, risk perception, genetic test results and cancer diagnosis. Items on experiences with hereditary cancer risk communication, communication challenges, preferences and supports required were explored using a 5-point Likert scale.
Results: Responses indicated a high level of acceptance for the proband's direct involvement in family communication with the support of a health care provider (67% among the probands given a family letter and 55-57% among those who were not given a family letter). Respondents without a personal history of cancer were more likely to endorse a health care professional's help with family communication compared to those with a personal history of cancer (p = 0.031). Preferences for family member outreach also varied by education level, annual income, marital status and geographic location. Similarities were noted between the probands and relatives on communication outreach preferences.
Conclusion: While the family-mediated approach to communication remains the standard across many cancer genetics programs, participants note that additional support is necessary for dissemination of result information among relatives. Because family dynamics and communication vary widely, alternative options that retain the probands' involvement in family communication but add support from a health care provider should be explored.
背景:BRCA1、BRCA2 或林奇综合征(LS)等癌症易感综合征(CPS)患者罹患多种癌症的风险较高。要想让高危人群获得降低风险的策略,识别高危人群非常重要。对 BRCA 致病或可能致病(P/LP)变异携带者进行降低风险的输卵管切除术,或对 LS P/LP 变异携带者进行定期结肠镜检查等干预措施非常有效,并能降低死亡率。尽管有明确的证据表明识别高危亲属具有价值,但级联检测的接受率仍约为 50%。重要的是要了解检测的策略和障碍,以促进被确认为患有遗传性癌症综合征的家庭之间的沟通,从而提高咨询和检测的接受率:一项全国性在线调查,调查对象包括加拿大原癌基因携带者(家庭中第一个接受基因检测的成员,无论是否被诊断出癌症,其基因变异均呈阳性)及其高危亲属。受访者为遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)患者及 LS 患者。调查问卷是根据文献综述和作者的反馈意见设计的。有关人口统计学特征、风险认知、基因检测结果和癌症诊断的项目均采用开放式和封闭式问题。采用 5 点李克特量表对遗传性癌症风险交流经验、交流挑战、偏好和所需支持等项目进行了探讨:结果:受访者的回答表明,在医疗服务提供者的支持下,受访者对由原告直接参与家庭沟通的接受度较高(在收到家书的受访者中,接受度为 67%;在未收到家书的受访者中,接受度为 55-57%)。与有个人癌症病史的受访者相比,没有个人癌症病史的受访者更倾向于认可医疗保健专业人员在家庭沟通方面的帮助(p = 0.031)。不同教育水平、年收入、婚姻状况和地理位置的受访者对家庭成员外联的偏好也有所不同。在沟通外联偏好方面,原告和亲属之间存在相似之处:尽管以家庭为中介的沟通方式仍是许多癌症遗传学项目的标准,但参与者指出,在亲属中传播结果信息需要额外的支持。由于家庭动态和沟通方式千差万别,因此应探索其他方案,在保留受试者参与家庭沟通的同时,增加医疗服务提供者的支持。
{"title":"Exploring family communication preferences in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a national Canadian survey.","authors":"Kimberly Burke, Lesa Dawson, Kathleen Hodgkinson, Brenda J Wilson, Holly Etchegary","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00720-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00720-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals affected with cancer predisposition (CPS) syndromes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome (LS) are at an elevated risk of multiple cancers. Identifying high-risk individuals is important if they are to access risk-reducing strategies. Interventions such as risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants or regular colonoscopy for carriers of LS P/LP variants are highly effective and reduce mortality. Despite clear evidence that the identification of at-risk relatives has value, the uptake of cascade testing remains at approximately 50%. It is important to understand strategies and barriers to testing to facilitate communication in families identified as haveing a hereditary cancer syndrome, to improve uptake of counselling and testing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A national online survey of both Canadian probands (the first member in a family to have genetic testing and who were variant positive, regardless of a cancer diagnosis) and their at-risk relatives. Respondents were individuals affected with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and LS. The survey was constructed based on a review of the literature and authors' feedback. Both open and closed-ended questions were used for items on demographic characteristics, risk perception, genetic test results and cancer diagnosis. Items on experiences with hereditary cancer risk communication, communication challenges, preferences and supports required were explored using a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses indicated a high level of acceptance for the proband's direct involvement in family communication with the support of a health care provider (67% among the probands given a family letter and 55-57% among those who were not given a family letter). Respondents without a personal history of cancer were more likely to endorse a health care professional's help with family communication compared to those with a personal history of cancer (p = 0.031). Preferences for family member outreach also varied by education level, annual income, marital status and geographic location. Similarities were noted between the probands and relatives on communication outreach preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the family-mediated approach to communication remains the standard across many cancer genetics programs, participants note that additional support is necessary for dissemination of result information among relatives. Because family dynamics and communication vary widely, alternative options that retain the probands' involvement in family communication but add support from a health care provider should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"387-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00722-x
