Journal of Community Genetics最新文献

The South Carolina cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) program changed in 2019 to include CFTR genotyping for babies with top 4% immunoreactive trypsinogen, which improves sensitivity and timeliness but increases carrier detection. Carrier identification has genetic implications for the family and parents of NBS+ babies have increased emotional distress. Genetic counseling (GC) may increase parent understanding and reduce anxiety yet is not uniformly offered at CF centers. We report our early results after implementing GC for NBS+ families at the time of sweat chloride testing based on GC availability, which resulted in an unselected GC- control arm. Sixteen mothers (GC+ = 9, GC- = 7) participated in an online survey about their experience. Responses were analyzed in aggregate and for differences between GC+ and GC- groups. All-respondent sadness and anxiety increased with notification of the NBS+ result and decreased after sweat test results. Anxiety and sadness were greater in GC- compared to GC+ until after the diagnosis was resolved, though emotional differences between the groups were not statistically significant. On a scale of 0 = not at all to 10 = extremely, GC was rated very helpful (mean 9.0, range 5-10), informative (mean 8.9, range 4-10), comforting (mean 9.1, range 6-10), and minimally distracting (mean 1.8, range 0-9). All participants correctly identified that a risk for a child to have CF exists when both parents are (at least) carriers. Delivery of NBS results to respondents varied by timing, informant, and information given. The child's pediatrician notified 10 (62.5%) of the NBS+ result. Parents felt they were notified in a timely manner (68.8%), by someone knowledgeable about NBS (62.5%), the sweat test (62.5%), CF (43.8%), and genetics (43.8%) and who cared about them (81.3%). Parents felt worried (81.3%), confused (81.3%), empowered (25%), and other (sad, shocked, scared, overwhelmed, devastated, defeated). Data from this single-center study suggest benefit of GC, that families would value earlier contact with an expert, and that prompt diagnostic resolution may reduce duration of parental distress.

Irish Health Service objectives state that patients with rare diseases should have timely access to genomic diagnostics with appropriate pre and post-test counselling. However, waiting times for clinical genetics outpatient appointments, during the study period, were up to two years as staffing levels remain low. A targeted public online survey was conducted in January 2022 to capture the experiences of Rare Disease families trying to access genetic testing and clinical genetic clinics in the Irish Republic. Irish patients experience significant waiting times to access clinical genetic services and self-report anxiety and stress, related to delayed access to diagnosis, clarity around recurrence risk and follow-up management. This negatively impacts personal decisions around family planning, education and employment and has a significant impact on family members seeking clarity on their own risk. Mainstream genetic testing activity is significant. Families report concern over the competency of health care professionals arranging and delivering genetic results and delays in accessing clinical genetics expertise to take them through the clinical implications. Timely access to clinical genetics expertise is important to ensure families with rare diseases have an appropriate understanding of the medical and reproductive implications of a genetic diagnosis and access to relevant care pathways. A national framework to develop competency in genomic literacy for health-care professionals including a national genetic test directory may be beneficial. Clinical genetics teams require ongoing support and investment to ensure the delivery of a safe and effective service for Irish families with rare diseases.

Circassians and Chechens in Jordan, both with Caucasian ancestry, are genetically isolated due to high rate of endogamous marriages. Recent interest in these populations has led to studies on their genetic similarities, differences, and epidemiological differences in various diseases. Research has explored their predisposition to conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and cancer. Moreover, pharmacogenetic (PGx) studies have also investigated medication response variations within these populations, and forensic studies have further contributed to understanding these populations. In this review article, we first discuss the background of these minority groups. We then show the results of a principle component analysis (PCA) to investigate the genetic relationships between Circassian and Chechen populations living in Jordan. We here present a summary of the findings from the 10 years of research conducted on them. The review article provides a comprehensive summary of research findings that are truly valuable for understanding the unique genetic characteristics, diseases' prevalence, and medication responses among Circassians and Chechens living in Jordan. We believe that gaining deeper comprehension of the root causes of various diseases and developing effective treatment methods that benefit the society as a whole are imperative to engaging a wide range of ethnic groups in genetic research.

As cost-effective next-generation genome sequencing rapidly develops, calls for greater inclusion of Black people in genomic research, policy, and practice are necessary for effective translation of genomic science into precision population health and medicine. Employing a community-based participatory mixed methods research design, we developed a semi-structured survey that was disseminated to three cancer advocacy organizations. Of the 81 survey respondents 49 (60%) self-identified as Black, and 26 (32%) indicated a prior breast cancer diagnosis. Black participants' expressed concerns about genetic testing were evenly distributed between concerns that could be addressed through genetic counseling (24%) and concerns about subsequent use of their genetic data (27%). Patient advocates contributed to contextualization of respondent concerns in terms of community experiences. Although genetic counseling services and policies governing genomic data use are not always accessible to many Black communities, advocates on our research team provided a bridge to discussion of the intersection between respondent concerns and the roles advocates play in filling gaps in access to genetic counseling and data governance. Concerns expressed by Black patients underscore a shared need among all patients for access to education, inclusion in research, and assurances regarding the use and handling of genetic data. Black cancer patients have joined in patient-led efforts to overcome systemic inequities in cancer care to improve their health outcomes through representation. Often their efforts are overshadowed by a relentless burden of continued health disparities. Future research should support their hidden work as a means to reduce barriers and improve representation in genomic databases.