Narjes Trabelsi, Houcemeddine Othman, Hafsi Bedhioufi, Hamza Chouk, Haïfa El Mabrouk, Marwa Mahdouani, Moez Gribaa, Ali Saad, Dorra H'mida
As one of the key tools on the precision medicine workbench, high-throughput genetic testing has enormous promise for improving healthcare outcomes. Tunisia has made tremendous progress in acquiring and implementing the technology in the clinical context. However, current utilization does not ensure the whole range of benefits that high-throughput genomic testing provides which impedes the country's ability to move forward into the new era of precision medicine. This issue is primarily related to the current state of Tunisia's healthcare ecosystem and the sociological attributes of its population, creating numerous challenges that must be addressed. In the current review, we aimed to identify and highlight these challenges that may be prevalent in other low and middle-income countries. Essentially, they fall into three main categories that include the socio-economic landscape in Tunisia, which prevents citizens from engaging in precision medicine activities; the current settings of the healthcare system that lack or miss key components for the successful implementation of precision medicine practices; and the inability of the current infrastructure and resources to handle the various challenges related to genomic data and metadata. We also propose five pillar solutions as a framework for addressing all of these challenges, which could strengthen Tunisia's capability for effective precision medicine implementation in today's clinical environment.
{"title":"Is Tunisia ready for precision medicine? Challenges of medical genomics within a LMIC healthcare system.","authors":"Narjes Trabelsi, Houcemeddine Othman, Hafsi Bedhioufi, Hamza Chouk, Haïfa El Mabrouk, Marwa Mahdouani, Moez Gribaa, Ali Saad, Dorra H'mida","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00722-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00722-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As one of the key tools on the precision medicine workbench, high-throughput genetic testing has enormous promise for improving healthcare outcomes. Tunisia has made tremendous progress in acquiring and implementing the technology in the clinical context. However, current utilization does not ensure the whole range of benefits that high-throughput genomic testing provides which impedes the country's ability to move forward into the new era of precision medicine. This issue is primarily related to the current state of Tunisia's healthcare ecosystem and the sociological attributes of its population, creating numerous challenges that must be addressed. In the current review, we aimed to identify and highlight these challenges that may be prevalent in other low and middle-income countries. Essentially, they fall into three main categories that include the socio-economic landscape in Tunisia, which prevents citizens from engaging in precision medicine activities; the current settings of the healthcare system that lack or miss key components for the successful implementation of precision medicine practices; and the inability of the current infrastructure and resources to handle the various challenges related to genomic data and metadata. We also propose five pillar solutions as a framework for addressing all of these challenges, which could strengthen Tunisia's capability for effective precision medicine implementation in today's clinical environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"339-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411033/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Congenital anomalies (CAs) are an important cause of infant mortality and efficient surveillance is necessary for their prevention. Therefore, the objective of this study is to establish baselines of prevalence at birth of priority CAs for surveillance in the state of Santa Catarina, using data from the Live Birth Information System considering the period 2011-2019 (baseline) and 2020 (pandemic year). The analyses were carried out based on the mother's residence health macroregion. The CAs were selected following the ICD-10 coding for chapter XVII. Birth prevalence was calculated per 10,000 live births and the confidence interval was established at 95%. 2011-2019 recorded 88.8/10,000 births with CAs (total). For 2011-2019, limb defects (without polydactyly) were the most prevalent (14.1/10,000), followed by congenital heart defects (8.9), oral clefts (8.2), polydactyly (7.9), Down syndrome (5.6), hypospadias (5.4), neural tube defects (4.7), gastroschisis (3.3), undefined sex (1.2), microcephaly (0.8) and omphalocele (0.3). There were no significant differences in temporal and spatial distribution. However, unusual fluctuations were observed in 2020, which may reflect the pandemic in CAs notifications. In the base period, Santa Catarina recorded CAs below the expected level of being identified at birth. With this, we conclude that the training and awareness of teams are essential for the surveillance of CAs in Santa Catarina.
先天性畸形(CA)是婴儿死亡的一个重要原因,而有效的监测对于预防先天性畸形十分必要。因此,本研究的目的是利用活产信息系统(Live Birth Information System)提供的 2011-2019 年(基线年)和 2020 年(流行年)数据,建立圣卡塔琳娜州重点监测的先天性畸形(CA)出生率基线。分析是根据母亲居住的卫生大区进行的。根据 ICD-10 第 XVII 章的编码选择了 CA。出生率按每万名活产儿计算,置信区间为 95%。2011-2019 年,88.8/10,000 名新生儿患有肢体缺损(总数)。在 2011-2019 年期间,肢体缺陷(不含多指畸形)的发病率最高(14.1/10,000),其次是先天性心脏缺陷(8.9)、口腔裂(8.2)、多指畸形(7.9)、唐氏综合征(5.6)、尿道下裂(5.4)、神经管畸形(4.7)、胃裂(3.3)、性别不明(1.2)、小头畸形(0.8)和脐膨出(0.3)。在时间和空间分布上没有明显差异。然而,在 2020 年出现了不寻常的波动,这可能反映了 CAs 通知的大流行。在基期内,圣卡塔琳娜州记录的 CAs 低于出生时即被识别的预期水平。因此,我们得出结论,对团队进行培训并提高他们的认识对于圣卡塔琳娜州的 CA 监测工作至关重要。
{"title":"Congenital anomalies in Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil: macroregional and temporal birth prevalence for the period 2011-2020.","authors":"Laysa Kariny Krieck, Márcia Helena Barbian, Lavinia Schuler-Faccini, Betine Pinto Moehlecke Iser","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00716-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00716-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congenital anomalies (CAs) are an important cause of infant mortality and efficient surveillance is necessary for their prevention. Therefore, the objective of this study is to establish baselines of prevalence at birth of priority CAs for surveillance in the state of Santa Catarina, using data from the Live Birth Information System considering the period 2011-2019 (baseline) and 2020 (pandemic year). The analyses were carried out based on the mother's residence health macroregion. The CAs were selected following the ICD-10 coding for chapter XVII. Birth prevalence was calculated per 10,000 live births and the confidence interval was established at 95%. 2011-2019 recorded 88.8/10,000 births with CAs (total). For 2011-2019, limb defects (without polydactyly) were the most prevalent (14.1/10,000), followed by congenital heart defects (8.9), oral clefts (8.2), polydactyly (7.9), Down syndrome (5.6), hypospadias (5.4), neural tube defects (4.7), gastroschisis (3.3), undefined sex (1.2), microcephaly (0.8) and omphalocele (0.3). There were no significant differences in temporal and spatial distribution. However, unusual fluctuations were observed in 2020, which may reflect the pandemic in CAs notifications. In the base period, Santa Catarina recorded CAs below the expected level of being identified at birth. With this, we conclude that the training and awareness of teams are essential for the surveillance of CAs in Santa Catarina.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141451851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00712-z
Rachel Hodan, Miles Picus, Caroline Stanclift, Kelly E Ormond, Jennifer Morales Pichardo, Allison W Kurian, Charité Ricker, Gregory E Idos
Previous research on family communication of cancer genetic test results has primarily focused on non-Hispanic White patients with high-risk pathogenic variants (PV). There are limited data on patient communication of moderate-risk PVs, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and negative results. This qualitative study examined communication of positive, negative, and VUS hereditary cancer multi-gene panel (MGP) results in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population. As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 patients who underwent MGP testing at three hospitals in California, USA, free-text written survey responses to the question: "Feel free to share any thoughts or experiences with discussing genetic test results with others" were collected from participant questionnaires administered at 3 and 12-months post results disclosure. Content and thematic analyses were performed using a theory-driven analysis, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), on 256 responses from 214 respondents. Respondents with high perceived utility of sharing genetic test results often reported positive attitudes towards sharing test results and direct encouragement for genetic testing of others. Respondents with high self-efficacy in the sharing process were likely to report high perceived utility of sharing, whereas patients with low self-efficacy more often had VUS results and were more likely to report uncertainty about sharing. Consistent with TPB, our findings suggest that clinician reinforcement of the utility of genetic testing may increase intent for patients to communicate genetic information. Our findings suggest that clinicians should focus on strategies to improve patient understanding of VUS results.