Promoting family communication about inherited disease risk is an arena in which family systems theory is highly relevant. One family systems' construct that can support promotion of family communication regarding inherited disease risk is the notion of "kin keeping." However, kin keeping and whether it might be capitalized on to encourage family communication about inherited risk has been understudied. The goal of this report was to propose a broadened conceptualization of kin keeping that distinguishes between a structural functional perspective (role conceptualization) and transitional behaviors (skill conceptualization), and to develop and evaluate a scale that would enable this assertion to be tested among a sample of African American community health workers. We developed a scale using four steps: item development using concept analysis and content validity, scale development among a national sample (n = 312), scale evaluation using exploratory factor analysis (n = 52), and scale reduction. We then posed suppositions of associations that would indicate whether the developed kin keeping measure was assessing a specific family role or set of behaviors. Our results included the development of the first quantitative measure of kin keeping (9- and 15-item scales). Model fit for 9-item scale (CFI = 0.97, AFGI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, SMRM = 0.06) and model fit for 15-item scale (CFI = 0.97, AFGI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.06, SMRM = 0.05). These findings allow us to move toward more rigorous research about the role of kin keeping on information sharing and health decision making. Results also suggest that, contrary to the historical structural functional conceptualization of kin keeping as a role, kin keeping might also be conceptualized as a behavior or set of modifiable behaviors. Ultimately, the kin keeping scale could be used to operationalize kin keeping in various theoretical models and frameworks, guide intervention development to encourage or train for kin keeping behaviors, and test assumptions of whether families vary in the density of kin keeping.

This study was planned to determine maternal attitudes and knowledge about newborn screening. The universe of the descriptive study consisted of postpartum mothers living in the centers of three provinces in the north and east of Turkey. The sample included mothers who were older than 18 years of age, who could read and write Turkish, whose babies were in the 24th and 72nd hour after birth, and who volunteered to take part in the study. The study was completed with 407 mothers. The data were collected with the face-to-face interview method by the researchers using the "Descriptive Information Form" and the "Maternal Attitudes and Knowledge Survey about Newborn Screening." The results showed that 40.3% of the mothers were between the ages of 25 and 30 years, 52.8% received information about newborn screening, 61.1% received this information during pregnancy (27.3% in the first trimester and 33.8% in the last trimester), and most of the information was provided by a healthcare professional (77.8%). Mothers with only one child (p = .001) and those with nuclear families (p = .024) were found to have lower maternal attitudes and knowledge about newborn screening. The study showed that the level of knowledge of Turkish mothers about newborn screening is inadequate in general. In particular, the knowledge and attitudes of mothers with nuclear families, those with one child, and those not having regular check-ups during pregnancy are inadequate. Improving mothers' understanding of screening tests will lead to more successful screening program implementation and earlier detection and care of newborns with a disease.

Advances in precision medicine depend on the quantity and quality of available genomic information. Various articles alert about the current disparities between the world's regions regarding the amount of genomic information available and the negative impact this will have on global health. The objective of this paper is to review these articles to describe what aspects they emphasize and highlight some issues that remain to be analyzed from the perspective of a "peripheral" country. Most of these articles come from central countries, where the need for more diversity in genomics is already detected. Several authors analyze lack of human diversity with focus on national, while others analyze the problem from a global perspective. Depending on the country of origin of the research, the claim for greater diversity has different meanings. Broadly, high-income countries advocate for better coverage looking within the boundaries of their own countries. In other regions of the world, where this field of research has not yet been massively developed, the same need for greater inclusiveness of origins in population genomics studies is not detected. An under-analyzed aspect is the unequal starting point between regions regarding the economic resources available for the development of this field of medicine, and for science and health in general. Although this macroeconomic and social aspect is usually absent in scientific analyses, without it solved, it will be impossible to guarantee that all world populations are equally represented in the panels or genomic databases that serve as input for precision medicine development.

With the rapid expansion of genomic medicine, more citizens are compelled to think about genetics in their daily lives. This study aims to explore appropriate types of educational media and methods to enlighten activities for genetics and hereditary cancer. We presented an 18-min YouTube video on genetics and hereditary cancer to participants at a scientific event, Science Agora 2020, and administered a web questionnaire to investigate their opinions about when and how citizens should start learning about genetics and hereditary cancer. We recruited 133 participants who watched the video, and 26.3% (35/133) responded to the questionnaire. Most of them were evaluated to understand and appreciate the contents of the video. They identified websites, or videos as suitable learning media, irrespective of their sex, age, or profession. They highlighted upper elementary school or junior high school as appropriate educational stages to start learning about genetics and hereditary cancer to facilitate collecting their own genetic information by themselves. Our findings show that educational institutions should provide opportunities to learn about genetics and hereditary cancers, especially for upper elementary school and junior high school students, using learning media, such as videos, depending on their level or demand.

Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are rare genetic disorders characterized by increased susceptibility to infection and immune system dysregulation. Despite the significant physical toll of IEIs, there is less information on clinical and patient-reported biopsychosocial outcomes and how these individuals psychologically adapt. We invited adults with IEIs or suspected IEIs (sIEIs) enrolled on a protocol at the National Institutes of Health to complete a cross-sectional survey measuring patient-reported biopsychosocial outcomes, psychological adaptation, and perceived control. We received responses from 312 individuals. Levels of adaptation to illness were similar to previously published cohorts of individuals with chronic health conditions. Participants reported significantly increased levels of anxiety, pain, sleep disturbance, and fatigue and significantly lower levels of physical functioning compared to the general population (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that perceived present control was significantly positively associated with adaptation (β = 0.26, p < 0.05). We found that perceived present control was significantly associated with psychological adaptation. Individuals with sIEIs in our sample struggled with poorer biopsychosocial outcomes than the general population, although these may not ultimately be directly related to psychological adaptation. Interventions to increase perceived control may be beneficial to this patient population. Clinicians should also consider screening and management for psychological and physical concerns including anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, pain, and fatigue.