{"title":"Family communication of cancer genetic test results in an ethnically diverse population: a qualitative exploration of more than 200 patients.","authors":"Rachel Hodan, Miles Picus, Caroline Stanclift, Kelly E Ormond, Jennifer Morales Pichardo, Allison W Kurian, Charité Ricker, Gregory E Idos","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00712-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00712-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research on family communication of cancer genetic test results has primarily focused on non-Hispanic White patients with high-risk pathogenic variants (PV). There are limited data on patient communication of moderate-risk PVs, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and negative results. This qualitative study examined communication of positive, negative, and VUS hereditary cancer multi-gene panel (MGP) results in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population. As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 patients who underwent MGP testing at three hospitals in California, USA, free-text written survey responses to the question: \"Feel free to share any thoughts or experiences with discussing genetic test results with others\" were collected from participant questionnaires administered at 3 and 12-months post results disclosure. Content and thematic analyses were performed using a theory-driven analysis, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), on 256 responses from 214 respondents. Respondents with high perceived utility of sharing genetic test results often reported positive attitudes towards sharing test results and direct encouragement for genetic testing of others. Respondents with high self-efficacy in the sharing process were likely to report high perceived utility of sharing, whereas patients with low self-efficacy more often had VUS results and were more likely to report uncertainty about sharing. Consistent with TPB, our findings suggest that clinician reinforcement of the utility of genetic testing may increase intent for patients to communicate genetic information. Our findings suggest that clinicians should focus on strategies to improve patient understanding of VUS results.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"363-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410745/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141176517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00707-w
Elizabeth W Barnhardt, Marilee Martens, Rebecca Andridge, Jennifer Walton
Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) may experience a variety of medical, behavioral, and educational concerns. The primary objective of this study was to assess barriers to health care for patients with WS, primarily using the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), and to assess whether various demographic factors are correlated with these barriers. A REDCap survey was distributed using the Williams Syndrome Association Research Registry. 319 caregivers of individuals with WS in the United States completed the BCQ. On the BCQ, lower scores indicate more barriers to care. Younger age was associated with lower scores for both the pragmatics and the skills subscales while lower income levels and increased distances to providers knowledgeable about WS were consistently associated with lower total BCQ scores.
{"title":"Caregiver-reported barriers to care for children and adults with Williams Syndrome.","authors":"Elizabeth W Barnhardt, Marilee Martens, Rebecca Andridge, Jennifer Walton","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00707-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00707-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) may experience a variety of medical, behavioral, and educational concerns. The primary objective of this study was to assess barriers to health care for patients with WS, primarily using the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), and to assess whether various demographic factors are correlated with these barriers. A REDCap survey was distributed using the Williams Syndrome Association Research Registry. 319 caregivers of individuals with WS in the United States completed the BCQ. On the BCQ, lower scores indicate more barriers to care. Younger age was associated with lower scores for both the pragmatics and the skills subscales while lower income levels and increased distances to providers knowledgeable about WS were consistently associated with lower total BCQ scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"375-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141076804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-08DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00711-0
Iskandar Hermanto, Cindy Kurniawati Chandra, Agustini Utari, Tri Indah Winarni, Ferdy Kurniawan Cayami
The development in human genetics must be tracked with the knowledge to provide support and positive attitudes towards genetic research and its healthcare applications, including genetic testing. Unfortunately, there has been a delay in enacting public policies related to the genetics professionals as well as the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of genetic diseases in Indonesia. This research was conducted to build an overview of genetic knowledge and public attitudes toward genetic testing among Indonesian undergraduates. This cross-sectional study involved undergraduate students selected using the convenience sampling method. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: a true/false questionnaire (16 statements) regarding knowledge of genetics and a 5-points Likert scale questionnaire (27 statements) pertaining to attitudes towards genetic testing. A total of 1596 undergraduate students completed online questionnaire. The highest knowledge score and the most positive overall attitudes were observed in the healthcare-related majors compared to those who studied science and technology and social and humanity. A weak positive correlation was observed between knowledge and attitude toward genetic testing (Pearson's r = 0.206, p < 0.001). Undergraduate students from healthcare-related majors displayed better in both knowledge of genetics and had more positive attitudes toward genetic testing.
必须跟踪人类遗传学的发展,了解如何为遗传学研究及其医疗应用(包括基因检测)提供支持和积极态度。遗憾的是,印尼迟迟没有颁布与遗传学专业人员以及遗传病诊断、治疗和预防相关的公共政策。本研究旨在了解印尼大学生的遗传学知识和公众对基因检测的态度。这项横断面研究采用方便抽样法选取本科生。问卷由两部分组成:关于遗传学知识的真/假问卷(16 项陈述)和关于对基因检测的态度的 5 分李克特量表问卷(27 项陈述)。共有 1596 名本科生完成了在线问卷调查。与学习科学和技术以及社会和人文科学的学生相比,学习医疗保健相关专业的学生知识得分最高,总体态度也最积极。基因检测知识和态度之间存在微弱的正相关(Pearson's r = 0.206,p<0.05)。
{"title":"Knowledge of genetics and attitudes toward genetic testing among university students in Indonesia.","authors":"Iskandar Hermanto, Cindy Kurniawati Chandra, Agustini Utari, Tri Indah Winarni, Ferdy Kurniawan Cayami","doi":"10.1007/s12687-024-00711-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12687-024-00711-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development in human genetics must be tracked with the knowledge to provide support and positive attitudes towards genetic research and its healthcare applications, including genetic testing. Unfortunately, there has been a delay in enacting public policies related to the genetics professionals as well as the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of genetic diseases in Indonesia. This research was conducted to build an overview of genetic knowledge and public attitudes toward genetic testing among Indonesian undergraduates. This cross-sectional study involved undergraduate students selected using the convenience sampling method. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: a true/false questionnaire (16 statements) regarding knowledge of genetics and a 5-points Likert scale questionnaire (27 statements) pertaining to attitudes towards genetic testing. A total of 1596 undergraduate students completed online questionnaire. The highest knowledge score and the most positive overall attitudes were observed in the healthcare-related majors compared to those who studied science and technology and social and humanity. A weak positive correlation was observed between knowledge and attitude toward genetic testing (Pearson's r = 0.206, p < 0.001). Undergraduate students from healthcare-related majors displayed better in both knowledge of genetics and had more positive attitudes toward genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"433-447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410749/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141293819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}